Skip to main content
×
Home
Embryology, Epigenesis and Evolution
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 76
  • Cited by
    This book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Alvargonzález, David 2016. The Constitution of the Human Embryo as Substantial Change. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, Vol. 41, Issue. 2, p. 172.


    Brigandt, Ingo 2016. Do we need a ‘theory’ of development?. Biology & Philosophy, Vol. 31, Issue. 4, p. 603.


    Pradeu, T. 2016. Toolbox murders: putting genes in their epigenetic and ecological contexts. Biology & Philosophy, Vol. 31, Issue. 1, p. 125.


    Brigandt, Ingo 2015. Social values influence the adequacy conditions of scientific theories: beyond inductive risk. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 45, Issue. 3, p. 326.


    D'Ambrosio, Paolo 2015. A HEURISTIC SCIENCE-BASED NATURALISM AS A PARTNER FOR THEOLOGICAL REFLECTIONS ON THE NATURAL WORLD. Zygon®, Vol. 50, Issue. 4, p. 962.


    Griffiths, Paul E and Hochman, Adam 2015. eLS.


    Lickliter, Robert and Honeycutt, Hunter 2015. Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science.


    Lowe, James W. E. 2015. Managing variation in the investigation of organismal development: problems and opportunities. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, Vol. 37, Issue. 4, p. 449.


    Marshall, Peter J. 2015. Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science.


    Meloni, Maurizio 2015. Epigenetics for the social sciences: justice, embodiment, and inheritance in the postgenomic age. New Genetics and Society, Vol. 34, Issue. 2, p. 125.


    Minelli, Alessandro 2015. Grand challenges in evolutionary developmental biology. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 2,


    Molenaar, Peter C.M. 2015. An Interpretation of Part of Gilbert Gottlieb’s Legacy: Developmental Systems Theory Contra Developmental Behavior Genetics. International Journal of Developmental Science, Vol. 9, Issue. 1, p. 5.


    Overton, Willis F. 2015. Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science.


    Santos, Gil C. 2015. Ontological Emergence: How is That Possible? Towards a New Relational Ontology. Foundations of Science, Vol. 20, Issue. 4, p. 429.


    Sokol, Bryan W. Hammond, Stuart I. Kuebli, Janet and Sweetman, Leah 2015. Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science.


    Yoshida, Yoshinari and Nakao, Hisashi 2015. EvoDevo as a Motley Aggregation: Local Integration and Conflicting Views of Genes During the 1980s. Biological Theory, Vol. 10, Issue. 2, p. 156.


    Bolker, Jessica A. 2014. Model species in evo-devo: a philosophical perspective. Evolution & Development, Vol. 16, Issue. 1, p. 49.


    Dupré, John 2014. The role of behaviour in the recurrence of biological processes. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, Vol. 112, Issue. 2, p. 306.


    Greenberg, Gary 2014. How New Ideas in Physics and Biology Influence Developmental Science. Research in Human Development, Vol. 11, Issue. 1, p. 5.


    Meloni, Maurizio 2014. How biology became social, and what it means for social theory. The Sociological Review, Vol. 62, Issue. 3, p. 593.


    ×
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    Embryology, Epigenesis and Evolution
    • Online ISBN: 9780511498541
    • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498541
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to? *
    ×
  • Buy the print book

Book description

Historically, philosophers of biology have tended to sidestep the problem of development by focusing primarily on evolutionary biology and, more recently, on molecular biology and genetics. Quite often too, development has been misunderstood as simply, or even primarily, a matter of gene activation and regulation. Nowadays a growing number of philosophers of science are focusing their analyses on the complexities of development, and in Embryology, Epigenesis and Evolution Jason Scott Robert explores the nature of development against current trends in biological theory and practice and looks at the interrelations between development and evolution (evo-devo), an area of resurgent biological interest. Clearly written, this book should be of interest to students and professionals in the philosophy of science and the philosophy of biology.

Reviews

'The dust jacket of Embryology, Epigenesis, and Evolution suggests a target audience of philosophers of science and of biology, but I hope the book will be more widely read. It might start a productive exchange between biologists and philosophers on how to overcome the limitations of our knowledge.'

Source: Science

'… exceptionally lucid'.

