References
Achinstein, P. (2001). The Book of Evidence. New York: Oxford University Press.
Aristotle. (1999). Metaphysics, Sachs, J. (trans.). New Mexico: Green Lion Press.
Armstrong, D. M. (1983). What Is a Law of Nature? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Ball, P. (2021). The Elements: A Visual History of Their Discovery. Chicago: The University Chicago Press.
Bartol, J. (2016). Biochemical kinds. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 67, 531–51.
Bartoš, H., & King, C. (eds.). (2020). Heat, Pneuma, and Soul in Ancient Philosophy and Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bird, A. (2018). The metaphysics of natural kinds. Synthese, 195(4), 1397–426.
Blumenthal, G., & Ladyman, J. (2017). The development of problems within the phlogiston theories, 1766–1791. Foundations of Chemistry, 19(3), 241–80.
Blumenthal, G., & Ladyman, J. (2018). Theory comparison and choice in chemistry, 1766–1791. Foundations of Chemistry, 20, 169–89.
Boyle, R. (2003). The Sceptical Chemist: The Classic 1661 Text. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, Inc..
Brading, K. (2010). Autonomous patterns and scientific realism. Philosophy of Science, 77(5), 827–39.
Brandon, R. N. (1997). Does biology have laws? The experimental evidence. Philosophy of Science, 2, 444–57.
Brock, W. (2012). The Fontana History of Chemistry. London: HarperCollins UK.
Brown, R. G., & Ladyman, J. (2019). Materialism: A Historical and Philosophical Inquiry. London: Routledge.
Bursten, J. R. (2014). Microstructure without essentialism: A new perspective on chemical classification. Philosophy of Science, 81(4), 633–53.
Bursten, J. R. (2016). Smaller than a Breadbox: Scale and natural kinds. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 69(1), 1–23.
Carnap, R. (1928/1967). The Logical Structure of the World and Pseudoproblems in Philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cartwright, N. (1983). How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chakravartty, A. (2007). A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism: Knowing the Unobservable. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Chalmers, A. (2011). Drawing philosophical lessons from Perrin’s experiments on Brownian motion: A response to van Fraassen. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 62, 711–32.
Chang, H. (2012a). Acidity: The persistence of the everyday in the scientific. Philosophy of Science, 79(5), 690–700.
Chang, H. (2012b). Is Water H2O? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism (Vol. 293). Springer Dordrecht: Science & Business Media.
Chang, H. (2015a). Reductionism and the relation between chemistry and physics. In Arabatzis, T., Renn, J., & Simões, A. (ed.), Relocating the History of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science (Vol. 312) (pp. 193–209). Dordrecht: Springer.
Chang, H. (2015b). The rising of chemical natural kinds through epistemic iteration. In Kendig, Catherine (ed.), Natural Kinds and Classification in Scientific Practice (pp. 33–46). London: Routledge.
Chang, H. (2016). Pragmatic realism. Journal of Humanities of Valparaiso, (8), 107–22.
Cláudio, M. N., Roque, J. P. L., Doddipatla, S., et al. (2022). Simultaneous tunneling control in conformer-specific reactions. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 144(45), 20866–74. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c09026. Davidson, D. (2002). Mental events. In Moser, Paul K., & Trout, J. D. (eds.), Contemporary Materialism (pp. 122–37). London: Routledge.
Dennett, D. C. (1991). Real patterns. The Journal of Philosophy, 88(1), 27–51.
Dirac, P. (1929). The quantum mechanics of many-electron systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character, 123(792), 714–33.
Dretske, F. (1977). Referring to events. In French, P., Uehling, T. Jr. & Wettstein, H. (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy II (pp. 90–9). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Duhem, P. ([1914] 1991). The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory (Vol. 13). New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Dupré, J. (1993). The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Earman, J., & Roberts, J. (1999). Ceteris paribus, there is no problem of provisos. Synthese, 118, 439–78.
Ellis, B. (2001). Scientific Essentialism. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, B. (2002). The Philosophy of Nature: A Guide to the New Essentialism. London: Routledge.
