Skip to main content
×
Home
The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy
    • Online ISBN: 9781139095433
    • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762168
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to? *
    ×
  • Buy the print book

Book description

The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy comprises over fifty specially commissioned essays by experts on the philosophy of this period. Starting in the late eighth century, with the renewal of learning some centuries after the fall of the Roman Empire, a sequence of chapters take the reader through developments in many and varied fields, including logic and language, natural philosophy, ethics, metaphysics, and theology. Close attention is paid to the context of medieval philosophy, with discussions of the rise of the universities and developments in the cultural and linguistic spheres. A striking feature is the continuous coverage of Islamic, Jewish, and Christian material. There are useful biographies of the philosophers, and a comprehensive bibliography. The volume illuminates a rich and remarkable period in the history of philosophy and will be the authoritative source on medieval philosophy for the next generation of scholars and students alike.

    • Aa
    • Aa
Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send:
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Page 1 of 2


  • 1 - Origins in Baghdad
    pp 9-25
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762168.003
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Philosophy died a lingering death before Islam appeared. The emphasis on the language is intended to highlight the fact that philosophy in antiquity was done in Greek. After the advent of Islam, the resurrection of philosophy as Arabic philosophy is intimately connected with the Graeco-Arabic translation movement that started in Baghdad shortly after its foundation in 762 and lasted through the end of the tenth century. Arabic philosophy internationalized Greek philosophy, and through its success it demonstrated to world culture that philosophy is a supranational enterprise. This, it seems, is what makes the transplantation and development of philosophy in other languages and cultures throughout the Middle Ages historically possible and intelligible. Colossal as al-Kindi's achievement (and that of the society which fostered it) was, the practice of his immediate line of successors slowly evaporated into apologetics. The cause of philosophy was taken up by a new generation of thinkers, however, who reintroduced it, as it were, to Baghdad.
  • 2 - The emergence of medieval Latin philosophy
    pp 26-38
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762168.004
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter first outlines the places, institutional and intellectual, where philosophy took place from the late eighth to the twelfth century. Philosophizing in medieval Latin Europe began in the eighth century, in the royal court of Charlemagne. The chapter looks at the ways in which thinkers thought philosophically within them, both externally, through written forms, and internally, through forms of argument. Grammar provided opportunities for philosophizing, in two distinct ways. First, the textbook for the advanced study of grammar was the Institutions, written by Priscian in the early sixth century. Second, ancient Latin texts were studied as part of grammar. The practice of commentary is central to how philosophy was taught and ideas were developed from mid-antiquity until the seventeenth century. The chapter also provides justification for naming the period of circa 780 - circa 1200, the early Middle Ages, as a discrete period in Latin philosophy.
  • 3 - Byzantium
    pp 39-49
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762168.005
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The Greek-speaking scholars of Byzantium have often been praised for their diligence in copying a great number of ancient philosophical texts. There is ample evidence that the Byzantines seriously engaged in a fervent dialogue with the different ancient philosophical traditions. This dialogue resulted in the composition of many philosophical works that belong to various genres of philosophical writing, including paraphrases, extended commentaries, commentaries in question-and-answer form and letters and orations with philosophical content. As with most issues, it has been widely supposed that Byzantine philosophers followed the Neoplatonic commentators of late antiquity with respect to their position on universals. According to Ammonius, the seal on the ring represents the universal before the many particulars, the imprint on the different pieces of wax represents the universal in the particulars, and the common characteristics as the observer mentally retains them represent the universal after the particulars. Many more Byzantine philosophers discussed the issue of universals, especially during the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries.
  • 4 - The rise of the universities
    pp 50-62
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762168.006
  • View abstract
    Summary
    In the fourteenth century formal universities were set up in German-speaking regions, the first so-called German university was constituted at Prague in 1348. By the end of the fifteenth century universities were to be found all over Europe. Responsible for the equivalent of the modern undergraduate education, the arts faculty was present at every university, usually dominating the governing apparatus and enrolling far and away the largest number of students. Within each faculty, it was the professors who established the curriculum, fixing the subject matter, required texts, and sequence of courses. Thomas the theologian continued to tackle issues of sometimes exclusively philosophical import, making room for them extensively in his theological writings. It is no accident that his Commentary on the Sentences and Summa theologiae figure prominently in discussions of medieval philosophy. Theological writings might easily be read and appreciated for their philosophical worth, without sacrificing even the most rigorous division between reason and revelation.
  • 5 - Monks and friars
    pp 63-75
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762168.007
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Most medieval Christian philosophers were clerics and priests, who staffed the schools in towns and cathedral cities. Many of these were also monks and friars. Monks contributed to philosophy in the cloisters of their monasteries and in universities, and friars also contributed both in the schools or studia of their orders and within universities. Monasteries and nunneries in medieval Europe were numerous. Some ran schools for boys or girls, while others were also important centers of scholarship and of book production. In Paris, Oxford, Cambridge, and elsewhere, as well as in Toulouse, mendicant studia generalia were implanted within university towns. In many important universities, including Oxford, the teaching of theology was at times dominated by mendicant friars. In some southern universities, where there was for a long period no faculty of theology, mendicant studia had a monopoly in the teaching of theology.
  • 6 - Platonism
    pp 76-85
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762168.008
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Medieval Platonism originated from two sources, a direct tradition, based on translations of Plato's own works, and an indirect one through the intermediary of authors who transmitted essential doctrines of Platonism in their own accounts. This chapter focuses on the Latin Plato as Raymond Klibansky stresses, a full understanding of the role of Platonism in the Middle Ages has to take the Arabic tradition into account. The information medieval thinkers had on Plato's philosophy was much more comprehensive than one would possibly expect on the basis of the few translations in the Plato Latinus. From the end of the thirteenth century an immediate knowledge of Proclus was possible through the Latin translation of some of his works. One should focus on the Proclus Latinus, since the translation Elementatio theologica had several effects on medieval philosophy. The Latin translation of the Timaeus provided an immediate access to Plato's teaching; an important secondary source was Augustine's short treatise Quaestio de ideis.
  • 7 - Augustinianism
    pp 86-98
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762168.009
  • View abstract
    Summary
    St. Augustine, bishop of Hippo, was both a theologian of great influence and a philosopher of remarkable originality. He helped shape Christian orthodoxy by identifying the Christian heresies of Pelagianism, Manicheanism, and Donatism, the first two of which have special philosophical interest. This chapter focuses on several features of Augustine's philosophical thinking: his first-person point of view, his doctrine of illumination, his ideas about the relationship between faith and reason, and his argument for the existence of God. Some other features that are discussed in the chapter are: his discussions of God's nature, his attempts to solve the problem of evil, his discussion of the problem of God's foreknowledge and human free will, his psychological voluntarism, and his internalism in ethics. Augustinians in the thirteenth century began to modify and adapt Augustine's teaching on illumination.
