Indispensability

A. C. Paseau; Alan Baker

doi:10.1017/9781009099042

References

Azzouni, J. (1994), Metaphysical Myths, Mathematical Practice, Cambridge University Press.

Azzouni, J. (2000), “Stipulation, Logic, and Ontological Independence,” Philosophia Mathematica 8, 225–43.

Baker, A. (2003), “Does the Existence of Mathematical Objects Make a Difference?” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81, 246–4.

Baker, A. (2005), “Are There Genuine Mathematical Explanations of Physical Phenomena?” Mind 114, 223–8.

Baker, A. (2012), “Science and Mathematics: The Scope and Limits of Mathematical Fictionalism,” Book Symposium, Metascience, 21, 269–94.

Baker, A. (2016), “Parsimony and Inference to the Best Mathematical Explanation,” Synthese, 193, 333–50.

Baker, A. (2017), “Mathematics and Explanatory Generality,” Philosophia Mathematica 25, 194–209.

Balaguer, M. (1998), Platonism and Anti-Platonism in Mathematics, Oxford University Press.

Bangu, S. (2012), The Applicability of Mathematics in Science: Indispensability and Ontology, Palgrave Macmillan.

Blanchard, O. (2002), Macroeconomics (3rd ed.), Prentice Hall.

Burgess, J. P. and Rosen, G. (1997), A Subject Without An Object, Oxford University Press.

Cheyne, C. (1998), “Existence Claims and Causality,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76, 34–47.

Colyvan, M. (2001), The Indispensability of Mathematics, Oxford University Press.

Colyvan, M. (2010), “There is No Easy Road to Nominalism,” Mind 119, 285–306.

Colyvan, M. (2019), “Indispensability Arguments in the Philosophy of Mathematics,” in Zalta, E. and U. Nodelman (principal eds.) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/.

Craver, C. (2014), “The Ontic Conception of Explanation,” in Kaiser, M., Scholz, O. R., Plenge, D., and Huttemann, A. (eds.), Explanation in the Special Sciences, Springer, 27–52.

Daly, C. and Langford, S. (2009), “Mathematical Explanation and Indispensability Arguments,” Philosophical Quarterly 59, 641–58.

Daly, C. and Liggins, D. (2011), “Deferentialism,” Philosophical Studies 156, 321–37.

Duhem, P. (1906/2007), La Théorie physique. Son objet, sa structure, Vrin.

Field, H. (1980), Science Without Numbers, Princeton University Press.

Field, H. (1989), Realism, Mathematics, and Modality, Basil Blackwell.

Field, H. (2016), Science Without Numbers (2nd ed.), Oxford University Press.

Franklin, J. (2014), An Aristotelian Realist Philosophy of Mathematics, Palgrave Macmillan.

Goles, E., Schulz, O., and Markus, M. (2001), “Prime Number Selection of Cycles in a Predator-Prey Model,” Complexity 6, 33–8.

Gould, S. (1977), “Of Bamboos, Cicadas, and the Economy of Adam Smith,” in Gould, S. (ed.) Ever Since Darwin: Reflections on Natural History, Norton.

Hellman, G. (1989), Mathematics Without Numbers: Towards a Modal-Structural Interpretation, Oxford University Press.

Hellman, G. and Shapiro, S. (2019), Mathematical Structuralism, Cambridge University Press.

Knowles, R. and Saatsi, J. (2019), “Mathematics and Explanatory Generality: Nothing but Cognitive Salience,” Erkenntnis, 86, 1119–37.

Landau, E. (1958), Elementary Number Theory, Chelsea Publishing Company.

Lange, M. (2017), Because without Cause, Oxford University Press.

Leng, M. (2010), Mathematics and Reality, Oxford University Press.

Leng, M. (2021), “Models, Structures, and the Explanatory Role of Mathematics in Empirical Science,” Synthese 199, 10415–40.

Lewis, D. (1991), Parts of Classes, Blackwell.

Liggins, D. (2008), “Quine, Putnam and the ‘Quine–Putnam’ Indispensability Argument,” Erkenntnis 68, 113–27.

Linnebo, Ø. (2017), Philosophy of Mathematics, Princeton University Press.

Maddy, P. (1992), “Indispensability and Practice,” The Journal of Philosophy 89, 275–89.

Maddy, P. (1997), Naturalism in Mathematics, Oxford University Press.

Maddy, P. (2007), Second Philosophy, Oxford University Press.

Maddy, P. (forthcoming), “Reply to Paseau,” in Kennedy, J. (ed.), On the Philosophy of Penelope Maddy:Set-theoretic Foundations and Naturalistic Methodology, Springer.

Malament, D. (1982), “Review of Science Without Numbers,” Journal of Philosophy 79, 523–34.

Marcus, R. (2014), “How Not to Enhance the Indispensability Argument,” Philosophia Mathematica 22, 345–60.

Melia, J. (2000), “Weaseling Away the Indispensability Argument,” Mind 109, 455–79.

Melia, J. (2001), “Reducing Possibilities to Language,” Analysis 69, 19–29.

Melia, J. (2002), “Response to Colyvan,” Mind 111, 75–9.

Meyer, G. (2009), “Extending Hartry Field’s Instrumental Account of Applied Mathematics to Statistical Mechanics,” Philosophia Mathematica 17, 273–312.

Molinini, D. (2016), “Evidence, Explanation and Enhanced Indispensability,” Synthese 193, 403–22.

Morrison, J. (2010), “Just How Controversial is Evidential Holism?” Synthese 173, 335–52.

Paseau, A. C. (2005), “Naturalism in Mathematics and the Authority of Philosophy,” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56, 399–418.

Paseau, A. C. (2007), “Scientific Platonism,” in Leng, M., Paseau, A. C., and Potter, M. (eds.), Mathematical Knowledge, Oxford University Press, 123–49.

Paseau, A. C. (2012), “Practitioners First,” Book Symposium on Mathematics and Reality by Leng, Mary, Metascience 21, 282–8.

Paseau, A. C. (forthcoming a), “Trumping Naturalism Revisited,” in Kennedy, J. (ed.), On the Philosophy of Penelope Maddy:Set-theoretic Foundations and Naturalistic Methodology, Springer.

Paseau, A. C. (forthcoming b), What is Mathematics About? Oxford University Press.

Pincock, C. (2012), Mathematics and Scientific Representation, Oxford University Press.

Planck, M. (1950), Scientific Autobiography and Other Papers (trans. F. Gaynor), Williams & Norgate.

Putnam, H. (1967), “Mathematics without Foundations,” The Journal of Philosophy 64, 5–22.

Putnam, H. (1971), Philosophy of Logic, Harper and Row, repr. in his Mathematics, Matter and Method: Philosophical Papers 1 (1979), Cambridge University Press, 323–57.

Putnam, H. (2012), Philosophy in an Age of Science, Caro, M. De and Macarthur, D. (eds.), Harvard University Press.

Quine, W. V. (1951), “Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” Philosophical Review 60, repr. in his Quintessence: Basic Readings from the Philosophy of W.V. Quine (2004), Gibson, R. F. Jr. (ed.), Harvard University Press, 31–53.

Quine, W. V. (1970), Philosophy of Logic, Prentice Hall.

Quine, W. V. (1981), Theories and Things, Harvard University Press.

Quine, W. V. and Goodman, N. (1947), “Steps Towards a Constructive Nominalism,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 12, 105–22.

Resnik, M. (2005), “Quine and the Web of Belief,” in Shapiro, S. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic, Oxford University Press, 412–36.

Rizza, D. (2011), “Magicicada, Mathematical Explanation and Mathematical Realism,” Erkenntnis 74, 101–14.

Saatsi, J. (2011), “The Enhanced Indispensability Argument: Representational versus Explanatory Role of Mathematics in Science,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62, 143–54.

Strevens, M. (2011), Depth: An Account of Scientific Explanation, Harvard University Press.

Strevens, M. (2020), The Knowledge Machine, Allen Lane.

Tallant, J. (2013), “Optimus Prime: Paraphrasing Prime Number Talk,” Synthese 190, 2065–83.

Urquhart, A. (1990), “The Logic of Physical Theory,” in A. Irvine, D. (ed.), Physicalism in Mathematics, Kluwer.

Vineberg, S. (2018), “Mathematical Explanation and Indispensability,” Theoria 33, 233–47.

Wetzel, L. (2009), Types and Tokens, MIT Press.

Woodward, J. (2003), Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation, Oxford University Press.

Yablo, S. (1998), “Does Ontology Rest on a Mistake?” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 72, 229–61.

Yablo, S. (2000), “Apriority and Existence,” in Boghossian, P. and Peacocke, C. (eds.), New Essays on the A Priori, Oxford University Press, 197–228.

Yablo, S. (2005), “The Myth of the Seven,” in Kalderon, M. (ed.), Fictionalism in Metaphysics, Oxford University Press, 88–115.

Yablo, S. (2012), “Explanation, Extrapolation, and Existence,” Mind 121, 1007–29.

Indispensability

This Element has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Book description

References

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Book summary page views

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

Accessibility Information