References
Anderson, P. W. (1972). More is different. Science, 177 (4047), 393–396.
Aoki, S., Boyd, G., Burkhalter, R. et al. (2000). Quenched light hadron spectrum. Physical Review Letters, 84 (2), 238.
Ardourel, V. (2018). The infinite limit as an eliminable approximation for phase transitions. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 62, 71–84.
Asakawa, M., Nakahara, Y., & Hatsuda, T. (2001). Maximum entropy analysis of the spectral functions in lattice QCD. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, 46 (2), 459–508.
Bain, J. (2013a). Effective field theories. In Batterman, R. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of physics (pp. 224–254). Oxford University Press.
Bain, J. (2013b). Emergence in effective field theories. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 3 (3), 257–273.
Bain, J. (2016). Emergence and mechanism in the fractional quantum hall effect. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 56, 27–38.
Bangu, S. (2009). Understanding thermodynamic singularities: Phase transitions, data, and phenomena. Philosophy of Science, 76 (4), 488–505.
Bangu, S. (2015). Why does water boil? Fictions in scientific explanation. In Mäki, U., Votsis, I., Ruphy, S., & Schurz, G. (Eds.), Recent developments in the philosophy of science: EPSA 13 Helsinki (pp. 319–330). Springer.
Batterman, R. W. (1995). Theories between theories: Asymptotic limiting intertheoretic relations. Synthese, 103 (2), 171–201.
Batterman, R. W. (2001). The devil in the details: Asymptotic reasoning in explanation, reduction, and emergence. Oxford University Press.
Batterman, R. W. (2005). Critical phenomena and breaking drops: Infinite idealizations in physics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 36 (2), 225–244.
Batterman, R. W. (2011). Emergence, singularities, and symmetry breaking. Foundations of Physics, 41 (6), 1031–1050.
Batterman, R. W. (2017). Philosophical implications of Kadanoff’s work on the renormalization group. Journal of Statistical Physics, 167 (3–4), 559–574.
Batterman, R. W. (2019). Universality and RG explanations. Perspectives on Science, 27 (1), 26–47.
Batterman, R. W., & Rice, C. C. (2014). Minimal model explanations. Philosophy of Science, 81 (3), 349–376.
Bayha, L., Holten, M., Klemt, R. et al. (2020). Observing the emergence of a quantum phase transition shell by shell. Nature, 587 (7835), 583–587.
Bedau, M. (2002). Downward causation and the autonomy of weak emergence. Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology, 6 (1), 5–50.
Berry, M. V. (2002). Singular limits. Physics Today, 55 (5), 10–11.
Blackmore, J. T. (1995). Ludwig Boltzmann: His later life and philosophy, 1900–1906: Book two: The philosopher (Vol. 174). Springer Science & Business Media.
Borrmann, P., Mülken, O., & Harting, J. (2000). Classification of phase transitions in small systems. Physical Review Letters, 84 (16), 3511.
Broad, C. D. (1925 [2014]). The mind and its place in nature. Routledge.
Brown, H. R., & Uffink, J. (2001). The origins of time-asymmetry in thermodynamics: The minus first law. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 32 (4), 525–538.
Brush, S. G. (2006). Ludwig Boltzmann and the foundations of natural science. In Fasol-Boltzmann, I. M. & Fasol, G. L. (Eds.), Ludwig Boltzmann (1844–1906) (pp. 65–80). Springer.
Butterfield, J. (2011a). Emergence, reduction and supervenience: A varied landscape. Foundations of Physics, 41 (6), 920–959.
Butterfield, J. (2011b). Less is different: Emergence and reduction reconciled. Foundations of Physics, 41 (6), 1065–1135.
Butterfield, J. (2014). Reduction, emergence, and renormalization. The Journal of Philosophy, 111 (1), 5–49.
Callender, C. (1999). Reducing thermodynamics to statistical mechanics: The case of entropy. The Journal of Philosophy, 96 (7), 348–373.
Cao, T. Y., & Schweber, S. S. (1993). The conceptual foundations and the philosophical aspects of renormalization theory. Synthese, 97 (1), 33–108.
Casetti, L., Pettini, M., & Cohen, E. (2003). Phase transitions and topology changes in configuration space. Journal of Statistical Physics, 111 (5), 1091–1123.
Castellani, E. (2002). Reductionism, emergence, and effective field theories. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 33 (2), 251–267.
Chalmers, D. J. (2006). Strong and weak emergence. In Davies, P. & Clayton, P. (Eds.) The re-emergence of emergence: The Emergentist Hypothesis From Science to Religion (pp. 244–256) Oxford University Press.
Crowther, K. (2015). Decoupling emergence and reduction in physics. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 5 (3), 419–445.
Crowther, K. (2020). What is the point of reduction in science? Erkenntnis, 85, 1437–1460.
Curie, P. (1895). Propriétés magnétiques des corps a diverses températures. Gauthier-Villars et fils.
Dizadji-Bahmani, F., Frigg, R., & Hartmann, S. (2010). Who’s afraid of Nagelian reduction? Erkenntnis, 73 (3), 393–412.
Ellis, G. F. (2020). Emergence in solid state physics and biology. Foundations of Physics, 50 (10), 1098–1139.
Fisher, M. E. (1974). Critical point phenomena–the role of series expansions. The Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics, 4(2), 181–202.
Fisher, M. E. (1998). Renormalization group theory: Its basis and formulation in statistical physics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 70 (2), 653.
Fisher, M. E., & Berker, A. N. (1982). Scaling for first-order phase transitions in thermodynamic and finite systems. Physical Review B, 26 (5), 2507.
Fletcher, S. C. (2019). On the reduction of general relativity to newtonian gravitation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 68, 1–15.
Franklin, A. (2018). On the renormalization group explanation of universality. Philosophy of Science, 85 (2), 225–248.
Franklin, A. (2019). Universality reduced. Philosophy of Science, 86 (5), 1295–1306.
Fraser, J. D. (2016). Spontaneous symmetry breaking in finite systems. Philosophy of Science, 83 (4), 585–605.
Fraser, J. D. (2020). Towards a realist view of quantum field theory. In French, S. & Saatsi, J. (Eds.) Scientific realism and the quantum (p. 276) Oxford University Press.
Georgi, H. (1991). On-shell effective field theory. Nuclear Physics B, 361 (2), 339–350.
Georgi, H. (1993). Effective field theory. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 43 (1), 209–252.
Gillett, C. (2016). Reduction and emergence in science and philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Goldenfeld, N. (1992). Lectures on phase transitions and the renormalization group. CRC Press.
Goldstein, J. (1999). Emergence as a construct: History and issues. Emergence, 1 (1), 49–72.
Gross, D. H. (2001). Microcanonical thermodynamics: Phase transitions in “small” systems. World Scientific.
Gross, D. H., & Votyakov, E. (2000). Phase transitions in “small” systems. The European Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 15 (1), 115–126.
Gryb, S., Palacios, P., & Thébault, K. P. (2020). On the universality of hawking radiation. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 72 (3), 809–837.
Guay, A., & Sartenaer, O. (2016). A new look at emergence. or when after is different. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 6 (2), 297–322.
Hartmann, S. (2001). Effective field theories, reductionism and scientific explanation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 32 (2), 267–304.
Hendry, R. F. (2010). Emergence vs. reduction in chemistry. In Macdonald, C. & Macdonald, G. (Eds.) Emergence in mind (pp. 205–221). Oxford University Press.
Huggett, N., & Weingard, R. (1995). The renormalisation group and effective field theories. Synthese, 102 (1), 171–194.
Humphreys, P. (2008). Synchronic and diachronic emergence. Minds and Machines, 18 (4), 431–442.
Humphreys, P. (2016). Emergence: A philosophical account. Oxford University Press.
Kadanoff, L. P. (1966). Scaling laws for Ising models near Tc. Physics Physique Fizika, 2 (6), 263.
Kadanoff, L. P. (2009). More is the same; phase transitions and mean field theories. Journal of Statistical Physics, 137 (5), 777–797.
Kadanoff, L. P. (2010). Theories of matter: Infinities and renormalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1002.2985.
Kadanoff, L. P. (2013). Relating theories via renormalization. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 44 (1), 22–39.
Kadanoff, L. P., Houghton, A., & Yalabik, M. C. (1976). Variational approximations for renormalization group transformations. Journal of Statistical Physics, 14 (2), 171–203.
Kim, J. (1999). Making sense of emergence. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 95 (1/2), 3–36.
Knox, E. (2016). Abstraction and its limits: Finding space for novel explanation. Noûs, 50 (1), 41–60.
Landsman, N. P. (2013). Spontaneous symmetry breaking in quantum systems: Emergence or reduction? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 44 (4), 379–394.
Lavis, D. A., Kühn, R., & Frigg, R. (2021). Becoming large, becoming infinite: The anatomy of thermal physics and phase transitions in finite systems. Foundations of Physics, 51 (5), 1–69.
Lorcé, C. (2018). On the hadron mass decomposition. The European Physical Journal C, 78 (2), 1–11.
Luu, T., & Meißner, U.-G. (2019). On the topic of emergence from an effective field theory perspective. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.13770.
Manohar, A. V., & Wise, M. B. (2007). Heavy quark physics. Cambridge University Press.
Mayr, E. (1988). The limits of reductionism. Nature, 331 (6156), 475–475.
McComb, W. D. (2004). Renormalization methods: A guide for beginners. Oxford University Press.
McGivern, P. (2007). Comments on Andrew Wayne’s singular limits, explanation and emergence in physics. Pacific APA meeting.
Menon, T., & Callender, C. (2011). Turn and face the strange... ch-ch-changes: Philosophical Questions Raised by Phase Transitions. In Batterman, R. W. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of physics. (pp. 189–223) Oxford University Press.
Mill, J. S. (1872). A system of logic ratiocinative and inductive: 1 (Vol. 2). Longmans.
Morrison, M. (2012). Emergent physics and micro-ontology. Philosophy of Science, 79 (1), 141–166.
