References
Aarøe, L. (2011). Investigating frame strength: The case of episodic and thematic frames. Political Communication, 28(2), 207–226.
Allcott, H., and Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236.
Allport, G. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.
Ammons, D. N., and Roenigk, D. J.. (2015). Benchmarking and interorganizational learning in local government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 309–335.
Andersen, S. C., and Hjortskov, M. (2015). Cognitive biases in performance evaluations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(4), 647–662.
Andersen, S. C., Holm, J, and Jakobsen, M. L.. (2018). Informing a blame game? How political accountability Impacts the Processing of Performance Feedback. Unpublished paper.
Andersen, S. C., and Moynihan, D. P.. (2016). Bureaucratic investments in expertise: Evidence from a randomized controlled field trial. The Journal of Politics, 78(4), 1032–1044.
Andersen, S. C., and Moynihan, D. P.. (2018). How do socially distinctive newcomers fare? Evidence from a field experiment. Public Administration Review, 78(6), 874–882.
Baekgaard, M., Christensen, J, Dahlmann, C, Mathiasen, A, and Petersen, N. (2019). The role of evidence in politics: Motivated reasoning and persuasion among politicians. British Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 1117–1140.
Baekgaard, M., and Serritzlew, S. (2016). Interpreting performance information: Motivated reasoning or unbiased comprehension. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 73–82.
Banuri, S., Dercon, S, and Gauri, V. (2017). Biased Policy Professionals, Policy Research Working Paper No. 8113. Washington DC: The World Bank.
Bar-Hillel, M. (1980). The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments. Acta Psychologica, 44(3), 211–233.
Barrett, L. F. (2017). How Emotions are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Barrows, S., Henderson, M, Peterson, P. E., and West, M. R.. (2016). Relative performance information and perceptions of public service quality: Evidence from American school districts. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(3), 571–583.
Barthel, M., and Mitchell, A. (2017). Americans’ attitudes about the news media deeply divided along partisan lines. Pew Research Center, 10, p.49.
Baybeck, B., and McClurg, S. D. (2005). What do they know and how do they know it? An examination of citizen awareness of context. American Politics Research, 33(4), 492–520.
Belardinelli, P., Bellé, N, Sicilia, M, and Steccolini, I. (2018). Framing effects under different uses of performance information: An experimental study on public managers. Public Administration Review, 78(6), 841–851.
Bellé, N., Cantarelli, P, and Belardinelli, P. (2017). Cognitive biases in performance appraisal: Experimental evidence on anchoring and halo effects with public sector managers and employees. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(3), 275–294.
Bellé, N., Cantarelli, P, and Belardinelli, P. (2018). Prospect theory goes public: Experimental evidence on cognitive biases in public policy and management decisions. Public Administration Review, 78(6), 828–840.
Bizer, G. Y., and Schindler, R. M.. (2005). Direct evidence of ending-digit drop-off in price information processing. Psychology & Marketing, 22(10), 771–783.
Blatz, C. W., and Mercier, B. (2017). False polarization and false moderation: Political opponents overestimate the extremity of each other’s ideologies but underestimate each other’s certainty. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(5), 521–529.
Bouwman, R., Van Thiel, S, van Deemen, A, and Rouwette, E. (2018). Accountability and coalitions: Evidence from a negotiation experiment. Public Administration Review, 78(1), 37–47.
Boyne, G. A., James, O, John, P, and Petrovsky, N. (2009). Democracy and government performance: Holding incumbents accountable in English local governments. The Journal of Politics, 71(4), 1273–1284.
Boyne, G. A., James, O, John, P, and Petrovsky, N. (2010). Does public service performance affect top management turnover? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(suppl. 2), i261–i279.
Brickman, P., and Campbell, D. T.. (1971). Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In Apley, M. H., Adaptation-Level Theory: A Symposium. Michigan: Academic Press, pp. 287–305.
Brunell, T. L, and Glazer, A. (2001). Rational response to irrational attitudes: The level of the gasoline tax in the United States. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20(4), 761–764.
Bullock, J. G., Gerber, A. S., Hill, S. J., and Huber, G. A.. (2015). Partisan bias in factual beliefs about politics. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 10(4), 519–578.
Campbell, D. T. (1979). Assessing the impact of planned social change. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2(1), 67–90.
