Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
The Cambridge History of Classical Literature
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 10
  • Cited by
    This book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Anderson, Daniel 2018. SPECIES OF AMBIGUITY IN SEMONIDES FR. 7. The Cambridge Classical Journal, Vol. 64, Issue. , p. 1.

    Lucas, Duncan A. 2018. Affect Theory, Genre, and the Example of Tragedy. p. 101.

    Lucas, Duncan A. 2018. Affect Theory, Genre, and the Example of Tragedy. p. 151.

    Lucas, Duncan A. 2018. Affect Theory, Genre, and the Example of Tragedy. p. 191.

    Mikel, Labiano 2017. Greek interjectional ἆ = “Stop doing that!” in Euripides. Glotta, Vol. 93, Issue. 1, p. 36.

    Konstan, David 2015. Laughter, Humor, and the (Un)Making of Gender. p. 13.

    Willison, Ian 2014. On the History of the Archival Library and Scholarship in the West since the Alexandrian Library: An Overview. Alexandria: The Journal of National and International Library and Information Issues, Vol. 25, Issue. 3, p. 87.

    Solbakk, Jan Helge 2006. ‘Catharsis and moral therapy II: An Aristotelian account’. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, Vol. 9, Issue. 2, p. 141.

    Voultsiadou, Eleni and Tatolas, Apostolos 2005. The fauna of Greece and adjacent areas in the Age of Homer: evidence from the first written documents of Greek literature. Journal of Biogeography, Vol. 32, Issue. 11, p. 1875.

    Joost-Gaugier, Christiane L. 1998. Ptolemy and Strabo and Their Conversation with Appelles and Protogenes: Cosmography and Painting in Raphael's School of Athens. Renaissance Quarterly, Vol. 51, Issue. 3, p. 761.

    ×

Book description

This series provides individual textbooks on early Greek poetry, on Greek drama, on philosophy, history and oratory, and on the literature of the Hellenistic period and of the Empire. A chapter on books and readers in the Greek world concludes Part 4. Each part has its own appendix of authors and works, a list of works cited, and an index.

Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×
  • 1 - Books and readers in the Greek world
    pp 1-41
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521210423.002
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The interrelated questions of the circulation of books, education, scholarship and taste cannot be considered without taking into account the remarkable spread of Greek culture prompted by the conquests of Alexander the Great. The implications of this movement were easily as important for the history of Greek literature as the impact of the Homeric poems themselves. Alexander's policy, continued by his Successors, of planting cities all over the East led to the establishment of Greek, in the modified form of Attic known as the koine, as the language of government and culture far beyond its old boundaries. As a result many non-Greeks came to contribute directly to the development of Greek literature. Alexander's most significant foundation was Alexandria in Egypt, which the Ptolemies established as an intellectual centre to rival and indeed surpass Athens. Another important long-term effect of Hellenization was the continuity of ancient and Byzantine education.
  • 2 - Homer
    pp 42-91
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521210423.003
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Homer was from the beginning the most admired poet of Hellenic and Hellenized antiquity, and remained so until near its end. He seemed to embody the spirit of an age of heroes, yet never looked old-fashioned like Aeschylus or morally dubious like Euripides. The orality of Homer is of prime importance not only as a factor in the transmission and survival of his work but also in determining its true quality. For it is imperative to understand about the Iliad and Odyssey that they were composed wholly or substantially without the help of writing, by a poet or poets who were effectively illiterate, and for audiences that could not read. The Odyssey belongs to the same epic tradition as the Iliad and shares with it much in the way of formular language and thematic material.
  • 3 - Hesiod
    pp 92-105
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521210423.004
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Hesiod is the first European poet who introduces himself into his work as an individual with a distinctive role to play. Three poems, namely the Shield of Heracles, the Works and days, and the Theogony, survive in Hesiod's name, together with a host of fragments of other works attributed to him in antiquity. All are composed in dactylic hexameters and in the conventional language of epic. Hesiod begins his account of creation and of the succession of divinities who have presided over it since the beginning. Partly a narrative of development, partly an account of the theological status quo, it is constructed loosely, with passages in which some three hundred gods are classified according to genealogy, interspersed with a number of more leisurely stories. Herodotus regarded Homer and Hesiod as the founders of Greek theology, and the Theogony is the only coherent account of it to have survived from this early period.
  • 4 - The epic tradition after Homer and Hesiod
    pp 106-116
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521210423.005
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Homer and Hesiod, as the sole survivors of the earliest age of Greek literature, have conveyed such an impression of uniqueness that it requires some effort to recall that they were by no means without rivals and imitators. Among the minor works often ascribed to Homer in antiquity were certain hymns, hexameter poems addressed to various deities. In later antiquity all the hexameter hymns not associated with other famous hymnodists were gathered with those specifically attributed to Homer to form the corpus of 'Homeric Hymns' that has survived from the end of the medieval period. The corpus includes four long hymns, to Demeter, Apollo, Hermes and Aphrodite, of between 293 and 580 hexameter verses, and twenty-nine short ones, varying from three verses to fifty-nine in the case of Hymn 7, to Dionysus, which is probably truncated as it stands and looks relatively early on stylistic grounds.
  • 5 - Elegy and iambus
    pp 117-164
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521210423.006
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Most poets of the archaic period, no matter what their provenance or the genre in which they worked, were strongly influenced by the Ionian epic tradition and particularly by its main representative, Homer. The dependence is most clearly marked in the poems of Hesiod the Boeotian, and in the closely related elegiac couplets of poets whose origins are as diverse as Ionia, (Mimnermus and Callinus), the Aegean islands (Semonides of Amorgos and Archilochus of Paros) and the Greek mainland (Tyrtaeus of Sparta, Theognis of Megara and Solon of Athens). Semonides of Amorgos is one of our earliest representatives of a perennial literary mode, which manifests itself now in lampoon or parody, now in comedy, now in satire. There is a remarkable, and rather suspect, parallel between the biographies and poetic activity of the two most famous writers of iambics, Hipponax and Archilochus.
  • 6 - Archaic choral lyric
    pp 165-201
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521210423.007
  • View abstract
    Summary
    From Alcman in the seventh century to Timotheus at the beginning of the fourth, choral lyric remains an important literary form. Like much of early Greek poetry, choral lyric is public rather than personal in outlook, expression and orientation. Choral lyric also played an important part at the great cosmopolitan celebrations. The poets of early choral lyric are shadowy figures. They are more closely associated with the history of music than with literature. Only with Alcman does early choral lyric have a literary reality. He is the first choral poet of whom anything substantial is preserved. Stesichorus of Himera, regarded in antiquity as the successor to Alcman in lyric, is best known for his retelling of epic themes in lyric metres. The sands of Egypt and the patient skill of papyrologists have spectacularly enhanced our knowledge of Stesichorus' poetry.
  • 7 - Monody
    pp 202-221
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521210423.008
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Monody or solo song was the product of sixth-century poets living in the Aegean islands. The most remarkable were Sappho and Alcaeus of Lesbos and Anacreon and Ibycus at the court of Polycrates in Samos. The poetry of Sappho and Alcaeus is the oldest monody to survive, but it had its antecedents in the earlier music and poetry of Lesbos and in the compositions of Archilochus. Dionysius of Halicarnassus, commenting on the style of Alcaeus, says that often if one removed the metre one would find political rhetoric, and Horace, looking for a single epithet for Alcaeus' songs. Some of the drinking-songs of the monodists were current in fifth-century Athens under the title 'skolia'. Athenaeus preserves a collection of twenty-five 'Attic skolia', most of which must have been composed in Athens in the late sixth or early fifth century. The majority are in four-line stanzas in aeolic rhythm, and they were presumably sung to one or two standard tunes.
  • 8 - Choral lyric in the fifth century
    pp 222-244
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521210423.009
  • View abstract
    Summary
    More than almost any other literary form, choral lyric is bound up with the values of city and clan in a world where things changed slowly. By 450 the tyrants and aristocratic families which had commissioned the odes of Pindar and Bacchylides were gone or endangered, their values threatened by the fast-rising power of Athenian democracy. By the last quarter of the century the festivals which provided the occasion for choral song were losing their religious basis. Simonides of Ceos is a good example of how the humanistic spirit of late sixth- and early fifth-century choral lyric operates within its religious frame. This chapter explains fragments of four Boeotian or Peloponnesian poetesses: Corinna of Tanagra, Myrtis of Anthedon, Telesilla of Argos, Praxilla of Sicyon. Of these the most important and the most puzzling is Corinna, whose work is represented by significant portions of three poems surviving in papyrus fragments.
  • 9 - Early Greek philosophy
    pp 245-257
    • By A. A. Long, University of California, Berkeley
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521210423.010
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Three early Greek philosophers were poets, Xenophanes, Parmenides and Empedocles. Heraclitus, who lived at about the same time, was a philosopher whose prose is stylistically unique in Greek literature. He was familiar with the work of Xenophanes whom he names after Hesiod and Pythagoras as someone whom 'much learning has not taught intelligence'. The Ionian prose of Anaxagoras is more representative of early Greek philosophical writing than are the aphorisms of Heraclitus. Though much of his adult life was spent in Athens, Anaxagoras belongs to the Ionian tradition of philosophy initiated by Anaximander of Miletus. Democritus, in spite of the loss of his writings, must certainly be regarded as the most versatile and constructive philosopher of the later fifth century BC Democritus admired Homer and claimed that divine inspiration is the source of the 'finest' poetry.
  • 10 - Tragedy
    pp 258-345
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521210423.011
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The documented history of Greek tragedy begins in 472 BC with Aeschylus' Persae. The surviving plays of Aeschylus tell us what needs to be explained. For the earlier plays two actors are required. The first thing one has to take account of in trying to assess the impact of Greek tragedy as it was experienced in performance is the context of that experience, the place of tragic drama in the life of the Athenian community. For Aristotle, whose work lies behind most of the ancient critical tradition, Sophocles plainly exemplified what was most to be admired in tragedy. It is no doubt the overwhelming influence of the Poetics as much as Sophocles' midway historical position that has led critics to treat him almost as the norm of Greek tragedy, by comparison with whom Aeschylus has often been judged primitive and Euripides decadent.
  • 11 - The satyr play
    pp 346-354
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521210423.012
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The humour of satyr plays consists of poking fun at tragedy, in order of course to provide comic relief. Many satyr plays deal with subtle plots for overcoming ogres, monsters, and other villains, and wily schemes for theft and deception, and there is every reason to think that these were presented as tolerable, or even admirable. It is possible that the writing of satyr plays parodying accompanying tragedies persisted after the time of Aeschylus. The theme of hospitality and its abuse also figured in satyr plays with other types of subject. A notable feature of the satyr play is marked dependence on a limited repertoire of stereotyped themes, situations, narrative elements, and characterizations. Two common characteristics of satyr plays may be noticed. The first is that many satyr plays are set either in the countryside or in exotically alien locales: Asia Minor, Egypt and Libya. Second, almost by definition a satyr play must have a happy ending.