Nagel, E. (1949). The meaning of reduction in the natural sciences. In Stauffer, R. C. (Ed.), Science and civilization. (pp. 99–135) University of Wisconsin Press.
Nagel, E. (1961). The structure of science: Problems in the logic of explanation. Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.
Nagel, E. (1970). Issues in the logic of reductive explanations. In Kiefer, H. & Munitz, K. (Eds.), Mind, science and history (pp. 117–137). SUNY Press.
Nickles, T. (1973). Two concepts of intertheoretic reduction. The Journal of Philosophy, 70 (7), 181–201.
Nienhuis, B., Riedel, E., & Schick, M. (1980). Variational renormalisation-group approach to the q-state potts model in two dimensions. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 13 (2), L31.
Nishimori, H., & Ortiz, G. (2010). Elements of phase transitions and critical phenomena. Oxford University Press.
Norton, J. D. (2012). Approximation and idealization: Why the difference matters. Philosophy of Science, 79 (2), 207–232.
Norton, J. D. (2014). Infinite idealizations. In European philosophy of science. Philosophy of science in Europe and the viennese heritage: vienna Circle Institute yearbook (Vol. 17, pp. 197–210). Springer.
Novikov, V., Shifman, M. A., Vainshtein, A., & Zakharov, V. I. (1983). Exact gell-mannlow function of supersymmetric yang-mills theories from instanton calculus. Nuclear Physics B, 229 (2), 381–393.
Palacios, P. (2018). Had we but world enough, and time... but we don’t!: Justifying the thermodynamic and infinite-time limits in statistical mechanics. Foundations of Physics, 48 (5), 526–541.
Palacios, P. (2019). Phase transitions: A challenge for intertheoretic reduction? Philosophy of Science, 86 (4), 612–640.
Palacios, P., & Valente, G. (2021). The paradox of infinite limits: A realist response. In Lyons, T. D. & Vickers, P. (Eds.), Contemporary scientific realism: The challenge from the history of science (pp. 311–347). Oxford University Press.
Reutlinger, A. (2014). Why is there universal macrobehavior? Renormalization group explanation as noncausal explanation. Philosophy of Science, 81 (5), 1157–1170.
Rivat, S., & Grinbaum, A. (2020). Philosophical foundations of effective field theories. The European Physical Journal A, 56 (3), 1–10.
Robertson, K. (2020). In search of the holy grail: How to reduce the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
Rosaler, J. (2019). Reduction as an a posteriori relation. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 70 (1), 269–299.
Rueger, A. (2000). Robust supervenience and emergence. Philosophy of Science, 67 (3), 466–489.
Rueger, A. (2004). Reduction, autonomy, and causal exclusion among physical properties. Synthese, 139 (1), 1–21.
Schaffner, K. F. (1967). Approaches to reduction. Philosophy of Science, 34 (2), 137–147.
Schmelzer, J., & Ulbricht, H. (1987). Thermodynamics of finite systems and the kinetics of first-order phase transitions. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 117 (2), 325–338.
Schmelzer, J. W., Boltachev, G. S., & Abyzov, A. S. (2013). Temperature of critical clusters in nucleation theory: Generalized Gibbs’ approach. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 139 (3), 034702.
Shech, E. (2015). Two approaches to fractional statistics in the quantum hall effect: Idealizations and the curious case of the anyon. Foundations of Physics, 45 (9), 1063–1100.
Sklar, L. (1967). Types of inter-theoretic reduction. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 18 (2), 109–124.
Sklar, L. (1999). The reduction (?) of thermodynamics to statistical mechanics. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 95 (1/2), 187–202.
Smart, J. J. (1981). Physicalism and emergence. Neuroscience, 6 (2), 109–113.
Sullivan, E. (2019). Universality caused: The case of renormalization group explanation. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 9 (3), 1–21.
Uffink, J. (2001). Bluff your way in the second law of thermodynamics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 32 (3), 305–394.
Valente, G. (2020). Taking up statistical thermodynamics: Equilibrium fluctuations and irreversibility. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 85, 176–184.
Wallace, D. (2018). Spontaneous symmetry breaking in finite quantum systems: A decoherenthistories approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.09547.
Wayne, A. (2012). Emergence and singular limits. Synthese, 184 (3), 341–356.
Weisberg, M. (2007). Three kinds of idealization. The Journal of Philosophy, 104 (12), 639–659.
Weiss, P. (1907). L’hypothèse du champ moléculaire et la propriété ferromagnétique. Journal of Physics: Theories and Applications, 6 (1), 661–690.
Williams, P. (2019). Scientific realism made effective. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 70 (1), 209–237.
Wilson, K. G., & Kogut, J. (1974). The renormalization group and the expansion. Physics Reports, 12 (2), 75–199.
Worrall, J. (1989). Structural realism: The best of both worlds? Dialectica, 43 (1–2), 99–124.
Wu, J. (2021). Explaining universality: Infinite limit systems in the renormalization group method. Synthese, 199, 14897–14930.
