Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 14
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
April 2023
Print publication year:
2023
Online ISBN:
9781108690010

Book description

Since democratization, Latin America has experienced a surge in new forms of citizen participation. Yet there is still little comparative knowledge on these so-called democratic innovations. This Element seeks to fill this gap. Drawing on a new dataset with 3,744 cases from 18 countries between 1990 and 2020, it presents the first large-N cross-country study of democratic innovations to date. It also introduces a typology of twenty kinds of democratic innovations, which are based on four means of participation, namely deliberation, citizen representation, digital engagement, and direct voting. Adopting a pragmatist, problem-driven approach, this Element claims that democratic innovations seek to enhance democracy by addressing public problems through combinations of those four means of participation in pursuit of one or more of five ends of innovations, namely accountability, responsiveness, rule of law, social equality, and political inclusion.

References

Abers, R. (1998). From clientelism to cooperation: Local government, participatory policy, and civic organizing in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Politics & Society, 26(4), 511537.
Abers, R., & Keck, M. E. (2013). Practical Authority: Agency and Institutional Change in Brazilian Water Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Abramovay, P. (2017). Sistemas deliberativos e processo decisório congressual: Um estudo sobre a aprovação do Marco Civil da Internet. Doctoral Dissertation. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos of the State University of Rio de Janeiro.
Aitamurto, T., & Landemore, H. E. (2015). Five design principles for crowdsourced policymaking. Journal of Social Media for Organizations, 2(1),119.
Alsina, V., & Martí, J. L. (2018). The birth of the CrowdLaw movement: Tech-based citizen participation, legitimacy and the quality of lawmaking. Analyse & Kritik, 40(2), 337358.
Altman, D. (2011). Direct Democracy Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Altschuler, D., & Corrales, J. (2013). The Promise of Participation: Experiments in Participatory Governance in Honduras and Guatemala. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ansell, C. (2011). Pragmatist Democracy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Arendt, H. (1970). On Violence. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Armada, F., Muntaner, C., Chung, H., Williams-Brennan, L., & Benach, J. (2009). Barrio Adentro and the reduction of health inequalities in Venezuela. International Journal of Health Services, 39(1), 161187.
Avritzer, L. (2002). Democracy and the Public Space in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Avritzer, L. (2009). Participatory Institutions in Democratic Brazil. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Avritzer, L. (2017). The Two Sides of Institutional Innovation: Promises and Limits of Democratic Participation in Latin America. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Baiocchi, G. (2003). Radicals in Power: The Workers’ Party and Experiments in Urban Democracy in Brazil. London: Zed Books.
Baiocchi, G., & Ganuza, E. (2017). Popular Democracy. The Paradox of Participation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Balderacchi, C. (2015). Participatory mechanisms in Bolivia, Ecuador and Venezuela: Deepening or undermining democracy? Government and Opposition, 52(1), 131161.
Bohman, J. (1998). Survey article: The coming of age of deliberative democracy. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 6(4), 400425.
Breuer, A. (2007). Institutions of direct democracy and accountability in Latin America’s presidential democracies. Democratization, 14(4), 554579.
Breuer, A., & Welp, Y. (2014). Digital trends in Latin American politics (1990–2012). In Breuer, A. and Welp, Y., eds., Digital Technologies for Democratic Governance in Latin America: Opportunities and Risks. London: Routledge, pp. 116.
Cameron, M. A., Hershberg, E., & Sharpe, K. (2012). New Institutions for Participatory Democracy in Latin America. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Canel, E. (2010). Barrio Democracy in Latin America: Participatory Decentralization and Community Activism in Montevideo. University Park: Penn State University Press.
Cinara. (2014). Levantamiento de línea base, sistematización y evaluación de los proyectos seleccionados de Ideas para el Cambio 2012. Cali: Universidad del Valle.
Coelho, V. S. P. (2007). Brazilian health councils: Including the excluded? In Cornwall, A. & Coelho, V. S. P. eds., Spaces for Change? London: Zed Books, 3354.
Collado, A. (2018). Las políticas públicas de participación ciudadana en Chile. Revista Estudios de Políticas Públicas, 4(1), 7998.