  • 8 - Censorship
    pp 99-113
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762168.010
  • View abstract
    Summary
    A great many medieval thinkers were involved in the process of censure, either as defendants or as members of an inquiry commission. Often nothing came of the process beyond suspicions or denunciations; other times judicial procedures were initiated. According to Godfrey, the articles condemned in 1277 hinder scientific progress, create scandal in the academic world, and are harmful to the irreplaceable doctrine of Thomas Aquinas. Within the Christian context, this chapter deals with extra-academic condemnations, including those that were prior to the creation of the universities. In his Dialogus, crafted after he had fled the pontifical court of Avignon to take refuge in Munich with the Emperor Ludwig of Bavaria, William of Ockham presents a set of conclusions in favor of the freedom of thought. Ockham died at the court of the emperor, most likely in 1347. The task of policing educational practices meant that the Ockhamist reading of it had to be proscribed.
  • 9 - Modernity
    pp 114-126
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762168.011
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Numerous elements in Rene Descartes's Meditations have been considered modern and contrasted with scholastic philosophy; these have included his use of radical skepticism and his appeal to the first-person perspective as the first principle of knowledge. The modernity of the cogito as first principle of knowledge derived through a skeptical method is challenged when one sees a cogito used as a response to Montaigne's and Charron's brand of skepticism. Although anti-scholasticism comes in countless forms during the seventeenth century, Cartesianism was clearly the "other doctrine" against which the 1671 decree was directed. A significant variation in late Aristotelian matter theory was the theory of minima naturalia, generally discussed in the context of rarefaction and condensation, or change of quantity. There is a natural minimum of any given element, which is to say that late scholasticism could countenance a kind of atomism. This doctrine of a natural minimum became a bridge between Aristotelian and alchemical theories of matter.
  • 10 - The development of logic in the twelfth century
    pp 127-145
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762168.012
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The twelfth century was one of the most important and exciting periods in the history of logic. This chapter focuses on the work done on theories of meaning, modality, and the relation of logical consequence. Peter Abaelard is the outstanding logician of this period and is, indeed, one of the greatest of all logicians. To grasp the importance and originality of Abaelard's work, it is first necessary to understand the character of the semantical and logical theories that Boethius bequeathed to the Middle Ages. Abaelard's essentialism and his theory of imposition entail that natural kind and proper names rigidly designate the kinds and the individuals on which they are imposed. The most characteristic feature of twelfth-century logical commentaries is their analysis of arguments in terms of the topical warrant involved. Abaelard's development of Boethius's treatments of conditional propositions and the topics into a unified treatment of inference is one of the most remarkable achievements in the history of logic.
  • 11 - Terminist logic
    pp 146-158
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762168.013
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Terminist logic is a specifically medieval development. Logic was at the heart of the arts curriculum, for it provided the techniques of analysis and much of the vocabulary found in philosophical, scientific, and theological writing. The core of the logic curriculum was provided by the works of Aristotle with supplements from Boethius, Porphyry, and the anonymous author of the Liber sex principiorum, once attributed to Gilbert of Poitiers. The new developments of the late twelfth and thirteenth centuries were presented via new techniques and new genres of writing. The new techniques grew out of late twelfth-century use of instantiae or counterexamples, and they involved the use of sophismata or puzzle-cases intended to draw attention to difficulties and weaknesses in logical definitions and rules. The vocabulary of supposition theory seems to be first found in the grammarians.
  • 12 - Nominalist semantics
    pp 159-172
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762168.014
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The most significant development in the history of late medieval philosophy and theology was the emergence of late medieval nominalism, eventually culminating in the quasi-institutional separation of the realist "old way" and the nominalist "modern way". This chapter discusses the fundamental changes in semantic theory initiated by William of Ockham, and brought to fruition by John Buridan. It begins with a brief sketch of those common characteristics of the "old semantics" that Ockham abandoned. After presenting Ockham's main reasons for breaking with the older model and sketching his alternative ideas, the chapter proceeds to a more detailed analysis of Buridan's radically new approach to constructing semantic theory. Buridan deploys an impressive array of arguments to show that logical validity in his framework cannot be defined in terms of truth, but rather in terms of the correspondence conditions of propositions in different possible situations.
  • 13 - Inferences
    pp 173-184
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762168.015
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Much of the recent attention of historians of medieval logic has focused on medieval semantics. This chapter focuses on the work done by the fourteenth-century Latin authors on the topic of inference. The medievals introduced many and varied divisions of consequentiae. One such division was between formal and material inference. In John Buridan and the Parisian tradition, a formal inference was indeed one that held solely in virtue of its form, whereas a material inference held in virtue of its descriptive terms. The idea of formal inference has been said to appear for the first time in Simon of Faversham at the end of the thirteenth century, and to be consolidated by William of Ockham in the early fourteenth century. Thomas Bradwardine's term intelligitur has been described as psychological or epistemic, and identified as a peculiarly English phenomenon, though mostly in English authors of the latter half of the fourteenth century.
  • 14 - Sophismata
    pp 185-195
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762168.016
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The medieval sophismata literature is a genre of academic argument that began to take shape by the early twelfth century and lasted to the end of the Middle Ages. This chapter offers the briefest overview of that literature. Plato's hostility to the sophists is well known, and indeed he is probably the one most responsible for the disparaging connotations 'sophist' and related words commonly have today. Sophisma and sophismata were taken over intact into classical Latin, where they were usually but not always used in the negative or pejorative sense. Sophisms cannot be sharply distinguished from other formats and styles of discussion in the Middle Ages. Still, one can find the word starting to be used with some frequency as early as Adam of Balsham's Ars disserendi, mainly as a way of describing fallacies of ambiguity.
  • 15 - Grammar
    pp 196-216
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762168.017
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter describes the major contribution of the modistae of the late thirteenth century. The group modistae is most closely associated with the development of theoretical grammar. The speculative grammarians took over an old idea, already found in the twelfth century, that words belonging to different word-classes can signify the same "thing" in different modes. The modistae devised a complex system to explain the relationship between language, thought, and things, inspired by Avicenna's theory of common natures. For the modistae, the independence of syntax from semantics was grounded in the Aristotelian potency-act distinction. The modes of signifying were the features of a word that gave it the potency to act or have a function in a given construction. The philosophical principles defined by the modistae became the target of strong criticism from the beginning of the fourteenth century onwards.
