Skip to main content
×
Home
Law and Religion in Theoretical and Historical Context
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 2
  • Cited by
    This book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Malik, Maleiha 2011. Religious Freedom, Free Speech and Equality: Conflict or Cohesion?. Res Publica, Vol. 17, Issue. 1, p. 21.


    Stychin, Carl F 2009. Closet Cases. Griffith Law Review, Vol. 18, Issue. 1, p. 17.


    ×
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    Law and Religion in Theoretical and Historical Context
    • Online ISBN: 9780511493843
    • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493843
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to? *
    ×
  • Buy the print book

Book description

Is there a place for religious language in the public square? Which institution of government is best suited to deciding whether religion should influence law? Should states be required to treat religion and non-religion in the same way? How does the historical role of religion in a society influence the modern understanding of the role of religion in that society? This volume of essays examines the nature and scope of engagements between law and religion, addressing fundamental questions such as these. Contributors range from eminent scholars working in the fields of law and religion to important new voices who add vital and original ideas. From conservative to liberal, doctrinal to post-modernist and secular to religious, each contributor brings a different approach to the questions under discussion, resulting in a lively, passionate and thoughtful debate that adds light rather than heat to this complex area.

    • Aa
    • Aa
Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send:
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.


P. Norris and R. Inglehart , Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide (Cambridge University Press, 2004).

C. L. Eisgruber and L. G. Sager , Religious Freedom and the Constitution (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007).

C. Taylor , ‘Understanding and Ethnocentricity’ in Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers 2 (Cambridge University Press, 1985) 116.

C. Larmore , ‘Political Liberalism’ (1990) 18 Political Theory 343–4.

M. J. Sandel , ‘Book Review of Political Liberalism (1994) 107 Harvard Law Review 1770.

J. Rawls , ‘The Idea of Public Reason Revisited’ (1997) 64 University of Chicago Law Review 767 n. 7

D. N. Cinotti , ‘The Incoherence of Neutrality: A Case for Eliminating Neutrality from Religion Clause Jurisrprudence’ (2003) 45 Journal of Church and State 499.

Ahdar and Leigh , Religious Freedom in the Liberal State (Oxford University Press, 2005), p. 152.

R. J. Arneson , ‘Neutrality and Utility’ (1990) 20 Canadian Journal of Philosophy 218.

B. Barry , ‘How Not to Defend Liberal Institutions’ (1990) 20 British Journal of Political Science 8–10.

S. Fish , ‘Mission Impossible: Settling the Just Bounds Between Church and State’ (1997) 97 Columbia Law Review 2272.

H. Baker , ‘Competing Orthodoxies in the Public Square: Postmodernism's Effect on Church-State Separation’ (2004–5) 20 Journal of Law and Religion 119–20.

S.E. Merry , ‘Legal Pluralism’ (1988) 22 (5) Law and Society Review 869–96

J. Brett , ‘Class, Religion, and Foundation of the Australian Party System: A Revisionist Interpretation’ (2002) 37 Australian Journal of Political Science 39–56.

M.-M. Kleinhans and R. A. Macdonald , ‘What is a Critical Legal Pluralism?’ (1997) 12 (2) Canadian Journal of Law and Society/Revue Canadienne de droit et société 25–46

D. Priel , ‘Farewell to the Exclusive-Inclusive Debate’ (2005) 25 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 675–96.

V. Bader , ‘Religious Pluralism: Secularism or Priority for Democracy’ (1999) 27 Political Theory 597–633 at 603–7.

J. Scott , ‘Symptomatic Politics: The Banning of Islamic Head Scarves in French Public Schools’ (2005) 23 (3) French Politics, Culture and Society 106–27.

C. Smart , Feminism and the Power of Law (London: Routledge, 1989)

D. Herman , ‘“An Unfortunate Coincidence”: Jews and Jewishness in Twentieth-century English Judicial Discourse’ (2006) 33 Journal of Law and Society 277–301.

Q. Mirza , ‘Islam, Hybridity and the Laws of Marriage’ (2000) 14 Australian Feminist Law Journal 1–22

I. Yilmaz , ‘The Challenge of Post-modern Legality and Muslim Legal Pluralism in England’ (2002) 28 Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 343–54.

I. Watson , ‘Indigenous People's Law-Ways: Survival Against the Colonial State’ (1997) 8 Australian Feminist Law Journal 39

S. H. Razack , ‘Imperilled Muslim Women, Dangerous Muslim Men and Civilised Europeans: Legal and Social Responses to Forced Marriages’ (2004) 12 Feminist Legal Studies 129–74.