  • 12 - Comedy
    pp 355-425
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521210423.013
  • View abstract
    Summary
    From lyric writing to dialogue at a casual and unaffected level of everyday speech, the fifth-century comic poet has a whole vocabulary of different modes of expression at his command, and within them, like a modern comic entertainer, he can be both mimic and creator. This chapter shows how the early comic tradition of adventure with mythical background is very heavily overlaid by the type of myth-burlesque which derives primarily from tragedy, especially the later and more adventurous kind of Euripidean tragedy. Myth is a very primitive element in comedy. Mythical scenes and characters, often based on a treatment in some more elevated form of literature, continued from Epicharmus onwards to lend themselves to many different comic purposes, including those of political comedy. Myth, especially myth as found in tragedy, could provide patterns of character and action which transmuted themselves into part of the comic poet's own stock-in- trade.
  • 13 - Historiography
    pp 426-471
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521210423.014
  • View abstract
    Summary
    With Herodotus and Thucydides, the fifth century saw the creation of historiography as a separate form of intellectual and artistic activity which could hold its own against poetry on the one hand and philosophy on the other. To be sure, a sense of history had existed in Greece since the time of Homer, and poetry, philosophy and science contributed decisively to the formation of the new genre. One feature of history is its monumentality: history was to deal with great subjects and each subject would have its own historian. The close association of history and literature produced a distinctive manner of presentation which creates difficulties for anyone who tries to use the ancient historical works as source materials. The emphasis on Thucydides would seem a productive way to approach the historians of the fourth century and the Hellenistic period. Xenophon and Polybius, the two historians from these periods whose work is most fully preserved, are each in some sense 'Thucydidean'.
  • 14 - Sophists and physicians of the Greek enlightenment
    pp 472-477
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521210423.015
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The century following the Persian Wars has often been referred to as the age of the Greek enlightenment, for some of its leading thinkers demonstrate a rationalism in viewing man and his world and an enthusiasm for intellectual experiment suggestive of the eighteenth century. The sophists exploited and taught certain ideas and catchwords, many of which they derived from earlier poets and philosophers. A second important group of thinkers in the Greek enlightenment were the physicians, who shared certain characteristics with the sophists. A number of the treatises illustrate the Greek proclivity for philosophical hypothesis in preference to empirical observation, and some of them can be associated with the views of specific philosophers: On nutriment, for example, with Heraclitus. The Hippocratic writings are, however, an important product of the Greek mind; they illustrate its powers of generalizing and reasoning, and they had great influence on Plato and Aristotle as well as in the history of medicine.
  • 15 - Plato and the Socratic work of Xenophon
    pp 478-497
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521210423.016
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The striking and unusual personality of Socrates attracted much attention among the Athenians of the later fifth century, and brought him many admirers. Xenophon's Socratic writing is of interest because it provides much evidence about views and assumptions common in his time. He attempted to be critical of them, but he was a superficial thinker, whose criticisms did not cut deep. To treat of Plato as a writer without mentioning his philosophy would be as helpful as to describe a lion by an account of its skin. The main evidence for Plato's early formative years is given by the seventh of a collection of thirteen Letters ascribed to him. Gorgias, probably written about the time of Plato's original visit to Syracuse, is the first dialogue that is predominantly positive; it is contrived to contrast rhetoric and philosophy, the pursuit of political power and that of knowledge, wrong-doing and morality.
  • 16 - Oratory
    pp 498-526
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521210423.017
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Discourse appears in Greek literature from the very beginning as a characteristic feature of Greek life. In order to understand literary oratory it is necessary first to review the developing role of public speaking in fifth-century political and intellectual life. Fifth-century deliberative oratory is less well known than either epideictic or judicial. As a literary genre oratory is chiefly a phenomenon of the fourth and of Athens. Although the Athenians themselves realized this, the concept of 'Attic' oratory was more extensively developed by rhetoricians, grammarians and lexicographers of the first century BC and later in an attempt to rescue Hellenistic Greek prose from the pretensions associated with the orators of Asia Minor and from die banality of the marketplace. Two of the Attic orators have already been discussed: Antiphon and Andocides. The others worked chiefly or entirely in the fourth century: Lysias, Isaeus and Isocrates; Demosthenes and Aeschines; Hyperides, Lycurgus and Dinarchus.
  • 17 - Aristotle
    pp 527-540
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521210423.018
  • View abstract
    Summary
    For the history of Greek literature, philosophy, from Aristotle onwards, is important in at least three different ways: style and genre, literary theory, and thought. Aristotle established methods of analysis and positive theories about the nature of things which are often not only an advance on Plato but deserve to be called original in the highest degree. Aristotle's philosophy and the nature of his writings must be discussed together. From later antiquity up to recent times Aristotle was regarded as a systematic philosopher par excellence. Like all educated Greeks Aristotle must have known vast quantities of Homer and other poets by heart, and his interest in literature was by no means purely one of pleasure. He compiled, or organized the compilation of, records of the victors and their plays at the Athenian dramatic festivals, and his surviving works include two studies which are of especial literary interest, Rhetoric and Poetics.
  • 18 - Hellenistic poetry
    pp 541-621
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521210423.019
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Poetry had experienced a radical shift of direction by the Hellenistic period. Hellenistic poetry could find constant intrinsic interest in topics and attitudes drawn from 'low' life, rural and urban, matters vulgar and even grotesque. The most important intellectual figure in the early years of the new Hellenistic world was Philetas from the east Greek island of Cos. Philetas was the first major writer who was both poet and scholar, and secured an instant reputation in both fields. Philetas and Callimachus were the only two Hellenistic authors to be classed in the elegiac canon, and even from the little that is still extant of his poetry Philetas' direct influence on Callimachus and Apollonius Rhodius can be clearly discerned. Among his contemporaries and succeeding generations of writers Philetas reputation was outstanding: his fellow-citizens on Cos erected a statue of him in characteristic pose and Theocritus and Callimachus refer to him explicitly as an acknowledged classic.
  • 19 - Post-Aristotelian philosophy
    pp 622-641
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521210423.020
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The scepticism of the Academy and the decline of the Peripatos were counterbalanced by the development of the two new philosophical schools at Athens, the Garden of Epicurus and the Stoa. The situation of Greece at the end of the fourth century can help to explain certain features of Stoicism and Epicureanism. The history of Greek philosophy has more to teach us about Stoicism and Epicureanism than one can learn from speculating about the troubles of the Hellenistic world. Lucretius, the greatest Epicurean writer, is conspicuously well read in Greek literature, and Philodemus, besides writing on rhetoric and poetry, was a graceful epigrammatist. Like Stoicism and Epicureanism, Scepticism was a development of the Hellenistic world. The Platonic Academy adopted Scepticism from the time of Arcesilaus in the third century BC and it continued in this way for the next two hundred years. Pyrrho's Scepticism was a means to the attainment of tranquillity than a theoretical criticism of positivist philosophy.
  • 20 - The literature of the Empire
    pp 642-713
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521210423.021
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The bulk of the surviving Greek literature of the Imperial age is in prose and implies limited interest in traditional verse forms. The legacy of Callimachus and the epigrammatists who succeeded him determined the fate of Greek poetry under the Roman Empire. Among the Greek poems of the Roman Imperial age are two large works, related in character and ascribed to the same author. One, a work in five books, concerns the art of fishing and displays much learning about fish; the other, in four books and clearly composed under the influence of the poem on fishing, concerns hunting as well as the animals that are hunted. Of the Greek historians of the third century AD only two are represented today by anything more than fragments. These are Cassius Dio and Herodian. Herodian, for all his carelessness, was deeply imbued with the traditions of Greek historical writing.
  • 21 - Epilogue
    pp 714-718
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521210423.022
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This epilogue provides an overview of concepts discussed in the preceding chapters of this book. The middle years of the third century were a critical period in which many must have doubted that Graeco-Roman civilization could long survive. By the second half of the second century, the Christian apologists had made significant advances in their attempt to prove the superiority of Christian doctrine not only to pagan mythology but also to Greek philosophy. They also clothed their presentation of the Christian message in a literary style most calculated to appeal to educated pagan Greeks. Clement of Alexandria and his successor Origenes were active propagandists and teachers of the Christian faith in the late second and early third century. The force and vitality of their writing is a sharp contrast to the tired artifice of style and the emptiness of content which are all too common in the work of their pagan contemporaries.
Works Cited in the Text
Adams, C. D. (1917). ‘Demosthenes' avoidance of breves’, C.Ph. 12: 271–94.
Adkins, A. W. H. (1960). Merit and responsibility. Oxford.
Adrados, F. R. (1978). ‘Propuestas para una nueva edición et interpretación de Estesí-coro’, Emerita 46: 251–99.
Albini, U. (1968). [Erode Attico] пΕРI пOΛIТΕIAΣ. Florence = Biblioteca nazionale, Serie dei classici greci e latini. Testi con commento filologico viii.
Allen, T. W. (1912). Homeri opera v. Scriptorum Classicorum Bibliotheca Oxoniensis (Oxford).
Allen, T. W., Halliday, W. R. and Sikes, E. E. (1936). The Homeric Hymns. Oxford.
Altheim, F. (1948/1950). Literatur und Gesellschaft im ausgehenden Altertum. Halle/Saale.
Anderson, G. (1976). Studies in Lucian's comic fiction. Mnemosyne suppl. xliii. Leiden.
Andrewes, A. (1956). The Greek tyrants. London.
Andrewes, A. (1959). ‘Thucydides on the causes of war’, C.Q. n.s. 9: 223–39.
Arnim, H. von (1913). Supplementum Euripideum. Bonn.
Arnott, W. G. (1975). Menander, Plautus, Terence. G. & R., New surveys in the classics IX.
Arnott, W. G. (1979). Menander I. Loeb Classical Library (London & Cambridge, Mass.).
Arrighetti, G. (1973). Epicuro opere. 2nd ed. Turin.
Austin, M. M. (1970). Greece and Egypt in the archaic age. P.C.Ph.S. suppl. II.
Austin, R. G. (1948). Quintiliani Institutionis Oratoriae Liber XII. Oxford.
Babut, D. (1969). Plutarque et le stoïcisme. Paris.
Bacon, H. (1961). Barbarians in Greek tragedy. New Haven.
Badian, E. (1958). ‘The eunuch Bagoas’, C.Q. n.s. 8: 144–57.
Bailey, C. (1926). Epicurus. The extant remains. Oxford.
Baldry, H. C. (1953). ‘The idler's paradise in Greek comedy’, G. & R. 22: 49–60.
Barber, G. L. (1935). The historian Ephorus. Cambridge.
Barigazzi, A. (1966). Favorino di Arelate. Florence.
Barlow, S. A. (1971). The imagery of Euripides: a study in the dramatic use of pictorial language. London.
Barns, J. W. B. (1956). ‘Egypt and the Greek romance’, Akten des VIII Kongress für Papyrologie, 29–36. Vienna.
