References
Acharya, Sushant, and Wee, Shu Lin (2020): “Rational inattention in hiring decisions,” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 12(1), 1–40.
Agranov, Marina, Caplin, Andrew, and Tergiman, Chloe (2015): “Naive play and the process of choice in guessing games,” Journal of the Economic Science Association, 1(2), 146–157.
Agranov, Marina, and Ortoleva, Pietro (2017): “Stochastic choice and preferences for randomization,” Journal of Political Economy, 125(1), 40–68.
Allred, Sarah R., Crawford, L. Elizabeth, Duffy, Sean, and Smith, John (2016): “Working memory and spatial judgments: Cognitive load increases the central tendency bias,” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23(6), 1825–1831.
Alós-Ferrer, Carlos, Fehr, Ernst, and Netzer, Nick (2021): “Time will tell: Recovering preferences when choices are noisy,” Journal of Political Economy, 129(6), 1828–1877.
Alós-Ferrer, Carlos, and Garagnani, Michele (2021): “Choice consistency and strength of preference,” Economics Letters, 198, 109672.
Alós-Ferrer, Carlos, and Garagnani, Michele (2022a): “Strength of preference and decisions under risk,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 64, 309–329.
Alós-Ferrer, Carlos, and Garagnani, Michele (2022b): “The gradual nature of economic errors,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 200, 55–66.
Luis, Amador-Hidalgo, Pablo, Brañas-Garza, Espín, Antonio M., García-Muñoz, Teresa, and Hernández-Román, Ana (2021): “Cognitive abilities and risk-taking: Errors, not preferences,” European Economic Review, 134, 103694.
American Psychological Association (2010): Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. Washington, DC, 6th ed.
Anderson, Norman H. (1970): “Functional measurement and psychophysical judgment,” Psychological Review, 77(3), 153–170.
Antonides, Gerrit (2008): “How is perceived inflation related to actual price changes in the European Union?” Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(4), 417–432.
Gerrit, Antonides, Verhoef, Peter C., and Van Aalst, Marcel (2002): “Consumer perception and evaluation of waiting time: A field experiment,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(3), 193–202.
Apesteguia, Jose, and Ballester, Miguel A. (2021): “Separating predicted randomness from residual behavior,” Journal of the European Economic Association, 19(2), 1041–1076.
Jose, Apesteguia, Ballester, Miguel A., and Jay, Lu (2017): “Single‐crossing random utility models,” Econometrica, 85(2), 661–674.
Argenziano, Rossella, and Gilboa, Itzhak (2017): “Psychophysical foundations of the Cobb–Douglas utility function,” Economics Letters, 157, 21–23.
Ariely, Dan, Kamenica, Emir, and Prelec, Dražen (2008): “Man’s search for meaning: The case of Legos,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 67(3–4), 671–677.
Ballinger, T. Parker, and Wilcox, Nathaniel T. (1997): “Decisions, error and heterogeneity,” Economic Journal, 107(443), 1090–1105.
Bayrak, Oben K., and Hey, John D. (2020): “Understanding preference imprecision,” Journal of Economic Surveys, 34(1), 154–174.
Bazerman, Max H., and Samuelson, William F. (1983): “I won the auction but don’t want the prize,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 27(4), 618–634.
Becker, Gordon M., DeGroot, Morris H., and Marschak, Jacob (1963): “Stochastic models of choice behavior,” Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 8(1), 41–55.
Bernasconi, Michele, and Seri, Raffaello (2016): “What are we estimating when we fit Stevens’ power law?” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 75, 137–149.
Bernoulli, Daniel (1738): “Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk,” (translated by Sommer, Louise (1954): Econometrica, 22(1), 23–36).
Bhui, Rahul (2019a): “A statistical test for the optimality of deliberative time allocation,” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 26(3), 855–867.
Bhui, Rahul (2019b): “Testing optimal timing in value-linked decision making,” Computational Brain and Behavior, 2(2), 85–94.
