References
Ashford, E. (2003). The demandingness of Scanlon’s contractualism. Ethics, 113(2), 273–302.
Bentham, J. (1789/1996). Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, ed. by Burns, J. H. and Hart, H. L. A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blackburn, S. (1999). Am I right? New York Times, 21 February.
Brand-Ballard, J. (2004). Contractualism and deontic restrictions. Ethics, 114(2), 269–300.
Bratman, M. (1987). Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brown, C. (2011). Consequentialize this. Ethics, 121(4), 749–71.
Carlyle, T. (1850/1885). Jesuitism. In Carlyle, T, Latter-Day Pamphlets. New York: John B. Alden, pp. 272–313.
Chang, R. (1997). Introduction. In Chang, R, ed., Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 1–34.
Dancy, J. (2004). Ethics without Principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Doggett, T. (2009). What is wrong with Kamm and Scanlon’s arguments against Taurek. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 3(3), 1–15.
Dreier, J. (1993). Structures of normative theories. The Monist, 76(1), 22–40.
Dreier, J. (2011). In defence of consequentializing. Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, 1, 97–119.
Foot, P. (1994). Rationality and virtue. In Pauer-Studer, H, ed., Norms, Values and Society. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 205–16.
Frick, J. (2015). Contractualism and social risk. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 43(3), 175–223.
Fried, B. (2012). Can contractualism save us from aggregation? Journal of Ethics, 16(1), 39–66.
Gauthier, D. (1986). Morals by Agreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harsanyi, J. (1975). Can the maximin principle serve as a basis for morality? A critique of John Rawls’s theory. The American Political Science Review, 69(2), 594–606.
Hieronymi, P. (2011). Of metaethics and motivation: the appeal of contractualism. In Wallace, R. J., Kumar, R and Freeman, R, eds., Reasons and Recognition – Essays on the Philosophy of T.M. Scanlon. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 101–28.
Hills, A. (2010). Utilitarianism, contractualism and demandingness. The Philosophical Quarterly, 60(239), 225–242.
Hobbes, T. (1651/1996). The Leviathan, ed. by Tuck, R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holm, S. (2018). The luckless and the doomed. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 21(2), 231–44.
Hooker, B. (2000). Ideal Code, Real World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hooker, B. (2003). Contractualism, spare wheel, aggregation. In Matravers, M, ed., Scanlon and Contractualism. London: Frank Cass, pp. 53–76.
James, A. (2012). Contractualism’s (not so) slippery slope. Legal Theory, 18(3), 263–92.
Kamm, F.M. (2007). Intricate Ethics: Rights, Responsibilities, and Permissible Harm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kiesewetter, B. (2017). The Normativity of Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kumar, R. (2015). Risking and wronging. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 43(1), 27–43.
Kymlicka, W. (1990). Two theories of justice. Inquiry, 33(1), 99–119.
Lenman, J. (2006). Compatibilism and contractualism: the possibility of moral responsibility. Ethics, 117(1), 7–31.
Locke, J. (1689/2002). Two Treatises of Government, ed. by Laslett, P. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Louise, J. (2004). Relative value and the consequentialist umbrella. Philosophical Quarterly, 54(217), 518–36.
McCloskey, H. J. (1965). A non-utilitarian approach to punishment. Inquiry, 8(1–4), 249–263.
McGinn, C. (1999). Reasons and unreasons. The New Republic, May 24, 34–8.
Mendus, S. (2003). The magic of the pronoun ‘my’. In Matravers, M, ed., Scanlon and Contractualism. London: Frank Cass, pp. 33–52.
Mill, J. S. (1861/1998). Utilitarianism, ed. by Crisp, R. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moehler, M. (2020). Contractarianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moore, G. E. (1903). Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mulgan, T. (2006). Future People. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Norcross, A. (2002). Contractualism and aggregation. Social Theory and Practice, 28(2), 303–14.
Nussbaum, M. (2006). Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Otsuka, M. (2000). Scanlon and the claims of the many versus the one. Analysis, 60(3), 288–93.
Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Parfit, D. (2003). Justifiability to each person. Ratio, 16(4), 368–90.
Parfit, D. (2011). On What Matters, Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pettit, P. (2000). A consequentialist perspective on contractualism. Theoria, 66(3), 228–45.
Phillips, D. (1998). Contractualism and moral status. Social Theory and Practice, 24(2), 183–204.
Plato, (c. 380 BC/2000). Republic, ed. by Ferrari, G. R. F, trans. by Griffin, T. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Portmore, D. (2007). Consequentializing moral theories. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 88(1), 39–73.
Portmore, D. (2009). Consequentializing. Philosophy Compass, 4(2), 329–47.
Portmore, D. (2011). Commonsense Consequentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Prichard, H. A. (1912). Does moral philosophy rest on a mistake? Mind, 21(81), 21–37.
Rawls, J. (1972). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Raz, J. (1986). The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Raz, J. (2003). Numbers, with and without aggregation. Ratio, 16(4), 346–67.
Reibetanz, S. (1998). Contractualism and aggregation. Ethics, 108(2), 296–311.
Ridge, M. (2001). Saving Scanlon: contractualism and agent-relativity. Journal of Political Philosophy, 9(4), 472–481.
Ridge, M. (2006). Introducing variable-rate rule-utilitarianism. Philosophical Quarterly, 56(223), 242–256.
Rosen, G. (2009). Might Kantian contractualism be the supreme principle of morality? Ratio, 22(1), 78–97.
Ross, W. D. (1930/2002). The Right and the Good, ed. by Stratton-Lake, P. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rousseau, J.-J. (1762/1997). The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, ed. by Gourevitch, V. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scanlon, T. M. (1982). Contractualism and utilitarianism. In Sen, A and Williams, B, eds., Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 103–28.
Scanlon, T. M. (1998). What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Scanlon, T. M. (2004). Replies. In Stratton-Lake, P, ed., On What We Owe to Each Other. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 123–38.
Scanlon, T. M. (2008). Moral Dimensions: Permissibility, Meaning, Blame. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Scanlon, T. M. (2013). Reply to Zofia Stemplowska. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 10(4), 508–14.
Scheffler, S. (1982). The Rejection of Consequentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schroeder, M. (2005). Realism and reduction: the quest for robustness. Philosophers’ Imprint, 5(1), 1–18.
Schroeder, M. (2007). Teleology, agent-relative value and ‘good’. Ethics, 117(2), 265–95.
Sheinman, H. (2011). Act and principle contractualism. Utilitas, 23(3), 288–315.
Singer, P. (1972). Famine, affluence and morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1(3), 229–243.
Slote, M. (1982). Satisficing consequentialism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, suppl. 58, 139–64.
Smith, H. (2001). Deriving morality from rationality. In Vallentyne, P, ed., Contractarianism and Rational Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 229–53.
Smith, H. (2010). Measuring the consequences of rules. Utilitas, 22(4), 413–33.
Smith, M. (2003). Neutral and relative value after Moore. Ethics, 113(3), 576–98.
Smith, M. (2009). Two kinds of consequentialism. Philosophical Issues, 19, 257–72.
Southwood, N. (2009). Moral contractualism. Philosophy Compass, 4(6), 926–36.
Southwood, N. (2010). Contractualism and the Foundations of Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Southwood, N. (2019). Contractualism for us as we are. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 99(3), 529–47.
Stratton-Lake, P. (2003). Scanlon’s contractualism and the redundancy objection. Analysis, 63(1), 70–6.
Streumer, B. (2007). Reasons and impossibility. Philosophical Studies, 136(3), 351–84.
Suikkanen, J. (2004). What we owe to many. Social Theory and Justice, 30(4), 485–506.
Suikkanen, J. (2005). Contractualist responses to the redundancy objection. Theoria, 71(1), 38–58.
Suikkanen, J. (2009). Consequentialism, constraints and the good-relative-to: a reply to Mark Schroeder. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 3(1), 1–8.
Suikkanen, J. (2014a). Consequentialist options. Utilitas, 26(3), 277–301.
Suikkanen, J. (2014b). Contractualism and the conditional fallacy. Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, 4, 113–37.
Suikkanen, J. (2014c). Contractualism and climate change. In Di Paola, M and Pellegrino, G, eds., Canned Heat: Ethics and Politics of Climate Change. London: Routledge, 115–28.
Suikkanen, J. (2017). Contractualism and the counter-culture challenge. Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, 7, 184–206.
Suikkanen, J. (2019). Ex ante and ex post contractualism: a synthesis. Journal of Ethics, 23(1), 77–98.
Thomson, J. J. (1976). Killing, letting die and the trolley problem. The Monist, 59(2), 204–17.
Thomson, J. J. (1990). The Realm of Rights, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Timmermann, J. (2004). The individualist lottery: how people count, but not their numbers. Analysis, 64(2), 106–112.
Timmons, M. (2003). The limits of moral constructivism. Ratio, 16(4), 391–423.
Urmson, J. O. (1953). The interpretation of the moral philosophy of J.S. Mill. The Philosophical Quarterly 3(10), 33–9.
Vallentyne, P. (1989). Two types of moral dilemmas. Erkenntnis, 30(3), 301–18.
Vallentyne, P. (2006). Against maximizing act-consequentialism. In Dreier, J, ed., Contemporary Debates in Moral Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 21–37.
Väyrynen, P. (2013). Grounding and normative explanation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, suppl. 87, 155–78.
Wallace, R. J. (2002). Scanlon’s contractualism. Ethics, 112(3), 429–70.
Wallace, R. J. (2019). The Moral Nexus. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
