Skip to main content
×
×
Home
The Aporetic Tradition in Ancient Philosophy
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    The Aporetic Tradition in Ancient Philosophy
    • Online ISBN: 9781316274293
    • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316274293
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to *
    ×
  • Buy the print book

Book description

Ancient philosophers from an otherwise diverse range of traditions were connected by their shared use of aporia - translated as puzzlement rooted in conflicts of reasons - as a core tool in philosophical enquiry. The essays in this volume provide the first comprehensive study of aporetic methodology among numerous major figures and influential schools, including the Presocratics, Plato, Aristotle, Plutarch, Alexander of Aphrodisias, Academic sceptics, Pyrrhonian sceptics, Plotinus and Damascius. They explore the differences and similarities in these philosophers' approaches to the source, structure, and aim of aporia, their views on its function and value, and ideas about the proper means of generating such a state among thinkers who were often otherwise opposed in their overall philosophical orientation. Discussing issues of method, dialectic, and knowledge, the volume will appeal to those interested in ancient philosophy and in philosophical enquiry more generally.

Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×
Allen, J. (1994) ‘Academic Probabilism and Stoic Epistemology’, Classical Quarterly 44: 85113.
Allen, J. (1997) ‘Carneadean Argument in Cicero’s Academic Books’, in Inwood, B. and Mansfeld, J (eds.), Assent and Argument: Studies in Cicero’s Academic Books, Leiden: Brill, 217–56.
Allen, R. E. (1997) Plato’s Parmenides, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Anderson, A. (1969) ‘Socratic Reasoning in the “Euthyphro”’, Review of Metaphysics 22: 461–81.
Annas, J. (1992) ‘Plato the Sceptic’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy: Methods of Interpreting Plato and His Dialogues, Supplementary Volume: 43–72.
Annas, J. (2011) ‘Ancient Scepticism and Ancient Religion’, in Morrison, B. and Ierodiakonou, K. (eds.), Episteme, etc. Essays in Honour of Jonathan Barnes, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 7590.
Annas, J. and Barnes, J. (1985) The Modes of Scepticism: Ancient Texts and Modern Interpretations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Annas, J. and Barnes, J. (2000) Sextus Empiricus: Outlines of Scepticism, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 195264.
Armstrong, H. (1967) ‘Plotinus’, in Armstrong, H. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Aubenque, P. (1961a) ‘Aristoteles und das Problem der Metaphysik’, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 15: 321–33.
Aubenque, P. (1961b) ‘Sur la notion aristotélicienne d’aporie’, in Mansion, S. (ed.), Aristote et les problèmes de méthode, Louvain, Publications Universitaires, 319.
Aubenque, P. (1966) Le problème de l’être chez Aristote. Essai sur la problématique aristotélicienne, 2nd ed., Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Babut, D. (1994) ‘Du scepticisme au dépassement de la raison: Philosophie et foi réligieuse chez Plutarque’, in Parerga: choix d’articles de Daniel Babut (1974–1994), Lyon: Maison de l’Orient Mediterranéen, 549–84.
Babut, D. (2007) ‘L’unité de l’Académie selon Plutarque. Notes en marge d’un débat ancien et toujours actuel’, in Bonazzi, M., Lévy, C. and Steel, C. (eds.), A Platonic Pythagoras: Platonism and Pythagoreanism in the Imperial Age, Turnhout: Brepols, 6398.
Ballériaux, O. (2001) ‘Platon, Sophiste’, in Motte, A. and Rutten, C. (eds.), Aporia dans la Philosophie grecque. Des origines à Aristote, Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters, 8191.
Barnes, J. (1981) ‘Proof and the Syllogism’, in Berti, E. (ed.), Aristotle on Science: The ‘Posterior Analytics’, Padua: Antenore, 1759.
Barnes, J. (1982a) The Presocratic Philosophers, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Barnes, J. (1982b): ‘Medicine, Experience and Logic’, in Barnes, J., Brunschwig, J., Burnyeat, M. F. and Schofield, M. (eds.), Science and Speculation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2468.
Barnes, J. (1983) ‘Aphorism and Argument’, in Robb, K. (ed.), Language and Thought in Early Greek Philosophy, La Salle, IL: Monist Library of Philosophy, 91109.
Barnes, J. (1989) ‘Antiochus of Ascalon’, in Griffin, M. and Barnes, J. (eds.), Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society, vol. I, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 5196.
Barnes, J. (1990) The Toils of Scepticism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barnes, J. (1991/2011) ‘Philosophy and Dialectic’, (French version), in Sinaceur, M. A. (ed.), Penser avec Aristote, Toulouse: Édition Ères, 107–16.
Barnes, J. (1992) ‘Diogenes Laertius IX 61–116: The Philosophy of Pyrrhonism’, in Hasse, W. (ed.), Philosophie, Wissenschaften, Technik. Philosophie, Berlin: De Gruyter, 4241–301.
Barnes, J. (2007) ‘Sextan Scepticism’, in Scott, D. (ed.), Maieusis, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 322–34.
Bell, I. H. (2004) Metaphysics as an Aristotelian Science, Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.
Benson, H. H. (1992) ‘Why Is There a Discussion of False Belief in the Theaetetus?’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 30: 171–99.
Benson, H. H. (2000) Socratic Wisdom: The Model of Knowledge in Plato’s Early Dialogues, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Benson, H. H. (2006) ‘Plato’s Method of Dialectic’, in Benson, H. (ed.), Blackwell Companion to Plato Oxford: Blackwell, 8599.
Berti, E. (1997) ‘Philosophie, dialectique et sophistique dans Metaphysique 2’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 51: 379–96.
Berti, E. (2005) ‘Aristotelian Endoxa as a Basis for a Modern Reasonableness’, in Dottori, R. (ed.), Reason and Reasonableness, Münster: LIT Verlag, 177–90.