Source: Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews

'Robert is a well published philosopher of biology who has tackled what he sees as genomania in the disciplines of developmental and evolutionary biology. … Robert switches back and forth from philosophical analysis to biological examples, which I found to be an interesting and intellectually stimulating format. … Robert presents his arguments clearly and concisely … I recommend that you read this book for its philosophical analyses and, if you are not already, start taking development seriously.'

Source: TRENDS in Ecology and Evolution

    • Aa
    • Aa
Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send:
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.


R. Amundson (1994). Two conceptions of constraint: Adaptationism and the challenge from developmental biology. Philosophy of Science, 61, 556–578

M. J. Apter , and L. Wolpert (1965). Cybernetics and development, I: Information theory. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 8, 244–257

W. Arthur (2000). The concept of developmental reprogramming and the quest for an inclusive theory of evolutionary mechanisms. Evolution & Development, 2, 49–57

W. Arthur (2002). The emerging conceptual framework of evolutionary developmental biology. Nature, 415, 757–764

W. R. Atchley , and B. K. Hall (1991). A model for development and evolution of complex morphological structures. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 66, 101–157

W. Bains (2001). The parts list of life. Nature Biotechnology, 19, 401–402

W. Bechtel (1993). Integrating disciplines by creating new disciplines: The case of cell biology. Biology and Philosophy, 8, 277–329

J. A. Bolker , (1995). Model systems in developmental biology. BioEssays, 17, 451–455

J. A. Bolker (2000). Modularity in development and why it matters to evo-devo. American Zoologist, 40, 770–776

P. M. Brakefield (1998). The evolution-development interface and advances with the eyespot patterns of Bicyclus butterflies. Heredity, 80, 265–272

P. M. Brakefield (2001). Structure of a character and the evolution of butterfly eyespot patterns. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular and Developmental Evolution), 291, 93–104

P. M. Brakefield , and V. French (1999). Butterfly wings: The evolution and development of colour patterns. BioEssays, 21, 391–401

P. M. Brakefield , J. Gates , D. Keys , F. Kesbeke , P. J. Wijngaarden , A. Monteiro , V. French , and S. B. Carroll (1996). Development, plasticity and evolution of butterfly eyespot patterns. Nature, 384, 236–242

P. M. Brakefield , and F. Kesbeke (1997). Genotype-environment interactions for insect growth in constant and fluctuating temperature regimes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 264, 717–723

P. M. Brakefield , F. Kesbeke , and P. B. Koch (1998). The regulation of phenotypic plasticity of eyespots in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. American Naturalist, 152, 853–860

S. Brenner (1974). New directions in molecular biology. Nature, 248, 785–787

P. Brylski , and B. K. Hall (1988a). Ontogeny of a macroevolutionary phenotype: The external cheek pouches of geomyoid rodents. Evolution, 42, 391–395

P. Brylski , and B. K. Hall (1988b). Epithelial behaviors and threshold effects in the development and evolution of internal and external cheek pouches in rodents. Zeitschrift fur zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung, 26, 144–154

G. Budd (1999). Does evolution in body patterning drive morphological change – or vice versa? BioEssays, 21, 326–332

A. C. Burke (1991). The development and evolution of the turtle body plan: Inferring intrinsic aspects of the evolutionary process from experimental embryology. American Zoologist, 31, 616–627

L. Chen , M. Krause , B. Draper , H. Weintraub , and A. Fire (1992). Body-wall muscle formation in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos that lack the MyoD homolog hlh-1. Science, 256, 240–243

L. Darden , and N. Maull (1977). Interfield theories. Philosophy of Science, 44, 43–64

G. Dassow , and E. Munro (1999). Modularity in animal development and evolution: Elements of a conceptual framework for evodevo. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular and Developmental Evolution), 285, 307–325

G. Dover (2000). How genomic and developmental dynamics affect evolutionary processes. BioEssays, 22, 1153–1159

L. C. Dunn (1917). Nucleus and cytoplasm as vehicles of heredity. American Naturalist, 51, 286–300

R. Falk (1991). The dominance of traits in genetic analysis. Journal of the History of Biology, 24, 457–484

G. Fusco (2001). How many processes are responsible for phenotypic evolution? Evolution & Development, 3, 279–286

K. Gaertner (1990). A third component causing random variability beside environment and genotype: A reason for the limited success of a 30 year long effort to standardize laboratory animals? Laboratory Animals, 24, 71–77

