Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law - Series page

pp ii-iv

Constitutional Dialogue - Title page

pp v-v

Copyright page

pp vi-vi

Contents

pp vii-viii

Contributors

pp ix-x

Preface and Acknowledgements

pp xi-xi

Note on the Cover Image

pp xii-xiv

1 - Introduction

pp 1-32

Part I - Dialogue and Democracy

pp 33-126

2 - Dialogue and Its Myths

pp 35-67

3 - Departmentalism and Dialogue

pp 68-84

4 - On Dialogue and Domination

pp 85-126

Part II - Dialogue and Institutions

pp 127-206

5 - Past, Present, and Justice in the Exercise of Judicial Responsibility

pp 129-160

6 - Constitutional ‘Dialogue’ and Deference

pp 161-185

7 - Dialogue, Finality and Legality

pp 186-206

Part III - Dialogue and Rights

pp 207-334

8 - Canada’s Notwithstanding Clause, Dialogue, and Constitutional Identities

pp 209-234

9 - Intra-Parliamentary Dialogues in New Zealand and the United Kingdom

pp 235-266

10 - Dialogue in Canada and the Dangers of Simplified Comparative Law and Populism

pp 267-307

11 - Bills of Rights with Strings Attached

pp 308-334

Part IV - Case Studies of Dialogue

pp 335-420

12 - Prisoners’ Voting and Judges’ Powers

pp 337-363

13 - ‘All’s Well That Ends Well?’

pp 364-396

14 - A Feature, Not a Bug

pp 397-420

Part V - International and Transnational Dialogues

pp 421-465

15 - Dialogue and Its Discontents

pp 423-435

16 - Constitutional Conversations in Britain (in Europe)

pp 436-465

Index

pp 466-472