Bett, R. (1997) Sextus Empiricus: Against the Ethicists, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bett, R. (2000) Pyrrho, His Antecedents, and His Legacy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bett, R. (2009) ‘Sextus Empiricus’, in Trakakis, N. and Oppy, G. (eds.), History of Western Philosophy and Religion, vol. I, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 173–85.
Bett, R. (2015) ‘God: M 9.13–194’, in Algra, K. and Ieorodiakonou, K. (eds.), Sextus Empiricus and Ancient Physics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3373.
Beversluis, J. (2000) Cross-Examining Socrates: A Defense of the Interlocutors in Plato’s Early Dialogues, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Binder, G. and Liesenborghs, L. (1976) ‘Eine Zuweisung der Sentenz οὐκ ἔστιν ἀντιλέγειν an Prodikos von Keos’, in Classen, C. J. (ed.), Sophistik, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 452–62.
Bobzien, S. (2002) ‘Chrysippus and the Epistemic Theory of Vagueness’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102: 217–38.
Bolton, R. (1990) ‘The Epistemological Basis of Aristotelian Dialectic’, in Devereux, D. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), Biologie, logique et métaphysique chez Aristote, Paris: Editions du CNRS, 185236.
Bonazzi, M. (2003) Academici e Platonici. Il dibattito antico sullo scetticismo di Platone, Milan: LED.
Bonelli, M. (2001) Alessandro di Afrodisia e la metafisica come scienza dimostrativa, Naples: Bibliopolis.
Bonelli, M. (2006) ‘Continuité et rupture dans l’Académie et le platonisme’, Etudes platoniciennes III, Paris: Société d’Études Platoniciennes, 231–44.
Bonelli, M. (2014) ‘Plutarch and the Sceptics’, in Beck, M. (ed.), A Companion to Plutarch, Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 121–34.
Boylan, M. (1982) ‘The Digestive and ‘Circulatory’ Systems in Aristotle’s Biology’, Journal of the History of Biology 15: 89118.
Boys-Stones, G. (1997a) ‘Thyrsus-Bearer of the Academy or Enthusiast for Plato? Plutarch’s De Stoicorum Repugnantiis’, in Mossman, J. (ed.), Plutarch and His Intellectual World, London: Classical Press of Wales, 4158.
Boys-Stones, G. (1997b) ‘Plutarch on the Probable Principle of Cold: Epistemology and the De Primo Frigido’, Classical Quarterly 47: 227–38.
Brague, R. (1978) Le Restand. Supplément aux commentaires du Ménon de Platon, Paris: Vrin.
Brandwood, L. (1990) The Chronology of Plato’s Dialogues, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bréhier, É. (1968) La philosophie de Plotin, Paris: Vrin.
Brickhouse, T. C. and Smith, N. D. (1994) Plato’s Socrates, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brisson, L. (1999) Platon Parménide, Paris: Flammarion.
Brittain, C. (2001) Philo of Larissa: The Last of the Academic Sceptics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brittain, C. (2006) (trans.) Cicero: On Academic Scepticism, Indianapolis: Hackett.
Brittain, C. (2007) ‘Middle Platonists on Academic Scepticism’, in Sharples, R. W and Sorabji, R. (eds.), Greek and Roman Philosophy 100 B.C–200 A.D., vol. II, London: Institute of Classical Studies, 297315.
Brittain, C. and Palmer, J. (2001) ‘The New Academy’s Appeals to the Presocratics’, Phronesis 48: 3872.
Broadie, S. (2009) ‘Aporia 8’, in Crubellier, M and Laks, A (eds.), Aristotle’s Metaphysics Beta, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 135–50.
Brown, L. (1998) ‘Innovation and Continuity: The Battle of Gods and Giants, Sophist 245–249’, in Gentzler, J. (ed.), Method in Ancient Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 181208.
Brown, L. (2008) ‘The Sophist on Statements, Predication, and Falsehood’, in Fine, G. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Plato, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 437–62.
Brown, L. (2010) ‘Definition and Division in Plato’s Sophist’, in Charles, D. (ed.), Definition in Greek Philosophy, 151–71.
Brown, L. (2011) ‘Negation and Not-Being: Dark Matter in the Sophist’, in Patterson, R., Karasmanis, V. and Hermann, A. (eds.), Presocratics and Plato: A Festschrift for Charles Kahn, Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing, 268–91.
Bruns, I. (1887 and 1892) Scripta Minora, vols. 1 and 2, Berlin: Reimer.
Brunschwig, J. (1967) Aristote, Topiques. Tome I, Livres I–IV, Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Brunschwig, J. (1984/85) ‘Aristotle on Arguments without Winners or Losers’, in Wissenschaftskolleg Jahrbuch, Berlin, 3140.
Brunschwig, J. (1994) ‘Sextus Empiricus on the Criterion’, in his Papers in Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 224–43.
Brunschwig, J. (2000) ‘Dialectique et philosophie chez Aristote à nouveau’, in Cordero, N. L. (ed.), Ontologie et dialogue. Hommage à Pierre Aubenque, Paris: Vrin, 107–30.
Brunschwig, J. (2007) Aristote, Topiques. Tome II, Livres V–VIII, Paris: Les Belle Lettres.
Buchheim, T. (1989) Gorgias von Leontini: Reden, Fragmente und Testimonien. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
Burnet, J. (1901) Platonis Opera II, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Burnyeat, M. F. (1976) ‘Protagoras and Self-Refutation in Later Greek Philosophy’, Philosophical Review 85: 4469.
Burnyeat, M. F. (1977a) ‘Examples in Epistemology: Socrates, Theaetetus, and G.E. Moore’, Philosophy 52: 381–98.
Burnyeat, M. F. (1977b) ‘Socratic Midwifery, Platonic Inspiration’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 24: 716.
Burnyeat, M. F. (1982) ‘Gods and Heaps’, in Schofield, M. and Nussbaum, M. (eds.), Language and Logos: Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 315–38.
Burnyeat, M. F. (1990) The Theaetetus of Plato, Indianapolis: Hackett.
