Skip to main content
×
×
Home
Latin America Confronts the United States
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 3
  • Cited by
    This book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Rausch, Jane M. 2018. Santiago Perez Triana (1898-1916) and the Pan-Americanization of the Monroe Doctrine. Historia y sociedad, p. 223.

    Long, Tom 2018. The US, Brazil and Latin America: the dynamics of asymmetrical regionalism. Contemporary Politics, Vol. 24, Issue. 1, p. 113.

    Long, Tom 2017. It’s not the size, it’s the relationship: from ‘small states’ to asymmetry. International Politics, Vol. 54, Issue. 2, p. 144.

    ×
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    Latin America Confronts the United States
    • Online ISBN: 9781316343890
    • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316343890
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to *
    ×
  • Buy the print book

Book description

Latin America Confronts the United States offers a new perspective on US-Latin America relations. Drawing on research in six countries, the book examines how Latin American leaders are able to overcome power asymmetries to influence US foreign policy. The book provides in-depth explorations of key moments in post-World War II inter-American relations - foreign economic policy before the Alliance for Progress, the negotiation of the Panama Canal Treaties, the expansion of trade through the North American Free Trade Agreement, and the growth of counternarcotics in Plan Colombia. The new evidence challenges earlier, US-centric explanations of these momentous events. Though differences in power were fundamental to each of these cases, relative weakness did not prevent Latin American leaders from aggressively pursuing their interests vis-à-vis the United States. Drawing on studies of foreign policy and international relations, the book examines how Latin American leaders achieved this influence - and why they sometimes failed.

Reviews

'With compelling evidence and theoretical clarity, Long offers a much needed reinterpretation of inter-American relations, suggesting that Latin American countries, whether large or small, have agency - when armed with ideas, leadership, and clever strategies - and that they can effectively penetrate the decentralized, fragmented US foreign policy process to influence outcomes and advance their national interests.'

Richard Feinberg - University of California, San Diego

'Tom Long’s Latin America Confronts the United States: Asymmetry and Influence is a fresh and significant contribution. Drawing on careful research about four major cases of US policy toward Latin America over the past five decades, Long shows that much of the impetus for these policies came from Latin America, not from Washington. Previous accounts exaggerate the degree of autonomous policy determination by the United States and underestimate the influence of Latin American drivers, strategies, and pressures. Long’s emphasis on the interaction between multiple Latin American actors and the fragmented processes of US policy making should become a paradigm for future analysis.'

Abraham Lowenthal - University of Southern California

‘… a landmark study that both helps us understand the dynamics of contemporary US-Latin American relations and contributes significantly to the fields of comparative politics and international relations … Dr Long’s detailed, meticulously researched study demonstrates that the conventional wisdom about compliant Latin American states mischaracterized the nature of the asymmetrical relationships since at least the 1950s. [This book] provides a complex, nuanced, and compelling analysis that demonstrates Latin Americans have long been agents of their own history, not mere puppets of the United States … Dr Long’s clear articulation of the way this study departs from prior analyses of US-Latin American relations and from prevailing conceptions about power and asymmetry in the international system enables Latin America Confronts the United States to serve as an instructive model of how an internationalist approach can deepen and change our understanding of global relations in a world characterized by asymmetry … offers important policy implications as well as theoretical insights.’

Philip Brenner - American University, Washington DC

'Aside from providing detailed and engaging historical accounts of the cases above, Long makes some interesting points vis-à-vis the dynamics shaping asymmetrical relations between great powers and weaker ones, arguing that Latin America has exercised more influence in US-Latin America relations that is normally understood. … The second case, perhaps the book's most remarkable, explains how Omar Torrijos, dictator of one of the hemisphere's smallest countries, shrewdly used postcolonial rhetoric and international institutions to convince the United States to hand over control of the Panama Canal, something US foreign policy makers were strongly opposed to at first. … The case sheds particular light on the ways in which weaker-state leaders can use international institutions in pursuit of their objectives, as well as the role weaker states can play in affecting the political agendas of larger ones.'

Oliver Stuenkel - Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Brazil

'[Long's] argument is that Latin American foreign policy initiatives have received too little attention, and that they've been strikingly successful in setting the political agenda and achieving policy goals. He uses detailed case studies Operation Pan American, the Panama Canal treaties, the North American Free Trade Agreement, and Plan Colombia. … [The book] is based on some excellent fieldwork, with extensive archival research and interviews with key participants. So beyond the analysis itself, it's an interesting read.'

Greg Weeks - University of North Carolina, Charlotte

'Long joins a growing list of scholars who have challenged the deeply held assumption that hegemonic U.S. power has left little space for Latin American countries to take the initiative in their relationships with Washington. He demonstrates that in fact, when dealing with the United States, capable Latin American leaders have not only successfully defended their interests but also astutely intervened in U.S. domestic politics to alter the way that Washington defines and pursues its interests in the region.'

Richard Feinberg Source: 'The Best of Books 2016', Foreign Affairs

'Making extensive use of archival sources in and outside the US, as well as in-depth elite interviews with key protagonists across the hemisphere, Long convincingly argues not only that the US did not always get its own way, but also that it is possible for presumably powerless countries in the region to move US policy. … This book is an excellent contribution to our understanding of US–Latin American relations and an important read for anyone interested in this area.'

Sean W. Burges Source: International Affairs

'… the book provides a fresh look at a discussion that is often dominated by Latin American worries about US intervention, with little attention paid to ways for Latin America to exercise influence in the United States. … Long’s book thus provides an important analysis for Latin American scholars, but also for those studying regional dynamics elsewhere, for example in Asia, where China’s growing influence is an ever more important topic.'

