Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Design Creativity
  • Cited by 11
      • Show more authors
      • Open Access
      You have digital access to this book
    • Select format
    • Publisher:
      Cambridge University Press
      Publication date:
      04 June 2024
      27 June 2024
      ISBN:
      9781009325318
      9781009325332
      DOI:
      https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325318
      Creative Commons:
      Creative Common License - CC Creative Common License - BY Creative Common License - NC Creative Common License - ND
      This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0.
      https://creativecommons.org/creativelicenses
      Dimensions:
      Weight & Pages:
      Dimensions:
      (229 x 152 mm)
      Weight & Pages:
      0.07kg, 45 Pages
      • Subjects:
      Medicine: General Interest, Medicine
      Series:
      Elements of Improving Quality and Safety in Healthcare
    Open Access
    You have digital access to this book
    Selected: Digital
    View content
    Add to cart View cart Buy from Cambridge.org
    Subjects:
    Medicine: General Interest, Medicine
    Series:
    Elements of Improving Quality and Safety in Healthcare
    Information

    Book description

    Design creativity describes the process by which needs are explored and translated into requirements for change. This Element examines the role of design creativity within the context of healthcare improvement. It begins by outlining the characteristics of design thinking, and the key status of the Double Diamond Model. It provides practical tools to support design creativity, including ethnographic/observational studies, personas and scenarios, and needs identification and requirements analysis. It also covers brainstorming, Disney, and six thinking hats techniques, the nine windows technique, morphological charts and product architecting, and concept evaluation. The tools, covering all stages of the Double Diamond model, are supported by examples of their use in healthcare improvement. The Element concludes with a critique of design creativity and the evidence for its application in healthcare improvement. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.

