Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 9
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
July 2009
Print publication year:
2007
Online ISBN:
9780511498695

Book description

This book explores two basic questions regarding constitutional theory. First, in view of a commitment to democratic self-rule and widespread disagreement on questions of value, how is the creation of a legitimate constitutional regime possible? Second, what must be true about a constitution if the regime that it supports is to retain its claim to legitimacy? Howard Schweber shows that the answers to these questions appear in a theory of constitutional language that combines democratic theory with constitutional philosophy. The creation of a legitimate constitutional regime depends on a shared commitment to a particular and specialized form of language. Out of this simple observation, Schweber develops arguments about the characteristics of constitutional language, the necessary differences between constitutional language and the language of ordinary law or morality, as well as the authority of officials such as judges to engage in constitutional review of laws.

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

Bibliography
Bibliography
Aarsleff, Hans. From Locke to Saussure: Essays on the Study of Language in Intellectual History. London, 1982.
Aarsleff, Hans. “The State of Nature and the Nature of Man in Locke.” In John Locke: Problems and Perspectives, ed. Yolton, John. Cambridge, 1969: 99–136.
Ackerman, Bruce. We the People: Tranformations. Cambridge, MA, 1992.
Ackerman, Bruce. We The People: Foundations. Cambridge, MA, 1993.
Adler, Matthew D.Expressive Theories of Law: A Skeptical Overview.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 148 (2000): 1363–1450.
Aeschylus. The Oresteia, Fagles, Robert, trans. New York, 1977.
Alexander, Lawrence, ed. Constitutionalism. Cambridge, 2001.
Alexy, Robert. “The Nature of Arguments About the Nature of Law.” In Rights, Culture, and the Law: Themes from the Legal and Political Philosophy of Joseph Raz, eds. Meyer, Lukas H., Paulson, Stanley L., and Pogge, Thomas W.. Oxford, 2003: 3–16.
Alexy, Robert. The Argument From Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism. Oxford, 2002.
Amar, Akhil Reed. America's Constitution: A Biography. New York, 2005.
Amar, Akhil Reed. “Popular Sovereignty and Constitutional Amendment.” In Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, 1995a: 89–115.
Amar, Akhil Reed. “Presidents, Vice-Presidents, and Death: Closing the Constitution's Succession Gap.” Arkansas Law Review 48 (1995b): 215–38.
Amar, Akhil Reed. “The Consent of the Governed: Constitutional Amendment Outside Article V.” Columbia Law Review 94 (1994): 457–508.
Amar, Akhil Reed. “Philadelphia Revisited: Amending the Constitution Outside Article V.” University of Chicago Law Review 55 (1988): 1043–1103.
Ames, William. Conscience With the Power and Cases Therof. London, 1639.
Anderson, Elizabeth S., and Pildes, Richard H.. “Expressive Theories of Law: A General Restatement.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 148 (2000): 1503–75.
Appleby, Joyce. “Locke, Liberalism and the Natural Law of Money.” Past and Present 71 (1976): 43–69.
Aristotle. The Politics and the Constitution of Athens, ed. Everson, Stephen, trans. Benjamin Jowett. Cambridge, 2004.
Ashcraft, Richard, ed. John Locke: Critical Assessments, 4 vols. New York, 1991.
Ashcraft, Richard. “Revolutionary Politics and Locke's Two Treatises of Government: Radicalism and Lockean Political Theory.” Political Theory 8 (November 1980): 429–86.
Ashworth, E. J. “Locke on Language,” 14 Canadian Journal of Philosophy”14 (1984): 45–73. Reprinted in John Locke: Critical Assessments, ed. Richard Ashcraft, vol. 1. New York, 1991:235–59.
Austin, John. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. New York, 2000.
Ayoub, M.Translating the Meaning of the Quran: Traditional Opinions and Modern Debates.” Afkar Inquiry 3 (May 1986): 34–9.
Balkin, Jack. “Fidelity in Constitutional Theory: Does the Constitution Deserve Our Fidelity?: Agreements with Hell and Other Objects of Our Faith.” Fordham Law Review 65 (1997): 1703–38.
Barber, Sotirios A. “Notes on Constitutional Maintenance.” In Constitutional Politics: Essays on Constitution Making, Maintenance, and Change, eds. Barber, Sotiros A. and George, Robert P.. Princeton, 2001: 162–66.