Blavatskyy, Pavlo R. (2008): “Stochastic utility theorem,” Journal of Mathematical Economics, 44, 1049–1056.
Blavatskyy, Pavlo R. (2011): “Probabilistic risk aversion with an arbitrary outcome set,” Economics Letters, 112(1), 34–37.
Boldrin, Michele, Christiano, Lawrence J., and Fisher, Jonas D. M. (2001): “Habit persistence, asset returns, and the business cycle,” American Economic Review, 91(1), 149–166.
Bordalo, Pedro, Gennaioli, Nicola, and Shleifer, Andrei (2012): “Salience theory of choice under risk,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(3), 1243–1285.
Brañas-Garza, Pablo, Ductor, Lorenzo, and Kovářík, Jaromír (2022): “The role of unobservable characteristics in friendship network formation,” Working paper, ArXiv:2206.13641.
Brañas-Garza, Pablo, Estepa-Mohedano, Lorenzo, Jorrat, Diego, Orozco, Victor, and Rascon-Ramirez, Ericka (2021): “To pay or not to pay: Measuring risk preferences in lab and field,” Judgment and Decision Making, 16 (5), 1290–1313.
Brañas-Garza, Pablo, García-Muñoz, Teresa, and Hernán-González, Roberto (2012): “Cognitive effort in the beauty contest game,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 83(2), 254–260.
Brañas-Garza, Pablo, Jorrat, Diego, Espín, Antonio M., and Sánchez, Angel (2023): “Paid and hypothetical time preferences are the same: Lab, field and online evidence,” Experimental Economics, 26, 412–434.
Brañas-Garza, Pablo, and Smith, John (2016): “Cognitive abilities and economic behavior,” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 64, 1–4.
Brocas, Isabelle, Carrillo, Juan D., and Tarrasó, Jorge (2018): “How long is a minute?” Games and Economic Behavior, 111, 305–322.
Bruni, Luigino, and Sugden, Robert (2007): “The road not taken: How psychology was removed from economics, and how it might be brought back,” Economic Journal, 117(516), 146–173.
Bush, Robert R., and Mosteller, Frederick (1955): Stochastic Models for Learning. John Wiley, New York.
Butler, David J. (2000): “Do non-expected utility choice patterns spring from hazy preferences? An experimental study of choice errors,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 41(3), 277–297.
Butler, David J., and Loomes, Graham C. (2007): “Imprecision as an account of the preference reversal phenomenon,” American Economic Review, 97(1), 277–297.
Cabrales, Antonio, Hernández, Penélope, and Sánchez, Angel (2020): “Robots, labor markets, and universal basic income,” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7, 185.
Camerer, Colin F., and Teck-Hua, Ho (1994): “Violations of the betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probability,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 8(2), 167–196.
Capen, Edward C., Clapp, Robert V., and Campbell, William M. (1971): “Competitive bidding in high-risk situations,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, 23(6), 641–653.
Caplin, Andrew (2012): “Choice sets as percepts,” in Neuroscience of Preference and Choice: Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms, Dolan, Raymond, and Sharot, Tali (Eds.), Academic Press, Waltham, 295–304.
Caplin, Andrew, Csaba, Dániel, Leahy, John, and Nov, Oded (2020): “Rational inattention, competitive supply, and psychometrics,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(3), 1681–1724.
Caplin, Andrew, and Dean, Mark (2015): “Revealed preference, rational inattention, and costly information acquisition,” American Economic Review, 105(7), 2183–2203.
Carpenter, Jeffrey, and Huet-Vaughn, Emiliano (2019): “Real-effort tasks,” in Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Experimental Economics, Schram, Arthur, and Ule, Aljaž (Eds.), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 368–383.
Case, Karl E., Quigley, John M., and Shiller, Robert J. (2005): “Comparing wealth effects: The stock market versus the housing market,” Advances in Macroeconomics, 5(1), Article 1.
Cerreia-Vioglio, Simone, Dillenberger, David, Ortoleva, Pietro, and Riella, Gil (2019): “Deliberately stochastic,” American Economic Review, 109(7), 2425–2445.