Oliver Stuenkel Source: International Journal

'University of Reading professor Tom Long reminds us in his thorough, well-researched book, Latin America Confronts the United States, bringing NAFTA into being required cagey planning and execution by Mexican politicians such as presidents Miguel de la Madrid (1982–88) and Carlos Salinas de Gortari (1988–94). Professor Long thinks that these technocratic leaders saw NAFTA as a way not just to solidify their country’s shift away from nationalist economic policies but also to lock in its concomitant strategic pursuit of stronger relations with the long-suspected gringo colossus to the north.'

Russell Crandall Source: Survival: Global Politics and Strategy

'His work supports an 'internationalist' approach to the study of US–Latin American relations which argues that Latin American actors were not superpower puppets but able to influence the course of events in their own region as well as US behaviour. It also develops the argument that weaker states in asymmetrical relations can exercise a greater degree of influence in international affairs than a focus on the purely material capabilities of the individual actors might suggest.'

Gavin O’Toole Source: Latin American Review of Books

'Whether or not one agrees with its conclusions, this book in a fundamental contribution to understanding the relations between the United States and Latin America and the Caribbean; via a complex approach, it recognizes both the profound asymmetries between the United States and its neighbors to the south and strives to show how non-central countries can still exercise a certain capacity of influence on the most powerful.'

Leandro Morgenfeld Source: translated from Observatorio Latinoamericano y Caribeño

Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×
Alexander, Robert J., Juscelino Kubitschek and the Development of Brazil (Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Center for International Studies, 1991).
Ambrose, Stephen E., Eisenhower: Soldier and President (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1990).
Neto, Octavio Amorim, De Dutra a Lula: A Condução e os Determinantes da Política Externa Brasileira (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Elsevier: Campus, 2012).
Arnson, Cynthia J., ed., The Peace Process in Colombia and U.S. Policy (Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, 2000).
Arriola, Carlos, ed., Documentos Básicos (México: SECOFI, Grupo Editorial Miguel Ángel Porrua, 1994).
Atkins, G. Pope, Latin America in the International Political System (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1989).
Ayoob, Mohammed, “Inequality and Theorizing in International Relations: The Case for Subaltern Realism,” International Studies Review, Vol. 4, No. 3 (2003), pp. 2748.
Bachrach, Peter and Baratz, Morton S., “Two Faces of Power,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 56, No. 04 (1962), pp. 947952.
Baker, James Addison and DeFrank, Thomas M., The Politics of Diplomacy: Revolution, War, and Peace, 1989–1992 (New York: Putnam, 1995).
Baldacchino, Godfrey, “Thucydides or Kissinger? A Critical Review of Smaller State Diplomacy,” in Cooper, Andrew F. and Shaw, Timothy M., eds., The Diplomacies of Small States: Between Vulnerability and Resilience (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009), pp. 2140.
Bandeira, Moniz, Brasil, Argentina e Estados Unidos: Conflito e Integração na América do Sul: Da Tríplice Aliança ao Mercosul (Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 2010).
Barnett, Michael and Duvall, Raymond, “Power in International Politics,” International Organization, Vol. 59, No. 01 (2005), pp. 3975.
Bertucci, Mariano, “Scholarly Research on U.S.–Latin American Relations: Where Does the Field Stand?,” Latin American Politics and Society, Vol. 55, No. 4 (2013), pp. 119142.
Lacerda, Gustavo Biscaia da, “Panamericanismo entre a Segurança e o Desenvolvimiento: O Operação Panamericana e a Aliança para o Progresso” (M.A., Universidade Federal do Paraná, 2004).
Bitar, Sebastian E., US Military Bases, Quasi-Bases, and Domestic Politics (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2015).
Blasier, Cole, The Hovering Giant: U.S. Responses to Revolutionary Change in Latin America. Pitt Latin American Series (Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1976).
Blight, James G. and Brenner, Philip, Sad and Luminous Days: Cuba's Struggle with the Superpowers after the Missile Crisis (Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2002).
Bonham, G. Matthew, Sergeev, Victor M., and Parshin, Pavel B., “The Limited Test–Ban Agreement: Emergence of New Knowledge Structures in International Negotiation,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 41, No. 2 (1997), pp. 215240.
Borda, Sandra P., “The Internationalization of Domestic Conflicts: A Comparative Study of Colombia, El Salvador and Guatemala,” (Ph.D. thesis, University of Minnesota, 2009).
Bowden, Mark, Killing Pablo: The Hunt for the World's Greatest Outlaw (New York: Atlantic Monthly Press, 2001).
Brands, Hal, Latin America's Cold War (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2010).
Braveboy-Wagner, Jacqueline, “Opportunities and Limitations of the Exercise of Foreign Policy Power by a Very Small State: The Case of Trinidad and Tobago,” Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Vol. 23, No. 3 (2010), pp. 407427.
Braveboy-Wagner, Jacqueline Anne and Snarr, Michael T., “Assessing Current Conceptual and Empirical Approaches,” in Braveboy-Wagner, Jacqueline Anne, ed., The Foreign Policies of the Global South: Rethinking Conceptual Frameworks (Boulder, Colo.: L. Rienner, 2003), pp. 1330.
Browning, Christopher S., “Small, Smart and Salient? Rethinking Identity in the Small States Literature,” Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Vol. 19, No. 4 (2006), pp. 669684.
Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1977).
Burges, Sean W., Brazilian Foreign Policy after the Cold War (Gainesville, Fla.: University Press of Florida, 2009).
Burges, Sean W.Mistaking Brazil for a Middle Power,” Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research, Vol. 19, No. 2 (2013).
Cameron, Maxwell A. and Tomlin, Brian W., The Making of NAFTA: How the Deal Was Done (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2000).
Campbell, Jason, O'Hanlon, Michael E., and Shapiro, Jeremy, Assessing Counterinsurgency and Stabilization Missions (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 2009).
Cardona, Diego, “La Política Exterior de la Administración Pastrana (1998–2002),” in Borda, Sandra and Tickner, Arlene B., eds., Relaciones Internacionales y Política Exterior de Colombia (Bogotá, Colombia: Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Departamento de Ciencia Política-CESO, 2011), pp. 195225.
Carter, Jimmy, Keeping Faith: Memoirs of a President (New York: Bantam Books, 1982).
Carter, Jimmy White House Diary (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2010).
Turriago, Jaime Caycedo, “Una Guerra Social de la Globalización,” in Álvarez, Jairo Estrada, ed., Plan Colombia: Ensayos Críticos (Bogotá, Colombia: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 2001), pp. 179214.
Cervo, Amado Luiz, “Política Exterior e Relações Internacionais do Brasil: Enfoque Paradigmático,” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, Vol. 46, No. 3 (2003), pp. 525.
Cervo, Amado Luiz and Bueno, Clodoaldo, História da Política Exterior do Brasil (Brasília, D.F.: Editora UnB, 2011).
Chicola, Phillip, reflections in The Peace Process in Colombia and U.S. Policy, ed. Arnson, Cynthia J., Working Papers of the Latin America Program, No. 246 (Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, 2000), pp. 3237.
Chong, Alan and Maass, Matthias, “Introduction: The Foreign Policy Power of Small States,” Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Vol. 23, No. 3 (2010), pp. 381382.
