Skip to main content
Governing the Commons
  • This book is no longer available for purchase
  • Cited by 4960
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Vittoria, Maria Patrizia 2019. New Metropolitan Perspectives. Vol. 100, Issue. , p. 599.

    Besbes, Mustapha Chahed, Jamel and Hamdane, Abdelkader 2019. National Water Security. p. 1.

    Faye, Papa Haller, Tobias and Ribot, Jesse 2018. Shaping Rules and Practice for More Justice. Local Conventions and Local Resistance in Eastern Senegal. Human Ecology, Vol. 46, Issue. 1, p. 15.

    Temple, Paul 2018. Spaces of Teaching and Learning. p. 31.

    Cosens, Barbara and Gunderson, Lance H. 2018. Practical Panarchy for Adaptive Water Governance. p. 313.

    Dasgupta, Partha Mitra, Tapan and Sorger, Gerhard 2018. Harvesting the Commons. Environmental and Resource Economics,

    Tutić, Andreas and Grehl, Sascha 2018. Status Characteristics and the Provision of Public Goods: Experimental Evidence. Sociological Science, Vol. 5, Issue. , p. 1.

    Brunton-Smith, Ian and Bullock, Karen 2018. Patterns and Drivers of Co-production in Neighbourhood Watch in England and Wales: From Neo-liberalism to New Localism. The British Journal of Criminology,

    Almog-Bar, Michal and Schmid, Hillel 2018. Cross-Sector Partnerships in Human Services: Insights and Organizational Dilemmas. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, p. 089976401877121.

    Broumas, Antonios 2018. Commons’ movements and ‘progressive’ governments as dual power: The potential for social transformation in Europe. Capital & Class, Vol. 42, Issue. 2, p. 229.

    Schlösser, Thomas Berger, Sebastian and Fetchenhauer, Detlef 2018. Justice Sensitivity and Cooperation Dynamics in Repeated Public Good Games. Social Justice Research, Vol. 31, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Frost, Karl 2018. Cultural evolution in adaptive management of grassroots activism in BC, Canada. Sustainability Science, Vol. 13, Issue. 1, p. 81.

    Obeng-Odoom, Franklin 2018. Transnational Corporations and Urban Development. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 77, Issue. 2, p. 447.


    Wojcik, Stefan 2018. Do Birds of a Feather Vote Together, or Is It Peer Influence?. Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 71, Issue. 1, p. 75.

    Lamphere, Jenna A. and Shefner, Jon 2018. How to Green: Institutional Influence in Three US Cities. Critical Sociology, Vol. 44, Issue. 2, p. 303.

    de Castro, Douglas 2018. Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Regional and Global Security. p. 207.

    Albareda, Laura and Campos, Jose Antonio 2018. Handbook of Knowledge Management for Sustainable Water Systems. p. 221.

    Hodgson, Geoffrey M. 2018. Understanding and Defining Institutions: The Contribution of Francesco Gual. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 25, Issue. 1, p. 111.

    Bowen, Frances E. Bansal, Pratima and Slawinski, Natalie 2018. Scale matters: The scale of environmental issues in corporate collective actions. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 39, Issue. 5, p. 1411.


Book description

The governance of natural resources used by many individuals in common is an issue of increasing concern to policy analysts. Both state control and privatisation of resources have been advocated, but neither the state nor the market have been uniformly successful in solving common pool resource problems. Offering a critique of the foundations of policy analysis as applied to natural resources, Elinor Ostrom here provides a unique body of empirical data to explore conditions under which common pool resource problems have been satisfactorily or unsatisfactorily solved. Dr Ostrom first describes three models most frequently used as the foundation for recommending state or market solutions. She then outlines theoretical and empirical alternatives to these models in order to illustrate the diversity of possible solutions. In the following chapters she uses institutional analysis to examine different ways - both successful and unsuccessful - of governing the commons. In contrast to the proposition of the tragedy of the commons argument, common pool problems sometimes are solved by voluntary organisations rather than by a coercive state. Among the cases considered are communal tenure in meadows and forests, irrigation communities and other water rights, and fisheries.


Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 906 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 4727 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.