Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
Constituting Europe
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 3
  • Cited by
    This book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Cliquennois, Gaëtan and Snacken, Sonja 2018. European and United Nations monitoring of penal and prison policies as a source of an inverted panopticon?. Crime, Law and Social Change, Vol. 70, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Baraggia, Antonia and Gennusa, Maria Elena 2017. Intertwined but Different. The Heterologous In Vitro Fertilization Case before the European Court of Human Rights and the Italian Constitutional Court. Perspectives on Federalism, Vol. 9, Issue. 1, p. 34.

    Murray, Colin R.G. and O'Donoghue, Aoife 2017. A path already travelled in domestic orders? From fragmentation to constitutionalisation in the global legal order. International Journal of Law in Context, Vol. 13, Issue. 03, p. 225.

    ×

Book description

At fifty, the European Court of Human Rights finds itself in a new institutional setting. With the EU joining the European Convention on Human Rights in the near future, and the Court increasingly having to address the responsibility of states in UN-led military operations, the Court faces important challenges at the national, European and international levels. In light of recent reform discussions, this volume addresses the multi-level relations of the Court by drawing on existing debates, pointing to current deficits and highlighting the need for further improvements.

Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Bibliography

Abi-Saab, G.The Security Council Legibus Solutus? On the Legislative Forays of the Council’, in L. Boisson de Chazournes and M.G. Kohen (eds.), International Law and the Quest for its Implementation: Liber Amicorum Vera Gowlland-Debbas (Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2010) 23–44
Ackerman, B.Constitutional Politics/Constitutional Law’, Yale Law Journal 99 (1989) 453–547
Ahmed, T.The European Union and Human Rights: An International Law Perspective’, European Journal of International Law 17:4 (2006) 771–801
Alexy, R.A Theory of Constitutional Rights (Oxford University Press, 2002)
Alexy, R.Balancing, Constitutional Review, and Representation’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 3 (2005) 572–581
Alexy, R.The Construction of Constitutional Rights’, Law and Ethics of Human Rights 4 (2010) 20–32
Alkema, E.A.The European Convention as a Constitution and its Court as a Constitutional Court’, in P. Mahoneyet al. (eds.), Protecting Human Rights: The European Perspective: Studies in Memory of Rolv Ryssdal (Cologne: Karl Heymanns Verlag, 2000) 41–63
Almquist. J.A.A Human Rights Critique of European Judicial Review: Counter-Terrorism Sanctions’, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 57 (2008) 303–31
Alvarez, J.A.International Organizations as Law-Makers (Oxford University Press, 2005)
Andenas, M.The Federal Russian Law on Foreign Treaties’, in R. Mullersohn (ed.), Constitutional Reform and International Law in Central and Eastern Europe (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1998), at 259–65
Andenas, M.“There is A World Elsewhere” – Lord Bingham and Comparative Law’, in M. Andenaset al. (eds.), Tom Bingham and the Transformation of the Law: A Liber Amicorum (Oxford University Press, 2009) 831–66
Andenas, M. and Bjorge, E.Juge national et interprétation évolutive de la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme’, Revue du droit public 4 (2011) 997–1014
Andenas, M. and Bjorge, E.Menneskerettene og oss (Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 2012)
Andenas, M. and Bjorge, E.Norske domstoler og utviklingen av menneskerettene’, Jussens Venner 46:5 (2011) 251–86
Andenas, M. and Kravik, A. M.Norske verdier og EMK’, Lov og Rett 49:10 (2010) 579–99
Arai-Takahashi, Y.Administrative Discretion in German Law: Doctrinal Discourse Revisited’, European Public Law 6:1 (2000) 69–80
Arai-Takahashi, Y.Disharmony in the Process of Harmonisation? – The Analytical Account of the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine as an Interpretive Device of the ECHR’, in C. Andersen and M. Andenas (eds.), Theory and Practice of Harmonisation (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers, 2012) 95–114
Arai-Takahashi, Y.The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2002)
Arden, M.Peaceful or Problematic? The Relationship between National Supreme Courts and Supranational Courts in Europe’, in P. Eeckhoutet al. (eds.), Yearbook of European Law 2010 (Oxford University Press, 2010) 3–20
Aust, H.P. and Naske, N.Rechtsschutz gegen den UN-Sicherheitsrat durch Europäische Gerichte?’, Austrian Journal of Public and International Law 61 (2006) 587–623
Badinter, R.Les épines et les roses (Paris: Fayard, 2011)
Barber, N. ‘The Commission on the Human Rights Act and the European Court of Human Rights’, UK Constitutional Law Group (27 September 2011)
Barkhuysen, T. and van Emmerik, M.Legitimacy of European Court of Human Rights Judgments: Procedural Aspects’, in N. Huls, M. Adams and J. Bornhoff (eds.), The Legitimacy of Highest Courts' Rulings (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2009) 437–49
Bates, E.The Birth of the European Convention of Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights’, in Christoffersen and Madsen (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights Between Law and Politics (Oxford University Press, 2012) 17–42, at 25–7
Bates, E.The Evolution of the European Convention on Human Rights: From its Inception to the Creation of a Permanent Court of Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2010) 436–72
Bell, J.et al. Principles of French Law, 2nd edn. (Oxford University Press, 2008)
Bentham, J. ‘A Fragment on Government’, F. C. Montague (ed.) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1891)
Bentham, J.Rationale of Judicial Evidence, Vol. II, Bk. III (London: Hunt and Clarke, 1827)
Benvenisti, E.Margin of Appreciation, Consensus, and Universal Standards’, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 31 (1998–9) 843–54
Bergmann, J.M.Diener dreier Herren?: Der Instanzrichter zwischen BVerfG, EuGH und EGMR’, Europarecht 41:1 (2006) 101–17
Bermann, G.A.Taking Subsidiarity Seriously: Federalism in the European Community and the United States’, Columbia Law Review 94 (1994) 332–456
Bernhardt, R.Human Rights and Judicial Review: The European Court of Human Rights’, in D.M. Beatty (ed.), Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Comparative Perspective (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1994) 297–319
Besselink, L.F.M.Entrapped by the Maximum Standard: On Fundamental Rights, Pluralism and Subsidiarity in the European Union’, Common Market Law Review 35 (1998) 629–80
Besselink, L.F.M.The European Union and The European Convention on Human Rights: From Sovereign Immunity in Bosphorus to Full Scrutiny under the Reform Treaty?’, in I. Boerefijn and J.E. Goldschmidt (eds.), Changing Perceptions of Sovereignty and Human Rights: Essays in Honour of Cees Flinterman (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2008) 295–309
Besson, S.European Human Rights, Supranational Judicial Review and Democracy – Thinking Outside the Judicial Box’, in P. Popelier, C. Van den Heyning and P. Van Nuffel (eds.), Human Rights Protection in the European Legal Order: Interaction, between European Courts and National Courts (Cambridge: Intersentia, 2011) 97–143
Bindman, C. ‘Deputy PM Nick Clegg Defends UK Human Rights Laws’ BBC News UK Politics (26 August 2011)
Bindman, G. ‘Britain should be proud of the Human Rights Act – and protect it’, The Guardian (29 August 2011)
Bingham, T.Lives of the Law: Selected Essays and Speeches 2000–2010 (Oxford University Press, 2011)
Bingham, T.Widening Horizons: The Influence of Comparative Law and International Law on Domestic Law (Cambridge University Press, 2010)
Bix, B.Law, Language, and Legal Determinacy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993)
Bix, B.Questions in Legal Interpretation’, in A. Marmor (ed.), Law and Interpretation: Essays in Legal Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995) 137–54
Bjorge, E.Exceptionalism and Internationalism in the Supreme Court: Horncastle and Cadder’, Public Law 3 (2011) 475–82
Bjorge, E.National Supreme Courts and the Development of ECHR Rights’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 9:1 (2011) 5–31
Bjorge, E.Torture and “Ticking Bomb” Scenarios’, Law Quarterly Review 127 (2011) 196–9
Blackburn, D. ‘Human Rights Wrangle’, The Spectator (2 September 2011)
Blackburn, R. and Polakiewicz, J.Fundamental Rights in Europe: The European Convention on Human Rights and its Member States, 1950–2000 (Oxford University Press, 2001)
Blackstone, W.Commentaries on the Law of England, Bk. III, 12th edn (London: Cadell, 1794)
Bleckmann, A. ‘Der Beurteilungsspielraum im Europa – und im Völkerrecht’, Europäische Grundrechte Zeitschrift (1979) 485–95
Bleckmann, A.Die Bindung der Europäischen Gemeinschaft an die Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention (Cologne: C. Heymann, 1986)
Blokker, N.Is the Authorization Authorized? Powers and Practice of the UN Security Council to Authorize the Use of Force by “Coalitions of the Able and Willing”’, European Journal of International Law 11 (2000) 541–68