  • 16 - Natural philosophy in earlier Latin thought
    pp 217-231
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762168.018
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Modern scholars have commonly held that the beginnings of a scientific interest in natural phenomena among medieval authors appear only in the early twelfth century. Given the importance of authors such as Macrobius, one might suppose not only that their early medieval successors had a notion of physics but also that they identified it primarily with astronomy and only subsequently with other fields. This chapter focuses on two issues. The first issue is the late ancient heritage of natural philosophy within the realm of astronomy. The second issue is the "sublunar turn": natural questions and the search for the elements and principles of the physical cosmos. Early medieval scholars defend a geocentric worldview, which they owe to late ancient authors such as Macrobius and Pliny. The most detailed body of knowledge addresses the movements of the sun and the moon.
  • 17 - Creation and causation
    pp 232-246
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762168.019
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Medieval philosophers inherited the dominant philosophical view that the sensible world has always existed, a sempiternal beneficiary of an eternal agency. Despite the centrality of Aristotle for the tradition as a whole, early medieval cosmological speculation is best viewed as a series of attempted mediations between Scripture and the theoretical considerations introduced by Plato's Timaeus. Plato's philosophical authority is surpassed by Aristotle's while Moses is presented as holding the strictly opposing viewpoint of a creation out of nothing in a limited time. According to Averroes, when positing a God whose action consists in constantly recreating the world ex nihilo, the Muslim theologians did not postulate an Agent resembling empirical agents. As in the late ancient system, matter, form, and worldly motion become contributing causes which take a back seat to the more primal modes of truly efficient as well as final causation.
  • 19 - Change, time, and place
    pp 267-278
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762168.021
  • View abstract
    Summary
    For Aristotle, the natural world is the world of things subject to change. Accordingly, Aristotle's natural philosophy essentially consists in a philosophical investigation of change. The commentaries on the Physics from the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries are the main sources for the study of the Latin assimilation of Aristotle's natural philosophy. This chapter discusses three fundamental topics from medieval Latin philosophical discussions of Aristotle's natural philosophy: change, time, and place. Historically, Latin medieval philosophers were inspired to debate the ontological status of change by Averroes, whose commentary on the Physics was translated into Latin in the first half of the thirteenth century. An issue of major controversy among medieval commentators is what kind of attribute of change time is. Medieval commentators generally agree with Aristotle that place must be defined without positing the existence of an incorporeal space and that being a container is an essential property of place.
  • 20 - The nature of change
    pp 279-290
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762168.022
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The central place that motion occupied in medieval thought can be understood only in the context of Aristotelian natural philosophy, particularly as it was set out in Book III of Aristotle's Physics and developed by medieval thinkers. This chapter focuses on what one might call the "ontological" aspects of motion. The Physics was only one of Aristotle's works on natural philosophy, but from the medieval perspective it was the most important one. In contrast to human-made objects, a natural object's specific nature disposes it to certain kinds of behavior, most notably to all kinds of natural change. In an influential passage in Book III of the Physics, Aristotle maintains that motion does not constitute a separate category of its own over and above the things that are moving, but is placed in several categories of entities that are capable of change: Substance, Quantity, Quality, and Place.
  • 21 - Soul and body
    pp 291-304
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762168.023
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Most religions and pre-modern philosophies advance some idea of the soul. The principal philosophical sources of medieval speculation about the existence, nature, and possible immortality of the soul derive from the works of Plato and Aristotle. In the Meno and the Phaedo, Plato explores the idea of the soul as an immaterial substance that animates a body, but that is itself an independently existing intellectual subject. Syrian Christians, began to translate Aristotle's Greek into Syriac in the fourth century, and these texts remained in Byzantine hands until the Islamic conquests of the seventh and eighth centuries. This chapter describes five thinkers whose views proved particularly influential: the Dominicans Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas, and the Franciscans Bonaventure, John Duns Scotus, and William of Ockham. Almost more interesting than Ockham's views on the relation of body and soul are his anticipations of difficulties that would come to loom ever larger in subsequent scholastic and post-scholastic thought.
  • 22 - The soul’s faculties
    pp 305-319
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762168.024
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Most medieval thinkers assume that the human soul has several faculties or powers: basic faculties such as digestion or growth, more elaborate faculties such as movement, vision, or imagination, and the characteristically human faculties of will and intellect. Avicenna is the single most influential source for medieval faculty theory, in both the Arabic and the Latin world. This chapter present his system of faculties, before turning to disputed issues. In later medieval faculty theory, several attempts were made to reconcile Aristotle's theory of touch with later theories. One solution was to save Aristotle's view that the organ lies close to the heart by distinguishing between a primary organ of touch, the heart, and a secondary organ, the nerve. Plato had maintained that all odor is vapor or mist, which most likely is the position Aristotle was targeting when he refuted the theory that odor is smoky evaporation.
  • 23 - The nature of intellect
    pp 320-333
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762168.025
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The views of medieval philosophers on the nature of the intellect were framed around the interpretation of Book III of Aristotle's De anima. Aristotle's method for determining the nature of the intellect and other psychological faculties is to analyze the operations for which the faculty is responsible. In the later Christian tradition the agent intellect was generally viewed as a faculty within the individual human soul. The Islamic philosophical tradition accepted the basic framework of Aristotle's agent and material intellects. But Islamic philosophers recognized that in many of the Greek commentaries on the De anima, the term 'intellect' was often applied to the various developmental stages in the material or potential intellect's acquisition of knowledge. Jewish philosophers after the twelfth century were most influenced by Averroes's earlier reading of the De anima. The most detailed account of the nature of the intellect among later Jewish philosophers is found in Levi ben Gershom's magnum opus, the Wars of the Lord.
  • 24 - Perception
    pp 334-345
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762168.026
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Early Latin accounts of classical Greek theories of perception were channeled through such encyclopedic thinkers as Pliny, Macrobius, and Martianus Capella, as well as Augustine and Boethius. Perhaps the most important among these channeling agents was Calcidius. In contrast to the Greco-Latin tradition, the Greco-Arabic stream was primarily Aristotelian in emphasis, with particular attention paid to the De anima and De sensu et sensato. The Arabic tradition also accommodated Aristotle's account of sense perception to Galenic anatomy and physiology by abandoning the perceptual role Aristotle had given to the heart, and identifying the brain as the main locus for the perceptual process. By the second half of the thirteenth century, the internal-sense model of faculty psychology had taken firm root within the scholastic community that it became the canonical framework for the analysis of perception. Several features made the species theory of perception compelling to high medieval scholastic thinkers.

