References
Alvarez, L. W., Alvarez, W., Asaro, F., and Michel, H. V (1980). Extraterrestrial cause for the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction. Science, 208(4448):1095–1108.
Archibald, J. D. et al., (2010). Cretaceous extinctions: multiple causes. Science, 328(5981):973.
Bacchus, F. (1990). Representing and Reasoning with Probabilistic Knowledge: A Logical Approach to Probabilities. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, MA.
Bar-Hillel, Y. and Carnap, R. (1953). Semantic information. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 4(14):147–157.
Barnes, J., ed. (1984). The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 6th edition.
Bayes, T. (1763). An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 53:370–418.
Belot, G. (2013). Bayesian orgulity. Philosophy of Science, 80(4):483–503.
Bertrand, J. (1889). Calcul des Probabilités. Gauthier-Villars, Paris.
Birnbaum, A. (1962). On the foundations of statistical inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57(298):269–306.
Blackwell, D. and Dubins, L. (1962). Merging of opinions with increasing information. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 33(3):882–886.
Bolzano, B. (1837). Theory of Science. Blackwell, Oxford, 1972 edition. Translated by Rolf George.
Boole, G. (1854). An Investigation of the Laws of Thought: on Which Are Founded the Mathematical Theories of Logic and Probabilities. Macmillan and Co., London.
Bovens, L. and Hartmann, S. (2003). Bayesian Epistemology. Oxford University Press, New York.
Bradley, S. and Steele, K. (2014). Uncertainty, learning, and the “problem” of dilation. Erkenntnis, 79(6):1287–1303.
Brössel, P. (2015). On the role of explanatory and systematic power in scientific reasoning. Synthese, 192(12):3877–3913.
Brown, R. (1828). A brief account of microscopical observations on the particles contained in the pollen of plants; and on the general existence of active molecules in organic and inorganic bodies. Edinburgh New Philosophical Journal, 5:358–371. Page references are to Brown’s unpublished report.
Buchak, L. (2013). Belief, credence, and norms. Philosophical Studies, 169(2):285–311.
Calcott, B. (2011). Wimsatt and the robustness family: review of Wimsatt’s Re-engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings. Biology & Philosophy, 26(2):281–293.
Carnap, R. (1947). On the application of inductive logic. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 8(1):133–148.
Carnap, R. (1955). Statistical and Inductive Probability. The Galois Institute of Mathematics and Art, Brooklyn, New York, pages 279–287.
Carnap, R. (1962). Logical Foundations of Probability. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2nd edition.
Cartwright, N. (1991). Replicability, reproducibility, and robustness: comments on Harry Collins. History of Political Economy, 23(1):143–155.
Chesterton, G. K. (1908). Orthodoxy. John Lane Company, New York.
Christensen, D. (1996). Dutch-book arguments depragmatized: epistemic consistency for partial believers. The Journal of Philosophy, 93(9):450–479.
Cleland, C. E. (2011). Prediction and explanation in historical natural science. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 62(3):551–582.
Cohen, M. P. (2015). On Schupbach and Sprenger’s measures of explanatory power. Philosophy of Science, 82(1):97–109.
Cohen, M. P. (2016). On three measures of explanatory power with axiomatic representations. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 67(4):1077–1089.
Colyvan, M. (2004). The philosophical significance of Cox’s theorem. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 37(1):71–85.
Colyvan, M. (2008). Is probability the only coherent approach to uncertainty? Risk Analysis, 28(3):645–652.
Colyvan, M. (2013). Idealisations in normative models. Synthese, 190(8): 1337–1350.
Courtillot, V. and Fluteau, F. (2010). Cretaceous extinctions: the volcanic hypothesis. Science, 328(5981):973–974.
Cox, R. T. (1946). Probability, frequency and reasonable expectation. American Journal of Physics, 14(1):1–13.
Cox, R. T. (1961). The Algebra of Probable Inference. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
Crupi, V., Fitelson, B., and Tentori, K. (2008). Probability, confirmation, and the conjunction fallacy. Thinking and Reasoning, 14(2):182–199.
