Crossref Citations
This Book has been
cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Kapiszewski, Diana
Silverstein, Gordon
and
Kagan, Robert A.
2013.
Consequential Courts.
p.
1.
Ansolabehere Sesti, Karina
2014.
Difusores y justicieros. Las instituciones judiciales en la política de derechos humanos.
Perfiles Latinoamericanos,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 44,
p.
143.
Elias, José Sebastián
2015.
Fair Reflection of Society in Judicial Systems - A Comparative Study.
Vol. 7,
Issue. ,
p.
23.
Arlota, Carolina
and
Garoupa, Nuno M.
2015.
Do Specialized Courts Make a Difference? Evidence from Brazilian State Supreme Courts.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Desposato, Scott W.
Ingram, Matthew C.
and
Lannes, Osmar P.
2015.
Power, Composition, and Decision Making: The Behavioral Consequences of Institutional Reform on Brazil’sSupremo Tribunal Federal.
Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 3,
p.
534.
Ingram, Matthew C.
2016.
Justices and Journalists.
p.
58.
Scribner, Druscilla
2016.
Justices and Journalists.
p.
14.
Tiede, Lydia B.
2016.
The political determinants of judicial dissent: evidence from the Chilean Constitutional Tribunal.
European Political Science Review,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 3,
p.
377.
Da Ros, Luciano
and
Taylor, Matthew
2017.
Opening the Black Box: Three Decades of Reforms to Brazil's Judicial System.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Engelmann, Fabiano
2017.
La Lutte Anti-Corruption AU Brrsil Des Annns 2000: Entre LL Activisme Politico-Judiciaire Et Les Vertus Du Marchh International (Fight Against Corruption in Brazil in the 2000s: Between the Political and Judicial Activism and the Virtues of the International Business).
SSRN Electronic Journal ,
Huebert, Erin T.
and
Liu, Amy H.
2017.
Ethnic identity and attitudes toward state institutions: evidence of judicial legitimacy among the indigenous in Latin America.
Politics, Groups, and Identities,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 4,
p.
561.
Dressel, Björn
Sanchez-Urribarri, Raul
and
Stroh, Alexander
2017.
The Informal Dimension of Judicial Politics: A Relational Perspective.
Annual Review of Law and Social Science,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 1,
p.
413.
Miller, Lisa L.
2018.
The Use of Case Studies in Law and Social Science Research.
Annual Review of Law and Social Science,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
381.
Novaes, Lucas M.
2018.
Disloyal Brokers and Weak Parties.
American Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 62,
Issue. 1,
p.
84.
Dressel, Björn
and
Inoue, Tomoo
2018.
Informal networks and judicial decisions: Insights from the Supreme Court of the Philippines, 1986–2015.
International Political Science Review,
Vol. 39,
Issue. 5,
p.
616.
Greenspan, Rosann
Aviram, Hadar
and
Simon, Jonathan
2019.
The Legal Process and the Promise of Justice.
Brinks, Daniel M.
Levitsky, Steven
and
Murillo, Maria Victoria
2019.
Understanding Institutional Weakness.
Massoud, Mark Fathi
2019.
The Legal Process and the Promise of Justice.
p.
314.
Antía, Florencia
and
Vairo, Daniela
2019.
La Suprema Corte de Justicia en Uruguay: entre instituciones formales e informales (1985-2018).
OPERA,
p.
27.
Botero, Sandra
Ellett, Rachel
Keck, Thomas M.
and
Stohler, Stephan
2019.
Free Expression and Judicial Power in the Global South.
SSRN Electronic Journal ,