Bodeau-Livinec, P.et al., ‘Case Note’, American Journal of International Law 102 (2008) 323–31
Bore Eveno, V.Le contrôle juridictionnel des résolutions du Conseil de Sécurité: Vers un constitutionnalisme international?’, Revue Générale de Droit International Public 110 (2006) 827–60
Bossuyt, M.‘It is by Ever Widening its Jurisdiction that the Court of Strasbourg is Going too far’, Paper presented at the ‘Expert Seminar: The Future of the European Court of Human Rights’, Institute for Human Rights, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 2 September 2011 (on file with the author)
Bothe, M.Peace-Keeping’, in B. Simma (ed.), The Charter of the United Nations. A Commentary, 2nd edn, Vol. I (Oxford University Press, 2002) 648–700
Bothe, M.Peacekeeping Forces’, in R. Wolfrum (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2008)
Bothe, M.Security Council's Targeted Sanctions against Presumed Terrorists’, Journal of International Criminal Justice 6 (2008) 541–55
Boulouis, J. ‘De la compétence de la Communauté européenne pour adhérer à la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l'homme et des libertés fondamentales: Avis 2/94 de la Cour de justice des Communautés’, Libertés 315–22
Bradford, A. and Posner, E.A.Universal Exceptionalism in International Law’, Harvard International Law Journal 52 (2011) 1–54
Bratza, N. ‘The Relationship between the UK Courts and Strasbourg’, European Human Rights Law Review 5 (2011) 505–12
Brauch, J. A.The Margin of Appreciation and the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: Threat to the Rule of Law’, Columbia Journal of European Law 11:1 (2004/2005) 113–50
Breitegger, A.Sacrificing the Effectiveness of the European Convention on Human Rights on the Altar of the Effective Functioning of Peace Support Operations: A Critique of Behrami and Saramati and Al Jedda’, International Community Law Review 11 (2009) 155–83
Brems, E.Human Rights: Universality and Diversity (The Hague: Kluwer, 2001)
Brems, E.The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 56:1–2 (1996) 240–314
Breyer, S.Introduction of President Luzius Wildhaber’, American University International Law Review 22:4 (2007) 517–20
Brian Simpson, A.Human Rights and the End of Empire: Britain and the Genesis of the European Convention (Oxford University Press, 2001)
Brouwer, A.Digital Borders and Real Rights: Effective Remedies for Third-country Nationals in the Schengen Information System (Leiden: Nijhoff, 2008)
Brown, L.N.et al. French Administrative Law, 5th edn (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998)
Bruinsma, F.J. and Parmentier, S.Interview with L. Wildhaber, President of the ECHR’, Netherlands Quarterly Review of Human Rights 21:2 (2003) 185–201
Buyse, A. ‘The Court's New Priority Policy’, 17 November 2010, http://echrblog.blogspot.com/2010/11/courts-new-priority-policy.html
Caflisch, L.Les conventions américaine et européenne des droits de l'homme et le droit international général’, Révue générale du droit international 108:5 (2004) 9–22
Çalı, B.The Legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights: The View from the Ground’ (Department of Political Science, University College London, 2011)
Callewaert, J. ‘Quel avenir pour la marge d'appreciation?’, in Mahoney et al. (eds.), Protecting Human Rights: The European Perspective: Studies in Memory of Rolv Ryssdal, 147–66
Cameron, I.Competing Rights?’, in S. de Vries, S. Weatherill and U. Bernitz (eds.), The Protection of Fundamental Rights in the EU after Lisbon (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013)
Cameron, I.Protecting Legal Rights: On the (in)security of Targeted Sanctions’, in P. Wallensteen and C. Staibano (eds.), International Sanctions: Between Words and Wars in the Global System (London and New York: Routledge, 2005) 181–206
Canivet, G.Protocol 11 to the ECHR: the European Court of Human Rights as a Constitutional Court?’, Yearbook of European Law 15 (1995) 219–62
Canivet, G.Cours suprêmes nationales et convention européenne des droits de l'homme: nouveau rôle ou bouleversement de l'ordre juridique interne? (Paris: Cour de Cassation, 2005)
Cardwell, P.J., French, D. and White, N.Comments’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 58 (2009) 233–40
Carozza, P.G.Subsidiarity as a Structural Principle of International Human Rights Law’, American Journal of International Law 97 (2003) 38–79
Cassel, D.The Expanding Scope and Impact of Reparations Awarded by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’, in K. De Feyteret al. (eds.), Out of the Ashes: Reparation for Victims of Gross and Systematic Human Rights Violations (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2005)
Cassese, A.The Nicaragua and Tadic Tests Revisited in Light of the ICJ Judgment on Genocide in Bosnia’, European Journal of International Law 18 (2007) 649–68
Chinkin, C. ‘International Humanitarian Law, Human Rights and the UK Courts’, in Boisson de Chazournes and Kohen (eds.), International Law and the Quest for its Implementation: Liber Amicorum Vera Gowlland-Debbas, 243–64
Christoffersen, J. ‘Individual and Constitutional Justice’, in Christoffersen and Madsen (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics, 181–203
Christoffersen, J.Primaritetsprinsippet – nye tanker om EMRKs stilling i dansk ret’, in Christoffersen and Madsen (eds.), Menneskerettighedsdomstolen – 50 års samspil med dansk ret og politik (Copenhagen: Thomson 2009)
Christoffersen, J.and Madsen, M.R.The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics (Oxford University Press, 2011)
Ciampi, A.Security Council Targeted Sanctions and Human Rights’, in B. Fassbender (ed.), Securing Human Rights? Achievements and Challenges of the UN Security Council (Oxford University Press, 2011)
Claes, M. and de Visser, M.Are You Networked Yet? On Dialogues in European Judicial Networks’, Utrecht Law Review 8:2 (2012) 100–14
Clapham, A. ‘The Subject of Subjects and the Attribution of Attribution’, in Boisson de Chazournes and Kohen (eds.), International Law and the Quest for its Implementation: Liber Amicorum Vera Gowlland-Debbas, 45–58
Clarke, K. Speech by Rt. Hon. Kenneth Clarke QC MP, Secretary of State for Justice, Lord Chancellor, 26 April 2011, High Level Conference on the Future of the European Court of Human Rights, Izmir, 26–7 April 2011. Available at: www.coe.int/t/dghl/standardsetting/conferenceizmir/Speeches/Speech%20UK.pdf
Cohen-Eliya, M. and Porat, I.Proportionality and the Culture of Justification’, American Journal of Comparative Law 59:2 (2010) 463–90
Cohen-Eliya, M. and Porat, I.The Hidden Foreign Law Debate in Heller: The Proportionality Approach in American Constitutional Law’, San Diego Law Review 46:2 (2009) 367–413
Conforti, B.Le principe d'équivalence et le contrôle sur les actes communautaires dans la jurisprudence de la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme’, in S. Breitenmoseret al. (eds.), Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law: Liber Amicorum Luzius Wildhaber (Zürich and Baden-Baden: Dike & Nomos, 2007) 173–82
Conroy, R.W.The UN Experience with Travel Sanctions: Selected Cases and Conclusions’, in D. Cortright and G.A. Lopez (eds.), Smart Sanctions: Targeting Economic Statecraft (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002) 145–69
Coomber, A.Judicial Independence: Law and Practice of Appointments to the European Court of Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review 5 (2003) 486–500
Coppell, J. and O'Neill, A.The European Court of Justice: Taking Rights Seriously?’, Common Market Law Review 29:4 (1992) 669–92
Cosgrove, E. ‘Examining Targeted Sanctions. Are Travel Bans Effective?’, in Wallensteen and Staibano (eds.), International Sanctions: Between Words and Wars in the Global System, 207–28
Costa, J.-P.Interview exclusive de Jean-Paul Costa, président de la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme’, Droits de l'homme – jurisprudence de la cour européenne des droits de l'homme, 5 (2007) 77–80
Craig, P. ‘Perspectives on Process: Common Law, Statutory and Political’, Public Law (2010) 275–96
Craig, P.The European Union Act 2011: Locks, Limits and Legality’, in P. Craig and G. de Búrca (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford University Press, 2012)
Crawford, J.International Law as an Open System’, in J. Crawford (ed.), International Law as an Open System (London: Cameron May Press, 2002) 17–38
Crema, L.Disappearance and New Sightings of Restrictive Interpretation(s)’, European Journal of International Law 21 (2010) 681–700
Daillier, P.et al. Droit international public (Paris: Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence, 2009)
Dannenbaum, T.Translating the Standard of Effective Control into a System of Effective Accountability: How Liability Should Be Apportioned for Violations of Human Rights by Member State Troop Contingents Serving as United Nations Peacekeepers’, Harvard International Law Journal 51 (2010) 113–92
de Búrca, G.The European Court of Justice and the International Legal Order after Kadi’, Harvard International Law Journal 51 (2010) 1–49
de Búrca, G.The Influence of European Legal Concepts on UK Law: Proportionality and Wednesbury Unreasonableness’, European Public Law 3 (1993) 561–87