Crupi, V and Tentori, K. (2012). A second look at the logic of explanatory power (with two novel representation theorems). Philosophy of Science, 79(3):365–385.
Crupi, V., Tentori, K., and Gonzalez, M. (2007). On Bayesian measures of evidential support: theoretical and empirical issues. Philosophy of Science, 74(2):229–252.
Culp, S. (1994). Defending robustness: the bacterial mesosome as a test case. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1: Contributed Papers:46–57.
Darwin, C. (1872). The Origin of Species. John Murray, London, 6th edition. Page references are to the Modern Library edition, 1998.
de Finetti, B. (2017). Theory of Probability: A Critical Introductory Treatment. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Douven, I. (2013). Inference to the Best Explanation, Dutch Books, and inaccuracy minimisation. The Philosophical Quarterly, 63(252):428–444.
Douven, I. (2020). The ecological rationality of explanatory reasoning. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 79(Feb.):1–14.
Duns Scotus, J. (1998). Questions of the Metaphysics of Aristotle, Text Series, no. 19, vol. 2. Franciscan Institute Publishers, St. Bonaventure, NY.
Earman, J. (1992). Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, MA.
Easwaran, K. (2016). Conditional probability. In Hájek, A. and Hitchcock, C., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Probability and Philosophy, chapter 9, pages 167–182. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Easwaran, K. (2019). Conditional probabilities. In Pettigrew, R. and Weisberg, J., eds., The Open Handbook of Formal Epistemology, pages 131–198. PhilPapers Foundation. ISBN 978–1–9991763–0-3
Edwards, A. W. F. (1992). Likelihood: An Account of the Statistical Concept of Likelihood and Its Application to Scientific Inference. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, expanded edition. First edition published 1972.
Einstein, A. and Infeld, L. (1938). The Evolution of Physics: From Early Concepts to Relativity and Quanta. Simon & Schuster, New York.
Feldman, M. (1991). On the generic nonconvergence of Bayesian actions and beliefs. Economic Theory, 1(4):301–321.
Fitelson, B. (1996). Wayne, Horwich, and evidential diversity. Philosophy of Science, 63(4):652–660.
Fitelson, B. (1999). The plurality of Bayesian measures of confirmation and the problem of measure sensitivity. Philosophy of Science, 66(Supp.):S362-S378.
Fitelson, B. (2001a). A Bayesian account of independent evidence with applications. Philosophy of Science, 68(3):S123-S140.
Fitelson, B. (2001b). Studies in Bayesian Confirmation Theory. PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin – Madison.
Forster, M. R. and Sober, E. (1994). How to tell when simpler, more unified, or less ad hoc theories will provide more accurate predictions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 45:1–35.
Gaifman, H. and Snir, M. (1982). Probabilities over rich languages, testing and randomness. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 47(3):495–548.
Garber, D. (1983). Old evidence and logical omniscience in Bayesian confirmation theory. In Earman, J., ed., Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. X, pages 99–131. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Garwood, C. (2008). Flat Earth: The History of an Infamous Idea. Thomas Dunne Books, New York.
Glass, D. H. (2012). Inference to the Best Explanation: does it track truth? Synthese, 185:411–427.
Glass, D. H. (2016). Science, God and Ockham’s razor. Philosophical Studies, 174(5):1145–1161
Glass, D. H. (2021). Information and explanatory goodness. Unpublished manuscript.
Glymour, C. (1980). Theory and Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Good, I. J. (1960). Weight of evidence, corroboration, explanatory power, information and the utility of experiments. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 22(2):319–331.
Good, I. J. (1966). A derivation of the probabilistic explication of information. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 28(3):578–581.
Good, I. J. (1968). Corroboration, explanation, evolving probability, simplicity and a sharpened razor. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 19(2):123–143.