Churcher, B. G. (1935): “A loudness scale for industrial noise measurements,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 6(4), 216–225.
Cooper, David J., and Rege, Mari (2011): “Misery loves company: Social regret and social interaction effects in choices under risk and uncertainty,” Games and Economic Behavior, 73(1), 91–110.
Corgnet, Brice, Hernán-González, Roberto, and Kujal, Praveen (2020): “On booms that never bust: Ambiguity in experimental asset markets with bubbles,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 110, 103754.
Amicis, De, Luisa, Binenti, Silvia, Maciel Cardoso et al. (2020): “Understanding drivers when investing for impact: An experimental study,” Palgrave Communications, 6, 86.
Dean, Mark, and Neligh, Nathaniel (2023): “Experimental tests of rational inattention,” Journal of Political Economy, forthcoming.
Debreu, Gerard (1960): “Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis,” American Economic Review, 50(1), 186–188.
Dessein, Wouter, Galeotti, Andrea, and Santos, Tano (2016): “Rational inattention and organizational focus,” American Economic Review, 106(6), 1522–1536.
Dewan, Ambuj, and Neligh, Nathaniel (2020): “Estimating information cost functions in models of rational inattention,” Journal of Economic Theory, 187, 105011.
Duffy, Sean, Gussman, Steven, and Smith, John (2021): “Visual judgments of length in the economics laboratory: Are there brains in stochastic choice?” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 93, 101708.
Duffy, Sean, Hertel, Johanna, Igan, Deniz, Pinheiro, Marcelo, and Smith, John (2022): “On Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning: Another look at Kording and Wolpert (2004),” Cortex, 153, 87–96.
Duffy, Sean, and Smith, John (2020): “On the category adjustment model: Another look at Huttenlocher, Hedges, and Vevea (2000),” Mind and Society, 19(1), 163–193.
Duffy, Sean, and Smith, John (2023): “An economist and a psychologist form a line: What can imperfect perception of length tell us about stochastic choice?” Working paper, Rutgers University-Camden.
Dutilh, Gilles, and Rieskamp, Jörg (2016): “Comparing perceptual and preferential decision making,” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23(3), 723–737.
Eliaz, Kfir, and Spiegler, Ran (2011): “Consideration sets and competitive marketing,” Review of Economic Studies, 78(1), 235–262.
Engen, Trygg, and Tulunay, Ülker (1957): “Some sources of error in half-heaviness judgments,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54(3), 208–212.
Evans, Nathan J., and Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan (2020): “Evidence accumulation models: Current limitations and future directions,” Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 16(2), 73–90.
Falk, Armin, and Zimmermann, Florian (2013): “A taste for consistency and survey response behavior,” CESifo Economic Studies, 59(1), 181–193.
Falmagne, Jean-Claude (2002): Elements of Psychophysical Theory. Oxford University Press, New York.
Fechner, Gustav Theodor (1860): Elemente der Psychophysik. (Elements of psychophysics, translated 1966. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.)
Frydman, Cary, and Jin, Lawrence J. (2022): “Efficient coding and risky choice,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 137(1), 161–213.
Fudenberg, Drew, Iijima, Ryota, and Strzalecki, Tomasz (2015): “Stochastic choice and revealed perturbed utility,” Econometrica, 83(6), 2371–2409.
Fudenberg, Drew, Newey, Whitney, Strack, Philipp, and Strzalecki, Tomasz (2020): “Testing the drift-diffusion model,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(52), 33141–33148.
Fudenberg, Drew, Strack, Philipp, and Strzalecki, Tomasz (2018): “Speed, accuracy, and the optimal timing of choices,” American Economic Review, 108(12), 3651–3684.
Gabaix, Xavier, Laibson, David, Moloche, Guillermo, and Weinberg, Stephen (2006): “Costly information acquisition: Experimental analysis of a boundedly rational model,” American Economic Review, 96(4), 1043–1068.
Gescheider, George A. (1997): Psychophysics: The Fundamentals. Routledge Press, New York.