Collier, D., & Levitsky, S. (2009). Conceptual hierarchies in comparative research: The case of democracy. In Collier, D. and Gerring, J., eds., Concepts and Method in Social Science: The Tradition of Giovanni Sartori. London: Routledge, 269288.
Collier, D., LaPorte, J., & Seawright, J. (2008). Putting typologies to work: Concept formation, measurement, and analytic rigor. Political Research Quarterly, 65(1), 217232.
Cornwall, A., & Coelho, V. S. (2007). Spaces for Change? The Politics of Citizen Participation in New Democratic Arenas, Vol. 4. London: Zed Books.
Dagnino, E. (2010). Civil society in Latin America: Participatory citizens or service providers? In H. Moksnes and M. Melin, eds., Power to the People? (Con-)tested Civil Society in Search of Democracy. Uppsala: Uppsala University, 2339.
Dagnino, E., Olvera, A., & Panfichi, A. (2008). Democratic innovation in Latin America: A first look at the democratic participatory project. In D. Evelina, O. Alberto, and P. Aldo, eds., Democratic Innovation in the South. Buenos Aires: Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales, 2746.
Dewey, J. (1939). The Public and its Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Donaghy, M. M. (2013). Civil Society and Participatory Governance: Municipal Councils and Social Housing Programs in Brazil. London: Routledge.
Dryzek, J. S. (2007). Theory, evidence, and the tasks of deliberation. In Rosenberg, S., ed., Deliberation, Participation and Democracy. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 237250.
Durán-Martínez, A. (2012). Presidents, parties, and referenda in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies, 45(9), 11591187.
Elstub, S., & Escobar, O. (2019). Defining and typologising democratic innovations. In S. Elstub and O. Escobar, eds., Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1131.
Falleti, T. G., & Cunial, S. L. (2018). Participation in Social Policy: Public Health in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Falleti, T. G., & Riofrancos, T. (2018). Endogenous participation: Strengthening prior consultation in extractive economies. World Politics, 70(1), 86121.
FAO [Food and Agriculture Organization], IFAD [International Fund for Agricultural Development] & WFP [World Food Programme]. (2013). The State of Food Insecurity in the World: The Multiple Dimensions of Food Security. Rome: FAO.
Fiorini, E. (2015). COPISA in Ecuador: Participation that Wasn’t. Master’s Thesis. Tucson: Graduate College of Latin American Studies, University of Arizona.
Flemmer, R., & Schilling‐Vacaflor, A. (2016). Unfulfilled promises of the consultation approach: The limits to effective indigenous participation in Bolivia’s and Peru’s extractive industries. Third World Quarterly, 37(1), 172–88.
Frega, R. (2019). Pragmatism and the Wide View of Democracy. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fung, A. (2003). Recipes for public spheres: Eight institutional design choices and their consequences. Journal of Political Philosophy, 1(3), 338–67.
Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 6675.
Fung, A. (2011). Reinventing democracy in Latin America. Perspective on Politics, 9(4), 857–71.
Fung, A. (2012). Continuous institutional innovation and the pragmatic conception of democracy. Polity, 44(4), 609624.
Fung, A. (2015). Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 513–22.
Fung, A., & Wright, R. O. (2003). Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. London: Verso.
Ganuza, E., & Baiocchi, G. (2012). The power of ambiguity: How participatory budgeting travels the globe. Journal of Public Deliberation, 8(2), 112.
García-Guadilla, M. (2008). La praxis de los consejos comunales en Venezuela. Revista Venezolana de Economía y Ciencias Sociales, 14(1), 125–51.
Geissel, B. (2012). Impacts of democratic innovations in Europe: Findings and desiderata. In B. Geissel and K. Newton, eds., Evaluating Democratic Innovations: Curing the Democratic Malaise? London: Routledge, 163–83.
Geissel, B. (2013). Introduction: On the Evaluation of Participatory Innovations - A Preliminary Framework. In Geissel, B., & Joas, M. eds. Participatory democratic innovations in Europe: Improving the quality of democracy? Verlag Barbara Budrich.
Goldfrank, B. (2006). Los procesos de “presupuesto participativo” en América Latina: Éxito, fracaso y cambio. Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago), 26(2), 328.
