References
Ackema, Peter, and Neeleman, Ad. 2001. “Competition between syntax and morphology.” In Optimality-theoretic syntax, ed. Legendre, Géraldine, Grimshaw, Jane, and Vikner, Sten, 29–60. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ackerman, Farrell, Blevins, James P., and Malouf, Robert. 2009. “Parts and wholes: Implicative patterns in inflectional paradigms.” In Analogy in grammar: Form and acquisition, ed. Blevins, James P. and Blevins, Juliette, 54–82. Oxford University Press.
Ackerman, Farrell, and Malouf, Robert. 2011. “Paradigmatics, syntagmatics, and the agglutinative ideal.” Paper presented at Workshop on Quantitative Measures in Morphology and Morphological Development. San Diego, CA, January 15–16, 2011.
Ackerman, Farrell, and Malouf, Robert. 2013. “Morphological organization: The Low Conditional Entropy Conjecture.” Language 89(3): 429–464.
Ackerman, Farrell, and Stump, Gregory T.. 2004. “Paradigms and periphrastic expression: A study in realization-based lexicalism.” In Projecting morphology, ed. Sadler, Louisa and Spencer, Andrew, 111–158. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Akhtar, Nameera, Callanan, Maureen, Pullum, Geoffrey K., and Scholz, Barbara C.. 2004. “Learning antecedents for anaphoric one.” Cognition 93: 141–145.
Aksenčuk, Ivan (Dir.). 1977. Kak griby s goroxom voevali [How the mushrooms fought with the peas]. Sojusmul'tfil'm.
Albright, Adam. 2002a. “The identification of bases in morphological paradigms.” Ph.D. dissertation, Linguistics Department, UCLA.
Albright, Adam. 2002b. “Islands of reliability for regular morphology: Evidence from Italian.” Language 78(4): 684–709.
Albright, Adam. 2003. “A quantitative study of Spanish paradigm gaps.” In West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 22 proceedings, ed. Garding, Gina and Tsujimura, Mimu, 1–14. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Albright, Adam. 2009. “Lexical and morphological conditioning of paradigm gaps.” In Rice and Blaho (eds.), 117–164.
Albright, Adam, and Hayes, Bruce. 2002. “Modeling English past tense intuitions with minimal generalization.” In Proceedings of the sixth meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics Special Interest Group in Computational Phonology in Philadelphia, July 2002, ed. Maxwell, Michael, 58–69. Cambridge, MA: ACL.
Alegre, Maria, and Gordon, Peter. 1998. “Frequency effects and the representational status of regular inflections.” Journal of Memory and Language 40: 41–61.
Alegre, Maria, and Gordon, Peter. 1999. “Rule-based versus associate processes in derivational morphology.” Brain and Language 68(2): 347–354.
Alley, Maria, Sims, Andrea, and Brookes, Bryan. 2006. “On Russian verbal gaps and non-optimality in language.” Paper presented at the first meeting of the Slavic Linguistics Society. Bloomington, IN, September 7–10, 2006.
Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-morphous morphology. Cambridge University Press.
Anderson, Stephen R. 2008. “Phonologically conditioned allomorphy in Surmiran (Rumantsch).” Word Structure 1(2): 109–134.
Anderson, Stephen R. 2010. “Failing one's obligations: Defectiveness in Rumantsch reflexives of DĒBĒRE.” In Baerman et al. (eds.), 19–34.
Anderson, Stephen R. 2011. “Stress-conditioned allomorphy in Surmiran (Rumantsch).” In Maiden et al. (eds.), 17–35.
Andrews, Avery D. 1982. “The representation of case in Modern Icelandic.” In The mental representation of grammatical relations, ed. Bresnan, Joan, 427–503. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Andrews, Avery D. 1990. “Unification and morphological blocking.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8: 507–557.
Aristar, Anthony. 1997. “Marking and hierarchy: Types and the grammaticalization of case-markers.” Studies in Language 21(2): 313–368.
Aronoff, Mark. 1980. “The relevance of productivity in a synchronic description of word formation.” In Historical morphology, ed. Fisiak, Jacek, 71–82. The Hague: Mouton.
Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Aronoff, Mark, and Anshen, Frank. 1998. “Morphology and the lexicon: Lexicalization and productivity.” In The handbook of morphology, ed. Spencer, Andrew and Zwicky, Arnold M., 237–247. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Aski, Janice. 1995. “Verbal suppletion: An analysis of Italian, French, and Spanish to go.” Linguistics 33: 403–432.
Aslin, Richard N., and Newport, Elissa L.. 2008. “What statistical learning can and can't tell us about language acquisition.” In Infant pathways to language: Methods, models, and research disorders, ed. Colombo, John, McCardie, Peggy, and Freund, Lisa, 15–29. New York: Psychology Press.
Baayen, R. Harald, Dijkstra, Ton, and Schreuder, Robert. 1997. “Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual route model.” Journal of Memory and Language 36: 94–117.
Baayen, R. Harald, and del Prado Martín, Fermín Moscoso. 2005. “Semantic density and past-tense formation in three Germanic languages.” Language 81(3): 666–698.
Baayen, R. Harald, and Schreuder, Robert. 1999. “War and peace: Morphemes and full forms in a noninteractive activation parallel dual-route model.” Brain and Language 68(1–2): 27–32.
Babiniotis, Georgios. 1998. Lexikó tīs néas ellīnikī́s glóssas. Athens: Kentro Lexikologias.
Bachrach, Asaf, and Nevins, Andrew. 2008. “Introduction: Approaching inflectional identity.” In Inflectional identity, ed. Bachrach, Asaf and Nevins, Andrew, 1–28. Oxford University Press.
Baerman, Matthew. 2008. “Historical observations on defectiveness: The first singular non-past.” Russian Linguistics 32(1): 81–97.
Baerman, Matthew. 2011. “Defectiveness and homophony avoidance.” Journal of Linguistics 47(1): 1–29.
Baerman, Matthew, Brown, Dunstan, and Corbett, Greville. 2005. The syntax-morphology interface: A study of syncretism. Cambridge University Press.
Baerman, Matthew, and Corbett, Greville G.. 2010. “Introduction: Defectiveness: Typology and diachrony.” In Baerman et al. (eds.), 1–18.
Baerman, Matthew, Corbett, Greville G., and Brown, Dunstan, eds. 2010. Defective paradigms: Missing forms and what they tell us. London: Oxford University Press, in coordination with British Academy Press.
Bailyn, John F., and Nevins, Andrew. 2008. “Russian genitive plurals are impostors.” In Inflectional identity, ed. Bachrach, Asaf and Nevins, Andrew, 237–270. Oxford University Press.