de Búrca, G. and Weiler, J.H.H., ‘Introduction’, in G. de Búrca and J.H.H. Weiler (eds.), The Worlds of European Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press, 2012) 1–7
de Lange, R.Judicial Deliberations and Human Rights Adjudication’, in N. Huls, M. Adams and J. Bornhoff (eds.), The Legitimacy of Highest Courts' Ruling (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2009)
de Schutter, O.L'interprétation de la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme: un essai en démolition’, Revue de Droit International de Sciences Diplomatiques, Politiques, et Sociales 70 (1992) 83–127
de Wet, E. ‘Human Rights Considerations and the Enforcement of Targeted Sanctions in Europe: The Emergence of Core Standards of Judicial Protection’, in Fassbender (ed.), Securing Human Rights? Achievements and Challenges of the UN Security Council 141–71
de Wet, E.The Chapter VII Powers of the United Nations Security Council (Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing, 2004)
Devlin, P.The Judge (Oxford University Press, 1981)
Dorigo, S.Imputazione e responsabilità internazionale per l'attività delle forze di Peacekeeping delle Nazioni Unite’, Rivista di Diritto Internazionale 85 (2002) 903–45
Doswald-Beck, L.Human Rights in Times of Conflict and Terrorism (Oxford University Press, 2011) 22–5
Dowling, J. and Pfeffer, J.Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational Behavior’, The Pacific Sociological Review 18:1 (1975) 122–36
Doyle, M.Kant, Liberal Legacies and Foreign Affairs’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (1983) 205–23
Drzemezewski, A.Election des juges à la Cour Européenne de Strasbourg: un aperçu’, L'Europe des libertés 33 (2010) 6–10
Drzemezewski, A.Quelques observations sur le rôle de la Commission des questions juridiques et droits de l'homme de l'Assemblée parlementaire dans l'exécution des arrêts de la Cour de Strasbourg’, H. Hartig (ed.), Trente ans de droit européen des droits de l'homme: études à la mémoire de Wolfgang Strasser (Brussels: Nemesis, Bruylant, 2007), 55–63
Drzemezewski, A.The European Human Rights Convention: A New Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg as of 1 November 1998’, Washington and Lee Law Review 55:3 (1998) 697–736
Drzemezewski, A.The Internal Organisation of the European Court of Human Rights: The Composition of Chambers and the Grand Chamber’, European Human Rights Law Review 3 (2000) 233–48
Dupuy, P.M.Evolutionary Interpretation of Treaties: Between Memory and Prophecy’, in E. Cannizzaro (ed.), The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention (Oxford University Press, 2011) 123–37
Dutheillet de Lamothe, O.Olivier Dutheillet de Lamothe Member, Conseil constitutionnel France’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 3:4 (2005) 550–6
Dworkin, R.A Matter of Principle (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985)
Dworkin, R.Do Values Conflict? A Hedgehog's Approach’, Arizona Law Review 43 (2001) 251–9
Dworkin, R. ‘Even Bigots and Holocaust Deniers Must Have Their Say’, The Guardian, 14 February 2006
Dworkin, R.Hart's Postscript and the Character of Political Philosophy’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 24:1 (2004) 1–37
Dworkin, R.Justice in Robes (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006)
Dworkin, R.Law's Empire (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1986)
Dworkin, R.Rights as Trumps’, in J. Waldron (ed.), Theories of Rights (Oxford University Press, 1984) 153–67
Dworkin, R.Taking Rights Seriously (London: Duckworth, 1977)
Dzehtsiarou, K. ‘Does Consensus Matter? Legitimacy of European Consensus in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights’, Public Law (July 2011) 534–53
Dzehtsiarou, K. and Greene, A.Legitimacy and the Future of the European Court of Human Rights: Critical Perspectives from Academia and Practitioners’, German Law Journal 12:10 (2011) 1707–15
Eaton, M.The New Judicial Filtering Mechanism: Introductory Comments’, in Directorate General of Human Rights (ed.), Future Developments of the European Court of Human Rights in the Light of the Wise Persons' Report: Colloquy organized by the San Marino chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, San Marino, 22–3 March 2007 (France: Council of Europe, 2007)
Eckhoff. T.Rettskildelære (Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 2001)
Ejima, A.Yoroppa Jinken-Saibansho-niokeru “Hyoka-no-yochi” Riron-no Aratana Hatten’ (‘New Development of the “Margin of Appreciation” Doctrine in the European Court of Human Rights’), Meiji University Graduate School (Law) Review 29 (1992) 55–73
Endicott, T.A.O.Law and Language’, in J. Coleman and S. Shapiro (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law (Oxford University Press, 2002) 935–68
Endo, K. ‘Subsidiarity and its Enemies: To What Extent is Sovereignty Contested in the Mixed Commonwealth of Europe?’, EUI Working Papers, RSC No. 2001/24 at 36, available at www.eui.eu/RSCAS/WP-Texts/01_24.pdf
Endo, K.The Principle of Subsidiarity: From Johannes Althusius to Jacques Delors’, Hokkaido Law Review 44:6 (1994) 553–652
English, R. ‘Human Rights – Strasbourg or Luxembourg?’, UK Human Rights Blog (9 September 2011)
Everling, U.Europäische Union, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention und Verfassungsstaat: Schlusswort auf dem Symposion am 11. Juni 2005 in Bonn’, Europarecht 40:4 (2005) 411–18
Fairgrieve, D. and Muir Watt, H.Common Law et tradition civiliste: convergence ou concurrence? (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2006)
Fassbender, B.Securing Human Rights? Achievements and Challenges of the UN Security Council (Oxford University Press, 2011)
Fassbender, B.Targeted Sanctions Imposed by the UN Security Council and Due Process Rights: A Study Commissioned by the UN Office of Legal Affairs and Follow-up Action by the United Nations’, International Organizations Law Review 3 (2006) 437–85
Fassbender, B.UN Security Council Reform and the Right of Veto (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1998)
Finnis, J. ‘Natural Law: The Classical Tradition’, in Coleman and Shapiro (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law, 1–60
Fitzmaurice, M.Dynamic (Evolutive) Interpretation of Treaties I’, Hague Yearbook of International Law 21 (2008) 101–57
Flauss, J.-F.De l'indépendance de la Cour Européenne des droits de l'homme’, J.-F. Flauss (ed.), La mise en œuvre du Protocole n°11: le nouveau règlement de la CourEDH: actes de la journée d'études du 23 octobre 1999 à la mémoire de Louis Edmond Pettiti (Brussels: Bruylant 2000) 13–31
Flauss, J.-F. and Cohen-Jonathan, G.La Cour EDH et le Droit international’, Annuaire Français de Droit International 50 (2004) 778–802
Føllesdal, A.Legitimacy Deficits beyond the State: Diagnoses and Cures’, in A. Hurrelmann, S. Schneider and J. Steffek (eds.), Legitimacy in an Age of Global Politics (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2007) 211–28
Føllesdal. A.Subsidiarity’, Journal of Political Philosophy 6 (1998) 190–218
Føllesdal. A.The Legitimacy of International Human Rights Review: The Case of the European Court of Human Rights’, Journal of Social Philosophy 40:4 (2009) 595–607
Franck, T.Legitimacy in the International System’, American Journal of International Law 82:4 (1988) 705–59
Franck, T.The Power of Legitimacy among Nations (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990)
Frank, A.UNO-Sanktionen gegen Terrorismus und Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention (EMRK)’, in S. Breitenmoseret al. (eds.), Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law: Liber Amicorum Luzius Wildhaber (Zürich and Baden-Baden: Dike & Nomos, 2007) 237–60
French, D.Treaty Interpretation and the Incorporation of Extraneous Legal Rules’, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 55:2 (2006) 281–314
French, D.Die Kontrolldichte bei der gerichtlichen Überprüfung von Handlungen der Verwaltung (Berlin: Springer, 1993)
French, D.“The Transformation of Constitutional law through the European Convention on Human Rights”, Israel Law Review 41 (2008) 489–99
French, D.The UN Anti-Terrorism Administration and the Rule of Law’, in P.M. Dupuyet al. (eds.), Common Values in International Law: Essays in Honour of Christian Tomuschat (Kehl: N.P. Engel, 2006) 785–95
Furtado, C.F.Guess Who's Coming to Dinner? Protection for National Minorities in Eastern and Central Europe under the Council of Europe’, Columbia Human Rights Law Review 34 (2003) 333–412
Gaja, G.The Review by the European Court of Human Rights of Member States' Acts Implementing European Union Law: “Solange” Yet Again?’, in M. Shawet al. (eds.), Common Values in International Law: Essays in Honour of Christian Tomuschat (Kehl: N.P. Engel, 2006) 517–26
Gardiner, R.Treaty Interpretation (Oxford University Press, 2008)
Gerards, J. ‘Judicial Deliberations in the European Court of Human Rights’, in Huls et al. (eds.), The Legitimacy of Highest Courts' Rulings: Judicial Deliberations and Beyond, 407–36
Gerards, J.The Pilot Judgment Procedure before the European Court of Human Rights as an Instrument for Dialogue’, in M. Claes and P. Popelier (eds.), Constitutional Conversations (Antwerp, Oxford, Portland: Intersentia, forthcoming, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1924806