Burnyeat, M. F. (1997) ‘Antipater and Self-Refutation: Elusive Arguments in Cicero’s Academica’, in Inwood, B and Mansfeld, J. (eds.), Assent and Argument: Studies in Cicero’s Academic Books, Leiden: Brill, 277310.
Calogero, G. (1932) Studi sull’Eleatismo, Rome: Tipografia del senato.
Caluori, D. (2015) Plotinus on the Soul, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Caluori, D. (forthcoming) ‘Socratic Methods in Damascius’, in Moore, C. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Socrates, Leiden: Brill.
Campbell, L. (1883) The Theaetetus of Plato, with a revised text and English notes, 2nd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Castelnérac, B. and Marion, M. (2009) ‘Arguing for Inconsistency: Dialectical Games in the Academy’, in Primiero, G. and Rahman, S. (eds.), Acts of Knowledge: History, Philosophy and Logic, London: College Publications, 4382.
Castagnoli, L. (2002) Review of R. Bett, Pyrrho, His Antecedents, and His Legacy (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), in Ancient Philosophy 22: 443–57.
Castagnoli, L. (2010) Ancient Self-Refutation: The Logic and History of the Self-Refutation Argument from Democritus to Augustine, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Castagnoli, L. (2013) ‘Early Pyrrhonism: Pyrrho to Aenesidemus’, in Sheffield, F. and Warren, J. (eds.), Routledge Companion to Ancient Philosophy, London: Routledge, 496510.
Castagnoli, L. (2018) ‘Anesidemus’, in Machuca, D. and Reed, B. (eds.), Skepticism: From Antiquity to the Present, London: Bloomsbury, 6780.
Castelnérac, B. and Marion, M. (2009) ‘Arguing for Inconsistency: Dialectical Games in the Academy’, in Primiero, G. and Rahman, S. (eds.), Acts of Knowledge: History, Philosophy and Logic, London: College Publications, 4382.
Chance, T. H. (1991) Plato’s Euthydemus. Analysis of What Is and What Is Not Philosophy, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Charrue, P. (1978) Plotin lecteur de Platon, Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Chiaradonna, R. (2013) ‘Alexander, Boethus, and the Other Peripatetics: The Theory of Universals in the Aristotelian Commentators’, in Chiaradonna, R. and Galuzzo, G. (eds.), Universals in Ancient Philosophy, Pisa: Edizioni della Normale, 299328.
Cleary, J. J. (1995) Aristotle and Mathematics: Aporetic Method in Cosmology and Metaphysics, Leiden: Brill.
Combès, J. (1989) ‘Damascius Lecteur du Parménide’, in his Etudes Néoplatoniciennes, Grénoble, 6399.
Cooper, J. (2004) ‘Arcesilaus: Socratic and Sceptic’, in his Knowledge, Nature and the Good, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 81103.
Cooper, J. (2007) ‘Socrates and Philosophy as a Way of Life’, in Scott, D. (ed.), Maieusis: Essays on Ancient Philosophy in Honour of Myles Burnyeat, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2043.
Cooper, J. (2012) ‘Conclusion—and Retrospect (Metaphysics A 10)’, in Steel, C. (ed.), Aristotle’s Metaphysics Alpha: Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 335–64.
Cornford, F. M. (1939) Plato and Parmenides, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Corrigan, K. (2005) Reading Plotinus: A Practical Introduction to Neoplatonism, Indiana: Perdue University Press.
Cotton, A. K. (2014) Platonic Dialogue and the Education of the Reader, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Couissin, P. (1929) ‘Le Stoicisme de la Nouvelle Académie’, Revue d’histoire de la Philosophie 3: 241–76. (English trans. in Burnyeat, M. F. (ed.), (1983), The Skeptical Tradition, Berkeley: University of California Press, 3163.)
Couloubaritsis, L. (1990) ‘La problématique sceptique d’un impensé: ἡ σκέψις’, in Voelke, A. J. (ed.), Le scepticisme antique, Cahier de la Revue de Théologie et de Philosophie 15: 928.
Crivelli, P. (1996) ‘The Argument from Knowing and Not Knowing in Plato’s Theaetetus (187e5– 188c8)’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96: 177–96.
Crivelli, P. (2012) Plato’s Account of Falsehood: A Study of the Sophist, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crubellier, M. and Laks, A. (2009) ‘Introduction’, in Crubellier, M. and Laks, M. (eds.), Aristotle: Metaphysics Beta: Symposium Aristotelicum, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 123.
De Waal, T. (2009) Knowing Platonist Objects: The Access Problem and Its Solution in Plato, PhD dissertation, King’s College London.
Decleva Caizzi, F. (1981) Pirrone: Testimonianze, Naples: Bibliopolis.
Decleva Caizzi, F. (1992) ‘Aenesidemus and the Academy’, Classical Quarterly 42: 176–89.
Delcomminette, S. (2014) ‘Odysseus and the Home of the Stranger from Elea’, Classical Quarterly 64: 533–41.
des Places, E. (1973) Numénius Fragments (ed. and trans.), Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Diès, A. (1956) Platon Parménide, Paris.
Dillon, J. M. (1996) ‘Damascius on the Ineffable’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 78: 120–9.
Dillon, J. M. (1999) ‘Plutarch’s Debt to Xenocrates’, in Perez Jimenez, A. et al. (eds), Plutarco, Platon y Aristoteles: Actas del V Congreso internacional de la I.P.S.,Madrid, 305311. (repr. in Dillon, The Platonic Heritage, Farnham: Ashgate, 2012).
Dillon, J. M. and Blumenthal, H. J. (2015) Ennead IV.3–4.29. Problems concerning the Soul, Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing.
Dodds, E. R. (1928) ‘The Parmenides of Plato and the Origins of the Neoplatonic One’, Classical Quarterly 22: 129–42.
Donini, P. L. (1994) ‘Testi e commenti, manuali e insegnamento: la forma sistematica e i metodi della filosofia in età postellenistica’, in ANRW II.36.7, 50275100.
