Contents

pp vii-xii

Acknowledgments

pp xiii-xiv

Introduction

pp 1-6

PART ONE - FIVE COMMON OBJECTIONS TO HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE CLONING REFLECT, REINFORCE, AND INSPIRE STEREOTYPES ABOUT HUMAN CLONES

pp 7-9

1 - Does Human Reproductive Cloning Offend God and Nature?

pp 10-16

2 - Should Children Be Begotten and Not Made?

pp 17-21

3 - Do Human Clones Lack Individuality?

pp 22-34

4 - Could Human Clones Destroy Humanity?

pp 35-43

5 - Does Human Reproductive Cloning Harm Participants and Produce Children with Birth Defects?

pp 44-69

Summary of Part One

pp 70-72

PART TWO - ANTICLONING LAWS ARE BAD PUBLIC POLICY

pp 73-74

6 - What Anticloning Laws Say and Do

pp 75-89

7 - The Five Objections Have Inspired Anticloning Laws

pp 90-97

8 - Anticloning Laws Reflect a Policy of Existential Segregation

pp 98-108

9 - The Costs of Anticloning Laws Outweigh Their Benefits

pp 109-146

Summary of Part Two

pp 147-148

PART THREE - ANTICLONING LAWS VIOLATE THE EQUAL PROTECTION GUARANTEE AND ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL

pp 149-153

10 - Anticloning Laws Classify Human Clones and Are Subject to Strict Scrutiny

pp 154-175

11 - Anticloning Laws Inflict Judicially Cognizable Injuries that Confer Standing

pp 176-189

12 - Anticloning Laws Violate the Equal Protection Guarantee

pp 190-212

Conclusion

pp 213-216

Notes

pp 217-266

Index

pp 267-272