Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Learn to Write Badly
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 100
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Buy the print book

Book description

Modern academia is increasingly competitive yet the writing style of social scientists is routinely poor and continues to deteriorate. Are social science postgraduates being taught to write poorly? What conditions adversely affect the way they write? And which linguistic features contribute towards this bad writing? Michael Billig's witty and entertaining book analyses these questions in a quest to pinpoint exactly what is going wrong with the way social scientists write. Using examples from diverse fields such as linguistics, sociology and experimental social psychology, Billig shows how technical terminology is regularly less precise than simpler language. He demonstrates that there are linguistic problems with the noun-based terminology that social scientists habitually use - 'reification' or 'nominalization' rather than the corresponding verbs 'reify' or 'nominalize'. According to Billig, social scientists not only use their terminology to exaggerate and to conceal, but also to promote themselves and their work.

Reviews

‘Michael Billig makes important and novel arguments about the state of writing - and therefore the state of thinking - in the social sciences. This book presents detailed critiques of writings by a wide range of social scientists. Billig uses vivid examples to demonstrate the conditions in which bad writing is nurtured and to show its wider significance for academia and beyond. This is a highly entertaining read which had me laughing out loud at times.’

Christine Griffin - University of Bath

‘A wonderful look at the academic world and the kind of writing it encourages. I especially enjoyed the chapters on mass publication, sociology, and experimental social psychology.’

Tom Scheff - Professor Emeritus, University of California, Santa Barbara

‘If you are put off by the highly specialized, closed and boring technical prose that increasingly characterizes a good deal of contemporary social science, then Michael Billig shares your annoyance! A wise, informed and well-written account, showing just why so many social scientists write badly.’

John Van Maanen - Erwin H. Schell Professor of Organization Studies, MIT Sloan School of Management

‘Once again, Michael Billig has succeeded in challenging one of the characteristics of scholars’ writing in the social sciences which is usually taken for granted: the use of too much abstract jargon which mystifies and obfuscates the interpretation, reflection and explanation of our findings. In his brilliant, typically humorous but also cynical and accurate analysis of scholars’ narcissism, the author points to alternative ways of combining complex research with fundamental and necessary scholarly standards - while simultaneously making our work accessible to a broader public, in the spirit of true critical science.’

Ruth Wodak - Distinguished Professor and Chair in Discourse Studies, Lancaster University

'The Lynne Truss of the academic writing world … [Billig] reminds us all that when we put pen to paper we are supposed to be explaining things not hiding them … We should all read it and insist that our students do so as well.'

Source: The Times Higher Education Supplement

'My short review of this book would simply say, 'Buy it!' … The author presents his evidence effectively and with a great deal of humour … I could go on at length and produce some marvellous quotations from this book … I would like every budding author in the social sciences, every journal editor, and every referee, to read this book and take some action against the ills of academic writing.'

Tom Wilson Source: Information Research

'Michael Billig is writing from the inside as a professor of social sciences at Loughborough University: he knows all the tricks and poses, and examines them with a mix of cool detachment, warm humour and suitably dense footnoting.'

Gideon Haigh - 'Books of the Year', Spectator (Australia)

'[A] splendid book, which I’m going to make compulsory reading for anyone who crosses my path.'

Martin Parker Source: Organization

'[Billig's] argument will interest most academics, not merely those in the social sciences … any self-reflective academic or writer will benefit from reading his accomplished study.'

Luke Brunning Source: The Cambridge Humanities Review

'A highly respected researcher, Billig is well positioned to offer his critique … The book's apt, somewhat tongue-in-cheek illustrations cleverly prove Billig's claims … Essential. Graduate students, researchers, faculty.'

C. E. O'Neill Source: Choice

'… a thought-provoking manifesto for good writing.'