Page 1 of 2


This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.


Peter Adamson , Al-Kindī (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)

Adam Becker , Fear of God and the Beginning of Wisdom: The School of Nisibis and Christian Scholastic Culture in Late Antique Mesopotamia (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006).

Dimitri Gutas , Greek Thought, Arabic Culture (London: Routledge, 1998).

Dimitri Gutas , “Paul the Persian on the Classification of the Parts of Aristotle’s Philosophy: A Milestone between Alexandria and Baġdād,” Der Islam 60 (1983).

Dimitri Gutas , “Plato’s Symposion in the Arabic Tradition,” Oriens 31 (1988)

John F. Haldon , Byzantium in the Seventh Century: The Transformation of a Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).

Mossman Roueché , “Did Medical Students Study Philosophy in Alexandria?Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 43 (1999).

Gérard Troupeau , “La logique d’Ibn al-Muqaffaʿ et les origins de la grammaire arabe,” Arabica 28 (1981)

Edward Watts , “Justinian, Malalas, and the End of Athenian Philosophical Teaching in A.D. 529,” Journal of Roman Studies 94 (2004).

J. Brower and K. Guilfoy (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Abelard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).

Margaret Cameron , “Boethius on Utterances, Understanding, and Reality” in J. Marenbon (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Boethius (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).

J. Hamesse and O. Weijers (eds.) Écriture et réécriture des textes philosophiques médiévaux (Turnhout: Brepols, 2006).

C. J. Mews et al. (eds.) Rhetoric and Renewal in the Latin West 1100–1540: Essays in Honour of John O. Ward (Leiden; Brill, 2003).

Philipp Rosemann , Peter Lombard, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).

Katerina Ierodiakonou , “Metaphysics in the Byzantine Tradition: Eustratios of Nicaea on Universals,” Quaestio 5 (2005).

Georgi Kapriev , “The Modern Study of Byzantine Philosophy,” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 48 (2006).

A. C. Lloyd , “Neoplatonic Logic and Aristotelian Logic,” Phronesis 1 (1955–6).

Michele Trizio , “Byzantine Philosophy as a Contemporary Historiographical Project,” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 74 (2007).

Bernard G. Dod , “Aristoteles Latinus,” in N. Kretzmann et al. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).

Jacques Fontaine , “Education and Learning,” in P. Fouracre (ed.) The New Cambridge Medieval History, vol. I: c.500–c.700 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).

Alessandro Palazzo , “Ulrich of Strasbourg and Denys the Carthusian,” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 46 (2004).

Jan Aertsen , “Ontology and Henology in Medieval Philosophy (Thomas Aquinas, Master Eckhart and Berthold of Moosburg),” in E. Bos and P. Meyer (eds.) On Proclus and his Influence in Medieval Philosophy (Leiden: Brill, 1992).

Tulio Gregory , “The Platonic Inheritance,” in P. Dronke (ed.) A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).

Dag Hasse , “Plato arabico-latinus: Philosophy – Wisdom Literature – Occult Sciences,” in S. Gersh and M. J. F. M. Hoenen (eds.) The Platonic Tradition in the Middle Ages: A Doxographic Approach (Berlin: De Gruyter2002).

Robert Henle , Saint Thomas and Platonism: A Study of Plato and Platonici Texts in the Writings of Saint Thomas (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1956).

Deborah L. Black , “Avicenna on Self-Awareness and Knowing that One Knows,” in S. Rahman (ed.) Arabic Logic, Epistemology and Metaphysics, (Dordrecht: Springer, 2008).

Bonnie Kent , “Augustine’s Ethics,” in N. Kretzmann and E. Stump (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Augustine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).

William Mann , “Divine Simplicity,” Religious Studies 18 (1982).

William Mann , “Ethics,” in J. Brower and K. Guilfoy (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Abelard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).

Richard Sorabji , Self: Ancient and Modern Insights about, Individuality Life, and Death (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006).

Eleonore Stump and Norman Kretzmann , “Absolute Simplicity,” Faith and Philosophy 2 (1985).