Barrett, W. S. (1964). Euripides, Hippolytos. Oxford.
Barwick, K. (1957). Probleme der stoischen Sprachlehre und Rhetorik. Abhand. zu Leipzig, Phil.-hist. Kl. xlix 3. Berlin.
Bateman, J. J. (1962). ‘Some aspects of Lysias' argumentation’, Phoenix 16: 155–77.
Beck, F. A. G. (1975). Album of Greek education. Sydney.
Bernays, J. (1853). Grundzüge der verlorenen Abhandlung des Aristoteles über Wirkung der Tragödie. Breslau.
Berthiaume, G. (1982). ‘Les rôles du mágeiros: étude sur la boucherie, la cuisine et le sacrifice dans la Grèce ancienne’, Mnemosyne suppl. lxx.
Bhattacharya, V. (1943). The Āgamaśāstra of Gauḍapāda. Calcutta.
Bieber, M. (1961). The history of the Greek and Roman theater. 2nd ed. Princeton, N.J..
Björck, G. (1950). Das alpha impurum und die tragische Kunstsprache. Uppsala.
Blanchard, A. (1970). ‘Recherches sur la composition des comédies de Ménandre’, R.E.G. 83: 38–51.
Blass, F. (1887). Die attische Beredsamkeit. Leipzig.
Bloch, H. (1940). ‘Historical literature of the fourth century’, H.S.C.Ph. suppl. 1, 302–76.
Blum, R. (1977). Kallimachos und die Literaturverzeichnung bei den Griechen. Frankfurt am Main.
Boegehold, A. L. (1963). ‘Toward a study of Greek voting procedure’, Hesperia 32: 366–74.
Boiling, G. M. (1956). ‘Notes on Corinna’, A.J.Ph. 77: 282–7.
Bollack, J., JudetCombe, P. and Wismann, H. (1977). La réplique de Jocaste, Cahiers de Philologie, 11, avec un supplément, Publications de l'Université de Lille iii. Lille.
Bonanno, M. G. (1972). Studi su Cratete comico. Padua.
Bonner, R. J. and Smith, G. (1930). The administration of justice from Homer to Aristotle. Chicago.
Bonner, W. S. (1939). The literary treatises of Dionysius of Halicarnassus. Cambridge.
Bosworth, A. B. (1970). ‘Aristotle and Callisthenes’, Historia 19: 407–13.
Bosworth, A. B. (1972). ‘Arrian's literary development’, C.Q. n.s. 22: 163–85.
Bowersock, G. W. (1969). Greek sophists in the Roman empire. Oxford.
Bowersock, G. W. (1971). Review of Fontana, M. J., L'Athenaion Politeia, Gnomon 43: 416–18.
Bowersock, G. W. (1973). ‘Greek intellectuals and the Imperial Cult in the second century A.D.’, Le culte des souverains dans l'empire romain, Entretiens Hardt 19: 179–212. Geneva.
Bowie, E. L. (1974). ‘Greeks and their past in the Second Sophistic’, in Finley, M. I., ed., Studies in ancient society, 166–209. London (= Past and Present 46 (1970) 3–41).
Bowie, E. L. (1978). ‘Apollonius of Tyana: tradition and reality’, ANRW ii.xvi.2 1652–99.
Bowra, C. M. (1964). Pindar. Oxford.
Brillante, C., Cantilena, M. and Pavese, C. O. (1981). (edd.). I poemi epici rapsodici non omerici e la tradizione orale. Padua.
Bringmann, K. (1965). Studien zu den politischen Ideen des Isokrates. Hypomnemata xiv. Göttingen.
Brink, C. O. (1963). Horace on poetry. Prolegomena to the literary epistles. Cambridge.
Brown, A. L. (1978). ‘Alkman, P. Oxy. 2443 Fr. 1 and 3213’, Z.P.E. 32: 36–8.
Browning, R. (1960). ‘Recentiores non deteriores’, B.I.C.S. 7: 11–21.
Browning, R. (1969). Medieval and modem Greek. London. (2nd ed. Cambridge 1983).
Bruns, I. (1896). Das literarische Porträt der Griechen im fünften und vierten Jahrhundert vor Christi Geburt. Berlin.
Brunt, P. A. (1973). ‘Aspects of the social thought of Dio Chrysostom and of the Stoics’, P.C.Ph.S. n.s. 19: 9–34.
Brunt, P. A. (1974). ‘Marcus Aurelius in his Meditations’, J.R.S. 64: 1–20.
Bundy, E. L. (1962). Studia pindarica. Univ. of Calif. Studies in Classical Philology xviii. 1 and 2. Berkeley & Los Angeles.
Bürger, K. (1892). ‘Zu Xenophon von Ephesus’, Hermes 27: 36–67.
Burkert, W. (1961). ‘Hellenistische Pseudopythagorica’, Philologus 105: 16–43; 226–46.
Burkert, W. (1977). ‘Le mythe de Géryon: perspectives préhistoriques et tradition rituelle’, in Gentili, B. and Paioni, G. (ed.), Il Mito Greco, Atti del Convegno Internazionale (Urbino 7–12 maggio 1973) 273–83. Rome.
Burnett, A. P. (1964). ‘The race with the Pleiades’, C.Ph. 59: 30–4.
Burnyeat, M. F. (1977). ‘Socratic midwifery, Platonic inspiration’, B.I.C.S. 24: 7–16.
Butcher, S. H. (1891). Some aspects of the Greek genius. London.
Cairns, F. (1972). Generic composition in Greek and Roman poetry. Edinburgh.
Calame, C. (1977). Les choeurs de jeunes filles en Grèce archaïque, ii, Alcman. Rome.
Campbell, D. A. (1967). Greek lyric poetry. London & New York.
Cassio, A. C. (1977). Aristofane, Banchettanti: i frammenti. Pisa.
Chadwick, J. (1973). ‘The Berezan lead letter’, P.C.Ph.S. n.s. 19: 35–7.
Chadwick, J. (1976). The Mycenaean world. Cambridge.
Chalk, H. H. O. (1960). ‘Eros and the Lesbian pastorals of Longus’, J.H.S. 80: 32–51.
Charitonidis, S., Kahil, L. and Ginouvès, R. (1970). Les mosaïques de la maison du Ménandre à Mytilène. Antike Kunst, Beiheft 6. Bern.
Cherniss, H. (1935). Aristotle's criticism of presocratic philosophy. Baltimore.
Cochrane, C. N. (1929). Thucydides and the science of history. London.
Coffey, M. (1976). Roman satire. London.
Cole, T. (1967). Democritus and the sources of Greek anthropology. Cleveland, Ohio.
Coleman, R. G. G. (1972). ‘The role of the Chorus in Sophocles' Antigone’, P.C.Ph.S. n.s. 18: 4–27.
Conacher, D. J. (1967). Euripidean drama. Toronto.
Connor, W. R. (1967). ‘History without heroes: Theopompus' treatment of Philip’, G.R.B.S. 8: 133–54.
Connor, W. R. (1971). The new politicians of fifth-century Athens. Princeton, N.J..
Constantinides, E. (1969). ‘Timocles Ikarioi satyroi: a reconsideration’, T.A.Ph.A. 100: 49–61.
Cook, R. M. (1937). ‘The date of the Hesiodic Shield’, C.Q. 31: 204–14.
Cooper, L. (1922). An Aristotelian theory of comedy. New York.
Cornford, F. M. (1907). Thucydides mythistoricus. London.
Cousin, J. (1935). Études sur Quintilien I. Paris.
Cunningham, I. C. (1971). Herodas. Oxford.
D̄örrie, H. (1938). ‘Die griechischen Romane und das Ćhristentum’, Philologus 93: 273–6.
Dain, A. (1963). ‘La survie de Ménandre’, Maia 15: 278–309.
Dale, A. M. (1954). Euripides, Alcestis. Oxford.
Dale, A. M. (1959). ‘The Hoopoe's song’, C.R. 9: 199–200 = Collected papers (1969) 135–6.
Davies, M. I. (1969). ‘Thoughts on the Oresteia before Aischylos’, B.C.H. 93: 214–60.
Davison, J. A. (1968). From Archilochus to Pindar. London. (= Phoenix 16 (1962) 219–22).
Dawe, R. D. (1972). ‘Stesichorus, frag. 207 P’, P.C.Ph.S. n.s. 18: 28–30.
Dawkins, R. M. (1929). (ed.). ‘The Sanctuary of Artemis Orthia at Sparta’, J.H.S. suppl. v. London.
Dawson, C. M. (1966). ‘Spoudaiogeloion: random thoughts on occasional poems’, Y.Cl.S. 19: 39–76.
De Lacy, P. H. (1939). ‘The Epicurean analysis of language’, A.J.Ph. 60: 85–92.
de Romilly, J. (1956a). Histoire et raison chez Thucydide. Paris.
de Romilly, J. (1956b). ‘L'utilité de l'histoire selon Thucydide’, in Entretiens Hardt 4. Geneva.
de Romilly, J. (1962). ‘Le pseudo-Xenophon et Thucydide’, Revue de Philologie 36: 225–41.
de Romilly, J. (1963). Thucydides and Athenian imperialism, tr. Thody, P.. Oxford.
de Ste Croix, G. E. M. (1972). The origins of the Peloponnesian War. London.
Deichgräber, K. (1933). ‘Hymnische Elemente in der philosophischen Prosa der Vorsokratiker’, Philologus 88: 347–61.
Delatte, A. (1922). Essai sur la politique pythagoricienne. Liège.
Delorme, J. (1960). Gymnasion. Paris.
Denniston, J. D. (1960). Greek prose style. Oxford.
Denniston, J. D. and Page, D. L. (1957). Agamemnon. Oxford.
Dessau, H. (1892). Inscriptions Latinae Selectae I. Berlin.
Detienne, M. (1967). Les maîtres de vérité dans la Grèce archaïque. Paris.
Devereux, G. (1976). Dreams in Greek tragedy. Oxford.
Dickie, Matthew (1978). ‘The argument and form of Simonides 542 PMG’, H.S.C.Ph. 82: 21–33.
Diller, H. (1959). ‘Stand und Aufgaben der Hippocrates-Forschung’, Jahrb. der Acad. der Wiss. und der Lit. Mainz 271–87.
Dittenberger, W. (1915–24). Sylloge Inscriptionum Graecarum. 3rd ed. Leipzig.
Dodds, E. R. (1929). ‘Euripides the irrationalist’, C.R. 43: 97–104.
Dodds, E. R. (1951). The Greeks and the irrational. Berkeley & Los Angeles.
Dodds, E. R. (1960). Euripides, Bacchae. 2nd ed. Oxford.
Dohm, H. (1964). Mageiros. Zetemata xxxii. Munich.
Dover, K. J. (1950). ‘The chronology of Antiphon's speeches’, C.Q. 44: 44–60.