Gescheider, George A., Wright, John H., and Polak, John W. (1971): “Detection of vibrotactile signals differing in probability of occurrence,” Journal of Psychology, 78(2), 253–260.
Gill, David, and Prowse, Victoria (2012): “A structural analysis of disappointment aversion in a real effort competition,” American Economic Review, 102(1), 469–503.
Gneezy, Uri, Niederle, Muriel, and Rustichini, Aldo (2003): “Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3), 1049–1074.
Goeree, Jacob K., Holt, Charles A., and Palfrey, Thomas R. (2003): “Risk averse behavior in generalized matching pennies games,” Games and Economic Behavior, 45(1), 97–113.
Goeree, Jacob K., Holt, Charles A., and Palfrey, Thomas R. (2010): “Quantal response equilibria,” in Behavioural and Experimental Economics, Durlauf, Steven N., Blume, Lawrence E. (Eds.), New Palgrave Economics Collection, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 234–242.
Gonzalez, Richard, and George, Wu (1999): “On the shape of the probability weighting function,” Cognitive Psychology, 38(1), 129–166.
Goryunov, Maxim, and Rigos, Alexandros (2022): “Discontinuous and continuous stochastic choice and coordination in the lab,” Journal of Economic Theory, 206, 105557.
Hausman, Jerry A., and Wise, David A. (1978): “A conditional probit model for qualitative choice: Discrete decisions recognizing interdependence and heterogeneous preferences,” Econometrica, 46(2), 403–426.
Hautus, Michael J., Macmillan, Neil A., and Creelman, C. Douglas (2022): Detection Theory: A User’s Guide. Routledge, New York.
Heinemann, Frank, Nagel, Rosemarie, and Ockenfels, Peter (2009): “Measuring strategic uncertainty in coordination games,” Review of Economic Studies, 76(1), 181–221.
Heng, Joseph A., Woodford, Michael, and Polania, Rafael (2020): “Efficient sampling and noisy decisions,” eLife, 9, e54962.
Henmon, V. A. C. (1911): “The relation of the time of a judgment to its accuracy,” Psychological Review, 18(3), 186–201.
Hey, John D. (1995): “Experimental investigations of errors in decision making under risk,” European Economic Review, 39(3–4), 633–640.
Hey, John D. (2001): “Does repetition improve consistency?” Experimental Economics, 4(1), 5–54.
Hey, John D. (2005): “Why we should not be silent about noise,” Experimental Economics, 8(4), 325–345.
Hey, John D., Lotito, Gianna, and Maffioletti, Anna (2010): “The descriptive and predictive adequacy of theories of decision making under uncertainty/ambiguity,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 41(2), 81–111.
Hey, John D., and Orme, Chris (1994): “Investigating generalizations of expected utility theory using experimental data,” Econometrica, 62(6), 1291–1326.
Hildenbrand, Werner (1971): “Random preferences and equilibrium analysis,” Journal of Economic Theory, 3(4), 414–429.
Hollingworth, Harry Levi (1910): “The central tendency of judgment,” Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 7(17), 461–469.
Horan, Sean, Manzini, Paola, and Mariotti, Marco (2022): “When is coarseness not a curse? Comparative statics of the coarse random utility model,” Journal of Economic Theory, 202, 105445.
Joel, Huber, Payne, John W., and Puto, Christopher (1982): “Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: Violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis,” Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1), 90–98.
Janellen, Huttenlocher, Hedges, Larry V., and Vevea, Jack L. (2000): “Why do categories affect stimulus judgment?” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(2), 220–241.
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos (1979): “Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk,” Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292.
Kellogg, W. N. (1931): “The time of judgment in psychometric measures,” American Journal of Psychology, 43(1), 65–86.
Khaw, Mel Win, Ziang, Li, and Michael, Woodford (2021): “Cognitive imprecision and small-stakes risk aversion,” Review of Economic Studies, 88(4), 1979–2013.