Barber, Sotirios A.On What the Constitution Means. Baltimore, 1984.
Barnett, Randy E.Constitutional Legitimacy.” Columbia Law Review 103 (2003): 111–48.
Beardsworth, Richard. Derrida and the Political. London, 1996.
Bellamy, Richard. “The Political Form of the Constitution: The Separation of Powers, Rights and Representative Democracy.” In Constitutions in Transformation: European and Theoretical Perspectives, eds. Bellamy, Richard and Castiglione, Dario. Oxford, 1996: 24–44.
Benhabib, Seyla. “Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy.” In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. Benhabib, . Princeton, 1996: 3–18.
Berlin, Isaiah. Liberty. Oxford, 2002.
Berman, Harold J.The Origins of Historical Jurisprudence: Coke, Selden, Hale.” Yale Law Journal 103 (1994): 1651–1738.
Bickel, Alexander M.The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. New Haven, 1986.
Blackstone, William. Commentaries on the Laws of England, 4 vols, facs. ed. Katz, Stanley N.. Chicago, 1979.
Bobbitt, Phillip. Constitutional Interpretation. Oxford, 1991.
Bobbitt, Phillip. Constitutional Fate. Oxford, 1982.
Bodin, Jean. The Six Books of a Commonwealth [1606], ed. McRae, Kenneth Douglas, facs. of trans. Richard Knolles. Cambridge, MA, 1962.
Bork, Robert. “The Judge's Role in Law and Culture.” Ave Maria Law Review 1 (2003): 19–29.
Bork, Robert. The Tempting of America: the Political Seduction of the Law. New York, 1990.
Boyd, Richard. “The Calvinist Origins of Lockean Political Economy.” History of Political Thought 23 (2002): 30–60.
Brand-Ballard, Jeffrey. “Kelsen's Unstable Alternative to Natural Law: Recent Critiques.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 41 (1996): 133–64.
Brandon, Mark E. “Constitutionalism and Constitutional Failure.” In Constitutional Politics: Essays on Constitution Making, Maintenance, and Change, eds. Barber, Sotirios A. and George, Robert P.. Princeton, 2001: 298–313.
Brandon, Mark E.Free in the World: American Slavery and Constitutional Failure. Princeton, 1998.
Browne, Thomas. Religio Medici. London, 1643.
Brewer, David J. “An Independent Judiciary as the Salvation of the Nation,” (1893). Reprinted in The Annals of America: Agrarianism and Urbanization 1884–1894, vol. 11 (Chicago, 1968: 423–30).
Byrne, James. “The Basis of Natural Law in Locke's Philosophy.” Catholic Lawyer10 (1964): 55–63. Reprinted in John Locke: Critical Assessments, vol. 2, ed. Richard Ashcraft. New York, 1991: 52–62.
Cardozo, Benjamin. The Nature of the Judicial Process. Boston, 1921.
Castiglione, Dario. “The Political Theory of the Constitution.” In The Constitution in Transformation: European and Theoretical Perspectives, eds. Bellamy, Richard and Castiglione. Oxford, 1996: 417–35
Carroll, Lewis. Alice in Wonderland.
Cohen, Joshua. “Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy.” In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. Benhabib, . Princeton, 1996: 95–119.
Cohen, Barak. “Empowering Constitutionalism with Text from an Israeli Perspective.” American University International Law Review 18 (2003): 585–650.
Cohen, Joshua. “Structure, Choice and Legitimacy: Locke's Theory of the State.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 15 (1986): 301–24.
Coleman, Jules. The Practice of Principle: In Defense of a Pragmatist Approach to Legal Theory. Oxford, 2001.
Coleman, Jules. “Authority and Reason.” In The Autonomy of Law:Essays on Legal Positivism, ed. George, Robert P.. Oxford, 1996: 287–319.
Coleman, Jules, and Leiter, Brian. “Determinacy, Objectivity, and Authority.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 142 (1993): 549–637.
Cover, Robert. “Violence and the Word.” Yale Law Journal 95 (1986): 1601–29.
Cover, Robert. “The Supreme Court, 1982 Term – Foreword: Nomos and Narrative.” Harvard. Law Review 97 (1983): 4–68.
Cover, Robert. Justice Accused: Antislavery and the Judicial Process. New Haven, 1975.
Croly, Stephen P.The Majoritarian Difficulty: Elective Judiciaries and the Rule of Law.” University of Chicago Law Review 62 (1995): 689–791.