Dover, K. J. (1954). ‘Greek comedy’, in (ed.) Platnauer, M., Fifty years (and twelve) of classical scholarship (Oxford, 1968).
Dover, K. J. (1964). ‘The poetry of Archilochos’, in Entretiens Hardt 10: 181–212. Geneva.
Dover, K. J. (1968a). Aristophanes' Clouds. Oxford.
Dover, K. J. (1968b). Lysias and the corpus Lysiacum. Berkeley.
Dover, K. J. (1972). Aristophanic comedy. London.
Dover, K. J. (1976). ‘The freedom of the intellectual in Greek society’, TAΛNTA 7: 24–54.
Drews, R. (1973). The Greek accounts of eastern history. Washington, D.C..
Düring, I. (1957) Aristotle in the ancient biographical tradition. Stud. Graeca et Latina Gothoburgensia v. Göteborg.
Düring, I. (1966). Aristoteles. Darstellung und Interpretatíon seines Denkens. Heidelberg.
Dziatzko, K. (1899). ‘Buchhandel’, Pauly-G., A. Wissowa-W., Kroll, Real–Encyclopädie derklassischen Alttertumswissenschaft (Stuttgart, 1893–) III 973–85.
Easterling, P. E. (1973). ‘Presentation of character in Aeschylus’, G. & R. 20: 3–19.
Easterling, P. E. (1974). ‘Alcman 58 and Simonides 37’, P.C.Ph.S. n.s. 20: 37–43.
Easterling, P. E. (1978). ‘The second stasimon of Antigone’, in Dawe, R. D., Diggle, J., Easterling, P. E., ed. Dionysiaca. Cambridge.
Ebert, J. (1978). ‘Zu Corinnas Gedicht vom Wettstreit zwischen Helikon und Kith-airon’, Z.P.E. 30: 5–12.
Edmunds, L. (1975). Chance and intelligence in Thucydides. Cambridge, Mass.
Edwards, G. P. (1971). The language of Hesiod. Publications of the Philological Society xxii. Oxford.
Ehrenberg, V. L. (1951). The people of Aristophanes. 2nd ed. Oxford. (3rd ed. New York 1962).
Eliot, T. S. (1926). Introduction to Savonarola: a dramatic poem, by Eliot, Charlotte. London.
Else, G. F. (1965). The origin and early form of Greek tragedy. Cambridge, Mass.
Erbse, H. (1969–83). Scholia graeca in Homeri Iliadem. 6 vols. Berlin.
Fehling, D. (1971). Die Quellenangaben bei Herodot. Berlin.
Fenik, B. C. (1968). Typical battle scenes in the Iliad. Hermes Einzelschriften xxi.
Ferguson, J. (1975). Utopias of the classical world. Ithaca.
Finley, J. H. jr. (1938). ‘Euripides and Thucydides’, H.S.C.Ph. 49: 23–68.
Finley, J. H. jr. (1940). ‘The unity of Thucydides' history’, H.S.C.Ph. Suppl. Vol. 1. 255–97.
Finley, J. H. jr. (1942). Thucydides. Cambridge, Mass.
Finley, M. I. (1956). The world of Odysseus. London. (2nd ed. London 1977).
Fornara, C. W. (1971a). ‘Evidence for the date of Herodotus' publication’, J.H.S. 91: 25–34.
Fornara, C. W. (1971b). Herodotus: an interpretative essay. Oxford.
Forrest, W. G. (1968). A history of Sparta, 950–192 B.C. London.
Fraenkel, E. (1922). Plauteinisches im Plautus. Berlin.
Fraenkel, E. (Revised as Elementi plautini in Plauto, Florence 1960).
Fraenkel, E. (1950). ‘Some notes on the Hoopoe's song’, Eranos 48: 75–84 = Kleine Beiträge I (1964) 453–61.
Fränkel, H. (1961). ‘Schrullen in den Scholien zu Pindars Nemeen 7 und Olympien 3’, Hermes 83: 385–97.
Fränkel, H. (1962). Dichtung und Philosophic des frühen Griechentums. 2nd ed. (Engl. tr. as Fränkel 1975).
Fränkel, H. (1975). Early Greek poetry and philosophy. New York & London. (Tr. of Fränkel 1962).
Fraser, P. M. (1972). Ptolemaic Alexandria. 3 vols. Oxford.
Frede, M. (1974). Die stoische Logik. Göttingen.
Fritz, K. von (1967). Griechische Geschichtsschreibung I. Berlin.
Furley, D. J. (1973).‘Notes on Parmenides’, in Vlastos, G., ed., Exegesis and argument: Studies in Greek philosophy presented to Gregory Vlastos, 1–15. Assen.
Galinsky, G. K. (1969). Aeneas, Sicily, and Rome. Princeton, N.J..
Garrod, H. W. (1920). ‘The hyporcheme of Pratinas’, C.R. 34: 129–36.
Gärtner, H. (1967). ‘Xenophon von Ephesos’, Pauly-G., A. Wissowa-W., Kroll, Real–Encyclopädie derklassischen Alttertumswissenschaft (Stuttgart, 1893–) ixa.2 2055–89.
Garvie, A. F. (1965). ‘A note on the deity of Alcman's Partheneion’, C.Q. n.s. 15: 185–7.
Garvie, A. F. (1969). Aeschylus' Supplices: play and trilogy. Cambridge.
Garzya, A. (1954). Alcmane. I frammenti. Naples.
Gelzer, T. (1956). ‘Aristophanes und sein Sokrates’, M.H. 13: 65–93.
Gelzer, T. (1960). Der epirrhematische Agon hei Aristophanes. Zetemata xxiii. Munich.
Gelzer, T. (1976). ‘Some aspects of Aristophanes’ dramatic art in the Birds', B.I.C.S. 23: /1–14.
Gentili, B. (1958). Bacchilide. Studi. Urbino.
Gentili, B. (1971). ‘I frr. 39 e 40 di Alcmane e la poetica della mimesi nella cultura greca arcaica’, in Studi filologici e storici in onore de V. de Falco, 59–67. Naples.
Gentili, B. (1972). ‘Lirica greca arcaica e tardo-arcaica’, in Introduzione allo studio della cultura classica. Milan.
Gentili, B. (1976). Review of Page, D., PMG, LGS, SLG, in Gnomon 48: 740–51.
Gerber, D. E. (1967/8). ‘A survey of publications on Greek lyric poetry since 1952, iii’, C.W. 61: 373–85.
Gerber, D. E. (1970). Euterpe, an anthology of early Greek lyric and iambic poetry. Amsterdam.
Gerber, D. E. (1975/6). ‘Studies in Greek lyric poetry: 1967–75’, C.W. 70: 66–154.
Ghiron-Bistagne, P. (1976). Recherches sur les acteurs dans la Grèce antique. Paris.
Giannini, A. (1960). ‘La figura del cuoco nella commedia greca’, Acme 13: 135–216.
Gianotti, G. F. (1975). Per una poetica pindarica. Torino.
Gianotti, G. F. (1978). ‘Le Pleiadi di Alcmane’, R.F.I.C. 106: 257–71.
Gigante, M. (1969). Ricerche Filodemee. Naples.
Goldstein, J. A. (1968). The letters of Demosthenes. New York.
Gomme, A. W. (1938). ‘Aristophanes and polities’, C.R. 52: 97–119. (Repr. in Campbell, D. A., ed., More essays in Greek history and literature (Oxford 1962)).
Gomme, A. W. (1954a). ‘Who was “Kratippos”?’, C.Q. n.s. 4: 53–5.
Gomme, A. W. (1954b). The Greek attitude to poetry and history. Berkeley & Los Angeles.
Gomme, A. W. (1956). A historical commentary on Thucydides II. Oxford. (See also Gomme et al. (1945–70)).
Gomme, A. W. (1957). ‘Interpretations of some poems of Alkaios and Sappho’, J.H.S. 77: 255–66.
Gomme, A. W. et al. (1945–70). A historical commentary on Thucydides. Oxford.
Gomme, A. W. and Sandbach, F. H. (1973). Menander: a commentary. Oxford.
Gomperz, H. (1912). Sophistik und Rhetorik. Leipzig.
Gostoli, A. (1978). ‘Some aspects of the Theban myth in the Lille Stesichorus’, G.R.B.S. 19: 23–7.
Gottschalk, H. B. (1980). Heraclides of Pontus. Oxford.
Grant, M. (1978). History of Rome. New York.
Griffin, J. (1977). ‘The Epic Cycle and the uniqueness of Homer’. J.H.S. 97: 39–53.
Griffin, J. (1980). Homer on life and death. Oxford.
Griffith, J. G. (1968). ‘Early lyric poetry’, in (ed.) Platnauer, M., Fifty years (and twelve) of classical scholarship (Oxford, 1968), ch. 2. Oxford.
Griffith, M. (1977). The authenticity of Prometheus Bound. Cambridge.
Griffiths, A. (1972). ‘Alcman's Partheneion: The morning after the night before’, Q.U.C.C. 14: 7–30.
Grube, G. M. A. (1965). The Greek and Roman critics. London.
Guarducci, M. (1974). Epigrafia Greca III. Rome.
Guillon, P. (1958). ‘Corinne et les oracles béotiens: la consultation d'Asopos’, B.C.H. 82: 47–60.
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1957). ‘Aristotle as a historian of philosophy’, J.H.S. 77: 35–41.
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1962–80). A history of Greek philosophy. 6 vols. Cambridge.
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1962). A history of Greek philosophy I. Cambridge.
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1965). A history of Greek philosophy II. Cambridge.
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1969). A history of Greek philosophy III. Cambridge.
Habicht, C. (1969). Die Inschriften des Asklepieions: Altertümer von Pergamon viii 3. Berlin.
Hagedorn, D. (1964). Zur Ideenlehre des Hermogenes. Göttingen.
Halporn, J. W. (1972). ‘Agido, Hagesichora, and the chorus (Alcman i.27ff. PMG)’, Antidosis, Festschrift für Walter Kraus, W.S. Beiheft v 125–38.
Hamilton, R. (1974). Epinikion. The Hague.
Hamm, E.-M. (1958). Grammatik zu Sappho und Alkaios. Berlin.
Händel, P. (1963). Formen und Darstellungen in der aristophanischen Komödie. Heidelberg.
Handley, E. W. (1953). ‘XOPOY in the Plums’, C.Q. n.s. 3: 55–61.
Handley, E. W. (1959). Review of Newiger, H. J., Metapher und Allegoric, in J.H.S. 79: 166–7.
Handley, E. W. (1965a). The Dyskolos of Menander. London & Cambridge, Mass.
Handley, E. W. (1965b). ‘Notes on the Sikyonios of Menander’, B.I.C.S. 12: 38–62.
Handley, E. W. (1968). Menander and Plautus: a study in comparison. (Inaugural lecture) London.
Handley, E. W. (1969). ‘Notes on the Theophoroumene of Menander’, B.I.C.S. 16: 88–101.