Giegerich, T.Die Verfassungsbeschwerde an der Schittstelle von deutschem, internationalem und supranationalem Recht’, C. Grabenwarter and S. Hammer (eds.), Allgemeinheit der Grundrechte und Vielfalt der Gesellschaft (Stuttgart: Richard Boorberg Verlag, 1994) 101ff
Giegerich, T.Wirkung und Rang der EMRK in den Rechtsordnungen der Mitgliedstaaten’, R. Grote, (ed.), EMRK/GG: Konkordanzkommentar zum europäischen und deutschen Grundrechtsschutz (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2006) 61–98
Grant, R. and Keohane, R.Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics’, American Political Science Review 99:1 (2005) 29–43
Greenberg, M. ‘The Standard Picture and its Discontents’ (available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1103569)
Greenberg, S.New Horizons for Human Rights: The European Convention, Court and Commission’, Columbia Law Review 63:8 (1963) 1384–412
Greer, S.“Balancing” and the European Court of Human Rights: A Contribution to the Habermas–Alexy Debate’, Cambridge Law Journal 63 (2004) 412–34
Greer, S.Constitutionalising Adjudication under the European Convention on Human Rights’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 23 (2003) 405–33
Greer, S.The European Convention on Human Rights: Achievements, Problems and Prospects (Cambridge University Press, 2006)
Greer, S.The Margin of Appreciation: Interpretation and Discretion under the European Convention on Human Rights, Human Rights Files No. 17 (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2000)
Greer, S.What's Wrong with the European Convention on Human Rights?’, Human Rights Quarterly 30 (2008) 680–702
Groussot, X.European Rights' and Dialogues in the Context of Constitutional’, Scandinavian Studies in Law 55 (2010) 45–75
Groves, J. ‘Human Rights Act is GOOD for us, insists Clegg in direct challenge to Cameron’, Mail Online (27 August 2011)
Grozev, Y.How Human Rights Protection has Evolved: A Critical Analysis of Ten Years of Case Law’, in ECtHR (ed.), Ten Years of the ‘New’ European Court of Human Rights 1998–2008, Situation and Outlook (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2009) 34–9
Guyomar, M. ‘Conclusions sur Conseil d'État, Assemblée, 14 December 2007, M. Planchenault (1re espèce), et Garde des sceaux, ministre de la Justice c/ M. Boussouar (2e espèce)’, Revue Française de Droit Administratif (2008)
Guyomar, M.Le dialogue des jurisprudences entre le Conseil d'État et la Cour de Strasbourg: appropriation, anticipation, émancipation’, in Mélanges en l'honneur de Jean-Paul Costa (Paris: Dalloz, 2011) 311–20
Guyomar, M.et al., Contentienx Administratif (Paris: Dalloz, 2010)
Habermas, J.Between Facts and Norms (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996)
Habermas, J.Intolerance and Discrimination’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 1 (2003) 2–12
Habermas, J.Toward a Cosmopolitan Europe’, Journal of Democracy 14 (2003) 86–100
Hale, B.“Argentoratum Locutum”: Is Strasbourg or the Supreme Court Supreme?’, Human Rights Law Review 12 (2012) 65–78
Hale, B.Beanstalk or Living Instrument?’ in ECtHR (ed.), Dialogue between Judges (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2011)
Hale, B. ‘European Court of Human Rights: The Limits to the Evolutive Interpretation of the Convention’ at www.echr.coe.int/ECHR/EN/Header/The+Court/Events+at+the+court/Opening+of+the+judicial+year/ (15 April 2011)
Hale, Sir M.The History of the Common Law of England, 6th edn (London: H. Butterworth, 1820)
Halpérin, J.L.Les mondialisations du droit (Paris: Dalloz, 2009)
Halpérin, J.L.L'impossible code civil (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1992)
Hampson, F.The Future of the European Court of Human Rights’, in G. Gilbert, F. Hampson and C. Sandoval (eds.), Strategic Visions for Human Rights: Essays in Honour of Professor Kevin Boyle (London and New York: Routledge, 2011) 141–66
Hansel, B. ‘Effektiver Rechtsschutz in Grundrechtsfragen durch Vorlagepflicht oberster Bundesgerichte oder europäische Verfassungsbeschwerde’, Walter Hallstein-Institut, WHI Paper 6/03 (2003)
Haratsch, A.Die Solange-Rechtsprechung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte: das Kooperationsverhältnis zwischen EGMR und EuGH’, Zeitschrift für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 66:4 (2006) 927–47
Harmsen, R.The European Court of Human Rights as a “Constitutional Court”’, in J. Morison, K. McEvoy and G. Anthony (eds.), Judges, Transition and Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2007) 33–53
Harris, D.J.et al. Law of the ECHR, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2009)
Hart, H.L.A.Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals’, Harvard Law Review 71 (1957) 593–629
Hart, H.L.A.The Concept of Law, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 1994)
Heckscher, S.Finns det någon europeisk rätt?C. Wong (ed.), Festskrift till Per Ole Träskman (Stockholm: Norstedts, 2011)
Hedigan, J.The Election of Judges to the European Court of Human Rights’, in M.G. Kohen (ed.), Promoting Justice, Human Rights and Conflict Resolution through International Law: Liber Amicorum Lucius Caflish (Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2007) 235–53
Helfer, L.R.Alter, K.J. and Guerzovich, M.F. ‘Islands of Effective International Adjudication: Constructing an Intellectual Property Rule of Law in the Andean Community’, American Journal of International Law (2009) 1–47
Helgesen, J.E.What are the Limits to the Evolutive Interpretation of the Convention?’, in ECtHR (ed.), Dialogue between Judges (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2011) 19–28
Hennette-Vauchez, S. ‘Constitutional v. International? When Unified Reformatory Rational Mismatch the Plural Paths of Legitimacy of ECHR Law’, in Christoffersen and Madsen (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights Between Law and Politics, 144–63
Heringa, A.W. and Kiiver, P.Constitutions Compared: An Introduction to Comparative Constitutional Law, 2nd edn (Ius Commune Europaeum, Antwerp, Oxford, Maastricht: Intersentia, Metro, 2009)
Herne Hill, Lord Lester of.The European Court of Human Rights after 50 Years’, European Human Rights Law Review 4 (2009) 461–78
Herne Hill, Lord Lester of. ‘Universal versus Subsidiarity: A Reply’, European Human Rights Law Review (1998) 73–81
Herring, J.Who Decides on Human Rights?’, Law Quarterly Review 125 (2009) 1–5
Hershovitz, S.Integrity and Stare Decisis’, in S. Hershovitz (ed.), Exploring Law's Empire (Oxford University Press, 2006) 103–18
Heun, W.The Constitution of Germany: A Contextual Analysis (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011)
Heuschling, L.Comparative Law in French Human Rights Cases’, in E. Örücü (ed.), Judicial Comparativism in Human Rights Cases (United Kingdom National Committee of Comparative Law, 2003) 23–47
Hilf, M.Europäische Union und Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention’, Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law (ed.), Recht zwischen Umbruch und Bewahrung: Festschrift für Rudolf Bernhardt (Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer, 1995) 1193–1210
Himma, K.E. ‘Inclusive Legal Positivism’, in Coleman and Shapiro (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law, 125–65
Hirsch, M.The Responsibility of International Organizations Toward Third Parties: Some Basic Principles (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1995) 66–71
Hirschl, R.Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004)
Hoffmann, L.Human Rights and the House of Lords’, Modern Law Review 62 (1999) 159–66
Hoffmann, L. ‘The Universality of Human Rights’, Judicial Studies Boards Annual Lecture (2009)
Hofmann, M.Zum zweiten “Lissabon-Urteil” des Tschechischen Verfassungsgerichts’, Europäische Grundrechtzeitschrift 37: 5–6 (2010) 153–6
Hölderlin, F.Patmos’, in E. L. Santner (ed.), Hyperion and Selected Poems (New York: Continuum, 1990)
Human Rights Association. ‘Cameron Warned over Human Rights’, The Guardian, 21 August 2011
Hurd, I.Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics’, International Organization 53:2 (1999) 379–408
Isensee, J.Subsidiarität, das Prinzip und seine Prämissen’, P. Blickle, T.O. Hüglin and D. Wyduckel (eds.), Subsidiarität als rechtliches und politisches Ordnungsprinzip in Kirche, Staat und Gesellschaft, Beiheft 20 (Berlin: Duncker und Humboldt, 2001) 129–77
Jaag, T.Beitritt der EG zur EMRK?: zum Gutachten 2/94 des Europäischen Gerichtshofs’, Aktuelle Juristische Praxis 5:8 (1996) 980–4
Janik, C.Die EMRK und internationale Organisationen – Ausdehnung und Restriktion der equivalent protection Formel in der neuen Rechtsprechung des EGMR’, Zeitschrift für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 70 (2010) 127–79
Jennings, C.Oppenheim's International Law, Vol. I (London: Longman, 1992)
Kaboğlu, I. O. and Koutnatzis, S. I. G.The Reception Process in Greece and Turkey’, in Keller and Stone Sweet (eds.), A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems, 452–531
Kastanas, E.Unité et diversité: notions autonomes et marge d'appréciation des États dans la jurisprudence de la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme (Brussels: Bruylant, 1996)
Kavanagh, A.Defending Deference in Public Law and Constitutional Theory’, Law Quarterly Review 126 (2010) 222–50