Baker, C. L. 1978. Introduction to generative-transformational syntax. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Baker, Mark. 1985. “The Mirror Principle and morphosyntactic explanation.” Linguistic Inquiry 16(3): 373–415.
Baronian, Luc V. 2005. “North of phonology.” Ph.D. dissertation, Linguistics Department, Stanford University.
Bauer, Laurie. 2001. Morphological productivity. Cambridge University Press.
Beard, Robert. 1995. Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology: A general theory of inflection and word formation. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Benveniste, Émile. 1968. “Mutations of linguistic categories.” In Directions for historical linguistics: A symposium, ed. Lehmann, W. P. and Malkiel, Yakov, 85–95. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bergen, Benjamin K. 2004. “The psychological reality of phonaesthemes.” Language 80(2): 290–311.
Berko, Jean. 1958. “The child's learning of English morphology.” Word 14: 150–177.
Bertram, Raymond, Laine, Matti, Baayen, R. Harald, Schreuder, Robert, and Hyönä, Jukka. 2000a. “Affixal homonymy triggers full-form storage, even with inflected words, even in a morphologically rich language.” Cognition 74(2): B12–B25.
Bertram, Raymond, Schreuder, Robert, and Baayen, R. Harald. 2000b. “The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: The role of word formation type, affixal homonymy and productivity.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 26(2): 489–511.
Bickel, Balthasar, and Nichols, Johanna. 2007. “Inflectional morphology.” In Language typology and syntactic description, vol. III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, ed. Shopen, Timothy, 169–240. Cambridge University Press.
Blevins, James P. 1995. “Syncretism and paradigmatic opposition.” Linguistics and Philosophy 18(2): 113–152.
Blevins, James P. 2004. “Inflection classes and economy.” In Müller et al. (eds.), 51–95.
Blevins, James P. 2006. “Word-based morphology.” Journal of Linguistics 42(3): 531–573.
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: H. Holt and Company.
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2002. “Syncretism without paradigms: Remarks on Williams 1981, 1994.” In Booij and van Marle (eds.), 53–85.
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2008. “Paradigms (optimal and otherwise): A case for skepticism.” In Inflectional identity, ed. Bachrach, Asaf and Nevins, Andrew, 29–54. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bochner, Harry. 1993. Simplicity in generative morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Boeckx, Cedric. 2008. Bare syntax. Oxford University Press.
Bonami, Olivier. 2013. “Towards a robust assessment of implicative relations in inflectional systems.” Paper presented at Workshop on Computational Approaches to Morphological Complexity. Paris, February 22, 2013.
Bonami, Olivier, and Boyé, Gilles. 2002. “Suppletion and dependency in inflectional morphology.” In Proceedings of the eighth International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, ed. van Eynde, Frank, Hellan, Lars, and Beermann, Dorothee, 51–70. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Bonami, Olivier, and Boyé, Gilles. 2003. “Supplétion et classes flexionnelles dans la conjugaison du français.” Langages 152(Dec.): 102–126.
Bonami, Olivier, Boyé, Gilles, and Henri, Fabiola. 2011. “Measuring inflectional complexity: French and Mauritian.” Paper presented at Workshop on Quantitative Measures in Morphology and Morphological Development. San Diego, CA, January 15–16, 2011.
Bonami, Olivier, and Samvelian, Pollet. 2009. “Inflectional periphrasis in Persian.” In Proceedings of the sixteenth International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, ed. Müller, Stefan, 26–46. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Bonami, Olivier, and Webelhuth, Gert. 2013. “The phrase-structural diversity of periphrasis: A lexicalist account.” In Periphrasis: The role of syntax and morphology in paradigms, ed. Chumakina, Marina and Corbett, Greville G., 141–167. Oxford University Press and British Academy.
Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction morphology. Oxford University Press.
Booij, Geert, Lehmann, Christian, and Mugdan, Joachim, eds. 2000. Morphologie: ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung / Morphology: An international handbook on inflection and word-formation. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Booij, Geert, and van Marle, Jaap, eds. 2002. Yearbook of morphology 2001. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Börjars, Kersti, Vincent, Nigel, and Chapman, Carol. 1997. “Paradigms, periphrases and pronominal inflection: A feature-based account.” In Yearbook of morphology 1996, ed. Booij, Geert and van Marle, Jaap, 155–180. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Boyé, Gilles. 2000. “Problèmes de morpho-phonologie verbale en français, en espagnol et en italien.” Ph.D. dissertation, U.F.R. de Linguistique, Université Paris VII – Denis Diderot, Paris.
Boyé, Gilles, and Hofherr, Patricia Cabredo. 2006. “The structure of allomorphy in Spanish verbal inflection.” Cuadernos de Lingüística del Instituto Universitario Ortega y Gasset 13: 9–24.
Boyé, Gilles, and Hofherr, Patricia Cabredo. 2010. “Defectiveness as stem suppletion in French and Spanish verbs.” In Baerman et al. (eds.), 35–52.
Bresnan, Joan. 2001. “Explaining morphosyntactic competition.” In The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, ed. Baltin, Mark and Collins, Chris, 11–44. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Broadbent, Judith M. 2009. “The *amn't gap: The view from West Yorkshire.” Journal of Linguistics 45(2): 251–284.
Brown, Dunstan. 2007. “Peripheral functions and overdifferentiation: The Russian second locative.” Russian Linguistics 31(1): 61–76.
Brown, Dunstan, Chumakina, Marina, Corbett, Greville, Popova, Gergana, and Spencer, Andrew. 2012. “Defining ‘periphrasis’: Key notions.” Morphology 22(2): 233–275.
Brown, Dunstan, Corbett, Greville, Fraser, Norman, Hippisley, Andrew, and Timberlake, Alan. 1996. “Russian noun stress and Network Morphology.” Linguistics 34: 53–107.
Brown, Dunstan, and Hippisley, Andrew. 2012. Network morphology: A defaults-based theory of word structure. Cambridge University Press.
Burani, Cristina, Barca, Laura, and Ellis, Andrew W.. 2006. “Orthographic complexity and word naming in Italian: Some words are more transparent than others.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13(2): 346–352.
Burani, Cristina, and Thornton, Anna M.. 2003. “The interplay of root, suffix and whole-word frequency in processing derived words.” In Morphological structure in language processing, ed. Baayen, R. Harald and Schreuder, Robert, 157–207. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Butterworth, Brian. 1983. “Lexical representation.” In Language production, vol. II: Development, writing and other language processes, ed. Butterworth, Brian, 257–294. London: Academic Press.
Bybee, Joan, and Moder, Carol. 1983. “Morphological classes as natural categories.” Language 59(2): 251–270.
Bybee, Joan, and Newman, Jean E.. 1995. “Are stem changes as natural as affixes?” Linguistics 33(4): 633–654.
