Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home
International Security in Practice
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 121
  • Cited by
    This book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Lehti, Marko 2019. The Era of Private Peacemakers. p. 1.

    Loe, Julia S. P. 2019. “But it is our duty!” Exploring Gazprom’s reluctance to Russian gas sector reform. Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 35, Issue. 1, p. 63.

    Mattheis, Frank Raineri, Luca and Russo, Alessandra 2019. Fringe Regionalism. p. 7.

    Cornut, Jérémie 2018. Diplomacy, agency, and the logic of improvisation and virtuosity in practice. European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 24, Issue. 3, p. 712.

    Bueger, Christian and Gadinger, Frank 2018. International Practice Theory. p. 69.

    de Carvalho, Benjamin Schia, Niels Nagelhus and Guillaume, Xavier 2018. Everyday sovereignty: International experts, brokers and local ownership in peacebuilding Liberia. European Journal of International Relations, p. 135406611875917.

    Glas, Aarie van der Linden, Clifton Hoffmann, Matthew J and Denemark, Robert A 2018. Understanding Multilateral Treaty-Making as Constitutive Practice. Journal of Global Security Studies, Vol. 3, Issue. 3, p. 339.

    da Mota, Sarah 2018. NATO, Civilisation and Individuals. p. 1.

    Bueger, Christian and Gadinger, Frank 2018. International Practice Theory. p. 13.

    Franke, Ulrich and Roos, Ulrich 2018. Handbuch Methoden der Politikwissenschaft. p. 1.

    Simão, Licínia 2018. The EU’s Neighbourhood Policy towards the South Caucasus. p. 51.

    Bueger, Christian and Gadinger, Frank 2018. International Practice Theory. p. 1.

    Zyla, Benjamin 2018. Transatlantic burden sharing: suggesting a new research agenda. European Security, Vol. 27, Issue. 4, p. 515.

    Bueger, Christian and Gadinger, Frank 2018. International Practice Theory. p. 35.

    Barnett, Michael 2018. Human rights, humanitarianism, and the practices of humanity. International Theory, Vol. 10, Issue. 3, p. 314.

    Mitzen, Jennifer 2018. Anxious community: EU as (in)security community. European Security, Vol. 27, Issue. 3, p. 393.

    Simão, Licínia 2018. The EU’s Neighbourhood Policy towards the South Caucasus. p. 95.

    McConnell, Fiona 2018. Performing Diplomatic Decorum: Repertoires of “Appropriate” Behavior in the Margins of International Diplomacy. International Political Sociology, Vol. 12, Issue. 4, p. 362.

    Jackson, Thomas 2018. Paradiplomacy and political geography: The geopolitics of substate regional diplomacy. Geography Compass, Vol. 12, Issue. 2, p. e12357.

    Hopf, Ted 2018. Change in international practices. European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 24, Issue. 3, p. 687.

    ×

Book description

How do once bitter enemies move beyond entrenched rivalry at the diplomatic level? In one of the first attempts to apply practice theory to the study of International Relations, Vincent Pouliot builds on Pierre Bourdieu's sociology to devise a theory of practice of security communities and applies it to post-Cold War security relations between NATO and Russia. Based on dozens of interviews and a thorough analysis of recent history, Pouliot demonstrates that diplomacy has become a normal, though not a self-evident, practice between the two former enemies. He argues that this limited pacification is due to the intense symbolic power struggles that have plagued the relationship ever since NATO began its process of enlargement at the geographical and functional levels. So long as Russia and NATO do not cast each other in the roles that they actually play together, security community development is bound to remain limited.

Reviews

‘Every decade, an International Relations book comes along that leaves a profound and lasting mark on the discipline. International Security in Practice suggests a paradigmatic new ‘logic of practicality’, a methodological approach for empirically studying practices, and an innovative theory of practice of security communities. It also shows lucidly and effectively why NATO and Russia failed to constitute a security community after the Cold War, what was NATO's role in such failure, and what can still be practically done to ‘seduce’ Russia back into the communitarian mode of pursuing security. This brilliant book pushes the boundaries of IR theory forward - read it!’

Emanuel Adler - Andrea and Charles Bronfman Chair of Israeli Studies, University of Toronto

‘Instead of abstract speculation, Vincent Pouliot delivers hands-on analysis. This fully-fledged Bourdieusian practice analysis is a significant contribution towards making International Relations a truly social science. Should be the next big thing in constructivist IR.’

Iver B. Neumann - Director of Research, Norwegian Institute of International Affairs and Professor of Russian Studies, Oslo University

'In sum, Pouliot's book is a very important and innovative piece of scholarship.'