Fine, K. (1994). Essence and modality. In Tomberlin, J. E. (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives 8: Logic and Language (pp. 1–16). Atascadero: Ridgeview.
Fodor, J. A. (1980). Special Sciences, or the Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis. In Ned, B. (ed.), Readings in Philosophy of Psychology, Volume I (pp. 120–33). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fodor, J. A. (1985). Fodor’s guide to mental representation: The intelligent auntie’s vade-mecum. Mind, 94(373), 76–100.
Fodor, J. A. (1989). Making mind matter more. Philosophical Topics, 17, 59–79.
Franklin, A., & Seifert, V. A. (2020). The problem of molecular structure just is the measurement problem. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1086/715148. Franklin-Hall, L. R. (2015). Natural kinds as categorical bottlenecks. Philosophical Studies, 172, 925–48.
French, S. (2014). The Structure of the World: Metaphysics and Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Friend, T. (2019). Can parts cause their wholes? Synthese, 196, 5061–82.
Frigg, R., & Votsis, I. (2011). Everything you always wanted to know about structural realism but were afraid to ask. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 1, 227–76.
Gavroglu, K., & Simões, A. (2011). Neither Physics nor Chemistry: A History of Quantum Chemistry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Goodwin, W. (2011). Structure, function, and protein taxonomy. Biology & Philosophy, 26(4), 533–45.
Goodwin, W. (2012). Mechanisms and chemical reactions. In Hendry, R., Needham, P. & Woody, A. (eds.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 6: Philosophy of Chemistry (pp. 301–27). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Häggqvist, S. (2022). No, water (still) doesn’t have a microstructural essence (reply to Hoefer & Martí). European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 12(2), 1–13.
Harré, R. (2005). Chemical kinds and essences revisited. Foundations of Chemistry, 7(1), 7–30.
Havstad, J. C. (2018). Messy chemical kinds. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 69(3), 719–43.
Hawley, K., & Bird, A. (2011). What are natural kinds? Philosophical Perspectives, 25, 205–21.
Heitler, W., & London, F. (1927). Wechselwirkung neutraler Atome und homöopolare Bindung nach der Quantenmechanik. Zeitschrift für Physik, 44(6), 455–72.
Hempel, C. (1966). Philosophy of Natural Science. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Hendry, R. F. (2004). The physicists, the chemists, and the pragmatics of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 71(5), 1048–59.
Hendry, R. F. (2005). Lavoisier and Mendeleev on the elements. Foundations of Chemistry, 7(1), 31–48.
Hendry, R. F. (2006a). Elements, compounds, and other chemical kinds. Philosophy of Science, 73(5), 864–75.
Hendry, R. F. (2006b). Substantial confusion. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 37(2), 322–36.
Hendry, R. F. (2008). Two conceptions of the chemical bond. Philosophy of Science, 75(5), 909–20.
Hendry, R. F. (2010). Ontological reduction and molecular structure. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B, 41(2), 183–91.
Hendry, R. F. (2012a). Chemical substances and the limits of pluralism. Foundations of Chemistry, 14(1), 55–68.
Hendry, R. F. (2012b). Reduction, emergence and physicalism. In Woody, A. & Hendry, R. (eds.), Philosophy of Chemistry (pp. 367–86). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Hendry, R. F. (2017). Prospects for strong emergence in chemistry. In Orilia, F., Paoletti, M. P. (eds.), Philosophical and Scientific Perspectives on Downward Causation (pp. 146–63). London: Routledge.
Hendry, R. F. (2018). Scientific realism and the history of chemistry. Spontaneous Generations: A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science, 9(1), 108–17.
Hettema, H. (2017). The Union of Chemistry and Physics. Cham: Springer International.
Hettema, H., & Kuipers, T. A. (1988). The periodic table: Its formalization, status, and relation to atomic theory. Erkenntnis, 28(3), 387–408.
Hoefer, C., & Martí, G. (2019). Water has a microstructural essence after all. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 9(1), 1–15.
Hofmann, J. R. (1990). How the models of chemistry vie. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1990(1), 405–19.
Hudson, R. (2020). The reality of Jean Perrin’s atoms and molecules. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 71(1), 33–58.
Hull, D. L. (1978). A matter of individuality. Philosophy of Science, 45(3), 335–60.
Keeler, J., & Wothers, P. (2003). Why Chemical Reactions Happen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kemeny, J. G., & Oppenheim, P. (1956). On reduction. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 7(1/2), 6–19.
Khalidi, M. A. (1998). Natural kinds and crosscutting categories. Journal of Philosophy, 95(1), 33–50.
Kim, J. (1999). Making sense of emergence. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 95(1/2), 3–36.
Kim, J. (2007). Physicalism, or Something Near Enough. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kim, J. (2010). Why there are no laws in the special sciences: Three arguments. Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind, 282–310. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Kimpton-Nye, S. (2022). Laws of nature: Necessary and contingent. The Philosophical Quarterly, 72(4), 875–95.
Kincaid, H. (1997). Individualism and the Unity of Science: Essays on Reduction, Explanation, and the Special Sciences. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
Kitcher, P. (1993). The Advancement of Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kripke, S. A. (1972). Naming and necessity. In Davidson, D., & Harman, G. (eds), Semantics of Natural Language (pp. 253–355). Dordrecht: Springer.
Kumaki, J. (2016). Observation of polymer chain structures in two-dimensional films by atomic force microscopy. Polymer Journal, 48, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/pj.2015.67. Ladyman, J. (2011). Structural realism versus standard scientific realism: The case of phlogiston and dephlogisticated air. Synthese, 180(2), 87–101.
Ladyman, J. (2012). Understanding Philosophy of Science. London: Routledge.
Ladyman, J., Slater, M., & Yudell, Z. (2017). An apology for naturalized metaphysics. In Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science: New Essays (pp. 141–61). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ladyman, J., Ross, D., & Spurrett, D. with Collier, J. (2007). Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
LaPorte, J. (1996). Chemical kind term reference and the discovery of essence. Nous, 30(1), 112–32.
Laudan, L. (1981). A confutation of convergent realism. Philosophy of Science, 48(1), 19–49.
Laudan, L. (1984). Realism without the real. Philosophy of Science, 51(1), 156–62.
Le Poidevin, R. (2005). Missing elements and missing premises: A combinatorial argument for the ontological reduction of chemistry. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 56(1), 117–34.
Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lewis, D. (1986). On the Plurality of Worlds (Vol. 322). Oxford: Blackwell.
Lewis, G. N. ([1923] 1966). Valence and the Structure of Atoms and Molecules. New York: Dover, Chemical Catalogue.
Lipton, P. (1991). Inference to the Best Explanation. London: Routledge.
Locke, J. ([1689] 1975). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Nidditch, P. H. (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Lombardi, O., & Labarca, M. (2005). The ontological autonomy of the chemical world. Foundations of Chemistry, 7(2), 125–48.
Longy, F. (2018). Do we need two notions of natural kind to account for the history of ‘jade’? Synthese, 195(4), 1459–86.
Lowe, E. J. (1998). The Possibility of Metaphysics: Substance, Identity, and Time. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lowe, E. J. (2006). The Four-Category Ontology: A Metaphysical Foundation for Natural Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Macedo, K. G., & Haiduke, R. L. (2020). A quantum theory atoms in molecules study about the inductive effect of substituents in methane derivatives. ACS Omega, 5(15), 9041–5.
Magnus, P. D. (2018). Taxonomy, ontology, and natural kinds. Synthese, 195, 1427–39.
Mahan, B. H. (1975). University Chemistry. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Martins, R. D. (2019). Émile Meyerson and mass conservation in chemical reactions: A priori expectations versus experimental tests. Foundations of Chemistry, 21, 109–24.
Matta, C. F. (2013). Philosophical aspects and implications of the quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM). Foundations of Chemistry, 15, 245–51.
Maudlin, T. (1995). Three measurement problems. Topoi, 14(1), 7–15.
Mill, J. S. (1884). A System of Logic. London: Longman.
Mitchell, S. D. (2000). Dimensions of scientific law. Philosophy of Science, 67, 242–65.