Bybee, Joan, and Slobin, Dan. 1982. “Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense.” Language 58(2): 265–289.
Calderone, Basilio, and Celata, Chiara. 2011. “Paradigm-aware morphological categorizations.” Lingue e Linguaggio 10(2): 183–207.
Cameron-Faulkner, Thea, and Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 2000. “Stem alternants as morphological signata: Evidence from blur avoidance in Polish nouns.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18(4): 813–835.
Caramazza, Alfonso, Laudanna, Alessandro, and Romani, Christina. 1988. “Lexical access and inflectional morphology.” Cognition 28(3): 297–332.
Carroll, John M., Bever, Thomas G., and Pollack, Chava R.. 1981. “The non-uniqueness of linguistic intuitions.” Language 57(2): 368–383.
Carstairs, Andrew. 1983. “Paradigm economy.” Journal of Linguistics 19(1): 115–125.
Carstairs, Andrew. 1987. Allomorphy in inflexion. London: Croom Helm.
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 1994. “Inflection classes, gender and the principle of contrast.” Language 70(4): 737–788.
Chomsky, Noam. 1980. Rules and representations. New York: Columbia University Press.
Chouinard, Michelle M., and Clark, Eve V.. 2003. “Adult reformulations of child errors as negative evidence.” Journal of Child Language 30(3): 637–669.
Chumakina, Marina. 2011. “Nominal periphrasis: A canonical approach.” Studies in Language 35(2): 247–274.
Chumakina, Marina, Kibort, Anna, and Corbett, Greville G.. 2007. “Determining a language's feature inventory: Person in Archi.” In Endangered languages [special issue of Linguistische Berichte], ed. Austin, Peter K. and Simpson, Andrew, 143–172. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.
Clahsen, Harald, Eisenbeiss, Sonja, and Sonnenstuhl-Henning, Ingrid. 1997. “Morphological structure and the processing of inflected words.” Theoretical Linguistics 23(3): 201–249.
Comrie, Bernard. 1986. “On delimiting cases.” In Case in Slavic, ed. Brecht, Richard D. and Levine, James S., 86–106. Columbus, OH: Slavica.
Comrie, Bernard. 1991. “Form and function in identifying cases.” In Paradigms: The economy of inflection, ed. Plank, Frans, 41–55. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Corbett, Greville G. 2000. Number. Cambridge University Press.
Corbett, Greville G. 2008. “Determining morphosyntactic feature values: The case of case.” In Case and grammatical relations: Studies in honor of Bernard Comrie, ed. Corbett, Greville G. and Noonan, Michael, 1–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Corbett, Greville G. 2010. “Features: Essential notions.” In Features: Perspectives on a key notion in linguistics, ed. Kibort, Anna and Corbett, Greville G., 17–36. Oxford University Press.
Corbett, Greville G. 2011. “The penumbra of morphosyntactic feature systems.” Morphology 21(2): 445–480.
Corbett, Greville G. 2012. “Canonical morphosyntactic features.” In Canonical morphology and syntax, ed. Brown, Dunstan, Corbett, Greville G., and Chumakina, Marina, 48–65. Oxford University Press.
Corbett, Greville G., Hippisley, Andrew, Brown, Dunstan, and Marriott, Paul. 2001. “Frequency, regularity and the paradigm: A perspective from Russian on a complex relation.” In Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, ed. Bybee, Joan and Hopper, Paul J., 201–226. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cover, Thomas M., and Thomas, Joy A.. 2006. Elements of information theory. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.
Daland, Robert, Sims, Andrea D., and Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2007. “Much ado about nothing: A social network model of Russian paradigmatic gaps.” In Proceedings of the forty-fifth annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics in Prague, Czech Republic, June 24th–29th, 2007, ed. Zaenen, Annie and van den Bosch, Antal, 936–943. Prague: ACL.
Daugherty, Kim G., and Seidenberg, Mark S.. 1994. “Beyond rules and exceptions: A connectionist approach to inflectional morphology.” In The reality of linguistic rules, ed. Lima, Susan D., Corrigan, Roberta L., and Iverson, Gregory, 353–388. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
De Jong, Nivja H., Schreuder, Robert, and Baayen, R. Harald. 2000. “The morphological family size effect and morphology.” Language and Cognitive Processes 15(4–5): 329–365.
Demetras, M. J., Post, Kathryn Nolan, and Snow, Catherine E.. 1986. “Feedback to first language learners: The role of repetitions and clarification questions.” Journal of Child Language 13(2): 275–292.
Dench, Alan Charles. 1995. Martuthunira: A language of the Pilbara region of Western Australia. Canberra: Australian National University.
di Sciullo, Anna Maria, and Williams, Edwin. 1987. On the definition of word. Cambridge University Press.
Dixon, R. M. W. 1977. “Where have all the adjectives gone?” Studies in Language 1(1): 19–80.
Egenes, Thomas. 1989. Introduction to Sanskrit, vol. II. San Diego, CA: Point Loma.
Elman, Jeffrey L., Bates, Elizabeth A., Johnson, Mark, Karmiloff-Smith, Annette, Parisi, Domenico, and Plunkett, Kim. 1996. Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Embick, David. 2000. “Features, syntax, and categories in the Latin perfect.” Linguistic Inquiry 31(2): 185–230.
Embick, David. 2007. “Blocking effects and analytic/synthetic alternations.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25(1): 1–37.
Evans, Nicholas, and Levinson, Stephen C.. 2009a. “The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32: 429–448.
Evans, Nicholas, and Levinson, Stephen C.. 2009b. “With diversity in mind: Freeing the language sciences from Universal Grammar.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32(5): 472–484.
Fanselow, Gisbert, and Féry, Caroline. 2002. “Ineffability in grammar.” In Resolving conflicts in grammars: Optimality theory in syntax, morphology and phonology, ed. Fanselow, Gisbert and Féry, Caroline, 265–307. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.
Feldman, Laurie Beth, Barac-Cikoja, Dragana, and Kostić, Aleksandar. 2002. “Semantic aspects of morphological processing: Transparency effects in Serbian.” Memory and Cognition 30(4): 629–636.
Feldman, Laurie Beth, and Pastizzo, Matthew John. 2003. “Morphological facilitation: The role of semantic transparency and family size.” In Morphological structure in language processing, ed. Baayen, R. Harald and Schreuder, Robert, 233–258. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Fennell, Trevor G., and Gelsen, Henry. 1980. A grammar of modern Latvian. 3 vols. The Hague: Mouton.
Finkel, Raphael, and Stump, Gregory T.. 2007. “Principal parts and morphological typology.” Morphology 17(1): 39–75.