Culler, Jonathan. On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism After Structuralism. Ithaca, NY, 1982.
Curry, Thomas J.The First Freedoms. Oxford, 1986.
Dawson, Hannah, “Locke on Private Language,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2003): 609–38.
Denning, Brian. “Means to Amend: Theories of Constitutional Change.” Tennessee Law Review 65 (1997): 155–244.
Derrida, Jacques. “The Force of Law: The ‘Mystical Foundation of Authority.’Cardozo Law Review (1990): 920–1045.
Derrida, Jacques. Writing and Difference. Chicago, 1978.
Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology, trans. Gayatri Spivak. Baltimore, 1974.
Dewey, John. “Substance, Power and Quality in Locke.” Philosophical Reviews 35 (1926): 22–38.
Dicey, A. B.Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 7th ed. London, 1908.
Dorf, Michael C.Legal Indeterminacy and Institutional Design.” New York University Law Review 78 (2003): 875–981.
Dow, David R. “The Plain Meaning of Article V.” In Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, 1995: 117–44.
Dow, David R.When Words Mean What We Believe They Say: The Case of Article V.” Iowa Law Review 76 (1990): 1–66.
Dunn, John. The Political Thought of John Locke: An Historical Account of the Argument of the Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge, 1982.
Dunn, John. “Consent in the Political Theory of John Locke,” Historical Journal 10 (1967): 153–82.
Dworkin, Ronald. Law's Empire. Cambridge, MA, 1986.
Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA, 1977.
Eisgruber, Christopher. Constitutional Self-Government. Cambridge, MA, 2001.
Eisgruber, Christopher. “Judicial Supremacy and Constitutional Distortion.” In Constitutional Politics: Essays on Constitution Making, Maintenance, and Change, eds. Barber, Sotirios and George, Robert P.. Princeton, 2001: 70–90.
Eisgruber, Christopher L., and Sager, Lawrence G.. “Why the Religious Freedom Restoration Act Is Unconstitutional.” New York University Law Review 69 (1994): 437–76.
Eleftheriadis, Pavlos. “The European Constitution and Cosmopolitan Ideals.” 7 Columbia Journal of European Law (2001): 21–39.
Elster, John. Ulysses Unbound: Studies in Rationality, Precommitments, and Constraints. Cambridge, 2000.
Elster, John. Ulysses and the Sirens. Cambridge, 1984.
Erikson, Erik Oddvar, and Fossum, Jon. “Europe in Search of Legitimacy: Strategies of Legitimation Assessed.” International Political Science Review 25 (2004): 435–59.
Farber, Daniel A., and Sherry, Suzanna. Desparately Seeking Certainty: the Misguided Quest for Constitutional Foundations. Chicago, 2004.
Farr, James. “The Americanization of Hermeneutics: Francis Lieber's Legal and Political Hermeneutics.” In Legal Hermeneutics:History, Theory, and Practice, ed. Leyh, Gregory. Berkeley, 1992: 83–102.
Ferrajoli, Luigi. “Beyond Sovereignty and Citizenship: A Global Constitutionalism.” In Constitutionalism, Democracy and Sovereignty: American and European Perspectives, ed. Bellamy, Richard. Aldershot, 1997: 151–59.
Fineman, Martha Albertson. “Cracking the Foundational Myths: Independence, Autonomy, and Self-Sufficiency.” American University Journal of Gender, Society, Politics and Law 8 (2000): 13–29.
Finn, John E. “The Civic Constitution: Some Preliminaries.” In Constitutional Politics: Essays on Constitution Making, Maintenance, and Change, eds. Barber, Sotirios A. and George, Robert P.. Princeton, 2001: 41–69.
Finnis, John. “Law and What I Truly Should Decide.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 48 (2003): 107–29.
Finnis, John. “The Truth of Legal Positivism.” In The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism, ed. George, Robert P.. Oxford, 1996: 195–214.
Finnis, John. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford, 1980.
Fish, Stanley. There's No Such Thing as Free Speech, and it's a Good Thing, Too. Oxford, 1994.
Fisher, Louis. Religious Liberty in America: Political Safeguards. Lawrence, KA, 2002.
Franklin, Julian H. “Introduction.” Jean Bodin, On Sovereignty. Cambridge, 2003: ix–xxvi.
Freeman, Samuel. “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited: Public Reason and Political Justifications.” Fordham Law Review 72 (2004): 2021–72.