Hacking, I. (1965). Logic of Statistical Inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and Intervening. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hacking, I. (2006). The Emergence of Probability: A Philosophical Study of the Early Ideas About Probability, Induction, and Statistical Inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2nd edition.
Haenni, R., Romeijn, J.-W., Wheeler, G., and Williamson, J. (2010). Probabilistic Logic and Probabilistic Networks. The Synthese Library. Springer, Dordrecht.
Hájek, A. (2003). What conditional probability could not be. Synthese, 137:273–323.
Hájek, A. (2009). What conditional probability also could not be: reply to Kenny Easwaran. Unpublished.
Halpern, J. Y. (1999a). A counterexample to theorems of Cox and Fine. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 10(1):67–85.
Halpern, J. Y. (1999b). Cox’s theorem revisited. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 11:429–435.
Harman, G. H. (1965). The inference to the best explanation. Philosophical Review, 74(1):88–95.
Hempel, C. G. (1945). Studies in the logic of confirmation II. Mind, 54(214):97–121.
Hempel, C. G. (1965). Aspects of Scientific Explanation. In Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, pages 331–496. Free Press, New York.
Hempel, C. G. and Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15(2):135–175.
Hildebrand et al, A. R. (1991). Chicxulub crater: a possible Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary impact crater on the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Geology, 19:867–871.
Horgan, T. (2017). Troubles for Bayesian formal epistemology. Res Philosophica, 94(2):233–255.
Horwich, P. (1982). Probability and Evidence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Howson, C. (2000). Hume’s Problem: Induction and the Justification of Belief. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Howson, C. (2011). Bayesianism as a pure logic of inference. In Bandyopad-hyay, P. S. and Forster, M. R., (eds.), Philosophy of Statistics, volume 7 of Handbook of Philosophy of Science, pages 441–471. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Howson, C. and Urbach, P. (2006). Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach. Open Court, Peru, IL, 3rd edition.
Jaynes, E. T. (1957). Information theory and statistical mechanics. Physical Review, 106(4):620–630.
Jaynes, E. T. (2003). Probability Theory: The Logic of Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Jeffrey, R. (2004). Subjective Probability: The Real Thing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Jeffrey, R. C. (1983a). Bayesianism with a human face. In Earman, J., (ed.), Testing Scientific Theories, volume X, pages 133–156. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Jeffrey, R. C. (1983b). The Logic of Decision. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2nd edition.
Jeffreys, H. (1939). Theory of Probability. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Joyce, J. M. (1998). A nonpragmatic vindication of Probabilism. Philosophy of Science, 65(4):575–603.
Joyce, J. M. (2009). Accuracy and Coherence: Prospects for an Alethic Epistemology of Partial Belief. In Huber, F. and Schmidt-Petri, C., (eds.), Degrees of Belief, vol. 342 of Synthese Library, pages 263–297. Springer, New York.
Joyce, J. M. (2010). A defense of imprecise credences in inference and decision making. Philosophical Perspectives, 24(1):281–323.
Keller, G., Adatte, T., Pardo, A. et al. (2010). Cretaceous extinctions: evidence overlooked. Science, 328(5981):974–975.
Kelly, K. T. (2011). Simplicity, truth, and probability. In Bandyopadhyay, P. S. and Forster, M. R., (eds.), Philosophy of Statistics, vol. 7 of Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, pages 983–1024. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Kelly, K. T., Schulte, O., and Juhl, C. (1997). Learning theory and the philosophy of science. Philosophy of Science, 64(2):245–267.
Keynes, J. M. (1921). A Treatise on Probability. Macmillan, London.
Kimhi, I. (2018). Thinking and Being. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Kolmogorov, A. N. (1933). Foundations of the Theory of Probability. Chelsea Publishing Company, New York.
Kuorikoski, J., Lehtinen, A., and Marchionni, C. (2010). Economic modelling as robustness analysis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61(3):541–567.
Kyburg, H. E. (1961). Probability and the Logic of Rational Belief. Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, CT.
Kyburg, H. E. (1976). Chance. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 5(3):355–393.