Cantarelli, P., Belle, N, and Belardinelli, P. (2018). Behavioral public HR: Experimental evidence on cognitive biases and debiasing interventions. Review of Public Personnel Administration.
Charbonneau, E & Bellavance, F.. (2012). Blame Avoidance in Public Reporting, Public Performance & Management Review, 35(3), 399–421
Charbonneau, É., and Van Ryzin, G. G.. (2015). Benchmarks and citizen judgments of local government performance: Findings from a survey experiment. Public Management Review, 17(2), 288–304.
Christensen, J. (2018). Biased, not blind: An experimental test of self‐serving biases in service users’ evaluations of performance information. Public Administration, 96(3), 468–480.
Christensen, J., Dahlmann, C. M., Mathiasen, A. H., Moynihan, D. P., and Petersen, N. B. G.. (2018). How do elected officials evaluate performance? Goal preferences, governance preferences, and the process of goal reprioritization. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(2), 197–211.
Christensen, J., and James, O. (2018). Public Reporting of Multidimensional Performance: Order Effects on Citizens’ Perceptions and Judgment. Paper presented to European Consortium for Political Research Conference, University of Hamburg.
Cohen, G. L. (2003). Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 808–822.
Craig, S. G., Imberman, S. and Perdue, A.. (2015). Do administrators respond to their accountability ratings? The response of school budgets to accountability grades. Economics of Education Review, 49(C), 55–68.
Cucciniello, M., Porumbescu, G. A., and Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2017). 25 years of transparency research: Evidence and future directions. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 32–44.
Cyert, R. M., and March, J. G.. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Daschmann, G. (2000). Vox pop & polls: The impact of poll results and voter statements in the media on the perception of a climate of opinion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12(2),160–181.
Dao, James and Lehren, A. W.. (2010). Grim Milestone: 1,000 Americans Dead. New York Times. May 19, A11.
Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., and Ryan, R. M.. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 19–43.
Dehaene, S. (2011). The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. New York: Oxford University Press USA.
Dehaene, S., and Mehler, J. (1992). Cross-linguistic regularities in the frequency of number words. Cognition, 43(1), 1–29.
Delli Carpini, M. X., and Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Demaj, L. (2017). What can performance information do to legislators? A budget‐decision experiment with legislators. Public Administration Review, 77(3), 366–379.
Dorogovtsev, S. N., Mendes, J. F. F., and Oliveira, J. G.. (2006). Frequency of occurrence of numbers in the World Wide Web. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 360(2), 548–556.
Druckman, J. N. (2001). The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior, 23(3), 225–256.
Druckman, J. N. (2011). What’s it all about?: Framing in political science. In Keren, G, Perspectives on Framing. New York: Taylor and Francis, pp. 297–302.
Druckman, J. N., Peterson, E, and Slothuus, R. (2013). How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation. American Political Science Review, 107(1), 57–79.
Duflo, E. (2017). The economist as plumber. American Economic Review, 107(5), 1–26.
Dunning, D. (1999). A newer look: Motivated social cognition and the schematic representation of social concepts. Psychological Inquiry, 10(1), 1–11.
European Union. (2018). Standard Eurobarometer Spring 2018: Public opinion in the European Union, p. 12.
Epp, C. R., Maynard-Moody, S, and Haider-Markel, D. P.. (2014). Pulled Over: How Police Stops Define Race and Citizenship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140.
Freeman, R. A. (1954). How can voters understand? National Civic Review, 43(3), 123–129.
Fuenzalida, J., Van Ryzin, G. G., and Olsen, A. L. (forthcoming). Are managers susceptible to framing effects? An experimental study of professional judgment of performance metrics. International Public Management Journal.
Gailmard, S., and Patty, J. W.. (2012). Learning While Governing: Expertise and Accountability in the Executive Branch. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
George, B., Desmidt, S, Nielsen, P. A., and Baekgaard, M. (2017). Rational planning and politicians’ preferences for spending and reform: Replication and extension of a survey experiment. Public Management Review, 19(9), 1251–1271.
Gerrish, E. (2016). The Impact of Performance Management on Performance in Public Organizations: A Meta-Analysis. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 48–66.
Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious. New York: Viking.
Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., and ABC Research Group 2000. (2001). Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gigone, D., and Hastie, R. (1993). The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6(5), 959–974.