Fuller, Lon L.The Morality of Law. Cambridge, MA: 1969.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. Cambridge, MA, 1975.
Gauthier, David. “Hobbes' Social Contract.” Noûs 22 (1988): 71–82.
Gauthier, David. “Thomas Hobbes: Moral Theorist.” Journal of Philosophy 76 (1979): 547–59.
George, Robert P. “Justice, Legitimacy, and Allegiance: ‘The End of Democracy?’ Symposium Revisited.” In Constitutional Politics:Essays on Constitution Making, Maintenance, and Change, eds. Barber, Sotirios A. and George, Robert P.. Princeton, 2001: 314–28.
Goldie, Mark, “Introduction.” In John Locke, Political Essays, ed. Goldie, . Cambridge, 1997: xi–xxvii.
Goldstein, Leslie. “Popular Sovereignty, The Origins of Judicial Review, and the Revival of Unwritten Law.” Journal of Politics 48 (1986): 51–71.
Graber, Mark. Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil (unpublished ms., Cambridge University Press, forthcoming).
Grant, Ruth. John Locke's Liberalism. Chicago, 1987.
Green, Leslie. “Law, Legitimacy and Consent,” Southern California Law Review 62 (1989): 795–825.
Greenawalt, Kent. “Too Thin and Too Rich, Distinguishing Features of Legal Positivism.” In The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism, ed. George, Robert P.. Oxford, 1996: 1–30.
Greenawalt, Kent. “The Religious Voice in the Public Square: Religious Expression in the Public Square – The Building Blocks for an Intermediate Position.” Loyola Law Review 29 (1996): 1411–20.
Greenawalt, Kent. “Religious Convictions and Lawmaking.” Michigan Law Review 84 (1985): 352–404.
Griffin, Stephen M. “Constitutionalism in the United States: From Theory to Politics.” In Responding to Imperfection: the Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, 1995: 37–61.
Griffin, Stephen M.The Nominee is … Article V.” Constitutional Commentary 12 (1995): 171–73.
Habermas, Jürgen. The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory, eds. Cronin, Ciaran and Greiff, Pablo. Cambridge, MA, 2000.
Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms, trans. William Rehg. Cambridge, MA, 1999.
Habermas, Jürgen. Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston, 1972.
Harris, William F., II. The Interpretable Constitution. Baltimore, 1993.
Harris, William F., II. “Bonding Word and Polity: The Logic of American Constitutionalism.” American Political Science Review 76 (1982): 34–45.
Hart, H. L. A.The Concept of Law, 2nd ed. Oxford, 1997.
Hayek, Frierich A.The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago, 1978.
Hayes, Peter. “Hobbes's Silent Fool: A Response to Hoekstra.” Political Theory 27 (1999): 225–29.
Hirschl, Ran. “‘Negative’ Rights Versus ‘Positive’ Entitlements: A Comparative Study of Judicial Interpretations of Rights in an Emerging Neo-Liberal Economic Order.” Human Rights Quarterly 22 (2000): 1060–98.
Hirschmann, Albert. The Passions and the Interests : Political Arguments for Capitalism Before Its Triumph. Princeton, 1977.
Hobbes, Thomas. On the Citizen [1642], eds. Tuck, Richard and Silverthorne, Michael. Cambridge, 1998.
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan [1651], ed. Tuck, Richard. Cambridge, 1996.
Hoekstra, Kinch. “Nothing to Declare?: Hobbes and the Advocate of Injustice.” Political Theory 27 (1999): 230–35.
Hoekstra, Kinch. “Hobbes and the Fool.” Political Theory 25 (1997): 620–54.
Holmes, Stephen. Passions and Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago, 1995.
Jyranki, Antero. “Transferring Powers of a Nation State to International Organisations: The Doctrine of Sovereignty Revisited.” In National Constitutions in the Era of Integration, ed. Jyranki, . The Hague, 1999: 61–81.
Kahn, Paul. Legitimacy and History : Self-Government in American Constitutional Theory. New Haven, 1995.
Katz, Elai. “On Amending Constitutions: The Legality and Legitimacy of Constitutional Entrenchment.” Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems 29 (1996): 251–92.
Kavka, Gregory. Hobbesian Moral and Political Theory. Princeton, 1986.
Kay, Richard S. “American Constitutionalism.” Constitutionalism, ed. Alexander, Larry. Cambridge, 2001: 16–63.