Kyburg, H. E. (1977). Randomness and the right reference class. The Journal of Philosophy, 74(9):501–521.
Kyburg, H. E. (1980). Conditionalization. The Journal of Philosophy, 77(2):98–114.
Kyburg, H. E. (1983). Levi, Petersen, and direct inference. Philosophy of Science, 50(4):630–634.
Kyburg, H. E. (2003). Don’t take unnecessary chances! In Kyburg, H. E. and Thalos, M., (eds.), Probability Is the Very Guide of Life: The Philosophical Uses of Chance, pages 277–294. Open Court, La Salle, IL.
Kyburg, H. E. and Teng, C. M. (2001). Uncertain Inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Laplace, P.-S. (1814). A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities. Chapman & Hall, Limited, London.
Leitgeb, H. (2013). Reducing belief simpliciter to degrees of belief. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 164(12):1338–1389.
Leitgeb, H. and Pettigrew, R. (2010a). An objective justification of Bayesianism I: measuring inaccuracy. Philosophy of Science, 77(2):201–235.
Leitgeb, H. and Pettigrew, R. (2010b). An objective justification of Bayesianism II: the consequences of minimizing inaccuracy. Philosophy of Science, 77(2):236–272.
Levi, I. (1977). Direct inference. The Journal of Philosophy, 74(1):5–29.
Levi, I. (1978). Confirmational conditionalization. The Journal of Philosophy, 75(12):730–737.
Levi, I. (1980). The Enterprise of Knowledge: An Essay on Knowledge, Credal Probability, and Chance. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, MA.
Levi, I. (1981). Direct inference and confirmational conditionalization. Philosophy of Science, 48(4):532–552.
Levi, I. (1987). The demons of decision. The Monist, 70(2):193–211.
Levi, I. (2004). The logic of consistency and the logic of truth. Dialectica, 58(4, Special issue: Ramsey):461–482.
Levins, R. (1966). The strategy of model building in population biology. American Scientist, 54(4):421–431.
Lewis, D. (1976). Probabilities of conditionals and conditional probabilities. The Philosophical Review, 85(3):297–315.
Lewis, D. (1980). A subjectivist’s guide to objective chance. In Jeffrey, R. C., (ed.), Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, pages 263–293. University of California Press, Berkeley.
Lindberg, D. C. (2007). The Beginnings of Western Science: The European Scientific Tradition in Philosophical, Religious, and Institutional Context, Prehistory to A.D. 1450. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2nd edition.
Lipton, P. (2004). Inference to the Best Explanation. Routledge, New York, 2nd edition.
Lloyd, E. A. (2009). Varieties of support and confirmation of climate models. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 83:213–232.
Lloyd, E. A. (2010). Confirmation and robustness of climate models. Philosophy of Science, 77(5):971–984.
Maher, P. (1993). Betting on Theories. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Mayo, D. G. (1996). Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
McGrew, L. (2010). Probability kinematics and probability dynamics. Journal of Philosophical Research, 35:89–105.
McGrew, L. (2014). Jeffrey conditioning, rigidity, and the defeasible red jelly bean. Philosophical Studies, 168:569–582.
McGrew, L. (2016). Evidential diversity and the negation of H: a probabilistic account of the value of varied evidence. Ergo, 3(10):263–292.
McGrew, T. (2003). Confirmation, heuristics, and explanatory reasoning. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 54(4):553–567.
McMullin, E. (1992). The Inference That Makes Science. Marquette University Press, Milwaukee, WI.
of Ockham, W. (1986). Tractatus de Corpore Christi, volume X of Opera Theologica. Franciscan Institute Publishers, St. Bonaventure, NY.
Parker, W. S. (2011). When climate models agree: the significance of robust model predictions. Philosophy of Science, 78(4):579–600.
Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco.
Pedersen, A. P. and Wheeler, G. (2014). Demystifying dilation. Erkenntnis, 79(6):1305–1342.
Peirce, C. S. (1878). Deduction, induction, and hypothesis. Popular Science Monthly, 13(Aug.):470–482.