Tuomas Forsberg Source: Europe-Asia Studies

Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×
Bibliography
Adler, Emanuel (1997), “Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics,” European Journal of International Relations 3(3): 319–63.
Adler, Emanuel (1998), “Seeds of Peaceful Change: The OSCE's Security Community-Building Model,” in Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael, eds., Security Communities, 119–60. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Adler, Emanuel (2002), “Constructivism and International Relations,” in Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas and Simmons, Beth A., eds., Handbook of International Relations, 95–118. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Adler, Emanuel (2005), Communitarian International Relations: The Epistemic Foundations of International Relations. New York: Routledge.
Adler, Emanuel (2008), “The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO's Post Cold War Transformation,” European Journal of International Relations 14(2): 195–230.
Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael (1998), “A Framework for the Study of Security Communities,” in Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael, eds., Security Communities, 29–65. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Adler, Emanuel and Grieve, Patricia (2009), “When Security Community Meets Balance of Power: Overlapping Regional Mechanisms of Security Governance,” Review of International Studies 35(1): 59–84.
Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent (n.d.), “The Practice Turn: Introduction and Framework,” mimeo, August 2008.
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca (2008), “The Diplomacy of Opting Out: A Bourdieudian Approach to National Integration Strategies,” Journal of Common Market Studies 46(3): 663–84.
Allison, Roy (2006), “Russian Security Engagement with NATO,” in Roy Allison, Margot Light and Stephen White, Putin's Russia and the Enlarged Europe, 94–129. Oxford: Blackwell.
Ambrosio, Thomas (2005), Challenging America's Global Preeminence: Russia's Quest for Multipolarity. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Antonenko, Oksana (2007), “Russia and the Deadlock over Kosovo,” Survival 49(3): 91–106.
Arbatov, Alexei and Dvorkin, Vladimir (2006), Beyond Nuclear Deterrence: Transforming the U.S.– Russian Equation. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Ashley, Richard (1987), “The Geopolitics of Geopolitical Space: Toward a Critical Social Theory of International Politics,” Alternatives 12(4): 403–34.
Asmus, Ronald D. (2002), Opening NATO's Door: How the Alliance Remade Itself for a New Era. New York: Columbia University Press.
Asmus, Ronald D., Kugler, Richard L. and Larrabee, F. Stephen (1993), “Building a New NATO,” Foreign Affairs 72(4): 28–40.
Baker, James A. III (2002), “Russia in NATO?Washington Quarterly 25(1): 95–103.
Baranovsky, Vladimir (2000), “Russia: A Part of Europe or Apart from Europe?International Affairs 76(3): 443–58.
Baranovsky, Vladimir (2002), “11 septembre: une vision russe” (11 September: A Russian View”)Politique étrangère 67(1): 9–20.
Baranovsky, Vladimir (2003), “Russian Views on NATO and the EU,” in Lieven, Anatol and Trenin, Dmitri, eds., Ambivalent Neighbors: The EU, NATO and the Price of Membership, 269–94. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Barnes, Barry (2001), “Practice as Collective Action,” in Schatzki, Theodore R., Cetina, Karin Knorr and Savigny, Eike, eds., The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, 17–28. New York: Routledge.
Barnett, Michael (2002), Eyewitness to a Genocide: The United Nations and Rwanda. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Barnett, Michael and Adler, Emanuel (1998), “Studying Security Communities in Theory, Comparison, and History,” in Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael, eds., Security Communities, 413–41. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Barnett, Michael and Duvall, Raymond (2005), “Power in International Politics,”International Organization 59(1): 39–75.
Barnett, Michael and Finnemore, Martha (2004), Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Bartelson, Jens (1995), A Genealogy of Sovereignty. New York: Cambridge University Press.
,BBC (2008), “Rice Criticises ‘Isolated’ Russia,” September 19 (http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7623555.stm, accessed September 19, 2008).
Berridge, G. R., ed. (2004), Diplomatic Classics: Selected Texts from Commynes to Vattel. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bigo, Didier (1996), Polices en réseaux. L'expérience européenne (Networked Police: The European Experience). Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
Bigo, Didier (2000), “When Two Become One: Internal and External Securitisations in Europe,” in Kelstrup, Morten and Williams, Michael C., eds., International Relations Theory and the Politics of European Integration: Power, Security and Community, 171–204. New York: Routledge.
Bjola, Corneliu and Kornprobst, Markus (2007), “Security Communities and the Habitus of Restraint: Germany and the United States on Iraq,” Review of International Studies 33(2): 285–305.
Black, Ian (1997), “Albright to Offer Arms Cuts as Russia Digs in on NATO,” Guardian, February 20.
Blacker, Coit D. (1998), “Russia and the West,” in Mandelbaum, Michael, ed., The New Russian Foreign Policy, 167–93. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1980), Questions de sociologie (Questions of Sociology). Paris: Minuit.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1981), “Men and Machines,” in Knorr-Cetina, Karin and Cicourel, Aaron V., eds., Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro- and Macro-Sociologies, 304–17. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1986), “The Forms of Capital,” in Richardson, J. G., ed., Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, 241–58. New York: Greenwood.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1987), Choses dites (Things Said). Paris: Minuit.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1989), “Social Space and Symbolic Power,” Sociological Theory 7(1):14–25.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1990a [1980]), The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1990b), “The Scholastic Point of View,” Cultural Anthropology 5(4):380–91.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1994), “Rethinking the State: Genesis and Structure of the Bureaucratic Field,” Sociological Theory 12(1): 1–18.
Bourdieu, Pierre (2000 [1972]), Esquisse d'une théorie de la pratique, précédé de trois études d'ethnologie kabyle (Outline of a Theory of Practice, Preceded with Three Studies in Kabylian Ethnology). Paris: Seuil.
Bourdieu, Pierre (2001a [1982]), Langage et pouvoir symbolique (Language and Symbolic Power). Paris: Seuil.
Bourdieu, Pierre (2001b), Science de la science et réflexivité (Science of Science and Reflexivity). Paris: Raison d'agir.
Bourdieu, Pierre (2003 [1997]), Méditations pascaliennes (Pascalian Meditations). Paris: Seuil.
Bourdieu, Pierre, ed. (1993), La misère du monde (The World's Misery). Paris: Seuil.
Bourdieu, Pierre and Loïc, J. D. Wacquant (1992), “The Purpose of Reflexive Sociology (The Chicago Workshop),” in Bourdieu, Pierre and Loïc, J. D. Wacquant, An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, 60–215. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Braun, Aurel (2008), “Introduction: Thinking about Security and Democracy,” in Braun, Aurel, ed., NATO–Russia Relations in the Twenty-First Century, 1–8. New York: Routledge.
Bull, Hedley (1995 [1977]), The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, 2nd edition. New York: Columbia University Press.
