Skip to main content
×
Home
Eminent Domain
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    Eminent Domain
    • Online ISBN: 9781316822685
    • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316822685
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to? *
    ×
  • Buy the print book

Book description

The taking of private property for development projects has caused controversy in many nations, where it has often been used to benefit powerful interests at the expense of the general public. This edited collection is the first to use a common framework to analyze the law and economics of eminent domain around the world. The authors show that seemingly disparate nations face a common set of problems in seeking to regulate the condemnation of private property by the state. They include the tendency to forcibly displace the poor and politically weak for the benefit of those with greater influence, disputes over compensation, and resort to condemnation in cases where it destroys more economic value than it creates. With contributions from leading scholars in the fields of property law and economics, the book offers a comparative perspective and considers a wide range of possible solutions to these problems.

Reviews

'This volume is a superb analysis of eminent domain at a genuinely global level. It shows a close relationship between a nation’s level of economic development and the degree of protection for private property rights against takings. The organization is systematic in that the authors faithfully follow a unified analytic framework to overcome the difficulty of making meaningful inter-jurisdictional comparisons. As a judge who has experienced different stages of development in my own country, I am certain that professional and lay readers alike can benefit from this wide-ranging and learned book.'

Soon-il Kwon - Honorable Justice, Supreme Court of Korea

'In Eminent Domain: A Comparative Perspective, Ilya Somin, Hojun Lee, and Iljoong Kim have assembled a panoramic view of the law of eminent domain across nations as diverse as Germany, the United States, South Korea, and Taiwan. Providing an exceptionally complete yet concise summary of each regime, this volume also provides an extraordinarily useful framework for understanding how and why each system succeeds or fails in safeguarding fundamental rights to retain what one owns in the face of eminent domain. It is an essential volume for anyone studying or defending the right to private property.'

Roderick M. Hills - William T. Comfort, III Professor of Law, New York University

‘The use of the eminent domain power is common throughout democracies in both the developed and developing world. The exercise of that power, so necessary for sustainable growth, is also fraught with great peril. This timely and instructive volume fills a major gap in the literature by examining the ups and downs of eminent domain in a comparative context, with special emphasis on the law of South Korea, which has been the home to some of the most important takings conflicts in recent years.’

Richard Epstein - Laurence A. Tisch Professor of Law, New York University

    • Aa
    • Aa
Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send:
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.


Ilya Somin , The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. City of New London and the Limits of Eminent Domain (University of Chicago Press, 2015)

Thomas Miceli , The Economic Theory of Eminent Domain; Private Property, Public Use (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

T. Ginsburg , “Confucian constitutionalism? The emergence of constitutional review in Korea and Taiwan,” Law and Social Inquiry, 27(4) (2002), 763690

A. van Aaken , “Primary and secondary remedies in international investment law and national state liability: a functional and comparative view,” in S. W. Schill (ed.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (Oxford University Press, 2010), p. 721

Yun-chien Chang , Private Property and Takings Compensation: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Analysis (Edward Elgar, 2013)

P. Niemann and P. Shapiro , “Efficiency and fairness, compensation for takings,” International Review of Law and Economics, 28 (2008), 157–65

G. Calabresi , “Toward a unified theory of torts,” Journal of Tort Law, 1(3) (2007), 111

D. S. Cohen , “Regulating regulators: the legal environment of the state,” University of Toronto Law Journal, 40 (1990), 213–70

J. Cho and I. Kim , “An economic analysis of takings in Korea: endogenous probability and announcement effects,” International Review of Law and Economics, 22(3) (2002) 331–46

H.-B. Schäfer and Claus Ott , Lehrbuch der ökonomischen Analyse des Zivilrechts, 5th edn (Springer, 2012)

I. Somin ; The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. City of New London and the Limits of Eminent Domain (University of Chicago Press, 2015)

L. Blum and D. Rubinfeld , “Compensation for takings: an economic analysis”, California Law Review, 72(4) (1984), 569628

Ilya Somin , The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. City of New London and the Limits of Eminent Domain (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015)

Jed Rubenfeld , “Usings,” 102 (1993) Yale Law Journal 1077, 1078–80

Kurt T. Lash , The Fourteenth Amendment and the Privileges and Immunities of American Citizenship (Cambridge University Press, 2014)