Peirce, C. S. (1883). A theory of probable inference. In Studies in Logic by Members of the Johns Hopkins University, pages 126–181. Little, Brown, and Company, Boston, MA.
Peirce, C. S. (1893). Reply to the necessitarians: rejoinder to Dr Carus. The Monist, 3(4):526–570.
Peirce, C. S. (1931–5). The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. I-VI. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Peirce, C. S. (1958). The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. VII-VIII. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Perrin, J. (1913). Les Atomes. Ox Bow Press, Woodbridge, CT. Translated by D. Ll. Hammick.
Pettigrew, R. (2016). Accuracy and the Laws of Credence. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Pettigrew, R. (2019). Epistemic utility arguments for Probabilism. In Zalta, E. N., editor, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, winter 2019 edition.
Pettigrew, R. and Titelbaum, M. G. (2014). Deference done right. Philosophers’ Imprint, 14(35):1–19.
Plutynski, A. (2006). Strategies of model building in population genetics. Philosophy of Science, 73(5):755–764.
Pollock, J. L. (1987). Defeasible reasoning. Cognitive Science, 11(4):481–518.
Pollock, J. L. (1990). Nomic Probability and the Foundations of Induction. Oxford University Press, New York.
Popper, K. R. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchinson, London.
Priest, G. (1979). The logic of paradox. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8(1):219–241.
Priest, G. (2002). Inconsistency and the empirical sciences. In Meheus, J. (ed.), Inconsistency in Science, pages 119–128. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
Priest, G. (2006). Doubt Truth to Be a Liar. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Ramsey, F. P. (1926). Truth and Probability. In Mellor, D. H. (ed.), Philosophical Papers, pages 52–94. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Edited collection published in 1990.
Reichenbach, H. (1949). The Theory of Probability. University of California Press, Berkeley.
Renne, P. R., Sprain, C. J., Richards, M. A. et al. (2015). State shift in Deccan volcanism at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary, possibly induced by impact. Science, 350(6256):76–78.
Rosenkrantz, R. D. (1981). Foundations and Applications of Inductive Probability. Ridgeview Press, Atascadero, CA.
Royall, R. (1997). Statistical Evidence: A Likelihood Paradigm. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton, FL.
Russell, J. B. (1991). Inventing the Flat Earth: Columbus and Modern Historians. Praeger, Westport, CT.
Savage, L. J. (1954). The Foundations of Statistics. Wiley, New York. Page references are to the 1972 Dover edition.
Schulte et al., P. (2010). The Chicxulub asteroid impact and mass extinction at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary. Science, 327(5970):1214–1218.
Schupbach, J. N. (2011a). Comparing probabilistic measures of explanatory power. Philosophy of Science, 78(5):813–829.
Schupbach, J. N. (2011b). Studies in the Logic of Explanatory Power. PhD thesis, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.
Schupbach, J. N. (2015). Robustness, diversity of evidence, and probabilistic independence. In Mäki, U., Votsis, I., Ruphy, S., and Schurz, G. (ed.) Recent Developments in the Philosophy of Science: EPSA13 Helsinki, pages 305–316. Springer, Dordrecht.
Schupbach, J. N. (2016). Competing explanations and explaining-away arguments. Theology and Science, 14(3):256–267.
Schupbach, J. N. (2017). Inference to the Best Explanation, cleaned up and made respectable. In McCain, K. and Poston, T. (eds.), Best Explanations: New Essays on Inference to the Best Explanation, pages 39–61. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Schupbach, J. N. (2018). Robustness analysis as explanatory reasoning. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 69(1):275–300.
Schupbach, J. N. and Glass, D. H. (2017). Hypothesis competition beyond mutual exclusivity. Philosophy of Science, 84(5):810–824.
Schupbach, J. N. and Sprenger, J. (2011). The logic of explanatory power. Philosophy of Science, 78(1):105–127.