Buzan, Barry, Wæver, Ole and Wilde, Jaap (1998), Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Carr, Edward Hallett (1958 [1939]), The Twenty Years' Crisis 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations, 2nd edition. London: MacMillan.
Cederman, Lars-Erik (1997), Emergent Actors in World Politics: How States and Nations Develop and Dissolve. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Charodeyev, Gennady (1999), “There's Only One Person Who Could Have Given the Order: The President,” Izvestia, June 15, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 51(24).
Checkel, Jeffrey T. (1997), Ideas and International Political Change: Soviet/Russian Behavior and the End of the Cold War. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Checkel, Jeffrey T. (2001), “Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change,” International Organization 55(3): 553–88.
Checkel, Jeffrey T. (2004), “Social Constructivisms in Global and European Politics: A Review Essay,” Review of International Studies 30(2): 229–44.
Checkel, Jeffrey T. (2005), “International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework,” International Organization 59(4): 801–26.
Checkel, Jeffrey T. (2008), “Process Tracing,” in Klotz, Audie and Prakash, Deepa, eds., Qualitative Methods in International Relations: A Pluralist Guide, 114–27. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
,CNN (2003), “Chirac Lashes Out at ‘New Europe,’” February 18 (www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/europe/02/18/sprj.irq.chirac, accessed May 31, 2008).
Colton, Timothy J. (2008), “Post-postcommunist Russia, the International Environment and NATO,” in Braun, Aurel, ed., NATO–Russia Relations in the Twenty-First Century, 25–38. New York: Routledge.
Cooper, Helene (2008), “In Georgia Clash, a Lesson on U.S. Need for Russia,” New York Times, August 9.
,Council of the EU (2003), “A Secure Europe in a Better World,” European Security Strategy, December 12.
Cox, Michael (1992), “Western Intelligence, the Soviet Threat and NSC-68: A Reply to Beatrice Heuser,” Review of International Studies 18(1): 75–86.
Crawford, Neta C. (2002), Argument and Change in World Politics: Ethics, Decolonization, and Humanitarian Intervention. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cross, Mai'a K. Davis (2006), The European Diplomatic Corps: Diplomats and International Cooperation from Westphalia to Maastricht. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Daalder, Ivo and Goldgeier, James (2006), “Global NATO,” Foreign Affairs 85(5): 105–13.
Daalder, Ivo H. and Lindsay, James M. (2005 [2003]), American Unbound: The Bush Revolution in Foreign Policy, 2nd edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
D'Andrade, Roy (1995), The Development of Cognitive Anthropology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dannreuther, Roland (1999–2000), “Escaping the Enlargement Trap in NATO–Russian Relations,” Survival 41(4): 145–64.
Certeau, Michel (1990 [1980]), L'invention du quotidien 1. Arts de faire (The Invention of the Everyday: Ways of Doing). Paris: Gallimard.
Nevers, Renée (2007), “NATO's International Security Role in the Terrorist Era,” International Security 31(4): 34–66.
Derian, James (1987), On Diplomacy: A Genealogy of Western Estrangement. Oxford: Blackwell.
Deutsch, Karl W., Burrell, Sidney A., Kann, Robert A., Lee, Maurice Jr., Lichterman, Martin, Lindgren, Raymond E., Loewenheim, Francis L. and Wagenen, Richard W. (1957), Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant (2002), The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Doty, Roxanne Lynn (1996), Imperial Encounters: The Politics of Representation in North–South Relations. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Duffy, Gavan, Frederking, Brian K. and Tucker, Seth A. (1998), “Language Games: Dialogical Analysis of INF Negotiations,” International Studies Quarterly 42(2): 271–94.
Eckstein, Harry (1975), “Case Studies and Theory in Political Science,” in Greenstein, Fred I. and Polsby, Nelson W., eds., Handbook of Political Science, vol. VII, 94–137. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Elster, Jon (1989), Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
English, Robert D. (2000), Russia and the Idea of the West: Gorbachev, Intellectuals, and the End of the Cold War. New York: Columbia University Press.
Epstein, Seymour (1994), “Integration of the Cognitive and the Psychodynamic Unconscious,” American Psychologist 49(8): 709–24.
Evangelista, Matthew (1999), Unarmed Forces: The Transnational Movement to End the Cold War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Evangelista, Matthew (2002), The Chechen Wars: Will Russia Go the Way of the Soviet Union?Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Fierke, Karin M. (1998), Changing Games, Changing Strategies: Critical Investigations in Security. New York: Manchester University Press.
Fierke, Karin M. (2004), “World or Worlds? The Analysis of Content and Discourse,” Qualitative Methods 2(1): 36–9.
Fierke, Karin M. (2005), Diplomatic Interventions: Conflict and Change in a Globalizing World. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Finnemore, Martha (2003), The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs about the Use of Force. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Finnemore, Martha and Sikkink, Kathryn (2001), “Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Programme in International Relations and Comparative Politics,” Annual Review of Political Science 4: 391–416.
Fiske, Alan Page, Kitayama, Shinobu, Markus, Hazel Rose and Nisbett, Richard E. (1999), “The Cultural Matrix of Social Psychology,” in Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T. and Lindzey, G., eds., The Handbook of Social Psychology, 3rd edition, volume II, 915–81. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Flynn, Gregory and Farrell, Henry (1999), “Piecing Together the Democratic Peace: The CSCE, Norms, and the ‘Construction’ of Security in Post-Cold War Europe,” International Organization 53(3): 505–35.
Foucault, Michel (1980), Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, edited by Colin Gordon. New York: Pantheon.
Fourcade, Marion (2006), “The Construction of a Global Profession: The Transnationalization of Economics,” American Journal of Sociology 112(1): 145–94.
Fritch, Paul (2007), “The NATO–Russia Partnership: More than Meets the Eye,” NATOReview 2.
Garfinkel, Harold (1967), Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Geertz, Clifford (1973), The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.
Geertz, Clifford (1987), “‘From the Native's Point of View’: On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding,” in Gibbons, Michael. T., ed., Interpreting Politics, 133–47. Oxford: Blackwell.
George, Alexander L. (1993), Bridging the Gap: Theory and Practice in Foreign Policy. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
George, Alexander L. and Bennett, Andrew (2005), Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ghebali, Victor-Yves (1996), L'OSCE dans l'Europe post-communiste, 1990–1996. Vers une identité paneuropéenne de sécurité (The OSCE in Post-Communist Europe, 1990–1996: Toward a Paneuropean Security Identity). Brussels: Bruylant.
Gheciu, Alexandra (2005), NATO in the “New Europe”: The Politics of International Socialization after the Cold War. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Giddens, Anthony (1984), The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Gilpin, Robert (1981), War and Change in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Glaser, Barney G. and Strauss, Anselm L. (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
Goffman, Erving (1959), The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.