Keller, H. and Stone Sweet, A.A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legel Systems (Oxford University Press, 2008)
Keller, H., Fischer, A. and Kühne, D.Draft Statute for the European Court of Human Rights – A Contribution to Reforming the European System’, Human Rights Law Journal 30 (2011) 1–12
Keller, H., Fischer, A. and Kühne, D.Debating the Future of the European Court of Human Rights after the Interlaken Conference: Two Innovative Proposals’, European Journal of International Law 21:4 (2010) 1025–48
Keller, H., Forowicz, M. and Engi, L.Friendly Settlements before the European Court of Human Rights: Theory and Practice (Oxford University Press, 2010)
Keller, P.Re-thinking Ethnic and Cultural Rights in Europe’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 18 (1998) 29–59
Klabbers, J.Kadi Justice at the Security Council?’, International Organizations Law Review 4 (2007) 293–304
Klabbers, J., UlfsteinG. and Peters, A.The Constitutionalization of International Law (Online edn Oxford Scholarship Online, Oxford University Press, 2009)
Kolb, R.Le contrôle de Résolutions contraignantes du Conseil de sécurité des Nations Unies par des jurisdictions internationales ou nationales sous l'angle du respect du jus cogens’, Revue Suisse de Droit International et Européen (2008) 401–41
Koroteev, K.Judgment of the Russian Constitutional Court on Supervisory Review in Civil Proceedings: Denial of Justice, Denial of Europe’, Human Rights Law Review 7 (2007) 619–32
Kress, K.Legal Indeterminacy’, California Law Review 77 (1989) 283–337
Krzyżanowska-Mierzewska, M., ‘The Reception Process in Poland and Slovakia’, in Keller and Stone Sweet (eds.), A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems
Kumm, M.Constitutional Rights as Principles: On the Structure and Domain of Constitutional Justice' – A Review Essay on “A Theory of Constitutional Rights”’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 2:3 (2004) 574–96
Kumm, M.The Legitimacy of International Law: A Constitutionalist Framework of Analysis’, European Journal of International Law 15:5 (2004) 907–31
Lagrange, P.Responsabilité des Etats pour actes accomplis en application du Chapitre VII de la Charte des Nations Unies’, Revue Générale de Droit International Public 112 (2008) 85–110
Lambert, P.Marge nationale d'appréciation et contrôle de proportionnalité’, F. Sudre (ed.), L'interprétation de la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme (Brussels: Bruylant, 1998) 63–89
Lambert-Abdelgawad, E.L'exécution des décisions des juridictions internationales des droits de l'homme: vers une harmonisation des systèmes régionaux’, Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional 2010–3 Especial, 9–55
Lambert Abdelgawad, E.L'exécution des décisions des juridictions européennes (Cour de Justice des Communautés Européennes et Cour Européenne des Droits de l'Homme)’, Annuaire Français de Droit International 52 (2006) 676–724
Lambert Abdelgawad, E.Le Protocole 14 et l'exécution des arrêts de la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme’, in G. Cohen-Jonathan and J. F. Flauss (eds.), La réforme du système de contrôle contentieux de la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme (Brussels: Bruylant, Nemesis, 2005) 79–113
Lambert Abdelgawad, E.Preventing and Sanctioning Hindrances to the Right of Individual Petition before the ECtHR (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2011)
Lambert Abdelgawad, E.The Execution of the Judgments of the ECtHR: Towards a Non-coercive and Participatory Model of Accountability’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 69:3 (2009) 471–506
Lambert Abdelgawad, E.The Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, 2nd edn (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2008)
Lasser, M. D. S.Judicial Deliberations: A Comparative Analysis of Judicial Transparency and Legitimacy (Oxford University Press 2004)
Leach, P.Access to the ECtHR – From a Legal Entitlement to a Lottery?’, Human Rights Law Journal 27 (2006) 11–25
Leach, P.Quelles sont les réparations adéquates dans les affaires de ‘disparitions’? Leçons issues des affaires sur la Tchétchénie’, E. Lambert-Abdelgawad and K. Martin-Chenut (eds.), Réparer les violations graves et massives des droits de l'homme: La Cour InterAméricaine, pionnière et modèle?, Collection de L'UMR De Droit Comparé de Paris, Vol. XX (Paris: Société de Législation Comparée, 2010)
Leach, P.Responding to Systemic Human Rights Violations: An Analysis of Pilot Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights and their Impact at National Level (Antwerp, Oxford, Portland: Intersentia, 2010)
Leach, P.Taking a Case to the European Court of Human Rights, 3rd edn (Oxford University Press, 2011) 466–8
Leach, P.The Chechen Conflict: Analysing the Oversight of the European Court of Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review (2008) 732–61
Lester, A. ‘Beyond Wednesbury: Substantive Principles of Administrative Law’, Public Law (1987) 368
Lester, A.The European Court of Human Rights after 50 Years’, in Christoffersen and Madsen (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights Between Law and Politics, 98–115
Letsas, G.A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2007)
Letsas, G.Judge Rozakis's Separate Opinions and the Strasbourg Dilemma’, in D. Spielmann, M. Tsirli and P. Voyatzis (eds.), The European Convention on Human Rights: A Living Instrument, Essays in Honour of Christos L. Rozakis (Brussels: Bruylant, 2011)
Letsas, G.No Human Right to Adopt?’, UCL Human Rights Review 1:1 (2008) 134–53
Letsas, G.Strasbourg's Interpretive Ethic: Lessons for the International Lawyer’, European Journal of International Law 21:3 (2010) 509–41
Letsas, G.The Truth in Autonomous Concepts: How to Interpret the ECHR’, European Journal of International Law 15:2 (2004) 279–305
Letsas, G.Two Concepts of the Margin of Appreciation’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26:4 (2006) 705–32
Limbach, J.et al. Judicial Independence: Law and Practice of Appointments to the European Court of Human Rights (London: Interights, 2003)
Lock, T.Accession of the EU to the ECHR: Who Would Be Responsible in Strasbourg?’ in D. Ashiagbor, N. Countouris and I. Lianos (eds.), The European Union after the Treaty of Lisbon (Cambridge University Press, 2012)
Lock, T.EU Accession to the ECHR: Implications for the Judicial Review in Strasbourg’, European Law Review 35:6 (2010) 777–98
Lock, T.The ECJ and the ECtHR: The Future Relationship between the Two European Courts’, The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 8:3 (2009) 375–98
Lockhart, N.J.S. and Weiler, J.H.H.“Taking Rights Seriously” Seriously: The European Court and its Fundamental Rights Jurisprudence’, Common Market Law Review 32:1 (1995) 51–94 (Part I) and 579–627 (Part II)
Lorange Backer, I.Begrunnelse for avsiling av en sivil ankesak’, Lov og Rett 48:8 (2009) 49–51
Lucy, W. ‘Adjudication’, in Coleman and Shapiro (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law, 206–67
Lugato, M.Sono le sanzioni del Consiglio di Sicurezza incompatibili con il rispetto delle garanzie procedurali?’, Rivista di Deritto Internazionale 93 (2010) 309–42
Macdonald, R.St.J.The Margin of Appreciation’, in R.St.J. Macdonald, F. Matscher and H. Petzold (eds.), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights (Dordrecht/London: Martinus Nijhoff, 1994) 83–124
Machinska, H. ‘Pilot Lowyer Project Developed by the Council of Europe to Make Direct Access to the ECtHR Easier and More Effective for Individuals’, in Lambert-Abdelgawad, Preventing and Sanctioning Hindrances
Macklem, P.Militant Democracy, Legal Pluralism, and the Paradox of Self-Determination’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 4 (2006) 488–516
Mahoney, P.Judicial Activism and Judicial Self-Restraint in the European Court of Human Rights: Two Sides of the Same Coin’, Human Rights Law Journal 11 (1990) 57–80
Mahoney, P.Marvellous Richness of Diversity or Invidious Cultural Relativism?’, Human Rights Law Journal 19:1 (1998) 1–6
Mahoney, P.New Challenges for the European Court of Human Rights Resulting from the Expanding Case Load and Membership’, Penn State International Law Review 21:1 (2002) 101–14
Mahoney, P.Universality versus Subsidiarity in the Strasbourg Case Law on Free Speech: Explaining Some Recent Judgments’, European Human Rights Law Review 4 (1997) 364–79
Marchenko, M.N.Yuridicheskaya priroda i charakter resheny Evropeyskogo Suda po pralam cheloveka’, Gusodarstvo i Pravo, 2 (2006)
Matscher, E. ‘Methods of Interpretation of the Convention’, in Macdonald et al. (eds.), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights
Maurer, A.The Federal Constitutional Court's Emergency Power to Intervene: Provisional Measures Pursuant to Article 32 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act’, German Law Journal 2 (2001)
McGoldrick, D.Multiculturalism and its Discontents’, Human Rights Law Review 5 (2005) 27–56
McNair, A.The Law of Treaties (Oxford University Press, 1968)
Merkel, G.Incompatible Contrasts? Preventive Detention in Germany and the European Convention on Human Rights’, German Law Journal 11 (2010) 1046–66
Meron, T.Martens Clause, Principles of Humanity, and Dictates of Public Conscience’, American Journal of International Law 94 (2000) 78–89