Fodor, Janet D. 1972. “Beware.” Linguistic Inquiry 3(4): 528–535.
Foraker, Stephani, Regier, Terry, Khetarpal, Naveen, Perfors, Amy, and Tenenbaum, Joshua B.. 2009. “Indirect evidence and the poverty of the stimulus: The case of anaphoric one.” Cognitive Science 33(2): 287–300.
Frampton, John. 2001. “The amn't gap, ineffability, and anomalous aren't: Against morphosyntactic competition.” In CLS 37: Papers from the thirty-seventh regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, vol. II, ed. Andronis, Mary, Ball, Christopher, Elston, Heidi, and Neuvel, Sylvain, 399–412. Chicago: CLS.
Gazdar, Gerald, Pullum, Geoffrey K., and Sag, Ivan A.. 1982. “Auxiliaries and related phenomena in a restrictive theory of grammar.” Language 58: 591–638.
Geist, Ljudmila. 2007. “Predication and equation in copular sentences: Russian vs. English.” In Existence: Semantics and syntax, ed. Comorovski, Ileana and von Heusinger, Klaus, 79–105. Dordrecht: Springer.
Givón, T. 1971. “Historical syntax and synchronic morphology: An archaeologist's field trip.” In Papers from the seventh regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 394–415. Chicago: CLS.
Goddard, Cliff. 1982. “Case systems and case marking in Australian languages: A new interpretation.” Australian Journal of Linguistics 2: 167–196.
Goldsmith, John, and O'Brien, Jeremy. 2006. “Learning inflectional classes.” Language Learning and Development 2(4): 219–250.
Gómez, Rebecca L. 2002. “Variability and detection of invariant structure.” Psychological Science 13(5): 431–436.
Gonda, J. 1956. “A critical survey of the publications on the periphrastic future in Sanskrit.” Lingua 6: 158–179.
Groos, Anneke, and van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1981. “Matching effect in free relatives: A parameter of core grammar.” In The theory of markedness in generative grammar: Proceedings of the 1979 GLOW conference, ed. Belletti, Adriana, Brandi, Luciana, and Rizzi, Luigi, 171–216. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superioredi Pisa.
Guimerà, Roger, Uzzi, Brian, Spiro, Jarrett, and Amaral, Luís A. N.. 2005. “Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance.” Science 308: 697–702.
Halle, Morris. 1973. “Prolegomena to a theory of word formation.” Linguistic Inquiry 4: 3–16.
Hansson, Gunnar Olafur. 1999. “‘When in doubt…’: Intraparadigmatic dependencies and gaps in Icelandic.” In NELS 29: Proceedings of the twenty-ninth meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society, ed. Tamanji, Pius, Hirotani, Masako, and Hall, Nancy, 105–119. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications, The University of Massachusetts.
Hare, Mary, and Elman, Jeffrey. 1995. “Learning and morphological change.” Cognition 56: 61–98.
Hare, Mary, Elman, Jeffrey L., and Daugherty, Kim G.. 1995. “Default generalisation in connectionist networks.” Language and Cognitive Processes 10(6): 601–630.
Hargus, Sharon. 2007. Witsuwit'en grammar: Phonetics, phonology, morphology. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Harris, Alice C. 2008. “On the explanation of typologically unusual structures.” In Linguistic universals and language change, ed. Good, Jeff, 54–76. Oxford University Press.
Harris, Alice C., and Campbell, Lyle. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Hippisley, Andrew, Chumakina, Marina, Corbett, Greville, and Brown, Dunstan. 2004. “Suppletion: Frequency, categories and distribution of stems.” Studies in Language 28(2): 387–418.
Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy, Treiman, Rebecca, and Schneiderman, Maita. 1984. “Brown & Hanlon revisited: Mother's sensitivity to ungrammatical forms.” Journal of Child Language 11: 81–88.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2001. “Word classes and parts of speech.” In International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences, ed. Baltes, Paul B. and Smelser, Neil J., 16538–16545. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Haspelmath, Martin, and Sims, Andrea D.. 2010. Understanding morphology, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.
Hawkins, Peter. 1979. “Greek diglossia and variation theory.” General Linguistics 19(4): 169–187.
Hay, Jennifer. 2003. Causes and consequences of word structure. New York: Routledge.
Hay, Jennifer, and Baayen, R. Harald. 2002. “Parsing and productivity.” In Booij and van Marle (eds.), 203–235.
Hetzron, Robert. 1975. “Where the grammar fails.” Language 51: 859–872.
Hewitt, B. G. 1995. Georgian: A structural reference grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hippisley, Andrew, Chumakina, Marina, Corbett, Greville, and Brown, Dunstan. 2004. “Suppletion: Frequency, categories and distribution of stems.” Studies in Language 28(2): 387–418.
Hockett, Charles F. 1954. “Two models of grammatical description.” Word 10: 210–234.
Holton, David, Mackridge, Peter A., and Philippaki-Warburton, Irene. 1997. Greek: A comprehensive grammar of the modern language. London: Routledge.
Horrocks, Geoffrey. 1997. Greek: A history of the language and its speakers. London: Longman.
Hudson, Richard. 2000. “*I amn't.” Language 76(2): 297–323.
Inkelas, Sharon, and Orgun, Cemil Orhan. 1995. “Level ordering and economy in the lexical phonology of Turkish.” Language 71(4): 763–793.
Ito, Junko, and Hankamer, Jorge. 1989. “Notes on monosyllabism in Turkish.” Phonology at Santa Cruz 1: 61–69.
Jakobson, Roman. 1984[1939]. “Contributions to the general theory of case: General meanings of the Russian cases.” In Russian and Slavic grammar: Studies 1931–1981, ed. Waugh, Linda and Halle, Morris, 59–104. Berlin: Mouton.
Jakobson, Roman. 1984[1958]. “Morphological observations on Slavic declension (the structure of Russian case forms).” In Russian and Slavic grammar: Studies 1931–1981, ed. Waugh, Linda and Halle, Morris, 105–133. Berlin: Mouton Publishers.
Jamieson, Carole Ann. 1982. “Conflated subsystems marking person and aspect in Chiquihuitlán Mazatec verb.” International Journal of American Linguistics 48(2): 139–167.
Janda, Laura. 1996. Back from the brink: A study of how relic forms in languages serve as source material for analogical extension. Munich: LINCOM Europa.
Janda, Richard D. 1982. “On limiting the form of morphological rules: German umlaut, diacritics, and the ‘cluster constraint’.” Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society 12: 140–152.
Janda, Richard D. 1983. “‘Morphemes’ aren't something that grows on trees: Morphology as more the phonology than the syntax of words.” In Proceedings of the nineteenth annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: Papers from the parasession on the interplay of phonology, morphology, and syntax, ed. Richardson, John F., Marks, Mitchell, and Chukerman, Amy, 79–95. Chicago: CLS.