Goldfrank, B. (2011). Deepening Local Democracy in Latin America. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Goldfrank, B. (2012). The World Bank and the globalization of participatory budgeting. Journal of Public Deliberation, 8(2), 118.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hall, P. A., & Thelen, K. (2009). Institutional change in varieties of capitalism. Socio-economic review, 7(1), 734.
Hawkins, K. A. (2010). Who mobilizes? Participatory democracy in Chávez’s Bolivarian revolution. Latin American Politics and Society, 52, 3166.
Heller, P., & Rao, V. (2015). Deliberation and Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. (2004). Informal institutions and comparative politics: A research agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2(4), 725740.
Helvetas & UNICEF. (2018). El primer Programa de Saneamiento Total Liderado por la Comunidad (SANTOLIC) en Guatemala, https://helvetas.org/es/guatemala/quienes-somos/Nuestros%20Proyectos/SAHTOSO.
Hendriks, C. (2016). Coupling citizens and elites in deliberative systems: The role of institutional design. European Journal of Political Research, 55(1), 4360.
Herrera, V. (2017). From participatory promises to partisan capture: Local democratic transitions and Mexican water politics. Comparative Politics, 49(4), 479499.
He, B., & Warren, M. E. (2011). Authoritarian Deliberation: The Deliberative Turn in Chinese Political Development. Perspectives on Politics, 9(2), 269289.
Hevia, F. J., & Isunza Vera, E. (2012). Participación acotada: Consejos consultivos e incidencia en políticas públicas en el ámbito federal mexicano. In M. A. Cameron, E. Hershberg and K. E. Sharp, eds., Nuevas instituciones de democracia participativa en América Latina: La voz y sus consecuencias. Mexico City: Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, pp. 105–36.
International, IDEA. (2021). Global State of Democracy Report 2021, https://idea.int/democracytracker/sites/default/files/2022-11/GSOD21.pdf.
Jann, W., & Wegrich, K. (2007). Theories of the Policy Cycle. In F. Fischer, G. J. Miller and M. S. Sidney, eds., Handbook of Public Policy Analysis. New York: Routledge, 4362.
Knight, J., & Johnson, J. (2011). The Priority of Democracy: Political Consequences of Pragmatism. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
Knill, C., & Tosun, J. (2012). Public Policy: A New Introduction. London: Macmillan International Higher Education.
Latinobarómetro Corporation. (2021). Latinobarómetro Report 2021, https://latinobarometro.org/latContents.jsp.
Levitsky, S., & Loxton, J. (2013). Populism and competitive authoritarianism in the Andes. Democratization, 20(1), 107–36.
Levitsky, S., & Murillo, M. V. (2009). Variation in institutional strength. Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 115–33.
Lissidini, A. (2010). Democracia directa en América Latina: Riesgos y oportunidades. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.
López Maya, M. (2011). Los consejos comunales en Caracas vistos por sus participantes: una exploración. Política & Sociedad, 10(18), 187222.
Mainwaring, S. (2012). From Representative Democracy to Participatory Competitive Authoritarianism: Hugo Chávez and Venezuelan Politics. Perspectives on Politics, 10(4), 955967.
Mansbridge, J. (2015). A minimalist definition of deliberation. In P. Heller and V. Rao, eds., Deliberation and Development. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2749.
Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers., S. et al. (2012). A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. In J. Parkinson and J. Mansbridge, eds., Deliberative Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 126.
Margetts, H., John, P., Hale, S., & Yasseri, T. (2015). Political Turbulence: How Social Media Shape Collective Action. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Mayka, L. (2019). Building Participatory Institutions in Latin America: Reform Coalitions and Institutional Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). The Dynamics of Contention. New York: Cambridge University Press.
McNulty, S. L. (2019). Democracy from Above? The Unfulfilled Promise of Nationally Mandated Participatory Reforms. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Merkel, W. (2011). Volksabstimmungen: Illusion und Realität. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 44(45), 4755.
Morlino, L. (2011). Changes for Democracy: Actors, Structures, Processes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Muntaner, C., Armada, F., Chung, H., et al. (2008). “Barrio Adentro” en Venezuela: Democracia participativa, cooperación sur-sur y salud para todos. Medicina Social, 3(4), 306–22.