Handley, E. W. (1973). ‘The poet inspired?’, J.H.S. 93: 104–8.
Handley, E. W. (1975a). ‘Plautus and his public: some thoughts on New Comedy in Latin’, Dioniso 46: 117–32.
Handley, E. W. (1975b). ‘Some new fragments of Greek comedy’, Proc. xiv int. congr. papyrologists, 1974, 133–48.
Handley, E. W. (1977). ‘P. Oxy. 678: a fragment of New Comedy’, B.I.C.S. 24: 132–4.
Handley, E. W. (1979). ‘Recent papyrus finds: Menander’, B.I.C.S. 26: 81–7.
Handley, E. W. (1982a). ‘P. Oxy. 2806: a fragment of Cratinus?’, B.I.C.S. 29: 109–17.
Handley, E. W. (1982b). ‘Aristophanes' rivals’, Proc. Class. Ass. 79: 23–5.
Handley, E. W. and Rea, J. R. (1957). The Telephus of Euripides. B.I.C.S. suppl. V.
Harrison, E. B. (1976). ‘The Portland Vase: thinking it over’, in Bonfante, L. and Heintze, H., edd., Essays in memoriam Otto J. Brendel. Mainz.
Harvey, F. D. (1964). ‘The use of written documents in the business life of classical Athens’, Pegasus 2: 4–14.
Harvey, F. D. (1966). ‘Literacy in the Athenian democracy’, R.E.G. 79: 585–635.
Harvey, F. D. (1967). ‘Oxyrhynchus Papyrus 2390 and early Spartan history’, J.H.S. 93: 62–73.
Harvey, F. D. (1978). ‘Greeks and Romans learn to write’, in Communication arts in the ancient world, 63–78. New York.
Haslam, M. W. (1974). ‘Stesichorean meter’, Q.U.C.C. 17: 9–57.
Haslam, M. W. (1978). ‘The versification of the new Stesichorus (P. Lille 76 abc)’, G.R.B.S. 19: 29–57.
Havelock, E. (1963). Preface to Plato. Cambridge, Mass.
Havelock, E. (1976). Origins of Western literacy. Toronto.
Heidel, W. A. (1935). ‘Hecataeus and the Egyptian priests in Herodotus, Book ii’, Memoirs of the Am. Academy of Arts and Sciences xviii.2 53–124.
Henderson, J. (1975). The maculate muse: obscene language in Attic comedy. New Haven.
Herington, C. J. (1970). The author of the Prometheus Bound. Austin, Texas.
Heubeck, A. (1979). Schrift in Archaeologica Homerica iii, ch. X. Göttingen.
Hirmer, M. and Arias, P. E. (1962). A history of Greek vase painting. London.
Hodgart, M. (1969). Satire. London.
Hofmann, H. (1976). Myihos und Komödie. Spudasmata xxx. Hildesheim.
Hofmann, W. and Wartenberg, G. (1973).‘Der Bramarbas in der antiken Komödie’, Abh. der Akad. der Wiss. der DDR, 1973.2.
Horrocks, G. C. (1981). Space and time in Homer. New York.
House, H. (1956). Aristotle's Poetics. London.
Hunter, R. L. (1979). ‘The comic chorus in the fourth century’, Z.P.E. 36: 23–38.
Husman, H. (1955). ‘Zu Metrik und Rhythmik des Mesomedes’, Hermes 83: 231–6.
Hussey, E. (1972). The Presocratics. London.
Huxley, G. L. (1962). Early Sparta. London.
Huxley, G. L. (1964). ‘Studies in early Greek poets ii: Alcman's Kolymbōsai’, G.R.B.S. 5: 26–8.
Immerwahr, H. R. (1964). ‘Book rolls on Attic vases’, in Classical, medieval and renaissance studies in honor of Berthold Louis Ullman I. Rome.
Immerwahr, H. R. (1966). Form and thought in Herodotus. Cleveland.
Immerwahr, H. R. (1973). ‘More book rolls on Attic vases’, Antike Kunst xvi.2 143–7.
Irigoin, J. (1962). ‘Survie et renouveau de la littérature antique à Constantinople’, C.C.M. 5: 287–302.
Jacoby, F. (1912). ‘Hekataios’, Pauly-G., A. Wissowa-W., Kroll, Real–Encyclopädie derklassischen Alttertumswissenschaft (Stuttgart, 1893–) vii 2666–2769. (Reprinted in Jacoby (1956) 185–237).
Jacoby, F. (1913). ‘Herodotos’, Pauly-G., A. Wissowa-W., Kroll, Real–Encyclopädie derklassischen Alttertumswissenschaft (Stuttgart, 1893–) suppl. II 247ff. Stuttgart. (Reprinted in Jacoby (1956) 7–164).
Jacoby, F. (1941). ‘The date of Archilochus’, C.Q. 35: 97–109.
Jacoby, F. (1949). Atthis: the local chronicles of ancient Athens. Oxford.
Jacoby, F. (1956). Griechische Historiker. Stuttgart.
Jacques, J. M. (1960). ‘Sur un acrostiche d'Aratos (Phén. 783–7)’, Revue des Études Anciennes 62: 48–61.
Jaeger, W. (1923). Aristoteles, Grundlegung einer Geschichte seiner Entwicklung. Berlin. 2nd ed. tr. Robinson, R. (1948). Aristotle: fundamentals of the history of his development. Oxford.
Jaeger, W. (1938). Demosthenes. The origin and growth of his policy. Berkeley.
Jaeger, W. (1939). Paideia: the ideals of Greek culture I, tr. Highet, G.. Oxford.
Jaeger, W. (1945). Paideia: the ideals of Greek culture III, tr. Highet, G.. Oxford.
Jaeger, W. (1947). The theology of the early Greek philosophers. Oxford.
Janáček, K. (1948). Prolegomena to Sextus Empiricus. Olomouc.
Janko, R. (1982). Homer, Hesiod, and the Hymns. Cambridge.
Janni, P. (1965, 1970). La cultura di Sparta arcaica. Ricerche I, II. Rome.
Jebb, R. C. (1893). The Attic orators. London.
Jeffery, L. H. (1961). The local scripts of archaic Greece. Oxford.
Jensen, C. (1923). (ed.) Philodemos Über die Gedichte Buch 5. Berlin.
Jones, A. H. M. (1940). The Greek city from Alexander to Justinian. Oxford.
Jones, A. H. M. (1963). ‘The Greeks under the Roman empire’, D.O.P. 17: 3–19.
Jones, J. (1962). On Aristotle and Greek tragedy. London.
Jones, W. H. S. (1923). Hippocrates I. Loeb Classical Library London & Cambridge, Mass.
Kahn, C. H. (1960). Anaximander and the origins of Greek cosmology. New York.
Kaiser, M. (1969). ‘Herodots Begegnung mit Ägypten’, in Morenz, S. Die Begegnung Europas mit Ägypten, 243–65. Zurich.
Kapsomenos, S. G. (1964). ‘The Orphic papyrus roll of Thessalonica’, Bulletin of the American Society of Papyrologists 2: 3–14.
Kennedy, G. (1959). ‘Focusing of arguments in Greek deliberative oratory’, T.A.Ph.A. 90: 131–8.
Kennedy, G. (1963). The art of persuasion in Greece. Princeton, N.J..
Kerferd, G. B. (1981). The sophistic movement. Cambridge.
Kern, O. (1922). Orphicorum fragmenta. Berlin.
Keydell, R. (1952). ‘Bemerkungen zu griechischen Epigrammen’, Hermes 80: 499–500.
Kirk, G. S. (1962). The songs of Homer. Cambridge.
Kirk, G. S. (1976). Homer and the oral tradition. Cambridge.
Kirk, G. S. (1977). In Archilochos by Ayrton, Michael. London.
Kirk, G. S. and Raven, J. (1957). The Presocratic philosophers. Cambridge.
Kirkwood, G. M. (1953/4). ‘A survey of recent publications concerning Classical Greek lyric poetry’, C.W. 47: 51–4.
Kirkwood, G. M. (1974). Early Greek monody. Cornell Studies in Classical Philology xxxvii. Ithaca & London.
Kleberg, T. (1967). Buchhandel und Verlagswesen in der Antike. Darmstadt.
Knox, B. M. W. (1952). ‘The lion in the house’, C.Ph. 47: 17–25. (= Word and action (Baltimore 1979) 27–38).
Knox, B. M. W. (1964). The heroic temper. Berkeley & Los Angeles.
Knox, B. M. W. (1968). ‘Silent reading in antiquity’, G.R.B.S. 9.4: 421–35.
Knox, B. M. W. (1976). ‘Euripides' Medea’, Y.Cl.S. 25: 193–206.
Koenen, L. (1979). The Cairo codex of Menander (P. Cair. J 43277). A photographic edition prepared under the supervision of Henry Riad and Abd el-Kadr Selim, with a preface by Koenen, L.. London, Institute of Classical Studies.
Köhnken, A. (1971). Die Funktion des Mythos bei Pindar. Berlin & New York.
Körte, A. (1893). ‘Archäologische Studien zur alten Komödie’, J.D.A.I. 8: 61–93.
Krüger, K. W. (1832). Untersuchungen über das Leben des Thukydides. Berlin.
Kühn, J. H. (1956). ‘System- und Methodenprobleme im Corpus Hippocraticum’, Hermes Einzelschriften xvi.
Kühne, H. J. (1969). ‘AppianshistoriographischeLeistung’, W. Z. Rostock 18: 345–77.
Labarbe, J. (1948). L'Homère de Platon (= Bibliothèque de la Faculté de Philos. et Lettres de l'Université de Liège, fasc. cxvii).
Lang, M. (1976). The Athenian Agora xxi. Graffiti and dipinti. Princeton. B1, B2, C5.
Lasserre, F. and Bonnard, A. (1958). Archiloque, Fragments. Paris.
Lattimore, R. (1958). The poetry of Greek tragedy. Baltimore.
Lavency, M. (1964). Aspects de la logographie judiciaire attique. Louvain.
Lee, H. D. P. (1948). ‘Place-names and the date of Aristotle's biological works’, C.Q. 42: 61–7.
Lefèvre, E. (1979). ‘Menander’, in Seeck, G. A., ed., Das griechische Drama, 307–53. Darmstadt.
Lefkowitz, M. R. (1968). ‘Bacchylides' Ode 5: imitation and originality’, H.S.C.Ph. 73: 45–96.
Lefkowitz, M. R. (1975a). ‘The influential fictions in the scholia to Pindar's Pythian 8’, C.Ph. 70: 173–85.
Lefkowitz, M. R. (1975b). ‘Pindar's Lives’, in Classica et Iberica, a Festschrift in Honor of the Rev. Marique, J. M. F., S.J., ed. Brannan, P. T., S.J., Institute for Early Christian Iberian Studies (Worcester, Mass.), 71–93.
Lefkowitz, M. R. (1978). ‘The poet as hero: fifth-century autobiography and subsequent biographical fiction’, C.Q. n.s. 28: 459–69.