Moretti, G. (2015). The ‘extent of reaction’: A powerful concept to study chemical transformations at the first-year general chemistry courses. Foundations of Chemistry, 17, 107–15.
Mumford, S., & Anjum, R. L. (2011). Getting Causes from Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nagel, E. (1979). The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation, 3rd ed. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Needham, P. (1991). Duhem and Cartwright on the truth of laws. Synthese, 89(1), 89–109.
Needham, P. (2000). What is water? Analysis, 60(1), 13–21.
Needham, P. (2004). When did atoms begin to do any explanatory work in chemistry? International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 18(2–3), 199–219.
Needham, P. (2010). Nagel’s analysis of reduction: Comments in defense as well as critique. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B, 41(2), 163–70.
Needham, P. (2011). Microessentialism: What is the argument? Noûs, 45(1), 1–21.
Newlands, J. A. (1884). On the Discovery of the Periodic Law: And on Relations among the Atomic Weights. London: E. & F. N. Spon.
Nye, M. J. (1972). Molecular Reality: A Perspective on the Scientific Work of Jean Perrin. London: Macdonald.
Oppenheim, P., & Putnam, H. (1958). Unity of science as a working hypothesis. In Feigl, H., Scriven, M. & Maxwell, G. (ed.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (Vol. 2) (pp. 3–36). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Ott, W. (2022). The Metaphysics of Laws of Nature: The Rules of the Game. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Papineau, D. (2002). Thinking about Consciousness. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Perrin, J. (1916). Atoms. New York: D. Van Nostrand.
Plato. (1952). Phaedrus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Psillos, S. (2005). Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. London: Routledge.
Psillos, S. (2011). Moving molecules above the scientific horizon: On Perrin’s case for realism. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 42, 339–63.
Psillos, S. (2014). Regularities, natural patterns and laws of nature. Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia, 29(1), 9–27.
Pullman, B. (2001). The Atom in the History of Human Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Putnam, H. (1975). Philosophical Papers: Mathematics, Matter, and Method (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Archive.
Quine, W. V. (1969). Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.
Ramsey, F. (1978). Foundations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Reichenbach, H. (1956). The Direction of Time. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Ross, D. (2000). Rainforest realism: A Dennettian theory of existence. In Ross, D., Brook, A., &Thompson, D. L. (eds.), Dennett’s Philosophy: A Comprehensive Assessment (pp. 147–68). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Roush, S. (2005). Tracking Truth: Knowledge, Evidence, and Science. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Ruby, J. E. (1986). The origins of scientific ‘Law’. Journal of the History of Ideas, 47(3), 341–59.
Ruse, M. (1982). Creation science is not science. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 7(3), 72–8.
Russell, B. (1912). On the notion of cause. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 13, 1–26.
Salmon, W. C. (1985). Empiricism: The Key Question. In Rescher, N. (ed.), Rescher, N. (ed.), The Heritage of Logical Positivism (pp. 1–22). Lanham: University Press of America.
Scerri, E. (1994). Has chemistry been at least approximately reduced to quantum mechanics? PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1994, 160–70.
Scerri, E. R. (1998). Popper’s naturalized approach to the reduction of chemistry. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 12(1), 33–44.
Scerri, E. R. (2012). A critique of Weisberg’s view on the periodic table and some speculations on the nature of classifications. Foundations of Chemistry, 14(3), 275–84.
Scerri, E. R. (2020). The periodic table and the turn to practice. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 79, 87–93.
Scerri, E. R., & Fisher, G. A. (eds.). (2016). Essays in the Philosophy of Chemistry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scerri, E. R., & Worrall, J. (2001). Prediction and the periodic table. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 32(3), 407–52.
Seifert, V. A. (2017). An alternative approach to unifying chemistry with quantum mechanics. Foundations of Chemistry, 19, 209–22.
Seifert, V. A. (2020). The strong emergence of molecular structure. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 10(3), 1–25.
Seifert, V. A. (2022a). Do molecules have structure in isolation? How models can provide the answer. In Lombardi, O., González, J. C. M., & Fortin, S. (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives in Quantum Chemistry (pp. 125–43). Cham: Springer.
