References
Ahmed, A. 2014a. Evidence, Decision and Causality. Cambridge University Press.
Ahmed, A. 2014b. Dicing with death. Analysis 74 (4): 587–92.
Ahmed, A. 2018. Self-control and hyperbolic discounting. In Bermúdez, J.-L. (ed.), Self-Control, Decision Theory and Rationality. Cambridge University Press: 96–120.
Ahmed, A. 2020. Equal opportunities in Newcomb’s Problem and elsewhere. Mind 129 (515): 867–86.
Ahmed, A. and Price, H.. 2012. Arntzenius on ‘Why ain’cha rich?’ Erkenntnis 77 (1): 15–30.
Ahmed, A. and Price, H. and Spencer, J.. 2020. Objective value is always Newcombizable. Mind 129 (516): 1157–92.
Ainslie, G. 1991. Derivation of ‘rational’ economic behaviour from hyperbolic discount curves. American Economic Review 81 (2): 334–40.
Allais, M. 1953. Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axiomes de l’école Américaine. Econometrica 21 (4): 503–46.
Bales, A. (unpublished). Decision and Dependence: A Defence of Causal Decision Theory. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge.
Bales, A. 2018. Richness and rationality: Causal Decision Theory and the WAR argument. Synthese 195 (1): 259–67.
Bénabou, R. and Tirole., J. 2011. Identity, morals and taboos: beliefs as assets. Quarterly Journal of Economics 126 (2): 805–55.
Bermúdez, J. L. 2018. Does Newcomb’s Problem actually exist? In Ahmed, A. (ed.), Newcomb’s Problem. Cambridge University Press: 19–41.
Bernoulli, D. 1738. Specimen Theoriae Novae de Mensura Sortis. Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae V: 175–92. Reprinted as ‘Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk’, tr. L. Sommer. Econometrica 22 (1) (1954): 23–36.
Bodner, R. and Prelec, D.. 2003. Self-signalling and diagnostic utility in everyday decision making. In Brocas, I. and Carrillo, J. D. (eds), The Psychology of Economic Decisions, vol. I: Rationality and Well-Being. Oxford University Press: 105–23.
Bolker, E. 1966. Functions resembling quotients of measures. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 124 (2): 292–312.
Bolker, E. 1967. A simultaneous axiomatization of utility and subjective probability. Philosophy of Science 34 (4): 333–40.
Bradley, R. 2017. Decision Theory with a Human Face. Cambridge University Press.
Bradley, R. and Stefánsson, H. O. 2016. Desire, expectation, and invariance. Mind 125 (499): 691–725.
Brier, G. W. 1950. Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probabilities. Monthly Weather Review 78 (1): 1–3.
Broome, J. 1991. Weighing Goods. Oxford: Blackwell.
Buchak, L. 2013. Risk and Rationality. Oxford University Press.
Capinski, M. and Copp, E.. 2004. Measure, Integral and Probability. 2nd ed. London: Springer.
Christensen, D. 1992. Confirmational holism and Bayesian epistemology. Philosophy of Science 59 (4): 540–57.
Chu, F. and Halpern, J. Y.. 2004. Great expectations. Part II: generalized expected utility as a universal decision rule. Artificial Intelligence 159 (1–2): 207–29.
De Finetti, B. 1937. La prévision: ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré 7: 1–68.
Diamond, P. 1967. Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics and interpersonal comparison of utility: comment. Journal of Political Economy 75 (5): 765–6.
Dove, M. R. 1993. Uncertainty, humility and adaptation in the tropical forest: the agricultural augury of the Kantu’. Ethnology 32 (2): 145–67.
Dummett, M. A. E. 1964. Bringing about the past. Philosophical Review 73 (3): 338–59.
Eells, E. 1982. Rational Decision and Causality. Cambridge University Press.
Elga, A. 2020. Newcomb University: A play in one act. Analysis 80 (2): 212–21.
Ellsberg, D. 1961. Risk, ambiguity and the Savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics 75 (4): 643–69.
Fernandes, A. 2017. A deliberative approach to causation. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 95 (3): 686–708.
Fisher, R. A. 1935. The Design of Experiments. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.
Flew, A. G. N. 1954. Can an effect precede its cause? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 28: 47–62.
Gallow, D. 2021. Riches and rationality. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 99 (1): 114-129.
Garber, D. 1983. Old evidence and logical omniscience in Bayesian confirmation theory. In Earman, J. (ed.), Testing Scientific Theories (Midwest Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. X). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 99–131.
Gibbard, A. and Harper., W. L. 1978. Counterfactuals and two kinds of expected utility. In Hooker, C., Leach, J., and McClennen, E. (eds), Foundations and Applications of Decision Theory. Dordrecht: Riedel: 125–62. Reprinted in P. Gärdenfors and N.-E. Sahlin (eds), Decision, Probability and Utility. Cambridge University Press 1988: 341–76.
Gneiting, T. and Raftery., A. E. 2007. Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction, and estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 102 (477): 359–78.
Grafstein, R. 1991. An evidential decision theory of turnout. American Journal of Political Science 35 (4): 989–1010.
Grafstein, R. 1999. Choice-Free Rationality: A Positive Theory of Political Behaviour. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Grafstein, R. 2018. Newcomb’s problem is everyone’s problem: making political and economic decisions when behaviour is interdependent. In Ahmed, A. (ed.), Newcomb’s Problem. Cambridge University Press: 96–114.
Greene, P. 2018. Success-first decision theories. In Ahmed, A. (ed.), Newcomb’s Problem. Cambridge University Press: 115–37.
Holton, R. J. 2016. Addiction, self-signalling and the deep self. Mind and Language 31 (3): 300–13.
Holton, R. J. Unpublished. Self-deception and the moral self.
Hume, D. 1738 [1949]. Treatise of Human Nature. London: J. M. Dent.
Huttegger, S. M. 2017. The Probabilistic Foundations of Rational Learning. Cambridge University Press.
Icard, T. 2021. Why be random? Mind 130 (517): 111-39
Irwin, T. 1985. (Tr.) Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Jeffrey, R. C. 1977. A note on the kinematics of preference. Erkenntnis 11 (1): 135–41.
Jeffrey, R. C. 1983. The Logic of Decision. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Joyce, J. M. 1999. Foundations of Causal Decision Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Joyce, J. M. 2011. The development of subjective Bayesianism. In Gabbay, D. M., Hartmann, S., and Woods, J. (eds), Handbook of the History of Logic, vol. 10. Oxford: Elsevier, 415–75.
Joyce, J. M. 2012. Regret and instability in Causal Decision Theory. Synthese 187 (1): 123–45.
Joyce, J. M. 2018. Deliberation and stability in Newcomb problems and pseudo-Newcomb problems. In Ahmed, A. (ed.), Newcomb’s Problem. Cambridge University Press: 138–59.
Kadane, J. and Seidenfeld, T.. 1990. Randomization in a Bayesian perspective. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 25 (3): 329–45.
Kahnemann, D. and Tversky., A. 1984. Choices, values and frames. APA award address. American Psychologist 39 (4): 341–50.
Kreps, D. 1988. Notes on the Theory of Choice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Levinstein, B. and Soares, N.. 2020. Cheating Death in Damascus. Journal of Philosophy 117 (5): 237–66.
Lewis, C. S. 1943. The Screwtape Letters. New York: MacMillan.
Lewis, D. K. 1976. The paradoxes of time travel. American Philosophical Quarterly 13 (2): 145–52. Reprinted in his Philosophical Papers, vol. 2. Oxford University Press 1986: 67–80.
Lewis, D. K. 1979. Prisoners’ dilemma is a Newcomb problem. Philosophy and Public Affairs 8 (3): 235–4.
Lewis, D. K. 1981a. Causal Decision Theory. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59 (1): 5–30. Reprinted with a postscript in his Philosophical Papers vol. 2. Oxford University Press 1986: 305–39.
Lewis, D. K. 1981b. Why ain’cha rich? Noûs 15 (3): 377–80.
Lewis, D. K. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford University Press.
Lewis, D. K. 1988. Desire as belief. Mind 97 (387): 323–32.
Lewis, D. K. 1996. Desire as belief II. Mind 105 (418): 303–13.
Lindley, D. V. 1956. On a measure of the information provided by an experiment. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 27 (4): 986–1005.
List, C. 2014. Free will, determinism, and the possibility of doing otherwise. Noûs 48 (1): 156–78.
Loewer, B. 2007. Counterfactuals and the second law. In Corry, R. and Price, H. (eds), Causation, Physics, and the Constitution of Reality. Oxford University Press: 293–326.
Luce, R. D. and Suppes, P.. 2004. Representational measurement theory. In Wixted, J. and Pashler, H. (eds), Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology, vol. 4. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley, 1–41.
Meek, C. and Glymour., C. 1994. Conditioning and intervening. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (4): 1000–21.
Milne, P. and Oddie., G. 1991. Act and value: expectation and the representation of moral theories. Theoria 57 (1–2): 42–76.
Moore, O. K. 1957. Divination – a new perspective. American Anthropologist 59 (1): 69–74.
Moscati, I. 2019. Measuring Utility: From the Marginal Revolution to Behavioural Economics. Oxford University Press.
Nozick, R. 1970. Newcomb’s problem and two principles of choice. In Rescher, N. (ed.), Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 114–46. Reprinted in P. Moser (ed.), Rationality in Action: Contemporary Approaches. Cambridge University Press 1990: 207–34.
Pasnau, R. 2020. Medieval modal spaces. In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 94: 225–54.
Pearl, J. 2000. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge University Press.
Pearl, J. Forthcoming. Causal and counterfactual inference. In Knauff, M. and Spohn, W. (eds), Handbook of Rationality. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
Peterson, M. 2017. An Introduction to Decision Theory. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.
Pettigrew, R. 2019. Choosing for Changing Selves. Oxford University Press.
Poundstone, W. 2014. How to Predict the Unpredictable: The Art of Outsmarting Almost Everyone. London: Oneworld.
Price, H. 1989. Defending desire-as-belief. Mind 98 (389): 119–27.
Price, H. 1991. Agency and probabilistic causality. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (2): 157–76.
Price, H. and Liu., Y. 2018. ‘Click!’ bait for causalists. In Ahmed, A. (ed.), Newcomb’s Problem. Cambridge University Press: 160–79.
Quattrone, G. A. and Tversky, A.. 1986. Self-deception and the voter’s illusion. In Elster, J. (ed.), The Multiple Self. Cambridge University Press: 35–58.
Quine, W. V. O. 1981. Things and their place in theories. In his Theories and Things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press: 1–23.
Ramsey, F. P. 1926. Truth and probability. In his Philosophical Papers, ed. Mellor, D. H.. Cambridge University Press 1990: 52–94.
Rothfus, G. J. 2020. Dynamic consistency in the logic of decision. Philosophical Studies 177: 3923–34.
Roulston, M. S. 2007. Performance targets and the Brier score. Meteorological Applications 14 (2): 185–94.
Savage, L. J. 1972. The Foundations of Statistics. 2nd ed. New York: Dover.
Seaman, B. T. 2002. What if Nancy Reagan’s astrologer had sued? An essay. Nova Law Review 27 (2): 277–88.
Sen, A. K. 1971. Choice functions and revealed preference. Review of Economic Studies 38 (3): 307–17.
Simpson, E. H. 1951. The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series B) 13 (2): 238–41.
Skyrms, B. 1984. Pragmatics and Empiricism. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Soares, N. and Fallenstein, B.. 2015. Toward idealized decision theory. arXiv: 1507.01986 [cs.AI].
Soares, N. and Yudkowsky, E.. 2018. Functional Decision Theory: a new theory of instrumental rationality. arXiv: 1710.05060.
Speck, F. G. 1935. Naskapi. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Spencer, J. and Wells, I.. 2019. Why take both boxes? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 99 (1): 27–48.
Stalnaker, R. 1972. Letter to David Lewis. In Harper, W. L., Stalnaker, R., and Pearce, G. (eds), Ifs: Conditionals, Belief, Decision, Chance, and Time. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1980: 151–2.
Swijtink, Z. G. 1982. A Bayesian argument for randomization. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1 (1982): 159–68.
Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, R.. 1953. Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour. 3d ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wang, Z., Xu, B., and Zhou, H.-J.. 2014. Social cycling and conditional responses in the rock-paper-scissors game. Scientific Reports 4 (article no. 5830): 1–7.
Weirich, P. 2001. Decision Space: Multidimensional Utility Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Wells, I. 2019. Equal opportunity and Newcomb’s Problem. Mind 128 (510): 429–57.
Wittgenstein, L. 1953 [2009]. Philosophical Investigations. 4th ed. Tr. Anscombe, G. E. M., Hacker, P. M. S., and Schulte, J.. Malden: Wiley.
Worrall, J. 2007. Why there’s no cause to randomize. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (3): 451–88.
Yudkowsky, E. 2010. Timeless Decision Theory. San Francisco: The Singularity Institute.