Donini, P. L. (2002) ‘L’eredità academica e i fondamenti del platonismo in Plutarco’, in Barbanti, M. and Romano, F. (eds.), Henōsis kai Philia: Unione e amicizia. Omaggio a Francesco Romano, Catania: CUECM, 247–73.
Dooley, W. E. and Madigan, A. (1992) Alexander of Aphrodisias on Aristotle’s Metaphysics 2 and 3, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Dorion, L.-A. (2013) ‘Aristotle and the Socratic elenchos’, in Rapp, C. and Hasper, P.-S. (eds.), Fallacious Arguments in Ancient Philosophy, Logical Analysis and the History of Philosophy, 15: 323–42.
Duncombe, M. (2013) ‘The Greatest Difficulty at Parmenides 133C-134E and Plato’s Relative Terms’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 45: 4362.
Düring, I. (1968) ‘Aristotle’s Use of Examples in the Topics’, in Owen, G. E. L. (ed.), Aristotle on Dialectic, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 202209.
Dye, G. and Vitrac, B. (2009) ‘Le Contre les géomètres de Sextus Empiricus: sources, cible, structure’, Phronesis 54: 155203.
Ellis, J. (1994) ‘Alexander’s Defense of Aristotle’s Categories’, Phronesis, 39: 6989.
Emilsson, E. (2005) ‘Soul and μερισμός’, in Chiaradonna, R. (ed.), Studi sull’anima in Plotino, Naples: Bibliopolis, 7993.
Erler, M. (1987) Der Sinn der Aporien in den Dialogen Platons, Berlin: de Gruyter.
Fazzo, S. (2002) Aporia e sistema: La materia, la forma, il divino nelle Quaestiones di Alessandro di Afrodisia, Pisa: ETS.
Fine, G. (1979) ‘False Belief in the Theaetetus’, Phronesis, 24: 7080.
Fine, G. (1992) ‘Inquiry in the Meno’, in Kraut, R. (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Plato, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 200–26.
Fine, G. (2003), Plato on Knowledge and Forms: Selected Essays, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fine, G. (2008) ‘Does Socrates Claim to Know that He Knows Nothing?’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 35: 4985.
Fine, G. (2010) ‘Sceptical Enquiry’, in Charles, D. (ed.), Definition in Greek Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 493525.
Fine, G. (2011) ‘Sceptics and Inquiry: Sextus and the Epicureans’, in Morison, B. and Ierodiakonou, K. (eds.), Episteme, etc.: Essays in Honour of Jonathan Barnes, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 90114.
Fine, G. (2014) The Possibility of Inquiry. Meno’s Paradox from Socrates to Sextus, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Forster, M. N. (2006) ‘Socrates’ Demand for Definitions’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 31: 147.
Frede, M. (1983) ‘Stoics and Sceptics on Clear and Distinct Impressions’, in Burnyeat, M. (ed.), The Sceptical Tradition, Berkeley: University of California Press, 151–76.
Frede, M. (1992a) ‘Plato’s Arguments and the Dialogue Form’, in Klagge, J. C. and Smith, N. D. (eds.), Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Supplementary Volume: 201–220.
Frede, M. (1992b) ‘Introduction to the Protagoras’, in Lombardo, S., and Bell, K. (eds.), Plato: Protagoras, Indianapolis: Hackett, vii–xxxiv.
Frede, M. (1992c) ‘Plato’s Sophist on False Statements’, in Kraut, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plato, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 397424.
Frede, M. (1996) ‘The Literary Form of the Sophist’, in Gill, C. and McCabe, M. M. (eds.), Form and Argument in Late Plato, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 135–51.
Frede, M. (2004) ‘Aristotle’s Account of the Origins of Philosophy’, Rhizai 1: 944.
Friedländer, P. (1964) Platon, Bd. 2: Die Platonischen Schriften. Erste Periode, 3rd ed., Berlin: de Gruyter.
Furley, D. (1989) ‘Truth as What Survives the Elenchos’, in his Cosmic Problems: Essays on Greek and Roman Philosophy of Nature, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3846.
Galpérine, M.-C. (1987) Damascius, Des Premiers Principes: Apories et resolutions, Lagrasse: Editions Verdier.
Gatti, M. L. (1996) ‘Plotinus: The Platonic Tradition and the Foundation of Neoplatonism’, in Gerson, L. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1037.
Geach, P. T. (1966) ‘Plato’s Euthyphro’, The Monist 50: 369–82.
Gill, M. L. (1996) Plato Parmenides: Translated by Mary Louise Gill and Paul Ryan. Introduction by Mary Louise Gill, Indianapolis: Hackett.
Goldschmidt, V. (1947) Les dialogues de Platon: Structure et méthode dialectique, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Gonzales, F. (2002) ‘The Socratic Elenchus as Constructive Protreptic’, in Scott, G. A (ed.), Does Socrates Have a Method? Rethinking the Elenchus in Plato’s Dialogues and Beyond, State College: Pennsylvania State University Press, 161182.
Granger, H. (2004) ‘Argumentation and Heraclitus’ Book’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 26: 117.
Grgić, F. (2006) ‘Sextus Empiricus on the Goal of Skepticism’, Ancient Philosophy 26: 141–60.
Grgić, F. (2008) ‘Sextus on the Possibility of Inquiry’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89: 436–59.
Griffin, M. (1994) ‘The Composition of the Academica: Motives and Versions’, in Inwood, B. and Mansfeld, J. (eds.), Assent and Argument: Studies in Cicero’s Academic Books, Leiden: Brill, 135.
Gronewald, M. (1968) ‘Ein neues Protagoras-Fragment’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 2: 12.
Gronewald, M. and Gesché, A. (1969) (eds.) Didymus der Blinde: Psalmenkommentar (Tura-Papyrus), Teil III. Papyrologische Texte und Abhandlungen, Bd. 8, Bonn: R. Habelt.
Gurtler, G. (2015) Ennead IV.4.30–45 and IV.5, Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing.
Hagdopoulos, D. J. (1976) ‘Protasis and Problema in the Topics’, Phronesis 21: 266–76.