Shapere, D. (1977). Scientific theories and their domains. In Suppe, F. (ed.), The Structure of Scientific Theories (pp. 518–99). Urbana: Illinois University Press.
Šima, J. (2013). Redox reactions: Inconsistencies in their description. Foundations of Chemistry, 15, 57–64.
Slater, M. H. (2009). Macromolecular pluralism. Philosophy of Science, 76(5), 851–63.
Song, X., Yin, K., Wang, Y., et al. (2019). Exotic hydrogen bonding in compressed ammonia hydrides. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 10(11), 2761–6.
Stanford, P. K. (2006). Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stanford, P. K. (2009). Scientific realism, the atomic theory, and the catch-all hypothesis: Can we test fundamental theories against all serious alternatives? The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 60(2), 253–69.
Tahko, T. E. (2015). Natural kind essentialism revisited. Mind, 124(495), 795–822.
Tahko, T. E. (2018). The epistemology of essence. In Carruth, A., Gibb, S. & Heil, J. (eds.), Ontology, Modality, and Mind: Themes from the Metaphysics of E. J. Lowe (93–110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tahko, T. E. (2020). Where do you get your protein? Or: Biochemical realization. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 71(3), 799–825.
Tahko, T. E. (2021). Unity of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tobin, E. (2010a). Crosscutting natural kinds and the hierarchy thesis. In Beebee, H. & Sabbarton-Leary, N. (eds.), The Semantics and Metaphysics of Natural Kinds (pp. 1–179). New York: Routledge.
Tobin, E. (2013). Are natural kinds and natural properties distinct? In Mumford, S. & Tugby, M. (eds.), Metaphysics and Science (pp. 164–82). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tooley, M. (1977). The nature of laws. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 7, 667–98.
Van Brakel, J. (1986). The chemistry of substances and the philosophy of mass terms. Synthese, 69(3), 291–324.
Van Brakel, J. (2000). Philosophy of Chemistry. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
van Fraassen, B. C. (1980). The Scientific Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van Fraassen, B. C. (1989). Laws and Symmetry. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Van Fraassen, B. C. (2009). The perils of Perrin, in the hands of philosophers. Philosophical Studies, 143(1), 5–24.
Villani, G. (2017). Chemical perspective in the study of living beings: A systemic complexity approach. Foundations of Chemistry, 19, 77–91.
Weininger, S. J. (2014). Reactivity and its Contexts. In Klein, U. & Reinhardt, C. (eds.), Objects of Chemical Inquiry (pp. 203–39). Leiden: Brill.
Weisberg, M. (2006). Water is not H2O. In Baird, D., Scerri, E., & McIntyre, L. (eds.), Philosophy of Chemistry (pp. 337–45). Dordrecht: Springer.
Weisberg, M. (2007). Who is a modeler? The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 58(2), 207–33.
Weisberg, M. (2008). Challenges to the structural conception of chemical bonding. Philosophy of Science, 75(5), 932–46.
Whewell, W. (1860). On the Philosophy of Discovery: Chapters Historical and Critical. London: J. W. Parker.
Wilson, J. (2016). Metaphysical emergence: Weak and strong. In Bigaj, T., & Wüthrich, C. (eds.), Metaphysics in Contemporary Physics, (24 November 2015), 251, 306–402. Leiden: Brill.
Woody, A. I. (2014). Chemistry’s periodic law: Rethinking representation and explanation after the turn to practice. In Soler, L., Zwart, S., Lynch, M. & Israel-Jost, V. (eds.), Science after the Practice Turn in Philosophy, History, and the Social Studies of Science (pp. 123–50). London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Woolley, R. G. (1976). Quantum theory and molecular structure. Advances in Physics, 25(1), 27–52.
Woolley, R. G., & Sutcliffe, B. T. (1977). Molecular structure and the born: Oppenheimer approximation. Chemical Physics Letters, 45(2), 393–8.
Zhao, L., Pan, S., Holzmann, N., Schwerdtfeger, P., & Frenking, G. (2019). Chemical bonding and bonding models of main-group compounds. Chemical Reviews, 119(14), 8781–845.