William Courtenay , including “The Registers of the University of Paris and the Statutes Against the ‘Scientia Occamica’,Vivarium 29 (1991).

Jürgen Miethke , “Papst, Ortsbischof und Universität in den Pariser Theologenprozessen des 13. Jahrhunderts,” in A. Zimmermann (ed.) Die Auseinandersetzungen an der Pariser Universität im XIII. Jahrhundert (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1976).

Johannes M. M. H. Thijssen , Censure and Heresy at the University of Paris, 1200–1400 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1998).

Robert Wielockx , “Autour du procès de Thomas d’Aquin,” in A. Zimmermann (ed.) Thomas von Aquin: Werk und Wirkung im Licht neuerer Forschungen (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1988).

John P. Wippel , “Thomas Aquinas and the Condemnation of 1277,” The Modern Schoolman 72 (1995).

Stephen Menn , Descartes and Augustine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).

Christia Mercer , Leibniz’s Metaphysics: Its Origins and Development (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).

William Newman , Atoms and Alchemy: Chymistry and the Experimental Origins of the Scienific Revolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006).

Christopher J. Martin , “Logic,” in J. Brower and K. Guilfoy (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Abelard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).

Christopher J. Martin , “The Logic of Negation in Boethius, Phronesis 36 (1991).

Christopher J. Martin , “William’s Machine,” Journal of Philosophy 83 (1986).

Christopher Martin , “Obligations and Liars,” in M. Yrjönsuuri (ed.) Medieval Formal Logic: Consequences, Obligations, Insolubles (Dordrecht: Reidel, 2001).

E. J. Ashworth and Paul Spade , “Logic in Late Medieval Oxford,” in J. I. Catto and R. Evans (eds.) The History of the University of Oxford, vol. II: Late Medieval Oxford (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992).

Sten Ebbesen , “Early Supposition Theory (12th–13th Century),” Histoire Epistémologie Langage 3 (1981).

Norman Kretzmann , et al. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy: From the Rediscovery of Aristotle to the Disintegration of Scholasticism. 1100–1600 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).

Alain Libera , “Supposition naturelle et appellation: aspects de la sémantique parisienne au XIIIe siécle,” Histoire Epistémologie Langage 3 (1981).

John Malcolm , “A Reconsideration of the Identity and Inherence Theories of the Copula,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 17 (1979).

Claude Panaccio and Ernesto Perini-Santos , “Guillaume d’Ockham et la suppositio materialis,” Vivarium 42 (2004).

Stephen Read , “Thomas of Cleves and Collective Supposition,” Vivarium 29 (1991).

Paul Spade , “The Logic of the Categorical: The Medieval Theory of Descent and Ascent,” in N. Kretzmann (ed.) Meaning and Inference in Medieval Philosophy (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1988).

Gyula Klima , “Nominalism,” in E. K. Brown (ed.) Elsevier’s Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (Elsevier: Oxford, 2006).

Gyula Klima , “The Changing Role of Entia Rationis in Medieval Philosophy: A Comparative Study with a Reconstruction,” Synthese 96 (1993).

Gyula Klima , “Ockham’s Semantics and Ontology of the Categories,” in P. V. Spade (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Ockham (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).

Gyula Klima , “Existence and Reference in Medieval Logic,” in A. Hieke and E. Morscher (eds.) New Essays in Free Logic (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2001).

Gyula Klima , “Consequences of a Closed, Token-Based Semantics: The Case of John Buridan,” History and Philosophy of Logic 25 (2004).

Catarina Dutilh Novaes , “Buridan’s consequentia: Consequence and Inference within a Token-based Semantics,” History and Philosophy of Logic 26 (2005).

Stephen Read , “The Liar Paradox from John Buridan back to Thomas Bradwardine,” Vivarium 40 (2002).

Ivan Boh , “Consequences,” in N. Kretzmann et al., The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).

Christopher J. Martin , “Formal Consequence in Scotus and Ockham: Towards an Account of Scotus’ Logic,” in O. Boulnois et al. (eds.) Duns Scot à Paris 1302–2002 (Turnhout: Brepols, 2004).

Calvin Normore , “The Necessity in Deduction: Cartesian Inference and its Medieval Background,” Synthese 96 (1993).

Mikko Yrjönsuuri , “Duties, Rules and Interpretations in Obligational Disputations,” in Yrjönsuuri , Medieval Formal Logic (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2001).

Tyler Burge , “Buridan and Epistemic Paradox,” Philosophical Studies 34 (1978).

Norman Kretzmann , “Socrates Is Whiter than Plato Begins to be White,” Noûs 11 (1977).

P. V. Spade , “Ockham, Adams and Connotation: A Critical Notice of Marilyn Adams, William Ockham,” Philosophical Review 99 (1990).

Edith Sylla , “William Heytesbury on the Sophism ‘Infinita sunt finita’,” in J. P. Beckmann and W. Kluxen (eds.) Sprache und Erkenntnis im Mittelalter (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1981).

James Weisheipl , “Curriculum of the Faculty of Arts at Oxford in the Early Fourteenth Century,” Mediaeval Studies 26 (1964).

G. L. Bursill-Hall , Speculative Grammars of the Middle Ages: The Doctrine of partes orationis of the Modistae (The Hague: Mouton, 1971).

Michael Covington , Syntactic Theory in the High Middle Ages: Modistic Models of Sentence Structure (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).

Paul Edward Dutton and Anneli Luhtala , “Eriugena in Priscianum,” Mediaeval Studies 56 (1994).

Ebbesen , “The Dead Man is Alive,” Synthese 40 (1979).

K. M. Fredborg , “Speculative Grammar,” in P. Dronke (ed.) A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).

K. M. Fredborg , “The Priscian Commentary from the Second Half of the Twelfth Century: Ms Leiden BPL 154,” Histoire Epistémologie Langage 12 (1990).

