Skip to main content Accessibility help
Degrees of Democracy
  • Cited by 50
  • 32.99 (USD)
    Digital access
    (PDF download and/or read online)
    Add to cart
    Added to cart
    Digital access
    (PDF download and/or read online)
    View cart
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian

Book description

This book develops and tests a 'thermostatic' model of public opinion and policy. The representation of opinion in policy is central to democratic theory and everyday politics. So too is the extent to which public preferences are informed and responsive to changes in policy. The coexistence of both 'public responsiveness' and 'policy representation' is thus a defining characteristic of successful democratic governance, and the subject of this book. The authors examine both responsiveness and representation across a range of policy domains in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada. The story that emerges is one in which representative democratic government functions surprisingly well, though there are important differences in the details. Variations in public responsiveness and policy representation responsiveness are found to reflect the 'salience' of the different domains and governing institutions - specifically, presidentialism (versus parliamentarism) and federalism (versus unitary government).


'This extraordinary book sets out to describe and test a mechanism by which government policy might respond to changes in the preferences of citizens, and citizens might adjust their preferences in light of the policies that governments enact. In the process it investigates the preconditions for efficient working of representative democracy. The authors have meticulously collected the data needed to evaluate the efficiency of representation in three countries – the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom – and have devised rigorous tests that employ these data. The results not only tell us how democracy works but also how well it works in these three countries, providing major insights regarding the impact of institutional differences on representation processes.'

Mark Franklin - European University Institute

'In a major empirical and theoretical contribution to the study of representative government, Soroka and Wlezien study the complex linkages between public opinion and public policy in three western democracies. They add two critical components to the now classic thermostat model: differences among policy issues (more salient issues are more likely to receive policy responses), and institutions (different democratic political systems represent opinions differently). Based on their extensive empirical analyses, the result is a fresh understanding of the process of democratic representation. Because salience matters, agenda-setting politics matter. Because institutions matter, the manipulation of institutions by politicians matters. Degrees of Democracy is a huge breakthrough in producing a more integrated theory of democratic policymaking.'

Bryan D. Jones - University of Texas at Austin

'A wonderful book. Soroka and Wlezien provide a clear and forceful description of the influential ‘thermostatic’ model of public opinion, and demonstrate its analytical leverage in different national political contexts. There are many important implications for both empirical democratic theory and practice that all future scholarship in this area will have to consider.'

Jeff Manza - New York University

'With the current activist presidential administration in Washington, this is an especially timely and groundbreaking book that shows how the public can be counted upon to ‘get the message’ about increases and decreases in government spending, and to react in ways enable it to exert pressure to change course. Soroka and Wlezien persuasively argue how this is as an important an attribute of representative democracy as is government’s responsiveness to public opinion, since it shows that extant communications processes work and that the public as a whole – and all major subgroups of it – are sufficiently attentive to get the message. Moreover, the authors show how this plays out is affected by the defining characteristics of Anglo-American political systems and by the importance of the issues at stake, as perceived by their publics. Providing evidence for this is a major accomplishment: it demonstrates what political scientists can do given the historical data to do so, and it clears a path for others to study these attributes in democratic governments, both old and new, everywhere.'

Robert Shapiro - Columbia University

'Students of contemporary democracies frequently fret about all sorts of ways in which the will of the people is perverted and popular governance undermined. Soroka and Wlezien bring us important good news: democracy works. Degrees of Democracy carefully and systematically shows that public policy responds to popular preferences, but also that when governments push policy too far in a particular direction, voters adjust their demands and rein them in. Yet, policy responsiveness and representation are shaped by political institutions, and the authors’ comparisons of Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States highlight intriguing differences between these democracies. This is an ambitious and important book that deserves a broad audience.'

Kaare Strom - University of California, San Diego

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.