Goodsell, C. T. (1994). The Case for Bureaucracy: a Public Administration Polemic. Chatham: Chatham House Publishers Inc.
Greenwald, A. G., and Banaji, M. R.. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological review, 102(1), 4.
Greve, H. R. (1998). Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(1), 58–86.
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Jilke, S, Olsen, A. L., and Tummers, L. (2017). Behavioral public administration: Combining insights from public administration and psychology. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 45–56.
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., and Porumbescu, G. A.. (2017). Reconsidering the expectancy disconfirmation model: Three experimental replications. Public Management Review, 19(9), 1272–1292.
Gross, K. (2008). Framing persuasive appeals: Episodic and thematic framing, emotional response, and policy opinion. Political Psychology, 29(2), 169–192.
Grosso, A. L., and Van Ryzin, G. G.. (2011). How citizens view government performance reporting: Results of a national survey. Public Performance & Management Review, 35(2), 235–250.
Guess, A. and Coppock, A. (forthcoming). Does Counter-Attitudinal Information Cause Backlash? Results from Three Large Survey Experiments. British Journal of Political Science, 1–19.
Hansen, J. A., and Nielsen, P. A.. (2018). How Does Performance Information Influence Management Decision Making? Experimental Evidence on Problem Identification, Innovative Search, and Change. Paper to be presented at the Annual EGPA Conference, Lausanne, Switzerland, Sept. 5–7.
Hansen, K. M., Olsen, A. L., and Bech, M. (2015). Cross-national yardstick comparisons: A choice experiment on a forgotten voter heuristic. Political Behavior, 37(4), 767–789.
Harris, L. (1991). Stock price clustering and discreteness. The Review of Financial Studies, 4(3), 389–415.
Hatry, H. P. (2006). Performance measurement: Getting results. The Urban Insitute.
Hatry, H.P. (1999). Performance Measurement: Getting Results.Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
Head, B. W. (2008). Wicked problems in public policy. Public policy, 3(2), 101.
Heath, C. (1999). Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 38(1), 79–109.
Herbst, S. (1993). Numbered Voices: How Opinion Polling Has Shaped American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Herr, P. M., Kardes, F. R., and Kim, J. (1991). Effects of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4), 454–462.
Hetherington, M. J. (2005). Why Trust Matters: Declining Political Trust and the Demise of American Liberalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hinrichs, J. V., Berie, J. L., and Mosell, M. K.. (1982). Place information in multidigit number comparison. Memory & Cognition, 10(5), 487–495.
Holbein, J. (2016) Left Behind? Citizen Responsiveness to Government Performance Information, 110 (2), 353–368.
Holm, J. (2017). Double standards: How historical and political aspiration level guide managerial performance information use. Public Administration, 95(4), 1026–1040.
Holm, J. (2018). Successful problem solvers? Managerial performance information use to improve low organizational performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(3), 303–320.
Hood, C. (2006). Gaming in targetworld: The targets approach to managing British public services. Public Administration Review, 66(4), 515–521.
Hood, C. (2010). The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy, and Self-Preservation in Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hood, C., James, O., Scott, C., Jones, G. W., and Travers, T. (1999). Regulation Inside Government: Waste Watchers, Quality Police, and Sleaze-Busters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hong, S. (2019). A behavioral model of public organizations: Performance feedback and negativity bias. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(1), 1–17.
Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., and Kelley, H. H.. (1953). Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Hvidman, U. (2019). Citizens’ Evaluations of the Public Sector: Evidence From Two Large-Scale Experiments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(2), 255–267.
Hvidman, U., and Andersen, S. C.. (2016). Perceptions of public and private performance: Evidence from a survey experiment. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 111–120.
Jackson, P. M. (2011). Governance by numbers: What have we learned over the past 30 years? Public Money & Management, 31(1), 13–26.
Jakobsen, M., James, O., Moynihan, D., & Nabatchi, T. (2019). JPART virtual issue on citizen-state interactions in public administration research Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. Pages e8–e15, https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muw031
Jakobsen, M. L. F. and , P. B.. (2016) Rules and the Doctrine of Performance Management. Public Administration Review, 76(2), 302–312.
James, O. (2004). The UK core executive’s use of public service agreements as a tool of governance. Public administration, 82(2), 397–419.