Lemerle, P. (1969). ‘Elèves et professeurs à Constantinople au Xe siècle’, C.R.A.I. 576–87.
Lemerle, P. (1971). Le premier humanisme byzantin. Paris.
Leo, F. (1895). Plautinische Forschungen. 2nd ed. 1912. Berlin.
Levi, P. (1977). Review of Strid, O., Über Sprache und Stil des Periegeten Pausanias, in C.R. 27: 178–80.
Lewis, N. (1974). Papyrus in classical antiquity. Oxford.
Lloyd-Jones, H. (1956). ‘Zeus in Aeschylus’, J.H.S. 76: 55–67.
Lloyd-Jones, H. (1957). Aeschylus II. 2nd ed. Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge, Mass. & London).
Lloyd-Jones, H. (1966). ‘Problems of early Greek tragedy’, in Estudios sobre la tragedia griega, Cuadernos de la Fondación Pastor XIII 11–33.
Lloyd-Jones, H. (1971). The justice of Zeus. Berkeley & Los Angeles.
Lloyd-Jones, H. (1973). ‘Modern interpretation of Pindar: the Second Pythian and Seventh Nemean Odes’, J.H.S. 93: 109–37.
Lloyd-Jones, H. (1975). Females of the species: Semonides on women. London.
Lobel, E. (1925). Σαπφοῦς μἐλη. Oxford.
Lobel, E. (1927). Ἀλκαíου μἐλη. Oxford.
Long, A. A. (1968). Language and thought in Sophocles. London.
Long, A. A. (1971). ‘Aisthesis, prolepsis and linguistic theory in Epicurus’, B.I.C.S. 18: 114–33.
Long, A. A. (1974). Hellenistic philosophy. London.
Long, A. A. (1976). ‘Heraclitus and Stoicism’, Philosophia 5–6: 134–56.
Lucas, D. W. (1968). Aristotle, Poetics. Oxford.
Luck, G. (1967). Review of Gow–Page, Hellenistic Epigrams, G.G.A. 219 (1967) 23–61.
Ludwig, W. (1970). ‘Die plautinische Cistellaria und das Verhältnis von Gott und Handlung bei Menander’, in Entretiens Hardt 16: 43–110.
Luppe, W. (1980). Literarische Texte: Drama. Archiv für Papyrusforschung 27: 233–50.
Luschnat, O. (1971). ‘Thukydides’, Pauly-G., A. Wissowa-W., Kroll, Real–Encyclopädie derklassischen Alttertumswissenschaft (Stuttgart, 1893–) suppl. XII 1085–1354.
Luschnat, O. (1974). ‘Thukydides (Nachträge)’, Pauly-G., A. Wissowa-W., Kroll, Real–Encyclopädie derklassischen Alttertumswissenschaft (Stuttgart, 1893–) suppl. xiv.
Lynch, J. P. (1972). Aristotle's school. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London.
Maass, E. (1898). Commentariorum in Aratum reliquiae. Berlin.
MacDowell, D. (1962). Andocides. On the mysteries. Oxford.
MacDowell, D. (1971). Aristophanes, Wasps. Oxford.
Maehler, H. (1976). ‘Der Metiochos-Parthenope-Roman’, Z.P.E. 23: 1–20.
Maehler, H. (1980). ‘A new method of dismounting papyrus cartonnage’, B.I.C.S. 27: 120–2.
Marrou, H.-I. (1965). Histoire de l'éducation dans l'antiquité. 6th ed. Paris.
Marzullo, B. (1964). ‘Il primo Partenio di Alcmane’, Philologus 108: 174–210.
Mates, B. (1953). Stoic logic. Berkeley & Los Angeles.
Mathieu, G. (1948). Démosthène. L'homme et l'oeuvre. Paris.
Mazon, P. (1904). Essai sur la composition des comédies d'Aristophane. Paris.
Mazon, P. (1948). (ed.) Introduction à l'Iliade. Budé. Paris.
McKay, K. J. (1974). ‘Alkman Fr. 107 Page’, Mnemosyne 4.27: 413–14.
Meiggs, R. and Lewis, D. M. (1969). A selection of Greek historical inscriptions to the end of the fifth century B.C. Oxford.
Meillier, C. (1976). ‘Callimaque (P.L. 76d, 78abc, 82, 84, 111c) Stésichore (?) (P.L. 76abc)’, Cahiers de recherche de l'Institut de Papyrologie et d'Égyptologie de l'Université de Lille IV: 255–360.
Mensching, E. (1963). Favorin von Arelate. Der erste Teil der fragmente. Berlin.
Merkelbach, R. (1962). Roman und Mysterium in der Antike. Munich & Berlin.
Merkelbach, R. (1974). ‘Epilog des einen der Herausgeber’, in Merkelbach, R. and West, M., ‘Ein Archilochos-Papyrus’, Z.P.E. 14: 97–113.
Mette, H. J. (1959). Die Fragmente der Tragödien des Aischylos. Berlin.
Millar, F. (1977). The emperor in the Roman world. London.
Milne, J. G. (1908). ‘Relics of Graeco-Egyptian schools’, J.H.S. 28: 121–32.
Misch, G. (1950). History of autobiography in antiquity. London.
Momigliano, A. D. (1966). ‘The place of Herodotus in the history of historiography’, in Studies in historiography. London, 127ff.
Momigliano, A. D. (1971). The development of Greek biography. Cambridge, Mass.
Momigliano, A. D. (1975). Alien wisdom. Cambridge.
Moraux, P. (1973). Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen I. Berlin, New York.
Morrison, J. S. (1961). ‘Antiphon’, P.C.Ph.S. n.s. 7: 49–58.
Mourelatos, A. P. D. (1970). The route of Parmenides: a study of word, image, and argument in the fragments. New Haven & London.
Murray, G. (1933). Aristophanes: a study. Oxford.
Muscarella, O. W. (1974). Ancient art: The Norbert Schimmel Collection. Mainz.
Mussche, H. F. and others (1965). Thorikos 111. Brussels.
Myres, J. L. (1953). Herodotus father of history. Oxford.
Nagy, G. (1973). ‘On the death of Actaeon’, H.S.C.Ph. 77: 179–80.
Navarre, O. (1900). Essai sur la rhétorique grecque avant Aristote. Paris.
Nenci, G. (1954). Hecataei Milesii fragmenta. Florence.
Nestle, W. (1901). Euripides. Der Dichter der griechischen Aufklärung. Stuttgart.
Newiger, H.-J. (1957). Metapher und Allegorie: Studien zu Aristophanes. Zetemata XVI. Munich.
Norman, A. F. (1960).‘The book trade in fourth-century Antioch’, J.H.S. 80: 122–6.
Norwood, G. (1931). Greek comedy. London.
Norwood, G. (1945). Pindar. Berkeley & Los Angeles.
Nutton, V. (1972). ‘Galen and medical autobiography’, P.C.Ph.S. n.s. 18: 50–62.
Oeri, H. G. (1948). Der Typ des komischen Alten: seine Nachwirkungen und seine Herkunft. Basel.
Oertel, F. (1970). Herodots Ägyptischer Logos und die Glaubwürdigkeit Herodots. Bonn.
Ohly, K. (1928). Stichometrische Untersuchungen = Zentralblatt für Bibliothekswesen, Beiheft 61. Leipzig.
Owen, A. S. (1936). ‘The date of the Electra of Sophocles’, in Greek poetry and life, Essays presented to Gilbert Murray, ed. Bailey, C. and others. Oxford.
Owen, G. E. L. (1960). ‘Eleatic questions’, C.Q. n.s. 10: 84–102; repr. with additional notes in Furley, D. J. and Allen, R. E., eds. (1975) Studies in presocratic philosophy II 48–81. London.
Page, D. L. (1942). Greek literary papyri. London.
Page, D. L. (1951a). Alcman: The Partheneion. Oxford.
Page, D. L. (1951b). ‘Simonidea’, J.H.S. 71: 133–42.
Page, D. L. (1951c). A new chapter in the history of Greek tragedy. Cambridge.
Page, D. L. (1953). ‘Thucydides' description of the great plague at Adiens’, C.Q. n.s. 3: 97–115.
Page, D. L. (1955). Sappho and Alcaeus. Oxford.
Page, D. L. (1956). ‘Greek verses from the eighth century B.C.’, C.R. n.s. 6: 95–7.
Page, D. L. (1959). History and the Homeric Iliad. Berkeley & Los Angeles.
Page, D. L. (1964). ‘Archilochus and the oral tradition’, in Entretiens Hardt 10: 117–63. Geneva.
Page, D. L. (1973a). ‘Stesichorus: The Geryoneis’, J..H..S. 93: 136–54.
Page, D. L. (1973b). ‘Stesichorus: The “Sack of Troy” and “The Wooden Horse” (P. Oxy. 2169 and 2803)’, P.C.Ph.S. n.s. 19: 47–65.
Panofsky, D. and , E. (1962). Pandora's box. 2nd ed. Princeton, N. J..
Papanikolaou, A. D. (1973). Chariton-Studien. Hypomnemata xxxvii. Göttingen.
Parry, A. (1971). (ed.) The making of Homeric verse (collected works of Milman Parry with an introduction by Adam Parry). Oxford.
Parry, A. (1981). ‘Logos’ and ‘Ergon’ in Thucydides. New York.
Parsons, P. J. (1977). ‘The Lille “Stesichorus”’, Z.P.E. 26: 7–36.
Patzer, H. (1937). Das Problem der Geschichtsschreibung des Thukydides und die thukydi-deische Frage. Berlin.
Pavese, C. O. (1967). ‘Alcmane, il Partenio del Louvre’, Q.U.C.C. 4: 113–33.
Pavese, C. O. (1972). Tradizione e generi poetici delta Grecia arcaica. Rome.
Payne, H. (1931). Necrocorinthia. Oxford.
Pearson, L. (1939). Early Ionian historians. Oxford.
Pearson, L. (1952). ‘Prophasis and aitia’, T.A.Ph.A. 83: 205–23.
Pearson, L. (1964).‘The development of Demosthenes as a political orator’, Phoenix 18: 95–109.
Pearson, L. (1966). ‘Apollodorus, the eleventh Attic orator’, The classical tradition. Literary and historical studies in honor of Harry Caplan, pp. 347–59. Ithaca.
Pearson, L. (1972). ‘Prophasis: a clarification’, T.A.Ph.A. 103: 381–94.
Pečirka, J. (1963). ‘Aristophanes' Ekklesiazusen und die Utopien in der Krise der Polis’, Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Humboldt Universität, Berlin: Gesellschaft. u. sprach. 12: 215–19.
Pečirka, J. (1976). ‘The crisis of the Athenian Polis in the fourth century’, Eirene 14: 5–29.
Penwill, J. L. (1974). ‘Alcman's Cosmogony’, Apeiron 8: 13–39.
Perrotta, G. and Gentili, B. (1965). Polinnia. Messina & Florence.