L. Gannett (1999). What's in a cause? The pragmatic dimensions of genetic explanations. Biology & Philosophy, 14, 349–374

S. M. Gasser , R. Paro , F. Stewart , and R. Aasland (1998). The genetics of epigenetics. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 54, 1–5

W. J. Gehring (1985). The homeo box: A key to the understanding of development? Cell, 40, 3–5

S. F. Gilbert (1991a). Epigenetic landscaping: Waddington's use of cell fate bifurcation diagrams. Biology & Philosophy, 6, 135–154

S. F. Gilbert (2000b). Diachronic biology meets evo-devo: C. H. Waddington's approach to evolutionary developmental biology. American Zoologist, 40, 729–737

S. F. Gilbert (2001). Ecological developmental biology: Developmental biology meets the real world. Developmental Biology, 233, 1–12

S. F. Gilbert (2003). Evo-devo, devo-evo, and devgen-popgen. Biology & Philosophy, 18, 347–352

S. F. Gilbert , and J. A. Bolker (2001). Homologies of process and modular elements of embryonic construction. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular and Developmental Evolution), 291, 1–12

S. F. Gilbert , and E. M. Jorgensen (1998). Wormholes: A commentary on K. F. Schaffner's ‘Genes, behavior, and developmental emergentism’. Philosophy of Science, 65, 259–266

S. F. Gilbert , G. A. Loredo , A. Brukman , and A. C. Burke (2001). Morphogenesis of the turtle shell: The development of a novel structure in tetrapod evolution. Evolution & Development, 3, 47–58

S. F. Gilbert , J. M. Opitz , and R. A. Raff (1996). Resynthesizing evolutionary and developmental biology. Developmental Biology, 173, 357–372

S. F. Gilbert , and S. Sarkar (2000). Embracing complexity: Organicism for the 21st century. Developmental Dynamics, 219, 1–9

P. Godfrey-Smith (2000). Explanatory symmetries, preformation, and developmental systems theory. Philosophy of Science (Proceedings), 67, S322–S331

H. H. Goldsmith , I. I. Gottesman , and K. S. Lemery (1997). Epigenetic approaches to developmental psychopathology. Development & Psychopathology, 9, 365–387

G. Gottlieb (1995). Some conceptual deficiencies in ‘developmental’ behavior genetics. Human Development, 38, 131–141

G. Gottlieb (1998). Normally occurring environmental and behavioral influences on gene activity: From Central Dogma to probabilistic epigenesis. Psychological Review, 105, 792–802

G. Gottlieb (2002). On the epigenetic evolution of species-specific perception: The developmental manifold concept. Cognitive Development, 17, 1287–1300

S. J. Gould , and R. C. Lewontin (1979). The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 205, 581–598

J. Griesemer (1998). Turning back to go forward. Biology & Philosophy, 13, 103–112

P. E. Griffiths , and R. Gray (1994). Developmental systems and evolutionary explanation. Journal of Philosophy, 91, 277–304

P. E. Griffiths , and R. Gray (1997). Replicator 2 – Judgement Day. Biology & Philosophy, 12, 471–492

P. E. Griffiths , and R. D. Knight (1998). What is the developmentalist challenge? Philosophy of Science, 65, 253–258

P. E. Griffiths , and E. M. Neumann-Held (1999). The many faces of the gene. BioScience, 49, 656–674

B. K. Hall (1992a). Waddington's legacy in development and evolution. American Zoologist, 32, 113–122

B. K. Hall (1998). Epigenetics: Regulation not replication. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 11, 201–205

B. K. Hall (2000a). Evo-devo or devo-evo – Does it matter? Evolution & Development, 2, 177–178

B. K. Hall (2000b). Balfour, Garstang and de Beer: The first century of evolutionary embryology. American Zoologist, 40, 718–728

B. K. Hall (2003). Opening the black box between genotype and phenotype: Cells and cell condensations as fundamental units of evolutionary developmental biology. Biology & Philosophy, 18, 219–247

B. K. Hall , and T. Miyake (1992). The membranous skeleton: The role of cell condensations in vertebrate skeletogenesis. Anatomy and Embryology, 186, 107–124