Khaw, Mel Win, Stevens, Luminita, and Woodford, Michael (2017): “Discrete adjustment to a changing environment: Experimental evidence,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 91, 88–103.
Kingdom, Frederick A., and Prins, Nicolaas (2016): Psychophysics: A Practical Introduction. Elsevier Science and Technology, San Diego .
Körding, Konrad P., and Wolpert, Daniel M. (2004): “Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning,” Nature, 427(6971), 244–247.
Krishna, Vijay (2002): Auction Theory. Academic Press, San Diego.
Krueger, Lester E. (1989): “Reconciling Fechner and Stevens: Toward a unified psychophysical law,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(2), 251–267.
Laming, Donald (1986): Sensory Analysis. Academic Press, Orlando.
Lévy-Garboua, Louis, Maafi, Hela, Masclet, David, and Terracol, Antoine (2012): “Risk aversion and framing effects,” Experimental Economics, 15(1), 128–144.
Liang, Annie (2019): “Inference of preference heterogeneity from choice data,” Journal of Economic Theory, 179, 275–311.
Loomes, Graham (2005): “Modelling the stochastic component of behaviour in experiments: Some issues for the interpretation of data,” Experimental Economics, 8(4), 301–323.
Loomes, Graham, Starmer, Chris, and Sugden, Robert (1989): “Preference reversal: Information-processing effect or rational non-transitive choice?” Economic Journal, 99(395), 140–151.
Loomis, John, Peterson, George, Champ, Patricia, Brown, Thomas, and Lucero, Beatrice (1998): “Paired comparison estimates of willingness to accept versus contingent valuation estimates of willingness to pay,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 35(4), 501–515.
Jay, Lu (2016): “Random choice and private information,” Econometrica, 84(6), 1983–2027.
Luce, R. Duncan (1959): Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. Wiley, New York.
Luce, R. Duncan, and Green, David M. (1972): “A neural timing theory for response times and the psychophysics of intensity,” Psychological Review, 79(1), 14–57.
Machina, Mark J. (1985): “Stochastic choice functions generated from deterministic preferences over lotteries,” Economic Journal, 95(379), 575–594.
Maćkowiak, Bartosz, Matějka, Filip, and Wiederholt, Mirko (2023): “Rational inattention: A review,” Journal of Economic Literature, 61(1), 226–273.
Maćkowiak, Bartosz, and Wiederholt, Mirko (2009): “Optimal sticky prices under rational inattention,” American Economic Review, 99(3), 769–803.
Maćkowiak, Bartosz, and Wiederholt, Mirko (2015): “Business cycle dynamics under rational inattention,” Review of Economic Studies, 82(4), 1502–1532.
Manzini, Paola, and Mariotti, Marco (2014): “Stochastic choice and consideration sets,” Econometrica, 82(3), 1153–1176.
Andreu, Mas-Colell, Whinston, Michael D., and Green, Jerry R. (1995): Microeconomic Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Yusufcan, Masatlioglu, Daisuke, Nakajima, and Ozbay, Erkut Y. (2012): “Revealed attention,” American Economic Review, 102(5), 2183–2205.
Matějka, Filip, and McKay, Alisdair (2015): “Rational inattention to discrete choices: A new foundation for the multinomial logit model,” American Economic Review, 105(1), 272–298.
McFadden, Daniel (1974): “Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior,” in Frontiers in Econometrics, Zarembka, Paul (Ed.), Academic Press, New York, 105–142.
McFadden, Daniel (2001): “Economic choices,” American Economic Review, 91(3), 351–378.
McKelvey, Richard D., and Palfrey, Thomas R. (1995): “Quantal response equilibria for normal form games,” Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 6–38.
Mead, Walter J., Moseidjord, Asbjorn, and Sorensen, Philip E. (1983): “The rate of return earned by lessees under cash bonus bidding for OCS oil and gas leases,” Energy Journal, 4(4), 37–52.
Mondria, Jordi, and Thomas, Wu (2010): “The puzzling evolution of the home bias, information processing and financial openness,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 34(5), 875–896.