Murillo, M. V. (2020). Elections and Protests in Latin America: Covid-19’s Impact. Items, Insights from the Social Science, https://items.ssrc.org/covid-19-and-the-social-sciences/democracy-and-pandemics/elections-and-protests-in-latin-america-covid-19s-impact/.
Murillo, M. V. (2021). Protestas, descontento y democracia en América Latina. Nueva Sociedad (294), https://biblat.unam.mx/hevila/Nuevasociedad/2021/no294/1.pdf.
Noveck, B. S. (2018). CrowdLaw: Collective intelligence and lawmaking. Analyse & Kritik, 40, 359–80.
O’Donnell, G., & Schmitter, P. C. (1986). Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
O’Donnell, G. (1993). On the state, democratization and some conceptual problems: A Latin American view with glances at some postcommunist countries. World Development, 21(8), 13551369.
O’Donnell, G. (2004). The quality of democracy: Why the rule of law matters. Journal of Democracy, 4, 3246.
OECD. (2020). Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions: Catching the Deliberative Wave. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/339306da-en.
Paredes, J. P. (2011). Ciudadanía, participación y democracia: Deuda y déficit en los 20 años de “democracia” en Chile. Polis, Revista de la Universidad Bolivariana, 10(20), 473499.
Parkinson, J. (2012). Democratizing deliberative systems. In J. Parkinson and J. Mansbridge, eds., Deliberative Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 151–72.
Pateman, C. (2012). Participatory democracy revisited. Perspectives on Politics, 10(1), 719.
Peixoto, T., & Sifry, M. L. (2017). Civic Tech in The Global South: Assessing Technology for the Public Good. Washington, DC: World Bank Personal Democracy Press.
Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Pogrebinschi, T. (2013).The Pragmatic Turn of Democracy in Latin America. FES Studies. Berlin: Friedrich-Erbert-Stiftung.
Pogrebinschi, T. (2018). Experimenting with participation and deliberation in Latin America: Is democracy turning pragmatic? In Falleti, T. and Parrado, E., eds., Latin America Since the Left Turn. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 241263.
Pogrebinschi, T. (2020). Might social intelligence save Latin America from its governments in times of Covid-19? Open Democracy, https://opendemocracy.net/en/democraciaabierta/puede-la-inteligencia-social-salvar-a-america-latina-de-sus-gobiernos-en-tiempos-de-covid-en/.
Pogrebinschi, T. (2021a). LATINNO Dataset on Democratic Innovations in Latin America. Version 1.0.0. WZB Berlin Social Science Center. Dataset, DOI: https://doi.org/10.7802/2278.
Pogrebinschi, T. (2021b). Codebook for the LATINNO Dataset. Berlin: WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
Pogrebinschi, T. (2021c). Thirty Years of Democratic Innovations in Latin America. Berlin: WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
Pogrebinschi, T. & Acosta, F. A. (2023). The Impact of Democratic Innovations in Latin America. In: Jacquet, V., Ryan, M., & van der Does, R. (Eds.). The impact of democratic innovations. Colchester: ECPR Press, 2023.
Pogrebinschi, T., & Ross, M. (2019). Democratic innovations in Latin America. In S. Elstub and O. Escobar, eds., Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance. Massachusetts, USA: Edward Elgar, 389403.
Pogrebinschi, T., & Samuels, D. (2014). The impact of participatory democracy: Evidence from Brazil’s national public policy conference. Comparative Politics, 46(3), 313332.
Pogrebinschi, T., & Santos, F. (2011). Participação como representação: O impacto das conferências nacionais de políticas públicas no Congresso Nacional. Dados, 54(3), 259305.
Pogrebinschi, T., & Tanscheit, T. (2017a). Moving Backwards: What Happened to Citizen Participation in Brazil? Open Democracy, https://opendemocracy.net/en/democraciaabierta/moving-backwards-what-happened-to-citizen-part/.
Pogrebinschi, T., & Ventura, T. (2017b). Mais participação, maior responsividade? Dados, 60(1), 743.
Rich, J. A., Mayka, L., & Montero, A. P. (2019). The politics of participation in Latin America: New actors and institutions. Latin American Politics and Society, 61(2), 120.