B. K. Hall , and T. Miyake (2000). All for one and one for all: Condensations and the initiation of skeletal development. BioEssays, 22, 138–147

D. Hamer (2002). Rethinking behavior genetics. Science, 298, 71–72

R. G. Harrison (1918). Experiments on the development of the fore limb of Amblystoma, a self-differentiating equipotential system. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 25, 413–461

R. G. Harrison (1937). Embryology and its relations. Science, 85, 369–374

S. Henikoff , and M. A. Matzke (1997). Exploring and explaining epigenetic effects. Trends in Genetics, 13, 293–295

R. Holliday (1987). The inheritance of epigenetic defects. Science, 238, 163–170

R. Holliday (1994). Epigenetics: An overview. Developmental Genetics, 15, 453–457

D. L. Hull (1998). A clash of paradigms or the sound of one hand clapping. Biology & Philosophy, 13, 587–595

P. Humphreys (1996). Aspects of emergence. Philosophical Topics, 24, 53–70

International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. (2001). Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature, 409, 860–921

E. Jablonka , and M. J. Lamb (1998). Epigenetic inheritance in evolution. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 11, 159–183

E. Jablonka , and M. J. Lamb (2002). Creating bridges or rifts? Developmental systems theory and evolutionary developmental biology. BioEssays, 24, 290–291

W. R. Jeffery (2001). Cavefish as a model system in evolutionary developmental biology. Developmental Biology, 231, 1–12

T. D. Johnston , (1987). The persistence of dichotomies in the study of behavioral development. Developmental Review, 7, 149–182

T. D. Johnston , and L. Edwards (2002). Genes, interactions, and the development of behaviour. Psychological Review, 109, 26–34

T. D. Johnston , and G. Gottlieb (1990). Neophenogenesis: A developmental theory of phenotypic evolution. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 147, 471–495

E. F. Keller (1998). Structures of heredity. Biology & Philosophy, 13, 113–118

E. F. Keller (1999). Understanding development. Biology & Philosophy, 14, 321–330

L. Keller , and K. G. Ross (1993). Phenotypic plasticity and ‘cultural transmission’ of alternative social organisations in the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Behavioural Ecology & Sociobiology, 33, 121–129

D. N. Keys , D. L. Lewis , J. E. Selegue , B. J. Pearson , L. V. Goodrich , R. L. Johnson , J. Gates , M. P. Scott , and S. B. Carroll (1999). Recruitment of a hedgehog regulatory circuit in butterfly eyespot evolution. Science, 283, 532–534

J. Kim (1999). Making sense of emergence. Philosophical Studies, 95, 3–36

M. Kirschner , and J. Gerhart (1998). Evolvability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A., 95, 8420–8427

K. N. Laland , F. J. Odling-Smee , and M. W. Feldman (1999). Evolutionary consequences of niche construction and their implications for ecology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A., 96, 10242–10247

M. D. Laubichler , and G. P. Wagner (2001). How molecular is molecular developmental biology? A reply to Alex Rosenberg's ‘Reductionism redux: Computing the embryo’. Biology & Philosophy, 16, 53–68

B. Lewin (1998). The mystique of epigenetics. Cell, 93, 301–303

E. B. Lewis (1978). A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila. Nature, 276, 565–570

E. B. Lewis (1994). Homeosis: The first 100 years. Trends in Genetics, 10, 341–343

R. C. Lewontin (1970). The units of selection. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1, 1–18

R. C. Lewontin (1978). Adaptation. Scientific American, 239, 156–169

R. Lickliter (2000). An ecological approach to behavioral development: Insights from comparative psychology. Ecological Psychology, 12, 319–334

E. A. Lloyd (1999). Evolutionary psychology: The burden of proof. Biology & Philosophy, 14, 211–233

A. C. Love (2003). Evolutionary morphology, innovation, and the synthesis of evolutionary and developmental biology. Biology & Philosophy, 18, 309–345

E. Marshall (2000). Rival genome sequencers celebrate a milestone together. Science, 288, 2294–2295

Maynard J. Smith (1990). Models of a dual inheritance system. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 143, 41–53