K. M. Fredborg , “Universal Grammar According to some Twelfth c. Grammarians,” Historiographia Linguistica 7 (1980).

Anne Grondeux and Elsa Marguin , “L’œuvre grammaticale de Jean de Garlande (ca. 1195–1272?), auteur, réviseur et glosateur: Un bilan,” Histoire Epistémologie Langage 21 (1999).

Anne Grondeux , “Prologue, prohemium, glose du prohemium dans les manuscrits du Graecismus d’Evrard de Béthune,” Les prologues médiévaux (Brepols: Turnhout, 2000).

R. W. Hunt , “Absoluta: The Summa of Petrus Hispanus on Priscianus minor,” Historiographia Linguistica 2 (1975).

Klaus Jacobi , “Peter Abelard’s Investigations into the Meaning and Function of the Speech Sign ‘Est’,” in S. Knuutila and J. Hintikka (eds.) The Logic of Being (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1986).

Louis G. Kelly , The Mirror of Grammar: Theology, Philosophy, and the Modistae (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2002).

C. H. Kneepkens , “Master Guido and his View on Government: On Twelfth-Century Linguistic Thought,” Vivarium 16 (1978).

C. H. Kneepkens , “The Relatio simplex in the Grammatical Tracts of the Late Twelfth and Early Thirteenth Century,” Vivarium 15 (1977).

C. H. Kneepkens , “Grammar and Semantics in the Twelfth Century: Petrus Helias and Gilbert de la Porrée on the Substantive Verb,” in M. Kardaun and J. Spruyt (eds.) The Winged Chariot: Collected Essays on Plato and Platonism in Honour of L. M. de Rijk (Leiden: Brill, 2000).

C. H. Kneepkens , “Erfurt, Ampl. Q.70A: A Quaestiones-Commentary on the Second Part of Alexander de Villa Dei’s Doctrinale by Marsilius of Inghen? An Explorative Note on a Specimen of Conceptualist Grammar,” Vivarium 28 (1990).

Roberto Lambertini , “Sicut tabernarius vinum significat per circulum: Directions in Contemporary Interpretations of the Modistae,” in U. Eco and C. Marmo (eds.) On the Medieval Theories of Signs (Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1989).

Vivien Law , (ed.) History of Linguistic Thought: The History of Linguistics in Europe, from Plato to 1600 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).

John Marenbon , From the Circle of Alcuin to the School of Auxerre: Logic, Theology and Philosophy in the Early Middle Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).

John Marenbon , Boethius (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).

Constant Mews , “Logica in the Service of Philosophy: William of Champeaux and his Influence,” in R. Berndt (ed.) Schrift, Schreiber, Schenker: Studien zur Abtei Sankt Viktor zu Paris und zu den Viktorinern (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2005).

Constant Mews , “Nominalism and Theology before Abaelard: New Light on Roscelin of Compiègne,” Vivarium 30 (1992).

J. Pinborg , “Speculative Grammar,” in N. Kretzmann et al. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).

Irène Rosier-Catach , “Abélard et les grammairiens: sur la définition du verbe et la notion d’inhérence,” in P. Lardet (ed.) La tradition vive: mélanges d’histoire des textes en l’honneur de Louis Holtz (Turnhout: Brepols, 2003).

Irène Rosier-Catach , “Abélard et les grammairiens: sur le verbe substantif et la prédication,” Vivarium 41 (2003).

Irène Rosier-Catach , “Priscien, Boèce, les Glosulae in Priscianum, Abélard: les enjeux des discussions autour de la notion de consignification,” Histoire Epistémologie Langage 25 (2003).

Mary Sirridge , “Robert Kilwardby: Figurative Constructions and the Limits of Grammar,” in G. L. Bursill-Hall (ed.) De ortu grammaticae (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1990).

Peter Dronke , “Thierry of Chartres,” in Dronke (ed.) A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).

M. W. Herren , et al. (eds.) “Invention and Reform in Latin Planetary Astronomy,” in Latin Culture in the Eleventh Century. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Medieval Latin Studies (Turnhout: Brepols, 2002).

Matthias Baltes , Die Weltentstehung des platonischen Timaios nach den Antiken interpreten (Leiden: Brill, 1976–8).

Richard Frank , “The Ashʿarite Ontology I: Primary Entities,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 9 (1999).

John Laumakis , “Aquinas’ Misinterpretation of Avicebron on the Activity of Corporeal Substances: Fons Vitae II, 9 and 10,” Modern Schoolman 81 (2004).

Gerhard May , Schöpfung aus dem Nichts: Die Entstehung der Lehre von der Creatio ex nihilo (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1978).

Lawrence Moonan , Divine Power: The Medieval Power Distinction up to its Adoption by Albert, Bonaventure, and Aquinas (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).

Eric Ormsby , Theodicy in Islamic Thought: The Dispute over al-Ghazālī’s “Best of All Possible Worlds” (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984).

Reva Pourjavady and Sabine Schmidtke , A Jewish Philosopher of Baghdad (Leiden: Brill, 2006).

Silvia Donati , “The Anonymous Commentary on the Physics in Erfurt,” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 72 (2005).

Jon McGinnis , “Positioning Heaven: The Infidelity of a Faithful Aristotelian,” Phronesis 51 (2006).

Paul Needham , “Duhem’s Theory of Mixture in the Light of the Stoic Challenge to the Aristotelian Conception,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33 (2002).

Pines , “Les précurseurs musulmans de la theorie de l’impetus,” Archeion 21 (1938).

Chris Schabel , ed. “Francis of Marchia’s Virtus derelicta and the Context of its Development,” Vivarium 44 (2006).

Rega Wood , and Michael Weisberg , “Interpreting Aristotle on Mixture: Problems about Elemental Composition from Philoponus to Cooper,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 35 (2004).

Fabio Zanin , “Francis of Marchia, Virtus derelicta, and Modifications of the Basic Principles of Aristotelian Physics,” Vivarium 44 (2006).

Cecilia Trifogli , “Thomas Wylton on Motion,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 77 (1995).