James, O. (2007). Evaluating the expectations disconfirmation and expectations anchoring approaches to citizen satisfaction with local public services. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(1), 107–123.
James, O. (2011a). Performance measures and democracy: Information effects on citizens in field and laboratory experiments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), 399–418.
James, O. (2011b). Managing citizens’ expectations of public service performance: Evidence from observation and experimentation in local government. Public Administration, 89(4), 1419–1435.
James, O., Jilke, S, Petersen, C, and Van de Walle, S. (2016). Citizens’ blame of politicians for public service failure: Experimental evidence about blame reduction through delegation and contracting. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 83–93.
James, O., Jilke, S, and Van Ryzin, G. G., eds. (2017) Experiments in Public Management Research: Challenges and Contributions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
James, O., and Moseley, A. (2014). Does performance information about public services affect citizens’ perceptions, satisfaction, and voice behaviour? Field experiments with absolute and relative performance information. Public Administration, 92(2), 493–511.
James, O., and Petersen, C. (2018). International rankings of government performance and source credibility for citizens: Experiments about e-government rankings in the UK and the Netherlands. Public Management Review, 20(4), 469–484.
James, O., and Van Ryzin, G. G.. (2017a). Incredibly good performance: An experimental study of source and level effects on the credibility of government. American Review of Public Administration, 47(1), 23–35.
James, O., and Van Ryzin, G. G.. (2017b) Motivated reasoning about public performance: An experimental study of how citizens judge the affordable care act. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(1), 197–209.
James, O., and Van Ryzin, G. G.. (2019). Rates and the judgment of government performance. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 2(2), https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.22.41. James, O., and John, P.,. (2007). Public Management at the Ballot Box: Performance Information and Electoral Support for Incumbent English Local Governments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(4), 567–580.
Janis, I. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes, 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Jenni, K., and Loewenstein, G. (1997). Explaining the identifiable victim effect. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14(3), 235–257.
Joshi, A., and Roh, H. (2009). The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 987–1015.
Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A., and Gosling, S. D.. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(2), 126–136.
Kahan, D. M. (2013). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(4), 407–424.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47(2), 263–291.
Katz, D., Gutek, B. A., Kahn, R. L., and Barton, E. (1977). Bureaucratic Encounters: A Pilot Study in the Evaluation of Government Services. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
Kelley, J. D., and Simmons, B. A.. (2015). Politics by number: Indicators as social pressure in international relations. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 55–70.
Kelman, H. C., and Hovland, C. I.. (1953). “Reinstatement” of the communicator in delayed measurement of opinion change. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48(3), 327.
Kogan, V., Lavertu, S., and Peskowitz, Z.. (2016). Do School Report Cards Produce Accountability Through the Ballot Box? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 35(3), 639–661.
Kogut, T., and Ritov, I. (2005). The identified victim effect: An identified group, or just a single individual? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18(3), 157–167.
Kroll, A. (2013). The other type of performance information: Nonroutine feedback, its relevance and use. Public Administration Review, 73(2), 265–276.
Kroll, A. (2015). Drivers of performance information use: Systematic literature review and directions for future research. Public Performance and Management Review, 38(3), 459–486.
Kruglanski, A. W. (1996). Motivated social cognition: Principles of the interface. In Kruglanski, A. W. and Higgins, E. T., eds., Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, New York: Guilford, pp. 493–520.
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498.
Larsen, M. V. and Olsen, A. L. (2020): Reducing Bias in Citizens’ Perception of Crime Rates: Evidence From a Field Experiment on Burglary Prevalence. Journal of Politics, 82(2).
Lee, I., Herda, T, and Jilke, S. (2018). Pro-Private or Anti-Public Sector Bias? The Impact of Organizational Ownership on Citizens’ Performance Perceptions. Research Paper.
Levin, I. P., and Gaeth, G. J.. (1988). How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), 374–378.
Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., and Gaeth, G. J.. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2), 149–188.
Levy, Jack S. (1997). Prospect Theory, Rational Choice, and International Relations. International Studies Quarterly, 41(1), 87–112.
Lieberman, M. D. (2013). Social: Why Our Brains Are Wired to Connect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Lodge, M., and Taber, C. S.. (2013). The Rationalizing Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Loewenstein, George & Prelec, Drazen. (1998). The Red and the Black: Mental Accounting of Savings and Debt. Marketing Science, 17(1), 4–28.