Messineo, F.The House of Lords in Al-Jedda and Public International Law’, Netherlands International Law Review 56 (2009) 35–62
Metcalf, E. ‘Time for the UK Supreme Court to Think Again on Hearsay’, The Guardian, 15 December 2011
Milanović, M. and Papić, T.As Bad As It Gets: The European Court's Behrami and Saramati Decision and General International Law’, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 58:2 (2009) 267–96
Minichmayr, G.Der Beitritt der Europäischen Gemeinschaft zur Konvention zum Schutze der Menschenrechte und Grundfreiheiten (Euro-Jus, Schriftenreihe der Abteilung für Europäische Integration, Krems: Donau Universität, 1999)
Möller, K.Balancing and the Structure of Constitutional Rights’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 5:3 (2007) 453–68
Møse, E. ‘Norway’, in Blackburn and Polakiewicz (eds.), Fundamental Rights in Europe: The European Convention on Human Rights and its Member States, 1950–2000, 636–7
Mosler, H.Die Entstehung des Modells supranationaler und gewaltenteilender Staatenverbindungen in den Verhandlungen über den Schuman-Plan’, E. von Caemmereret al. (eds.), Probleme des europäischen Rechts: Festschrift für Walter Hallstein (Frankfurt/Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1966) 355–86
Mowbray, A.A Study of the Principle of Fair Balance in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Review 10 (2010) 289–317
Mowbray, A.The Consideration of Gender in the Process of Appointing Judges to the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Review 8:3 (2008) 549–59
Mowbray, A.The Interlaken Declaration: The Beginning of a New Era for the European Court of Human Rights?’, Human Rights Law Review 10:3 (2010) 519–28
Myjer, E.et al. (eds.), The Conscience of Europe: 50 Years of the European Court of Human Rights (London: Council of Europe, Third Millennium Publishing Limited, 2010)
Ní Aoláin, F.The Emergence of Diversity: Differences in Human Rights Jurisprudence’, Fordham International Law Journal 19 (1995–6) 101–42
Nishikata, T.Oushu-Jinken-Joyaku derogation-joko-to “Hyoka-no-Yochi”: Jinken-Saibansho-no Tosei-wo Chushin-ni’ (‘The Derogation Clause of the ECHR – Judicial Control by the European Court of Human Rights’), Kobe Hogaku-Zasshi (Kobe Law Journal) 50:2 (2000) 149–86
Nollkaemper, A.Dual Attribution: Liability of the Netherlands for Conduct of Dutchbat in Srebrenica’, Journal of International Criminal Justice 9 (2011) 1143–57
Nolte, G.General Principles of German and European Administrative Law – A Comparison in Historical Perspective’, Modern Law Review 57 (1994) 191–212
Nolte, G. ‘Human Rights Protection against International Institutions in Kosovo: The Proposals of the Venice Commission of the Council of Europe and their Implementation’, in Dupuy et al. (eds.), Common Values in International Law: Essays in Honour of Christian Tomuschat, 245–58
Norges offentlige Utredninger, Makt og demokrati, Sluttrapport fra Makt-og demokratiutredningen (Oslo: Statens forvaltningstjeneste Informasjonsforvaltning, 2003)
Nowlin, C.The Protection of Morals under the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms’, Human Rights Quarterly 24 (2002) 264–86
Nußberger, A. ‘The Reception Process in Russia and Ukraine’, in Keller and Stone Sweet (eds.), A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems, 604–77
O'Boyle, M.On Reforming the Operation of the European Court of Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review 1 (2008) 3–4
O'Boyle, M. ‘The Future’, in Myjer et al. (eds.), The Conscience of Europe: 50 Years of the European Court of Human Rights
O'Donnell, T.The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine: Standards in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly 4 (1982) 474–96
O'Meara, N.A More Secure Europe of Rights? The European Court of Human Rights, the Court of Justice of the European Union and EU Accession to the ECHR’, German Law Journal 12 (2011) 1813–32
Oeter, S.Die Kontrolldichte hinsichtlich unbestimmter Begriffe und des Ermessens’, in Frowein (ed.), Die Kontrolldichte bei der gerichtlichen Überprüfung von Handlungen der Verwaltung (Berlin: Springer, 1993) 266–91
Pache, E. and Rösch, F.Europäischer Grundrechtsschutz nach Lissabon: die Rolle der EMRK und der Grundrechtecharta in der EU’, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 19:17 (2008) 519–22
Pannick, D., ‘Principles of Interpretation of Convention Rights under the Human Rights Act and the Discretionary Area of Judgment’, Public Law (1998) 545–51
Paul, J.R.Comity in International Law’, Harvard International Law Journal 32:1 (1991) 1–80
Pavlakos, G.Constitutional Rights, Balancing and the Structure of Autonomy’, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 24:1 (2011) 129–54
Payandeh, M.Constitutional Review of EU Law After Honeywell: Contextualizing the Relationship Between the German Constitutional Court and the EU Court of Justice’, Common Market Law Review 48 (2011) 9–38
Payandeh, M.Rechtskontrolle des UN-Sicherheitsrates durch staatliche und überstaatliche Gerichte’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 66 (2006) 41–71
Pérez, J.R.-Z.The Dynamic Effect of the Case-law of the European Court of Human Rights and the Role of the Constitutional Courts’, in ECtHR (ed.), Dialogue between Judges (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2007) 36–52
Peters, A.Die Anwendbarkeit der EMRK in Zeiten komplexer Hoheitsgewalt und das Prinzip der Grundrechtstoleranz’, Archiv des Völkerrechts 48:1 (2010) 22–41
Peters, A.Rechtsordnungen und Konstitutionalisierung: Zur Neubestimmung der Verhältnisse’, Zeitschrift für Öffentliches Recht 65 (2010) 3–63
Peters, B.Germany's Dialogue with Strasbourg: Extrapolating the Bundesverfassungsgericht's Relationship with the European Court of Human Rights in the Preventive Detention Decision’, German Law Journal 13 (2012) 757–72
Petzold, H. ‘The Convention and the Principle of Subsidiarity’, in Macdonald et al. (eds.), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights, 41–62
Philippi, N.Divergenzen im Grundrechtsschutz zwischen EuGH und EGMR’, Zeitschrift für europarechtliche Studien 3:1 (2000) 97–126
Pinna, A. ‘Filtering Applications, the Number of Judgments Delivered and Judicial Decisions by Supreme Courts: Some Thoughts based on the French Example’, in Huls, Adams and Bornhoff (eds.), The Legitimacy of Highest Courts' Ruling
Polakiewicz, J.The European Union's Charter of Fundamental Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights: Competition or Coherence in Fundamental Rights Protection in Europe’, Revue européenne de droit public 14:1 (2002) 853–78
Pollicino, O.et al. ‘Report on Italy’, in O. Pollicino (ed.), The National Judicial Treatment of the ECHR and EU Laws: A Comparative Perspective (Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, 2010) 269–95
Popelier, P., Heyning, C.V.D. and Nuffel, P.V.Human Rights Protection in the European Legal Order: The Interaction between the European and the National Courts (Law and Cosmopolitan Values) (Cambridge, Portland: Intersentia, 2011)
Proelss, A.Der Grundsatz der völkerrechtsfreundlichen Auslegung im Lichte der Rechtsprechung des BVerfG’, H. Rensen and S. Brink (eds.), Linien der Rechtsprechung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts – erörtert von den wissenschatlichen Mitarbeitern (Berlin: De Gruyter Recht, 2009) 553–84
Puente Egido, I.Adhesión de la Unión Europea al Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos?’, Soberanía del estado y derecho internacional 2 (2005) 1119–44
Quinn, G.The European Union and the Council of Europe on the Issue of Human Rights: Twins Separated at Birth?’, McGill Law Journal 46:4 (2001) 849–74
Raab, D.J.Strasbourg in the Dock: Prisoner Voting, Human Rights and the Case for Democracy (London: Civitas, 2011)
Ratner, S.R.The New UN Peacekeeping (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1995)
Rawls, J.Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993)
Raz, J.Ethics in the Public Domain (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995)
Raz, J.The Authority of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979)
Raz, J.The Morality of Freedom (Oxford University Press, 1986)
Raz, J.The Problem of Authority: Revisiting the Service Conception’, Minnesota Law Review 90 (2006) 1003–44
Rebasti, E.Corte Europea dei diritti dell'uomo e responsabilità degli Stati per trasferimento di poteri ad una organizzazione internazionale’, Rivista di Diritto internazionale 93 (2010) 65–88
Rehnquist, W.The Notion of a Living Constitution’, Texas Law Review 54 (1976) 693–706
Reich, N.Wer hat Angst vor Straßburg?', Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 22:10 (2011) 379–84
Reich, N.Zur Notwendigkeit einer Europäischen Grundrechtsbeschwerde’, Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik (2000) 6 375–8
Reinisch, A.Developing Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Accountability of the Security Council for the Imposition of Economic Sanctions’, American Journal of International Law 95 (2001) 851–72
Rengeling, H.W.Brauchen wir die Verfassungsbeschwerde auf Gemeinschaftsebene?’, O. Duel, M. Lutter, and J. Schwarze (eds.), Festschrift für Ulrich Everling (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1995) 1187f.
