References
Abdel-Rahman, R., & Melinger, A. (2009). Semantic context effects in language production: A swinging lexical network proposal and a review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 713–34.
Allum, P. H., & Wheeldon, L. R. (2007). Planning scope in spoken sentence production: The role of grammatical units. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 33, 791–810.
Allum, P. H., & Wheeldon, L. R. (2009). Scope of lexical access in spoken sentence production: Implications for the conceptual-syntactic interface. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 35, 1240–55.
Balcetis, E. E., & Dale, R. (2005). An exploration of social modulation of syntactic priming. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 27(27).
Barthel, M., & Sauppe, S. (2019). Speech planning at turn transitions in dialog is associated with increased processing load. Cognitive Science, 43, e12768.
Barthel, M., Sauppe, S., Levinson, S. C., & Meyer, A. S. (2016). The timing of utterance planning in task-oriented dialogue: Evidence from a novel list-completion paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1858.
Bernolet, S., Colleman, T., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2014). The ‘sense boost’ to dative priming: Evidence for sense-specific verb-structure links. Journal of Memory and Language, 76, 113–26.
Bernolet, S., Collina, S., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2016). The persistence of syntactic priming revisited. Journal of Memory and Language, 91, 99–116.
Bernolet, S., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2010). Does verb bias modulate syntactic priming? Cognition, 114, 455–61.
Bernolet, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2007). Shared syntactic representations in bilinguals: Evidence for the role of word-order repetition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 931–49.
Bernolet, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2009). Persistence of emphasis in language production: A cross-linguistic approach. Cognition, 112, 300–17.
Bernolet, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2012). Effects of phonological feedback on the selection of syntax: Evidence from between-language syntactic priming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 503–16.
Bernolet, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2013). From language-specific to shared syntactic representations: The influence of second language proficiency on syntactic sharing in bilinguals. Cognition, 127, 287–306.
Blasi, D. E., Henrich, J., Adamou, E., Kemmerer, D., & Majid, A. (2022). Over-reliance on English hinders cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26(12), 1153–70.
Bock, J. K. (1982). Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formulation. Psychological Review, 89, 1–47.
Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355–87.
Bock, J. K. (1987). Coordinating words and syntax in speech plans. In Ellis, A. (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language, Vol. 3 (pp. 337–90). London: Erlbaum.
Bock, K. (1989). Closed-class immanence in sentence production. Cognition, 31, 163–86.
Bock, J. K., & Ferreira, V. S. (2014). Syntactically speaking. In Goldrick, M., Ferreira, V., & Miozzo, M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language production (pp. 21–46). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bock, K., & Cutting, J. C. (1992). Regulating mental energy: Performance units in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 99–127.
Bock, K., Dell, G. S., Chang, F., & Onishi, K. H. (2007). Persistent structural priming from language comprehension to language production. Cognition, 104, 437–58.
Bock, K., & Griffin, Z. M. (2000). The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 177–92.
Bock, K., & Levelt, W. J. (1994). Language production: Grammatical encoding. In Gernsbacher, M. A. (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 945–84). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Bock, K., & Loebell, H. (1990). Framing sentences. Cognition, 35, 1–39.
Bock, K., Loebell, H., & Morey, R. (1992). From conceptual roles to structural relations: Bridging the syntactic cleft. Psychological Review, 99, 150–71.
Branigan, H. (2007). Syntactic priming. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1, 1–16.
Branigan, H. P., & Pickering, M. J. (2017). An experimental approach to linguistic representation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, 1–73.
Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & Cleland, A. A. (2000). Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75, B13–B25.
Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., McLean, J. F., & Cleland, A. A. (2007). Syntactic alignment and participant role in dialogue. Cognition, 104, 163–97.
Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., McLean, J. F., & Stewart, A. J. (2006). The role of local and global syntactic structure in language production: Evidence from syntactic priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 974–1010.
Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., Pearson, J., & McLean, J. F. (2010). Linguistic alignment between people and computers. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2355–68.
Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & Tanaka, M. (2008). Contributions of animacy to grammatical function assignment and word order during production. Lingua, 118, 172–89.
Brown, R., & McNeill, D. (1966). The ‘tip of the tongue’ phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5(4), 325–37.
Brown-Schmidt, S., & Konopka, A. E. (2008). Little houses and casas pequeñas: Message formulation and syntactic form in unscripted speech with speakers of English and Spanish. Cognition, 109, 274–80.
Bunger, A., Papafragou, A., & Trueswell, J. C. (2013). Event structure influences language production: Evidence from structural priming in motion event description. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 299–323.
