Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Deliberative Democracy between Theory and Practice
  • Cited by 67
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Buy the print book

Book description

Deliberative democrats seek to link political choices more closely to the deliberations of common citizens, rather than consigning them to speak only in the desiccated language of checks on a ballot. Sober thinkers from Plato to today, however, have argued that if we want to make good decisions we cannot entrust them to the deliberations of common citizens. Critics argue that deliberative democracy is wildly unworkable in practice. Deliberative Democracy between Theory and Practice cuts across this debate by clarifying the structure of a deliberative democratic system, and goes on to re-evaluate the main empirical challenges to deliberative democracy in light of this new frame. It simultaneously reclaims the wider theory of deliberative democracy and meets the empirical critics squarely on terms that advance, rather than evade, the debate. Doing so has important implications for institutional design, the normative theory of democracy, and priorities for future research and practice.

Reviews

‘This rich and important project seeks to offer an account of deliberative democracy that can stand up to political psychological accounts of citizen learning and preference formation, as well as to formal theoretic critiques of preference aggregation. Neblo engages a dialogue between normative theory and empirical social science, providing his readers with a thorough instruction in those literatures so that they can do the same. This creative, insightful text is a breakthrough for theorizing representative democracy.’

Lisa Disch - University of Michigan

‘Between the deliberative democratic ideal and the cesspool of status quo politics lies an alternative reality that both deliberative theorists and political activists could accept as valid. Michael A. Neblo’s book has visited this place more than once, both in the lab and in the field, and anyone wishing to help take us there must read this book. It provides a roadmap to a more rational and respectful mode of politics.’

John Gastil - Director, McCourtney Institute for Democracy, Pennsylvania State University, and author of The Jury and Democracy and Political Communication and Deliberation

‘Michael A. Neblo has written an exemplary book, exhibiting equal measures of philosophical sophistication, methodological rigor, and substantive import. What is more, Deliberative Democracy between Theory and Practice is revelatory, showing the author as a decent, humane thinker. Readers will not just learn from Neblo; I think they will be touched as well.’

James Johnson - University of Rochester, New York

‘A beautiful introduction to deliberative democracy and a must-read for scholars in the field. Clearly and engagingly written, based on deep theoretical understanding and a set of brilliant experiments, this book clears up a host of misunderstandings about what deliberative democracy is and what it can do for us.’

Jane Mansbridge - Charles F. Adams Professor of Political Leadership and Democratic Values, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Massachusetts

‘For citizens, students, and scholars who care about deliberation and democracy in theory and practice, Michael A. Neblo’s work is essential reading … Deliberative Democracy between Theory and Practice points the way forward to more productive interaction between deliberative theorists and empirical social scientists, helping both sides to avoid talking past each other and opening up promising avenues for evaluating the deliberative system. Neblo’s work is both clear-eyed and deeply empathetic: he confronts squarely the limitations and vexing challenges of citizenship in modern mass democracy, while still retaining a capacious sense of care and respect for the ordinary women and men whose views and conversations are at the heart of the deliberative system. [The book] thus holds up a vision of deliberative democratic citizenship that is at once empirically grounded and theoretically rich.’

Christopher Karpowitz - Co-Director, Center for the Study of Elections and Democracy, Brigham Young University, Utah, and author of Deliberation, Democracy, and Civic Forums