Maynard J. Smith (2000a). The concept of information in biology. Philosophy of Science, 67, 177–194

Maynard J. Smith (2000b). Reply to commentaries. Philosophy of Science, 67, 214–218

R. A. McCain (1980). Critical reflections on sociobiology. Review of Social Economy, 38, 123–139

J. F. McClendon (1910). The development of isolated blastomeres of the frog's egg. American Journal of Anatomy, 10, 425–430

W. McGinnis , M. S. Levine , E. Hafen , A. Kuroiwa , and W. J. Gehring (1984). A conserved DNA sequence in homeotic genes of the Drosophila antennapedia and Bithorax complex. Nature, 308, 428–433

P. C. M. Molenaar , D. I. Boomsma , and C. V. Dolan (1993). A third source of developmental differences. Behavior Genetics, 23, 519–524

T. H. Morgan (1932a). The rise of genetics, I. Science, 76, 261–267

M. L. Moss (1981). Genetics, epigenetics, and causation. American Journal of Orthodontics, 80, 366–375

S. A. Newman , and G. B. Müller (2000). Epigenetic mechanisms of character origination. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular and Developmental Evolution), 288, 304–317

H. F. Nijhout (1990). Metaphors and the role of genes in development. BioEssays, 12, 441–446

H. F. Nijhout (1996). Focus on butterfly eyespot development. Nature, 384, 209–210

F. J. Odling-Smee , K. N. Laland , and M. W. Feldman (1996). Niche construction. American Naturalist, 147, 641–648

C. Oosterhout , and P. M. Brakefield (1999). Quantitative genetic variation in Bicyclus anynana metapopulation. Netherlands Journal of Zoology, 49, 67–80

N. H. Patel (1994). Developmental evolution: Insights from studies of insect segmentation. Science, 266, 581–590

E. Pennisi (2000). Embryonic lens prompts eye development. Science, 289, 522–523

K. Peterson , and C. Sapienza (1993). Imprinting the genome: Imprinted genes, imprinting genes, and a hypothesis for their interaction. Annual Review of Genetics, 27, 7–31

A. Petronis (2001). Human morbid genetics revisited: Relevance of epigenetics. Trends in Genetics, 17, 142–146

M. Pigliucci , and C. D. Schlichting (1997). On the limits of quantitative genetics for the study of phenotypic evolution. Acta Biotheoretica, 45, 143–160

C. Pinto-Correia (1999). Strange tales of small men: Homunculi in reproduction. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 42, 225–244

C. Rehmann-Sutter (1996). Frankensteinian knowledge? The Monist, 79, 264–279

R. Riedl (1977). A systems-analytical approach to macro-evolutionary phenomena. Quarterly Review of Biology, 52, 351–370

O. Rieppel (2001). Turtles as hopeful monsters. BioEssays, 23, 987–991

J. S. Robert (2000a). Schizophrenia epigenesis? Theoretical Medicine & Bioethics, 21, 191–215

J. S. Robert (2000c). Fastidious, foundational heresies. Biology & Philosophy, 15, 133–145

J. S. Robert (2001a). Interpreting the homeobox: Metaphors of gene action and activation in development and evolution. Evolution & Development, 3, 287–295

J. S. Robert (2002). How developmental is evolutionary developmental biology? Biology & Philosophy, 17, 591–611

J. S. Robert (2003). Developmental systems and animal behaviour. Biology & Philosophy, 18, 477–489

J. S. Robert , B. K. Hall , and W. M. Olson (2001). Bridging the gap between developmental systems theory and evolutionary developmental biology. BioEssays, 23, 954–962

N. Roll-Hansen (1984). E. S. Russell and J. H. Woodger: The failure of two twentieth-century opponents of mechanistic biology. Journal of the History of Biology, 17, 399–428

A. Rosenberg (1997). Reductionism redux: Computing the embryo. Biology & Philosophy, 12, 445–470

J. C. Roskam , and P. M. Brakefield (1999). Seasonal polyphenism in Bicyclus (Lepidoptera: Satyridae) butterflies: Different climates need different cues. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 66, 345–356

M. Ruse (1975). Woodger on genetics: A critical evaluation. Acta Biotheoretica, 24, 1–13

E. S. Russell (1933). The limitations of analysis in biology. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 33, 147–158