Keller, Evelyn Fox and Longino, Helen E., eds. Feminism and Science. Oxford, 1999.
Kelsen, Hans. “The Function of a Constitution,” trans. Iain Stewart. Essays on Kelsen, eds. Tur, Richard and Twining, William. Oxford, 1986: 109–19.
Kelsen, Hans. Pure Theory of Law, trans. Max Knight. Berkeley, 1967.
Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Law and State, trans. Anders Wedberg. Cambridge, MA, 1945.
Kennedy, Duncan. ‘A Semiotics of Critique.” 22 Cardozo Law Review (2001): 1147–86.
Kennedy, Duncan. A Critique of Adjudication (Fin de Siècle). Cambridge, MA, 1998.
Kenyon, J. P., Stuart England. London, 1985.
Kerber, Linda. No Constitutional Right to be Ladies: Women and the Obligations of Citizenship. New York, 1999.
Kerber, Linda K.No Constitutional Right to be Ladies: Women and the Obligations of Citizenship. New York, 1998.
King, Brett. “Wild Political Dreaming: Historical Context, Popular Sovereignty, and Supermajority Rules.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 2 (2000): 609–61.
Klarman, Michael. “Majoritarian Judicial Review: The Entrenchment Problem.” Georgetown Law Journal 85 (1997): 491–553.
Kokott, Juliane. “Federal States in Federal Europe: The German Lander and Problems of European Integration.” National Constitutions in the Era of Integration, ed. Jyranki, Antero. The Hague, 1999: 175–200.
Kramer, Larry. The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review. Oxford, 2004a.
Kramer, Larry. “Popular Constitutionalism, circa 2004.” California Law Review 92 (2004b): 959–1011.
Kramer, Matthew. John Locke and the Origins of Private Property:Philosophical Explorations of Individualism, Community, and Equality. Cambridge, 1997.
Kramnick, Isaac. Bolingbroke and His Circle: The Politics of Nostalgia in the Age of Walpole. Cambridge, MA, 1968.
Lamprecht, Sterling, “Locke's attack upon innate ideas,” 36 Philosophical Review (1927): 145–65.
Laslett, Peter. “Introduction.” In Locke: Two Treatises on Government, ed. Laslett, . Cambridge, 1988: 3–126.
Laslett, Peter. “The English Revolution and Locke's Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge Historical Journal 12 (1956): 40–55.
Leiter, Brian. “Beyond the Hart/Dworkin Debate: The Methodology Problem in Jurisprudence.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 48 (2003): 17–51.
Lessig, Lawrence. “The Regulation of Social Meaning.” University of Chicago Law Review 62 (1995): 943–1045.
Levinson, Sanford. “The Political Implications of Amending Clauses.” Constitutional Commentary 13 (1996): 107–23.
Levinson, Sanford. “How Many Times Has the United States Constitution Been Amended? (A) <26; (B) 26; C) 27; (D) > 27: Accounting for Constitutional Change.” In Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, ed. Levinson, . Princeton, 1995: 13–36.
Leyden, William. “John Locke and Natural Law.” Philosophy 21 (1956): 23–35.
Leyh, Gregory. “Legal Education and the Public Life.” In Legal Hermeneutics: History, Theory and Practice, ed. Leyh, Berkeley, 1992: 269–94.
Li, Andrew I-kang. 2002. “A prototype simulated interactive shape grammar.” In Design e-ducation: connecting the real and the virtual. Proceedings of the 20th conference on education in computer aided architectural design in Europe, eds. Koszewski, Krzysztof and Wrona, Stefan. Warsaw, 2002: 314–17.
Li, A3drew I-kang. “Why do Chinese buildings have curved roofs? A first look at intellectual bias in the study of Chinese architecture. (Revised version.)” In Conference proceedings: Architecture, (Post)modernity, and Difference. Singapore, 1993: 48–51.
Lieber, Francis. Legal and Philosophical Hermeneutics: Principles of Interpretation and Construction in Law and Politics. New York, 1837.
Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government [1689], ed. Laslett, Peter. Cambridge, 1988.
Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding [1689], ed. Nidditch, Peter H.. Oxford, 1982.
Locke, John. “Essays on the Law of Nature [circa 1664].” In Locke, Political Essays, ed. Goldie, Mark. Cambridge, 1997: 79–133.