Bürki, A., Elbuy, S., Madec, S., & Vasishth, S. (2020). What did we learn from forty years of research on semantic interference? A Bayesian meta-analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 114, 104125.
Butterworth, B. (1980). Evidence from pauses in speech. In Butterworth, B. (Ed.), Language production: Vol. 1. Speech and talk (pp. 155–76). London: Academic Press.
Cai, Z. G., Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (2012). Mapping concepts to syntax: Evidence from structural priming in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 833–49.
Caramazza, A., & Miozzo, M. (1997). The relation between syntactic and phonological knowledge in lexical access: Evidence from the tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon. Cognition, 64, 309–43.
Carminati, M. N., van Gompel, R. P., & Wakeford, L. J. (2019). An investigation into the lexical boost with nonhead nouns. Journal of Memory and Language, 108, 104031.
Chang, F. (2002). Symbolically speaking: A connectionist model of sentence production. Cognitive Science, 26, 609–51.
Chang, F., Bock, K., & Goldberg, A. E. (2003). Can thematic roles leave traces of their places? Cognition, 90, 29–49.
Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K. J. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113, 234–72.
Chang, F., Janciauskas, M., & Fitz, H. (2012). Language adaptation and learning: Getting explicit about implicit learning. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6, 259–78.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2016). The now-or-never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, e62.
Christensen, P., Fusaroli, R., & Tylén, K. (2016). Environmental constraints shaping constituent order in emerging communication systems: Structural iconicity, interactive alignment and conventionalization. Cognition, 146, 67–80.
Christianson, K., & Ferreira, F. (2005). Conceptual accessibility and sentence production in a free word order language (Odawa). Cognition, 98, 105–35.
Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1–39.
Cleland, A. A., & Pickering, M. J. (2003). The use of lexical and syntactic information in language production: Evidence from the priming of noun-phrase structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 214–30.
Corps, R. E., Knudsen, B., & Meyer, A. S. (2022). Overrated gaps: Inter-speaker gaps provide limited information about the timing of turns in conversation. Cognition, 223, 105037.
Coyle, J. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2008). Patterns of experience with verbs affect long-term cumulative structural priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 967–70.
Cycowicz, Y. M., Friedman, D., Rothstein, M., Snodgrass, J.G. (1997) Picture naming by young children: norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 65 (2), 171–237.
Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–321.
Dell, G. S., & Chang, F. (2014). The P-chain: Relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369, 20120394.
Dell, G. S., & Jacobs, C. L. (2016). Successful speaking: Cognitive mechanisms of adaptation in language production. In Hickok, G. and Small, S. L. (Eds.), Neurobiology of language (pp. 209–19). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Dell, G. S., Nozari, N., & Oppenheim, G. M. (2014). Word production: Behavioral and computational considerations. In Goldrick, M., Ferreira, V. S., & Miozzo, M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language production (pp. 88–104). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dell, G. S., Oppenheim, G. M., & Kittredge, A. K. (2008). Saying the right word at the right time: Syntagmatic and paradigmatic interference in sentence production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 583–608.
Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104, 801–38.
Fairs, A., Bögels, S., & Meyer, A. S. (2018). Dual-tasking with simple linguistic tasks: Evidence for serial processing. Acta Psychologica, 191, 131–48.
Fargier, R., & Laganaro, M. (2016). Neurophysiological modulations of non-verbal and verbal dual-tasks interference during word planning. PLOS ONE, 11, e0168358.
Fehér, O., Wonnacott, E., & Smith, K. (2016). Structural priming in artificial languages and the regularisation of unpredictable variation. Journal of Memory and Language, 91, 158–80.
Fellbaum, C. (2019). How flexible are idioms? A corpus-based study. Linguistics, 57, 735–67.
Ferreira, F. (2000). Syntax in language production: An approach using tree-adjoining grammars. In Wheeldon, L. (Ed.), Aspects of language production (pp. 291–330). San Diego, CA: Psychology Press.
Ferreira, F., & Swets, B. (2002). How incremental is language production? Evidence from the production of utterances requiring the computation of arithmetic sums. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 57–84.
Ferreira, V. S. (2003). The persistence of optional complementizer production: Why saying ‘that’ is not saying ‘that’ at all. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 379–98.
Ferreira, V. S., & Bock, K. (2006). The functions of structural priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 1011–29.
Ferreira, V. S., Bock, K., Wilson, M. P., & Cohen, N. J. (2008). Memory for syntax despite amnesia. Psychological Science, 19, 940–6.
Ferreira, V. S., Kleinman, D., Kraljic, T., & Siu, Y. (2012). Do priming effects in dialogue reflect partner-or task-based expectations? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 309–16.