Stefano Caroti , “Oresme on Motion (Questiones super Physicam III, 2–7),” Vivarium 31 (1993).

Peter Damerow , et al. (eds.) Exploring the Limits of Preclassical Mechanics (Dordrecht: Springer, 1992).

Edward Grant , The Foundations of Modern Science in the Middle Ages. Their Religious, Institutional and Intellectual Contexts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).

L. A. Kosman , “Aristotle’s Definition of Motion,” Phronesis 14 (1969).

Helen Lang , The Order of Nature in Aristotle’s Physics: Place and the Elements (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).

John North , “Natural Philosophy in Late Medieval Oxford,” in J. Catto and R. Evans (eds.) The History of the University of Oxford, vol. II: Late Medieval Oxford (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992).

Edith Sylla , The Oxford Calculators, in N. Kretzmann et al. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).

J. M. M. H. Thijssen , “The Buridan School Reassessed. John Buridan and Albert of Saxony,” Vivarium 42 (2004).

C. F. J. Martin , “On a Mistake CommonlyMade in Accounts of Sixteenth-Century Discussions of the Immortality of the Soul,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 69 (1995).

Robert Pasnau , “Aquinas and the Content Fallacy,” Modern Schoolman 75 (1998).

Deborah L. Black , “Estimation (Wahm) in Avicenna: The Logical and Psychological Dimensions,” Dialogue 32 (1993).

D. N. Hasse , “Pietro d’Abano’s ‘Conciliator’ and the Theory of the Soul in Paris,” in J. Aertsen et al. (eds.) Nach der Verurteilung von 1277 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2001).

Mark Jordan , “The Disappearance of Galen in Thirteenth-Century Philosophy and Theology,” in A. Zimmermann et al. (eds.) Mensch und Natur im Mittelalter (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1992).

Dominik Perler , “Intentionality and Action: Medieval Discussions on the Cognitive Capacities of Animals,” in M. Pacheco and J. Meirinhos (eds.) Intellect et imagination dans la philosophie médiévale (Turnhout: Brepols, 2006).

Harry A. Wolfson , “The Internal Senses in Latin, Arabic and Hebrew Philosophical Texts,” Harvard Theological Review 28 (1935).

Herbert Davidson , “The Relation between Averroes’ Middle and Long Commentaries on the De Anima,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 7 (1997).

Thérèse-Anne Druart , “The Human Soul’s Individuation and its Survival after the Body’s Death: Avicenna on the Causal Relation between Body and Soul,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 10 (2000).

John Marenbon , Later Medieval Philosophy (1150–1350): An Introduction (London: Routledge, 1987).

Wolfson , “Plan for the Publication of a Corpus commentariorum Averrois in Aristotele,” Speculum 6 (1931).

Wolfson , “Revised Plan for the Publication of a Corpus commentariorum Averrois in Aristotelem.” Speculum 38 (1963).

Dallas Denery , Seeing and Being Seen in the Later Medieval World: Optics, Theology and Religious Life (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).

Robert Pasnau , “Sensible Qualities: The Case of Sound,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 38 (2000).

A. Mark Smith , “The Alhacenian Account of Spatial Perception and its Epistemological Implications,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 15 (2005).

E. J. Ashworth , Language and Logic in the Post-Medieval Period (Boston: Reidel, 1974).

Claude Panaccio , “From Mental Word to Mental Language,” Philosophical Topics 20 (1992).

Claude Panaccio , “Semantics and Mental Language,” in P. V. Spade (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Ockham (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).

R. Pasnau , Cambridge Translations of Medieval Philosophical Texts, vol. III (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).

Dominik Perler , “Essentialism and Direct Realism: Some Late Medieval Perspectives,” Topoi 19 (2000).

Muhammad Ali Khalidi , Medieval Islamic Philosophical Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).

Peter King , “Jean Buridan’s Philosophy of Science,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 18 (1987).

Jon McGinnis , “Scientific Methodologies in Medieval Islam,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (2003).

E. A. Moody , “A Quodlibetal Question of Robert Holcot, O.P. on the Problem of the Objects of Knowledge and of Belief,” Speculum 39 (1964).

Philip Reynolds , “Properties, Causality, and Epistemic Optimism in Thomas Aquinas,” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévale 68 (2001).

Eileen Serene , “Demonstrative Science,” in N. Kretzmann et al. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).

Leonard Bowman , “The Development of the Doctrine of the Agent Intellect in the Franciscan School of the Thirteenth Century,” Modern Schoolman 50 (1973).

Christopher M. Cullen , Bonaventure (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).

R. E. Houser , “Philosophical Development through Metaphor: Light among the Greeks,” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 64 (1990).

Steven Marrone , William of Auvergne and Robert Grosseteste: New Ideas of Truth in the Early Thirteenth Century (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983).

T. Rudavsky (ed.) Divine Omniscience and Omnipotence in Medieval Philosophy (Boston: Reidel, 1985).

Charles Schmitt , Cicero Scepticus. A Study of the Influence of the Academica in the Renaissance (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1972).

Peter Adamson , “Abū Maʿshar, al-Kindī and the Philosophical Defense of Astrology,” Recherches de philosophie et théologie médiévales 69 (2002).

David Burrell , Faith and Freedom: An Interfaith Perspective (Oxford: Blackwell, 2004).

William Lane Craig , The Problem of Divine Foreknowledge and Future Contingents from Aristotle to Suarez (Leiden: Brill, 1988).

Anthony Kenny , “Divine Foreknowledge and Human Freedom,” in A. Kenny (ed.) Aquinas: A Collection of Critical Essays (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1969).

Calvin Normore , “Picking and Choosing: Anselm and Ockham on Choice,” Vivarium 36 (1998).

Stephen D. Dumont , “The Origin of Scotus’s Theory of Synchronic Contingency,” Modern Schoolman 72 (1995).

Peter S. Eardley , “The Foundations of Freedom in Later Medieval Philosophy: Giles of Rome and his Contemporaries,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2006).