Abramowitz, A.I. 1994. “Issue Evolution Reconsidered: Racial Attitudes and Partisanship in the U.S. Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 38:1–24.
Abramson, Jeffrey B., Christopher Arterton, F. and Orren, Gary R.. 1988. The Electronic Commonwealth: The Impact of New Media Technologies on Democratic Politics. New York: Basic Books.
Achen, Christopher H. 1978. “Measuring Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 22:475–510.
Adams, James, Clark, Michael, Ezrow, Lawrence, and Glasgow, Garrett. 2006. “Are Niche Parties Fundamentally Different from Mainstream Parties? The Causes and the Electoral Consequences of Western European Parties' Policy Shifts 1996–1998.” American Journal of Political Science 50:513–529.
Almond, Gabriel. 1950. The American People and Foreign Policy. 2nd ed. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
Alt, James E. 1985. “Political Parties, World Demand, and Unemployment: Domestic and International Sources of Economic Activity.” American Political Science Review 79:1016–1040.
Althaus, Scott L. 2003. Collective Preferences in Democratic Politics: Opinion Surveys and the Will of the People. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Althaus, Scott L. 1998. “Information Effects in Collective Preferences.” American Political Science Review 92: 545–558.
Andersen, S.S., and Burns, T. 1996. “The European Union and the Erosion of Parliamentary Democracy: A Study of Post-Parliamentary Governance.” In Andersen, S.S. and Eliassen, K.A., eds. The European Union: How Democratic Is It?London: Sage.
Andersen, Robert, Tilley, James and Heath, Anthony F.. 2005. “Political Knowledge and Enlightened Preferences: Party Choice Through the Electoral Cycle.” British Journal of Political Science 35: 285–302.
Anderson, Cameron. 2006. “Economic Voting and Multilevel Governance: A Comparative Individual-level Analysis,” American Journal of Political Science 50(2):446–460.
Ansell, Christopher, and Gingrich, Jane. 2003. “Trends in Decentralization.” In Cain, Bruce E., Dalton, Russell J. and Scarrow, Susan E., eds. Democracy Transformed? Expanding Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies, pp. 140–163. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Arceneaux, Kevin. 2005. “Do Campaigns Help Voters Learn? A Cross-National Analysis.” British Journal of Political Science 36:159–173.
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1951. Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: Wiley.
Bagehot, Walter. 1867. The English Constitution. London: Fontana.
Bahl, Roy, and Wallace, Sally. 2005. “Public Financing in Developing and Transition Countries.” Public Budgeting & Finance 25(4s):83–98.
Barker, Ernest. “Burke and his Bristol Constituency,” in Essays on Government. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
Barnes, Samuel H. 1977. Representation in Italy: Institutionalized Tradition and Electoral Choice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bartels, Larry M. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bartels, Larry M. 2005. “Economic Inequality and Political Representation.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, September 2002. Revised August 2005.
Bartels, Larry M. 1993. “Messages Received: The Political Impact of Media Exposure.” American Political Science Review 87(2):267–285.
Bartels, Larry M. 1991. “Constituency Opinion and Congressional Policy Making: The Reagan Defense Build Up.” American Political Science Review 85(2):457–474.
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D.. 2002. “Positive and Negative Feedback in Politics,” In Baumgartner, Frank R. and Jones, Bryan D., eds. Policy Dynamics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bartels, Larry M. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Beitz, Charles. 1990. Political Equality: An Essay in Democratic Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bentham, Jeremy. 1989. First Principles Preparatory to the Constitutional Code, Schofield, Philip, ed. Oxford: Clarendon.
Berelson, Bernard R., Lazarsfeld, Paul F. and McPhee, William N.. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Berinsky, Adam J. 2004. Silent Voices: Public Opinion and Political Participation in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bianco, William T. 1994. Trust: Representatives and Constituents. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Birch, Anthony H. 2001. Concepts and Theories of Modern Democracy, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
Birch, Anthony H. 1971. Representation. New York: Praeger.
Blais, André, Blake, Donald and Dion, Stephane. 1996. “Do Parties Make a Difference? A Reappraisal.” American Journal of Political Science 40:514–520.
Blais, André, and Bodet, Marc André. 2006. “Does Proportional Representation Foster Closer Congruence Between Citizens and Policy Makers?Comparative Political Studies 39:1243–1262.
Blekesaune, Morten. 2007. “Economic Conditions and Public Attitudes to Welfare Policies.” European Sociological Review 23:393–403.
Brady, Henry E., and Johnston, Richard. 1987. “What's the Primary Message: Horse Race or Issue Journalism?” In Orren, Gary R. and Polsby, Nelson W., eds. Media and Momentum. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Brand, Jack. 1992. British Parliamentary Parties: Policy and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bratton, Kathleen A. and Haynie, Kerry L.. 1999. “Agenda Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures: The Effects of Gender and Race.” Journal of Politics 61:658–679.
Bratton, Kathleen A. and Ray, Leonard P.. 2002. “Descriptive Representation, Policy Outcomes, and Municipal Day-Care Coverage in Norway.” American Journal of Political Science 46(2):428–437.
Brehm, John. 1993. The Phantom Respondents: Opinion Surveys and Political Representation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Brody, Richard. 1991. Assessing the President: The Media, Elite Opinion, and Public Support. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Brooks, Clem. 2006. “Voters, Satisficing and Public Policymaking: Recent Directions in the Study of Electoral Politics.” Annual Review of Sociology 32:191–211.
Brooks, Clem, and Manza, Jeff. 2007. Why Welfare States Persist: Public Opinion and the Future of Social Provision. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Brooks, Clem, and Manza, Jeff. 2006. “Social Political Responsiveness in Developed Democracies.” American Sociological Review 71:474–494.