Halper, E. (1992) ‘The Origin of Aristotle’s Metaphysical Aporiai’, in Preus, A. and Anton, J. P. (eds.), Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy V: Aristotle’s Ontology. Albany: SUNY Press, 151–75.
Halper, E. (2009) One and Many in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Books Alpha–Delta, Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing.
Hankinson, R. (1995) The Sceptics, London: Routledge.
Hasper, P.-S. (2013) ‘Between Science and Dialectic: Aristotle’s Account of Good and Bad Peirastic Arguments in the Sophistical Refutations’, in Rapp, C. and Hasper, P.-S. (eds.), Fallacious Arguments in Ancient Philosophy, Logical Analysis and the History of Philosophy 15: 286322.
Heinemman, F. (1921), Plotin: Forschungen über die plotinische Frage, Plotins Entwicklung und sein System, Leipzig: Felix Meiner.
Henry, D. (2005) ‘Embryological Models in Ancient Philosophy’, Phronesis 50: 142.
Hiley, D. (1987) ‘The Deep Challenge of Pyrrhonian Scepticism’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 24: 185213.
Hirzel, R. (1883) Untersuchungen zu Ciceros philosophischen Schriften, Leipzig: Felix Meiner.
Hirzel, R. (1895) Der Dialog, Leipzig: Felix Meiner.
Hoffman, H. (2004) ‘Zeno’s tortoise’, Antike Kunst 47: 59.
Hoffmann, P. (1997) ‘L’expression de l’indicible dans le néoplatonisme grec, de Plotin à Damascius’, in Lévy, C. and Pernot, L. (eds.), Dire l’Évidence, Paris: Editions L’Harmattan, 335–90.
Ioppolo, A. M. (1993) ‘The Academic Position of Favorinus of Arelate’, Phronesis 38: 183213.
Ioppolo, A. M. (2009) La testimonianza di Sesto Empirico sull’accademia scettica, Naples: Bibliopolis.
Irwin, T. H. (1977) Plato’s Moral Theory: The Early and Middle Dialogues, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Irwin, T. H. (1988) Aristotle’s First Principles, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Irwin, T. H. (1995) Plato’s Ethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kahn, C. H. (1988) ‘On the Relative Date of the Gorgias and the Protagoras’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 6: 69102.
Kahn, C. H. (1996) Plato and the Socratic Dialogue, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kalligas, P. (2014) The Enneads of Plotinus. A Commentary, vol. 1, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kanayama, Y. (2011) ‘Plato as a Wayfinder: To Know Meno, the Robbery Case and the Road to Larissa’, Japan Studies in Classical Antiquity 1: 6388.
Kapp, E. (1942) Greek Foundations of Traditional Logic, New York: Columbia University Press.
Karamanolis, G. (2006) Plato and Aristotle in Agreement?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Karbowski, J. (2014) ‘Empirical Eulogos Argumentation in GA III.10’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22: 2538.
Kennedy, G. A. (1991) Aristotle, On Rhetoric. A Theory of Civic Discourse, Newly Translated, with Introduction, Notes and Appendices, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kerferd, G. B. (1955) ‘Gorgias on Nature or That Which Is Not’, Phronesis 1: 325.
Kerferd, G. B. (1981) The Sophistic Movement, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
King, R. A. H. (2009) Aristotle and Plotinus on Memory, Berlin: de Gruyter.
Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E. and Schofield, M. (1983) The Presocratic Philosophers, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Klein, J. (1965) A Commentary on Plato’s Meno, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press (reprinted by University of Chicago Press 1989).
Knuuttila, S. and Sihvola, J. (2000) ‘Ancient Scepticism and Philosophy of Religion’, in Sihvola, J. (ed.), Ancient Scepticism and the Sceptical Tradition, Acta Philosophica Fennica 66, Helsinki, 125–44.
Laks, A. (2009) ‘Aporia Zero (Metaphysics B 1, 995a24–995b4)’, in Crubellier, M. and Laks, A. (eds.), Aristotle: Metaphysics Beta. Symposium Aristotelicum, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2546.
Lee, J.-H. (2010) Der philosophische Sinn der Aporie bei Aristoteles, Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac.
Leigh, F. (2010) ‘Being and Power in Plato’s Sophist’, Apeiron 43: 6385.
Lennox, J. G. (2014) ‘Aristotle on the Emergence of Material Complexity: Meteorology IV and Aristotle’s Biology’, HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History and Philosophy of Science 4: 272305.
Leszl, W. (1975) Aristotle’s Conception of Ontology, Padua: Editrice Antenore.
Lloyd, A. (1990) The Anatomy of Neoplatonism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Long, A. A. (1984) ‘Methods of Argument in Gorgias, Palamedes’, in Boudouris, K. (ed.), The Sophistic Movement, Athens, Kardamitsa, 233–41.
Long, A. A. (1998) ‘Plato’s Apologies and Socrates in the Theaetetus’, in Gentzler, J. (ed.), Method in Ancient Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 113–36.
Machuca, D. (2006) ‘The Pyrrhonist’s Ataraxia and Philanthropia’, Ancient Philosophy 26: 111–39.
Machuca, D. (2011) ‘Ancient Skepticism: Pyrrhonism’, Philosophy Compass 6: 246–58.
Machuca, D. (2013) ‘Pyrrhonism, Inquiry, and Rationality’, Elenchos 34: 201–28.
Mackenzie, M. M. (1988a) ‘Heraclitus and the Art of Paradox’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 6: 137.
Mackenzie, M. M. (1988b) ‘Impasse and Explanation, from the Lysis to the Phaedo’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 70: 1545.
Madigan, A. (1992) Alexander of Aphrodisias On Aristotle Metaphysics 3, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Madigan, A.(1987) ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias: the Book of Ethical Problems’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt II 36 2, 1260–79.
Madigan, A. (1999) Aristotle Metaphysics Book B and Book K 1–2, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Maier, H. (1896–1900) Die Syllogistik des Aristoteles, 3 vols., Tübingen: Laupp.