Roberts, K. M. (1998). Deepening Democracy? The Modern Left and Social Movements in Chile and Peru. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Roberts, K. M. (2016). (Re)Politicizing inequalities: Movements, parties, and social citizenship in Chile. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 8(3), 125–54.
Ryan, M. (2021). Why Citizen Participation Succeeds or Fails: A Comparative Analysis of Participatory Budgeting. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
Sartori, G. (1970). Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 64(4), 1033–53.
Sartori, G. (2009 [1975]). The tower of Babel. In Collier, D. and Gerring, J., eds., Concepts and Method in Social Science: The Tradition of Giovanni Sartori. London: Routledge, 97150.
Selee, A., & Peruzzotti, E. (eds.) (2009). Participatory Innovation and Representative Democracy in Latin America. Baltimore: Woodrow Wilson Center Press
Smith, G. (2009). Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shenk, J. (2022). Comparative Politics, Volume 55, Number 1, October 2022, pp. 122(22).
Smith, G. (2019). Reflections on the theory and practice of democratic innovations. In S. Elstub and O. Escobar, eds., Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 572582.
Spada, P., & Ryan, M. (2017), The failure to examine failures in democratic innovations. PS: Political Science & Politics, 50(3), 772778.
Statista. (2021). Number of internet users in selected Latin American countries 2021 (in millions). Statista Inc. https://statista.com/statistics/186919/number-of-internet-users-in-latin-american-countries/.
Strandberg, K., & Grönlund, K. (2018). Online deliberation. In : A. Bächtiger, J. S. Dryzek, J. Mansbridge and M. E. Warren, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 365377.
Tapia, A. and Hernandez, M. (2016). La situación de los defensores de Derechos Humanos en Colombia. Cuadernos Deusto de Derechos Humanos, 82.
Touchton, M., & Wampler, B. (2014). Improving social well-being through new democratic institutions. Comparative Political Studies, 47(10), 14421469.
UNDP Honduras. (2019). Avances en municipios con los Observatorios Municipales de Convivencia y Seguridad Ciudadana (OMCSC). Retrieved from www.hn.undp.org/content/honduras/es/home/library/infosegura/avances-en-municipios-con-los-observatorios-municipales-de-convi.html.
UNDP. (2009). Guatemala: hacia un estado para el desarollo humano. Informe nacional de desarrollo humano 2009/2010. desarrollohumano.org.gt/biblioteca/informes-nacionales/.
UNDP. (2014). Devolución del Diálogo Nacional sobre VIH y el derecho: Un proceso participativo de consulta sobre los retos en Guatemala.
Unger, R. (1998). Democracy Realized. London: Verso.
Urbinati, N., & Warren, M. E. (2008). The concept of representation in contemporary democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 387412.
Velásquez, F. E. (2011). La institucionalización de la participación en Colombia. Política & Sociedade, 10(18), 155186.
von Bülow, M., & Donoso, S. (2017). Introduction: Social movements in contemporary Chile. In S. Donoso and M. von Bülow, eds., Social Movements in Chile: Organization, Trajectories, and Political Consequences. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 328.
Wampler, B. (2007). Participatory Budgeting in Brazil: Contestation, Cooperation, and Accountability. University Park: Penn State University Press.
Wampler, B., & Goldfrank, B. (2022). The Rise, Spread, and Decline of Brazil’s Participatory Budgeting. The Arc of a Democratic Innovation, Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wampler, B., McNulty, S., & Touchton, M. (2021). Participatory Budgeting in Global Perspective. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Wampler, B., Sugiyama, N. B., & Touchton, M. (2019). Democracy at Work: Pathways to Well-Being in Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Warren, M. E. (2008). Citizen representatives. In Warren, M. and Pearse, H., eds., Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 5069.
Warren, M. E. (2009). Governance driven democratization. Critical Policy Studies, 3(3), 313.
Warren, M. E. (2017). A Problem-based approach to democratic theory. American Political Science Review, 111.
Welp, Y. (2018). Recall referendum around the world. In L. Morel and M. Qvortrup, eds., The Routledge Handbook to Referendums and Direct Democracy. New York: Routledge, 451463.
Zaremberg, G., Guarneros-Meza, V., & Lavalle, A. G. (2017). Intermediation and Representation in Latin America. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.