Perry, B. E. (1952). Aesopica I. Urbana, Illinois.
Perry, B. E. (1965). Babrius and Phaedrus. Loeb Classical Library (London & Cambridge, Mass).
Perry, B. E. (1967). The ancient romances. A literary-historical account of their origins. Berkeley & Los Angeles.
Petri, R. (1963). Ueber den Roman des Chariton. Meisenheim am Glan.
Pfohl, G. (1968). (ed.) Das Alphabet. Wege der Forschung lxxxviii. Darmstadt.
Philippson, R. (1932). ‘Sokrates' Dialektik in der Wolken’, Rh.M. 81: 30–8.
Pickard-Cambridge, A. W. (1946). The theatre of Dionysus at Athens. Oxford.
Podlecki, A. J. (1971). ‘Stesichoreia’, Athenaeum 49: 313–27.
Pohlenz, M. (1933).‘To prepon. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des griechischen Geistes’, N.G.G. 1933: 53–92.
Pohlenz, M. (1937). Herodot der erste Geschichtsschreiber des Abendlandes. Berlin.
Pollitt, J. J. (1974). The ancient Greek view of art: criticism, history and terminology. New Haven & London.
Pouilloux, J. (1964). ‘Archiloque et Thasos: histoire et poésie’, in Entretiens Hardt 10: 1–27. Geneva.
Powell, J. E. (1939). The history of Herodotus. Cambridge.
Privitera, G. A. (1965). Laso di Ermione nella cultura ateniese e nella tradizione storiografica. Rome.
Puelma, M. (1977). ‘Die Selbstbeschreibung des Chores in Alkmans grossem Partheneion-Fragment’, M.H. 34: 1–55.
Radermacher, L. (1951). ‘Artium scriptores. Reste der voraristotelischen Rhetorik’, S.A.W.W. 227: 3.
Rau, P. (1967). Paratragodia: Untersuchung einer dramatischen Form des Aristophanes. Zetemata xlv. Munich.
Rawlings, H. R. (1981). The structure of Thucydides' history. Princeton, N.J..
Reardon, B. P. (1969). ‘The Greek novel’, Phoenix 23: 55–73.
Reardon, B. P. (1971). Courants littéraires grecs des IIe and IIIe siècles après J.C. Paris.
Reeve, M. D. (1971). ‘Hiatus in the Greek novelists’, C.Q. n.s. 21: 514–39.
Reinhardt, K. (1916). Parmenides und die Geschichte der griechischen Philosophie. Bonn.
Reinhardt, K. (1947). Sophokles. 3rd ed. Frankfurt am Main.
Reynolds, L. D. and Wilson, N. G. (1974). Scribes and scholars, 2nd ed. Oxford.
Richardson, N. J. (1974). The Homeric Hymn to Demeter. Oxford.
Robert, C. (1911). Die Masken der neueren attischen Komödie. Hallisches Winckel-mannsprogr. xxv. Halle a. S..
Robert, L. (1935). ‘Notes d'épigraphie hellénistique’, B.C.H. 59: 421–5 (= Opera minora selecta I (1969) 178–82. Amsterdam).
Robert, L. (1968). ‘De Delphes à l'Oxus. Inscriptions grecques nouvelles de la Bactriane’, C.R.A.I. 421–57.
Roberts, C. H. (1953). ‘Literature and society in the papyri’, M.H. 10: 264–79.
Roberts, C. H. (1954). ‘The codex’, P.B.A. 40: 169–204.
Roberts, C. H. (1970). ‘Books in the Graeco-Roman world and in the New Testament’, Cambridge History of the Bible I, 48–66. Cambridge.
Roberts, C. H. and Skeat, T. C. (1983). The birth of the codex. British Academy publications. Oxford.
Robertson, M. (1969). ‘Geryoneis: Stesichorus and the vase-painters’, C.Q. n.s. 19: 207–21.
Ronnet, G. (1951). Étude sur le style de Démosthène dans les discours politiques. Paris.
Rose, H. J. (1932). ‘Stesichorus and the Rhadine-Fragment’, C.Q. 26: 88–92.
Rosenmeyer, T. G. (1966). ‘Alcman's Partheneion I reconsidered’, G.R.B.S. 7: 321–59.
Ross, W. D. (1923). Aristotle. London.
Rostagni, A. (1955). Scritti minori. 3 vols. Turin.
Russell, D. A. (1964). Longinus on the sublime. Oxford.
Russell, D. A. (1973). Plutarch. London.
Russell, D. A. and Wilson, N. G. (1981). (edd.). Menander Rhetor, On epideictie oratory. Oxford.
Russell, D. A. and Winterbottom, M. (1972). Ancient literary criticism. Oxford.
Salmon, P. (1961). ‘Chariton d'Aphrodisas et la révoke égyptienne de 360 avant J.-C,Chronique d'Égypte 36: 365–76.
Sambursky, S. (1959). The physics of the Stoics. London.
Sandbach, F. H. (1975). The Stoics. London.
Sayce, A. H. (1883). Herodotos I–III. London.
Schadewaldt, W. (1928). Der Auf bau des Píndarischen Epinikion. Schriften der Königs-berger Gelehrten Gesellschaft. Geisteswiss. Klasse v.3. Halle.
Schadewaldt, W. (1929). Die Geschichtsschreibung des Thukydides. Berlin.
Scheller, P. (1911). De hellenistica historiae conscribendae arte. Leipzig.
Schlesinger, E. (1968). ‘Zu Pindar, Pyth. 12’, Hermes 96: 275–86.
Schmid, W. (1926). (ed.) Ps-Aristides, Libri rhetorici. BT. Leipzig & Stuttgart.
Schmid, W. (1948). ‘Das Sokratesbild der Wolken’, Philologus 97: 209–28.
Schröder, H. O. (1934). In Platonis Timaeum commentariorum fragmenta. BT. Leipzig & Stuttgart.
Schwartz, E. (1919). Das Geschichtswerk des Thukydides. Bonn.
Schwarze, J. (1971). Die Beurteilung des Perikles durch die attische Komödie und ihre historische und historiographische Bedeutung. Zetemata LI. Munich.
Sedley, D. N. (1974). ‘The structure of Epicurus On Nature’, Cronache Ercolanesi 4: 89–92.
Seeberg, A. (1971). Corinthian Komos vases. B.I.C.S. suppl. XXVII.
Segal, C. P. (1962). ‘Gorgias and the psychology of the logos’, H.S.C.Ph. 66: 99–155.
Segal, C. P. (1975). ‘Pebbles in golden urns: the date and style of Corinna’, Eranos 63: 1–8.
Segal, C. P. (1976). ‘Bacchylides reconsidered: epithets and the dynamics of lyric narrative’, Q.U.C.C. 22: 99–130.
Segal, C. P. (1977). ‘The myth of Bacchylides 17: heroic quest and heroic identity’, Eranos 74: 23–37.
Seidensticker, B. (1978). ‘Archilochus and Odysseus’, G.R.B.S. 19: 5–22.
Severyns, A. (1933). Bacchylide, Essai biographique. Liège & Paris.
Severyns, A. (1963). Recherches sur la Chrestomathie de Proclos IV (= Bibliothèque de la Facultéde Philos. et Lettres de l'Université de Liège, fasc. 170).
Shackleton Bailey, D.R. (1966). Cicero's letters to Atticus V. Cambridge.
Sifakis, G. M. (1971). Parabasis and animal choruses. London.
Simon, E. (1971). ‘Die “Omphale” des Demetrios’, A.A.: 199–206.
Simon, E. (1972). Das antike Theater. Heidelberg. (Tr. Vafopoulou-Richardson, C. E. (1982) London).
Sisti, F. (1965). ‘Le due Palinodie di Stesicoro’, Stud. Urb. 39: 303–13.
Skeat, T. C. (1956). ‘The use of dictation in ancient book production’, P.B.A. 42: 179–208.
Smith, A. H. (1898). ‘Illustrations to Bacchylides’, J.H.S. 18: 267–80.
Smyth, H. W. (1900). The Greek melic poets. London.
Snell, B. (1953). The discovery of the mind: the Greek origins of European thought, tr. Rosenmeyer, T. G.. Oxford.
Snell, B. and Maehler, H. (1975). Pindari carmina cum fragmentis. BT. Leipzig & Stuttgart.
Solmsen, F. (1931). ‘Antiphonstudien. Untersuchungen zur Entstehung der attischen Gerichtsrede’, Neue philologische Untersuchungen VIII. Berlin.
Solmsen, F. (1961). ‘Greek philosophy and the discovery of the nerves’, M.H. 18: 169–97.
Solmsen, F. (1975). Intellectual experiments of the Greek enlightenment. Princeton, N.J..
Sourdille, C. (1910). La durée et l'étendue du voyage d'Hérodote en Égypte. Paris.
Spiegelberg, W. (1929). The credibility of Herodotus' account of Egypt. Tr. Blackman, A. M.. Oxford.
Sprague, R. K. (1972). The older sophists. Columbia, South Carolina.
Stadter, P. A. (1973). (ed.) The speeches in Thucydides. Chapel Hill.
Stahl, H.-P. (1966). Thukydides; die Stellung des Menschen im geschichtlichen Prozess. Munich.
Steinmetz, P. (1960). ‘Menander und Theophrast’, Rh.M. 103: 185–91.
Stern, J. (1967). ‘The structure of Bacchylides' Ode 17’, R.B.Ph. 45: 40–7.
Stevenson, J. G. (1974). ‘Aristotle as historian of philosophy’, J.H.S. 94: 138–43.
Strid, O. (1976). Über Sprache und Stil des Periegeten Pausanias. Uppsala.
Strohmaier, G. (1976). ‘Übersehenes zur Biographie Lukians’, Philologus 120: 117–22.
Sutton, D. F. (1974a). The date of Euripides' Cyclops. Ann Arbor.
Sutton, D. F. (1974b). ‘A handlist of satyr plays’, H.S.C.Ph. 78: 107–43.
Svoboda, K. (1952). ‘Les idées de Pindare sur la poésie’, Aegyptus 32: 108–20.
Szepessy, T. (1975). ‘Die “Neudatierung” des Heliodorus und die Belagerung von Nisibis’, Eirene (= Actes de la XIIe conférence internationale d'études classiques). Amsterdam.
Taplin, O. (1975). ‘The title of Prometheus Desmotes’, J.H.S. 95: 184–6.
Tar´n, L. (1981). Speusippus of Athens: a critical study with a collection of the related texts and commentary. Leiden.
Tarditi, G. (1968). Archiloco. Rome.
Tarn, W. W. (1933). ‘Alexander the Great and the unity of mankind’, Proceedings of the British Academy 19: 123–66.
Thayer, H. S. (1975). ‘Plato's quarrel with poetry: Simonides’, J.H.I. 36: 3–26.
Thesleff, H. (1961). An introduction to the Pythagorean writings of the Hellenistic period. Acta Academiae Aboensis, Humaniora xxiv.3. Åbo.