Brooks, Joel E. 1990. “The Opinion-Policy Nexus in Germany.” Public Opinion Quarterly 54:508–529.
Brooks, Joel E. 1987. “The Opinion-Policy Nexus in France – Do Institutions and Ideology Make a Difference?Journal of Politics 49:465–480.
Brooks, Joel E. 1985. “Democratic Frustration in the Anglo-American Polities: A Quantification of Inconsistency between Mass Public Opinion, and Public Policy.” Western Political Quarterly 38:250–261.
Budge, I., Robertson, D., and Hearl, D. eds. 1987. Ideology, Strategy and Party Change: Spatial Analyses of Post-War Election Programmes in 19 Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burstein, Paul. 2006. “Why Estimates of the Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy Are Too High,” Social Forces 84:2273–2290.
Burstein, Paul. 2003. “The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: A Review and an Agenda.” Political Research Quarterly 56:29–40.
Burstein, Paul. 1979. “Some ‘Necessary Conditions’ for Popular Control of Public Policy: A Critique.” Polity 12:23–37.
Cain, Bruce E., Ferejohn, John A. and Fiorina, Morris P.. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cain, Bruce E., Ferejohn, John A. and Fiorina, Morris P.. 1979. “The House Is Not a Home: British MPs in Their Constituencies.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 4(4):501–523.
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E. and Stokes, Donald E.. 1964. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Clarke, Harold D., Sanders, David, Stewart, Marianne C. and Whiteley, Paul. 2004. Political Choice in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clausen, Aage R. 1973. How Congressmen Decide: A Policy Focus. New York: St. Martin's.
Chong, Dennis, and Druckman, James N.. 2007. “Framing Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 10: 103–126.
Cohen, Jeffrey E. 1999. Presidential Responsiveness and Public Policy-Making. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Converse, Philip E. 1990. “Popular Representation and the Distribution of Information.” In Ferejohn, John A. and Kuklinski, James H., eds. Information and Democratic Processes, pp.369–388. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Apter, D. E., ed. Ideology and Discontent, pp. 206–261. New York: The Free Press.
Converse, Philip E. and Pierce, Roy. 1986. Political Representation in France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cowley, Philip. 2002. Revolts & Rebellions – Parliamentary Voting Under Blair. London: Politico.
Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cox, Gary W. 1987. The Efficient Secret: The Cabinet and the Development of Political Parties in Victorian England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cox, Gary W., and Morgenstern, Scott. 2001. “Latin America's Reactive Assemblies and Proactive Presidents.” Comparative Politics 33(2): 171–189.
Cutler, Fred. 1999. “Jeremy Bentham and the Public Opinion Tribunal.” Public Opinion Quarterly 63(3):321–346.
Dahl, Robert A. 2000. On Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dahl, Robert A. 1970. Frontiers of Democratic Theory. New York: Harper and Row.
Dahl, Robert A. 1967. Pluralist Democracy in the United States. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Dahl, Robert A. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Carpini, Delli, Michael, X, and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Devine, Donald J. 1970. The Attentive Public: Polyarchical Democracy. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Deutsch, Karl W. 1963. Nerves of Government. New York: The Free Press.
Downs, Willam W. 1999. “Accountability Payoffs in Federal Systems? Competing Logics and Evidence from Europe's Newest Federation.” Publius 29: 87–110.
Downs, Anthony. 1956. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
Druckman, James, and Jacobs, Lawrence. 2006. “Lumpers and Splitters: The Public Opinion Information That Politicians Collect and Use.” Public Opinion Quarterly 70(4):453–476.
Durr, Robert H. 1993. “What Moves Policy Sentiment?American Political Science Review 87(1):158–170.
Duverger, Maurice. 1980. “A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential Government. European Journal of Political Research 8:165–187.
Easton, David. 1965. A Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Easton, David. 1985. “Political Language and Political Reality.” PS: Political Science and Politics 18:10–19.
Eichenberg, Richard, and Stoll, Richard. 2003. “Representing Defense: Democratic Control of the Defense Budget in the United States and Western Europe.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 47: 399–423.
Eisinger, Robert M. 2003. The Evolution of Presidential Polling. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Enns, Peter K. and Kellstedt, Paul M.. 2008. “Policy Mood and Political Sophistication: Why Everyone Moves Mood.” British Journal of Political Science 38:433–454.
Erikson, Robert S. 1990. “Roll Calls, Reputations, and Representation in the U.S. Senate.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 15(4):623–642.
Erikson, Robert S. 1978. “Constituency Opinion and Congressional Behavior: A Reexamination of the Miller-Stokes Representation Data.” American Journal of Political Science 22:511–535.
Erikson, Robert S., MacKuen, Michael B., and Stimson, James A.. 2002. The Macro Polity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Erikson, Robert S., McIver, John P. and Wright, Gerald C.. 1987. “Political Parties, Public Opinion, and State Policy in the United States.” American Political Science Review 83:728–50.
Erikson, Robert S., Wright, Gerald C., and McIver, John P.. 1993. Statehouse Democracy; Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Erikson, Robert S. and Tedin, Kent L.. 2004. American Public Opinion. New York: Longman.
Erickson, Lynda. 1997. “Might More Women Make a Difference? Gender, Party and Ideology among Canada's Parliamentary Candidates.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 30(4):663–688.
Eulau, Heinz. 1967. “Changing Views of Representation.” In Sola Pol, Ithiel, ed. Contemporary Political Science: Toward Empirical Theory, pp. 53–85. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Eulau, Heinz and Karps, Paul D.. 1977. “The Puzzle of Representation: Specifying Components of Responsiveness.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 2(3):233–254.