Luhmann, Gerald. “Operational Closure and Structural Coupling: The Differentiation of a Legal System.” Cardozo Law Review 13 (1992): 1419–41.
MacCormick, Neil. Questioning Sovereignty: Law, State and Nation in the European Commonwealth. Oxford, 1999.
MacCormick, Neil. “The Concept of Law and The Concept of Law.” In The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism, ed. George, Robert P.. Oxford, 1996: 163–94.
Madigan, James. “The Idea of Public Reason Resuscitated.” William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal 10 (2002): 719–78.
Madison, James, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay. The Federalist Papers, ed. Kramnick, Isaac. New York, 1788/1987.
Magarian, Gregory P.How to Apply the Religious Freedom Restoration Act to Federal Law Without Violating the Constitution.” Michigan Law Review 99 (2001): 1903–98.
Mancini, Judge G. F.Democracy and Constitutionalism in the European Union: Collected Essays. Oxford, 2000.
Mara, Gerald M.Hobbes's Counsel to Sovereigns.” Journal of Politics 50 (1988): 390–411.
McCloskey, Robert G., The American Supreme Court (Chicago, 1967).
McCrae, Kenneth. “Introduction.” In Jean Bodin, The Six Bookes of a Commonweale [1606], ed. McRae, , trans. Richard Knolles. Cambridge, MA, 1962: i–xii, A1–A103.
McIlwain, Charles Howard. Constitutionalism Ancient and Modern. Ithaca, NY: 1940.
Michelman, Frank. “The Constitutional Essentials of Political Liberalism: Justice as Fairness, Legitimacy, and the Question of Judicial Review.” Fordham Law Review 72 (2004): 1407–20.
Michelman, Frank. “Ida's Way: Constructing the Respect-Worthy Governmental System.” Fordham Law Review 72 (2003): 345–65.
Michelman, Frank. “Constitutional Authorship.” In Constitutionalism, ed. Alexander, Larry. Cambridge, 2001: 64–98.
Michelman, Frank. “Courts and Constitutions: Thirteeen Easy Pieces.” Michigan Law Review 93 (1995): 1297–1332.
Mitchell, Joshua. “Hobbes and the Equality of All Under the One.” Political Theory 21 (1993): 78–100.
Mulligan, Lotte, Judith Richards, and John K. Graham. “A Concern for Understanding: A Case of Locke's Precepts and Practice.” Historical Journal25 (1982): 841–57. Reprinted in John Locke:Critical Assessments, ed. Richard Ashcraft: vol. 4. New York, 1991: 670–89.
Murphy, Walter F. “Merlin's Memory: The Past and Future Imperfect of the Once and Future Polity.” In Responding to Imperfection:The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, 1995: 163–90.
Murphy, Walter F.An Ordering of Constitutional Values.” Southern California Law Review 53 (1980): 703–60.
Noonan, John T.. Narrowing the Nation's Power: The Supreme Court Sides with the States. Berkeley, 2002.
Norton, Ann. “Transubstantiation: The Dialectic of Constitutional Authority.” University of Chicago Law Review 55 (1988): 458–72.
Novak, William J.The People's Welfare: Law and Regulation in Nineteenth-Century America. Chapel Hill, NC, 1996.
Oakeshott, Michael, Rationalism in Politics. 1991, Liberty Press, Indianapolis, 1991.
Oakley, Francis, and Urdang, Elliott W.. “Locke, Natural Law, and God.” Natural Law Forum 11 (1966): 92–109.
Odegard, Douglas. “Locke as an Empiricist,” Philosophy40 (1965):185–96. Reprinted in John Locke: Critical Assessments, ed. Richard Ashcraft. New York, 1991: vol. 4, 1–12.
Olivecrona, Karl. “Locke's Theory of Appropriation.” Philosophical Quarterly24 (1974): 220–34. Reprinted in John Locke: Critical Assessments, ed. Richard Ashcraft. New York, 1991: vol. 1, 327–42.
Olivecrona, Karl. “Appropriation in the State of Nature: Locke on the Origin of Property.” Journal of the History of Ideas 35 (1974): 211–30.
Orren, Karen. “Officer's Rights: Toward a Unified Field Theory of Constitutional Development.” Law & Society Review 34 (2000): 837–909.
Parrish, Richard. Aporias of Justice. Ph.D. thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2004.
Pateman, Carole. The Sexual Contract. Stanford, 1988.