S. Sarkar (1996b). Decoding ‘coding’ – information and DNA. BioScience, 46, 857–864

S. Sarkar (1999). From the Reaktionsnorm to the adaptive norm: The norm of reaction, 1909–1960. Biology & Philosophy, 14, 235–252

S. Sarkar , and J. S. Robert (2003). Editors' introduction [to a special issue on evolution and development]. Biology & Philosophy, 18, 209–217

K. F. Schaffner (1998). Genes, behavior, and developmental emergentism: One process, indivisible? Philosophy of Science, 65, 209–252

C. R. Scriver , and P. J. Waters (1999). Monogenic traits are not simple: Lessons from phenylketonuria. Trends in Genetics, 15, 267–272

K. C. Smith (1992). The new problem of genetics: A response to Gifford. Biology & Philosophy, 7, 431–452

K. C. Smith (1993). Neo-Rationalism vs. Neo-Darwinism: Integrating development and evolution. Biology & Philosophy, 7, 431–451

K. K. Smith , and R. A. Schneider (1998). Have gene knockouts caused evolutionary reversals in the mammalian first arch? BioEssays, 20, 245–255

R. V. Solé , I. Salazar-Ciudad , and S. A. Newman (2000). Gene network dynamics and the evolution of development. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 15, 479–480

R. Spencer-Smith (1994–1995). Reductionism and emergent properties. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 95, 113–129

K. Sterelny (2000a). The ‘genetic program’ program: A commentary on Maynard Smith on information in biology. Philosophy of Science, 67, 195–201

K. Sterelny , and P. Kitcher (1988). The return of the gene. Journal of Philosophy, 85, 339–361

K. Sterelny , K. C. Smith and M. Dickison (1996). The extended replicator. Biology & Philosophy, 11, 377–403

D. L. Stern (2000). Evolutionary developmental biology and the problem of variation. Evolution, 54, 1079–1091

R. C. Strohman (1993). Ancient genomes, wise bodies, unhealthy people: Limits of a genetic paradigm in biology and medicine. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 37, 112–145

R. C. Strohman (1997). Profit margins and epistemology. Nature Biotechnology, 15, 1224–1226

J. C. Venter , M. D. Adams , and E. W. Myers (2001). The sequence of the human genome. Science, 291, 1304–1351

G. Vogel (2000). A mile-high view of development. Science, 288, 2119–2120

C. H. Waddington (1961). Genetic assimilation. Advances in Genetics, 10, 257–293

G. P. Wagner (2000). What is the promise of developmental evolution? Part I: Why is developmental biology necessary to explain evolutionary innovations? Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular and Developmental Evolution), 288, 95–98

G. P. Wagner (2001). What is the promise of developmental evolution? Part II: A causal explanation of evolutionary innovations may be impossible. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular and Developmental Evolution), 291, 305–309

G. P. Wagner , M. Laubichler , and C.-H. Chiu (2000). Developmental evolution as a mechanistic science: The inference from developmental mechanisms to evolutionary processes. American Zoologist, 40, 819–831

D. Wahlsten , (1990). Insensitivity of the analysis of variance to heredity-environment interaction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 109–161

K. M. Weiss , and S. M. Fullerton (2000). Phenogenetic drift and the evolution of genotype-phenotype relationships. Theoretical Population Biology, 57, 187–195

M. J. West , and A. P. King (1987). Settling nature and nurture into an ontogenetic niche. Developmental Psychobiology, 20, 549–562

M.-J. West-Eberhard (1998). Evolution in the light of developmental and cell biology, and vice versa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A., 95, 8417–8419

W. C. Wimsatt (1999). Genes, memes and cultural heredity. Biology & Philosophy, 14, 279–310

R. G. Winther (2001). Varieties of modules: kinds, levels, origins and behaviors. Journal of Experimental Zoology (Molecular and Developmental Evolution), 291, 116–129

U. Wolf (1995). The genetic contribution to the phenotype. Human Genetics, 95, 127–148

L. Wolpert (1994). Do we understand development? Science, 266, 571–572

Y. Yamamoto , and W. R. Jeffery (2000). Central role for the lens in cave fish eye degeneration. Science, 289, 631–633

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 31 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 48 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 27th April 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.