Cicek, Ozgur, “Review of a Perspective: Subaltern Realism,” The Review of International Affairs, Vol. 3, No. 3 (2004), pp. 495501.
Clark, Paul Coe, The United States and Somoza, 1933–1956: A Revisionist Look (Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 1992).
Clymer, Adam, Drawing the Line at the Big Ditch: The Panama Canal Treaties and the Rise of the Right (Lawrence, Kan.: University Press of Kansas, 2008).
Commission on United States–Latin American Relations, The United States and Latin America, Next Steps: A Second Report (New York: Center for Inter-American Relations, 1976).
Conniff, Michael L., Panama and the United States: The Forced Alliance (Athens, Ga.: University of Georgia Press, 2001).
Cook, Dean A., “U.S. Southern Command: General Charles E. Wilhelm and the Shaping of U.S. Military Engagement in Colombia, 1997–2000,” in Reveron, Derek S., ed., America's Viceroys: The Military and U.S. Foreign Policy (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), pp. 127162.
Costa, Licurgo, Uma Nova Política para as Américas: Doutrina Kubitschek e Opa (São Paulo: Livraria Martins, 1960).
Cottam, Martha L., Images and Intervention: U.S. Policies in Latin America (Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1994).
Craig, Richard B., “Colombian Narcotics and United States–Colombian Relations,” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, Vol. 23, No. 3 (1981), pp. 243270.
Crandall, Russell, Driven by Drugs: U.S. Policy toward Colombia, 1st edn. (Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2002).
Crandall, Russell Driven by Drugs: US Policy toward Colombia, 2nd edn. (Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2008).
Crandall, Russell Gunboat Democracy: U.S. Interventions in the Dominican Republic, Grenada, and Panama (Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2006).
Crandall, Russell The United States and Latin America after the Cold War (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008).
Culpepper, Pepper D., “The Politics of Common Knowledge: Ideas and Institutional Change in Wage Bargaining,” International Organization, Vol. 62, No. 1 (2008), pp. 133.
Dahl, Robert A., Modern Political Analysis (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1976).
Dahl, Robert A.The Concept of Power,” Behavioral Science, Vol. 2, No. 3 (1957), pp. 201215.
Darnton, Christopher, “Asymmetry and Agenda-Setting in US–Latin American Relations: Rethinking the Origins of the Alliance for Progress,” Journal of Cold War Studies, Vol. 14, No. 4 (2012), pp. 5592.
Darnton, Christopher Rivalry and Alliance Politics in Cold War Latin America (Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014).
Garza, Rodolfo O. de la and Velasco, Jesús, México y su Interacción con el Sistema Político Estadounidense (México: CIDE, Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas: M.A. Porrúa Grupo Editorial, 2000).
Guardia de Corró, María Mercedes de la, Hasta la Última Gota: Gabriel Lewis Galindo (Cali, Colombia: Cargraphics, 2009).
Delano, Alexandra, Mexico and Its Diaspora in the United States: Policies of Emigration since 1848 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011).
Silvia, Alexandra de Mello e, “A Política Externa do JK: Operação Pan-Americana” (Rio de Janiero: Fundação Getulio Vargas, 1992).
Dinges, John, Our Man in Panama: How General Noriega Used the United States and Made Millions in Drugs and Arms (New York: Random House, 1990).
Dobbs, Michael, One Minute to Midnight: Kennedy, Khrushchev, and Castro on the Brink of Nuclear War (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2008).
Domínguez, Jorge I. and Castro, Rafael Fernández de, The United States and Mexico: Between Partnership and Conflict (New York: Routledge, 2001).
Donnelly, Jack, “Sovereign Inequalities and Hierarchy in Anarchy: American Power and International Society,” European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 12, No. 2 (2006).
Dourado, Autran, Gaiola Aberta: Tempos de JK e Schmidt (Rio de Janeiro: Rocco, 2000).
Eisenhower, Milton Stover, The Wine Is Bitter: The United States and Latin America (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1963).
Eisenstadt, Todd, “The Rise of the Mexico Lobby in Washington: Even Further from God and Even Closer to the United States,” in Garza, Rodolfo O.De la and Velasco, Jesús, eds., Bridging the Border: Transforming Mexico–U.S. Relations (Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 1997), p. 89.
Escobar Bethancourt, Rómulo, Torrijos: Colonia Americana, No! (Bogotá, Colombia: C. Valencia Editores, 1981).
Escudé, Carlos, Foreign Policy Theory in Menem's Argentina (Gainesville, Fla.: University Press of Florida, 1997).
Álvarez, Jairo Estrada, ed., Plan Colombia: Ensayos Críticos (Bogotá, Colombia: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 2001).
Evans, Peter B., Jacobson, Harold Karan, and Putnam, Robert D., eds., Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1993).
Farnsworth, David N. and McKenney, James W., U.S.–Panama Relations, 1903–1978: A Study in Linkage Politics (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1983).
Fawcett, Louise L'Estrange, “The Origins and Development of the Regional Idea in the Americas,” in Fawcett, Louise L'Estrange and Serrano, Mónica, eds., Regionalism and Governance in the Americas: Continental Drift (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).
Feinberg, Richard E., “Regionalism and Domestic Politics: US–Latin American Trade Policy in the Bush Era,” Latin American Politics and Society, Vol. 44, No. 4 (2002), pp. 127151.
Soto, Guillermo Fernández de, La Ilusión Posible: Un Testimonio sobre la Política Exterior Colombiana (Bogotá, Colombia: Grupo Editorial Norma, 2004).
Finnemore, Martha and Sikkink, Kathryn, “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change,” International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 4 (1998), pp. 887917.
Friedman, Max Paul, “Fracas in Caracas: Latin American Diplomatic Resistance to United States Intervention in Guatemala in 1954,” Diplomacy & Statecraft, Vol. 21, No. 4 (2010), pp. 669689.
Friedman, Max PaulRetiring the Puppets, Bringing Latin America Back In: Recent Scholarship on United States–Latin American Relations,” Diplomatic History, Vol. 27, No. 5 (2003), pp. 621636.