James W. Ely Jr., “The Progressive Era Assault on Individualism and Property Rights,” 29 (2012) Social Philosophy and Policy 255

[anonymous], “The public use limitation on eminent domain: an advance requiem,” 58 (1949) Yale Law Journal 599

Janice Nadler and Shari Seidman Diamond , “Government takings of private property,” in Nathaniel Persily , Jack Citrin , and Patrick Egan (eds.), Public Opinion and Constitutional Controversy (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008)

Edward J. López , Todd Jewell , and Noel Campbell ., “Pass a law, any law: state legislative responses to the Kelo backlash,” 5 (2009) Review of Law and Economics 101

Andrew Morriss , “Symbol or substance? An empirical assessment of state responses to Kelo,” 17 (2009) Supreme Court Economic Review 237

James W. Ely Jr., “Post-Kelo reform: is the glass half-full or half-empty?,” 17 (2009) Supreme Court Economic Review 127

Elaine B. Sharp and Donald Haider-Markel , “At the invitation of the court: eminent domain reform in state legislatures in the wake of the Kelo decision,” 38 (2008) Publius: Journal of Federalism 556

Yun-chien Chang , Private Property and Takings Compensation: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Analysis (Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2013), 167–72

Margaret Jane Radin , “The liberal conception of property: cross currents in the jurisprudence of takings,” 88 (1988) Columbia Law Review 1667, 1689–96

Gideon Parchomovsky and Peter Siegelman , “Selling Mayberry: communities and individuals in law and economics,” 92 (2004) California Law Review 75, 139–42

Richard A. Epstein , “Property, speech and the politics of distrust,” 59 (1992) University of Chicago Law Review 41, 62 n. 60, 6263

Lawrence Blume , Daniel Rubinfeld , and Perry Shapiro , “The taking of land: when should compensation be paid?99 (1984) Quarterly Journal of Economics 71

Thomas J. Miceli , The Economic Theory of Eminent Domain: Private Property, Public Use (Cambridge University Press, 2011), 85112

Patricia Munch , “An economic analysis of eminent domain,” 84 (1976) Journal of Political Economy 473

Giacomo Di Frederico , “Fundamental rights in the EU: legal pluralism and multi-level protection after the Lisbon Treaty,” in Giacomo Di Frederico (ed.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. from Declaration to Binding Instrument (Dordrecht et al.: Springer 2011), p. 15

Rudolf Dolzer and Christoph Schreuer , Principles of International Investment Law, 2nd edn. (Oxford University Press, 2012)

Peter Muchlinski , Federico Ortino and Christoph Schreuer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford University Press, 2008)

August Reinisch , ‘Putting the pieces together … an EU model bit?,’ 15 (2014) Journal of World Investment and Trade 679

Anne van Aaken , “Primary and secondary remedies in international investment law and national state liability: a functional and comparative view,” in Stephan Schill (ed.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (Oxford University Press, 2010), p. 721

Kathrin Kuhnert , “Bosphorus – Double standards in European human rights protection?,” 2 (2006) Utrecht Law Review 177

Louis Kaplow , “An economic analysis of legal transition,” 99 (1986) Harvard Law Review 509

James M. Buchanan and Yong J. Yoon , “Symmetric tragedies: commons and anticommons,” 43 (2000) Journal of Law and Economics 1

Yun-chien Chang . 2009. Empire Building and Fiscal Illusion? An Empirical Study of Government Official Behaviors in Takings. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 6: 541–84.

Yun-chien Chang . 2012. Self-Assessment of Takings Compensation: An Empirical Study. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 28: 265–85.

Yun-chien Chang . 2013. Private Property and Takings Compensation: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Analysis. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

H. Cai , J. V. Henderson and Q. Zhang . 2013. “China’s Land Market Auctions: Evidence of Corruption?RAND Journal of Economics, 44(3), 488521.

D. M. Carpenter , and J. K. Ross . 2010. “Do Restrictions on Eminent Domain Harm Economic Development?Economic Development Quarterly, 24(4), 337–51.

J. Du and R. B. Peiser . 2014. “Land Supply, Pricing and Local Governments’ Land Hoarding in China.” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 48, 180–89.

C. B. Kerekes and C. R. Williamson . 2010. “Propertyless in Peru, Even with a Government Land Title.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 69(3), 1011–33.

C. Kitchens 2014. “The Use of Eminent Domain in Land Assembly: The Case of the Tennessee Valley Authority.” Public Choice, 160(3–4), 455–66.

S. P. Lanza , T. J. Miceli , C. F. Sirmans and M. Diop . 2013. “The Use of Eminent Domain for Economic Development in the Era of Kelo.” Economic Development Quarterly, 27(4), 352–62.

W. O. Larbi , Adarkwah Antwi and Paul Olomolaiye . 2004. “Compulsory Land Acquisition in Ghana – Policy and Praxis.” Land Use Policy, 21(2), 115–27.

E. J. Lopez and J. R. Clark . 2013. “The Problem with the Holdout Problem.” Review of Law and Economics, 9(2), 151–67.

T. J. Miceli and K. Segerson . 2012. “Land Assembly and the Holdout Problem under Sequential Bargaining.” American Law and Economics Review, 14(2), 372–90.

E. Nosal 2001. “The Taking of Land: Market Value Compensation Should Be Paid.” Journal of Public Economics, 82(3), 431–43.

S. Shavell 2010. “Eminent Domain Versus Government Purchase of Land Given Imperfect Information About Owners’ Valuations.” Journal of Law and Economics, 53(1), 127.

G. K. Turnbull 2012. “Delegating Eminent Domain Powers to Private Firms: Land Use and Efficiency Implications.” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 45(2), 305–25.

G. K. Turnbull and R. F. Salvino . 2009. “Do Broader Eminent Domain Powers Increase Government Size?Review of Law and Economics, 5(1), 785806.

H. Zheng , X. Wang and S. Cao . 2014. “The Land Finance Model Jeopardizes China’s Sustainable Development.” Habitat International, 44(0), 130–36.

Dean Lueck , and Thomas J. Miceli , 2007, “Property Law,” Chapter 3, Handbook of Law and Economics, Vol. 1, (edited by Mitchell Polinsky and Steven Shavell ), Elsevier.

Bruce Benson and Matthew Brown , 2010, “Eminent Domain for Private Use: Is It Justified Market Failure or an Example of Government Failure,” Bruce Benson (ed.), Property Rights: Eminent Domain and Regulatory Takings Re-Examined, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 149–72.

Boudewijn Bouckaert and Gerrit De Geest , 1995, “Private Takings, Private Taxes, Private Compulsory Services: The Economic Doctrine of Quasi Contracts,” International Review of Law and Economics, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 463–87.

Paul Burrows , 1991, “Compensation for Compulsory Acquisition,” Land Economics, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 4963.

Joonmo Cho and Iljoong Kim , 2002, “An Economic Analysis of Takings in Korea: Endogenous Probability and Announcement Effects,” International Review of Law and Economics, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 331–46.

Matthew Cypher and Fred Forgey , 2003, “Eminent Domain: An Evaluation Based on Criteria Relating to Equity, Effectiveness, and Efficiency,” Urban Affairs Review, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 254–68.

Steven Eagle , 2010, “Assembling Land for Urban Redevelopment: The Case for Owner Participation,” Bruce Benson (ed.), Property Rights: Eminent Domain and Regulatory Takings Re-Examined, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 729.

Robert Ellickson , 1973, “Alternative to Zoning: Covenants, Nuisance Rules, and Fines as Land Use Controls,” University of Chicago Law Review, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 681714.

Eduardo Engel , Ronald Fischer , and Alexander Galetovic , 2005, “Highway Franchising and Real Estate Values,” Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 432–48.

Daniel Kelly , 2009, “Pretextual Takings: of Private Developers, Local Governments, and Impermissible Favoritism,” Supreme Court Economic Review, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 173236.

Daniel Kelly , 2011, “Acquiring Land through Eminent Domain: Justifications, Limitations, and Alternatives,” Kenneth Ayotte and Henry Smith (eds.), Research Handbook on the Economic Analysis of Property Law, Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar, pp. 344–71.