Makin, S. (2005) ‘Melissus and His Opponents: The Argument of DK 30 B 8’, Phronesis 50: 263–88.
Mansfeld, J. (1981) ‘Protagoras on Epistemological Obstacles and Persons’, in Kerferd, G. B. (ed.), The Sophists and Their Legacy: Proceedings of the Fourth International Colloquium on Ancient Philosophy, Wiesbaden: F. Steiner. 3853.
Mansfeld, J. (1985) ‘Historical and Philosophical Aspects of Gorgias’ “On What Is Not”’, in Montoneri, L. and Romano, F. (eds.), Gorgia e la Sofistica, Siculorum Gymnasium 38: 243–71.
Mansfeld, J. (1995) ‘Aenesidemus and the Academics’, in Ayres, L. (ed.), The Passionate Intellect: Essays on the Transformation of the Classical Tradition Presented to Prof. I. G. Kidd, New Brunswick, 235–48.
Mansion, S. (1955) ‘Les apories de la Métaphysique aristotélicienne’, in Autour d’Aristote. Recueil d’études de philosophie ancienne et médiévale, offert à Monseigneur A. Mansion, Louvain, Publications Universitaires de Louvain, 141–79.
Marchand, S. (2010) ‘Le sceptique cherche-t-il vraiment la vérité?’, Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, 65: 125–41.
Marzolo, C. (2006) Plotino, Che cos’è l’essere vivente e che cos’è l’uomo? I. 1.[53]. Pisa.
Mates, B. (1996) The Skeptic Way; Sextus Empiricus’s Outlines of Pyrrhonism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Matthews, G. (1999a) Socratic Perplexity and the Nature of Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Matthews, G. (1999b) ‘The Normalization of Perplexity in Aristotle’, in Sim, M. (ed.), From Puzzles to Principles?: Essays on Aristotle’s Dialectic, Lanham: Lexington Books, 125–36.
McCabe, M. M. (1994) Plato’s Individuals, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
McCabe, M. M. (2000) Plato and His Predecessors: The Dramatisation of Reason, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McDowell, J. (1973) Plato, Theaetetus, translated with notes, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
McPherran, M. (1996) The Religion of Socrates, State College: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Mejer, J. (1972) ‘The Alleged New Fragment of Protagoras’, Hermes 100: 175–8.
Mette, H.-J. (1984) (ed.), ‘Zwei Akademiker heute: Krantor von Soloi und Arkesilaos von Pitane’, Lustrum 26: 794.
Mette, H.-J. (1985) (ed.), ‘Weitere Akademiker heute: von Lakydes bis zu Kleitomachos’, Lustrum 27: 39148.
Mette, H.-J. (1986–87) (ed.) ‘Philon von Larisa und Antiochos von Askalon’, Lustrum 289: 963.
Migliori, M. (1990) Dialettica e Verità: Commentario filosofico al ‘Parmenide’ di Platone, Milan: Vita e Pensiero.
Miller, M. H. (1986) Plato’s Parmenides: The Conversion of the Soul, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Moller, D. (2004) ‘The Pyrrhonian Skeptic’s Telos’, Ancient Philosophy 24: 424–41.
Moreschini, C. (1966) Platonis Parmenides Phaedrus, Rome: Ed. dell’Ateneo.
Morsink, J. (1982) Aristotle on the Generation of Animals: A Philosophical Study, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Motte, A. and Rutten, C. (2001) (eds.) Aporia dans la philosophie grecque des origins à Aristote, Louivain-la-Neuve: Peeters.
Mueller, I. (1982) ‘Geometry and Scepticism’, in Barnes, J., Brunschwig, J., Burnyeat, M. F. and Schofield, M. (eds.), Science and Speculation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 6995.
Nagel, T. (1974) ‘What Is It Like to Be a Bat?’, The Philosophical Review 83: 435–50.
Nagel, T. (1986) The View from Nowhere, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nehamas, A. (1990) ‘Eristic, Antilogic, Sophistic, Dialectic: Plato’s Demarcation of Philosophy from Sophistry’, History of Philosophy Quarterly 7: 316.
Nightingale, A. (2010) ‘Plato on Aporia and Self-Knowledge’, in Nightingale, A. and Sedley, D. (eds.), Ancient Models of Mind: Studies in Human and Divine Rationality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 826.
Noble, C. (2013) ‘How Plotinus’ Soul Animates His Body: The Argument for the Soul-Trace at Ennead 4.4.18.1–9’, Phronesis, 58: 249–79.
Notomi, N. (1999) The Unity of Plato’s Sophist: Between the Sophist and the Philosopher, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Olfert, C. M. (2015) ‘Skeptical Investigation and Its Perks: D.L. 9.66–70 and 79–89’, in Vogt, K. M. (ed.), Pyrrhonian Skepticism in Diogenes Laertius, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 147170.
O’Meara, D. (1993) Plotinus: An Introduction to the Enneads, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
O’Meara, D. (2013) Sur les traces de l’Absolu, Fribourg: Academic Press Fribourg.
Opsomer, J. (1998) In Search of the Truth: Academic Tendencies in Middle Platonism, Brussels: KAWLSK.
Owen, G. E. L. (1961) ‘Tithenai ta phainomena’, in Mansion, S. (ed.), Aristote et les problèmes de méthode, Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters, 83103.
Owen, G. E. L. (1970) ‘Notes on Ryle’s Plato’, in Wood, O. P. and Pitcher, G. (eds.), Ryle, London: Macmillan, 341–72. Repr. Owen, G. E. L. (1986), 85–103; and Fine, G. (1999) Plato I: Metaphysics and Epistemology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 298319.
Owen, G. E. L. (1986) Logic, Science and Dialectic: Collected Papers in Greek Philosophy, Nussbaum, M. (ed.), London: Duckworth.
Owens, J. (1978) The Doctrine of Being in the Aristotelian ‘Metaphysics’. A Study in the Greek Background of Mediaeval Thought, 3rd ed., Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
Palmer, J. (1999) Plato’s Reception of Parmenides, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Palmer, J. (2000) ‘Skeptical Investigation’, Ancient Philosophy 30: 351–73.