Z. Mir-Hosseini , ‘The Construction of Gender in Islamic Legal Thought and Strategies for Reform’ (2003) 1 (1) HAWWA: Journal of Women in the Middle East and the Islamic World 1

C. Gans , The Limits of Nationalism (Cambridge University Press, 2003)

Y Nehushtan The Limits of Tolerance: A Substantive-Liberal Perception’ (2007) 20(2) Ratio Juris 230–57

J. Finnis , ‘“The Thing I Am”: Personal Identity in Aquinas and Shakespeare’ in E. F. Paul , F. D. Miller and J. Paul (eds.), Personal Identity (Cambridge University Press, 2005) 250

L. O. Gostin , ‘Ethics, the Constitution, and the Dying Process’ (2005) May Journal of the American Medical Association 2403

B. Smith , ‘Legal Personality’ (1928) 37 Yale Law Journal 283

Lawrence Friedman Is there a Modern Legal Culture?’ (1994) 7 Ratio Juris 117

E. Roosevelt , ‘The Promise of Human Rights’ in Foreign Affairs (April 1948) 470

J. Keown , ‘The Case of Ms B: Suicide's Slippery Slope?’ (2002) 28 Journal of Medical Ethics 238–9

M. Evans , ‘Human Rights, Religious Liberty and the Universality Debate’ in R. O'Dair and A. Lewis , Law and Religion (OxfordUniversity Press, 2001)

P. Taylor , Freedom of Religion: UN and European Human Rights Law and Practice (Cambridge University Press, 2005), chapter 3

S. Greer , The European Convention on Human Rights: Achievements, Problems and Prospects (Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 222–6

T. Lewis , ‘What Not to Wear: Religious Rights, the European Court and the Margin of Appreciation’ (2007) 56 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 395

Evans , C., The Freedom of Religion under the European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. 57–9

M.-B. Dembour , ‘Following the Movement of a Pendulum: Between Universalism and Relativism’ in J. Cowan , M.-B. Dembour and R. Wilson (eds.), Culture and Rights: Anthropological Perspectives (Cambridge University Press, 2001).

A. Schachar , ‘Group Identity and Women's Rights in Family Law: The Perils of Multicultural Accommodation’ (1998) 6 Journal of Political Philosophy 285–305

M. Barnhart , ‘An Overlapping Consensus: A Critique of Two Approaches’ (2004) 66 Review of Politics 257–83.

M. Chiba , ‘Other Phases Of Legal Pluralism in the Contemporary World’ (1998) 11 (3) Ratio Juris 228–45

Yilmaz , ‘Law as Chameleon: The Question of Incorporation of Muslim Personal Law into the English Law’ (2001) 21 Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs 297–308.

V. Lal , ‘Sikh Kirpans in California Schools: The Social Construction of Symbols, Legal Pluralism, and the Politics of Diversity’ (1996) 22 Amerasia Journal 57–89

B. Z. Tamanaha , A General Jurisprudence of Law and Society (Oxford University Press, 2001).

E. Melissaris , ‘The More the Merrier? A New Take on Legal Pluralism’ (2004) 13 Social and Legal Studies 57

M. Koskenniemi , ‘Hierarchy in International Law : A Sketch’ (1997) 8 European Journal of International Law 566–82

B. Sousa Santos , ‘Law: A Map of Misreading. Toward a Post-modern Conception of Law’ (1987) 14 (3) Journal of Law and Society 279–302.

P. Fitzpatrick , Modernism and the Grounds of Law (Cambridge University Press, 2001)

S. Motha , ‘The Sovereign Event in a Nation's Law’ (2002) 13 Law and Critique 311

D. Cooper , Challenging Diversity: Rethinking Equality and the Value of Difference (Cambridge University Press, 2004).

M. Koskenniemi , ‘“By Their Acts You Shall Know Them. . . ” (And Not by Their Legal Theories)’ (2004) 15 (4) European Journal of International Law 839–51.

D. Cooper , ‘Against the Current: Social Pathways and the Pursuit of Enduring Change’ (2001) 9 Feminist Legal Studies 119–48.