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

References

Achen, C. H. (1975). “Mass Political Attitudes and the Survey Response.” American Political Science Review 69(4): 1218–31.
Ackerman, B. and Fishkin, J.. (2004). “Righting the Ship of Democracy.” Legal Affairs January/February: 34–9.
Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levison, D. J., and Sanford, R. N.. (1950). The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Norton.
Altemeyer, R. (1981). Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.
Althaus, S. L. (2003). Collective Preferences in Democratic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Arrow, K. J. (1951). Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: John Wiley.
Austen-Smith, D. (1990). “Information Transmission in Debate.” American Journal of Political Science 34(1): 124–52.
Austen-Smith, D. and Banks, J. S.. (1996). “Information Aggregation, Rationality, and the Condorcet Jury Theorem.” American Political Science Review 91(1): 3445.
Austen-Smith, D. and Feddersen, T. J.. (2006). “Deliberation, Preference Uncertainty, and Voting Rules.” American Political Science Review 100(2): 209–17.
Austen-Smith, D. and Feddersen, T. J.. (2008). “In Response to Jurg Steiner's, ‘Concept Stretching: The Case of Deliberation.’European Political Science 7(2): 191–3.
Austen-Smith, D. and Feddersen, T. J.. (2009). “Information Aggregation and Communication in Committees.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of Biological Sciences 364: 763–9.
Bächtiger, A., Niemeyer, S., Neblo, M. A., Steenbergen, M. R., and Steiner, J.. (2010). “Disentangling Diversity in Deliberative Democracy: Competing Theories, Their Blind Spots and Complementarities.” Journal of Political Philosophy 18(1): 3263.
Barabas, J. (2004). “How Deliberation Affects Policy Opinions.” American Political Science Review 98(4): 687701.
Bartels, L. M. (1996). “Uninformed Votes: Information Effects in Presidential Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 40(1): 194230.
Bartels, L. M. (2003). “Democracy with Attitudes.” In Electoral Democracy, edited by MacKuen, Michael B. and Rabinowitz, George. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 4882.
Belzer, M. H. (2000). Sweatshops on Wheels: Winners and Losers in Trucking Deregulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ben-Ner, A., Putterman, L., and Ren, T.. (2010). “Lavish Returns on Cheap Talk: Two-Way Communication in Trust Games.” The Journal of Socio-Economics 40(1): 113.
Berelson, B. R. (1952). “Democratic Theory and Public Opinion.” Public Opinion Quarterly 16: 313–30.
Bizer, G. Y., Krosnick, J. A., Holbrook, A. L., Wheeler, S. C., Rucker, D. D., and Petty, R. E.. (2004). “The Impact of Personality on Cognitive Behavioral, and Affective Political Processes: The Effects of Need to Evaluate.” Journal of Personality 72(5): 9951027.
Blair, J., Mitchell, D. R., and Blair, K.. (2005). The Psychopath: Emotion and the Brain. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Bohman, J. (1996). Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Bohman, J. (2007). “Political Communication and the Epistemic Value of Diversity: Deliberation and Legitimation in Media Societies.” Communication Theory 17(4): 348–55.
Brady, D. W. and Volden, C.. (2005). Revolving Gridlock. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Brandom, R. (1994). Making It Explicit. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brinkley, D. (1996). 11 Presidents, 4 Wars, 22 Political Conventions, 1 Moon Landing, 3 Assassinations, 2,000 Weeks of News and Other Stuff on Television and 18 Years of Growing Up in North Carolina. New York: Ballantine Books.
Burden, C. Hysom, T., Esterling, K. M., Lazer, D., and Neblo, M. A.. (2007). 2007 Gold Mouse Report: Lessons from the Best Web Sites on Capitol Hill. Washington, DC: Congressional Management Foundation.
Burns, N., Schlozman, K. L., and Verba, S.. (2001). The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality, and Political Participation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cacioppo, J. T. and Petty, R. E.. (1982). “The Need for Cognition.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42(1): 116–31.
Chambers, S. (2009). “Rhetoric and the Public Sphere: Has Deliberative Democracy Abandoned Mass Democracy.” Political Theory 37(3): 323–50.