Goldgeier, James M. and McFaul, Michael (2003), Power and Purpose: U.S. Policy Toward Russia after the Cold War. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Gorbachev, Mikhail (1994), “The NATO Ultimatum Was the Worst Possible Way of Handling the Bosnian Crisis,” Nezavisimaya Gazeta, February 22, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 46(7).
Gorbachev, Mikhail (1999), “No, No, NATO,” Boston Globe, July 16.
Gornostayev, Dimitri and Katin, Vladimir (1998), “‘We Shouldn't Set a Precedent for NATO,’” Nezavisimaya Gazeta, May 30, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 50(22).
Guk, Sergei (1992), “NATO Could Become Guarantor of Russia's Security,” Izvestia, January 22, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 44(3).
Gusterson, Hugh (1993), “Exploding Anthropology's Canon in the World of the Bomb: Ethnographic Writing on Militarism,” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 22(1): 59–79.
Gusterson, Hugh (2008), “Ethnographic Research,” in Klotz, Audie and Prakash, Deepa, eds., Qualitative Methods in International Relations: A Pluralist Guide, 93–113. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Guzzini, Stefano (2000), “A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations,” European Journal of International Relations 6(2): 147–82.
Guzzini, Stefano (2005), “The Concept of Power: A Constructivist Analysis,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 33(3): 495–521.
Haas, Peter M. and Haas, Ernst B. (2002), “Pragmatic Constructivism and the Study of International Institutions,” Millennium 31(3): 573–601.
Hacking, Ian (1982), “Language, Truth and Reason,” in Hollis, Martin and Lukes, Steven, eds., Rationality and Relativism, 48–66. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hacking, Ian (1999), The Social Construction of What?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hacking, Ian (2002a), Historical Ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hacking, Ian (2002b), “Inaugural Lecture: Chair of Philosophy and History of Scientific Concepts at the Collège de France, 16 January 2001,” Economy and Society 31(1): 1–14.
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. and Montgomery, Alexander H. (2006), “Power Positions: International Organizations, Social Networks, and Conflicts,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 50(1): 3–27.
Hall, Peter A. (2003), “Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Comparative Research,” in Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, eds., Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, 373–404. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hamilton, Keith and Langhorne, Richard (1995), The Practice of Diplomacy: Its Evolution, Theory and Administration. New York: Routledge.
Hansen, Lene (2006), Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. New York: Routledge.
Headley, Jim (2003), “Sarajevo, February 1994: The First Russia–NATO Crisis of the Post-Cold War Era,” Review of International Studies 29(2): 209–27.
Heider, Karl G. (1988), “The Rashomon Effect: When Ethnographers Disagree,” American Anthropologist 90(1): 73–81.
Heuser, Beatrice (1991), “NSC 68 and the Soviet Threat: A New Perspective on Western Threat Perception and Policy Making,” Review of International Studies 17(1): 17–40.
Hollis, Martin and Smith, Steve (1990), Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hopf, Ted (2002) Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies, Moscow, 1955 and 1999. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Hopf, Ted (n.d.), “The Logic of Habit in International Relations,” mimeo, May 2008.
Huysmans, Jef (2002), “Shape-shifting NATO: Humanitarian Action and the Kosovo Refugee Crisis,” Review of International Studies 28(3): 599–618.
Ivanov, Sergey B. (2004), “International Security in the Context of the Russia–NATO Relationship,” Munich, February 7 (www.securityconference.de/konferenzen/rede.php?menu_2005=&menu_konferenz, accessed July 27, 2007).
,Izvestia (2004), “Yury Baluyevsky, First Deputy Chief of the Russian General Staff: ‘NATO Expansion Will Strike a Fatal Blow to the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe,” Izvestia, March 3, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 56(9).
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus (2004), “Hegel's House, or ‘People Are States Too,’” Review of International Studies 30(2): 281–7.
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus (2006a), Civilizing the Enemy: German Reconstruction and the Invention of the West. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus (2006b), “Making Sense of Making Sense: Configurational Analysis and the Double Hermeneutic,” in Yanow, Dvora and Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine, eds., Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn, 264–80. New York: M. E. Sharpe.
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus (2008), “Foregrounding Ontology: Dualism, Monism, and IR Theory,” Review of International Studies 34(1): 129–53.
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus and Nexon, Daniel H. (1999), “Relations before States: Substance, Process and the Study of World Politics,” European Journal of International Relations 5(3): 291–332.
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus and Nexon, Daniel H. (2004), “Constructivist Realism or Realist-Constructivism?International Studies Review 6(2): 337–41.
Jackson, Peter (2008), “Pierre Bourdieu, the ‘Cultural Turn’ and the Practice of International History,” Review of International Studies 34(1): 155–81.
Johnston, Alastair Iain (2001), “Treating International Institutions as Social Environments,” International Studies Quarterly 45(4): 487–515.
Jönsson, Christer and Hall, Martin (2005), Essence of Diplomacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kagan, Robert (2003), Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order. London: Atlantic Books.
Kahneman, Daniel (2002), “Maps of Bounded Rationality: A Perspective on Intuitive Judgment and Choice” (nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/2002/kahnemann-lecture.pdf, accessed April 15, 2009).
Kassianova, Alla (2001), “Russia: Still Open to the West? Evolution of the State Identity in the Foreign Policy and Security Discourse,” Europe–Asia Studies 53(6): 821–39.
Katzenstein, Peter J., Keohane, Robert O. and Krasner, Stephen D. (1998), “International Organization and the Study of World Politics,” International Organization 52(4): 645–85.
Katzner, Donald W. (1999), “Hysteresis and the Modeling of Economic Phenomena,” Review of Political Economy 11(2): 171–81.
Kauppi, Niilo (2005), Democracy, Social Resources and Political Power in the European Union. New York: Manchester University Press.
Keck, Margaret E. and Sikkink, Kathryn (1998), Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Kipp, Jacob W., Thomas, Timothy L., Grau, Lester W.et al. (2000), “Lessons and Conclusions on the Execution of IFOR Operations and Prospects for a Future Combined Security System: The Peace and Stability of Europe after IFOR,” 2nd edition. Fort Leavenworth, KS: US Army Combined Arms Center.
Kissinger, Henry A. (1973), A World Restored: Metternich, Castlereagh and the Problem of Peace 1812–1822. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.
Kissinger, Henry A. (1994), Diplomacy. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Kitchen, Veronica (2009), “Argument and Identity Change in the Atlantic Security Community,” Security Dialogue 40(1): 95–114.
Kondrashov, Stanislav (1996), “The Diplomatic Gospel according to Yevgeny on the Eve of the Second Coronation of Boris,” Izvestia, August 9, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 48(32).
Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, Charles, and Snidal, Duncan (2001), “The Rational Design of International Institutions,” International Organization 55(4): 761–99.
Kornprobst, Markus, Pouliot, Vincent, Shah, Nisha and Zaiotti, Ruben, eds. (2008), Metaphors of Globalization: Mirrors, Magicians, and Mutinies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kozyrev, Andrei V. (1992), “Russia and Human Rights,” Slavic Review 51(2): 287–93.
Kozyrev, Andrei V. (1993), “The New Russia and the Atlantic Alliance,” NATO Review 1 (www.nato.int/docu/review/1993/9301-1.htm) accessed August 27, 2007).
Kozyrev, Andrei V. (1994a), “The Lagging Partnership,” Foreign Affairs 73(3): 59–71.
Kozyrev, Andrei V. (1994b), “Russia and the U.S.: Partnership Is Not Premature, It Is Overdue,” Izvestia, March 11, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 46(10).
Kozyrev, Andrei V. (1995), “Partnership or Cold Peace?Foreign Policy 99: 3–14.
Kramer, Mark (2002), “NATO, The Baltic States and Russia: A Framework for Sustainable Enlargement,” International Affairs 78(4): 731–56.
Kratochwil, Friedrich V. (1989), Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kratochwil, Friedrich V. (2000), “Constructing a New Orthodoxy? Wendt's ‘Social Theory of International Politics’ and the Constructivist Challenge,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 29(1): 73–101.
Kratochwil, Friedrich V. (2007), “Of False Promises and Good Bets: A Plea for a Pragmatic Approach to Theory Building (The Tartu Lecture),” Journal of International Relations and Development 10(1): 215–47.
Kujat, Harald (2002), “Combating Terrorism: A Key Objective,” Kraznaya Zvezda, reprinted and translated by NATO (www.nato.int/docu/articles/2002/a021225a.htm, accessed January 22, 2004).
Kupchan, Charles A. (1994), “Expand NATO– And Split Europe,” New York Times, November 27.
Kvale, Steinar (1996), InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lakatos, Imre (1970), “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes,” in Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave, Alan, eds., Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, 91–196. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Leander, Anna (2001), “Pierre Bourdieu on Economics,” Review of International Political Economy 8(2): 344–53.
Leander, Anna (2008) “Thinking Tools,” in Klotz, Audie and Prakash, Deepa, eds., Qualitative Methods of International Relations: A Pluralist Guide, 11–27. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lebow, Richard Ned (2008), A Cultural Theory of International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Legvold, Robert (2007), “Introduction,” in Legvold, Robert, ed., Russian Foreign Policy in the Twenty-First Century and the Shadow of the Past, 3–34. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lévesque, Jacques (1995), 1989 – La fin d'un empire. L'URSS et la liberation de l'Europe de l'Est (1989 – The End of an Empire: USSR and the Liberation of Eastern Europe). Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
Levitin, Oleg (2000), “Inside Moscow's Kosovo Muddle,” Survival 42(1): 130–40.
Levy, Clifford J. (2008), “Russia Adopts Blustery Tone Set by Envoy,” New York Times, August 28.
Lo, Bobo (2002), Russian Foreign Policy in the Post-Soviet Era: Reality, Illusion and Mythmaking. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lukyanov, Fyodor (2004), “Final Act,” Vremya Novostei, July 9, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 56(27).
Lynch, Michael (1997), “Theorizing Practice,” Human Studies 20(3): 335–44.
MacFarlane, S. Neil (2008), “Russia, NATO Enlargement and the Strengthening of Democracy in the European Space,” in Braun, Aurel, ed., NATO–Russia Relations in the Twenty-First Century, 39–52. New York: Routledge.
Madsen, Mikael Rask (2007), “From Cold War Instrument to Supreme European Court: The European Court of Human Rights at the Crossroads of International and National Law and Politics,” Law and Social Inquiry 32(1): 137–59.
March, James G. and Olsen, Johan P. (1989), Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.
March, James G. and Olsen, Johan P. (1998), “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders,” International Organization 52(4): 943–69.
Marti, Eduardo (1996), “Mechanisms of Internalisation and Externalisation of Knowledge in Piaget's and Vygotsky's Theories,” in Tryphon, Anastasia and Vonèche, Jacques, eds., Piaget-Vygotsky: The Social Genesis of Thought, 57–83. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Mattern, Janice Bially (2001), “The Power Politics of Identity,” European Journal of International Relations 7(3): 349–97.
Mattern, Janice Bially (2005), Ordering International Politics: Identity, Crisis, and Representational Force. New York: Routledge.
McDonald, David (2007), “Domestic Conjunctures, the Russian State, and the World Outside, 1700–2006,” in Legvold, Robert, ed., Russian Foreign Policy in the Twenty-First Century and the Shadow of the Past, 145–203. New York: Columbia University Press.
MccGwire, Michael (1998), “NATO Expansion: ‘A Policy Error of Historic Importance,’” Review of International Studies 24(1): 23–42.
Mearsheimer, John J. (2001), The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
Mérand, Frédéric (2008), European Defense Policy: Beyond the Nation State. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mérand, Frédéric and Pouliot, Vincent (2008), “Le monde de Pierre Bourdieu: Éléments pour une théorie sociale des Relations internationales” (Pierre Bourdieu's World: Elements for a Social Theory of International Relations), Canadian Journal of Political Science 41(3): 603–25.
Mercer, Jonathan (1995), “Anarchy and Identity,” International Organization 49(2): 229–52.
Migranyan, Andranik (1994), “Russia's Foreign Policy: Disastrous Results of Three Years,” Nezavisimaya Gazeta, December 10, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 46(50).
Migranyan, Andranik (1997), “A Mistake or Not? Boris Yeltsin Will Sign Russia-NATO Treaty in Paris Today,” Nezavisimaya Gazeta, May 27, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 49(22).
Milliken, Jennifer (1999), “The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods,” European Journal of International Relations 5(2): 225–54.
,Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (2001), “Speech by President Putin of Russia before the Representatives of the American Public and US Political Figures,” Washington, November 13 (www.ln.mid.ru/bl.nsf/900b2c3ac91734634325698f002d9dcf/0472a5da92607d0543256b050031fe41?OpenDocument, accessed June 3, 2009).
,Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (2007a), “The Foreign Policy Sovereignty of Russia – An Absolute Imperative, article by Sergey Lavrov,” January 18 (www.ln.mid.ru/brp_4.nsf/e78a48070f128a7b43256999005bcbb3/4a94acbef393c22, accessed June 3, 2007).
,Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (2007b), “Transcript of Remarks and Replies to Media Questions by Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs, Sergey Lavrov Following Ministerial Meeting of Russia–NATO Council,” Oslo, April 26 (www.nato-russia-council.info/htm/EN/statements26apr07_3.shtml, accessed June 3, 2009).
Mitzen, Jennifer (2006), “Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma,” European Journal of International Relations 12(3): 341–70.
Morozov, Viatcheslav (2002), “Resisting Entropy, Discarding Human Rights: Romantic Realism and Securitization of Identity in Russia,” Cooperation and Conflict 37(4): 409–29.
Novosti, Moskovskiye (1996), “Primakov Starts with the CIS,” Moskovskiye Novosti, January 14, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 48(2).
Mukhin, Vladimir (1998), “Warning by Russian Defense Ministry,” Nezavisimaya Gazeta, June 23, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 50(25).
Myers, Steven Lee (2008), “Bush Supports Ukraine's Bid to Join NATO,” New York Times, April 2.
,NATO (1990), “Declaration on a Transformed North Atlantic Alliance Issued by the Heads of State and Government Participating in the Meeting of the North Atlantic Council,” London, July 6 (www.nato.int/docu/basictxt/b900706a.htm, accessed November 6, 2004).
,NATO (1994a), “Declaration of the Heads of State and Government Participating in the Meeting of the North Atlantic Council (‘The Brussels Summit Declaration’),” Brussels, January 11 (www.nato.int/docu/basictxt/b940111a.htm, accessed November 6, 2004).
,NATO (1994b), “Final Communiqué,” press communiqué M-NAC-1(94)46, Istanbul, June 9 (www.nato.int/docu/comm/49-95/c940609b.htm, accessed October 12, 2007).
,NATO (1994c), “Final Communiqué,” communiqué M-NAC-2(94)116, Brussels, December 1 (www.nato.int/docu/comm/49-95/c941201a.htm, accessed October 11, 2007).
,NATO (1995), “Study on NATO Enlargement,” September (www.nato.int/docu/basictxt/enl-9501.htm, accessed March 10, 2006).
,NATO (1997), “Founding Act on Mutual Relations, Cooperation and Security between NATO and the Russian Federation,” Paris, May 27 (www.nato.int/docu/basictxt/fndact-a.htm, accessed June 11, 2004).
,NATO (2001a), “Press Statement, Meeting in Extraordinary Session of the NATO-Russia Permanent Joint Council at Ambassadorial Level,” Brussels, September 13 (www.nato.int/docu/pr/2001/p010913e.htm, accessed October 18, 2007).
,NATO (2001b), “NATO–Russia: Sit Down and Discuss Where Our Interests Meet,” speech by Lord Robertson, NATO Secretary-General at the Moscow State Institute of Foreign Relations (MGIMO), February 21 (www.nato.int/docu/speech/2001/s010221a.htm, accessed December 2, 2007).
,NATO (2001c), “Press Conference with NATO Secretary-General, Lord Robertson,” Moscow, November 22 (www.nato.int/docu/speech/2001/s011122b.htm, accessed December 1, 2007).
,NATO (2002), “NATO–Russia Relations: A New Quality,” Rome, May 28 (www.nato.int/docu/basictxt/b020528e.htm, accessed June 3, 2009).
,NATO (2004a), “Joint NATO–Russia position on Ukraine,” December 9 (www.nato.int/docu/update/2004/12-december/e1209d.htm, accessed October 21, 2005).
,NATO (2004b), “The Istanbul Declaration: Our Security in a New Era,” Press release 2004(097), June 28 (www.nato.int/docu/pr/2004/p04– 097e.htm, accessed January 24, 2005).
,NATO (2006), “NATO-Russia News 2/06,” NATO Public Diplomacy Division.
,NATO (2007), “NATO-Russia: A Pragmatic Partnership,” NATO Public Diplomacy Division.
,NATO (2008a), “Bucharest Summit Declaration,” Bucharest, April 3 (www.nato.int/docu/pr/2208/p08-049e.html, accessed June 3, 2008).
,NATO (2008b), “Statement at the Meeting of the North Atlantic Council at the Level of Foreign Ministers held at NATO Headquarters, Brussels, on 19 August 2008,” press release (2008) 104 (www.nato.int/docu/pr/2008/p08-104e.html, accessed August 19, 2008).
Neufeld, Mark (1993), “Interpretation and the ‘Science’ of International Relations,” Review of International Studies 19(1): 39–61.
Neumann, Iver B. (1996), “Self and Other in International Relations,” European Journal of International Relations 2(2): 139–74.
Neumann, Iver B. (1999), Uses of the Other: “The East” in European Identity Formation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Neumann, Iver B. (2002), “Returning Practice to the Linguistic Turn: The Case of Diplomacy,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 31(3): 627–51.
Neumann, Iver B. (2004), “Beware of Organicism: The Narrative Self of the State,” Review of International Studies 30(2): 259–67.
Neumann, Iver B. (2005a), “To Be a Diplomat,” International Studies Perspective 6(1): 72–93.
Neumann, Iver B. (2005b), “Russia as a Great Power,” in Hedenskog, Jakob, Konnander, Vilhelm, Nygren, Bertil, Oldberg, Ingmar and Pursiainen, Christer, eds., Russia as a Great Power: Dimensions of Security under Putin, 13–28. New York: Routledge.
Neumann, Iver B. (2007), “A Speech That the Entire Ministry May Stand for,” or: Why Diplomats Never Produce Anything New,” International Political Sociology 1(2): 183–200.
Neumann, Iver B. (2008a) “Discourse Analysis,” in Klotz, Audie and Prakash, Deepa, eds., Qualitative Methods of International Relations: A Pluralist Guide, 61–77. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Neumann, Iver B. (2008b), “Russia as a Great Power, 1815–2007,” Journal of International Relations and Development 11(2): 128–51.
,New York Times (1994), “Include Russia, Too,” New York Times, January 9.
,New York Times (1997), “Former Enemies Speak of Peace,” New York Times, May 28.
,New York Times (2001), “Bush's Vision: ‘We Will Not Trade Away the Fate of Free European Peoples,” New York Times, June 16.
Nexon, Daniel H. (2009), The Struggle for Power in Early Modern Europe: Religious Conflict, Dynastic Empires and International Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
,Nezavisimaya Gazeta (1994), “Yeltsin on Partnership in NATO,” Nezavisimaya Gazeta, April 7, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 46(14).
Nicolson, Harold (1963 [1939]), Diplomacy, 3rd edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Norris, John (2005), Collision Course: NATO, Russia, and Kosovo. Westport, CN: Praeger.
O'Neill, Barry (1999), Honor, Symbols, and War. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Onuf, Nicholas (1998), “Constructivism: A User's Manual,” in Kubalkova, Vendulka, Onuf, Nicholas and Kowert, Paul, eds., International Relations in a Constructed World, 58–98. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Parkhomenko, Sergei (1993), “Russia Gives Poland Leave to Join NATO,” Sevodnya, August 27, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 45(34).
Paul, T. V. (2005), “Soft Balancing in the Age of U.S. Primacy,” International Security 30(1): 46–71.
Pierson, Paul (2004), Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
,PIPA (2002), Worldview 2002: American and European Public Opinion and Foreign Policy, The Chicago Council on Foreign Relations, (www.ccfr.org/globalviews2004/sub/pdf/2002_Comparative.pdf, accessed January 24, 2004).
Polanyi, Michael (1983), The Tacit Dimension. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.
Poleshchuk, Andrei (1993), “Is an Expansion of NATO Justified?” Nezavisimaya Gazeta, November 26, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 45(47).
Polkinghorne, Donald E. (1988), Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Ponsard, Lionel (2007), Russia, NATO and Cooperative Security: Bridging the Gap. New York: Routledge.
Pop, Liliana (2007), “Time and Crisis: Framing Success and Failure in Romania's Post-communist Transformations,” Review of International Studies 33(3): 395–413.
Pouliot, Vincent (2003), “La Russie et la communauté atlantique. Vers une culture commune de sécurité” (Russia and the Atlantic Community: Toward a Common Security Culture?), Études internationales 34(1): 25–51.
Pouliot, Vincent (2004), “The Essence of Constructivism,” Journal of International Relations and Development 7(3): 319–36.
Pouliot, Vincent (2006), “The Alive and Well Transatlantic Security Community: A Theoretical Reply to Michael Cox,” European Journal of International Relations and Development 12(1): 119–27.
Pouliot, Vincent (2007), “Pacification Without Collective Identification: Russia and the Transatlantic Security Community in the Post-Cold War Era,” Journal of Peace Research 44(5): 603–20.
Pouliot, Vincent (2008), “Reflexive Mirror: Everything Takes Place As If Threats Were Going Global,” in Kornprobst, Markus, Pouliot, Vincent, Shah, Nisha and Zaiotti, Ruben, eds., Metaphors of Globalization: Mirrors, Magicians, and Mutinies, 34–49. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pouliot, Vincent (n.d.), “The Materials of Practice: Nuclear Warheads, Rhetorical Commonplaces and Committee Meetings in NATO-Russia Diplomacy,” paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, August 2008.
Pouliot, Vincent and Lachmann, Niels (2004), “Les communautés de sécurité, vecteurs d'ordre régional et international” (Security Communities as Vehicles of Regional and International Order), Revue internationale et stratégique 54: 131–40.
,President of Russia (2001), “Annual Address to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation,” Moscow, April 3 (www.kremlin.ru/eng/text/speeches/2001/04/03/0000_type70029type82912_70660.shtml, accessed June 5, 2007).
,President of Russia (2007), “Speech and the Following Discussion at the Munich Conference on Security Policy,” Munich, February 10 (www.president.kremlin.ru/eng/text/speeches/2007/02/10/0138, accessed April 4, 2007).
,President of Russia (2008), “Speech at the Meeting with Russian Ambassadors and Permanent Representatives to International Organisations,” Moscow, July 15 (http://kremlin.ru/eng/text/speeches/2008/07/15/1121_type82912 type84779_204155.shtml, accessed July 16, 2008).
Price, Richard and Reus-Smit, Christian (1998), “Dangerous Liaisons? Critical International Theory and Constructivism,” European Journal of International Relations 4(3): 259–94.
Primakov, Yevgeny (2004), Russian Crossroads: Toward the New Millennium. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Primakov, Yevgeny (2006), “Russia and the U.S. in Need of Trust and Cooperation,” Russia in Global Affairs, February 8 (eng.globalaffairs.ru/number/14/1005.html, accessed April 5, 2006).
Pushkov, Aleksei (1999), “The Chernomyrdin Syndrome,” Nezavisimaya Gazeta, June 11, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 51(23).
Pushkov, Aleksei (2004), “The Aim Is Not to Divide Ukraine, But to Break It Away from Russia,” Trud, December 1, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 56(48).
Reber, Arthur S. (1993), Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge: An Essay on the Cognitive Unconscious. New York: Oxford University Press.
Reus-Smit, Christian (1997), The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ricoeur, Paul (1977 [1973]), “The Model of the Text: Meaningful Action Considered as a Text,” in Dallmayr, Fred R. and McCarthy, Thomas A., eds., Understanding and Social Inquiry, 316–34. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Ringmar, Erik (1996), Identity, Interest and Action: A Cultural Explanation of Sweden's Intervention in the Thirty Years War. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Risse, Thomas (2000), “‘Let's Argue!’: Communicative Action in World Politics,” International Organization 54(1): 1–39.
Rodin, Ivan (1994), “NATO's Program Is Not Entirely to the Liking of the State Duma,” Nezavisimaya Gazeta, March 18, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 46(11).
Rodionov, Igor (1996), “What Sort of Defense Does Russia Need?” Nezavisimoye Voyennoye Obozreniye, November 28, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 48(50).
,Rossiiskaya Gazeta (1996), “Let's Leave Nuclear Ambitions to the History Books,” Rossiiskaya Gazeta, September 26, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 48(39).
,Rossiiskaya Gazeta (1997), “Cooperation Instead of Confrontation,” Rossiiskaya Gazeta, March 18, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 49(11).
,Rossiiskaya Gazeta (1999), “NATO Seeks to Enter 21st Century Wearing the Uniform of World Policeman,” Rossiiskaya Gazeta, March 26, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 51(12).
Vesti, Rossiiskiye (1995), “Abandon Reflexive Resort to Force in Favor of Considered Approach,” Rossiiskiye Vesti, September 8, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 47(36).
Rubin, Herbert J. and Rubin, Irene S. (1995), Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rudolph, Susan Hoeber (2004), “Toward Convergence,” in Shapiro, Ian, Smith, Rogers M., and Masoud, Tarek E., eds., Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics, 385–88. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ruggie, John G. (1998), Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization. New York: Routledge.
Ryle, Gilbert (1984), The Concept of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Satow, Ernest Mason (1979), Satow's Guide to Diplomatic Practice, 5th edition. London: Longman.
Schatz, Edward (2009a), “Ethnographic Immersion and the Study of Politics,” in Schatz, Edward, ed., Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power, 1–22. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schatz, Edward (2009b), “What Kind(s) of Ethnography Does Political Science Need,” in Schatz, Edward, ed., Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power, 303–18. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schatzki, Theodore R. (2005), “Practices and Actions: A Wittgensteinian Critique of Bourdieu and Giddens,” in Robbins, Derek, ed., Pierre Bourdieu 2, 167–191. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Schatzki, Theodore R., Cetina, Karin Knorr and Savigny, Eike, eds. (2001), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. New York: Routledge.
Schelling, Thomas C. (1980 [1960]), The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schimmelfennig, Frank (2001), “The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union,” International Organization 55(1): 47–80.
Schimmelfennig, Frank (2003), The EU, NATO and the Integration of Europe: Rules and Rhetoric. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schmidt, William E. (1994), “Russia Clarifies Hopes for a Link with NATO,” New York Times, May 26.
Scott, James C. (1998), Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Searle, John R (1995), The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press.
Searle, John R (1998), Mind, Language and Society: Philosophy in the Real World. New York: Basic Books.
Sending, Ole Jacob (2002), “Constitution, Choice and Change: Problems with the ‘Logic of Appropriateness’ and Its Use in Constructivist Theory,” European Journal of International Relations 8(4): 443–70.
Shannon, Vaughn P. (2000), “Norms Are What States Make of Them: The Political Psychology of Norm Violation,” International Studies Quarterly 44(2): 293–316.
Sharp, Paul and Wiseman, Geoffrey, eds. (2007), The Diplomatic Corps as an Institution of International Society. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Shegedin, Aleksandr and Zygar, Mikhail (2006), “Estonia Turns Its Defense Side to Russia,” Kommersant, December 7, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 58(49).
Shevtsov, Leontiy P. (1997), “Russian-NATO Military Cooperation in Bosnia: A Basis for the Future?NATO Review 45(2): 17–21.
Smirnov, Aleksei (2002), “Russia Is Given a Place in a Dying Alliance,” Noviye Izvestia, May 16, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 54(20).
Solovyov, Vladimir and Sidorov, Dmitry (2006), “Sanction Master,” Kommersant, October 4, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 58(40).
Stankevich, Sergei (1992), “Russia Has Already Made an Anti-imperial Choice,” Nezavisimaya Gazeta, November 6, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 44(45).
Stanovich, Keith E. and West, Richard F. (2000), “Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate?Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23(5): 645–726.
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer (2002), “Realism and the Constructivist Challenge: Rejecting, Reconstructing, or Rereading,” International Studies Review 4(1): 73–97.
Straus, Ira (2003), “NATO: The Only West That Russia Has?Demokratizatsiya 11(2): 229–69.
Sysoyev, Gennady (1998), “Russian Assault Force Lands in Albania,” Kommersant, August 18, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 50(33).
Sysoyev, Gennady (2004), “Minister Gets Job Done at Highest Level,” Kommersant, June 30, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 56(26).
Swidler, Ann (2001), “What Anchors Cultural Practices,” in Schatzki, Theodore R., Cetina, Karin Knorr and Savigny, Eike, eds., The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, 74–92. New York: Routledge.
Talbott, Strobe (1995), “Why NATO Should Grow,” New York Review of Books, August 10: 27.
Talbott, Strobe (2002), The Russia Hand: A Memoir of Presidential Diplomacy. New York: Random House.
Taylor, Charles (1993 [1981]), “To Follow a Rule …” in Calhoun, Craig, LiPuma, Edward and Postone, Moishe, eds., Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives, 45–59. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Thomas, Daniel C. (2001), The Helsinki Effect: International Norms, Human Rights, and the Demise of Communism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Tilly, Charles (1985), “War Making and State Making as Organized Crime,” in Evans, Peter B., Rueschemeyer, Dietrich and Skocpol, Theda, eds., Bringing the State Back In, 169–91. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Toulmin, Stephen (2001), Return to Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Trachtenberg, Marc (2006), The Craft of International History: A Guide to Method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Traynor, Ian (2002), “Russia and Nato Reach Historic Deal,” Guardian, May 15.
Trenin, Dmitri (2000), “Russia's Security Relations with the West after Kosovo and Chechnya,” Notes de l'IFRI 19.
Trenin, Dmitri (2005), “Russia's Security Integration with America and Europe,” in Motyl, Alexander J., Ruble, Blair A. and Shevtsova, Lilia, eds., Russia's Engagement with the West: Transformation and Integration in the Twenty-first Century, 281–94. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Tsebelis, George (1990), Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Tsygankov, Andrei P. (2001), “The Final Triumph of the Pax Americana? Western Intervention in Yugoslavia and Russia's Debate on the Post-Cold War Order,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 34(2): 133–56.
Tsygankov, Andrei P. (2003), “Mastering Space in Eurasia: Russia's Geopolitical Thinking after the Soviet Break-up,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 36(1): 101–27.
Tsygankov, Andrei P. (2004), Whose World Order? Russia's Perception of American Ideas after the Cold War. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Tsygankov, Andrei P. (2005), “Vladimir Putin's Vision of Russia as a Normal Great Power,” Post-Soviet Affairs 21(2): 132–58.
Turner, Stephen (1994), The Social Theory of Practices: Tradition, Tacit Knowledge, and Presuppositions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
,UN Security Council (1993), “Resolution 836,” S/RES/836(1993), June 4.
,UN Security Council (1998a), “Resolution 1199 (1998),” S/RES/1199, September 23.
,UN Security Council (1998b), “3937th Meeting, Saturday, 24 October 1998, 4.15 p.m, New York,” S/PV.3937.
,US Department of State (2004), “The NATO–Russia Council: A Vital Partnership in the War on Terror,” remarks by R. Nicholas Burns, Moscow, November 8 (www.state.gov/p/eur/rls/rm/38244.htm, accessed April 2, 2007).
,US Department of State (2006), “Discussion on Russia/G8 issues,” Washington, April 19 (www.state.gov/p/eur/rls/rm/65206.htm, accessed September 26, 2006).
Vaughn, Diane (2008), “Bourdieu and Organizations: The Empirical Challenge,” Theory and Society 37(1): 65–81.
Villumsen, Trine (2008), “Theory as Practice and Capital: NATO in a Bourdieusian Field of Security in Europe: Toward a Sociological Approach to IR.” PhD dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen.
Wacquant, Loïc J. D. (1992), “Toward a Social Praxeology: The Structure and Logic of Bourdieu's Sociology,” in Bourdieu, Pierre and Wacquant, Loïc J. D., An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, 1–59. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wacquant, Loïc J. D. (1995), “The Pugilistic Point of View: How Boxers Think and Feel about Their Trade,” Theory and Society 24(4): 489–535.
Wæver, Ole (1998), “Insecurity, Security, and Asecurity in the West European Non-War Community,” in Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael, eds., Security Communities, 69–118. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Waltz, Kenneth N. (1979), Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Watkins, Susan Cotts and Swidler, Ann (2006), “Hearsay Ethnography: Capturing Collective Life,” CCPR-007–06, University of California, Los Angeles.
Watson, Adam (1991), Diplomacy: The Dialogue Between States. New York: Routledge.
Welch, David A. (2005), Painful Choices: A Theory of Foreign Policy Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Welch Larson, Deborah and Shevchenko, Alexei (2003), “Shortcut to Greatness: The New Thinking and the Revolution in Soviet Foreign Policy,” International Organization 57(1): 77–109.
Weldes, Jutta (1999), Constructing National Interests: The United States and the Cuban Missile Crisis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Wendt, Alexander (1998), “On Constitution and Causation in International Relations,” Review of International Studies 24 (special issue): 101–17.
Wendt, Alexander (1999), Social Theory of International Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wendt, Alexander (2004), “The State as Person in International Theory,” Review of International Studies 30(2): 289–316.
Wendt, Alexander (2006), “Social Theory as Cartesian Science: An Auto-Critique from a Quantum Perspective,” in Guzzini, Stefano and Leander, Anna, eds., Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and His Critics, 181–219. New York: Routledge.
Wenger, Etienne (1998), Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
White, Stephen (2006), “Russia and ‘Europe’: The Public Dimension,” in Allison, Roy, Light, Margot and White, Stephen, Putin's Russia and the Enlarged Europe, 130–59. Oxford: Blackwell.
White, Stephen, Korosteleva, Julia and Allison, Roy (2006), “NATO: The View from the East,” European Security 15(2): 165–90.
White, Stephen, Light, Margot and McAllister, Ian (2005), “Russia and the West: Is There a Values Gap?International Politics 42(3): 314–33.
Williams, Michael C. (2001), “The Discipline of the Democratic Peace: Kant, Liberalism, and the Social Construction of Security Communities,” European Journal of International Relations 7(4): 525–53.
Williams, Michael C. (2007), Culture and Security: Symbolic Power and the Politics of International Security. New York: Routledge.
Williams, Michael C. and Neumann, Iver B. (2000), “From Alliance to Security Community: NATO, Russia, and the Power of Identity,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 29(2): 357–87.
Williams, Peter (2005), “NATO-Russia Military Cooperation: From Dialogue to Interoperability?RUSI Journal 150(5): 44–7.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1958), Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wohlforth, William C. (2009), “Unipolarity, Status Competition, and Great Power War,” World Politics 61(1): 28–57.
Wörner, Manfred (1991), “The Atlantic Alliance in a New Era,” NATO Review 39(1): 3–8.
Yost, David (1998), “The New NATO and Collective Security,” Survival 40(2): 135–60.
Yusin, Maksim (1993), “On Eve of Dec. 12 Elections, NATO Gives Yeltsin Unpleasant Surprise,” Izvestia, December 10, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 45(49).
Yusin, Maksim (2001), “Havel Takes Zyuganov's Path,” Izvestia, November 29, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 53(48).
Zehfuss, Maja (2002), Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zerubavel, Eviatar (1997), Social Mindscapes: An Invitation to Cognitive Sociology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zimmerman, William (2002), The Russian People and Foreign Policy: Russian Elite and Mass Perspectives, 1993–2000. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed