References
Alkon, P. (1979). Defoe and Fictional Time, Athens: University of Georgia Press.
Arbuthnot, J. (1701). An Essay on the Usefulness of Mathematical Learning, Oxford: Printed at the Theatre in Oxford for Anth. Priestley.
Auyoung, E. (2020). What We Mean by Reading. New Literary History 51(1), 93–114.
Bacon, F. (1620). The Philosophical Works of Frances Bacon, Repr 1905, London: Routledge.
Bannet, E. T. (2007). Quixotes, Imitations, and Transatlantic Genres. Eighteenth-Century Studies 40(4), 553–569.
Batten, W. (1630). A Most Plaine and Easie Way for Finding the Sunne’s Amplitude and Azimuth, London.
Bender, J. (1998). Enlightenment Fiction and the Scientific Hypothesis. Representations 61(Winter), 6–28.
Bender, J. (2010). Novel Knowledge: Judgment, Experience, Experiment, in Siskin, C. and Warner, W. (eds.) This Is Enlightenment, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 284–300.
Bender, J. (2012). Ends of Enlightenment, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Berkeley, G. (1710). Principles of Human Knowledge and Three Dialogues, Repr 2009, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bowker, G. and Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Boxall, P. (2015). The Value of the Novel, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burney, F. (1778). Evelina, Repr 2008, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Burney, F. (1814). The Wanderer, Repr 2001, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Campbell, G. (1990). How to Read Like a Gentleman: Burney’s Instructions to Her Critics in Evelina. English Literary History 57(3), 557–583.
Campbell, M. B. (1999). Wonder and Science: Imagining Worlds in Early Modern Europe, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Cheyne, G. (1701). A New Theory of Continu’d Fevers, Edinburgh.
Chico, T. (2018). The Experimental Imagination: Literary Knowledge and Science in the British Enlightenment, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Crump, J. (2002). A Known Scribbler: Frances Burney on Literary Life, Peterborough: Broadview.
Dale, A. (2019). The Printed Reader: Gender, Quixotism, and Textual Bodies in Eighteenth-Century Britain, Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press.
Daston, L. and Galison, P. (2007). Objectivity, New York: Zone Books.
Defoe, D. (1719). Robinson Crusoe, Repr 2007, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DeGabriele, P. (2014). The Legal Fiction and Epistolary Form: Frances Burney’s Evelina. Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies 14(2), 22–40.
Deringer, W. (2018). Calculated Values: Finance, Politics, and the Quantitative Age, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dicker, G. (2019). Locke on Knowledge and Reality: A Commentary on an Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Donnelly, B. (2019). “Chequer Works of Providence”: Skeptical Providentialism in Daniel Defoe’s Fiction. Philosophy and Literature 43, 107–120.
Doody, M. A. (1997). The Short Fiction, in Copeland, E. and McMaster, J. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Jane Austen, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 84–99.
Fielding, H. (1741). Shamela, Repr 2008, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fielding, H. (1742). Joseph Andrews, Repr 2008, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fielding, H. (1749). Tom Jones, Repr 1998, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fielding, H. (1752). Review of Charlotte Lennox’s The Female Quixote. The Covent Garden Journal 242, Repr 2011.
Gallagher, C. (2006). The Rise of Fictionality, in Moretti, F. (ed.) The Novel, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 336–363.
Gordon, S. P. (2006). The Practice of Quixotism: Postmodern Theory and Eighteenth-Century Women’s Writing, New York: Palgrave.
Grayling, A. C. (2019). The History of Philosophy, New York: Penguin.
Hacking, I. (1975). The Emergence of Probability: A Philosophical Study of Early Ideas about Probability, Induction, and Statistical Inference, Repr 2006, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hanlon, A. R. (2019). A World of Disorderly Notions: Quixote and the Logic of Exceptionalism, Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
Hanlon, A. R. (forthcoming a). From Writing Lives to Scaling Lives in Joseph Priestley’s Chart of Biography. The Eighteenth Century: Theory and Interpretation 62(3–4).
Hanlon, A. R. (forthcoming b). Information and Credibility in Journal of the Plague Year. Digital Defoe.
Hanlon, A. R. (forthcoming c). Sense and Sensibility as Social-Epistemic System. Studies in the Novel 55(2).
Hastings, W. (1912). Errors and Inconsistencies in Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe. English Language Notes 27(6), pp. 161–166.
Hershinow, S. (2019). Born Yesterday: Inexperience and the Early Realist Novel, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hooke, R. (1665a). Micrographia, London: printed by Jo. Martyn and Ja. Allestry, printers to the Royal Society.
Hume, D. (1739). A Treatise of Human Nature, Repr 2000, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hume, D. (1748). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Repr 2008, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hume, D. (1757). Of the Standard of Taste, and Other Essays, Repr 1965, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Keiser, J. (2020). Nervous Fictions: Literary Form and the Enlightenment Origins of Neuroscience, Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
Kirkley, H. (2002). A Biographer at Work: Samuel Johnson’s Notes for the “Life of Pope”, Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press.
Kramnick, J. (2007). Empiricism, Cognitive Science, and the Novel. The Eighteenth Century: Theory and Interpretation 48(3), 263–285.
Kramnick, J. (2010). Actions and Objects from Hobbes to Richardson, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Kukkonen, K. (2019). 4E Cognition and Eighteenth-Century Fiction: How the Novel Found its Feet, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lake, C. (2020). Artifacts: How We Think and Write about Found Objects, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought, New York: Basic Books.