Janda, Richard D. 1984. “Why morphological metathesis rules are rare: On the possibility of historical explanation in linguistics.” Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 10: 87–103.
Janda, Richard D. 2003. “‘Phonologization’ as the start of dephoneticization – or, on sound change and its aftermath: Of extension, generalization, lexicalization, and morphologization.” In The handbook of historical linguistics, ed. Joseph, Brian D. and Janda, Richard D., 401–422. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Janda, Richard D., and Joseph, Brian D.. 1999. “The Modern Greek negator μη(ν)(-) as a morphological constellation.” In Greek linguistics: Proceedings of the third international conference on Greek linguistics, ed. Babiniotis, G., 341–351. Athens: Elinika Gramata.
Jannaris, Antonius N. 1987. An historical Greek grammar chiefly of the Attic dialect, as written and spoken from classical antiquity down to the present time, founded upon the ancient texts, inscriptions, papyri and present popular Greek. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.
Järvikivi, Juhani, Bertram, Raymond, and Niemi, Jussi. 2006. “Affixal salience and the processing of derivational morphology: The role of suffix allomorphy.” Language and Cognitive Processes 21(4): 394–431.
Jelinek, Eloise, and Demers, Richard A.. 1994. “Predicates and pronominal arguments in Straits Salish.” Language 70(4): 697–736.
Jescheniak, Jorg D., and Levelt, Willem J. M.. 1994. “Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 20(4): 824–843.
Johansson, Christer. 1999. “Learning what cannot be by failing expectations.” Nordic Journal of Linguistics 22(1): 61–76.
Jörg, Christine. 1989. Isländische Konjugationstabellen / Icelandic conjugation tables / Tableaux de conjugaison islandaise / Beygingatöflur íslenskra sagna. Hamburg: H. Buske.
Joseph, Brian D. 1983. The synchrony and diachrony of the Balkan infinitive: A study in areal, general, and historical linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
Joseph, Brian D. 1987. “Greek.” In The world's major languages, ed. Comrie, Bernard, 410–439. London: Croom Helm.
Joseph, Brian D. 1997. “How general are our generalizations? What speakers actually know and what they actually do.” In ESCOL '96: Proceedings of the thirteenth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, ed. Green, Anthony D. and Motopanyane, Virginia, 148–160. Ithaca, NY: Cascadilla Press.
Joseph, Brian D. 2003. “Morphologization from syntax.” In Handbook of historical linguistics, ed. Joseph, Brian D. and Janda, Richard D., 472–492. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Joseph, Brian D. 2011. “A localistic approach to universals and variation.” In Linguistic universals and language variation, ed. Siemund, Peter, 394–414. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Joseph, Brian D., and Janda, Richard D.. 1988. “The how and why of diachronic morphologization and demorphologization.” In Theoretical morphology: Approaches in modern linguistics, ed. Hammond, Michael and Noonan, Michael, 193–210. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Joseph, Brian D., and Philippaki-Warburton, Irene. 1987. Modern Greek. London: Croom Helm.
Juge, Matthew. 1999. “On the rise of suppletion in verbal paradigms.” Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 25(1): 183–194.
Juge, Matthew. 2013. “Dynamic defectiveness and the development of suppletion.” Paper presented at Societas Linguistica Europaea. Split, Croatia, September 18–21, 2013.
Kalnača, Andra, and Lokmane, Ilze. 2010. “Defective paradigms of reflexive nouns and participles in Latvian.” In Baerman et al. (eds.), 53–67.
Karlsson, Fred. 2000. “Defectivity.” In Booij et al. (eds.), 647–654.
Katz, Leonard, Rexer, Karl, and Lukatela, Georgije. 2004. “The processing of inflected words.” Psychological Research 53(1): 25–32.
Kibort, Anna. 2010. “Toward a typology of grammatical features.” In Features: Perspectives on a key notion in linguistics, ed. Kibort, Anna and Corbett, Greville G., 64–106. Oxford University Press.
Kibrik, Aleksandr E. 1998. “Archi.” In The handbook of morphology, ed. Spencer, Andrew and Zwicky, Arnold M., 455–476. Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
Kiefer, Ferenc. 2000. “Regularity.” In Booij et al. (eds.), 296–302.
Kimball, Geoffrey. 1991. Koasati grammar. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, in cooperation with the American Indian Studies Research Institute, Indiana University.
Kiparsky, Paul. 2001. “Structural case in Finnish.” Lingua 111: 315–376.
Kiparsky, Paul. 2005. “Blocking and periphrasis in inflectional paradigms.” In Yearbook of morphology 2004, ed. Booij, Geert and van Marle, Jaap, 113–135. Dordrecht: Springer.
Klausenburger, Jurgen. 1976. “(De)morphologization in Latin.” Lingua 40: 305–320.
Kostić, Aleksandar. 1991. “Informational approach to the processing of inflected morphology: Standard data reconsidered.” Psychological Research 53(1): 62–70.
Kostić, Aleksandar, Marković, Tanja, and Baucal, Aleksandar. 2003. “Inflectional morphology and word meaning: Orthogonal or co-implicative cognitive domains?” In Morphological structure in language processing, ed. Baayen, R. Harald and Schreuder, Robert, 1–43. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1977. “Syntactic reanalysis.” In Mechanisms of syntactic change, ed. Li, Charles N., 57–139. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Lass, Roger. 1990. “How to do things with junk: Exaptation in language evolution.” Journal of Linguistics 26: 79–102.
Levelt, Willem J. M., Roelofs, Ardi, and Meyer, Antje S.. 1999. “A theory of lexical access in speech production.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22(1): 1–38.
Lewis, M. Paul, Simons, Gary F., and Fennig, Charles D.. 2013. Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 17th edn. Dallas, TX: SIL International. Available at www.ethnologue.com (accessed September 1, 2013).
Lexikó tīs koinī́s neoellīnikī́s. 1998. Thessaloniki: Triantafillidis Institute, Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis.
Lidz, Jeffrey, and Waxman, Sandra. 2004. “Reaffirming the poverty of the stimulus argument: A reply to the replies.” Cognition 93: 157–165.
Lidz, Jeffrey, Waxman, Sandra, and Freedman, Jennifer. 2003. “What infants know about syntax but couldn't have learned: Experimental evidence for syntactic structure at 18-months.” Cognition 89: B65–B73.
Lieber, Rochelle. 1980. On the organization of the lexicon. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Luce, Paul A. 1986. Neighborhoods of words in the mental lexicon: Research on speech perception technical report No. 6. Bloomington: Speech Research Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Indiana University.
Luce, Paul A., and Pisoni, David B.. 1998. “Recognizing spoken words: The Neighborhood Activation Model.” Ear and Hearing 19(1): 1–38.
Lukács, Ágnes, Rebrus, Péter, and Törkenczy, Miklós. 2010. “Paradigmatic space and defectiveness in Hungarian: Description and experimental study.” In Baerman et al. (eds.), 85–102.
Lunt, Horace G. 2001. Old Church Slavonic grammar, 7th rev. edn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Macdonell, Arthur Anthony. 1910. Vedic grammar (2000 reprint). New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.
MacWhinney, Brian, Leinbach, Jared, Taraban, Roman, and McDonald, Janet. 1989. “Language learning: Cues or rules?” Journal of Memory and Language 28(3): 255–287.
Maiden, Martin. 2004. “When lexemes become allomorphs: On the genesis of suppletion.” Folia Linguistica 38(3–4): 227–256.
Maiden, Martin. 2005. “Morphological autonomy and diachrony.” In Yearbook of morphology 2004, ed. Booij, Geert and van Marle, Jaap, 137–175. Dordrecht: Springer.
Maiden, Martin. 2009. “From pure phonology to pure morphology: The reshaping of the Romance verb.” Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes 38: 45–82.
Maiden, Martin. 2011. “Morphomes and ʻstress-conditioned allomorphyʼ in Romansh.” In Maiden et al. (eds.), 36–50.
Maiden, Martin, and O'Neill, Paul. 2010. “On morphomic defectiveness: Evidence from the Romance languages of the Iberian Peninsula.” In Baerman et al. (eds.), 103–124.
Maiden, Martin, Smith, John Charles, Goldbach, Maria, and Hinzelin, Marc-Olivier, eds. 2011. Morphological autonomy: Perspectives from Romance inflectional morphology. Oxford University Press.
Mailhammer, Robert. 2007. “Islands of resilience: The history of the German strong verbs from a systemic point of view.” Morphology 17(1): 77–108.
Maling, Joan. 2001. “Dative: The heterogeneity of the mapping among morphological case, grammatical functions, and thematic roles.” Lingua 111(4–7): 419–464.
Matthews, P. H. 1972. Inflectional morphology: A theoretical study based on aspects of Latin verb conjugation. Cambridge University Press.
Maye, Jessica, Werker, Janet, and Gerken, LouAnn. 2002. “Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination.” Cognition 82(3): B101–B111.
McCarthy, John J., and Wolf, Matthew. 2005. “Less than zero: Correspondence and the null output.” Ms. University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available on Rutgers Optimality Archive (ROA), 722, http://roa.rutgers.edu/article/view/732 (accessed August 21, 2014).
McClendon, Sally. 1977. A grammar of Eastern Pomo. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Mel'čuk, Igor A. 1986. “Toward a definition of case.” In Case in Slavic, ed. Brecht, Richard D and Levine, James S., 35–85. Columbus, OH: Slavica.
Milin, Petar, Kuperman, Victor, Kostić, Aleksandar, and Baayen, R. Harald. 2009. “Words and paradigms bit by bit: An information-theoretic approach to the processing of inflection and derivation.” In Analogy in grammar: Form and acquisition, ed. Blevins, James P. and Blevins, Juliette, 214–252. Oxford University Press.
Milne, A. A. 1965. Vinni-Pux i vse-vse-vse [Russian translation of The world of Pooh]. Trans.Zaxoder, Boris. Moskva: Detskaja literatura.
Mithun, Marianne. 2010. “The search for regularity in irregularity: Defectiveness and its implications for our knowledge of words.” In Baerman et al. (eds.), 125–149.
Morin, Yves-Charles. 1987. “Remarques sur l'organisation de la flexion des verbes français.” ITL: Review of Applied Linguistics 77–78: 13–91.
del Prado Martín, Moscoso, Fermín, Aleksandar Kostić, and Baayen, R. Harald. 2004. “Putting the bits together: An information theoretical perspective on morphological processing.” Cognition 94: 1–18.
Müller, Gereon. 2004. “On decomposing inflection class features: Syncretism in Russian noun inflection.” In Müller et al. (eds.), 189–227.
Müller, Gereon. 2007. “Notes on paradigm economy.” Morphology 17(1): 1–38.
Müller, Gereon. 2011. “Syncretism without underspecification: The role of leading forms.” Word Structure 4(1): 53–103.
Müller, Gereon, Gunkel, Lutz, and Zifonun, Gisela, eds. 2004. Explorations in nominal inflection. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Munro, Pamela. 2005. “Chickasaw.” In Native languages of the Southeastern United States ed. Hardy, Heather K. and Scancarelli, Janine, 114–156. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Munro, Pamela, and Gordon, Lynn. 1982. “Syntactic relations in Western Muskogean: A typological perspective.” Language 58(1): 81–115.
Nau, Nicole. 1998. Latvian. München: Lincom Europa.
Newmark, Leonard, Hubbard, Philip, and Prifti, Peter R.. 1982. Standard Albanian: A reference grammar for students. Stanford University Press.
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1998. Language form and language function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Niswander, Elizabeth, Pollatsek, Alexander, and Rayner, Keith. 2000. “The processing of derived and inflected suffixed words during reading.” Language and Cognitive Processes 15(4–5): 389–420.
Noyer, Rolf. 1998. “Impoverishment theory and morphosyntactic markedness.” In Morphology and its relation to phonology and syntax, ed. Lapointe, Steven G., Brentari, Diane K., and Farrell, Patrick M., 264–285. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Nübling, Damaris. 2011. “How do exceptions arise? On different paths to morphological irregularity.” In Expecting the unexpected: Exceptions in grammar, ed. Simon, Horst J. and Wiese, Heike, 149–172. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Orgun, Cemil Orhan, and Sprouse, Ronald L.. 1999. “From MPARSE to CONTROL: Deriving ungrammaticality.” Phonology 16: 191–224.
Oxford English Dictionary online. Oxford University Press. Available at www.oed.com.
Pearl, Lisa, and Goldwater, Sharon. Forthcoming. “Statistical learning, inductive bias, and Bayesian inference in language acquisition.” In Oxford handbook of developmental linguistics, ed. Jeffrey Lidz. Oxford University Press.
Peperkamp, Sharon, Calvez, Rozenn Le, Nadal, Jean-Pierre, and Dupoux, Emmanuel. 2006. “The acquisition of allophonic rules: Statistical learning with linguistic constraints.” Cognition 101(3): B31–B41.
Perfors, Amy, Tenenbaum, Joshua B., and Regier, Terry. 2011. “The learnability of abstract syntactic principles.” Cognition 118: 306–338.
Perlmutter, David, and Moore, John. 2002. “Language-internal explanation: The distribution of Russian impersonals.” Language 78(4): 619–650.
Pertsova, Katya. 2005. “How lexical conservatism can lead to paradigm gaps.” UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 11: 13–38.
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2012. “The dynamic lexicon.” In The Oxford handbook of laboratory phonology, ed. Cohn, Abigail C., Fougeron, Cécile, and Huffman, Marie K., 173–183. Oxford University Press.
Pinker, Steven. 1991. “Rules of language.” Science 253(5019): 530–535.
Pinker, Steven, and Prince, Alan. 1988. “On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition.” Cognition 28(1): 73–193.
Plag, Ingo, and Baayen, R. Harald. 2009. “Suffix ordering and morphological processing.” Language 85(1): 109–152.
Plank, Frans. 1994. “Inflection and derivation.” In The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, vol. III, ed. Asher, R. E., 1671–1678. Oxford: Pergamon.
Plaut, David C., and Gonnerman, Laura M.. 2000. “Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing?” Language and Cognitive Processes 15(4–5): 445–485.
Plunkett, Kim, and Marchman, Virginia. 1991. “U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multi-layered perceptron: Implications for child language acquisition.” Cognition 38: 43–102.
Pollard, Carl, and Sag, Ivan. 1994. Head-driven phrase structure grammar. University of Chicago Press.
Poser, William J. 1992. “Blocking of phrasal constructions by lexical items.” In Lexical matters, ed. Sag, Ivan A. and Szabolcsi, Anna, 111–130. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Prasada, Sandeep, and Pinker, Steven. 1993. “Generalisation of regular and irregular morphological patterns.” Language and Cognitive Processes 8(1): 1–56.
Prince, Alan, and Smolensky, Paul. 2002[1993]. “Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar.” Ms. Available on Rutgers Optimality Archive (ROA 537-0802), http://roa.rutgers.edu/article/view/537 (accessed August 12, 2014).
Pullum, Geoffrey K., and Scholz, Barbara C.. 2002. “Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments.” The Linguistic Review 19(1–2): 9–50.
Pullum, Geoffrey K., and Zwicky, Arnold M.. 1986. “Phonological resolution of syntactic feature conflict.” Language 62(4): 751–773.
Ralli, Angela. 1994. “Feature representations and feature-passing operations in Greek nominal inflection.” In Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium on English and Greek Linguistics, 19–46. English Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
Ralli, Angela. 2002. “The role of morphology in gender determination: Evidence from Modern Greek.” Linguistics 40(3): 519–551.
Raveh, Michal. 2002. “The contribution of frequency and semantic similarity to morphological processing.” Brain and Language 81(1–3): 312–325.
Reali, Florencia, and Christiansen, Morten H.. 2005. “Uncovering the richness of the stimulus: Structure dependence and indirect statistical evidence.” Cognitive Science 29(6): 1007–1028.
Rebuschat, Patrick, and Williams, John N.. 2011. Statistical learning and language acquisition. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Regier, Terry, and Gahl, Susanne. 2004. “Learning the unlearnable: The role of missing evidence.” Cognition 93: 147–155.
Rice, Curt. 2003. “Dialectal variation in Norwegian imperatives.” Nordlyd 31: 372–384.
Rice, Curt. 2005. “Optimal gaps in optimal paradigms.” Catalan Journal of Linguistics 4(1): 155–170.
Rice, Curt. 2007. “Gaps and repairs at the phonology–morphology interface.” Journal of Linguistics 43(1): 197–221.
Rice, Curt, and Blaho, Sylvia, eds. 2009. Modeling ungrammaticality in Optimality Theory. London: Equinox Publishing.
Robins, Robert H. 2001[1959]. “In defense of WP.” Transactions of the Philological Society 99: 1–36.
Rounds, Carol. 2001. Hungarian: An essential grammar. London: Routledge.
Rueckl, Jay G., and Raveh, Michal. 1999. “The influence of morphological regularities on the dynamics of a connectionist network.” Brain and Language 68: 110–117.
Rumelhart, David E., and McClelland, James L.. 1986. “On learning the past tenses of English verbs.” In Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. II: Psychological and biological models, ed. McClelland, James L., Rumelhart, David E., and PDP Research Group, 216–271. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rumelhart, David E., McClelland, James L., and PDP Research Group, eds. 1986. Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, 2 vols. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sadler, Louisa, and Spencer, Andrew. 2000. “Syntax as an exponent of morphological features.” In Yearbook of morphology 2000, ed. Booij, Geert and van Marle, Jaap, 71–96. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Saffran, Jenny R., Aslin, Richard N., and Newport, Elissa L.. 1996. “Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants.” Science 274: 1926–1928.
Saffran, Jenny R., Newport, Elissa L., and Aslin, Richard N.. 1996. “Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues.” Journal of Memory and Language 35: 606–621.
Schirmeier, Matthias K., Derwing, Bruce L., and Libben, Gary. 2004. “Lexicality, morphological structure, and semantic transparency in the processing of German verbs: The complementarity of on-line and off-line evidence.” Brain and Language 90(1–3): 74–87.
Shi, Lei, Griffiths, Thomas L., Feldman, Naomi H., and Sanborn, Adam N.. 2010. “Exemplar models as a mechanism for performing Bayesian inference.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 17(4): 443–464.
Sims, Andrea D. 2006. “Minding the gaps: Inflectional defectiveness in paradigmatic morphology.” Ph.D. thesis, Linguistics Department, The Ohio State University.
Sims, Andrea D. 2009. “Why paradigmatic gaps are, and aren't, the result of competing morphological patterns.” In Proceedings of the forty-third annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, vol. II, ed. Elliott, Malcolm, Kirby, James, Sawada, Osamu, Staraki, Eleni, and Yoon, Suwon, 267–281. Chicago: CLS.
Sims, Andrea D., Daland, Robert, and Pierrehumbert, Janet. In prep. “Inflectional defectiveness: A ‘paradigm’ case of implicit learning.” Ms. The Ohio State University.
Smolensky, Paul. 1996. “On the comprehension/production dilemma in child language.” Linguistic Inquiry 27(4): 720–731.
Spencer, Andrew. 1999. “Analytic tenses in Slavic: An LFG approach.” Paper presented at Conference on Generative linguistics in Poland, Warsaw.
Spencer, Andrew. 2004. “Morphology: An overview of central concepts.” In Projecting morphology, ed. Sadler, Louisa and Spencer, Andrew, 67–106. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Spencer, Andrew. 2005. “Towards a typology of ‘mixed categories’.” In Morphology and the web of grammar: Essays in memory of Steven G. Lapointe, ed. Orgun, Cemil Orhan and Sells, Peter, 95–138. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Spencer, Andrew. 2009. “Realization-based morphosyntax: The German genitive.” In On inflection, ed. Steinkrüger, Patrick O. and Krifka, Manfred, 173–218. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Stassen, Leon. 2011. “Zero copula for predicate nominals.” In The world atlas of language structures online, ed. Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. Available at http://wals.info/chapter/120 (accessed April 9, 2015).
Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2008. “Negative entrenchment: A usage-based approach to negative evidence.” Cognitive Linguistics 19(3): 513–531.
Steriade, Donca. 1999. “Lexical conservatism.” In Linguistics in the morning calm: Selected papers from SICOL-'97, 157–179. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co.
Stewart, Thomas W., and Stump, Gregory T.. 2007. “Paradigm Function Morphology and the morphology–syntax interface.” In The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, ed. Ramchand, Gillian and Reiss, Charles, 383–421. Oxford University Press.
Stump, Gregory T. 2001. Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge University Press.
Stump, Gregory T. 2002. “Morphological and syntactic paradigms: Arguments for a theory of paradigm linkage.” In Booij and van Marle (eds.), 147–180.
Stump, Gregory T. 2005. “Some criticisms of Carstairs-McCarthy's conclusions.” In Yearbook of morphology 2005, ed. Booij, Geert and van Marle, Jaap, 283–303. Amsterdam: Springer.
Stump, Gregory T. 2006. “Heteroclisis and paradigm linkage.” Language 82(2): 279–322.
Stump, Gregory T. 2010. “Interactions between defectiveness and syncretism.” In Baerman et al. (eds.), 181–210.
Stump, Gregory T., and Finkel, Raphael A.. 2013. Morphological typology: From word to paradigm. Cambridge University Press.
Sulkala, Helena, and Karjalainen, Merja. 1992. Finnish. London: Routledge.
Švedova, Julja. 1982. Grammatika sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo jayzka. Moscow: Nauka.
Taft, Marcus. 1979. “Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect.” Memory and Cognition 7(4): 263–272.
Taft, Marcus, and Forster, Kenneth. 1975. “Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14(6): 638–647.
Tenenbaum, Joshua B., and Griffiths, Thomas L.. 2001. “Generalization, similarity, and Bayesian inference.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 629–640.
Thornton, Anna Maria. 2011. “Overabundance (multiple forms realizing the same cell): A non-canonical phenomenon in Italian verb morphology.” In Maiden et al. (eds.), 358–381.
Thymé, Ann, Ackerman, Farrell, and Elman, Jeffrey L.. 1994. “Finnish nominal inflection: Paradigmatic patterns and token analogy.” In The reality of linguistic rules, ed. Lima, Susan D., Corrigan, Roberta L., and Iverson, Gregory K., 445–466. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Timberlake, Alan. 1977. “Reanalysis and actualization in syntactic change.” In Mechanisms of syntactic change, ed. Li, Charles N., 141–177. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Timberlake, Alan. 2004. A reference grammar of Russian. Cambridge University Press.
Tomasello, Michael. 2000. “First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition.” Cognitive Linguistics 11: 61–82.
Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tomasello, Michael. 2004. “Syntax or semantics? Response to Lidz et al.” Cognition 93(2): 139–140.
Tonnet, Henri. 1993. Histoire du grec moderne. Paris: L'Asiathèque.
Törkenczy, Miklós. 2002. “Absolute phonological ungrammaticality in output-based phonology.” In Approaches to Hungarian, vol. VIII: Papers from the Budapest conference, ed. Kenesi, Istvan and Síptar, Péter, 311–324. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Trubetzkoy, N. S. 1969[1939]. Principles of phonology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Unbegaun, B. O. 1935. La langue russe au XVIe siècle (1500–1550): 1 La flexion des noms. Paris.
Ušakov, D. N., ed 1974. Tolkovyj slovar′ russkogo jazyka. Cambridge, MA: Slavica Publishers.
Valentine, J. Randolph. 2001. Nishnaabemwin reference grammar. University of Toronto Press.
Wechsler, Stephen, and Zlatić, Larisa. 2001. “Case realization and identity.” Lingua 111(4–7): 539–560.
Wedel, Andrew. 2007. “Feedback and regularity in the lexicon.” Phonology 24(1): 147–185.
Whitney, William Dwight. 1889. Sanskrit grammar, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wunderlich, Dieter. 2001. “How gaps and substitutions can become optimal: the pronominal affix paradigms of Yimas.” Transactions of the Philological Society 99: 315–366.
Wunderlich, Dieter. 2004. “Is there any need for the concept of directional syncretism?” In Müller et al. (eds.), 373–395.
Wurzel, Wolfgang U. 1989. Inflectional morphology and naturalness. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Young, Katherine M. 1984. “Multiple case assignments.” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.
Zaenen, Annie, and Karttunen, Lauri. 1984. “Morphological non-distinctiveness and coordination.” In Proceedings of the First Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, ed. Alvarez, Gloria, Brodie, Belinda, and McCoy, Terry, 309–320. Columbus: Ohio State University, Department of Linguistics.
Zaliznjak, A. A. 1967. Russkoe imennoe slovoizmenenie. Moscow: Nauka.
Zaliznjak, A.A. 1973. “O ponimanii termina ‘padež’ v lingvističeskix opisanijax.” In Problemy grammatičeskogo modelirovanija, ed. Zaliznjak, A. A., 53–87. Moscow: Nauka.
Zaliznjak, A.A. ed. 1977. Grammatičeskij slovar' russkogo jazyka: Slovoizmenenie. Moskva: Russkij-jazyk.
Zubin, David A., and Köpcke, Klaus-Michael. 1981. “Gender: A less than arbitrary grammatical category.” In Proceedings of the seventeenth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 439–449. Chicago: CLS.
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1985. “How to describe inflection.” In Proceedings of the eleventh annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. Niepokuj, Mary, VanClay, Mary, Nikiforidou, Vassiliki, and Feder, Deborah, 371–386. University of California at Berkeley, Department of Linguistics.
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1991. “Systematic versus accidental phonological identity.” In Paradigms: The economy of inflection, ed. Plank, Frans, 113–131. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1992. “Some choices in the theory of morphology.” In Formal grammar: Theory and implementation, ed. Levine, Robert, 327–371. Oxford University Press.
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1996. “Syntax and phonology.” In Concise encyclopedia of syntactic theories, ed. Brown, Keith and Miller, Jim, 300–305. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Zwicky, Arnold M. 2000. “Describing syncretism: Rules of referral after fifteen years.” Paper presented at twenty-sixth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. University of California at Berkeley.
Zwicky, Arnold M., and Pullum, Geoffrey K.. 1983. “Cliticization vs. inflection: English n't.” Language 59(3): 502–513.