Eulau, Heinz, and Prewitt, Kenneth. 1973. Labyrinths of Democracy: Adaptations, Linkages, Representation, and Policies in Urban Politics. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
Fairlie, John A. 1940. “The Nature of Political Representation.” American Political Science Review 34(2):236–248.
Fenno, Richard. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. New York: Little, Brown.
Ferejohn, J.A. 1990. “Information and the Electoral Process,” In Ferejohn, John, and Kuklinski, James, eds. Information and Democratic Processes. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Ferejohn, J.A., and Kuklinski, J.H. eds. 1990. Information and Democratic Processes. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Fiorina, Morris P. 1997. “Professionalism, Realignment, and Representation.” American Political Science Review 91:156–162.
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Fiorina, Morris P. 1974. Representatives, Roll Calls, and Constituencies. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Fiorina, Morris P. 1973. “Electoral Margins, Constituency Influence, and Policy Moderation: a Critical Assessment.” American Politics Research 1:479–498.
Fishkin, James S. 1995. The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Fishkin, James S. 1991. Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions For Democratic Reform. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Follesdal, Andreas, and Hix, Simon. 2006. “Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik.” Journal of Common Market Studies 44(3):533–562.
Fournier, Patrick. 2005. “Ambivalence and Attitude Change in Vote Choice: Do Campaign Switchers Experience Internal Conflict?” In Craig, Stephen C. and Martinez, Michael D., eds. Ambivalence, Politics, and Public Policy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Franklin, Mark N. 2004. Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies Since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Franklin, Mark N. and Wlezien, C. 1997. “The Responsive Public: Issue Salience, Policy Change, and Preferences for European Unification.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 9:347–363.
Franklin, Mark N., Brug, Wouter, and Eijk, Cees. 2007. The Economy and the Vote: Electoral Responses to Economic Conditions in 15 Countries. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Froman, Lewis A. 1963. Congressmen and Their Constituencies. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Gabel, Matthew, and Scheve, Kenneth. 2007. “Estimating the Effect of Elite Communications on Public Opinion Using Instrumental Variables.” American Journal of Political Science 51:1013–1028.
Gastil, John. 2000. “Is Face-to-Face Citizen Deliberation a Luxury or a Necessity?Political Communication 17:357–361.
Gay, Claudine. 2002. “Spirals of Trust? The Effect of Descriptive Representation on the Relationship between Citizens and Their Government.” American Journal of Political Science 46(4):717–732.
Geer, John G. 2006. In Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Geer, John G. 1996. From Tea Leaves to Opinion Polls: A Theory of Democratic Leadership. New York: Columbia University Press.
Gelman, Andrew, and King, Gary. 1993. “Why Are American Presidential Election Campaign Polls So Variable When Votes Are So Predictable?British Journal of Political Science 23:409–451.
Gilens, Martin. 2005. “Inequality and Democratic Responsiveness.” Public Opinion Quarterly 65:778–796.
Gilens, Martin 2004. “Public Opinion and Democratic Responsiveness: Who Gets What They Want from Government?” Social Inequality Working Paper, Russell Sage Foundation.
Goggin, M., and Wlezien, C. 1993. “Abortion Opinion and Policy in the American States.” In Goggin, M., ed., Understanding the New Politics of Abortion, pp. 190–202. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Golder, Matt. 2005. “Democratic Electoral Systems Around the World 1946–2000.” Electoral Studies 24: 103–121.
Gotell, Lise, and Brodie, Janine. 1996. “Women and Parties in the 1990s: Less than Even an Issue of Numbers.” In Thorbrun, Hugh G., ed. Party Politics in Canada, 7th ed. Scarborough, ON: Prentice Hall.
Graber, D. 1989. Mass Media and American Politics, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Griffin, J.D., and Newman, B. 2005. “Are Voters Better Represented?” Journal of Politics.
Groseclose, Tim. 2001. “A Model of Candidate Location When One Candidate Has a Valence Advantage.” American Journal of Political Science 45:862–886.
Gulati, Girish J. 2004. “Revisiting the Link Between Electoral Competition and Policy Extremism in the U.S. Congress.” American Politics Research 32:495–520.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1962. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Trans. Burger, Thomas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hansen, John Mark. 1991. Gaining Access: Congress and the Farm Lobby, 1919–1981. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Harrison, Kathryn. 1996. Passing the Buck: Federalism and Canadian Environmental Policy. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Hartley, Thomas, and Russett, Bruce. 1992. “Public Opinion and the Common Defence: Who Governs Military Spending in the United States?American Political Science Review 86:905–915.
Heise, D.R. 1969. “Separating Reliability and Stability in Test-Retest Correlations.” American Sociological Review 34:93–101.
Heitshusen, Valerie, Young, Garry and Wood, David M.. 2005. “Electoral Context and MP Constituency Focus in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom.” American Journal of Political Science 49(1):32–45.
Herman, Edward S., and Chomsky, Noam. 1988. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Pantheon Books.
Hero, Rodney E., and Tolbert, Caroline J.. 1995. “Latinos and Substantive Representation in the U.S. House of Representatives: Direct, Indirect, or Nonexistent?American Journal of Political Science 39(3):640–652.
Herrera, Cheryl Lyn, Herrera, Richard, and Smith, Eric R.A.N.. 1992. “Public Opinion and Congressional Representation.” Public Opinion Quarterly 56(2):185–205.
Hibbs, Douglas A. 1987. The American Political Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hill, Kim Q. and Hinton-Anderson, Angela. 1995. “Pathways of Representation: A Causal Analysis of Public Opinion-Policy Linkages.” American Journal of Political Science 39(4):924–935.