Helen Jones Source: Sociology

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

References
Abbott, A. (2001). The Chaos of Disciplines. University of Chicago Press.
Adler, R., Ewing, J. and Taylor, P. (2008). ‘Joint Committee on Quantitative Assessment of Research: Citation Statistics’. The Australian Mathematical Society Gazette, 35: 168–88.
Allan, K. (2001). Natural Language Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Allan, K. and Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge University Press.
Altbach, P. G. (1997). ‘Problems and Possibilities: The US Academic Profession’. In Finkelstein, M. J. and Altbach, P. G. (eds.), The Academic Profession. New York: Routledge.
Altbach, P. G. (2005). ‘Patterns in Higher Education Development’. In Altbach, P. G., Berdahl, R. O. and Gumport, P. J. (eds.), American Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L. and Rumbley, L. E. (2009). Trends in Global Higher Education: Tracking an Academic Revolution. Paris: UNESCO.
Andreski, S. (1971). Social Sciences as Sorcery. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Anonymous. (1854). ‘The Principle of the Grecian Mythology: Or How the Greeks Made Their Gods’. Fraser’s Magazine, 49, 69–79.
Antaki, C., Billig, M., Edwards, D. and Potter, J. (2007). ‘Discourse Analysis Means Doing Analysis: A Critique of Six Analytic Shortcomings’. In Potter, J. (ed.), Discourse and Psychology, Vol. 1. London: Sage.
Arendt, H. (1963). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report into the Banality of Evil. New York: Viking Press.
Banks, D. (2003). ‘The Evolution of Grammatical Metaphor in Scientific Writing’. In Simon-Vandenbergen, A. M., Tzaverniers, M. and Ravelli, L. (eds.), Grammatical Metaphor. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bargh, J. A. (2006). ‘What Have We Been Priming All These Years? On the Development, Mechanisms, and Ecology of Nonconscious Social Behaviour’. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36: 147–68.
Bargh, J. A., Chen, M. and Burrows, L. (1996). ‘Automaticity of Social Behaviour: Direct Effects of Trait Construct and Stereotype Activation on Action’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71: 230–44.
Barlow, F. K., Louis, W. R. and Hewstone, M. (2009). ‘Rejected! Cognitions of Rejection and Intergroup Anxiety as Mediators of the Impact of Cross-group Friendships on Prejudice’. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48: 389–405.
Barthes, R. (1995). Roland Barthes. London: Papermac.
Bateson, G. (2000). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. University of Chicago Press.
Bazerman, C. (2006). ‘Distanced and Refined Selves: Educational Tensions in Writing with the Power of Knowledge’. In Hewings, M. (ed.), Academic Writing in Context. London: Continuum.
Becher, T. and Trowler, P. (2001). Academic Tribes and Territories. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Beck, U. and Sznaider, N. (2010). ‘Unpacking Cosmopolitanism for the Social Sciences: A Research Agenda’. British Journal of Sociology, 61: 381–403.
Becker, S. L. (1999). ‘Looking Forwards, Looking Backwards: A Personal Perspective’. Communication Studies, 50: 22–7.
Belcher, W. (2009). Writing Your Journal Article in Twelve Weeks: A Guide to Academic Publishing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bellquist, J. E. (1993). A Guide to Grammar and Usage for Psychology and Related Fields. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bem, D. J. (1987). ‘Writing the Empirical Journal Article’. In Zanna, M. P. and Darley, J. M. (eds.), The Compleat Academic: A Practical Guide for the Beginning Social Scientist. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Berger, P. L. and Luckmann, T. (1967). The Social Construction of Reality. London: Allen Lane.
Berger, P. L. and Pullman, S. (1965). ‘Reification and the Sociological Critique of Consciousness’. History and Theory, 4: 196–211.
Bewes, T. (2002). Reification of the Anxiety of Late Capitalism. London: Verso.
Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing Genre. London: Longman.
Biber, D. (1988). Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge University Press.
Biber, D. (2003). ‘Compressed Noun-phrase Structures in Newspaper Discourse: The Competing Demands of Popularization vs Economy’. In Aitchison, J. and Lewis, D. M. (eds.), New Media Language. London: Routledge.
Biber, D. (2007). ‘Corpus-based Analyses of Discourse: Dimensions of Variation in Conversation’. In Bhatia, V. K., Flowerdew, J. and Jones, R. H. (eds.), Advances in Discourse Studies. Oxford: Routledge.
