Crossref Citations
This Book has been
cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Coughlin, Peter J.
1990.
MAJORITY RULE AND ELECTION MODELS.
Journal of Economic Surveys,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 2,
p.
157.
Simmons, James R.
1992.
Economic Theory of Democracy Revisited and Revised.
New Political Science,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 3,
p.
29.
Baron, David P.
1993.
Government Formation and Endogenous Parties.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 87,
Issue. 1,
p.
34.
Lohmann, Susanne
1993.
A Signaling Model of Informative and Manipulative Political Action.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 87,
Issue. 2,
p.
319.
Lafay, Jean-Dominique
1993.
Preferences and Democracy.
Vol. 28,
Issue. ,
p.
159.
Alesina, Alberto
and
Perotti, Roberto
1994.
The Political Economy of Budget Deficits.
IMF Working Papers,
Vol. 94,
Issue. 85,
p.
1.
Merrill, Samuel
1994.
A Probabilistic Model for the Spatial Distribution of Party Support in Multiparty Electorates.
Journal of the American Statistical Association,
Vol. 89,
Issue. 428,
p.
1190.
Skaperdas, Stergios
and
Grofman, Bernard
1995.
Modeling Negative Campaigning.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 89,
Issue. 1,
p.
49.
Krämer, Jürgen
and
Rattinger, Hans
1997.
The proximity and the directional theories of issue voting: Comparative results for the USA and Germany.
European Journal of Political Research,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Dow, Jay K.
1998.
A spatial analysis of the 1989 Chilean presidential election.
Electoral Studies,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 1,
p.
61.
Merrill, Samuel
and
Grofman, Bernard
1998.
Conceptualizing voter choice for directional and discounting models of two-candidate spatial competition in terms of shadow candidates.
Public Choice,
Vol. 95,
Issue. 3-4,
p.
219.
Brennan, Geoffrey
and
Hamlin, Alan
1998.
Expressive voting and electoral equilibrium.
Public Choice,
Vol. 95,
Issue. 1-2,
p.
149.
McCarty, Nolan M.
and
Poole, Keith T.
1998.
An Empirical Spatial Model of Congressional Campaigns.
Political Analysis,
Vol. 7,
Issue. ,
p.
1.
Merrill, Samuel
Grofman, Bernard
and
Feld, Scott L.
1999.
Nash equilibrium strategies in directional models of two- candidate spatial competition.
Public Choice,
Vol. 98,
Issue. 3-4,
p.
369.
Amorim Neto, Octavio
and
Magar, Eric
2000.
Veto Bargaining and Coalition Formation: A Theory of Presidential Policymaking with Application to Venezuela.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Thurner, Paul W.
and
Eymann, Angelika
2000.
Policy-Specific Alienation and Indifference in the Calculus of Voting: A Simultaneous Model of Party Choice and Abstention.
Public Choice,
Vol. 102,
Issue. 1-2,
p.
49.
Collins, R
and
Sherstyuk, K
2000.
Spatial competition with three firms: an experimental study.
Economic Inquiry,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 1,
p.
73.
Stadler, Bärbel M.R.
2000.
Abstention causes bifurcations in two-party voting dynamics.
Applied Mathematics and Computation,
Vol. 114,
Issue. 2-3,
p.
215.
Fisher, Stephen D.
2000.
Party preference structure in England, 1987–97.
British Elections & Parties Review,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 1,
p.
64.
Maravall, José María
2001.
Controlling Governments.
p.
157.