Penner, J. E. “Legal Reasoning and the Authority of Law.” In Rights, Culture, and the Law: Themes from the Legal and Political Philosophy of Joseph Raz, eds. Meyer, Lukas H., Paulson, Stanley L., and Pogge, Thomas W.. Oxford, 2003: 71–98.
Pildes, Richard H.Why Rights Are Not Trumps: Social Meanings, Expressive Harms, and Constitutionalism.” Journal of Legal Studies 27 (1998): 725–63.
Pitkin, Hannah, The Concept of Representation. Berkeley, 1972.
Pocock, J. A. G., The Machiavellian Moment (Princeton, 1975).
Post, Robert. Who's Afraid of Jurispathic Courts?: Violence and Public Reason in Nomos and Narrative.” Yale Journal of Law and Humanities 17 (2005): 9–16.
Postema, Gerald. “Law's Autonomy and Public Practical Reason.” In The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism, ed. George, Robert P.. Oxford, 1996: 79–118.
Powell, H. Jefferson. “Symposium on Philip Bobbitt's Constitutional Interpretation: Constitutional Investigations.” Texas Law Review 72 (1994): 1731–51.
Preuss, Ulrich, “The Political Meaning of Constitutionalism.” In Constitutionalism, Democracy and Sovereignty: American and European Perspectives, ed. Bellamy, Richarl. Aldershot, 1997: 11–150.
Rawls, John. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: 2001.
Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. New York, 1996.
Raz, Joseph. “Comments and Responses.” In Rights, Culture, and the Law: Themes from the Legal and Political Philosophy of Joseph Raz, eds. Meyer, Lukas H., Paulson, Stanley L., and Pogge, Thomas W.. Oxford, 2003: 253–73.
Raz, Joseph. “On the Authority and Interpretation of Constitutions: Some Preliminaries.” In Constitutionalism, ed. Alexander, Larry. Cambridge, 2001: 152–93.
Raz, Joseph. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford, 1986.
Riley, Patrick. “On Finding and Equilibrium between Consent and Natural Law in Locke's Political Philosophy.” Political Studies 22 (1974): 432–52.
Rubenfeld, Jed. Freedom and Time: A Theory of Constitunal Self-Government. New Haven, 2001a.
Rubenfeld, Jed. “Legitimacy and Interpretation.” In Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations, ed. Alexander, Larry. Cambridge, 2001b: 194–243.
Rubin, Edward L.Beyond Camelot: Rethinking Politics and Law for the Modern State. Princeton, 2005.
Sager, Lawrence. “The Constitutional Essentials of Political Liberalism: The Why of Constitutional Essentials.” Fordham Law Review 72 (2004): 1421–33.
Sager, Lawrence, “The Domain of Constitutional Justice.” In Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations, ed. Alexander, Larry. Cambridge, 1998.
Sager, Lawrence. “You Can Raise the First, Hide Behind the Fourth, and Plead the Fifth. But What On Earth Can You Do With The Ninth Amendment?Chicago-Kent Law Review 64 (1988): 239–64.
Saussure, Ferdinand. Course in General Linguistics. New York, 1966.
Schauer, Frederick. “Judicial Supremacy and the Modest Constitution.” California Law Review 92 (2004): 1045–67.
Schauer, Frederick. “Precedent and the Necessary Externality of Constitutional Norms.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 17 (1994): 45–56.
Schauer, Frederick. “Constitutional Positivism.” Connecticut Law Review 25 (1993): 797–828.
Schweber, Howard. The Creation of American Common Law, 1850–1880: Technology, Politics, and the Construction of Citizenship in Illinois and Virginia. Cambridge 2004.
Schweber, Howard Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida, 517 U.S. 44 (1995).
Shapin, Steven, and Schaeffer, Simon. Leviathan and the Air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, 1989.
Shivakumar, Dhananjai. “The Pure Theory as Ideal Type: Defending Kelsen on the Basis of Weberian Methodology.” Yale Law Journal 105 (1996): 1383–1414.
Skinner, Quentin. Foundations of Modern Political Thought, 2 vols. Cambridge, 1978.
Smith, Steven D.Expressivist Jurisprudence and the Depletion of Meaning.” Maryland Law Review 60 (2001): 506–77.
Soles, David E.Intellectualism and Natural Law in Locke's Second Treatise.” History of Political Thought 8 (1977): 63–81.