Peter S. Eardley , “The Problem of Moral Weakness, the Propositio Magistralis, and the Condemnation of 1277,” Mediaeval Studies 68 (2006).

David M. Gallagher , “Free Choice and Free Judgment in Thomas Aquinas,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 76 (1994).

Tobias Hoffmann , “Aquinas and Intellectual Determinism: The Test Case of Angelic Sin,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 89 (2007).

Christopher J. Ryan , “Man’s Free Will in the Works of Siger of Brabant,” Mediaeval Studies 45 (1983).

Deborah L. Black , “Imagination and Estimation: Arabic Paradigms and Western Transformations,” Topoi 19 (2000).

Olivier Boulnois , “Duns Scot: existe-t-il des passions de la volonté?” in B. Besnier et al. (eds.) Les passions antiques et médiévales: théories et critiques des passions (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2003).

Thomas Dixon , From Passions to Emotions: The Creation of a Secular Psychological Category [Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003]).

Vesa Hirvonen , Passions in William Ockham’s Philosophical Psychology (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2004).

Peter King , “Late Scholastic Theories of the Passions: Controversies in the Thomist Tradition,” in H. Lagerlund and M. Yrjönsuuri (eds.) Emotions and Choice from Boethius to Descartes (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2002).

Simo Knuuttila , Emotions in Ancient and Medieval Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004).

Jill Kraye , “Moral Philosophy,” in C. B. Schmitt and Q. Skinner (eds.) The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).

A. A. Long and D. N. Sedley , The Hellenistic Philosophers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).

E. Maccagnolo , “David of Dinant and the Beginning of Aristotelianism in Paris,” in P. Dronke (ed.) A History of Twelfth-Century Western Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).

Claudia Eisen Murphy , “Aquinas on our Responsibility for our Emotions,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 8 (1999).

Letizia Panizza , “Stoic Psychotherapy in theMiddle Ages and Renaissance: Petrarch’s De remediis,” in M. J. Osler (ed.) Atoms, Pneuma, and Tranquility: Epicurean and Stoic Themes in European Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).

Juha Sihvola and Troels Engberg-Pedersen (eds.) The Emotions in Hellenistic Philosophy (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1998).

Bernard Besnier et al. (eds.) Les passions antiques et médiévales (Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 2003).

Bonnie Kent , “Evil in Later Medieval Philosophy,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (2007).

Bonnie Kent , “Aquinas and Weakness of Will,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2007).

Henrik Lagerlund and Mikko Yrjönsuuri (eds.) Emotions and Choice from Boethius to Descartes (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2002).

Alister McGrath , Iustitia Dei: A History of the Christian Doctrine of Justification, 3rd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).

E. R. Dodds , Pagan and Christian in an Age of Anxiety (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965).

Philip Merlan , Monopsychism, Mysticism, and Metaconsciousness (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1963).

Henry Chadwick , “Origen, Celsus, and the Resurrection of the Body,” Harvard Theological Review 41 (1948).

M. S. Kempshall , The Common Good in Late Medieval Political Thought (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999).

Michael Marmura , “Avicenna’s ‘Flying Man’ in Context,” The Monist 69 (1986).

Terence Irwin , “Stoic Naturalism and its Critics,” in B. Inwood (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Stoicism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).

Sandra Visser and Thomas Williams , “Anselm’s Account of Freedom,” in B. Davies and B. Leftow (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Anselm (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).

Jeffery Hause , “Aquinas on the Function of Moral Virtue,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (2007).

George Hourani , Reason and Tradition in Islamic Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985).

Thomas Hurka , “Virtuous Act, Virtuous Dispositions,” Analysis 66 (2006).

Sigrid Müller , “The Ethics of John Capreolus and the Nominales,” Verbum: Analecta Neolatina 6 (2004).

John Marenbon , The Philosophy of Peter Abelard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).

Joseph Pilsner , The Specification of Human Actions in St. Thomas Aquinas (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).

Rudolph Arbesmann , “The Concept of ‘Christus medicus’ in St. Augustine,” Traditio 10 (1954).

István Bejczy and Richard Newhauser (eds.) Virtue and Ethics in the Twelfth Century (Leiden: Brill, 2005).

John Bossy , “Moral Arithmetic: Seven Sins into Ten Commandments,” in E. Leites (ed.) Conscience and Casuistry in Early Modern Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).

D. Catherine Brown , Pastor and Laity in the Theology of Jean Gerson (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).

James A. Brundage , Law, Sex, and Christian Society in Medieval Europe (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987).

D. L. d’Avray , Medieval Marriage: Symbolism and Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).

G. R. Evans , Alan of Lille: The Frontiers of Theology in the Later Twelfth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).

G. R. Evans , The Language and Logic of the Bible: The Earlier Middle Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).

Joseph Goering , “The Internal Forum and the Literature of Penance and Confession,” Traditio 59 (2004).

Odd Langholm : The Legacy of Scholasticism in Economic Thought: Antecedents of Choice and Power (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).

Loman McAodha , “The Nature and Efficacy of Preaching According to St. Bernandine of Siena,” Franciscan Studies 27 (1967).

John T. McNeill , “Medicine for Sin as Prescribed in the Penitentials,” Church History 1 (1932).

Alexander Murray , “Confession before 1215,” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 6th series, 3 (1993).

Newhauser , The Early History of Greed: The Sin of Avarice in Early Medieval Thought and Literature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).

Newhauser (ed.) The Seven Deadly Sins: From Communities to Individuals (Leiden: Brill, 2007).

Philip L. Reynolds , Marriage in the Western Church: The Christianization of Marriage during the Patristic and Early Medieval Periods (Leiden: Brill, 1994).

Rosamond Tuve , “Notes on Virtues and Vices,” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 26 (1963).

Siegfried Wenzel , “The Seven Deadly Sins: Some Problems of Research,” Speculum 43 (1968).

Anders Winroth , The Making of Gratian’s Decretum (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 2303 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 2278 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.