Skip to main content
×
Home
Debating Humanity
  • Access
  • Open access

Book description

Debating Humanity explores sociological and philosophical efforts to delineate key features of humanity that identify us as members of the human species. After challenging the normative contradictions of contemporary posthumanism, this book goes back to the foundational debate on humanism between Jean-Paul Sartre and Martin Heidegger in the 1940s and then re-assesses the implicit and explicit anthropological arguments put forward by seven leading postwar theorists: self-transcendence (Hannah Arendt), adaptation (Talcott Parsons), responsibility (Hans Jonas), language (Jürgen Habermas), strong evaluations (Charles Taylor), reflexivity (Margaret Archer) and reproduction of life (Luc Boltanski). Genuinely interdisciplinary and boldly argued, Daniel Chernilo has crafted a novel philosophical sociology that defends a universalistic principle of humanity as vital to any adequate understanding of social life.

Reviews

‘This is a major work on the relationship between sociology and philosophy. It provides a thorough and insightful analysis into the meaning of the notion of humanity.'

Gerard Delanty - University of Sussex

‘Chernilo's pathbreaking new book can be read as a most fruitful introduction to social philosophy, but it is much more than that: it re-invents the tradition of a philosophical sociology, thus bringing together the best of both worlds in a rigorous reflection of their anthropological underpinnings.'

Hartmut Rosa - Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Jena, Germany and Max Weber Center for Advanced Cultural and Social Studies, Germany

‘Debating Humanity cuts across the grain of mainstream sociology, if not the social sciences as a whole, in proposing that sociology cannot ignore philosophy if it is to engage effectively in normative argument. Critical of the positivistic, narrow and inward-looking character of much contemporary sociology, Daniel Chernilo returns to earlier debates with philosophical anthropology in order to ground his advocacy of a normative and philosophical sociology by paying attention to the universalistic features of human life over and against sociology's obsession with the particularities of gender, race, and ethnicity. A triumph in terms of the challenge and the clarity of his vision.'

Bryan S. Turner - The Graduate Center City University of New York, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, and Universität Potsdam, Germany

‘Daniel Chernilo, one of the more interesting social theorists emerging from Britain today, lays the foundation for a field he calls ‘philosophical sociology', which aims for nothing less than a reorientation of social theory towards the twenty-first century. In these pages we catch a glimpse of someone who would recover a scope for sociology last seen in the writings of Max Scheler.'

Steve Fuller - Auguste Comte Chair in Social Epistemology, University of Warwick

    • Aa
    • Aa
Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send:
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.


A. Abbas and M. McLean (2003) ‘Communicative competence and the improvement of university teaching: Insights from the field’, British Journal of Sociology of Education 24 (1): 6982.

M. S. Archer (1991) ‘Presidential address. Sociology for one world: Unity and diversity’, International Sociology 6 (2): 131–47.

M. S. Archer (1995) Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach, Cambridge University Press.

M. S. Archer (2000) Being human: The problem of agency, Cambridge University Press.

M. S. Archer (2003) Structure, agency and the internal conversation, Cambridge University Press.

M. S. Archer (2007) Making our way through the world: Human reflexivity and social mobility, Cambridge University Press.

M. S. Archer (2012) The reflexive imperative in late modernity, Cambridge University Press.

H. Arendt (1998) The human condition, University of Chicago Press.

N. Badmington (ed.) (2000) Posthumanism, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

P. Baehr (2002) ‘Identifying the unprecedented: Hannah Arendt, totalitarianism, and the critique of sociology’, American Sociological Review 67 (6): 804–31.

P. Baehr (2010) Hannah Arendt, totalitarianism and the social sciences, California: Stanford University Press.

P. Baehr (2012) ‘Debating totalitarianism: An exchange of letters between Hannah Arendt and Eric Voegelin’, History and Theory 51 (3): 364–80.

J. A. Barash (1998) ‘The sense of history: On the political implications of Karl Löwith’s concept of secularization’, History & Theory 37 (1): 6975.

M. Basaure (2011) ‘In the epicenter of politics: Axel Honneth’s theory of the struggles for recognition and Luc Boltanski and Laurent Thévenot’s moral and political sociology’, European Journal of Social Theory 14 (3): 263–81.

J. Beemer (2006) ‘Breaching the theoretical divide: Reassessing the ordinary and everyday in Habermas and Garfinkel’, Sociological Theory 24 (1): 81104.

O. Bissell , J. M. Traulsen and L. S. Haugbolle (2002) ‘An introduction to functionalist sociology: Talcott Parsons’ concept of the “sick role”’, International Journal of Pharmacy Practice 10 (1): 60–8.

L. Boltanski and L. Thévenot (1999) ‘The sociology of critical capacity’, European Journal of Social Theory 2 (3): 359–77.

C. Browne (2014a) ‘“Experience is a mixture of violence and justification”: Luc Boltanski in conversation with Craig Browne’, Thesis Eleven 124 (1): 719.

C. Browne (2014b) ‘The institution of critique and the critique of institutions’, Thesis Eleven 124 (1): 2052.

H. Brunkhorst (2014) ‘Revolutionary constitutions: Arendt’s inversions of Heidegger’, European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 1 (3): 283–98.

J. C. Burnham (2014) ‘Why sociologists abandoned the sick role concept’, History of the Human Sciences 27 (1): 7087.

A. Caetano (2015) ‘Defining personal reflexivity: A critical reading of Archer’s approach’, European Journal of Social Theory 18 (1): 6075.

R. Celikates (2006) ‘From critical social theory to a social theory of critique: On the critique of ideology after the pragmatic turn’, Constellations 13 (1): 2140.

D. Chernilo (2002) ‘The theorisation of social co-ordinations in differentiated societies. The theory of generalised symbolic media in Parsons, Luhmann and Habermas’, British Journal of Sociology 53 (3): 431–49.

D. Chernilo (2012b) ‘Cosmopolitanism in social theory: An ambivalent defence’, in A. Krossa and R. Robertson (eds.), European cosmopolitanism in question, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

D. Chernilo (2013a) The natural law foundations of modern social theory: A quest for universalism, Cambridge University Press.

D. Chernilo (2013b) ‘Jürgen Habermas: Modern social theory as postmetaphysical natural law’, Journal of Classical Sociology 13 (2): 254–73.

D. Chernilo (2014) ‘The idea of philosophical sociology’, British Journal of Sociology 65 (2): 338–57.

241 D. Chernilo (2017) ‘the question of the human in the Anthropocene debate’, European Journal of Social Theory 20 (1): 4460.

A. Clark (2001) Mindware: An introduction to the philosophy of cognitive science, Oxford University Press.

A. Clark (2003) Natural born cyborgs: Minds, technologies and the future of human intelligence, Oxford University Press.

A. Clark (2008) Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action and cognitive extension, Oxford University Press.

A. Clark and D. Chalmers (2008) ‘The extended mind’, in A. Clark Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action and cognitive extension, Oxford University Press.

W. Connolly (2004) ‘Catholicism and philosophy: A nontheistic appreciation’, in R. Abbey (ed.), Charles Taylor, Cambridge University Press.

M. Cooke (1993) ‘Habermas and consensus’, European Journal of Philosophy 1 (3): 247–67.

R. Cordero (2014a) ‘It happens in-between: On the spatial birth of politics in Arendt’s On revolution’, European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 1 (3): 249–65.

R. Cordero (2014b) ‘Crisis and critique in Jürgen Habermas’s social theory’, European Journal of Social Theory 17(4): 497515.

R. Dahrendorf (1958) ‘Out of utopia: Towards a reorientation of sociological analysis’, American Journal of Sociology 64 (2): 115–27.

F. Depeltau (2008) ‘Relational thinking: A critique of co-deterministic theories of structure and agency’, Sociological Theory 26 (1): 5173.

B. Diken (2015) ‘Critique as justification – and beyond’, Sociological Review 63 (4): 922–39.

H. L. Dreyfus (2004) ‘Taylor’s (anti-)epistemology’, in R. Abbey (ed.), Charles Taylor, Cambridge University Press.

E. Durkheim (1982) The rules of sociological method, New York: Free Press.

D. Elder-Vass (2007) ‘Reconciling Archer and Bourdieu in an emergentist theory of action’, Sociological Theory 25 (4): 325–46.

D. Elder-Vass (2010) The causal powers of social structures: Emergence, structure and agency, Cambridge University Press.

A. Ferrara (1987) ‘A critique of Habermas’s consensus theory of truth’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 13 (1): 3967.

243 R. Fine (2008) ‘Judgment and the reification of the faculties. A reconstructive reading of Arendt’s Life of the mind’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 34 (1–2): 157–76.

R. Fine (2014) ‘Re-reading Arendt’s On revolution: On the dialectics of the modern revolutionary tradition’, European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 1 (3): 219–33.