Malhotra, N., and Kuo, A. G.. (2008). Attributing blame: The public’s response to Hurricane Katrina. Journal of Politics, 70(1), 120–135.
Marvel, J. D. (2016). Unconscious bias in citizens’ evaluations of public sector performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(1), 143–158.
Marvel, J. D. (2015). Public opinion and public sector performance: Are individuals’ beliefs about performance evidence-based or the product of anti–public sector bias? International Public Management Journal, 18(2), 209–227.
Marvel, J. D., and Girth, A. M.. (2016). Citizen attributions of blame in third‐party governance. Public Administration Review 76(1), 96–108.
McCaffery, E. J., and Baron, J. (2003). The Humpty Dumpty blues: Disaggregation bias in the evaluation of tax systems. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 230–242.
Meier, K. J., Favero, N, and Zhu, L. (2015). Performance gaps and managerial decisions: A Bayesian decision theory of managerial action. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1221–1246.
Merwin, F. E. (1942). The reporting of public affairs. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 219(1), 120–126.
Mintzberg, H. (1973). The Nature of Managerial Work. New York: Harper & Row.
Mondak, J. J. (1993). Public opinion and heuristic processing of source cues. Political Behavior, 15(2), 167–192.
Moynihan, D. P. (2008). The Dynamics of Performance Management: Constructing Information and Reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Moynihan, D. P. (2015). Uncovering the circumstances of performance information use findings from an experiment. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(1), 33–57.
Moynihan, D. P., and Beazley, I. (2016). Toward Next-Generation Performance Budgeting: Lessons from the Experiences of Seven Reforming Countries. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Moynihan, D.P. and Kroll, A.. (2016). Performance management routines that work: An early assessment of the GPRA Modernization Act. Public Administration Review, 76(2), 314–323.
Moynihan, D. P., and Landuyt, N. (2009). How do public organizations learn? Bridging structural and cultural divides. Public Administration Review, 69(6), 1097–1105.
Moynihan, D. P., and Pandey, S. K.. (2010). The big question for performance management: Why do managers use performance information? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 849–866.
Mullen, B., Atkins, J, Champion, D, et al. (1985). The false consensus effect: A meta-analysis of 115 hypothesis tests. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21(3), 262–283.
Muller, J. Z. (2018). The tyranny of metrics. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Mussweiler, T., and Epstude, K. (2009). Relatively fast! Efficiency advantages of comparative thinking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(1), 1–21.
Mussweiler, T., and Posten, A. C.. (2011). Relatively certain! Comparative thinking reduces uncertainty. Cognition, 122(2), 236–240.
Nannestad, P. (2008). What Have We Learned About Generalized Trust, If Anything? Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 413–436.
National Academy of Public Administration. 2018. Strengthening Organizational Health and Performance in Government. Washington DC: National Academy of Public Administration.
Nelson, T. E., Clawson, R. A., and Oxley, Z. M.. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91(3), 567–583.
Nicholson-Crotty, S., Nicholson-Crotty, J, and Fernandez, S. (2017). Performance and management in the public sector: Testing a model of relative risk aversion. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 603–614.
Nickerson, R. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220.
Nielsen, P. A. (2014a). Learning from performance feedback: Performance information, aspiration levels, and managerial priorities. Public Administration, 92(1), 142–160.
Nielsen, P. A. (2014b). Performance management, managerial authority and public service performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(2), 431–458.
Nielsen, P. A., and Baekgaard, M. (2015). Performance information, blame avoidance, and politicians’ attitudes to spending and reform: Evidence from an experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2), 545–569.
Nielsen, P. A., and Jacobsen, C. B.. (2018). Zone of acceptance under performance measurement: Does performance information affect employee acceptance of management authority? Public Administration Review, 78(5), 684–693
Nielsen, P. A., and Moynihan, D. P.. (2017). How do politicians attribute bureaucratic responsibility for performance? Negativity bias and interest group advocacy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(2), 269–283.
Nisbett, R. E., and Ross, L. (1980). Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Nisbett, R. E., and Wilson, T. D.. (1977). The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(4), 250–256.
Nyhan, B., and Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303–330.
Nyhan, B., and Reifler, J. (2019). The roles of information deficits and identity threat in the prevalence of misperceptions. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 29(2), 222–244.