Hill, Kim Q., and Hurley, Patricia. A.. 2003. “Beyond the Demand-Input Model: A Theory of Representational Linkages.” Journal of Politics 65(2):304–26.
Hill, Kim Q., and Hurley, Patricia A.. 1999. “Dyadic Representation Reappraised.” American Journal of Political Science 43:109–137.
Hobolt, Sara B., and Klemmensen, Robert. 2008. “Government Responsiveness and Political Competition in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies 41:309–337.
Hobolt, Sara B., and Klemmensen, Robert. 2005. “Responsive Government? Public Opinion and Policy Preferences in Britain and Denmark.” Political Studies 53:379–402.
Holsti, Ole R. 1996. Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Huber, John D. 1996. Rationalizing Parliament: Legislative Institutions and Party Politics in France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hurley, Patricia A. 1982. “Collective Representation Reappraised.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 7(1):119–136.
Hutchings, Vincent L. 2003. Public Opinion and Democratic Accountability: How Citizens Learn About Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, Ronald and Abramson, Paul. 1994. “Economic Security and Value Change.” American Political Science Review 88:336–354.
Iyengar, Shanto, Norpoth, Helmut and Hahn, Kyu S.. 2004. “Consumer Demand for Election News: The Horserace Sells.” Journal of Politics 66:157–175.
Jackman, Simon, and Sniderman, Paul. 2002. “The Institutional Organization of Choice Spaces: A Political Conception of Political Psychology.” pp.209–223 In Monroe, Kristen, ed., Political Psychology. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Jacobs, Lawrence R. 1995. “The Rise of Presidential Polling: The Nixon White House in Historical Perspective.” Public Opinion Quarterly 59:163–195.
Jacobs, Lawrence R. 1993. The Health of Nations: Public Opinion and the Making of Health Policy in the U.S. and Britain. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Page, Benjamin I.. 2005. “Who Influences U.S. Foreign Policy?American Political Science Review 99:107–123.
Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 2000. Politicians Don't Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1995. “The Rise of Presidential Polling: The Nixon White House in Historical Perspective.” Public Opinion Quarterly 59:163–195.
Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Skocpol, Theda, eds. 2005. Inequality and American Democracy: What We Know and What We Need to Learn. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Jennings, I. 1959. Cabinet Government, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jennings, Will. 2009. “The Public Thermostat, Political Responsiveness and Error-Correction: Border Control and Asylum in Britain 1994–2007.” British Journal of Poltical Science, 39(4):847–870.
Jennings, Will, and John, Peter. 2009. “The Dynamics of Political Attention: Public Opinion and the Queen's Speech in the United Kingdom 1960–2001.” American Journal of Political Science 53(4):838–854.
Johnston, Richard. 2008. “Polarized Pluralism in the Canadian Party System: Presidential Address to the Canadian Political Science Association.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 41:815–834.
Johnston, Richard, Blais, Andre, Gidengil, Elisabeth, and Nevitte, Neil. 1996. The Challenge of Direct Democracy: The 1992 Canadian Referendum. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
Johnston, Richard, Brady, Henry E. and Crete, Jean. 1992. Letting the People Decide: Dynamics of a Canadian Election. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
Johnson, Martin, Brace, Paul, and Arceneaux, Kevin. 2005. “Public Opinion and Dynamic Representation in the American States: The Case of Environmental Attitudes.” Social Science Quarterly 86(1):87–108.
Jones, Bryan D. 1994. Reconceiving Decision-Making in Democratic Politics: Attention, Choice, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jones, Bryan D., Baumgartner, Frank R. and True, James L.. 1998. “Policy Punctuations: U.S. Budget Authority 1947–1995.” Journal of Politics 60: 1–33.
Jones, Bryan D., Baumgartner, Frank R., Breunig, Christian, Wlezien, Christopher, Soroka, Stuart, Foucault, Martial, François, Abel, Green-Pedersen, Christoffer, Koske, Chris, John, Peter, Mortensen, Peter B., Varone, Frédéric, Walgrave, Stefaan. 2009. “A General Empirical Law of Public Budgets: An Empirical Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 53(4):855–873.
Joumard, Isabelle, and Kongsrud, Per Mathis. 2003. “Fiscal Relations Across Government Levels.” OECD Economic Studies 36:155–229.
Karol, David. 2007. “Has Polling Enhanced Representation? Unearthing Evidence from the Literary Digest Issue Polls.” Studies in American Political Development 21:16–29.
Katz, Richard S. 1997. Democracy and Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kelly, Nathan J. 2009. The Politics of Income Inequality in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kelly, R.M., Saint-Germain, M.A. and Horn, J.D.. 1991. “Female Public Officials: A Different Voice?,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 515:77–87.
Kerr, Brinck, and Miller, Will. 1997. “Latino Representation, It's Direct and Indirect.” American Journal of Political Science 41(3):1066–1071.
Key, V.O., Jr. 1966. The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting 1936–1960. New York: Vintage Books.
King, Anthony and Wybrow, Robert J.. 2001. British Political Opinion: 1937–2000, The Gallup Polls. London: Politico.
Kingdon, John W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, 2nd ed. New York: Harper Collins.
Kingdon, John W. 1981. Congressmen's Voting Decisions, 2nd ed. New York: Harper & Row.
Kingdon, John W. 1973. Congressmen's Voting Decisions. New York: Harper & Row.
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Volkens, Andrea, Bara, Judith, Budge, Ian, and McDonald, Michael. 2006. Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990–2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Krosnick, Jon. 1990. “Government Policy and Citizen Passion: A Study of Issue Publics in Contemporary America.” Political Behavior 12(1):59–92.
Krosnick, Jon. 1989. “Question Wording and Reports of Survey Results: The Case of Louis Harris and Associates and Aetna Life and Casualty.” Public Opinion Quarterly 53:107–113.