Seidenfeld, T. (1979). Why I am not an objective Bayesian: some reflections prompted by Rosenkrantz. Theory and Decision, 11:413–440.
Seidenfeld, T. (1986). Entropy and uncertainty. Philosophy of Science, 53(4):467–491.
Seidenfeld, T. and Wasserman, L. (1993). Dilation for sets of probabilities. The Annals of Statistics, 21(3):1139–1154.
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27(July):379–423, 623–656.
Shimony, A. (1985). The status of the principle of maximum entropy. Synthese, 63(1):35–53.
Skyrms, B. (1985). Maximum entropy inference as a special case of condition-alization. Synthese, 63(1):55–74.
Sober, E. (2008). Evidence and Evolution: The Logic Behind the Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Sober, E. (2009). Parsimony arguments in science and philosophy - a test case for naturalism. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 83(2):117–155.
Sober, E. (2015). Ockham’s Razors: A User’s Manual. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Sober, E. (2019). The Design Argument. Elements in the Philosophy of Religion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Sprenger, J. and Hartmann, S. (2019). Bayesian Philosophy of Science. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Stegenga, J. (2009). Robustness, discordance, and relevance. Philosophy of Science, 76(5):650–661.
Stegenga, J. and Menon, T. (2017). Robustness and independent evidence. Philosophy of Science, 84(3):414–435.
Stolarz-Fantino, S., Fantino, E., Zizzo, D. J., and Wen, J. (2003). The conjunction effect: new evidence for robustness. The American Journal of Psychology, 116(1):15–34.
Tentori, K., Crupi, V, Bonini, N., and Osherson, D. (2007). Comparison of confirmation measures. Cognition, 103(1):107–119.
Thorn, P. D. (2012). Two problems of direct inference. Erkenntnis, 76(3):299–318.
Titelbaum, M. G. (2013). Quitting Certainties: A Bayesian Framework Modeling Degrees of Belief. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
van Fraassen, B. C. (1984). Belief and the will. The Journal of Philosophy, 81(5):235–256.
van Fraassen, B. C. (1989). Laws and Symmetry. Oxford University Press, New York.
Vineberg, S. (2016). Dutch book arguments. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, spring 2016 edition.
Weisberg, M. and Reisman, K. (2008). The robust Volterra principle. Philosophy of Science, 75(1):106–131.
Wheeler, G. and Williamson, J. (2011). Evidential probability and objective Bayesian epistemology. In Bandyopadhyay, P. S. and Forster, M. R. (eds.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, vol. 7: Philosophy of Statistics, pages 307–331. Elsevier Science & Technology.
Williamson, J. (2007). Motivating Objective Bayesianism: From Empirical Constraints to Objective Probabilities. In Harper, W. and Wheeler, G. (eds.), Probability and Inference: Essays in Honour of Henry E. Kyburg Jr., pages 151–179. College Publications, London.
Williamson, J. (2010). In Defence of Objective Bayesianism. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Williamson, J. (2011). Objective Bayesianism, Bayesian conditionalisation, and voluntarism. Synthese, 178(1):67–85.
Williamson, J. (2017). Lectures on Inductive Logic. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Wimsatt, W. C. (1981). Robustness, reliability, and overdetermination. In Brewer, M. B. and Collins, B. E. (eds.), Scientific Inquiry and the Social Sciences, pages 125–163. Jossey-Bass. Page references are to the version reprinted in (Wimsatt, 2007).
Wimsatt, W. C. (1994). The ontology of complex systems: Levels of organization, perspectives, and causal thickets. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 24(sup1):207–274. Page references are to the version reprinted in (Wimsatt, 2007).
Wimsatt, W. C. (2007). Re-Engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Wimsatt, W. C. (2011). Robust re-engineering: a philosophical account? Biology & Philosophy, 26(2):295–303.
Winsberg, E. (2018). Philosophy and Climate Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Routledge, Abingdon, 1974 edition. Translated by D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuiness.
Woodward, J. (2006). Some varieties of robustness. Journal of Economic Methodology, 13(2):219–240.