Ferreira, V. S., Morgan, A., & Slevc, R. L. (2018). Grammatical encoding. In Rueschemeyer, S.-A. & Gaskell, G. M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 432–57). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ferreira, V. S., & Slevc, L. R. (2007). Grammatical encoding. In Gaskell, M. G. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 453–70). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fisher, C. (2002). The role of abstract syntactic knowledge in language acquisition: A reply to Tomasello (2000). Cognition, 82, 259–78.
Fitz, H., & Chang, F. (2017). Meaningful questions: The acquisition of auxiliary inversion in a connectionist model of sentence production. Cognition, 166, 225–50.
Fox Tree, J. E., & Meijer, P. J. A. (1999). Building syntactic structure in speaking. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 71–92.
Frank, R. (2002). Phrase structure composition and syntactic dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fuchs, S., Petrone, C., Krivokapić, J., & Hoole, P. (2013). Acoustic and respiratory evidence for utterance planning in German. Journal of Phonetics, 41, 29–47.
Garrett, M. F. (1975). The analysis of sentence production. In Psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 9, Issue C, pp. 133–77). New York: Academic Press.
Garrett, M. F. (1980a). Levels of processing in sentence production. In Butterworth, B. (Ed.), Language production: Vol. 1. Speech and talk (pp. 177–220). London: Academic Press.
Garrett, M. F. (1980b). The limits of accommodation: Arguments for independent processing levels in sentence production. In Fromkin, V. A. (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen and hand (pp. 263–71). New York: Academic Press.
Gilbert, A. C., Cousineau-Perusse, M., & Titone, D. (2020). L2 exposure modulates the scope of planning during first and second language production. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(5), 1093–105.
Gleitman, L. R., January, D., Nappa, R., & Trueswell, J. C. (2007). On the give and take between event apprehension and utterance formulation. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(4), 544–69.
Goldman Eisler, F. (1968). Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. New York: Academic Press.
Gollan, T. H., & Acenas, L. A. R. (2004). What is a TOT? Cognate and translation effects on tip-of-the-tongue states in Spanish-English and Tagalog-English bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 246–69.
Gries, S. T. (2005). Syntactic priming: A corpus-based approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34, 365–99.
Griffin, Z. M. (2001). Gaze durations during speech reflect word selection and phonological encoding. Cognition, 82, 1–16.
Griffin, Z. M., & Bock, K. J. (2000). What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science, 11, 274–9.
Griffin, Z. M., & Davison, J. C. (2011). A technical introduction to using speakers’ eye movements to study language. The Mental Lexicon, 6, 53–82.
Gruberg, N., Ostrand, R., Momma, S., & Ferreira, V. S. (2019). Syntactic entrainment: The repetition of syntactic structures in event descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language, 107, 216–32.
Hardy, S. M., Segaert, K., & Wheeldon, L. (2020). Healthy aging and sentence production: Disrupted lexical access in the context of intact syntactic planning. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 257.
Hardy, S. M., Wheeldon, L., & Segaert, K. (2020). Structural priming is determined by global syntax rather than internal phrasal structure: Evidence from young and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46, 720–40.
Hare, M. L., & Goldberg, A. E. (2000). Structural priming: purely syntactic? In Hahn, M. & Stones, S. C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-first annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 208–11), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hartsuiker, R. J., & Bernolet, S. (2017). The development of shared syntax in second language learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20, 219–34.
Hartsuiker, R. J., Bernolet, S., Schoonbaert, S., Speybroeck, S., & Vanderelst, D. (2008). Syntactic priming persists while the lexical boost decays: Evidence from written and spoken dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 214–38.
Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2008). Language integration in bilingual sentence production. Acta Psychologica, 128, 479–89.
Hartsuiker, R. J., Pickering, M. J., & Veltkamp, E. (2004). Is syntax separate or shared between languages? Crosslinguistic syntactic priming in Spanish-English bilinguals. Psychological Science, 15, 409–14.
Heyselaar, E., Hagoort, P., & Segaert, K. (2017). In dialogue with an avatar, language behavior is identical to dialogue with a human partner. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 46–60.
Heyselaar, E., Segaert, K., Walvoort, S. J. W., Kessels, R. P. C., & Hagoort, P. (2017). The role of procedural memory in the skill for language: Evidence from syntactic priming inpatients with amnesia. Neuropsychologia, 101, 97–105.
Heyselaar, E., Wheeldon, L., & Segaert, K. (2021). Structural priming is supported by different components of nondeclarative memory: Evidence from priming across the lifespan. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47, 820–37.
Huettig, F., Rommers, J., & Meyer, A. S. (2011). Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation. Acta Psychologica, 137, 151–71.