Palmer, J. (2004) ‘Melissus and Parmenides’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 26: 1954.
Palmer, J. (2009) Parmenides and Presocratic Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peck, A. L. (1942) (trans. and comm.) Aristotle: Generation of Animals, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Perin, C. (2006) ‘Pyrrhonian Scepticism and the Search for Truth’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 30: 337–60.
Perin, C. (2010) The Demands of Reason: An Essay on Pyrrhonian Scepticism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peterson, S. (1981) ‘The Greatest Difficulty for Plato’s Theory of Forms: The Unknowability Argument of Parmenides 133c–134c,’ Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 63: 116.
Pickard-Cambridge, W. A. (1984) (trans.) ‘Sophistical Refutations’, in Barnes, J. (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle, 2 vols., Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Platt, A. (1984) (trans.) ‘Generation of Animals’, in Barnes, J. (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, vol. 1, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1111–218.
Politis, Vasilis (2003) ‘Aristotle on Aporia and Searching in Metaphysics’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 18: 145–82.
Politis, Vasilis (2006) ‘Aporia and Searching in the Early Plato’, in Judson, L. and Karasmanis, V. (eds.), Remembering Socrates: Philosophical Essays, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 88109.
Politis, Vasilis (2007) ‘Is Socrates Paralyzed by His State of Aporia? Meno 79e7-80d4’, in Brisson, L. and Erler, M. (eds.), Gorgias—Menon, Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, 268–72.
Politis, Vasilis (2008) ‘The Place of Aporia in Plato’s Charmides’, Phronesis 53: 134.
Politis, Vasilis (2012a) ‘What Do the Arguments in the Protagoras Amount to?’, Phronesis 57: 209–39.
Politis, Vasilis (2012b) ‘What Is Behind the ti esti Question?’, in Fink, J. L. (ed.), The Development of Dialectic from Plato to Aristotle, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 199223.
Politis, Vasilis (2015) The Structure of Enquiry in Plato’s Early Dialogues, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Politis, V. and Su, J. (2017) ‘The Concept of Ousia in Metaphysics Alpha, Beta, and Gamma’, in Polansky, R. and Wians, W. (eds.), Reading Aristotle. Exposition and Argument, Leiden: Brill, 257276.
Polito, R. (2014) Aenesidemus of Cnossus: Testimonia, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Prantl, C. (1855) Geschichte der Logik im Abendlande, Leipzig: Verlag von S. Hirzel.
Primavesi, O. (1996) Die Aristotelische Topik: ein Interpretationsmodell und seine Erprobung am Beispiel von Topik B, München: C.H. Beck.
Primavesi, O. (2010) ‘Dialektik und Gespräch bei Aristoteles’, in Hempfer, K. W and Traninger, A (eds.), Der Dialog im Diskursfeld seiner Zeit. Von der Antike bis zur Aufklärung, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 4773.
Prior, W. J. (1998) ‘Plato and the “Socratic Fallacy”’, Phronesis 43: 97113.
Rapp, C. (2016) ‘Dialectic and Logic from a Rhetorical Point of View’, in Gourinat, J.-B. and Lemaire, J. (eds.), Logique et dialectique dans l’Antiquité, Paris: Vrin, 161192.
Rapp, C. and Wagner, T. (2013) ‘On Some Aristotelian Sources of Modern Argumentation Theory’, Argumentation 27: 730.
Rappe, S. (1998) ‘Scepticism in the Sixth Century? Damascius’ Doubts and Solutions Concerning First Principles’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 36: 337–63.
Rappe, S. (2000) Reading Neoplatonism: Non-Discursive Thinking in the Texts of Plotinus, Proclus, and Damascius, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rappe, S. (2010) Damascius’ Problems and Solutions Concerning First Principles. Translated from the Greek. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rashed, M. (2007) Essentialisme: Alexandre d’Aphrodise entre logique, physique et cosmologie, Berlin: de Gruyter.
Reale, G. (1980) The Concept of First Philosophy and the Unity of the Metaphysics of Aristotle, Albany: SUNY Press.
Reeve, C. D. C. (1989) Socrates in the Apology, Indianapolis: Hackett.
Reid, J. S. (2007) (ed.) The Academica of Cicero, London: Evergreen.
Rickless, S. C. (2007) Plato’s Forms in Transition: A Reading of the Parmenides, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rist, J. (1967) Plotinus: The Road to Reality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, R. (1942) ‘Plato’s Parmenides II’, Classical Philology 37: 159–86.
Robinson, R. (1953) Plato’s Earlier Dialectic, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rodriguez, E. (2016) Exploring Both Sides: Plato’s New Method for First Principles, doctoral dissertation, Yale University.
Ross, W. S. (1924) (ed.) Aristotle: Metaphysics: A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary, vols. 1–2, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ross, W. S (1958) Aristotelis Topica et Sophistici elenchi, rec. brevique adnotatione critica instr., Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Santas, G. X. (1972) ‘The Socratic Fallacy’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 10: 127–41.
Sayre, K. M. (1996) Parmenides’ Lesson: Translation and Explication of Plato’s Parmenides, South Bend: Notre Dame Press.
Sayre, K. M. (2005) ‘The Method Revisited: Parmenides, 135E9-136C6’, in Havlícek, A. and Karfík, F. (eds.), Plato’s Parmenides (Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium Platonicum Pragense), Prague: OIKOYMENH, 125–40.
Schofield, M. (1999) ‘Academic Epistemology’, in Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J. and Schofield, M. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 323–51.
Scolnicov, S. (2001) Plato’s Parmenides, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Scott, D. (2006) Plato’s Meno, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sedley, D. (2004) The Midwife of Platonism: Text and Subtext in Plato’s Theaetetus, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sedley, D. (2012) (ed.) The Philosophy of Antiochus, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sharples, R. W. (1985) Plato. Meno, Oxford: Aris & Phillips.