Cohen, J. (1999). “Habermas on Democracy.” Ratio Juris 12(4): 385416.
Converse, P. E. (1963). “Attitudes and Non-Attitudes: Continuation of a Dialogue.” In The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems, edited by Tufte, E. R.. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Converse, P. E. (1964). “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, edited by Apter, D. E.. New York: Free Press, 206–61.
Cook, F. L., Carpini, M. X. Delli, and Jacobs, L.. (2007). “Who Deliberates? Discursive Participation in America.” In Deliberation, Participation and Democracy: Can the People Govern?, edited by Rosenberg, Shawn W.. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dahl, R. A. (1956). A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Dahl, R. A. (1958). “Political Theory: Truth and Consequences.” World Politics 11(1): 89102.
Dahl, R. A. (1961). “The Behavioral Approach in Political Science: Epitaph for a Monument to a Successful Protest.” American Political Science Review 55(4): 763–72.
Dahlberg, L. (2005). “The Habermasian Public Sphere: Taking Difference Seriously?Theory and Society 34(2): 111–36.
Delli Carpini, M. X. and Keeter, S.. (1996). What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Delli Carpini, M. X., Cook, F. L., and Jacobs, L. R.. (2004). “Public Deliberation, Discursive Participation, and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature.” Annual Review of Political Science 7: 315–44.
Dewey, J. (1927). The Public and Its Problems. Chicago, IL: Swallow.
Dickson, E. S., Hafer, C., and Landa, D.. (2008). “Cognition and Strategy: A Deliberation Experiment.” The Journal of Politics 70: 974–89.
Disch, L. (2011). “Toward a Mobilization Conception of Democratic Representation.” American Political Science Review 105: 100–14.
Druckman, J. N. (2004). “Political Preference Formation: Competition, Deliberation, and the (Ir)relevance of Framing Effects.” American Political Science Review 98(4): 671–86.
Dryzek, John S. (2005). “Handle with Care: The Deadly Hermeneutics of Deliberative Instrumentation.” Acta Politica 40(2): 197211.
Dyson, F. (2004). “A Meeting with Enrico Fermi.” Nature 427: 297.
Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoiding Politics: How Americans Produce Apathy in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Elster, J. (1983). Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Paris: Cambridge University Press.
Elster, J. (1986) “The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory.” In Foundations of Social Choice Theory, edited by Elster, J. and Hylland, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Elster, J., Ed. (1998). Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Erickson, R. S. (1979). “The SRC Panel Data and Mass Political Attitudes.” British Journal of Political Science 2: 2560.
Erickson, R. S., MacKuen, M. B., and Stimson, J. A.. (2002). The Macro Polity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Esterling, K. M., Neblo, M. A., and Lazer, D.. (2011a). “Means, Motive, and Opportunity in Becoming Informed about Politics: A Deliberative Field Experiment with Members of Congress and Their Constituents.” Public Opinion Quarterly 75 (3): 483-503.
Esterling, K. M., Lazer, D., and Neblo, M. A.. (2011b). “Representative Communication: Web Site Interactivity and Distributional Path Dependence in the US Congress.” Political Communication 28(4): 409–39.
Esterling, K. M., Neblo, M. A., and Lazer, D.. (2011c). “Estimating Treatment Effects in the Presence of Noncompliance and Nonresponse: The Generalized Endogenous Treatment Model.” Political Analysis 19(2): 205–26.
Esterling, K. M., Lazer, D., and Neblo, M. A.. (2013). “Connecting to Constituents: The Diffusion of Representation Practices among Congressional Website.” Political Research Quarterly 66: 102.
Farrar, C., Fishkin, J., Green, D., List, C., Luskin, R., and Paluck, E.. (2010). “Disaggregating Deliberation's Effects: An Experiment with a Deliberative Poll.” British Journal of Political Science 40: 333–47.
Fehr, E. and Rockenbach, B.. (2003). “Detrimental Effects of Sanctions on Human Altruism.” Nature 422: 137–40.
Ferrell, R. H. (1994). Harry S. Truman: A Life. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press.
Fishkin, J. S. (2005). “Defending Deliberation: A Comment on Ian Shapiro's The State of Democratic Theory.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8(1): 71–8.
Fishkin, J. S. (2009). When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fishkin, J. S. and Luskin, R. C.. (2005). “Experimenting With a Democratic Ideal: Deliberative Polling and Public Opinion.” Acta Politica 40(3): 284–98.
Frohlich, N. and Oppenheimer, J.. (2006). “Skating on Thin Ice: Cracks in the Public Choice Foundation.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 18(3): 235–66.
Gastil, J., Deess, E. P., et al. (2002). “Civic Awakening in the Jury Room: A Test of the Connection between Jury Deliberation and Political Participation.” Journal of Politics 64(2): 585–95.
Gerardi, D. and Yariv, L. (2007). “Deliberative Voting.” Journal of Economic Theory 134(1): 317–38.
Goeree, J. K. and Yariv, L.. (2011). “An Experimental Study of Collective Deliberation.” Econometrica 79(3): 893921.
Gibbard, A. (1973). “Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result.” Econometrica 29(1): 3343.
Goodin, R. E. (2000). “Democratic Deliberation Within.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 29(1): 81109.
Goodin, R. E. (2003). Reflective Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D.. (1996). Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge: Belknap Press / Harvard University Press.
Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D. F.. (2004). Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Habermas, J. (2006). “Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research1.” Communication Theory 16(4): 411–26.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1993). Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1979). Communication and the Evolution of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1976). Legitimation Crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1989b [1962]). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Heath, J. (2001). Communicative Action and Rational Choice. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Heath, J. (2008). Following the Rules: Practical Reasoning and Deontic Constraint. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Herbst, S. (1998). Reading Public Opinion: How Political Actors View the Democratic Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hibbing, J. R. and Theiss-Morse, E.. (2002). Stealth Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hobbes, T. (1991 [1651]). Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huckfeldt, R. (2007). “Unanimity, Discord, and the Communication of Public Opinion.” American Journal of Political Science 51(4): 978–95.
Jacobs, L. R. and Shapiro, R. Y.. (2000). Politicians Don't Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jacobs, L. R., Cook, F. L., and Delli Carpini, M. X.. (2009). Talking Together: Public Deliberation and Political Participation in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jacquette, D. (2007). “Two Sides of Any Issue.” Argumentation 21(2): 115–27.
Jensen, J. L. (2003). “Public Spheres on the Internet: Anarchic or Government-Sponsored: A Comparison.” Scandinavian Political Studies 26(4): 349–74.
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., et al., Eds. (1982). Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, Immanuel. (1979) [1798]. The Conflict of the Faculties. New York: Abaris Books.
Kelly, J. (2012). Framing Democracy: A Behavioral Approach to Democratic Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Key, V. O. J. (1966). The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting, 1936–1960. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Knoke, D., Pappi, F. U., Broadbent, J., and Tsujinaka, Y.. (1996). Comparing Policy Networks: Labor Politics in the U.S., Germany, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kohlberg, L. (1971). From Is to Ought: How to Commit the Naturalistic Fallacy and Get Away With it in the Study of Moral Development. New York: Academic Press.
Krehbiel, K. (1998). Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kühberger, A. (1998). “The Influence of Framing on Risky Decisions: A Meta-Analysis.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 75(1): 2355.
Kuga, K. and Nagatani, H.. (1974). “Voter Antagonism and the Paradox of Voting.” Econometrica 42: 1045–67.
Lacy, D. (2001). “A Theory of Nonseparable Preferences in Survey Responses.” American Journal of Political Science 45(2): 239–58.
Landa, D. and Meirowitz, A.. (2009). “Game Theory, Information, and Deliberative Democracy.” American Journal of Political Science 53(2): 427–44.
Lau, R. R. and Redlawsk, D. P.. (1997). ““Voting Correctly”.” American Political Science Review 91(3): 585–97.
Lazer, D., Sohkey, A., Neblo, M. A., Kennedy, R., and Esterling, K.. (2015). “Expanding the Conversation: Multiplier Effects from a Deliberative Field Experiment.” Forthcoming, Political Communication.
Lazer, D., Neblo, M. A., and Esterling, K.. (2011). “The Internet and the Madisonian Cycle: Possibilities and Prospects for Consultative Representation”. Connecting Democracy: Online Consultation and the Flow of Political Communication, pp. 265–85.
Lazer, D., Mergel, I., Ziniel, C., Esterling, K. M., and Neblo, M. A.. (2011). “The Multiple Institutional Logics of Innovation.” International Public Management Journal 14(3): 311–40.
Lazer, D., Neblo, M. A., Esterling, K., Goldschmidt, K.. (2009). “Online Town Hall Meetings: Exploring Democracy in the 21st Century.” Congressional Management Foundation.
Lind, E. A. and Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum Press.
Lippmann, W. (1922). Public Opinion. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
Lodge, M., McGraw, K. M., and Stroh, P.. (1989). “An Impression-Driven Model of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review 87: 399419.
Lupia, A. and McCubbins, M. D.. (1998). The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Luskin, R. C. and Fishkin, J. S.. (2002) “Deliberation and ‘Better Citizens’.” Paper presented at the Joint Sessions of Workshops of the ECPR, Turin, Italy, 3/2002.
Mackie, G. (2003). Democracy Defended. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Madar, D. (2000). Heavy Traffic: Deregulation, Trade, and Transformation in North American Trucking. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Mansbridge, J. (1980). Beyond Adversary Democracy. New York: Basic Books.
Mansbridge, J. (1999). “On the Idea that Participation Makes Better Citizens.” In Citizen Competence and Democratic Institutions, edited by Elkin, and Soltan, . University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Mansbridge, J. (2003). “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97(4): 515–27.
Mansbridge, J. (2007). “Self-Interest in Deliberation.” Kettering Review 25(1): 6272.
Mansbridge, J., Amengual, M., Hartz-Karp, J., and Gastil, J.. (2006). “Norms of Deliberation: An Inductive Study.” Journal of Public Deliberation 2(1): 147.
Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Estlund, D., Follesdal, A., Fung, A., Lafont, C., Manin, B., and Marti, J. L.. (2010). “The Place of Self-Interest in Deliberative Democracy.” Journal of Political Philosophy 18(1): 64100.
Marcus, G. and MacKuen, M. (1993). “Anxiety, Enthusiasm, and the Vote: The Emotional Underpinnings of Learning and Involvement during Presidential Campaigns.” American Political Science Review 87: 672–86.
Margolis, H. (2007). Cognition and Extended Rational Choice. London: Routledge.
McKelvey, R. D. (1979). “General Conditions for Global Intransitivities in Formal Voting Models.” Econometrica 47: 1085–112.
McKelvey, R. D. and Ordershook, P. C.. (1986). “Information, Electoral Equilibria, and the Democratic Ideal.” The Journal of Politics 48: 909–37.
McManus, J. (2009). Cowboys Full: The Story of Poker. New York: MacMillan.
Meirowitz, A. (2006). “Designing Institutions to Aggregate Preferences and Information.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1: 373–92.
Meirowitz, A. (2007). “In Defense of Exclusionary Deliberation: Communication and Voting with Private Beliefs and Values.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 19(3): 301.
Mendelberg, T. (2002). “The Deliberative Citizen: Theory and Evidence.” Research in Micropolitics 6: 151–93.
Mendelberg, T. and Oleske, J.. (2000). “Race and Public Deliberation.” Political Communication 17: 169–91.
Mercier, H. and Sperber, D.. (2011a). “Argumentation: It's Adaptiveness and Efficacy.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34: 94111.
Mercier, H. and Sperber, D.. (2011b). “Why do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory.” Brain Sciences 34(2): 94111.
Miller, D. (1992). “Deliberative Democracy and Social Choice.” Political Studies 40(s1): 5467.
Minozzi, W. (2011) “A Jamming Theory of Politics.” Journal of Politics 73(2): 301-15.
Minozzi, W. (2013). “Endogenous Beliefs in Models of Politics.” American Journal of Political Science 57(3): 566–81.
Minozzi, W., Neblo, M. A., and Siegel, D. A.. (2012). “A Theory of Deliberation as Interactive Reasoning.” APSA Annual Meeting.
Minozzi, W., Neblo, M. A., Esterling, K. M., and Lazer, D. M.. (2015). “Field experiment evidence of substantive, attributional, and behavioral persuasion by members of Congress in online town halls.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112(13): 3937-42.
Muhlberger, P. (n.d.)“Stealth Democracy: Authoritarianism, Parochial Citizens and Deliberation.”
Mutz, D. (2006). Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mutz, D. C. (2002). “The Consequences of Crosscutting Networks for Political Participation.” American Journal of Political Science 46: 838–55.
Mutz, D. C. (2008). “Is Deliberative Democracy a Falsifiable Theory?Annual Review of Political Science 11(1): 521–38.
Neblo, M. A. (2000). Thinking Through Democracy: Deliberative Politics in Theory and Practice. Dissertation, University of Chicago.
Neblo, M. A. (2003). Impassioned Democracy: The Role of Emotion in Deliberative Theory. In Democracy Collaborative Affiliates Conference.
Neblo, M. A. (2004). “Giving Hands and Feet to Morality.” Perspectives on Politics 2(01): 99100.
Neblo, M. A. (2005a). “Thinking Through Democracy: Between the Theory and Practice of Deliberative Politics.” Acta Politica 40(2): 169–81.
Neblo, M. A. (2005b). “The Weight of Passion.” In Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
Neblo, M. A. (2007a). “Family Disputes: Diversity in Defining and Measuring Deliberation.” Swiss Political Science Review 13(4): 527–57.
Neblo, M. A. (2007b). “Change for the Better? Linking the Mechanisms of Deliberative Opinion Change to Normative Theory.” Paper presented to the Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago
Neblo, M. A. (2007c). “Philosophical Psychology with Political Intent.” The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior, pp.25–47.
Neblo, M. A. (2009a). “Three-Fifths a Racist: A Typology for Analyzing Public Opinion About Race.” Political Behavior 31(1): 3151.
Neblo, M. A. (2009b). “Meaning and Measurement: Reorienting the Race Politics Debate.” Political Research Quarterly 62(3): 474–84.
Neblo, M. A. (2011a). “The Virtue of Deliberation: Sophrosyne and Epistemic Democracy.” Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.
Neblo, M. A. (2011b). “Deliberation's Legitmation Crisis.” Critical Review 23(3): 405–19.
Neblo, M. A., Esterling, K., Kennedy, R., Lazer, D., and Sokhey, A.. (2010). “Who Wants to Deliberate – and Why?American Political Science Review 104(3): 566–83.
Neumann, J. von and Morgenstern, O.. (1944). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. New York: Wiley.
Page, B. I. (1996). Who Deliberates?: Mass Media in Modern Democracy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Page, B. I. and Shapiro, R. Y.. (1992). The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Parkinson, J. (2003). “Legitimacy Problems in Deliberative Democracy.” Political Studies 51(1): 180196.
Parkinson, J., and Mansbridge, J., Eds. (2012). Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Patty, J. W. (2008). “Arguments-Based Collective Choice.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 20(4): 379414.
Patty, J. W. and Penn, E. M.. (2010). “A Social Choice Theory of Legitimacy.” Social Choice and Welfare 36(3): 365–82.
Pettit, P. (2001). “Deliberative Democracy and the Discursive Dilemma.” Philosophical Issues 11: 268–99.
Pettit, P. (2003). “Discourse Theory and Republican Liberty.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6: 7295.
Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., and Podsakoff, N. P.. (2003). “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies.” Journal of Applied Psychology. 88 (5): 879903.
Posner, R. (2003). Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Posner, R. (2004). “Smooth Sailing.” Legal Affairs January/February: 4142.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Raskinski, K. A. (1989). “The Effect of Question Wording on Public Support for Government Spending.” Public Opinion Quarterly 53: 388–94.
Riker, W. H. (1980). “Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions.” American Political Science Review 74(2): 432–46.
Riker, W. H. (1982). Liberalism Against Populism: A Confrontation between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
Rokeach, M. (1960). The Open and Closed Mind. New York: Basic Books.
Rorty, R. (1982). Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Sanders, L. M. (1997). “Against Deliberation.” Political Theory 25(3): 347–76.
Sanders, L. M. (1999). “Democratic Politics and Survey Research.” Philosophy and the Social Sciences 29 (2): 248–80.
Satterthwaite, M. A. (1975). “Strategy-Proofness and Arrow's Conditions: Existence and Correspondence Theorems for Voting Procedures and Social Welfare Functions.” Journal of Economic Theory 10(April): 187217.
Scargle, J. D. (2000). “Publication Bias: The ‘File-Drawer Problem’ in Scientific Inference.” Journal of Scientific Exploration 14(2): 94106.
Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The Semisovereign Public: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Schelling, T. (1960/2006). The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Schegloff, E. A. (2000). “Overlapping Talk and the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language in Society 29: 163.
Schuman, H. and Presser, S. (1996). Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording and Context. New York: Sage Publications.
Schumpeter, J. (1942/2008). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.
Searing, D. D., Solt, F., et al. (2007). “Public Discussion in the Deliberative System: Does It Make Better Citizens?British Journal of Political Science 37(4): 587618.
Shepsle, K. A. and Weingast, B. R.. (1984). “Uncovered Sets and Sophisticated Voting Outcomes with Implications for Agenda Institutions.” American Journal of Political Science, 28: 4974.
Skinner, Q. (1974). “Some Problems in the Analysis of Political Thought and Action.” Political Theory 2: 277303.
Sniderman, P. M., Brody, R. A., and Tetlock, P. E.. (1991). Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Steenbergen, M. R., Bächtiger, A., Spörndli, M., and Steiner, J.. (2003). “Measuring Political Deliberation: A Discourse Quality Index.” Comparative European Politics 1(1): 2148.
Steiner, J. (2008). “Concept Stretching: The Case of Deliberation.” European Political Science 7: 186–90.
Steiner, J., Bächtiger, A., Spörndli, M., Steenbergen, M. R.. (2004). Deliberative Politics in Action: Analyzing Parliamentary Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sunstein, C. (2009). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Taylor, Q. P. (2002). “Public Deliberation and Popular Government in Aristotle's ‘Politics’.” Interpretation – A Journal of Political Philosophy 29(3): 241–60.
Thompson, D. F. (2008). “Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 11(1): 497520.
Tocqueville, A. D. ([1835/1840] 1969). Democracy in America. New York: Doubleday.
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., and Moll, H.. (2005). “Understanding and Sharing Intentions: The Origins of Cultural Cognition.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28: 675735.
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D.. (1981). “The Faming of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science 211(4481): 453–58.
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., and Brady, H.. (1995). Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O.. (1944). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. New York: Wiley.
Walzer, M. (1999). “Deliberation and What Else?”In Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, edited by Macedo, Stephen. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wanderer, J. (2008). Robert Brandom. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
Warren, M. (2007). “Institutionalizing Deliberative Democracy.” In Deliberation, Participation, and Democracy: Can the People Govern? edited by Rosenberg, S.. Baskingstoke: Palgrave.
Warren, R. P. (1946). All the King's Men. New York: Harcourt Brace and Company.
Zaller, J. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.