Carrie Kerekes , 2011, “Government Takings: Determinants of Eminent Domain,” American Law and Economics Review, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 201–19.

Iljoong Kim and Sungkyu Park , 2010, “Eminent Domain Power and Afterwards: Leviathan’s Post-Taking Opportunism,” Public Choice, vol. 143, no. 1–2, pp. 209–27.

Steven Lanza , C. F. Thomas Miceli Sirmans , and Moussa Diop , 2013, “The Use of Eminent Domain for Economic Development in the Era of Kelo,” Economic Development Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 352–62.

Thomas Miceli , 2011, The Economic Theory of Eminent Domain: Private Property, Public Use, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Harry Scheiber , 1973, “Property Law, Expropriation, and Resource Allocation by Government: The United States, 1789–1910,” Journal of Economic History, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 232–51.

Steven Shavell , 2010, “Eminent Domain versus Government Purchase of Land Given Imperfect Information about Owners,” Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 127.

Ilya Somin , 2007, “Controlling the Grasping Hand: Economic Development Takings after Kelo,” Supreme Court Economic Review, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 183271.

Ilya Somin , 2015, The Grasping Hand: ‘Kelo v. City of London’ and the Limits of Eminent Domain, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Samuel Staley , 2010, “The Proper Uses of Eminent Domain for Urban Redevelopment is Eminent Domain Necessary? Bruce Benson (ed.), Property Rights: Eminent Domain and Regulatory Takings Re-Examined, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 2754.

207 Geoffrey Turnbull , 2012, “Delegating Eminent Domain Powers to Private Firms: Land Use and Efficiency Implications,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 305–25.

Paul Burrows , 1991, “Compensation of Compulsory Acquisition,” Land Economics, vol. 67(1), pp. 4963.

G. Alfredo Esposto , 1996, “The Political Economy of Taking and Just Compensation,” Public Choice, vol. 89(3–4), pp. 267–82.

J. Thomas Miceli , The Economic Theory of Eminent Domain: Private Property, Public Use (Cambridge University Press, 2011).

I. Frank Michelman , 1967, “Property, Utility, and Fairness: Comments on the Ethical Foundations of Just Compensation Law,” Harvard Law Review, vol. 80, pp. 11651258.

Patricia Munch , 1976, “An Economic Analysis of Eminent Domain,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 84, pp. 473–97.

Nosal Ed., 2001, “The Takings of Land: Market Value Compensation Should Be Paid,” Journal of Public Economics, vol. 82, pp. 431–43.

Bruce Benson and Matthew Brown , 2010, “Eminent Domain for Private Use: Is It Justified by Market Failure or an Example of Government Failure,” in Bruce Benson (ed.), Property Rights: Eminent Domain and Regulatory Takings Re-Examined, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Yun-Chen Chang , 2013, Private Property and Takings Compensation: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Analysis, Northampton MA: Edward Elgar.

A. Richard Epstein , 2011, Design for Liberty: Private Property, Public Administration, and the Rule of Law, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Iljoong Kim and Sungkyu Park , 2010, “Eminent Domain Power and Afterwards: Leviathan’s Post-Taking Opportunism,” Public Choice, vol. 143, pp. 209–27.

J. Thomas Miceli , 2011, The Economics Theory of Eminent Domain: Private Property, Public Use, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ed Nosal , 2001, “The Taking of Land: Market Value Compensation Should Be Paid,” Journal of Public Economy, vol. 82, pp. 431–43.

Steven Shavell , 2010, “Eminent Domain versus Government Purchase of Land Given Imperfect Information about Owners,” Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 53, pp. 127.

Ilya Somin , 2007, “Controlling the Grasping Hand: Economic Development Takings after Kelo,” Supreme Court Economic Review, vol. 15, pp. 183271.

Paul Thorsnes and P. McMillen Daniel , 1998, “Land Value and Parcel Size: A Semi-parametric Analysis,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 233–44.

Ilya Somin , The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. City of New London and the Limits of Eminent Domain (University of Chicago Press, 2015), ch. 3

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 223 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 773 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th April 2017 - 20th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.