J. Conaghan , ‘Reassessing the Feminist Theoretical Project in Law’ (2001) 27 Journal of Law and Society 351–385 at 383.

K. K. Bailey , ‘The Enactment of Tennessee's Antievolution Law’ (1950) 16 The Journal of Southern History 472.

T. Fessenden , ‘The Nineteenth-Century Bible Wars and the Separation of Church and State’ (2005) 74 Church History 784 at 785.

C. F. Adams , ‘The Sifted Grain and the Grain Sifters’ (1901) 6 American Historical Review 197

M. Ruse , The Evolution-Creation Struggle (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005), p. 154.

F.-C. Cole , ‘A Witness at the Scopes Trial’ (1959) 200(1) Scientific American 120

J. Gilbert , Redeeming Culture, American Religion in the Age of Science (Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1997), p. 31.

H. Kalven , ‘A Commemorative Case Note, Scopes v State’ (1960) 27 The University of Chicago Law Review 505 at 508

S. Ingber , ‘Religion or Ideology: A Needed Clarification of the Religion Clauses’ (1989) 41 Stanford Law Review 233 at 260.

C. Luskin , ‘Alternative Viewpoints about Biological Origins as Taught in Public Schools’ (2005) 47 Journal of Church & State 583 at 591–4.

J. Waldron , ‘The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review’ (2006) 115 Yale Law Journal 1346

Waldron , ‘The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review’. The argument in this article builds upon a string of his earlier works, especially Law and Disagreement (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999) and The Dignity of Legislation (Cambridge University Press, 1999).

N. Doe , The Legal Framework of the Church of England: a Critical Study in a Comparative Context (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996)

J. P. Parry and S. Taylor , ‘Introduction: Parliament and the Church of England from the Reformation to the Twentieth Century’ (2000) 19 Parliamentary History 1–13.

T. Jenkins , ‘Two Sociological Approaches to Religion in Modern Britain’ (1996) 26 Religion 331–42

K. Medhurst , “The Church of England: a Progress Report” (1999) Parliamentary Affairs 275–90 at 289–90

J. Bradley , Religion, Revolution and English Radicalism (Cambridge University Press).

F. Knight , The Nineteenth Century Church and Society (Cambridge University Press, 1995).

Mole , ‘The Victorian Town Parish’ (16) Studies in Church History 361–71.

J. Behrens , “The Churchwardens Measure 2001” (2001) 6 Ecc. L.J. 97–110.

J. Heath , “Culture: Choice or Circumstances” (1998) 5:2 Constellations 183–200

W. Galston , “Value Pluralism and Liberal Political Theory” (1999) 93:4 American Political Science Review 769–78

R. Gavison , “Days of Worship and Days of Rest: The Case of Israel” in W. Brugger and M. Karayanni (eds.), Religion in the Public Sphere: A Comparative Analysis of German, Israeli, American and International Law (New York: Springer, 2007), pp: 379–414

C. K. Hadaway et al. “What the Polls Don't Show: A Closer Look at US Church Attendance” (1993) 58 American Sociological Review 741–52

M. McConnell , “Free Exercise Revisionism and the Smith Decision” (1990) University of Chicago Law Review 1109

M. Nussbaum , Woman and Human Development (Cambridge University Press, 2000), chapter 3

R. Patai , The Kingdom of Jordan (Princeton University Press, 1958) p: 223

N. Perez , “Should Multiculturalists Oppress the Oppressed?” (2002) 5(3) Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 51–79

M. I. Young , “Polity and Group Difference: A Critique of the Ideal of Universal Citizenship” (1989) 99(2) Ethics 250–74

W. Kymlicka , “Do We Need a Liberal Theory of Minority Rights? A Response to Carens, Young, Parekh and Forst” (1997) 4(1) Constellations 72–87

J. Waldron , “Cultural Identity and Civic Responsibility” in W. Kymlicka and W. Norman (eds.), Citizenship in Diverse Societies (Oxford University Press, 2000), pp: 155–74

W. Kymlicka , “Comments on Shachar and Spinner Halev: An Update from the Multiculturalism Wars” in C. Joppke and S. Lukes (eds.), Multicultural Questions (Oxford University Press, 1999), pp: 112–33

J. Carens , Culture, Citizenship, and Community (Oxford University Press, 2000)

A. Patten , “Liberal Neutrality and Language Policies” (2003) 31(4) Philosophy and Public Affairs 356–86

H. L. A Hart , “Social Solidarity and the Enforcement of Morals” (1967–8) 35 University of Chicago Law Review 1–13

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 255 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 394 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.