Mosteller, Frederick, and Nogee, Philip (1951): “An experimental measurement of utility,” Journal of Political Economy, 59(5), 371–404.
Munsell, Albert E. O., Sloan, Louise L., and Godlove, Isaac H. (1933): “Neutral value scales. I. Munsell neutral value scale,” Journal of the Optical Society of America, 23(11), 394–411.
Murray, David J. (1993): “A perspective for viewing the history of psychophysics,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16(1), 115–137.
Naeher, Dominik (2022): “Technology adoption under costly information processing,” International Economic Review, 63(2), 699–753.
Natenzon, Paulo (2019): “Random choice and learning,” Journal of Political Economy, 127(1), 419–457.
Navarro-Martinez, Daniel, Loomes, Graham, Isoni, Andrea, Butler, David, and Alaoui, Larbi (2018): “Boundedly rational expected utility theory,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 57(3), 199–223.
Ochs, Jack (1995): “Games with unique, mixed strategy equilibria: An experimental study,” Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 202–217.
Okunade, Albert A. (1992): “Functional forms and habit effects in the US demand for coffee,” Applied Economics, 24(11), 1203–1212.
Oud, Bastiaan, Krajbich, Ian, Miller, Kevin et al. (2016): “Irrational time allocation in decision-making,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 283(1822), 20151439.
Payne, John W., Bettman, James R., and Johnson, Eric J. (1993): The Adaptive Decision Maker, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Payzan-LeNestour, Elise, and Woodford, Michael (2022): “Outlier blindness: A neurobiological foundation for neglect of financial risk,” Journal of Financial Economics, 143(3), 1316–1343.
Pirrone, Angelo, Wen, Wen, and Sheng, Li (2018): “Single-trial dynamics explain magnitude sensitive decision making,” BMC Neuroscience, 19, 54.
Plateau, Joseph Antoine Ferdinand (1872): “Sur la mesure des sensations physiques, et sur la loi qui lie l’intensité de la cause excitante,” Bulletins de l’Academie Royale des Sciences, des Lettres, et des Beaux-Arts de Belgique, 33, 376–388.
Pleskac, Timothy J., Shuli, Yu, Hopwood, Christopher, and Liu, Taosheng (2019): “Mechanisms of deliberation during preferential choice: Perspectives from computational modeling and individual differences,” Decision, 6(1), 77–107.
Pratt, John W., Wise, David A., and Zeckhauser, Richard (1979): “Price differences in almost competitive markets,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93(2), 189–211.
Prelec, Drazen (1998): “The probability weighting function,” Econometrica, 66(3), 497–527.
Rabin, Matthew (2000): “Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: A calibration theorem,” Econometrica, 68(5), 1281–1292.
Ratcliff, Roger (1978): “A theory of memory retrieval,” Psychological Review, 85(2), 59–108.
Ratcliff, Roger (2014): “Measuring psychometric functions with the diffusion model,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(2), 870–888.
Ratcliff, Roger, and McKoon, Gail (2008): “The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks,” Neural Computation, 20(4), 873–922.
Ratcliff, Roger, and Rouder, Jeffrey N. (1998): “Modeling response times for two-choice decisions,” Psychological Science, 9(5), 347–356.
Reutskaja, Elena, Nagel, Rosemarie, Camerer, Colin F., and Rangel, Antonio (2011): “Search dynamics in consumer choice under time pressure: An eye-tracking study,” American Economic Review, 101(2), 900–926.
Rivera-Garrido, Noelia, Ramos-Sosa, M. P., Accerenzi, Michela, and Brañas-Garza, Pablo (2022): “Continuous and binary sets of responses are not the same: Evidence from the field,” Scientific Reports, 12, 14376.
Roberts, John H., and Lattin, James M. (1991): “Development and testing of a model of consideration set composition,” Journal of Marketing Research, 28(4), 429–440.
Rodríguez, Jorge, Urzúa, Sergio, and Reyes, Loreto (2016): “Heterogeneous economic returns to post-secondary degrees: Evidence from Chile,” Journal of Human Resources, 51(2), 416–460.