A. Frank (2013) ‘From sick role to practices of health and illness’, Medical Education 47: 1825.

S. Fuller (2011) Humanity 2.0: What it means to be human past, present and future, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

S. Gangas (2014) ‘From alienation to capability deprivation: Reconstructing a sociological concept’, Social Science Information 53 (1): 5475.

S. Gangas (2016) ‘From agency to capabilities: Sen and sociological theory’, Current Sociology 64 (1): 2240.

U. Gerhardt (1989) Ideas about illness: An intellectual and political history of medical sociology, London: Macmillan.

U. Gerhardt (2002) Talcott Parsons. An intellectual biography, Cambridge University Press.

E. Grassi (1988) ‘The rehabilitation of rhetorical humanism regarding Heidegger’s anti-humanism’, Diogenes 36 (142) 136–56.

A. Gronow (2008) ‘The over- or the undersocialized conception of man? Practice theory and the problem of intersubjectivity’, Sociology 42 (2): 243–59.

M. Guggenheim and J. Potthast (2012) ‘Symmetrical twins: On the relationship between actor–network theory and the sociology of critical capacities’, European Journal of Social Theory 15 (2): 157–78.

J. Habermas (1976) ‘Some distinctions in universal pragmatics. A working paper’, Theory and Society 3(2): 155–67.

J. Habermas (1995) ‘Reconciliation through the public use of reason: Remarks on John Rawls’s political liberalism’, Journal of Philosophy 92 (3): 109–31.

J. Habermas (2010) ‘The concept of human dignity and the realistic utopia of human rights’, Metaphilosophy 41 (4): 464–80.

G. Hayim (1992) ‘Naturalism and the crisis of rationalism in Habermas’, Social Theory and Practice 18 (2): 182209.

K. N. Hayles (1999) How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies, cybernetics, literature and informatics, University of Chicago Press.

T. Hochstrasser (2000) Natural law theories in the early enlightenment, Cambridge University Press.

M. Hollis (1977) Models of man. Philosophical thoughts on human action, Cambridge University Press.

A. Honneth (2010) ‘Dissolutions of the social: On the social theory of Luc Boltanski and Laurent Thévenot’, Constellations 17 (3): 376–89.

D. Ingram (1993) ‘The limits and possibilities of communicative ethics for democratic theory’, Political Theory 21 (2): 294321.

M. Kelly (1988) ‘The Gadamer/Habermas debate revisited: The question of ethics’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 14 (3–4): 369–89.

F. Kerr (2004) ‘The self and the good: Taylor’s moral ontology’, in R Abbey . (ed.), Charles Taylor, Cambridge University Press.

A. King (1999) ‘Against structure: A critique of morphogenetic social theory’, Sociological Review 47 (2): 199227.

C. Lafont (2004) ‘Moral objectivity and reasonable agreement: Can realism be reconciled with constructivism?’, Ratio Juris 17 (1): 2751.

A. Laitinen (2008) Strong evaluations without moral sources: On Charles Taylor’s philosophical anthropology and ethics, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

B. Latour (2004) ‘Whose cosmos, which cosmopolitics? Comments on the peace terms of Ulrich Beck’, Common Knowledge 10 (3): 450462.

B. Lazier (2003) ‘Overcoming Gnosticism: Hans Jonas, Hans Blumenberg and the legitimacy of the natural world’, Journal of the History of Ideas 64 (4): 619–37.

K. Löwith (1970) ‘The nature of man and the world of nature for Heidegger’s 80th birthday’, Southern Journal of Philosophy, 8 (4): 309–18.

N. Luhmann (1994) ‘“What is the case?” and “what lies behind it?” The two sociologies and the theory of society’, Sociological Theory 12(2): 126–39.

T. McCarthy (1973) ‘A theory of communicative competence’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 3 (1): 135–56.

A. Mascareño and D. Chernilo (2009) ‘Obstacles and perspectives of Latin American sociology: Normative universalism and functional differentiation’, Soziale Systeme 15 (1): 7296.

D. Misgeld (1977) ‘Discourse and conversation: The theory of communicative competence and hermeneutics in the light of the debate between Habermas and Gadamer’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 4 (4): 321–44.

J. D. Moon (1995) ‘Practical discourse and communicative ethics’, in S. K. White (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Habermas, Cambridge University Press.

N. Mouzelis (1974) ‘Social and system integration: some reflections on a fundamental distinction’, British Journal of Sociology 25 (4): 395409.

N. Mouzelis (1992) ‘Social and system integration: Habermas’ view, British Journal of Sociology 43 (2): 267–88.

N. Mouzelis (1999) ‘Modernity: A non-European conceptualization’, British Journal of Sociology 50 (1): 141–59.

M. Nussbaum (1992) ‘Human functioning and social justice: In defense of Aristotelian essentialism’, Political Theory 20 (2): 202–46.

R. B. Owens (2010) ‘Producing Parsons’ reputation: Early critiques of Talcott Parsons’ social theory and the making of a caricature’, Journal of the History of Behavioral Sciences 46 (2): 165–88.

M. Papastephanou (1997) ‘Communicative action and philosophical foundationalism: Comments on the Apel–Habermas debate’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 23 (4): 4169.

T. Parsons (1964a) ‘Evolutionary universals in society’, American Sociological Review 29 (3): 339–57.

T. Parsons and J. Platt (1973) The American university, New York: Free Press.

J. Pedersen (2008) ‘Habermas’ method: Rational reconstruction’, Philosophy of the social sciences 38 (4): 457–85.

T. Piiroinen (2014) ‘For “central conflation”: A critique of Archerian dualism’, Sociological Theory 32 (2): 7999.

J. Rawls (1995) ‘Political liberalism: A reply to Habermas’, Journal of Philosophy 92 (3): 132–80.

G. Ritzer (1988) ‘Sociological metatheory: A defense of a subfield by a delineation of its parameters’, Sociological Theory 6(2): 187200.

T. Rockmore (1995) Heidegger and French philosophy: Humanism, antihumanism and being, London: Routledge.

R. Rorty (1994) ‘Taylor on truth’, in J. Tully (ed.), Philosophy in the age of pluralism, Cambridge University Press.

H. Rosa (1998) ‘On defining the good life: liberal freedom and capitalist necessity’, Constellations 5 (2): 201–14.

A. Sayer (2011) Why things matter to people: Social science, values and ethical life, Cambridge University Press.

C. Schilling (2002) ‘Culture, the “sick role” and the consumption of health’, British Journal of Sociology, 53 (4): 621638.

A. Seemann (2004) ‘Lifeworld, discourse and realism: On Jürgen Habermas’s theory of truth’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (4): 503–14.

G. Simmel (1949) ‘The sociology of sociability’, American Journal of Sociology 55 (3): 254–61.

P. Sloterdijk (2009) ‘Rules for the human zoo: A response to the letter on humanism’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 27: 1228.

H. Sluga (1993) Heidegger’s crisis. Philosophy and politics in Nazi Germany, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

A. Smith (2009) The theory of moral sentiments, London: Penguin.

N. Smith (2004) ‘Taylor and the hermeneutic tradition’, in R. Abbey (ed.), Charles Taylor, Cambridge University Press.

R. Stones (2005) Structuration theory, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

C. Taylor (1985a) Human agency and language: Philosophical papers 1, Cambridge University Press.

C. Taylor (1985b) Philosophy and the human sciences: Philosophical papers 2, Cambridge University Press.

C. Taylor (1995a) Philosophical arguments, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

S. Timmermans and S. Haas (2008) ‘Towards a sociology of disease’, Sociology of Health and Illness 30 (5): 659–76.

F. Vandenberghe (2005) ‘The Archers. A tale of folk (final episode?)’, European Journal of Social Theory 8 (2): 227–37.

M. Z. Varul (2010) ‘Talcott Parsons, the sick role and chronic illness’, Body and Society 16 (2): 7294.

E. Voegelin (1962) ‘World-empire and the unity of mankind’, International Affairs 38 (2): 170–88.

P. Wagner (1999) ‘After justification: Repertoires of evaluation and the sociology of modernity’, European Journal of Social Theory 2 (3): 341–57.

S. Walby , J. Armstrong and S. Stird (2012) ‘Intersectionality: Multiple inequalities in social theory’, Sociology 46 (2): 224–40.

M. E. Warren (1995) ‘The self in discursive democracy’, in S. K. White (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Habermas, Cambridge University Press.

S. K. White and E. R. Farr (2012) ‘“No-saying” in Habermas’, Political Theory 40 (1): 3257.

E. O. Wilson (1978) On human nature, London: Penguin.

G. Wolters (2001) ‘Hans Jonas’ philosophical biology’, Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 23 (1): 8598.

N. Yuval-Davis (2006) ‘Intersectionality and feminist politics’, European Journal of Women’s Studies 13 (3): 193209.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 23
Total number of PDF views: 991 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 72 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 7th June 2017 - 23rd June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.