Hwang, H., & Chun, E. (2018). Influence of social perception and social monitoring on structural priming. Cognitive Science, 42, 303–13.
Hwang, H., & Kaiser, E. (2014a). Having a syntactic choice is not always better: The effects of syntactic flexibility on Korean production. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 1115–31.
Hwang, H., & Kaiser, E. (2014b). The role of the verb in grammatical function assignment in English and Korean. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1363–73.
Hwang, H., & Kaiser, E. (2015). Accessibility effects on production vary cross-linguistically: Evidence from English and Korean. Journal of Memory and Language, 84, 190–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.06.004. Hwang, H., & Shin, J. A. (2019). Cumulative effects of syntactic experience in a between- and a within-language context: Evidence for implicit learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 109, 104054.
Ivanova, I., Branigan, H. P., McLean, J. F., Costa, A., & Pickering, M. J. (2017) Do you what I say? People reconstruct the syntax of anomalous utterances. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 32, 175–89.
Ivanova, I., Horton, W. S., Swets, B., Kleinman, D., & Ferreira, V. S. (2020). Structural alignment in dialogue and monologue (and what attention may have to do with it). Journal of Memory and Language, 110, 104052.
Ivanova, I., Pickering, M. J., Branigan, H. P., McLean, J. F., & Costa, A. (2012). The comprehension of anomalous sentences: Evidence from structural priming. Cognition, 122, 193–209.
Jackson, C. N. (2018). Second language structural priming: A critical review and directions for future research. Second Language Research, 34, 539–52.
Jackson, C. N., & Ruf, H. T. (2017). The priming of word order in second language German. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38, 315–45.
Jackson, C. N., & Ruf, H. T. (2018). The importance of prime repetition among intermediate-level second language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 677–92.
Jaeger, T. F., & Snider, N. E. (2013). Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime’s prediction error given both prior and recent experience. Cognition, 127, 57–83.
Jongman, S. R., Meyer, A. S., & Roelofs, A. (2015). The role of sustained attention in the production of conjoined noun phrases: An individual differences study. PLOS ONE, 10, e0137557.
Jongman, S. R., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (2015). Sustained attention in language production: An individual differences investigation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 710–30.
Kaan, E., & Chun, E. (2018). Priming and adaptation in native speakers and second-language learners. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21, 228–42.
Karimi, H., & Ferreira, F. (2016). Good-enough linguistic representations and online cognitive equilibrium in language processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 1013–40.
Kaschak, M. P. (2007). Long-term structural priming affects subsequent patterns of language production. Memory & Cognition, 35, 925–37.
Kaschak, M. P., & Borreggine, K. L. (2008). Is long-term structural priming affected by patterns of experience with individual verbs? Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 862–78.
Kaschak, M. P., Kutta, T. J., & Schatschneider, C. (2011). Long-term cumulative structural priming persists for (at least) one week. Memory & Cognition, 39, 381–8.
Kaschak, M. P., Loney, R. A., & Borreggine, K. L. (2006). Recent experience affects the strength of structural priming. Cognition, 99, B73–B82.
Kempen, G., & Hoenkamp, E. (1987). An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation. Cognitive Science, 11, 201–58.
Kempen, G., & Huijbers, P. (1983). The lexicalization process in sentence production and naming: Indirect election of words. Cognition, 14, 185–209.
Khoe, Y. H., Tsoukala, C., Kootstra, G. J., & Frank, S. L. (2021). Is structural priming between different languages a learning effect? Modelling priming as error-driven implicit learning. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 1–21.
Konopka, A. E. (2012). Planning ahead: How recent experience with structures and words changes the scope of linguistic planning. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 143–62.
Konopka, A. E. (2019). Encoding actions and verbs: Tracking the time-course of relational encoding during message and sentence formulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45, 1486–510.
Konopka, A. E., & Bock, J. K. (2005). Helping syntax out: How much do words do? Paper presented at the 18th CUNY Human Sentence Processing Conference (CUNY 2005), Arizona, United States.
Konopka, A. E., & Bock, K. (2009). Lexical or syntactic control of sentence formulation? Structural generalizations from idiom production. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 68–101.
Konopka, A. E., & Brown-Schmidt, S. (2014). Message encoding. In Goldrick, M., Ferreira, V., & Miozzo, M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language production (pp. 3–20). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Konopka, A. E., & Kuchinsky, S. E. (2015). How message similarity shapes the timecourse of sentence formulation. Journal of Memory and Language, 84, 1–23.
Konopka, A. E., & Meyer, A. S. (2014). Priming sentence planning. Cognitive Psychology, 73, 1–40.
Konopka, A. E., Meyer, A. S., & Forest, T. A. (2018). Planning to speak in L1 and L2. Cognitive Psychology, 102, 72–104.
Kootstra, G. J., & Doedens, W. J. (2016). How multiple sources of experience influence bilingual syntactic choice: Immediate and cumulative cross-language effects of structural priming, verb bias, and language dominance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 710–32.
Kuchinsky, S. E., & Bock, K. (2010). From seeing to saying: Perceiving, planning, producing. Paper presented at the 23rd meeting of the CUNY Human Sentence Processing Conference, New York, NY.
Lee, E. K., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Watson, D. G. (2013). Ways of looking ahead: Hierarchical planning in language production. Cognition, 129, 544–62.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1992). Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representations. Cognition, 42, 1–22.
Levelt, W. J., & Kelter, S. (1982). Surface form and memory in question answering. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 78–106.
Levelt, W. J. M., & Maassen, B. (1981). Lexical search and order of mention in sentence production. In Klein, W. & Levelt, W. J. M. (Eds.), Crossing the boundaries in linguistics (pp. 221–52). Dortrecht: Reidel.
Levelt, W. J. M., & Meyer, A. S. (2000). Word for word: Multiple lexical access in speech production. The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 433–52.
Levelt, W. J., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–38.
Levinson, S. C., & Torreira, F. (2015). Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 731.
Li, C., Ferreira, V. S., & Gollan, T. H. (2022). Language control after phrasal planning: Playing whack-a-mole with language switch costs. Journal of Memory and Language, 126, 104338.
Lindsay, L., Gambi, C., & Rabagliati, H. (2019). Preschoolers optimize the timing of their conversational turns through flexible coordination of language comprehension and production. Psychological Science, 30, 504–15.
Loebell, H., & Bock, K. (2003). Structural priming across languages. Linguistics, 41, 791–824.
Mahon, B. Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, K. A., & Caramazza, A. (2007). Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(3), 503–35.
Mahowald, K., James, A., Futrell, R., & Gibson, E. (2016). A meta-analysis of syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 91, 5–27.
Malpass, D., & Meyer, A. S. (2010). The time course of name retrieval during multiple-object naming: Evidence from extrafoveal-on-foveal effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(2), 523–37.
Martin, R. C. (2021). The critical role of semantic working memory in language processing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30, 283–91.
Martin, R. C., Crowther, J. E., Knight, M., Tamborello, F. P., & Yang, C. L. (2010). Planning in sentence production: Evidence for the phrase as a default planning scope. Cognition, 116, 177–92.
Martin, R. C., & Freedman, M. L. (2001). Short-term retention of lexical-semantic representations: Implications for speech production. Memory, 9(4–6), 261–80.
Martin, R. C., Miller, M., & Vu, H. (2004). Lexical-semantic retention and speech production: Further evidence from normal and brain-damaged participants for a phrasal scope of planning. level. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 625–44.
Martin, R. C., & Schnur, T. T. (2019). Independent contributions of semantic and phonological working memory to spontaneous speech in acute stroke. Cortex, 112, 58–68.
Martin, R. C., & Slevc, L. R. (2014). Language production and working memory. In Goldrick, M., Ferreria, V. S., & Miozzo, M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language production (pp. 120–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Martin, R. C., Yan, H., & Schnur, T. T. (2014). Working memory and planning during sentence production. Acta Psychologica, 152, 120–32.
Melinger, A., & Dobel, C. (2005). Lexically-driven syntactic priming. Cognition, 98, B11–B20.
Messenger, K., Branigan, H. P., & McLean, J. F. (2011). Evidence for (shared) abstract structure underlying children’s short and full passives. Cognition, 121, 268–74.
Messenger, K., Branigan, H. P., McLean, J. F., & Sorace, A. (2012). Is young children’s passive syntax semantically constrained? Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 568–87.
Meyer, A. S. (1996). Lexical access in phrase and sentence production: Results from picture-word interference experiments. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 477–96.
Meyer, A. S., & Bock, K. (1992). The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: Blocking or partial activation? Memory & Cognition, 20(6), 715–26.
Meyer, A. S., Sleiderink, A. M., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1998). Viewing and naming objects: Eye movements during noun phrase production. Cognition, 66, B25–B33.
Meyer, A. S., Wheeldon, L., Van der Meulen, F., & Konopka, A. (2012). Effects of speech rate and practice on the allocation of visual attention in multiple object naming. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 39.
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J. et al. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex ‘frontal lobe’ tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.
Momma, S. (2021). Filling the gap in gap-filling: Long-distance dependency formation in sentence production. Cognitive Psychology, 129, 101411.
Momma, S. (2022). Producing filler-gap dependencies: Structural priming evidence for two distinct combinatorial processes in production. Journal of Memory and Language, 126, 104349.
Momma, S., Buffinton, J., Slevc, L. R., & Phillips, C. (2020). Syntactic category constrains lexical competition in speaking. Cognition, 197, 104183.
Momma, S., & Ferreira., V. (2021). Beyond linear order: The role of argument structure in speaking. Cognitive Psychology, 128, 101397.
Momma, S., & Phillips, C. (2018). The relationship between parsing and generation. Annual Review of Linguistics, 4, 233–54.
Momma, S., Slevc, L., & Phillips, C. (2015). The timing of verb planning in active and passive sentence production. Poster presented at the 28th annual CUNY conference on Human Sentence Processing.
Momma, S., Slevc, L. R., & Phillips, C. (2016). The timing of verb selection in Japanese sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 813–24.
Momma, S., Slevc, L. R., & Phillips, C. (2018). Unaccusativity in sentence production. Linguistic Inquiry, 49, 181–94.
Morgan, J. L., & Meyer, A. S. (2005). Processing of extrafoveal objects during multiple object naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 428–42.
Myachykov, A., Garrod, S., & Scheepers, C. (2010). Perceptual priming of structural choice during English and Finnish sentence production. In Mishra, R. K. and Srinivasan, N. (Eds.), Language & cognition: State of the art (pp. 54–72). Munich: Lincom Europa.
Myachykov, A., Garrod, S., & Scheepers, C. (2018). Attention and memory play different roles in syntactic choice during sentence production. Discourse Processes, 55, 218–29.
Myachykov, A., Scheepers, C., Garrod, S., Thompson, D., & Fedorova, O. (2013). Syntactic flexibility and competition in sentence production: The case of English and Russian. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 1601–19.
Myachykov, A., Thompson, D., Scheepers, C., & Garrod, S. (2011). Visual attention and structural choice in sentence production across languages. Language and Linguistics Compass, 5, 95–107.
Myachykov, A., & Tomlin, R. S. (2008). Perceptual priming and structural choice in Russian sentence production. Journal of Cognitive Science, 6, 31–48.
Norcliffe, E., & Konopka, A. E. (2015). Vision and language in cross-linguistic research on sentence production. In Mishra, R. K., Srinivasan, N., & Huettig, F. (Eds.), Attention and vision in language processing (pp. 77–96). New York: Springer.
Norcliffe, E., Konopka, A. E., Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). Word order affects the time course of sentence formulation in Tzeltal. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30, 1187–208.
Oppenheim, G. M., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2010). The dark side of incremental learning: A model of cumulative semantic interference during lexical access in speech production. Cognition, 114, 227–52.
Oppenheim, G. M., & Nozari, N. (2021). Behavioral interference or facilitation does not distinguish between competitive and noncompetitive accounts of lexical selection in word production. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 43, 625–31.
Peter, M., Chang, F., Pine, J. M., Blything, R., & Rowland, C. F. (2015). When and how do children develop knowledge of verb argument structure? Evidence from verb bias effects in a structural priming task. Journal of Memory and Language, 81, 1–15.
Petrone, C., Fuchs, S., & Krivovokapić, J. (2011). Consequences of working memory differences and phrasal length on pause duration and fundamental frequency. In Proceedings of the 9th International Seminar on Speech Production (Montréal, QC) (pp. 393–400).
Piai, V., & Roelofs, A. (2013). Working memory capacity and dual-task interference in picture naming. Acta Psychologica, 142, 332–42.
Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 633–51.
Pickering, M. J., & Ferreira, V. S. (2008). Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 427–59.
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169–90.
Prat-Sala, M., & Branigan, H. P. (2000). Discourse constraints on syntactic processing in language production: A cross-linguistic study in English and Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 168–82.
Reitter, D., Keller, F., & Moore, J. D. (2011). A computational cognitive model of syntactic priming. Cognitive Science, 35, 587–637.
Reitter, D., & Moore, J. D. (2014). Alignment and task success in spoken dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 76, 29–46.
Roberts, S. G., Torreira, F., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). The effects of processing and sequence organization on the timing of turn taking: A corpus study. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 509.
Roelofs, A., & Ferreira, V. S. (2019). The architecture of speaking. In Hagoort, P. (Ed.), Human language: From genes and brains to behavior (pp. 35–50). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Roelofs, A., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1998). A case for the lemma/lexeme distinction in models of speaking: Comment on Caramazza and Miozzo (1997). Cognition, 69, 219–30.