Stevenson, Drury. “To Whom Is the Law Addressed?Yale Law and Policy Review 21 (2003): 105–67.
Stewart, Iain. “Kelsen Tomorrow.” Current Legal Problems 51 (1998): 181–204.
Stewart, Iain. ‘The Critical Legal Science of Hans Kelsen.” Journal of Law and Society 17 (1990): 273–308.
Stoner, James R.. Common-Law Liberty: Rethinking American Constitutionalism. Lawrence, 2003.
Strauss, David A.Common Law Constitutional Interpretation.” University of Chicago Law Review 63 (1996): 877–935.
Sunstein, Cass R.Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do. Oxford, 2001.
Sunstein, Cass R.On the Expressive Function of Law.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 144 (1996): 2021–53.
Sunstein, Cass R.The Partial Constitution. Cambridge, MA, 1993.
Tomlins, Christopher. Law, Labor and Ideology in the Early American Republic. Cambridge, 1983.
Trenchard, John, and Thomas Gordon. Cato's Letters: or, Essays on Liberty, Civil and Religious, and other Important Subjects, ed. Hamowy, Ronald, 2 vols. Indianapolis, 1995.
Tribe, Lawrence. Constitutional Choices. Cambridge, MA, 1985.
Tuck, Richard. “Introduction.” In Thomas Hobbes, On The Citizen, eds. Tuck, Richard and Silverthorne, Michael. Cambridge, 2002: viii–xxxiii.
Tuck, Richard, “Introduction.” Thomas Hobbes Leviathan, ed. Tuck, . Cambridge, 1996: ix–xlv.
Tully, James. A Discourse on Property: John Locke and His Adversaries. Cambridge, 1980.
Tur, Richard, and Twining, William, eds. Essays on Kelsen. Oxford, 1986.
Tushnet, Mark. Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts. Princeton, 2000.
Tushnet, Mark. The American Law of Slavery, 1810–1860: Considerations of Humanity and Interest. Princeton, 1981.
Venter, Francois. “Constitution Making and the Legitimacy of the Constitution.” In National Constitutions in the Era of Integration, ed. Jyranki, Antero. The Hague, 1999: 9–29.
Verhoeven, Amaryllis. The European Union in Search of a Democratic and Constitutional Theory. The Hague, 2003.
Waldron, Jeremy. “Authority for Officials.” In Rights, Culture, and the Law: Themes from the Legal and Political Philosophy of Joseph Raz, eds. Meyer, Lukas H., Paulson, Stanley L., and Pogge, Thomas W.. Oxford, 2003: 45–69.
Waldron, Jeremy. God, Locke and Equality: Christian Foundations in Locke's Political Thought. Cambridge, 2002a.
Waldron, Jeremy. “Christopher L. Eisgruber's Constitutional Self-Government: Eisgruber's House of Lords.” University of San Francisco Law Review 37 (2002b): 89–114.
Waldron, Jeremy. “Precommitment and Disagreement.” In Contitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations, ed. Alexander, Larry. Cambridge, 2001: 271–99.
Waldron, Jeremy. “Pildes on Dworkin's Theory of Rights.” Journal of Legal Studies 29 (2000): 301–07.
Waldron, Jeremy. “What is a Human Right? Universals and the Challenge of Cultural Relativism.” Pace International Law Review 11 (1999): 129–38.
Walsh, Katherine Cramer. Talking About Politics. Chicago, 2003.
Weiler, Joseph H.The Constitution of Europe: Do the New Clothes Have an Emperor? and Other Essays on European Integration. Cambridge, 1999.
White, James Boyd. Justice as Translation: An Essay in Cultural and Legal Criticism. Chicago, 1990.
Whittington, Keith. Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review. Lawrence, KA, 1999a.
Whittington, Keith. Constitutional Construction: Divided Powers and Constitutional Meaning. Cambridge, MA, 1999b.
Wilson, James. The Works of James Wilson, ed. Green McCloskey, Robert, 2 vols. Cambridge, MA, 1967.
Wood, Gordon. The Creation of the American Republic, 1776–1787. Chapel Hill, 1969.
Yolton, John. “Locke on the Law of Nature.” Philosophical Review 67 (1958): 477–98.
Young, Iris Marion. “Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy.” In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. Benhabib, Seyla. Princeton, 1996: 120–35.
Zuckert, Michael. Launching Liberalism: On Lockean Political Philosophy. Lawrence, KA: 2002.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.