Kuklinski, James H. 1977. “District Competitiveness and Legislative Roll Call Behavior: A Reassessment of the Marginality Hypothesis.” American Journal of Political Science 20:627–638.
Kuklinski, James H. 1978. “Representation and Elections: A Policy Analysis.” American Political Science Review 72:165–177.
Kuklinski, James, Quirk, Paul, Jerit, Jennifer, Schwieder, David and Rich, Robert. 2000. “Misinformation and the Currency of Democratic Citizenship.” Journal of Politics 62:790–816.
Kymlicka, Will. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kymlicka, Will. 1993. “Group Representation in Canadian Politics.” In Equity and Community: The Charter, Interest Advocacy, and Representation. Seidle, F.L., ed. Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy.
Lau, Richard R., and Redlawsk, David P.. 2006. How Voters Decide: Information Processing During Election Campaigns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Laver, Michael, and Shepsle, Kenneth A.. 1996. Making and Breaking Governments: Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Laver, Michael, and Shepsle, Kenneth A.. 1997. “Events, Equilibria, and Survival.” American Journal of Political Science 42:28–54.
Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Berelson, Bernard, and Gaudet, Hazel. 1968. The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes up his Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lijphart, Arend. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies 1945–1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lijphart, Arend. 1977. Democracy in Plural Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Linz, Juan J. 1994. “Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy: Does It Make a Difference?” In Linz, Juan and Valenzuela, Arturo, eds. Failure of Presidential Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lippmann, Walter. 1925. The Phantom Public. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
Lupia, Arthur. 1994. “The Effect of Information on Voting Behavior and Electoral Outcomes: An Experimental Study of Direct Legislation.” Public Choice 78:65–86.
Lupia, Arthur and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lupia, Arthur and Strom, Kaare. 1995. “Coalition Termination and the Strategic Timing of Parliamentary Elections.” American Political Science Review 89:648–665.
Luskin, Robert C., Fishkin, James S., and Jowell, Roger. 2002. “Considered Opinions: Deliberative Polling in Britain.” British Journal of Political Science 32:455–487.
MacRae, Duncan, Jr. 1952. “The Relation Between Roll Call Votes and Constituencies in the Massachusetts House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review 46(4):1046–1055.
Maestas, Cherie. 2000. “Professional Legislatures and Ambitious Politicians: Policy Responsiveness of Individuals and Institutions.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 25(4):663–690.
Maestas, Cherie. 2003The Incentive to Listen: Progressive Ambition, Resources, and Opinion Monitoring among State Legislators.” Journal of Politics 65:439–456.
Manin, Bernard. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
Manin, Bernard, Przeworski, Adam, and Stokes, Susan. 1999. “Elections and Representation.” In Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan, and Manin, Bernard, eds. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’Journal of Politics 61(3):628–657.
Mansbridge, Jane. 1986. Why We Lost the ERA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Manza, Jeff and Cook, Fay Lomax. 2002. “Policy Responsiveness to Public Opinion: The State of the Debate.” In Manza, Jeff, Cook, Fay Lomax, and Page, Benjamin I., eds. Navigating Public Opinion: Polls, Policy, and the Future of American Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Matland, Richard E. and Studlar, Donley T.. 1996. “The Contagion of Women Candidates in Single-Member District and Proportional Representation Electoral Systems: Canada and Norway.” Journal of Politics 58(3):707–733.
Matthews, D.R., and Valen, H. 1999. Parliamentary Representation: The Case of the Norwegian Storting. Columbus: Ohio State Press.
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Mayhew, David R. 1966. Party Loyalty among Congressmen: The Difference Between Democrats and Republicans 1947–1962. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
McCrone, Donald J. and Kuklinski, James H.. 1979. “The Delegate Theory of Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 23:278–300.
McDonald, Michael D., and Budge, Ian. 2005. Elections, Parties, Democracy: Conferring the Median Mandate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McGann, Anthony, 2006. The Logic of Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Mill, J.S. 1991 [1861]. Considerations on Representative Government in John Stuart Mill On Liberty and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Miller, A.H., Miller, W.E., Raine, A.S., and Browne, T.A. 1976. “A Majority Party in Disarray: Policy Polarization in the 1972 Election.” American Political Science Review 70:753–778.
Miller, Warren E. 1967. “Voting and Foreign Policy.” Domestic Sources of Foreign Policy. Rosenau, James N., ed. New York: Free Press. pp.213–230.
Miller, Warren E., Pierce, Roy, Thomassen, Jacques, Herrera, Richard, Holmberg, Soren, Esaiasson, Peter, and Wessels, Bernhard. 1999. Policy Representation in Western Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Miller, Warren E. and Stokes, Donald E.. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57(1):45–56.
Monroe, Alan. 1998. “Public Opinion and Public Policy 1980–1993.” Public Opinion Quarterly 62:6–28.
Monroe, Alan. 1979. “Consistency between Constituency Preferences and National Policy Decisions.” American Politics Quarterly 12:3–19.
Morone, James A. and Marmor, Theodore R.. 1981. “Representing Consumer Interests: The Case of American Health Planning.” Ethics 91(3: Special Issue: Symposium on the Theory and Practice of Representation):431–450.
Murray, Shoon Kathleen. 2006. “Private Polls and Presidential Policymaking: Reagan as a Facilitator of Change.” Public Opinion Quarterly. 70(4): 477–499.
Murray, Shoon Kathleen, and Howard, Peter. 2002. “Variation in White House Polling Operations: Carter to Clinton.” Public Opinion Quarterly 66:527–558.
Nagel, Jack and Wlezien, Christpher. n.d. “Center-Party Strength and Major-Party Polarization in Britain.” British Journal of Political Science, forthcoming.