Okan, Y., Garcia-Retamero, R, Cokely, E. T., and Maldonado, A. (2012). Individual differences in graph literacy: Overcoming denominator neglect in risk comprehension. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25(4), 390–401.
Olsen, A. L. (2013a). Leftmost-digit-bias in an enumerated public sector? An experiment on citizens' judgment of performance information. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(3), 365.
Olsen, A. L. (2013b). The politics of digits: Evidence of odd taxation. Public Choice, 154(1), 59–73.
Olsen, A. L. (2015a). “Simon said,” we didn’t jump. Public Administration Review, 75(2), 325–326.
Olsen, A. L. (2015b). Negative Performance Information Causes Asymmetrical Evaluations and Elicits Strong Responsibility Attributions. Paper presented at the 111th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, Sept. 3–6.
Olsen, A. L. (2015c). The numerical psychology of performance information: Implications for citizens, managers, and policymakers. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(1), 100–115.
Olsen, A. L. (2015d). Citizen (dis)satisfaction: An experimental equivalence framing study. Public Administration Review, 75(3), 469–478.
Olsen, A. L. (2017a). Human interest or hard numbers? Experiments on citizens’ selection, exposure, and recall of performance information. Public Administration Review, 77(3), 408–420.
Olsen, A. L. (2017b). Compared to what? How social and historical reference points affect citizens’ performance evaluations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(4), 562–580.
Olsen, A. L. and Henriksen, M. V. (2018). Taxes are Money: Tax Metric Salience and Citizens' Tax Preferences. Working Paper
Olsen, Asmus (2017c): Symbolic Numbers and Lottoery Tickets. Working Paper.
Ottaviani, M., and Sørensen, P. (2001). Information aggregation in debate: Who should speak first? Journal of Public Economics, 81(3), 393–421.
Pedersen, R. T. (2017). Ratio bias and policy preferences: How equivalency framing of numbers can affect attitudes. Political Psychology, 38(6), 1103–1120.
Pedersen, R. T., & Larsen, M. V. (2019). Putting a number on preferences: how numerical attitudes are shaped by ideology and equivalency framing. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 31(3), 528–548.
Petersen, N. B. G., Laumann, T, and Jakobsen, M. (2018). Acceptance or disapproval: Performance information in the eyes of public frontline employees. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(1), 101–117.
Petersen, M. B., Skov, M, Serritzlew, S and Ramzöy, T. Z.. (2013). Motivated reasoning and political parties: Evidence for increased processing in the face of party cues. Political Behavior, 35(4), 831–854.
Pettus, C., and Diener, E. (1977). Factors affecting the effectiveness of abstract versus concrete information. The Journal of Social Psychology, 103(2), 233–242.
Petty, R. E., and Cacioppo, J. T.. (1986). Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Piotrowski, S. J., and Van Ryzin, G. G.. (2007). Citizen attitudes toward transparency in local government. The American Review of Public Administration, 37(3), 306–323.
Pope, D., and Simonsohn, U. (2011). Round numbers as goals: Evidence from baseball, SAT takers, and the lab. Psychological science, 22(1), 71–79.
Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 243–281.
Priester, J. R., and Petty, R. E.. (1995). Source attributions and persuasion: Perceived honesty as a determinant of message scrutiny. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(6), 637–654.
Prior, M., Sood, G. and Khanna, K.. (2015). You Cannot Be Serious: The Impact of Accuracy Incentives on Partisan Bias in Reports of Economic Perceptions. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 10(4), 489–518.
Ravitch, D. (2016). The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice Are Undermining Education. New York: Basic Books.
Redlawsk, D. P., Civettini, A. J. W., and Emmerson, K. M.. (2010). The affective tipping point: Do motivated reasoners ever ‘get it?’. Political Psychology, 31(4), 563–593.
Ridley, C. E. (with H. A. Simon). (1939). Specifications for the annual municipal report; suggestions for the content, preparation, design, publication and distribution of the annual municipal report. Chicago: International City Managers Association.
Roberts, P. S. and Wernstedt, K.. (2019). Decision Biases and Heuristics Among Emergency Managers: Just Like the Public They Manage For? The American Review of Public Administration, 49(3), 292–308.
Roher, M. (1941). Education of a citizen. National Civic Review, 30(4), 192–198.