Lamb, J. (2007). Locke’s Wild Fancies: Empiricism, Personhood, and Fictionality. The Eighteenth Century: Theory and Interpretation 48(3), 187–204.
Lennox, C. (1752). The Female Quixote, Repr 2008, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Loar, C. (2019). Plague’s Ecologies: Daniel Defoe and the Epidemic Constitution. Eighteenth-Century Fiction 32(1), 31–53.
Longino, H. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lupton, C. (2012). Knowing Books: The Consciousness of Mediation in Eighteenth-Century Britain, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
MacDonnell, K. (2020). Beneath Defoe’s Island: Imperial Geopolitics and the Inorganic Economy in Robinson Crusoe. Philological Quarterly 99(1), 1–24.
Maioli, R. (2016). Empiricism and the Early Theory of the Novel, London: Palgrave.
McKeon, M. (2000). Theory of the Novel: A Historical Approach, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Molesworth, J. (2010). Chance and the Eighteenth-Century Novel: Realism, Probability, Magic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Motooka, W. (1998). The Age of Reasons: Quixotism, Sentimentalism, and Political Economy in Eighteenth-Century Britain, London: Routledge.
Okasha, S. (2001). What Did Hume Really Show about Induction? The Philosophical Quarterly 51(204), 307–327.
Oreskes, N. (2019). Why Trust Science? Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Paulson, R. (1998). Don Quixote in England: The Aesthetics of Laughter, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Petty, W. (1690). Political Arithmetick, London: Printed for Robert Clavel at the Peacock, and Hen. Mortlock at the Phoenix in St. Paul’s Church-yard.
Picciotto, J. (2010). Labors of Innocence in Early Modern England, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Pino, M. (2010). Burney’s Evelina and Aesthetics in Action. Modern Philology 108(2), 263–303.
Poovey, M. (1998). A History of the Modern Fact: Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Porter, T. (1995). Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Porter, D. (2018). Science, Form, and the Problem of Induction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Preston, C. (2016). The Poetics of Scientific Investigation in Seventeenth-Century England, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Priest, S. (2007). The British Empiricists, London: Routledge.
Principe, L. M. (1995). Virtuous Romance and Romantic Virtuoso: The Shaping of Robert Boyle’s Literary Style. Journal of the History of Ideas 56(3), 377–397.
Rickless, S. (2008). Is Locke’s Theory of Knowledge Inconsistent? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77(1), 83–104.
Rosenberg, D. (2013). Data before the Fact, in Gitelman, L. (ed.) Raw Data is an Oxymoron, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 15–40.
Schmidgen, W. (2001). Robinson Crusoe, Enumeration, and the Mercantile Fetish. Eighteenth-Century Studies 35(1), 19–39.
Schmidgen, W. (2016). The Metaphysics of Robinson Crusoe. English Literary History 83(1), 101–126.
Shapin, S. (1995). Cordelia’s Love: Credibility and the Social Study of Science. Perspectives on Science 3(3), 255–275.
Shapin, S. and Schaffer, S. (2011). Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life, revised ed., Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Siskin, C. (2001). Novels and Systems. NOVEL: A Forum on Fiction 34(2), 202–215.
Smith, C. W. (2016). Empiricist Devotions: Science, Religion, and Poetry in Early Eighteenth-Century England, Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
Spacks, P. M. (1974). Ev’ry Woman is at Heart a Rake. Eighteenth-Century Studies 8(1), 27–46.
Spacks, P. M. (1988). The Subtle Sophistry of Desire: Dr. Johnson and The Female Quixote. Modern Philology 85, 532–542.
Spacks, P. M. (1990). Desire and Truth: Functions of Plot in Eighteenth-Century English Novels, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Straub, K. (1989). Reconstructing the Gaze: Voyeurism in Richardson’s Pamela. Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture 18, 419–431.
Swenson, R. (2010). Optics, Gender, and the Eighteenth-Century Gaze: Looking at Eliza Haywood’s Anti-Pamela. The Eighteenth Century: Theory and Interpretation 51(1–2), 27–43.
Thompson, H. (2016). Fictional Matter: Empiricism, Corpuscles, and the Novel, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Thompson, H. and Meeker, N. (2007). Empiricism, Substance, Narrative: An Introduction. The Eighteenth Century: Theory and Interpretation 48(3), 183–186.
Vickers, B. (2002). “Words” and “Things” – or, “Words, Concepts, and Things”? Rhetorical and Linguistic Categories in the Renaissance, in Kessler, E. and Maclean, I. (eds.) Res et Verba in der Renaissance, Weissbaden: Harassowitz Verglag, pp. 287–335.
Warner, W. (1998). Licensing Entertainment: The Elevation of Novel Reading in Britain, 1684–1750, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Watt, I. (1957). The Rise of the Novel, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Watt, I. (2001). The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson, and Fielding, 2nd ed., Berkeley: University of California Press.
Williams, B. (2002). Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Williams, B. (2008). Shame and Necessity, 2nd ed., Berkeley: University of California Press.
Wong, B. (2016). Pamela, Part II: Richardson’s Trial by Theatre. Eighteenth-Century Fiction 29(2), 179–199.
Wood, J. (2020). Robinson Crusoe and the Earthly Ground. Eighteenth-Century Fiction 32(3), 381–406.
Wood, S. (2005). Quixotic Fictions of the USA, 1792–1815, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wragge-Morley, A. (2020). Aesthetic Science: Representing Nature in the Royal Society of London, 1650–1720, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