Sharples, R. W. (1987) ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias: Tradition and Innovation’, ANRW II.32.7.
Sharples, R. W. (1990) Alexander of Aphrodisias: Ethical Problems, London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Sharples, R. W. (1992) Alexander of Aphrodisias: Quaestiones 1.1–2.15, London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Sharples, R. W. (1994) Alexander of Aphrodisias: Quaestiones 2.16–3.15, London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Sharples, R. W. (2004) Alexander of Aphrodisias: Supplement On the Soul, London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Sharples, R. W. (2005) ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias on Universals: Two Problematic Texts’, Phronesis, 50: 4355.
Sharples, R. W. (2008) Alexander of Aphrodisias, Mantissa, Berlin: de Gruyter.
Smith, R. (1993) ‘Aristotle on the Uses of Dialectic’, Synthese, 96: 335–58.
Smith, R. (1997) Aristotle, Topics. Books I and VIII with Excerpts from Related Texts, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Smith, R. (1999) ‘Dialectic and Method in Aristotle’, in Sim, M. (ed.), From Puzzles to Principles?: Essays on Aristotle’s Dialectic, Lanham: Lexington Books, 3956.
Spinelli, E. (2000) ‘Sextus Empiricus, the Neighbouring Philosophies and the Sceptical Tradition’, in Sihvola, J. (ed.), Ancient Scepticism and the Sceptical Tradition, Acta Philosophica Fennica, 66: 3561.
Sprague, R. K. (1962) Plato’s Use of Fallacy. A Study of the Euthydemus and some other Dialogues, London: Routledge.
Sprague, R. K. (1973) ‘Introduction’, in Plato, Laches and Charmides, Library of Liberal Arts.
Stevens, A. (2001) ‘Aristote, Métaphysique’, in Motte, A. and Rutten, C. (eds.), Aporia dans la Philosophie grecque. Des origines à Aristote, Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters, 257–68.
Stocks, J. L. (1984) (trans.) ‘de Caelo’, in Barnes, J. (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, vol. 1, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 447511.
Striker, G. (1980) ‘Sceptical Strategies’, in Schofield, M., Burnyeat, M. and Barnes, J. (eds.), Doubt and Dogmatism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 5483.
Striker, G. (1996) ‘On the Differences Between the Pyrrhonists and the Academics’, in her own Essays in on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 135–49.
Striker, G. (2001) ‘Scepticism as a Kind of Philosophy’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 83: 113–29.
Szaif, J. (1996) Platons Begriff der Wahrheit, Freiburg/München: Alber.
Szaif, J. (2004) ‘Die Aletheia in Platons Tugendlehre’, in van Ackeren, M. (ed.), Platon Verstehen, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Tarrant, H. (1985) Scepticism or Platonism: The Philosophy of the Fourth Academy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, C. C. W. (1982) ‘The End of the Euthyphro’, Phronesis, 27: 109–18.
Taylor, D. E. (2014) ‘Pyrrhonian Skepticism, Value Nihilism and the Good of Knowledge’, Ancient Philosophy 34: 317–39.
Thorsrud, H. (2011) ‘Sextus Empiricus on Skeptical Piety’, in Machuca, D. E. (ed.), New Essays on Ancient Pyrrhonism, Philosophia Antiqua 126, Leiden: Brill, 91111.
Tsouna, V. (2015) ‘Plato’s Representations of the “Socratics”’, in Zilioli, U. (ed.), From the Socratics to the Socratic Schools, London: Routledge, 125.
Tuozzo, T. M. (2011) Plato’s Charmides. Positive Elenchus in a ‘Socratic’ Dialogue, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Ophuijsen, J. M. (2001) Alexander of Aphrodisias: On Aristotle Topics 1, London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Vlastos, G. (1967) ‘Zeno of Elea’, in Edwards, P. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 8, New York: Macmillan, 369–79.
Vlastos, G. (1991) Socrates: Ironist and Moral Philosopher, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vlastos, G. (1994a) ‘Socrates’ Disavowal of Knowledge’, in Burnyeat, M. (ed.), Socratic Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3966.
Vlastos, G. (1994b) ‘Is the “Socratic Fallacy” Socratic?’, in Burnyeat, M. (ed.), Socratic Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 6786.
Vogt, K. M. (2010) ‘Scepticism and Action’, in Bett, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 165–80.
Vogt, K. M. (2012) Belief and Truth: A Skeptic Reading of Plato, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vogt, K. M. (2015) (ed.) Pyrrhonian Skepticism in Diogenes Laertius, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Volkmann-Schluck, K. H. (1957) Plotin als Interpret der Ontologie Platons, Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann.
von Kutschera, F. (1995) Platons ‘Parmenides’, Berlin: de Gruyter.
von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. (1920) Platon, Berlin.
Wagner, T. and Rapp, C. (2004) Aristoteles, Topik. Neuübersetzung mit Kommentar und Einleitung, Ditzingen, Ditzingen: Reclam Verlag.
Warren, J. (2002) ‘Socratic Scepticism in Plutarch’s Adversus Colotem’, Elenchos 23: 333–56.
Weische, A. (1965) Cicero und die neue Akademie, Münster: Achendorf.
Westerink, L. G. and Combès, J. (1986) Damascius: Traité Des Premiers Principes, Vol. I, Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Włodarczyk, M. A. (2000) Pyrrhonian Inquiry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Woodruff, P. (1985) ‘Didymus on Protagoras and the Protagoreans’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 23: 483–97.
Woodruff, P. (1987) ‘Expert Knowledge in the Apology and Laches: What a General Needs to Know’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 3: 79115.
Woodruff, P. (1988) ‘Aporetic Pyrrhonism’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 6: 139–68.
Woodruff, P. (1990) ‘Plato’s Early Theory of Knowledge’, in Everson, S. (ed.), Epistemology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 6084.
Woodruff, P. (2010) ‘The Pyrrhonian Modes’, in Bett, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 208–31.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 47
Total number of PDF views: 553 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 1432 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 18th December 2017 - 16th July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.