Rivers, J.Proportionality and Variable Intensity of Review’, Cambridge Law Journal 65:1 (2006) 174–207
Rozenberg, J. ‘Draft Brighton Declaration is a breath of fresh air’, The Guardian, 9 April 2012
Ruffert, M.Die künftige Rolle des EuGH im europäischen Grundrechtsschutzsystem: Bemerkungen zum EuGH-Urteil v. 20.5.2003’, Europäische Grundrechte-Zeitschrift 31:16/18 (2004) 466–71
Ryngaert, C.The European Court of Human Rights Approach to the Responsibility of Member States in Connection with Acts of International Organizations’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 60 (2011) 997–1016
Ryssdal, R.Opinion: The Coming of Age of the European Convention on Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review 1:1 (1996) 18–29
Sadurski, W.Law's Legitimacy and “Democracy-Plus”’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26:2 (2006) 377–409
Sadurski, W.Partnering with Strasbourg: Constitutionalisation of the European Court of Human Rights, the Accession of Central and East European States to the Council of Europe, and the Idea of Pilot Judgments’, Human Rights Law Review 9 (2009) 397–453
Sager, L.The Incorrigible Constitution’, New York University Law Review 65 (1990) 893–961
Sales, P. ‘The General and the Particular: Parliament and the Courts under the Scheme of the European Convention on Human Rights’, in Andenas et al. (eds.), Tom Bingham and the Transformation of the Law: A Liber Amicorum, 163–82
Sales, P.et al. ‘Rights-Consistent Interpretation and the Human Rights Act 1998’, Law Quarterly Review 127 (2011) 217–38
Salvioli, F.Un Analisis desde el principio pro persona sobre el valor juridica de las Decisiones de la Comision Interamericana de Derechos Humanos’, En Defensa de la Constitución: Libro Homenaje a Germán Bidart Campos (Buenos Aires: Ediar, 2003)
Sandoval, C. and Duttwiler, M.Redressing Non-pecuniary Damages of Torture Survivors: The Practice of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’, in G. Gilbert, F. Hampson and C. Sandoval (eds.), The Delivery of Human Rights: Essays in Honour of Professor Sir Nigel Rodley (London and New York: Routledge, 2011) 114–36
Sands, P. ‘Lord Bingham of Cornhill Obituary’, The Guardian, 11 September 2010
Sari, A.Jurisdiction and International Responsibility in Peace Support Operations: The Behrami and Saramati Cases’, Human Rights Law Review 8 (2008) 151–70
Sarooshi, D.International Organizations and Their Exercise of Sovereign Powers (Oxford University Press, 2005)
Sarooshi, D.The United Nations and the Development of Collective Security: The Delegation by the UN Security Council of its Chapter VII Powers (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999)
Scalia, A.Common Law Courts in a Civil Law System: The Role of United States Federal Courts in Interpreting the Constitution and Laws’, in A. Gutmann (ed.), A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law (Princeton University Press, 1998) 3–48
Schapiro, R.A.Polyphonic Federalism: Toward the Protection of Fundamental Rights (University of Chicago Press, 2009)
Scharpf, F.Problem-Solving Effectiveness and Democratic Accountability in the EU’, MPIfG Working Paper 03/1 (2003)
Scheeck, L. ‘Diplomatic Intrusions, Dialogues, and Fragile Equilibria: The European Court as a Constitutional Actor of the European Union’, in Christoffersen and Madsen (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights Between Law and Politics, 164–80
Scheeck, L.The Relationship between the European Courts and Integration through Human Rights’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 65 (2005) 837–85
Schlütter, B. (now B. Peters)Aspects of Human Rights Interpretation by the UN Treaty Bodies’, in G. Ulfstein and H. Keller (eds.), UN Treaty Bodies: Law and Legitimacy (Cambridge: University Press, 2012) 261–319
Schlütter, B.Crucifixes in Italian Classrooms: Lautsi v Italy’, European Human Rights Law Review 6 (2011) 86–92
Schütze, J.P.Die Zurechenbarkeit von Völkerrechtsverstößen im Rahmen mandatierter Friedensmissionen der Vereinten Nationen (Berlin: Duncker & Humboldt, 2011)
Schütze, J.P.Subsidiarity after Lisbon: Reinforcing the Safeguards of Federalism?’, Cambridge Law Journal 68 (2009) 525–36
Shany, Y. ‘Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts: Can the Unquantifiable be Quantified?’, Hebrew University International Law Research Paper No. 03/10
Shany, Y.Regulating Jurisdictional Relations betwen National and International Courts (International Courts and Tribunals) (Oxford University Press, 2007)
Shany, Y.Toward a General Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in International Law?’, European Journal of International Law 16:5 (2005) 907–40
Sharpe, R.The Impact of a Bill of Rights on the Role of the Judiciary: A Canadian Perspective’, in P. Alston (ed.), Promoting Human Rights through Bills of Rights: Comparative Perspectives (Oxford University Press, 1999) 431–53
Shelton, D.Remedies in International Human Rights Law, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2005)
Sherwin, E., ‘Rule-Oriented Realism’, Michigan Law Review 103 (2005) 1578–94
Sicilianos, L.A.L'(ir)responsabilité des forces multinationales’, in Boisson de Chazournes and Kohen (eds.), Liber Amicorum Vera Gowlland-Debbas (Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2010)
Siekmann, R.C.R.National Contingents in United Nations Peace-Keeping Forces (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1991)
Simma, B.Harmonizing Investment Protection and International Human Rights: First Steps towards a Methodology’, in C. Binder (ed.), International Investment Law for the 21st Century (Oxford University Press, 2009) 685–94
Simmons, B.Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics (Cambridge University Press, 2009)
Singh, M.P.German Administrative Law: In Common Law Perspective, 2nd edn (Berlin: Springer, 2001).