Friedman, Max Paul and Long, Tom, “Soft Balancing in the Americas: Latin American Opposition to U.S. Intervention, 1898–1936,” International Security, Vol. 40, No. 1 (2015).
Furlong, William L. and Scranton, Margaret E., The Dynamics of Foreign Policymaking: The President, the Congress, and the Panama Canal Treaties (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1984).
Galeano, Eduardo, Open Veins of Latin America: Five Centuries of the Pillage of a Continent (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1973).
George, Alexander L. and Bennett, Andrew, Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 2005).
Gilderhus, Mark T., “An Emerging Synthesis? U.S.–Latin American Relations since the Second World War,” Diplomatic History, Vol. 16, No. 3 (1992), pp. 429452.
Giugale, Marcelo, Lafourcade, O., and Luff, Connie, Colombia: The Economic Foundation of Peace (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 2003).
Gleijeses, Piero, “The View from Havana: Lessons from Cuba's African Journey, 1959–1976,” in Joseph, Gilbert M. and Spenser, Daniela, eds., In from the Cold: Latin America's New Encounter with the Cold War (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2008).
González, Guadalupe González, “Las Estrategias de Política Exterior de México en la Era de la Globalización,” Foro Internacional, Vol. 41, No. 4, (2001), pp. 619669.
Goodwin, Richard N., Remembering America: A Voice from the Sixties (New York: Harper & Row, 1989).
Gordon, Lincoln, A New Deal for Latin America: The Alliance for Progress (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1963).
Grandin, Greg, Empire's Workshop: Latin America, the United States, and the Rise of the New Imperialism (New York: Metropolitan Books, 2006).
Grandin, Greg The Last Colonial Massacre: Latin America in the Cold War (Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 2004).
Grayson, George W., The North American Free Trade Agreement: Regional Community and the New World Order (Lanham, Md.: University Press of America, 1995).
Greene, Julie, The Canal Builders: Making America's Empire at the Panama Canal (New York: Penguin Press, 2009).
Grow, Michael, U.S. Presidents and Latin American Interventions: Pursuing Regime Change in the Cold War (Lawrence, Kan.: University Press of Kansas, 2008).
Gustavsson, J., “How Should We Study Foreign Policy Change?,” Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. 34, No. 1 (1999), pp. 7396.
Guzzini, Stefano, “The Concept of Power: A Constructivist Analysis,” Millennium – Journal of International Studies, Vol. 33, No. 3 (2005), pp. 495521.
Hakim, Peter, “Is Washington Losing Latin America?,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 85, No. 1 (2006), pp. 3953.
Handel, Michael I., Weak States in the International System (London; Totowa, N.J.: F. Cass, 1981).
Hey, Jeanne A.K., “Three Building Blocks of a Theory of Latin American Foreign Policy,” Third World Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 4 (1997), pp. 631657.
Hey, Jeanne A.K., ed., Small States in World Politics: Explaining Foreign Policy Behavior (Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2003).
Hilton, Stanley E., “The United States, Brazil, and the Cold War, 1945–1960: End of the Special Relationship,” Journal of American History, Vol. 68, No. 3 (1981), pp. 599624.
Hirst, Mônica and Hurrell, Andrew, The United States and Brazil: A Long Road of Unmet Expectations (New York: Routledge, 2005).
Hogan, J. Michael, The Panama Canal in American Politics: Domestic Advocacy and the Evolution of Policy (Carbondale, Ill.: Southern Illinois University Press, 1986).
Hornbeck, J.F. and Cooper, William H., “Trade Promotion Authority and the Role of Congress in Trade Policy,” November 4, 2010, RL33743, (Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, 2010). Available online: http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/152034.pdf.
Houghton, David Patrick, “Reinvigorating the Study of Foreign Policy Decision Making: Toward a Constructivist Approach,” Foreign Policy Analysis, Vol. 3, No. 1 (2007), pp. 2445.
Hurrell, Andrew, On Global Order: Power, Values, and the Constitution of International Society (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2007).
Suárez, Omar Jaén, Las Negociaciones de los Tratados Torrijos-Carter: 1970–1979 (Panamá: Autoridad del Canal de Panamá, 2005).
Suárez, Omar Jaén Las Negociaciones sobre el Canal de Panamá: 1964–1970 (Bogotá, Colombia: Grupo Editorial Norma, 2002).
Jorden, William J., Panama Odyssey (Austin, Tex.: University of Texas Press, 1984).
Joseph, Gilbert M., LeGrand, Catherine, and Salvatore, Ricardo Donato, eds., Close Encounters of Empire: Writing the Cultural History of U.S.–Latin American Relations (London: Duke University Press, 1998).
Kacowicz, Arie Marcelo, The Impact of Norms in International Society: The Latin American Experience, 1881–2001 (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 2005).
Kahler, Miles, Liberalization and Foreign Policy (New York: Columbia University Press, 1997).
Keller, Renata, “A Foreign Policy for Domestic Consumption: Mexico's Lukewarm Defense of Castro, 1959–1969,” Latin American Research Review, Vol. 47, No. 2 (2012), pp. 100119.
Keohane, Robert O., “The Big Influence of Small Allies,” Foreign Policy, No. 2 (1971), pp. 161182.
Kessel, Georgina, Lo Negociado del TLC: Un Análisis Económico sobre el Impacto Sectorial del Tratado Trilateral de Libre Comercio (México, D.F.: McGraw Hill, 1994).
Khong, Yuen Foong, Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965 (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1992).
Kissinger, Henry, Years of Renewal (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1999).
Krugman, Paul, “The Uncomfortable Truth about NAFTA: It's Foreign Policy, Stupid,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 72, No. 5 (1993), pp. 1319.
Kubitschek, Juscelino, Meu Caminho para Brasília (Rio de Janeiro: Bloch Editores, 1974).
Kubitschek, Juscelino Meu Caminho para Brasilia: A Escalada Politica, Vol. 2 (Rio de Janeiro: Bloch Editores, 1976).
Kubitschek, Juscelino Meu Caminho para Brasília: Cinqüenta Anos em Cinco, Vol. 3 (Rio de Janeiro: Bloch Editores, 1978).