Neuman, W. Russell. 1986. The Paradox of Mass Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Norrander, Barbara and Wilcox, Clyde. 1999. “Public Opinion, and Policymaking in the States: The Case of Post-Roe Abortion Policy.” Policy Studies Journal 27:707–722.
Norris, Pippa. 2000. A Virtuous Circle? Political Communications in Post-Industrial Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Norris, Pippa. 1985. “Women's Legislative Representation in Western Europe.” West European Politics 8:90–101.
Norris, Pippa, and Lovenduski, Joni. 2004. “Why Parties Fail to Learn: Electoral Defeat, Selective Perception and British Party Politics.” Party Politics 10(1): 85–104.
Neumann, Russell W. 1986. The Paradox of Mass Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Newhouse, Joseph P. 1977. “Medical-Care Expenditure: A Cross-National Survey.” The Journal of Human Resources 12(1):115–125.
Oldendick, Robert W. and Ann Bardes, Barbara. 1982. “Mass and Elite Foreign Policy Opinions.” Public Opinion Quarterly 46(3):368–382.
Page, Benjamin I. 2002. “The Semi-Sovereign Public.” In Manza, J., Cook, F.L., & Page, B.I., eds. Navigating Public Opinion: Polls, Policy, and the Future of American Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Page, Benjamin I. and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Page, Benjamin I. and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1983. “Effects of Public Opinion on Policy.” American Political Science Review 77:175–190.
Persson, T., Roland, G., and Tabellini, G. 1997. “Separation of Powers and Political Accountability.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(4): 1163–202.
Petry, Francois. 1999. “The Opinion-Policy Relationship in Canada.” Journal of Politics 61:540–550.
Petry, Francois and Mendelsohn, Matthew. 2004. “Public Opinion and Policy Making in Canada, 1995–2001.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 27:505–529.
Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pitkin, H.F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Poole, Keith T. and Rosenthal, Howard. 2007. Ideology and Congress. New Brunswick: Transaction.
Popkin, Samuel L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Popkin, Samuel L. 1994. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns, 2d ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Powell, G. Bingham, Jr. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Views. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Powell, G. Bingham, Jr., and Whitten, Guy D.. 1993. “A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context.” American Journal of Political Science 37:391–414.
Prior, Markus. 2007. Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan Carol, and Manin, Bernard. 1999. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ranney, Austin. 1954. The Doctrine of Responsible Party Government: Its Origins and Present State. Urbana: The University of Illinois Press.
Rae, Douglas. 1981. “Two Contradictory Ideas of (Political) Equality.” Ethics 91(3, Special Issue: Symposium on the Theory and Practice of Representation):451–456.
Rasinski, Kenneth A. 1989. “The Effect of Question Wording on Public Support for Government Spending.” Public Opinion Quarterly 53: 388–394.
Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Riker, William. 1982. “The Two-Party System and Duverger's Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science.” American Political Science Review 76(4):753–766.
Rodden, Jonathan. 2004. “Comparative Federalism and Decentralization: Meaning and Measurement.” Comparative Politics 36:481–500.
Rodden, Jonathan. 2003. “Reviving Leviathan: Fiscal Federalism and the Growth of Government.” International Organization 57:695–729.
Rogowski, Ronald. 1981. “Representation in Political Theory and in Law.” Ethics 91(3, Special Issue):395–430.
Rogowski, Ronald, and Kayser, Mark Andreas. 2002. “Majoritarian Electoral Systems and Consumer Power: Price-Level Evidence from the OECD Countries.” American Journal of Political Science 46(3):526–539.
Rosen, Harvey S. and Gayer, Ted. 2008. Public Finance, 8th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Rottinghaus, Brandon. 2006. “Rethinking Presidential Responsiveness: The Public Presidency and Rhetorical Congruency 1953–2001.” Journal of Politics 68(3):720–732.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1762. The Social Contract, or Principles of Political Right.
Said, Edward W. 1997. Covering Islam: How the Media Experts Determine How We See the Rest of the World. Revised ed. New York: Vintage Books.
Sapiro, Virginia. 1981. “When Are Interests Interesting?American Political Science Review 75(3):701–16.
Sartori, Giovanni. 1997. Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes, 2nd ed. New York: New York University Press.
Schattschneider, E.E. 1975 (1960). The Semi-Sovereign People. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press.
Schattschneider, E.E. 1942. Party Government. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Schleiter, Petra, and Morgan-Jones, Edward. N.d. “Citizens, Presidents, and Assemblies: The Study of Semi-Presidentialism beyond Duverger and Linz.” British Journal of Political Science, forthcoming.
Schmidt, Manfred G. 1996. “When Parties Matter: A Review of the Possibilities and Limits of Partisan Influence on Public Policy,” European Journal of Political Research 30(2):155–183.
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1950. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 3rd ed. New York: Harper & Row.
Shapiro, Catherine R., Brady, David W., Brody, Richard A., and Ferejohn, John A.. 1990. “Linking Constituency Opinion and Senate Voting Scores: A Hybrid Explanation.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 15(4):599–621.
Shapiro, Robert Y. and Young, John T.. 1986. “The Polls: Medical Care in the United States.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 50:418–428.
Shapiro, Robert Y., Patterson, Kelly D., Russell, Judith and Young, John T.. 1987. “A Report: Employment and Social Welfare.” Public Opinion Quarterly 51:268–281.
Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 2005. “Semi-Presidential Systems: Dual Executive and Mixed Authority Patterns.” French Politics 3:323–351.
Smith, Thomas. 1987. “That Which We Call Welfare by Any Other Name Would Smell Sweeter: An Analysis of the Impact of Question Wording on Response Patterns.” Public Opinion Quarterly 51:75–83.