Rozen, Kareen (2010): “Foundations of intrinsic habit formation,” Econometrica, 78(4), 1341–1373.
Rustichini, Aldo, and Siconolfi, Paolo (2014): “Dynamic theory of preferences: Habit formation and taste for variety,” Journal of Mathematical Economics, 55, 55–68.
Salomon, Joshua A., and Murray, Christopher J. L. (2004): “A multi‐method approach to measuring health‐state valuations,” Health Economics, 13(3), 281–290.
Savage, Leonard J. (1954): The Foundations of Statistics. Wiley, New York. Reprinted in 1972 by Dover, New York.
Schram, Arthur, Brandts, Jordi, and Gërxhani, Klarita (2019): “Social-status ranking: A hidden channel to gender inequality under competition,” Experimental Economics, 22(2), 396–418.
See, Judi E., Warm, Joel S., Dember, William N., and Howe, Steven R. (1997): “Vigilance and signal detection theory: An empirical evaluation of five measures of response bias,” Human Factors, 39(1), 14–29.
Serences, John T., and Saproo, Sameer (2010): “Population response profiles in early visual cortex are biased in favor of more valuable stimuli,” Journal of Neurophysiology, 104(1), 76–87.
Shepard, Roger N. (1981): “Psychological relations and psychophysical scales: On the status of ‘direct’ psychophysical measurement,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 24(1), 21–57.
Shevlin, Blair R. K., Smith, Stephanie M., Hausfeld, Jan, and Krajbich, Ian (2022): “High-value decisions are fast and accurate, inconsistent with diminishing value sensitivity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(6), e2101508119.
Shocker, Allan D., Ben-Akiva, Moshe, Boccara, Bruno, and Nedungadi, Prakash (1991): “Consideration set influences on consumer decision-making and choice: Issues, models, and suggestions,” Marketing Letters, 2(3), 181–197.
Sims, Christopher A. (2003): “Implications of rational inattention,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(3), 665–690.
Sinn, Hans-Werner (1985): “Psychophysical laws in risk theory,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 6(2), 185–206.
Smith, Vernon L. (1976): “Experimental economics: Induced value theory,” American Economic Review, 66(2), 274–279.
Solomon, Joshua A. (2009): “The history of dipper functions,” Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71(3), 435–443.
Stevens, Luminita (2020): “Coarse pricing policies,” Review of Economic Studies, 87(1), 420–453.
Stevens, S. S. (1936): “A scale for the measurement of a psychological magnitude: Loudness,” Psychological Review, 43(5), 405–416.
Stevens, S. S. (1956): “The direct estimation of sensory magnitudes: Loudness,” American Journal of Psychology, 69(1), 1–25.
Stevens, S. S. (1957): “On the psychophysical law,” Psychological Review, 64(3), 153–181.
Stevens, S. S. (1960): “The psychophysics of sensory function,” American Scientist, 48(2), 226–253.
Stevens, S. S. (1961): “To honor Fechner and repeal his law: A power function, not a log function, describes the operating characteristic of a sensory system,” Science, 133(3446), 80–86.
Stevens, S. S. (1971): “Issues in psychophysical measurement,” Psychological Review, 78(5), 426–450.
Stevens, S. S., and Guirao, Miguelina (1962): “Loudness, reciprocality, and partition scales,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 34.9B, 1466–1471.
Stigler, George J. (1950a): “The development of utility theory. I,” Journal of Political Economy, 58(4), 307–327.
Stigler, George J. (1950b): “The development of utility theory. II,” Journal of Political Economy, 58(5), 373–396.
Summerfield, Christopher, and Tsetsos, Konstantinos (2012): “Building bridges between perceptual and economic decision-making: Neural and computational mechanisms,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 70.
Swets, John A., Tanner, Wilson P. Jr, and Birdsall, Theodore G. (1961): “Decision processes in perception,” Psychological Review, 68(5), 301–340.
Takahashi, Taiki (2011): “Psychophysics of the probability weighting function,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 390(5), 902–905.
Tanner, W. P., Swets, J. A., and Green, D. M. (1956): “Some general properties of the hearing mechanism,” University of Michigan, Electronic Defense Group, Technical Report No. 30.
Taubinsky, Dmitry, and Rees-Jones, Alex (2018): “Attention variation and welfare: Theory and evidence from a tax salience experiment,” Review of Economic Studies, 85(4), 2462–2496.
Tavares, Gabriela, Perona, Pietro, and Rangel, Antonio (2017): “The attentional drift diffusion model of simple perceptual decision-making,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, 11, 468.
Thaler, Richard (1980): “Toward a positive theory of consumer choice,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1(1), 39–60.
Thaler, Richard (1988): “Anomalies: The winner’s curse,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(1), 191–202.
Thurstone, L. L. (1927a): “A law of comparative judgment,” Psychological Review, 34(4), 273–286.
Thurstone, L. L. (1927b): “Psychophysical analysis,” American Journal of Psychology, 38(3), 368–389.
Train, Kenneth E. (2009): Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Tserenjigmid, Gerelt (2020): “On the characterization of linear habit formation,” Economic Theory, 70(1), 49–93.
Tsetsos, Konstantinos, Moran, Rani, Moreland, James et al. (2016): “Economic irrationality is optimal during noisy decision making,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(11), 3102–3107.
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel (1981): “The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice,” Science, 211(4481), 453–458.
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel (1992): “Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323.
Tversky, Amos, and Russo, J. Edward (1969): “Substitutability and similarity in binary choices,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 6(1), 1–12.
Volkmann, John (1934): “The relation of the time of judgment to the certainty of judgment,” Psychological Bulletin, 31(9), 672–673.
Wakker, Peter P. (2010): Prospect Theory: For Risk and Ambiguity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Weber, Elke (2004): “Perception matters: Psychophysics for economists,” in The Psychology of Economic Decisions: Reasons and Choices (Vol. 2), Brocas, Isabelle, and Carrillo, Juan (Eds.), Oxford University Press, New York, 163–176.
Weber, Ernst (1834): De Tactu. (The Sense of Touch, translated 1978. Academic Press, New York.)
Weber, Roberto A. (2003): “‘Learning’ with no feedback in a competitive guessing game,” Games and Economic Behavior, 44(1), 134–144.
Weil, R. S., Furl, N., Ruff, C. C. et al. (2010): “Rewarding feedback after correct visual discriminations has both general and specific influences on visual cortex,” Journal of Neurophysiology, 104(3), 1746–1757.
Wichmann, Felix A., and Jäkel, Frank (2018): “Methods in psychophysics,” Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, 5(7), 265–306.
Willemsen, Martijn C., and Johnson Eric, J. (2019): “(Re) visiting the decision factory: Observing cognition with MouselabWEB,” in A Handbook of Process Tracing Methods, Michael, Schulte-Mecklenbeck, Anton, Kuehberger, and Johnson, Joseph G. (Eds.), Routledge, New York, 76–95.
Woodford, Michael (2020): “Modeling imprecision in perception, valuation, and choice,” Annual Review of Economics, 12, 579–601.
Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. (2019): “Correlated random effects models with unbalanced panels,” Journal of Econometrics, 211(1), 137–150.
Yellott, John I. (1977): “The relationship between Luce’s choice axiom, Thurstone’s theory of comparative judgment, and the double exponential distribution,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(2), 109–144.
Yuksel, Sevgi (2022): “Specialized learning and political polarization,” International Economic Review, 63(1), 457–474.
Zauberman, Gal, Kim, B. Kyu, Malkoc, Selin A., and Bettman, James R. (2009): “Discounting time and time discounting: Subjective time perception and intertemporal preferences,” Journal of Marketing Research, 46(4), 543–556.
Zeigenfuse, Matthew D., Pleskac, Timothy J., and Liu, Taosheng (2014): “Rapid decisions from experience,” Cognition, 131(2), 181–194.