    References

    References

    1.Clarkson, J, Bogle, D, Dean, J et al. Engineering Better Care – A Systems Approach to Health and Care Design and Continuous Improvement. London: Royal Academy of Engineering; 2017. https://raeng.org.uk/media/wwko2fs4/final-report-engineering-better-care-version-for-website.pdf (accessed 20 December 2023).
    2.Sarkar, P, Chakrabarti, A. Assessing design creativity. Des Stud 2011; 32(4): 348–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.01.002.
    3.Simon, HA. The science of design: Creating the artificial. Sci Artif 2020; 4(1/2): 67–82. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511391.
    4.Cross, N. The nature and nurture of design ability. Des Stud 1990; 11(3): 127–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(90)90002-T.
    5.Cross, N. Designerly ways of knowing: Design discipline versus design science. Des Issues 2001; 17(3): 49–55. www.jstor.org/stable/1511801.
    6.Rittel, HWJ, Webber, MM. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 1973; 4(2): 155–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730.
    7.Komashie, A, Kotiadis, K, Lamé, G, Clarkson, P. Systems mapping. In Dixon-Woods, M, Brown, K, Marjanovic, S et al., eds. Elements of Improving Quality and Safety in Healthcare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; forthcoming.
    8.Card, A, Ward, J, Risk, Clarkson P. assessment. In Dixon-Woods, M, Brown, K, Marjanovic, S et al., eds. Elements of Improving Quality and Safety in Healthcare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; forthcoming.
    9.King, S, Chang, K. Understanding Industrial Design. Farnham: O’Reilly Media, Inc; 2018.
    10.Waterson, P, Eason, K. ‘1966 and all that’: Trends and developments in UK ergonomics during the 1960s. Ergonomics. 2009; 52(11): 1323–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130903229561.
    11.Hignett, S, Carayon, P, Buckle, P, Catchpole, K. State of science: Human factors and ergonomics in healthcare. Ergonomics 2013; 56(10): 1491–503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2013.822932.
    12.Clarkson, J, Coleman, R. History of inclusive design in the UK. Appl Ergon 2015; 46(Part B): 235–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.002.
    13.Institute BS. British Standard 7000–6:2005. Design Management Systems – Managing Inclusive Design – Guide. London: BSI; 2005. https://doi.org/10.3403/03208286U.
    14.Archer, B. Design as a discipline: Whatever became of design methodology? Des Stud 1979; 1(1): 17–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(79)90023-1.
    15.Lockwood, T. Design Thinking: Integrating Innovation, Customer Experience and Brand Value. New York: Allworth Press; 2009.
    16.Crilly, N. Creativity and fixation in the real world: A literature review of case study research. Des Stud 2019; 64: 154–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.07.002.
    17.Gonçalves, M, Cardoso, C, Badke-Schaub, P. What inspires designers? Preferences on inspirational approaches during idea generation. Des Stud 2014; 35(1): 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2013.09.001.
    18.Eastman, C. New directions in design cognition: Studies of representation and recall. In Eastman, C, Newstetter, W, McCracken, M, eds. Design Knowing and Learning: Cognition in Design Education. Atlanta: Elsevier Science; 2001: 147–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008043868-9/50008-5.
    19.Cai, H, Do, EYL, Zimring, CM. Extended linkography and distance graph in design evaluation: An empirical study of the dual effects of inspiration sources in creative design. Des Stud. 2010; 31(2): 146–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2009.12.003.
    20.Crilly, N. Fixation and creativity in concept development: The attitudes and practices of expert designers. Des Stud. 2015; 38: 54–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.01.002.
    21.Sanders, EBN, Stappers, PJ. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign. 2008; 4(1): 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068.
    22.Brown, T. Design thinking. Harv Bus Rev 2008; 86(6): 84–92. https://hbr.org/2008/06/design-thinking.
    23.Design Council. Eleven lessons: Managing design in eleven global brands; 2005. www.designcouncil.org.uk/fileadmin/uploads/dc/Documents/ElevenLessons_Design_Council%2520%25282%2529.pdf (accessed 20 December 2023).
    24.Langley, GL, Moen, R, Nolan, KM et al. The Improvement Guide: A Practical Approach to Enhancing Organizational Performance. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
    25.Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Quality Improvement Essentials Toolkit; 2017. www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/Tools/Quality-Improvement-Essentials-Toolkit.aspx (accessed 20 December 2023).
    26.Waring, J, Jones, L. Maintaining the link between methodology and method in ethnographic health research. BMJ Qual Saf 2016; 25(7): 556–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005325.
    27.Hammersley, M. Ethnography: Problems and prospects. Ethnogr Educ 2006; 1(1): 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457820500512697.
    28.Lewrick, M, Link, P, Leifer, L. The Design Thinking Playbook: Mindful Digital Transformation of Teams, Products, Services, Businesses and Ecosystems. Oxford: Wiley; 2018.
    29.Martin, B, Hanington, BM. Universal Methods of Design: 100 Ways to Research Complex Problems, Develop Innovative Ideas, and Design Effective Solutions. Beverly, MA: Rockport Publishers; 2012.
    30.Kirwan, B, Ainsworth, LK. A Guide to Task Analysis. Oxford: Taylor & Francis; 1992.
    31.Shepherd, A. Hierarchical Task Analysis. Oxford: Taylor & Francis; 2001.
    32.Jones, A, Hignett, S. Safe access/egress system for emergency ambulances. Emerg Med J 2007; 24(3): 200–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emj.2006.041707.
    33.Hignet, S, Griffiths, P. Manual handling risks in the bariatric (obese) patient pathway in acute sector, community and ambulance care and treatment. Work 2009; 33(2): 175–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2009-0864.
    34.Thorne, E. Development of a Protocol to Evaluate Ambulance Patient Compartments Using Link Analysis and Simulation. Unpublished BSc. dissertation. Dept of Human Sciences, Loughborough University; 2008.
    35.Pruitt, J, Adlin, T. The Essential Persona Lifecycle: Your Guide to Building and Using Personas. London: Morgan Kauffman; 2006.
    36.Jun, GT, Canham, A, Altuna-palacios, A, Ward, JR, Bhamra, R. A participatory systems approach to design for safer integrated medicine management. Ergonomics 2018; 61(1): 48–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2017.1329939.
    37.Jais, C, Hignett, S, Halsall, W et al. Chris and Sally’s house: Adapting a home for people living with dementia (innovative practice). Dementia 2021; 20(2): 770–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301219887040.
    38.Jais, C, Hignett, S, Galindo, Estupiñan Z, Hogervorst, E. Evidence based dementia personas: Human factors design for people living with dementia. In Polak-Sopinska A and Królikowski J, editors. Ergonomics for People with Disabilities. Poland: De Gruyter; 2018: 215–26. https://doi.org/10.2478/9783110617832-018.
    39.Videos created to help families identify care needs of loved ones with dementia. www.lboro.ac.uk/news-events/news/2018/may/video-to-help-identify-demenetia-care-needs/ (Accessed 24 May 2023).
    40.Tizani, W. Engineering design. In Aouad, G, Lee, A, Wu, S, editors. Constructing the Future: nD Modelling. Dordrecht: Routledge; 2006: 14–39. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203967461.
    41.Hauser, JR, Clausing, D. The house of quality. Harv Bus Rev 1988; https://hbr.org/1988/05/the-house-of-quality.
    42.Camgöz‐Akdağ, H, Tarım, M, Lonial, S, Yatkın, A. QFD application using SERVQUAL for private hospitals: A case study. Leadersh Heal Serv 2013; 26(3): 175–83. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHS-02-2013-0007.
    43.Osborn, A. Applied Imagination. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons; 1953.
    44.Dilts, R. Strategies of Genius. Capitola, California: Meta; 1994.
    45.De Bono, E. Six Thinking Hats. London: Penguin; 2000.
    46.Altshuller, G. And Suddenly the Inventor Appeared: TRIZ, the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving. Worcester, MA: Technical Innovation Center; 1996.
    47.Zwincky, F. The morphological approach to discovery, invention, research and construction. In Zwicky, F, Wilson, AG, editors. New Methods of Thought and Procedure – Contributions to the Symposium on Methodologies. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin; 1967; 273–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-87617-2.
    48.Carter, M, Lyle, R, Watt, K, Hogg, J, Melville, D. FFP3 facemask redesign. Industrial Group Project (DM403) Undertaken at the Department of Design, Manufacturing and Engineering Management, University of Strathclyde, in Partnership with Health Protection Scotland and NHS Health Scotland; 2016. https://issuu.com/matthewddcarter/docs/group_6_industrial_project_folio (accessed 15 January 2024).
    49.Álvarez, A, Ritchey, T. Applications of general morphological analysis – From engineering design to policy analysis. Acta Morphol Gen 2015; 4(1): 1–40. www.swemorph.com/amg/pdf/amg-4-1-2015.pdf.
    50.Turley, RE, Richardson, WC, Hansen, JV. Morphological analysis for health care systems planning. Socioecon Plann Sci 1975; 9(2): 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0121(75)90013-0.
    51.FDA. Design Control Guidance for Medical Device Manufacturers; 1998. www.fda.gov/media/116573/download (accessed 19 December 2023).
    52.Clegg, D, Barker, R. Case Method Fast-Track: A RAD Approach. Boston: Addison-Wesley Longman; 1994.
    53.Health Product People: Designing and Delivering Better Health and Care Digital Services. https://digitalhealth.blog.gov.uk/2018/11/12/health-product-people-designing-and-delivering-better-health-and-care-digital-services/ (accessed 1 February 2022).
    54.Komashie, A, Ward, J, Bashford, T et al. Systems approach to health service design, delivery and improvement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2021; 11(1): e037667. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037667.
    55.Clarkson, PJ, Buckle, P, Coleman, R et al. Design for patient safety: A review of the effectiveness of design in the UK health service. J Eng Des 2004; 15(2): 123–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820310001617711.
    56.Hignett, S, Jones, EL, Miller, D et al. Human factors and ergonomics and quality improvement science: Integrating approaches for safety in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf 2015; 24(4): 250–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003623.
    57.Jun, GT, Morrison, C, Clarkson, PJ. Articulating current service development practices: A qualitative analysis of eleven mental health projects. BMC Health Serv Res 2014; 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-20.
    58.Amabile, TM, Schatzel, EA, Moneta, GB, Kramer, SJ. Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. Leadersh Q 2004; 15(1): 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.003.
    59.Massey, C, Munt, D. Preparing to be creative in the NHS: Making it personal. Heal Care Anal 2009; 17(4): 296–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-009-0132-1.
    60.Cramm, JM, Strating, MMH, Bal, R, Nieboer, AP. A large-scale longitudinal study indicating the importance of perceived effectiveness, organizational and management support for innovative culture. Soc Sci Med 2013; 83: 119–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.01.017.
    61.Jun, GT, Morris, Z, Eldabi, T et al. Development of modelling method selection tool for health services management: From problem structuring methods to modelling and simulation methods. BMC Health Serv Res 2011; 11(108). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-108.
    62.Ibrahim Shire, M, Jun, GT, Moon, S, Robinson, S. A system dynamics approach to workload management of hospital pharmacy staff: Modelling the trade-off between dispensing backlog and dispensing errors. IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors 2019; 6(3–4): 209–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2018.1555563.
    63.Helix Center. https://helixcentre.com/ (accessed 14 September 2023).
    64.Clinical Engineering Innovation. www.cuh.nhs.uk/our-research/research-facilities/clinical-engineering (accessed 4 January 2024).
    65.Buckle, P, Clarkson, PJ, Coleman, R et al. Design for Patient Safety: A System-Wide Design-Led Approach to Tackling Patient Safety in the NHS, Department of Health and the Design Council, London; 2003.
    66.Brown, T, Martin, R. Design for action: How to use design thinking to make great things actually happen. Harv Bus Rev 2015; 56–64. https://hbr.org/2015/09/design-for-action.
    67.Burns, C, Cottam, H, Vanstone, C, Winhall, J. RED Paper 02: Transformation Design. Design Council, London; 2006.
    68.Cottam, H, Leadbeater, C. RED Paper 01 Health: Cocreating Services. Design Council, London; 2004.
    69.Design Council. Eleven Lessons Managing Design in Eleven Global Companies. Design Council, London; 2007.
    70.Kolko, J. Design thinking comes of age. Harv Bus Rev 2015; 66–71. https://hbr.org/2015/09/design-thinking-comes-of-age.

    Metrics

    Altmetric attention score

    Full text views

    Total number of HTML views: 0
    Total number of PDF views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    Book summary page views

    Total views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    * Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

    Usage data cannot currently be displayed.

    Accessibility standard: Unknown

    Why this information is here

    This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

    Accessibility Information

    Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.