Singh, R.Is There a Role for the “Margin of Appreciation” in National Law after the Human Rights Act?’, European Human Rights Law Review (1999) 15–22
Sitaropoulos, N. ‘Implementation of the European Court of Human Rights' Judgments concerning National Minorities or why Declaratory Adjudication does not Help’, European Society of International Law Conference Paper Series, No. 4/2011
Skoghøy, J.E.A.Norske domstolers lovkontroll i forhold til inkorporerte menneskerettskonvensjoner’, Lov og Rett 41:06 (2002) 337–54
Smith, C. ‘The Interaction between the European Convention and the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms within the Norwegian Legal System’, in Mahoney et al. (eds.), Protecting Human Rights: The European Perspective, 1306–7
Spielmann, D. ‘Allowing the Right Margin; the European Court of Human Rights and the National Margin of Appreciation Doctrine: Waiver or Subsidiarity of European Review?’, CELS Working Paper Series, February 2012
Spiering, M.Englishness: Foreigners and Images of National Identity in Postwar Literature. Studia Imagologica: Comparative Literature and European Diversity (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1992)
Stahn, C.The Law and Practice of International Territorial Administration (Cambridge University Press, 2008)
Stavropoulos, N. ‘Why Principles?’ (available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1023758)
Stirn, B.Les Libertés en Question, 7th edn (Paris: Lextenso Editions, 2010)
Stirn, B.Les sources constitutionnelles du droit administratif: Introduction au droit public, 6th edn (Paris: Lextenso Editions, 2008)
Stirn, B.et al. Droits et libertés en France et au Royaume-Uni (Paris: Odile Jacob, 2006)
Stone Sweet, A.A Cosmopolitan Legal Order: Constitutional Pluralism and Rights Adjudication in Europe’, Journal of Global Constitutionalism 1:1 (2012) 53–90
Stone Sweet, A.Assessing the Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems’, in A. Stone Sweet (ed.), A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems (Oxford University Press, 2008) 677–712
Stone Sweet, A.Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe (Oxford University Press, 2000)
Stone Sweet, A.Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 47 (2008) 73
Stone Sweet, A.Sur la constitutionalisation de la Convention Européenne des Droits de l'Homme: Cinquante ans après son installation, la Cour Européenne des Droits de l'Homme conçue comme une Cour constitutionelle’, Revue Trimestrielle des Droits de l'Homme 80 (2009) 923–44
Stone Sweet, A.and Mathews, J.Proportionality, Judicial Review, and Global Constitutionalism’, in G. Bongiovanni, G. Sartor and C. Valentini (eds.), Reasonableness and Law (Law and Philosophy Library) (Dordrecht, Heidelberg: Springer Netherlands, 2009) 171–214
Stone Sweet, A. ‘Introduction: The Reception of the ECHR in National Legal Order’, in Stone Sweet (ed.) A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems, 11–36
Sudre, F.Du “dialogue des juges” à l'euro-compatibilité’, Le dialogue des juges: Mélanges en l'honneur du président Bruno Genevois (Paris: Dalloz, 2009) 1015–31
Sweeney, A.Margins of Appreciation: Cultural Relativity and the European Court of Human Rights in the Post-Cold War Era’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 54 (2005) 459–74
Tehindrazanarivelo, D.L. ‘Targeted Sanctions and Obligations of States on Listing and De-listing Procedures’, in Boisson de Chazournes and Kohen (eds.), Liber Amicorum Vera Gowlland-Debbas 127–71
Terris, D.et al. The International Judge: An Introduction to the Men and Women Who decide the World's Cases (International Courts and Tribunal Series, Oxford University Press, 2007)
Thallinger, G.Sense and Sensibility of the Human Rights Obligations of the United Nations Security Council’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 67 (2007) 1015–40
Tomuschat, C.Case Law Comment’, Common Market Law Review 43 (2006) 537–51
Tomuschat, C.Die staatsrechtliche Entscheidung für die internationale Offenheit’, J. Isensee and P. Kirchhoff (eds.), Handbuch des Staatsrechts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Vol. VII (Heidelberg: C. F. Müller, 1992) 483–524
Tomuschat, C.Human Rights Between Idealism and Realism, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2008)
Tomuschat, C.Human Rights in a Multi-Level System of Governance and the Internment of Suspected Terrorists’, Melbourne Journal of International Law 9 (2008) 391–404
Tomuschat, C.The Effects of the Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights According to the German Constitutional Court’, German Law Journal 11 (2006) 513–26
Tomuschat, C.The Kadi Case: What Relationship is there between the Universal Legal Order under the Auspices of the United Nations and the EU Legal Order?’, Yearbook of European Law 28 (2009) 654–63
Torres Pérez, A.Conflicts of Rights in the European Union: A Theory of Supranational Adjudication (Oxford University Press, 2009)
Tridimas, T. and Gutierrez-Fons, J.A.EU Law, International Law, and Economic Sanctions against Terrorism: The Judiciary in Distress?’, Fordham International Law Journal 32 (2008–9) 660–730
Tsakyrakis, S.Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights?’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 7:3 (2009) 468–93
Tsakyrakis, S.Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights?: A Rejoinder to Madhav Khosla’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 8:2 (2010) 307–10
Tulkens, F.The European Convention on Human Rights between International Law and Constitutional Law’, in ECtHR (ed.), Dialogue between Judges (Strassbourg: Council of Europe, 2007) 8–15
Tulkens, F.and DonnayL.L'usage de la marge d'appréciation par la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme. Paravent juridique superflu ou mécanisme indispensable par nature?’, Revue de science criminelle et de droit pénal comparé 1 (2006) 3–23
Tzanakopoulos, A.United Nations in Domestic Courts: From Interpretation to Defiance in Abdelrazik v. Canada’, Journal of International Criminal Justice 8 (2010) 249–67
Tzevelekos, V.P.The Use of Article 31(3)(c) of the VCLT in the Case Law of the ECtHR: An Effective Anti-Fragmentation Tool for the Reinforcement of Human Rights Teleology? Between Evolution and Systemic Integration’, Michigan Journal of International Law 31 (2010) 621–90
Ulfstein, G.International Constitutionalization: A Research Agenda’, Guest Editorial, ESIL Newsletter (2010)
Ulfstein, G.The International Judiciary’, in J. Klabbers, G. Ulfstein and A. Peters (eds.), The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2009) 126–52
van Drooghenbroeck, S.La proportionnalité dans le droit de la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme – Prendre l'idée simple au sérieux (Brussels: Bruylant, 2001)
Vitruk, N.V.O nekotorykh osobennostyakh ispol'zovaniya resheniy Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka v. pratike Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Fedreratsii i inykh sudov’, Sravnitel'noe konsituttsionnoe obozrenie, 1 (2006)
Voeten, E. ‘Politics, Judicial Behavior, and Institutional Design’, in Christoffersen and Madsen (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics, 61–76
Voeten, E.The Impartiality of International Judges: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights’, American Political Science Review 102:4 (2008) 417–33
von Bernstorff, J.Kerngehalte im Grund- und Menschenrechtsschutz (Berlin: Duncker und Humboldt, 2012)
von Bogdandy, A.On the Democratic Legitimation of International Judicial Lawmaking’, German Law Journal 12 (2011) 1341–70
von Bogdandy, A.Pluralism, Direct Effect, and the Ultimate Say: On the Relationship between International and Domestic Constitutional Law’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 6 (2008) 397–413
von Bogdandy, A.Prinzipien der Rechtsfortbildung im europäischen Rechtsraum: Überlegungen zum Lissabon-Urteil des BVerfGE’, Neue Juristische Wochenzeitung 63:1 (2010) 1–5
von Bogdandy, A.and Venzke, I.International Judicial Institutions as Lawmakers’, German Law Journal 12:5 (2011) 979–1004
von Staden, A.The Democratic Legitimacy of Judicial Review Beyond the State: Normative Subsidiarity and Judicial Standards of Review’, Jean-Monnet Working Paper 10/11 (2011)
Voßkuhle, A.Europa als Gegenstand wissenschaftlicher Reflexion – eine thematische Annäherung in 12 Thesen’, C. Franziuset al. (eds.), Strukturfragen der Europäischen Union (Baden-Baden: Nomos 2011) 37–45
Voßkuhle, A.Multilevel Cooperation of the European Constitutional Courts: Der Europäische Verfassungsgerichtsverbund’, European Constitutional Law Review 6 (2010) 175–98
Voyiakis, A.International Law and the Objectivity of Value’, Leiden Journal of International Law 22:1 (2009) 51–78
Wagner, A. ‘Bill of Rights Commission publishes advice (and squabbles) on European Court of Human Rights reform’, UK Human Rights Blog (9 September 2011)
Waldock, H.The Effectiveness of the System set up by the European Convention on Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Journal 1 (1980) 1–12
Waldron, J.Judges as Moral Reasoners’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 7 (2009) 2–24
Waldron, J.The Core of the Case against Judicial Review’, Yale Law Journal 115 (2006) 1346–1406
Weiler, J.H.H.Un' Europa Cristiana: Un saggio esplorativo (Saggi: BUR, 2003)
Weiler, J.H.H.Editorial’, European Journal of International Law 21:1 (2010) 1–6
Wheatley, S.Minorities under the ECHR and the Construction of a “Democratic Society”, Public Law (2007) 770–92
White, R. and Ovey, R.The European Convention on Human Rights, 5th edn (Oxford University Press, 2010)
Wieacker, F.Geschichtliche Wurzeln des Prinzips der verhältnismäßigen Anwendung’, M. Lutter, W. Simpel and H. Wiedemann (eds.), Festschrift für Robert Fischer (Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1997) 867–81
Wildhaber, L.A Constitutional Future for the European Court of Human Rights?’, Human Rights Law Journal 23:5/7 (2002) [N.P. Engel] 161–5
Wildhaber, L.Europäischer Grundrechtsschutz aus der Sicht des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte’, Europäische Grundrechtezeitschrift (2005) 689–92
Wildhaber, L. ‘Rethinking the European Court of Human Rights’, in Christoffersen and Madsen (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics, 204–29
Wildhaber, L.The European Court of Human Rights in Action’, Ritsumeikan Law Review 83 (2004) 83–92
Winkler, S.Der Beitritt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften zur Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2000)
Worster, W.T.Competition and Comity in the Fragmentation of International Law’, Brooklyn Journal of International Law 34:1 (2008) 119–49
Young, K.A.The Law and Process of the U.N. Human Rights Committee (The Procedural Aspects of International Law Monograph Series) (Ardsley, New York: Transnational Publishers, 2002)
Yourow, H.C.The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Dynamics of European Human Rights Jurisprudence (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1996)
Zappalà, S. ‘Reviewing Security Council Measures in the Light of International Human Rights Principles’, in Fassbender (ed.), Securing Human Rights? Achievements and Challenges of the UN Security Council, 172–94
Zaum, D., ‘The Security Council, the General Assembly, and War: The Uniting for Peace Resolution’, in V. Loweet al. (eds.), The United Nations Security Council and War (Oxford University Press, 2008) 154–74
Zimnenko, B.L.Mezhdunarodnoe pravo in pravovaya sistema Rossiyskoy Federatsii (Moscow: Statut, 2006)