Thesleff, H. (1965). The Pythagorean texts of the Hellenistic period. Acta Academiae Aboensis, Humaniora Ser. A. xxx.i. Åbo.
Thierfelder, A. (1956). ‘Römische Komödie’, Gymnasium 63: 326–45.
Thummer, E. (1968–9). Pindar, Die Isthmischen Gedichte. 2 vols. Heidelberg.
Tigerstedt, E. N. (1965). The legend of Sparta in classical antiquity. Lund.
Torrance, R. M. (1965). ‘Sophocles: some bearings’, H.S.C.Ph. 69: 269–327.
Trendall, A. D. (1967). Phlyax vases. 2nd ed. B.I.C.S. suppl. XIX.
Trendall, A. D. and Webster, T. B. L. (1971). Illustrations of Greek drama. London.
Treu, M. (1966). ‘Pseudo-Xenophon пO∧ITEIA AΘHNAIΩN’, Pauly-G., A. Wissowa-W., Kroll, Real–Encyclopädie derklassischen Alttertumswissenschaft (Stuttgart, 1893–) IXA.2 1928–1982. Stuttgart.
Treu, M. (1968a). ‘Alkman’, Pauly-G., A. Wissowa-W., Kroll, Real–Encyclopädie derklassischen Alttertumswissenschaft (Stuttgart, 1893–) suppl. XI 19–29.
Treu, M. (1968b). ‘Stesichoros’, Pauly-G., A. Wissowa-W., Kroll, Real–Encyclopädie derklassischen Alttertumswissenschaft (Stuttgart, 1893–) suppl. XI 1253–6.
Turner, E. G. (1952). Athenian books in the fifth and fourth centuries. Inaugural lecture. 2nd ed. 1978. London.
Turner, E. G. (1965). ‘Athenians learn to write: Plato's Protagoras 326a’, B.I.C.S. 12: 67–9.
Turner, E. G. (1968). Greek papyri. Oxford.
Turner, E. G. (1971). Greek manuscripts of the ancient world. Oxford.
Turner, E. G. (1973). The papyrologist at work. G.R.B.S. monograph VI.
Turner, E. G. (1976). ‘A fragment of Epicharmus? (or Pseudoepicharmea?)’, W.S. 89: 48–57.
Turner, E. G. (1978). ‘The lost beginning of Menander, Misoumenos’, Proc. Brit. Acad. 73: 315–31.
Turner, E. G. (1980). ‘The rhetoric of question and answer in Menander’, Themes in Drama 2: 1–23.
Untersteiner, M. (1954). The sophists, tr. Freeman, K.. Oxford.
Usher, S. (1973). ‘The style of Isocrates’, B.I.C.S. 20: 39–67.
Usher, S. (1976). ‘Lysias and his clients’, G.R.B.S. 17: 31–40.
Ussher, R. G. (1960). The Characters of Theophrastus. London.
Ussher, R. G. (1973). Aristophanes, Ecclesiazusae. Oxford.
Vallet, G. (1958). Rhégion et Zancle. Bibl. d'Écoles françaises d'Athènes et de Rome clxxxix. Paris.
Van Groningen, B. A. (1935/6). ‘The enigma of Alcman's Partheneion’, Mnemosyne ser. iii, 3: 241–61.
van Groningen, B. A. (1963). Traité d'histoire et de critique des textes grecs. Amsterdam.
Vermeule, E. (1966). ‘The Boston Oresteia Krater’, A.J.A. 70: 1–22.
Vernant, J.-P. (1980). Myth and society in ancient Greece, tr. Lloyd, J.. Brighton.
Vernant, J.-P. and Detienne, M. (1974). Les ruses de l'intelligence. La métis chez les grecs. Paris.
Vernant, J.-P. and Detienne, M. (Engl. tr. Cunning intelligence in Greek culture and society (1978) Hassocks).
Vickers, B. (1973). Towards Greek tragedy. London.
Voigt, E.-M. (1971). Sappho et Alcaeus. Amsterdam.
Vürtheim, J. (1919). Stesichoros' Fragmente und Biographie. Leiden.
Wace, A. J. B. and Stubbings, F. H. (1962). (edd.). A companion to Homer. London.
Wade-Gery, H. T. (1932). ‘Thucydides the son of Melesias’, J.H.S. 52: 205–27.
Wade-Gery, H. T. (1945). ‘Kritias and Herodes’, C.Q. 39: 19–33.
Wade-Gery, H. T. (1952). The poet of the Iliad. Cambridge.
Walbank, F. W. (1938). ΦI∧ΠΠOΣ TPAΓΩIΔOYMENOΣ, J.H.S. 68: 55–68.
Walbank, F. W. (1955). ‘Tragic history: a reconsideration’, B.I.C.S. 2: 4–14.
Walbank, F. W. (1972). Polybius. Berkeley & Los Angeles.
Webster, T. B. L. (1950). Studies in Menander. 2nd ed. 1960. Manchester.
Webster, T. B. L. (1952).‘Chronological notes on Middle Comedy’, C.Q. n.s. 2: 13–26.
Webster, T. B. L. (1959). Greek art and literature, 700–530 B.C. London.
Webster, T. B. L. (1965). ‘The poet and the mask’, in Anderson, M. J., ed., Classical drama and its influence: essays presented to H. D. F. Kitto, 3–13. London.
Webster, T. B. L. (1967). The tragedies of Euripides. London.
Webster, T. B. L. (1968). ‘Stesichoros: Geryoneis’, Agon 2: 1–9.
Webster, T. B. L. (1969). Monuments illustrating New Comedy. 2nd ed. B.I.C.S. suppl. XXIV.
Webster, T. B. L. (1970a). The Greek chorus. London.
Webster, T. B. L. (1970b). Studies in later Greek comedy. 2nd ed. Manchester.
Webster, T. B. L. (1974). Menander: an introduction. Manchester.
Webster, T. B. L. and Green, J. R. (1978). Webster, T. B. L., Monuments illustrating Old and Middle Comedy, 3rd ed. rev. and enlarged by Green, J. R.. B.I.C.S. suppl. XXXIX.
Wehrli, F. R. (1948). Motivstudien zur griechischen Komödie. Zurich & Leipzig.
Weitzmann, K. (1959). Ancient book illumination. Cambridge, Mass.
Weitzmann, K. (1970). Illustrations in roll and codex, 2nd ed. Princeton, N. J..
Welles, C. B., Fink, R. O. and Gilliam, J. F. (1959). The excavations at Dura-Europos, Final report V, part 1. The parchments and the papyri. New Haven.
Wells, J. (1923). ‘The Persian friends of Herodotus’, in Studies in Herodotus, 95–111. Oxford.
West, M. L. (1963). ‘Three Presocratic cosmologies’, C.Q. n.s. 13: 174–76 (154–60n Alcman).
West, M. L. (1965). ‘Alcmanica’, C.Q. n.s. 15: 188–202.
West, M. L. (1966). Hesiod, Theogony. Oxford.
West, M. L. (1967). ‘Alcman and Pythagoras’, C.Q. n.s. 17: 1–15.
West, M. L. (1969). ‘Stesichorus Redivivus’, Z.P.E. 4: 135–49.
West, M. L. (1970a). ‘Melica’, C.Q. n.s. 20: 205–15.
West, M. L. (1970b). ‘Corinna’, C.Q. n.s. 20: 277–87.
West, M. L. (1971a). ‘Stesichorus’, C.Q. n.s. 21: 302–14.
West, M. L. (1971b). ‘Further light on Stesichorus' Iliu Persis’, Z.P.E. 7: 262–4.
West, M. L. (1974). Studies in early Greek elegy and iambus. Berlin & New York.
West, M. L. (1975). ‘Cynaethus' Hymn to Apollo’, C.Q. n.s. 25: 161ff.
West, M. L. (1977). ‘Notes on Papyri’, Z.P.E. 26: 38–9.
West, M. L. (1978a). (ed.). Hesiod, Works and days. Oxford.
West, M. L. (1978b). Theognidis et Phocylidis fragmenta. Berlin.
West, S. (1967). The Ptolemaic papyri of Homer. (Papyrologica Coloniensia III). Cologne & Opladen.
West, S. (1974). ‘Joseph and Asenath: a neglected Greek romance’, C.Q. s. 24: 70–81.
Westlake, H. D. (1977). ‘Thucydides on Pausanias and Themistodes. A written source?’, C.Q. n.s. 37 (1977) 93–110.
Wevers, R. F. (1969). Isaeus. Chronology, prosopography, and social history. The Hague.
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von (1903). Timotheos: Die Perser. Leipzig.
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von (1925). Menander: Das Schiedsgericht. Berlin.
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von (1962). Kleine Schriften IV. Berlin.
Wilson, A. M. (1974). ‘A Eupolidean parallel for the rowing scene in AristophanesFrogs', C.Q. n.s. 24: 250–2.
Wilson, N. G. (1975). ‘Books and readers in Byzantium’, Byzantine books and bookmen. Dumbarton Oaks.
Wind, R. (1971–2). ‘Bacchylides and Pindar: A question of imitation’, C.J. 67: 9–13.
Winnington-Ingram, R. P. (1948). ‘Clytemnestra and the vote of Athena’, J.N.S. 68: 130–47.
Winnington-Ingram, R. P. (1965). ‘Tragedy and Greek archaic thought’, in Anderson, M. J., ed., Classical drama and its influence. London.
Wirth, T. (1967). ‘Arrians Erinnerungen an Epiktet’, M.H. 24: 149–89, 197–216.
Wolke, H. (1978). Untersuchungen zur Batrachomyomachia. Meisenheim am Glan.
Woodbury, L. E. (1967). ‘Helen and the Palinode’, Phoenix 21: 157–76.
Woodbury, L. E. (1976). ‘Aristophanes' Frogs and Athenian literacy: Ran. 52–53, 1114’, T.A.Ph.A. 106: 349–57.
Woodbury, L. E. (1979a). ‘Gold hair and grey, or the game of love: Anacreon fr. 13: 358 PMG, 13 Gentili’, T.A.Ph.A. 109: 277–87.
Woodbury, L. E. (1979b). ‘Neoptolemus at Delphi: Pindar, Nemean 7.30ff.’, Phoenix 33: 95–133.
Young, D. C. (1964). ‘Pindaric criticism’, Minnesota Review IV 584–641; repr. in Calder, W. M. III and Stern, J., edd. (1970) Pindaros und Bakchylides, 1–95. Darmstadt.
Zalateo, G. (1961). ‘Papiri scoiasrici’, Aegyptus 41: 160–235.
Zieliński, T. (1885). Die Gliederung der altattischen Komödie. Leipzig.
Zuntz, G. (1949). ‘Once again the Antiphontean Tetralogies’, M.H. 6: 100–3.
Zuntz, G. (1955). The political plays of Euripides. Manchester.
Zuntz, G. (1971). Persephone. Oxford.