Roelofs, A., & Piai, V. (2011). Attention demands of spoken word planning: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 307.
Roeser, J., Torrance, M. C., & Baguley, T. S. (2019). Advance planning in written and spoken sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 1993–2009.
Rowland, C. F., Chang, F., Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., & Lieven, E. V. (2012). The development of abstract syntax: Evidence from structural priming and the lexical boost. Cognition, 125, 49–63.
Salamoura, A., & Williams, J. N. (2006). Lexical activation of cross-language syntactic priming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9, 299–307.
Santesteban, M., Pickering, M. J., & McLean, J. F. (2010). Lexical and phonological effects on syntactic processing: Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 347–66.
Sarvasy, H. S., Morgan, A. M., Yu, J., Ferreira, V., & Momma, S. (2022). Cross-clause planning in Nungon (Papua New Guinea): Eye-tracking evidence. Memory & Cognition, 1, 1–15.
Sauppe, S., Norcliffe, E., Konopka, A. E., Van Valin, R. D., & Levinson, S. C. (2013). Dependencies first: Eye tracking evidence from sentence production in Tagalog. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 35(35), 1265–70.
Scheepers, C., Raffray, C. N., & Myachykov, A. (2017). The lexical boost effect is not diagnostic of lexically-specific syntactic representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 95, 102–15.
Scheepers, C., & Sturt, P. (2014). Bidirectional syntactic priming across cognitive domains: From arithmetic to language and back. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1643–54.
Scheepers, C., Sturt, P., Martin, C. J. et al. (2011). Structural priming across cognitive domains: From simple arithmetic to relative-clause attachment. Psychological Science, 22, 1319–26.
Schoonbaert, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2007). The representation of lexical and syntactic information in bilinguals: Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 153–71.
Schoot, L., Hagoort, P., & Segaert, K. (2019). Stronger syntactic alignment in the presence of an interlocutor. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 685.
Schlenter, J., Esaulova, Y., Dolscheid, S., & Penke, M. (2022). Ambiguity in case marking does not affect the description of transitive events in German: Evidence from sentence production and eye-tracking. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 37, 844–65.
Schotter, E. R., Ferreira, V. S., & Rayner, K. (2013). Parallel object activation and attentional gating of information: Evidence from eye movements in the multiple object naming paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 365–74.
Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 86–102.
Schriefers, H., Teruel, E., and Meinshausen, R. M. (1998). Producing simple sentences: Results from picture-word interference experiments. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 609–32.
Segaert, K., Lucas, S. J. E., Burley, C. V. et al. (2018). Higher physical fitness levels are associated with less language decline in healthy ageing. Scientific Reports, 8, 6715.
Segaert, K., Weber, K., Cladder-Micus, M., & Hagoort, P. (2014). The influence of verb-bound syntactic preferences on the processing of syntactic structures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1448–60.
Segaert, K., Wheeldon, L., & Hagoort, P. (2016). Unifying structural priming effects on syntactic choices and timing of sentence generation. Journal of Memory and Language, 91, 59–80.
Shao, Z., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (2012). Sources of individual differences in the speed of naming objects and actions: The contribution of executive control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1927–44.
Sjerps, M. J., & Meyer, A. S. (2015). Variation in dual-task performance reveals late initiation of speech planning in turn-taking. Cognition, 136, 304–24.
Slobin, D. (1982). Universal and particular in the acquisition of language. In Wanner, E. & Gleitman, L. (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 128–72). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, M. C. (2000). Conceptual structures in language production. In Wheeldon, L. (Ed.), Aspects of language production (pp. 331–74). Hove: Psychology Press.
Smith, M., & Wheeldon, L. R. (1999). High level processing scope in spoken sentence production. Cognition, 73, 205–46.
Smith, M., & Wheeldon, L. (2001). Syntactic priming in spoken sentence production: An online study. Cognition, 78(2), 123–64.
Smith, M., & Wheeldon, L. R. (2004). Horizontal information flow in spoken sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30, 675–86.
Steedman, M. (2000). The syntactic process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Suffill, E., Kutasi, T., Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (2021). Lexical alignment is affected by addressee but not speaker nativeness. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 24, 746–57.
Swets, B., Desmet, T., Hambrick, D. Z., & Ferreira, F. (2007). The role of working memory in syntactic ambiguity resolution: A psychometric approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(1), 64–81.
Swets, B., Fuchs, S., Krivokapić, J., & Petrone, C. (2021). A cross-linguistic study of individual differences in speech planning. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 655516.
Swets, B., Jacovina, M. E., & Gerrig, R. J. (2014). Individual differences in the scope of speech planning: Evidence from eye-movements. Language and Cognition, 6, 12–44.
Tanaka, M. N., Branigan, H. P., McLean, J. F., & Pickering, M. J. (2011). Conceptual influences on word order and voice in sentence production: Evidence from Japanese. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 318–30.
Tomasello, M. (2000). The item-based nature of children’s early syntactic development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 156–63.
Tooley, K. M., & Bock, K. (2014). On the parity of structural persistence in language production and comprehension. Cognition, 132, 101–36.
Torreira, F., Bögels, S., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). Breathing for answering: The time course of response planning in conversation. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 284.
van Gompel, R. P., & Arai, M. (2018). Structural priming in bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21, 448–55.
van Gompel, R. P., Wakeford, L. J., & Kantola, L. (2022). No looking back: The effects of visual cues on the lexical boost in structural priming. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 38, 1–10.
van de Cavey, J., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2016). Is there a domain-general cognitive structuring system? Evidence from structural priming across music, math, action descriptions, and language. Cognition, 146, 172–84.
van de Velde, M., Meyer, A. S., & Konopka, A. E. (2014). Message formulation and structural assembly: Describing ‘easy’ and ‘hard’ events with preferred and dispreferred syntactic structures. Journal of Memory and Language, 71, 124–44.
Wagner, V., Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H. (2010). On the flexibility of grammatical advance planning during sentence production: Effects of cognitive load on multiple lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 423–40.
Weatherholtz, K., Campbell-Kibler, K., & Jaeger, T. F. (2014). Socially-mediated syntactic alignment. Language Variation and Change, 26, 387–420.
Wheeldon, L. (2011). Generating spoken sentences: The relationship between words and syntax. Language and Linguistic Compass, 5, 310–21.
Wheeldon, L. R. (2013). Producing spoken sentences: The scope of incremental planning. In Fuchs, S., Weirich, M., Pape, D., & Perrier, P. (Eds.), Speech production and perception: Vol. 1. Speech planning and dynamics (pp. 97–118). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Wheeldon, L. R., & Konopka, A. (2018). Spoken word production: Representation, retrieval, and integration. In Rueschemeyer, S-A. & Gaskell, M. G. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 335–71). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wheeldon, L., & Lahiri, A. (1997). Prosodic units in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 356–81.
Wheeldon, L. R., & Lahiri, A. (2002). The minimal unit of phonological encoding: Prosodic or lexical word. Cognition, 85, B31–B41.
Wheeldon, L. R., & Meyer, A. (2005). Planning sentence structure: Speech latency and gaze patterns during the production of word lists and sentence. Paper presented at the 4th Workshop on Language Production, Maastricht.
Wheeldon, L. R., Ohlson, N., Ashby, A., & Gator, S. (2013). Lexical availability and grammatical encoding scope during spoken sentence production. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 1653–73.
Wheeldon, L. R., & Smith, M. C. (2003). Phrase structure priming: A short-lived effect. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 431–42.
Wheeldon, L. R., Smith, M. C., & Apperly, I. (2011). Repeating words in sentences: Effects of sentence structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1051–64.
Whittlesea, B. W., & Wright, R. L. (1997). Implicit (and explicit) learning: Acting adaptively without knowing the consequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 181–200.
Wilson, V. A., Zuberbühler, K., & Bickel, B. (2022). The evolutionary origins of syntax: Event cognition in nonhuman primates. Science Advances, 8(25), eabn8464.
Wynne, H. S., Wheeldon, L., & Lahiri, A. (2018). Compounds, phrases and clitics in connected speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 98, 45–58.
Yan, H., Martin, R. C., & Slevc, L. R. (2018). Lexical overlap increases syntactic priming in aphasia independently of short-term memory abilities: Evidence against the explicit memory account of the lexical boost. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 48, 76–89.
Zhang, C., Bernolet, S., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2020). The role of explicit memory in syntactic persistence: Effects of lexical cueing and load on sentence memory and sentence production. PLOS ONE, 15, e0240909.
Zhao, L. M., Alario, F. X., & Yang, Y. F. (2014). Grammatical planning scope in sentence production: Further evidence for the functional phrase hypothesis. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 1059–75.
Ziegler, J., Bencini, G., Goldberg, A., & Snedeker, J. (2019). How abstract is syntax? Evidence from structural priming. Cognition, 193, 104045.
Ziegler, J., & Snedeker, J. (2018). How broad are thematic roles? Evidence from structural priming. Cognition, 179, 221–40.
Ziegler, J., Snedeker, J., & Wittenberg, E. (2017). Event structures drive semantic structural priming, not thematic roles: Evidence from idioms and light verbs. Cognitive Science, 42, 2918–49.