Sniderman, Paul M., Brody, Richard A. and Tetlock, Philip. 1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sniderman, Paul M., Fletcher, Joseph F., Russell, Peter H., Tetlock, Philip E. and Gaines, Brian J.. 1991. “The Fallacy of Democratic Elitism: Elite Competition and Commitment to Civil Liberties.” British Journal of Political Science 21(3):349–370.
Sniderman, Paul M. and Theriault, S.M.. 2004. “The Structure of Political Argument and the Logic of Issue Framing.” In Sniderman, Paul M. and Saris, W.E., eds. Studies in Public Opinion, pp.133–165. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Soroka, Stuart. 2002. Agenda-Setting Dynamics in Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Soroka, Stuart, and Wlezien, Christopher. 2008. “On the Limits to Inequality in Representation.” P.S.: Political Science & Politics 41:319–327.
Soroka, Stuart, and Wlezien, Christopher. 2005. “Opinion-Policy Dynamics: Public Preferences and Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom.” British Journal of Political Science 35:665–89.
Soroka, Stuart, and Wlezien, Christopher. 2004. “Opinion Representation and Policy Feedback: Canada in Comparative Perspective.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 37(3):531–60.
Soroka, Stuart, Wlezien, Christopher, and McLean, Iain. 2006. “Public Expenditure in the U.K.: How Measures Matter.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (169):255–71.
Stevenson, Randolph T. 2001. “The Economy and Policy Mood: A Fundamental Dynamic of Democratic Politics?American Journal of Political Science 45:620–633.
Still, Jonathan W. 1981. “Political Equality and Election Systems.” Ethics 91(3, Special Issue: Symposium on the Theory and Practice of Representation):375–394.
Stimson, James A. 1991. Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Stimson, James A. 1989. “The Paradox of Ignorant Voters, But Competent Electorate.” In Perspectives on American and Texas Politics, Lutz, Donald and Tedin, Kent, eds. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt.
Stimson, James A., MacKuen, Michael B. and Erikson, Robert S.. 1995. “Dynamic Representation.” American Political Science Review 89:543–565.
Stone, Walter J. 1979. “Measuring Constituency-Representative Linkages: Problems and Prospects.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 4(4):623–639.
Strøm, Kaare. 2003. “Parliamentary Democracy and Delegation.” In Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies, eds. Strom, Kaare, Muller, Wolfgang, and Bergman, Torbjorn, 55–106. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taagepera, Rein, and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1989. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Teixeira, Ruy A. 1992. The Disappearing American Voter. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
Trudeau, Pierre E. 1968. Federalism and French Canadians. Toronto: MacMillan.
Truman, David. 1951. The Governmental Process. New York: Knopf
Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Ura, Joseph, and Ellis, Christopher. 2008. “Income, Preferences and the Dynamics of Policy Responsiveness.” PS: Political Science and Politics 41:785–794.
Uslaner, Eric M. and Weber, Ronald E.. 1979. “U.S. State Legislators' Opinions and Perceptions of Constituency Attitudes.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 4:563–585.
Eijk, C., and Franklin, Mark N. 1996. Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Verba, Sidney and Nie, Norman H.. 1972. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper & Row.
Wahlke, John C. 1971. “Policy Demands and System Support: The Role of the Represented.” British Journal of Political Science 1(3):271–290.
Watts, Ronald L. 1999. Comparing Federal Systems. 2nd ed. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
Weakliem, David. 2003. “Public Opinion Research and Political Sociology.” Research in Political Sociology 12:49–80.
Weber, Ronald E. 1999. “The Quality of State Legislative Representation: A Critical Assessment,” The Journal of Politics 61:609–627.
Weiler, J. H. H., Haltern, U. R. and Mayer, F. 1995. “European Democracy and its Critique.” West European Politics 18(3):4–39.
Weissberg, Robert. 1978. “Collective vs. Dyadic Representation in Congress.” American Political Science Review 72:535–47.
Weissberg, Robert. 1976. Public Opinion and Popular Government. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Welch, Susan and Hibbing, John. 1984. “Hispanics in Congress.” Social Science Quarterly 65:328–335.
Wiener, Norbert. 1961. Cybernetics, or Control and Communication in the Animal World. New York: Wiley.
Wlezien, Christopher. 2005. “On the Salience of Political Issues: The Problem with ‘Most Important Problem.’Electoral Studies 24:555–79.
Wlezien, Christopher. 2004. Patterns of Representation: Dynamics of Public Preferences and Policy.” Journal of Politics 66:1–24.
Wlezien, Christopher. 1996a. “Dynamics of Representation: The Case of U.S. Spending on Defense.” British Journal of Political Science 26:81–103.
Wlezien, Christopher. 1996b. “The President, Congress, and Appropriations 1951–1985.” American Politics Research 24: 43–67.
Wlezien, Christopher. 1995. “The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 39:981–1000.
Wlezien, Christopher. 1993. “The Political Economy of Supplemental Appropriations.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 18: 51–76.
Wlezien, Christopher, and Soroka, Stuart. n.d. “Inequality in Policy Responsiveness?” In Enns, Peter and Wlezien, Christopher, eds, Who Gets Represented?New York: Russell Sage Foundation, forthcoming.
Wlezien, Christopher, and Soroka, Stuart. 2007. “Relationships Between Public Opinion and Policy.” In Dalton, Russell and Klingemann, Hans-Deiter, eds. Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, pp.799–817. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wlezien, Christopher, and Soroka, Stuart. 2003. “Measures and Models of Budgetary Policy.” Policy Studies Journal 31:273–286.
Wright, Gerald C. 1989. “Policy Voting in the U.S. Senate: Who Is Represented?Legislative Studies Quarterly 14:465–486.
Yagade, A. and Dozier, D. M.. 1990. “The Media Agenda-Setting Effect of Concrete versus Abstract Issues.” Journalism Quarterly 67:3–10.
Zaller, John. 1998. “Monica Lewinsky's Contribution to Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 31:182–9.
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge University Press.


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.