Rozin, P., and Royzman, E. B.. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296–320.
Ryan, R. M., and Deci, E. L.. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68.
Salge, T. O. (2011). A behavioral model of innovative search: Evidence from public hospital services. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(1), 181–210.
Schilling, J., and Kluge, A. (2009). Barriers to organizational learning: An integration of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(3), 337–360.
Schindler, R. M., and Kirby, P. N.. (1997). Patterns of rightmost digits used in advertised prices: Implications for nine-ending effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 192–201.
Schindler, R. M., and Wiman, A. R.. (1989). Effects of odd pricing on price recall. Journal of Business Research, 19(3), 165–177.
Shafir, E. (2002). Rationality. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 491–517.
Sheffer, , Lior, P. Loewen, Soroka, S., Walgrave, S. and Sheafer, T.. (2018). Nonrepresentative Representatives: An Experimental Study of the Decision Making of Elected Politicians. The American Political Science Review, 112(2), 302–321.
Simon, H. A. (1937). Comparative statistics and the measurement of efficiency. National Municipal Review, 26(11), 524–527.
Simon, H. A. (1939). The administrator in search of statistics. Public Management, 21, 106–109.
Slattery, K. L., and Hakanen, E. A.. (1994). Trend: Sensationalism versus public affairs content of local TV news: Pennsylvania revisited. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 38(2), 205–216.
Slothuus, R., and de Vreese, C. H.. (2010). Political parties, motivated reasoning, and issue framing effects. Journal of Politics, 72(3), 630–645.
Slovic, P. (2010). If I look at the mass I will never act: Psychic numbing and genocide. In Roeser, S, Emotions and Risky Technologies, vol. 5, The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 37–59.
Smith, P. (1995). On the unintended consequences of publishing performance data in the public 493 sector. International Journal of Public Administration, 18 (2/3), 277–310.
Sniezek, J. A. (1992). Groups under uncertainty: An examination of confidence in group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52(1), 124–155.
Stiving, M., and Winer, R. S.. (1997). An empirical analysis of price endings with scanner data. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(1), 57–67.
Stone, D. (1997). Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York: W. W. Norton.
Sunstein, C., and Hastie, R. (2015). Wiser: Getting Beyond Groupthink to Make Groups Smarter. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
Taber, C. S., and Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769.
Thaler, R. H. (with L. J. Ganser). (2015). Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioral Economics. New York: W. W. Norton.
Tsai, C. I., Klayman, J, and Hastie, R. (2008). Effects of amount of information on judgment accuracy and confidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107(2), 97–105.
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323.
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.
Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Upson, L. D. (1915). The value of municipal exhibits. National Civic Review, 4(1), 65–69.
van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A. and Maibach, E.. (2018). Scientific agreement can neutralize politicization of facts. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(1), 2–3.
Van de Walle, S. (2004). Context-specific images of the archetypical bureaucrat: Persistence and diffusion of the bureaucracy stereotype. Public Voices, 7(1), 3.
Van de Walle, S. and Van Dooren, W (2008). Introduction: Using public sector performance information. In Van Dooren, W and Van de Walle, S, Performance Information in the Public Sector: How It Is Used. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–10.
Van Ryzin, G. G. (2004). Expectations, performance, and citizen satisfaction with urban services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(3), 433–448.
Van Ryzin, G. G. (2013). An experimental test of the expectancy-disconfirmation theory of citizen satisfaction. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(3), 597–614.
Van Slyke, D. and Roch, C.. (2004). What Do They Know, and Whom Do They Hold Accountable? Citizens in the Government Nonprofit Contracting Relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(2), 191–209.
Vavreck, L. (2017). A Measure of Identity: Are You Wedded to your Party. New York Times. January 30, A3.
Webeck, S., & Nicholson-Crotty, S. (2019). How Historical and Social Comparisons Influence Interpretations of Performance Information. International Public Management Journal, 1–24.
Woolpert, E. D. (1940). Government: Municipal public relations. Public Opinion Quarterly, 4(1), 164–167.
YouGov (2018) How good is good? https://yougov.co.uk/topics/lifestyle/articles-reports/2018/10/02/how-good-good. Last Accessed March 26th 2020.
Zillmann, D. (2006). Exemplification effects in the promotion of safety and health. Journal of Communication, 56(S1), S221–S237.