LaFeber, Walter, Inevitable Revolutions: The United States in Central America (New York: Norton, 1983).
LaFeber, Walter The New Empire; an Interpretation of American Expansion, 1860–1898 (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1963).
LaFeber, Walter The Panama Canal: The Crisis in Historical Perspective (New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989).
Lake, David A., Hierarchy in International Relations (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2009).
Latham, Michael E., Modernization as Ideology: American Social Science and “Nation Building” in the Kennedy Era (Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press, 2000).
Lawrence, Mark Atwood, “Containing Globalism: The United States and the Developing World in the 1970s,” in Ferguson, Niall, ed., The Shock of the Global: The 1970s in Perspective (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2010), pp. 205219.
Leacock, Ruth, Requiem for Revolution: The United States and Brazil, 1961–1969 (Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press, 1990).
LeoGrande, William M., “From the Red Menace to Radical Populism: U.S. Insecurity in Latin America,” World Policy Journal, Vol. 22, No. 4 (2005), pp. 2535.
LeoGrande, William M. and Kornbluh, Peter, Back Channel to Cuba: The Hidden History of Negotiations between Washington and Havana (Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press Books, 2014).
Levinson, Jerome I. and Onís, Juan de, The Alliance That Lost Its Way: A Critical Report on the Alliance for Progress (Chicago, Ill.: Quadrangle Books, 1970).
Levy, Jack S., “Qualitative Methods and Cross-Method Dialogue in Political Science,” Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 40, No. 2 (2007), pp. 196214.
Lindsay, James M., “Congress and Foreign Policy: Why the Hill Matters,” Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 107, No. 4 (1992), pp. 607628.
Linowitz, Sol M., The Making of a Public Man: A Memoir (Boston: Little, Brown, 1985).
Linowitz, Sol M. and Silvert, Kalman H., The Americas in a Changing World: A Report of the Commission on United States–Latin American Relations (New York: Quadrangle, 1975).
Lipschutz, Ronnie D., ed., On Security, New Directions in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1995).
Livingstone, Grace, Inside Colombia: Drugs, Democracy and War (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 2004).
Camargo, Alberto Lleras, “The Alliance for Progress: Aims, Distortions, Obstacles,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 42, No. 1 (1963), pp. 2537.
Loaeza, Soledad, “La Política de Acomodo de México a la Superpotencia. Dos Episodios de Cambio de Régimen: 1944–1948 y 1989–1994,” Foro Internacional, Vol. 50, No. 3–4 (2010), pp. 627660.
Long, Tom, “Putting the Canal on the Map: Panamanian Agenda-Setting and the 1973 Security Council Meetings,” Diplomatic History, Vol. 38, No. 2 (2014), pp. 431455.
Longley, Kyle, The Sparrow and the Hawk: Costa Rica and the United States during the Rise of José Figueres (Tuscaloosa, Ala.: University of Alabama Press, 1997).
Guevara, Carlos Alfredo López, “Panamá Tiene Derecho a Denunciar la Convención del Canal Ístmico de 1903 por Violaciones a la Misma por Parte de Estados Unidos,” (Panamá: Centro de Impresión Educativa, 1971).
Lowenthal, Abraham F., Partners in Conflict: The United States and Latin America (Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987).
Lowenthal, Abraham F.United States Policy toward Latin America: ‘Liberal,’ ‘Radical,’ and ‘Bureaucratic’ Perspectives,” Latin American Research Review, Vol. 8, No. 3 (1973), pp. 325.
Lowenthal, Abraham F., Piccone, Theodore J., and Whitehead, Laurence, The Obama Administration and the Americas: Agenda for Change (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2009).
Lukes, Steven, Power: A Radical View (London: Macmillan, 1974).
Maddison, Angus, The World Economy (Academic Foundation, 2007).
Major, John, Prize Possession: The United States and the Panama Canal, 1903–1979 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993).
Marcella, Gabriel, The United States and Colombia: The Journey from Ambiguity to Strategic Clarity (Carlisle Barracks, Pa.: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 2003).
Marcy, William L., The Politics of Cocaine: How U.S. Foreign Policy Has Created a Thriving Drug Industry in Central and South America (Chicago, Ill.: Lawrence Hill Books, 2010).
Margheritis, Ana, “Interamerican Relations in the Early Twenty-First Century,” Latin American Politics and Society, Vol. 52, No. 4 (2010), pp. 137146.
Martin, Lisa L., Democratic Commitments: Legislatures and International Cooperation (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2000).
Mayer, Frederick W., Interpreting NAFTA: The Science and Art of Political Analysis (New York: Columbia University Press, 1998).
McCullough, David G., The Path between the Seas: The Creation of the Panama Canal, 1870–1914 (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1977).
McPherson, Alan L., Intimate Ties, Bitter Struggles: The United States and Latin America since 1945 (Washington, D.C.: Potomac Books, 2006).
McPherson, Alan, “Courts of World Opinion: Trying the Panama Flag Riots of 1964,” Diplomatic History, Vol. 28, No. 1 (2004), pp. 83112.
Mearsheimer, John J., The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: Norton, 2001).
Mintz, Alex, “Applied Decision Analysis: Utilizing Poliheuristic Theory to Explain and Predict Foreign Policy and National Security Decisions,” International Studies Perspectives, Vol. 6, No. 1 (2005), pp. 9498.
Mintz, Alex and Redd, Steven B., “Framing Effects in International Relations,” Synthese, Vol. 135, No. 2 (2003), pp. 193213.
Moffett, George D., The Limits of Victory: The Ratification of the Panama Canal Treaties (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1985).
Morgenfeld, Leandro, Vecinos en Conflicto: Argentina y los Estados Unidos en Conferencias Panamericanas (Buenos Aires: Ediciones Continente, 2010).
Motyl, Alexander J., “Is Everything Empire? Is Empire Everything?,” Comparative Politics, Vol. 38, No. 2 (2006), pp. 229249.
Moulton, Aaron Coy, “Building Their Own Cold War in Their Own Backyard: The Transnational, International Conflicts in the Greater Caribbean Basin, 1944–1954,” Cold War History, Vol. 15, No. 2 (2015).
Mount, Graeme S. and Gauthier, Mark, 895 Days that Changed the World: The Presidency of Gerald R. Ford (Montréal: Black Rose Books, 2006).
Munck, Gerardo L., “Tools for Qualitative Research,” in Brady, Henry E. and Collier, David, eds., Rethinking Social Inquiry (Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004), pp. 105122.
Manrique, C.A. Murgueitio, “Los Gobiernos Militares de Marcos Pérez Jiménez y Gustavo Rojas Pinilla: Nacionalismo, Anticomunismo y sus Relaciones con los Estados Unidos (1953–1957),” Historia y Espacio, No. 25 (2014), pp. 3997.
Noriega, Manuel Antonio and Eisner, Peter, America's Prisoner: The Memoirs of Manuel Noriega (New York: Random House, 1997).
Nye, Joseph S., Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics (New York: Public Affairs, 2004).
O'Brien, Thomas F., “Interventions, Conventional and Unconventional: Current Scholarship on Inter-American Relations,” Latin American Research Review, Vol. 44, No. 1 (2009), pp. 257265.
Ojeda, Mario. Alcances y Límites de la Política Exterior de México (Mexico City: Colegio de México, 1976).
Ozores, Carlos, “Omar Torrijos y sus Proyecciones en la Política Internacional,” Revista Lotería, Vol. Agosto–Diciembre, No. 305–309 (1981).
Pastor, Robert A., Exiting the Whirlpool: U.S. Foreign Policy toward Latin America and the Caribbean (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 2001).
Pastor, Robert A.Review: Explaining U.S. Policy toward the Caribbean Basin: Fixed and Emerging Images,” World Politics, Vol. 38, No. 3 (1986), pp. 483515.
Pastor, Robert A.The United States and Central America: Interlocking Debates,” in Evans, Peter B., Jacobson, Harold Karan, and Putnam, Robert D., eds., Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1993).
Pastor, Robert A.The United States: Divided by a Revolutionary Vision,” in Pastor, Robert A., ed., A Century's Journey: How the Great Powers Shape the World (New York: Basic Books, 1999), pp. 141238.
Pastor, Robert A. and Long, Tom, “The Cold War and Its Aftermath in the Americas: The Search for a Synthetic Interpretation of U.S. Policy,” Latin American Research Review, Vol. 45, No. 3 (2010), pp. 261273.
Arango, Andrés Pastrana and Gómez, Camilo, La Palabra Bajo Fuego (Bogotá, Colombia: Planeta, 2005).
Peceny, Mark and Durnan, Michael, “The FARC's Best Friend: U.S. Antidrug Policies and the Deepening of Colombia's Civil War in the 1990s,” Latin American Politics and Society, Vol. 48, No. 2 (2006), pp. 95116.
Petras, James, “Geopolitics of Plan Colombia,” Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 35, No. 52/53 (2000), pp. 46174623.
Pickering, Thomas R., “Anatomy of Plan Colombia,” The American Interest, Vol. 5, No. 2 (2009).
Porzecanski, Roberto, “Alliance for Progress or Alizana para el Progreso: A Reassessment of the Latin American Contribution to the Alliance for Progress,” M.A. thesis, Tufts University (2005), p. 39.
Pressman, Jeremy, Warring Friends: Alliance Restraint in International Politics (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2008).
Putnam, Robert D., “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games,” International Organization, Vol. 42, No. 03 (1988), pp. 427460.
Rabe, Stephen G., Eisenhower and Latin America: The Foreign Policy of Anticommunism (Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press, 1988).
Rabe, Stephen G.The Elusive Conference: United States Economic Relations with Latin America, 1945–1952,” Diplomatic History, Vol. 2, No. 3 (1978), pp. 279294.
Rabe, Stephen G. The Most Dangerous Area in the World: John F. Kennedy Confronts Communist Revolution in Latin America (Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press, 1999).
Randall, Stephen J., Colombia and the United States: Hegemony and Interdependence (Athens, Ga.: University of Georgia Press, 1992).
Suárez, Alfredo Rangel, “The Military and the Peace Process in Colombia,” in Arnson, Cynthia J., ed., The Peace Process in Colombia and U.S. Policy (Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, 2000).
Risse-Kappen, Thomas, Cooperation among Democracies: The European Influence on U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton Studies in International History and Politics (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1995).
Robert, Maryse, Negotiating NAFTA Explaining the Outcome in Culture, Textiles, Autos, and Pharmaceuticals (Toronto: University of Toronto, 2000).
Chaves, Germán Rodas, El Plan Colombia: Análisis de una Estrategia Neoliberal (Quito, Ecuador: Ediciones Abya-Yala, 2002).
Rivera, Diana Marcela Rojas and Cruz, Adolfo León Atehortúa, “Ecos del Proceso de Paz y el Plan Colombia en la Prensa Norteamericana,” in Universidad Nacional Instituto de Estudios Políticos y Relaciones Internacionales, ed., El Plan Colombia y la Internacionalización del Conflicto (Bogotá, Colombia: Editorial Planeta Colombiana, 2001).
Russell, Roberto and Tokatlian, Juan Gabriel, “From Antagonistic Autonomy to Relational Autonomy: A Theoretical Reflection from the Southern Cone,” Latin American Politics and Society, Vol. 45, No. 1 (2003), pp. 124.
Gortari, Carlos Salinas de, México: Un Paso Dificil a la Modernidad (Barcelona: Plaza & Janés Editores, 2000).
Sargent, Daniel, Haslam, Jonathan, Friedman, Max Paul, and Brands, Hal, “Online Roundtable: Hal Brands’ Latin America's Cold War Hal Brands, Latin America's Cold War,” Journal of American Studies, Vol. 46, No. 01 (2012).
Schmidli, W.M., “Tracking the Cold War in Latin America,” Reviews in American History, Vol. 40, No. 2 (2012), pp. 332338.
Schoonover, Thomas, “Max Farrand's Memorandum on the U.S. Role in the Panamanian Revolution of 1903,” Diplomatic History, Vol. 12, No. 4 (1988), pp. 501506.
Schoultz, Lars, Beneath the United States: A History of U.S. Policy toward Latin America (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998).
Schoultz, Lars That Infernal Little Cuban Republic: The United States and the Cuban Revolution (Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press, 2009).
Serafino, Nina M., Colombia: U.S. Assistance and Current Legislation (Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service, 2001).
Sheldon, Maram, “Juscelino Kubitschek and the Politics of Exuberance, 1956–1961,” Luso-Brazilian Review, Vol. 27, No. 1 (1990), pp. 3145.
Siekmeier, James F., The Bolivian Revolution and the United States, 1952 to the Present (University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2011).
Skidmore, David, “Explaining State Responses to International Change: The Structural Sources of Foreign Policy Rigidity and Change,” in Rosati, Jerel A., Hagan, Joe. D., and Sampson, Martin W., III, eds., Foreign Policy Restructuring (Columbia, S.C.: University of South Carolina Press, 1994), pp. 4364.
Skidmore, Thomas E., Politics in Brazil, 1930–1964: An Experiment in Democracy (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007).
Smith, Peter H., Talons of the Eagle: Dynamics of U.S.–Latin American Relations (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).
Lima, Maria Regina Soares de and Hirst, Mônica, “Brazil as an Intermediate State and Regional Power: Action, Choice and Responsibilities,” International Affairs 82, no. 1 (2006), pp. 2140.
Sorensen, Theodore C., Counselor: A Life at the Edge of History (New York: Harper, 2008).
Strange, Susan, “The Persistent Myth of Lost Hegemony,” International Organization, Vol. 41, No. 04 (1987), pp. 551574.
Streeter, Stephen M., “Campaigning against Latin American Nationalism: U.S. Ambassador John Moors Cabot in Brazil, 1959–1961,” The Americas, Vol. 51, No. 2 (1994), pp. 193218.
Tack, Juan Antonio, “La Lucha de Omar Torrijos por la Recuperación de la Integridad Nacional,” Revista Lotería, Vol. Agosto–Diciembre, No. 305–309 (1981).
Taffet, Jeffrey F., Foreign Aid as Foreign Policy: The Alliance for Progress in Latin America (New York: Routledge, 2007).
Teixeira, Carlos Gustavo Poggio, Brazil, the United States, and the South American Subsystem: Regional Politics and the Absent Empire (Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books, 2012).
Thompson, David P., “Pablo Escobar, Drug Baron: His Surrender, Imprisonment, and Escape,” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, Vol. 19, No. 1 (1996), pp. 5591.
Tickner, Arlene, “El Pensamiento sobre las Relaciones Internacionales en América Latina,” in Borda, Sandra and Tickner, Arlene B., eds., Relaciones Internacionales y Política Exterior de Colombia (Bogotá, Colombia: Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Departamento de Ciencia Política-CESO, 2011), pp. 551573.
Tickner, ArleneIntervención por Invitación: Claves de la Política Exterior Colombiana y de sus Debilidades Principales,” Colombia Internacional, Vol. 65 (2007), pp. 90111.
Tickner, ArleneLatin American IR and the Primacy of lo Práctico,” International Studies Review, Vol. 10, No. 4 (2008), pp. 735748.
Tickner, Arlene and Cepeda, Carolina, “Las Drogas Ilícitas en la Relación Colombia-Estados Unidos,” in Uribe, Alejandro Gaviria and Londoño, Mejía, eds., Políticas Antidroga en Colombia: Éxitos, Fracasos y Extravíos (Bogotá, Colombia: Universidad de los Andes, 2011), pp. 205234.
Tickner, Arlene, García, Diego, and Arreaza, Catalina, “Actores Violentos No Estatales y Narcotráfico en Colombia,” in Uribe, Alejandro Gaviria and Londoño, Mejía, eds., Políticas Antidroga en Colombia: Éxitos, Fracasos y Extravíos (Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes, 2011), pp. 413445.
Tokatlian, Juan Gabriel, “Colombia, el Plan Colombia y la Región Andina: Implosión o Concertación?,” Nueva Sociedad, Vol. 173 (2001), pp. 126143.
Tokatlian, Juan Gabriel “The Political Economy of Colombian–U.S. Narcodiplomacy: A Case Study of Colombian Foreign Policy Decision-Making, 1978–1990,” Ph.D. thesis (Johns Hopkins University, 1991).
Torres, Blanca, “Estrategias y tácticas mexicanas en la conducción de sus relaciones con Estados Unidos (1945–1970),” Foro Internacional, Vol. 50, No. 3–4 (2010), pp. 661688.
United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America, ed. International Cooperation in a Latin American Development Policy (New York: United Nations, September 1954).
Vigevani, Tullo and Cepaluni, Gabriel, “A Política Externa de Lula da Silva: A Estratégia da Autonomia Pela Diversificação,” Contexto Internacional, Vol. 29, No. 2 (2007), pp. 273335.
Villar, Oliver and Cottle, Drew, Cocaine, Death Squads, and the War on Terror: U.S. Imperialism and Class Struggle in Colombia (New York: Monthly Review Press, 2011).
Bertrab, Hermann von, Negotiating NAFTA: A Mexican Envoy's Account (Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 1997).
Weeks, Gregory, U.S. and Latin American Relations (New York: Pearson Longman, 2008).
Weeks, Gregory, “Recent Works on U.S.–Latin American Relations,” Latin American Research Review, Vol. 44, No. 1 (2009), pp. 247256.
Weintraub, Sidney, Unequal Partners: The United States and Mexico (Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2010).
Weis, W. Michael, Cold Warriors & Coups D'etat: Brazilian–American Relations, 1945–1964 (Albuquerque, N.M.: University of New Mexico, 1993).
Weis, W. MichaelThe Twilight of Pan-Americanism: The Alliance for Progress, Neo-Colonialism, and Non-Alignment in Brazil, 1961–1964,” The International History Review, Vol. 23, No. 2 (2001), pp. 322344.
Welch, David A., Painful Choices: A Theory of Foreign Policy Change (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2005).
Wendt, Alexander, Social Theory of International Politics (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999).
Whitehead, Laurence, “A Project for the Americas,” in Lowenthal, Abraham F., Piccone, Theodore J., and Whitehead, Laurence, eds., The Obama Administration and the Americas: Agenda for Change (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2009), pp. 203224.
Williams, Mark Eric, Understanding U.S.–Latin American Relations: Theory and History (New York: Routledge, 2012).
Winham, Gilbert R., “Dispute Settlement in the NAFTA and the FTA,” in Globerman, Steven and Walker, Michael, eds., Assessing NAFTA: A Trinational Analysis (Vancouver: Fraser Institute, 1993), pp. 251270.
Wolfowitz, Paul and O'Hanlon, Michael E., “Plan Afghanistan,” Foreign Policy, October 28, 2011.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed