Skip to main content
×
×
Home
The Ecological Implications of Body Size
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1744
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Immonen, Elina Hämäläinen, Anni Schuett, Wiebke and Tarka, Maja 2018. Evolution of sex-specific pace-of-life syndromes: genetic architecture and physiological mechanisms. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, Vol. 72, Issue. 3,

    Reid, Audrey Helen and Sprules, W. Gary 2018. A comprehensive evaluation of Daphnia pulex foraging energetics and the influence of spatially heterogeneous food. Inland Waters, Vol. 8, Issue. 1, p. 50.

    Evans, Thomas Kumschick, Sabrina Şekercioğlu, Çağan H. Blackburn, Tim M. and Strubbe, Diederik 2018. Identifying the factors that determine the severity and type of alien bird impacts. Diversity and Distributions, Vol. 24, Issue. 6, p. 800.

    Puttick, M. N. 2018. Mixed evidence for early bursts of morphological evolution in extant clades. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 31, Issue. 4, p. 502.

    Dunck, Bárbara Amaral, Diogo Castanho Fernandes, Ubirajara Lima Santana, Natália Fernanda Lopes, Taise Miranda and Rodrigues, Liliana 2018. Herbivory effects on the periphytic algal functional diversity in lake ecosystems: an experimental approach. Hydrobiologia, Vol. 816, Issue. 1, p. 231.

    Alhajeri, Bader H. and Steppan, Scott J. 2018. Ecological and Ecomorphological Specialization Are Not Associated with Diversification Rates in Muroid Rodents (Rodentia: Muroidea). Evolutionary Biology,

    Hallmann, Konstantin and Griebeler, Eva Maria 2018. An exploration of differences in the scaling of life history traits with body mass within reptiles and between amniotes. Ecology and Evolution,

    Horne, Curtis R. Hirst, Andrew G. Atkinson, David and Bell, James R. 2018. Insect temperature-body size trends common to laboratory, latitudinal and seasonal gradients are not found across altitudes. Functional Ecology, Vol. 32, Issue. 4, p. 948.

    Douhard, Mathieu Guillemette, Simon Festa-Bianchet, Marco and Pelletier, Fanie 2018. Drivers and demographic consequences of seasonal mass changes in an alpine ungulate. Ecology, Vol. 99, Issue. 3, p. 724.

    Prechtel, Austin R. Coulter, Alison A. Etchison, Luke Jackson, P. Ryan and Goforth, Reuben R. 2018. Range estimates and habitat use of invasive Silver Carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix): evidence of sedentary and mobile individuals. Hydrobiologia, Vol. 805, Issue. 1, p. 203.

    Ferrón, Humberto G. Holgado, Borja Liston, Jeffrey J. Martínez-Pérez, Carlos Botella, Héctor and Cavin, Lionel 2018. Assessing metabolic constraints on the maximum body size of actinopterygians: locomotion energetics of Leedsichthys problematicus (Actinopterygii, Pachycormiformes). Palaeontology,

    Martin, Robert A. 2018. Scaling of species diversity and body mass in mammals: Cope’s rule and the evolutionary cost of large size. Historical Biology, p. 1.

    Rizzuto, Matteo Carbone, Chris and Pawar, Samraat 2018. Foraging constraints reverse the scaling of activity time in carnivores. Nature Ecology & Evolution, Vol. 2, Issue. 2, p. 247.

    Fritschie, Keith J. and Olden, Julian D. 2018. Estimating the effects of non-native species on nutrient recycling using species-specific and general allometric models. Freshwater Biology, Vol. 63, Issue. 6, p. 539.

    Witting, Lars 2018. The natural selection of metabolism explains curvature in allometric scaling. Oikos,

    Laiolo, Paola Pato, Joaquina Obeso, José Ramón and Coulson, Tim 2018. Ecological and evolutionary drivers of the elevational gradient of diversity. Ecology Letters,

    McGarvey, Richard Dowling, Natalie and Cohen, Joel E. 2018. Two Processes Regulating Trophic Energy Flow in Pelagic and Terrestrial Ecosystems: Trophic Efficiency and Body Size–Dependent Biomass Production: (A Reply to Giacomini). The American Naturalist, Vol. 191, Issue. 3, p. 364.

    Turk, Eva Kuntner, Matjaž and Kralj-Fišer, Simona 2018. Cross-sex genetic correlation does not extend to sexual size dimorphism in spiders. The Science of Nature, Vol. 105, Issue. 1-2,

    Herrmann, John D. Haddad, Nick M. and Levey, Douglas J. 2018. Mean body size predicts colony performance in the common eastern bumble bee (Bombus impatiens ). Ecological Entomology,

    Tavares, William Corrêa Abi-Rezik, Pedro and Seuánez, Hector N. 2018. Historical and ecological influence in the evolutionary diversification of external morphology of neotropical spiny rats (Echimyidae, Rodentia). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research,

    ×
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    The Ecological Implications of Body Size
    • Online ISBN: 9780511608551
    • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511608551
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to *
    ×
  • Buy the print book

Book description

It is generally recognized that larger animals eat more, live longer, have larger offspring, and so on; but it is unusual to see these commonplace observations as a basis for scientific biology. A large number of empirically based relationships describe biological rates as simple functions of body size; and other such relations predict the intrinsic rate of population growth, animal speed, animal density, territory size, prey size, physiology, and morphology. Such equations almost always exist for mammals and birds, often for other vertebrates and invertebrates, sometimes for protozoa, algae, and bacteria, and occasionally even for plants. There are too many organisms to measure all aspects of the biology of every species of population, so scientists must depend on generalizations. Body size relations represent our most extensive and powerful assemblage of generalizations, but they have never been organized for use in ecology. This book represents the largest single compilation of interspecific size relations, and instructs the reader on the use of these relationships; their comparison, combination, and criticism. Both strengths and weaknesses of our current knowledge are discussed in order to indicate the many possible directions for further research. This important volume will therefore provide a point of departure toward a new applied ecology, giving quantitative solutions to real questions. It will interest advanced students of ecology and comparative physiology as well as professional biologists.

Reviews

‘ … [Peters] has built a brief and engaging quantitative monograph, frank, learned, painstaking and made explicitly helpful to readers with little mathematical experience … His text is an unequaled review of the field …’

Source: Scientific American

‘ … Here is a treasure house of information … Clearly this is an important book. It is different - and by ignoring cherished disciplines, by blending physiology and ecology, and by looking at problems with a fresh eye, Peters yields new insights and opens up new questions.’

Source: Nature

‘Peters has produced both a useful introduction to the relationships of body size to several physiological, ecological, and biomechanical processes as well as a source of data on these matters … Peter’s approach is effective, and this small volume could be used in graduate seminars as well as in advanced undergraduate courses in ecology and related subjects.’

Source: Choice

Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 468 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 2217 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.