Biber, D. and Conrad, S. (2009). Register, Genre and Style. Cambridge University Press.
Biber, D. and Gray, B. (2010). ‘Challenging Stereotypes About Academic Writing: Complexity, Elaboration, Explicitness’. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9: 2–20.
Biber, D., Conrad, S. and Cortes, V. (2004). ‘If you look at . . . : Lexical Bundles in University Teaching and Textbooks’. Applied Linguistics, 25: 371–405.
Biber, D., Conrad, S. and Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
Billig, M. (1991). Ideology and Opinions. London: Sage Publications.
Billig, M. (1994). ‘Repopulating the Depopulated Pages of Social Psychology’. Theory and Psychology, 4: 307–35.
Billig, M. (1996). Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge University Press.
Billig, M. (1999). Freudian Repression. Cambridge University Press.
Billig, M. (2002). ‘Henri Tajfel’s “Cognitive Aspects of Prejudice” and the Psychology of Bigotry’. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41: 171–88.
Billig, M. (2006). ‘Lacan’s Misuse of Psychology: Evidence, Rhetoric and the Mirror Stage’. Theory, Culture and Society, 23(4): 1–26.
Billig, M. (2008a). ‘Social Representations and Repression: Examining the First Formulations of Freud and Moscovici’. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38: 355–68.
Billig, M. (2008b). ‘The Language of Critical Discourse Analysis: The Case of Nominalization’. Discourse & Society, 19: 783–800.
Billig, M. (2008c). ‘Nominalizing and De-nominalizing: A Reply’. Discourse & Society, 19: 829–41.
Billig, M. (2011). ‘Writing Social Psychology: Fictional Things and Unpopulated Texts’. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50: 4–20.
Billig, M. (2012). ‘Undisciplined Beginnings, Academic Success and Discursive Psychology’. British Journal of Social Psychology.
Blanshard, B. (1954). On Philosophical Style. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Blyth, A., Bamberg, J. and Toumbourou, J. (2000). BEST. Behaviour Exchange Systems Training: A Programme for Parents Stressed by Adolescent Substance Abuse. Camberwell, Victoria: ACER Press.
Bondy, A. S. and Frost, L. (2001). ‘The Picture Exchange Communication System’. Behavior Modification, 25: 725–44.
Bordens, K. S. and Horowitz, I. A. (2001). Social Psychology, 2nd edn. Mahwah, NJ: Psychology Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1993). Sociology in Question. London: Sage.
Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian Meditations. Oxford: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2003). Méditations pascaliennes. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J.-C. and de Saint Martin, M. (1996). Academic Discourse. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Brennan, J., Locke, W. and Naidoo, R. (2007). ‘United Kingdom: An Increasingly Differentiated Profession’. In Locke, W. and Teichler, U. (eds.), The Changing Conditions for Academic Work and Careers in Selected Countries. Kassel, Germany: International Centre for Higher Education Research.
Brown, R. (1995). Prejudice. Oxford: Blackwell.
Burawoy, M. (2005). ‘Provincializing the Social Sciences’. In Steinmetz, G. (ed.), The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences. Durham: Duke University Press.
Burawoy, M. (2009). ‘The Public Sociology Wars’. In Jeffries, V. (ed.), Handbook of Public Sociology. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Campbell, R. and Meadows, A. (2011). ‘Scholarly Journal Publishing: Where Do We Go from Here?Learned Publishing, 24: 171–81.
Chouliaraki, L. and Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in Late Modernity. Edinburgh University Press.
Coleman, J. (2009). ‘Slang and Cant Dictionaries’. In Cowie, A. P. (ed.), The Oxford History of English Lexicography, Vol. 1. Oxford University Press.
Couldry, N. (2008). ‘Mediatization or Mediation? Alternative Understandings of the Emergent Space of Digital Storytelling’. New Media Society, 10: 373–91.
Crane, D. and Small, H. (1992). ‘American Sociology Since the Seventies: The Emerging Identity Crisis in the Discipline’. In Halliday, T. C. and Janowitz, M. (eds.), Sociology and its Publics. University of Chicago Press.
Crisp, R. J. and Turner, R. N. (2010). Essential Social Psychology. London: Sage.
Culler, J. and Lamb, K. (2003a). ‘Introduction: Dressing Up, Dressing Down’. In Culler, J. and Lamb, K. (eds.), Just Being Difficult? Stanford University Press.
Culler, J. and Lamb, K. (eds.) (2003b). Just Being Difficult? Stanford University Press.
Cumming, G. (2008). ‘Replication and p Intervals: p Values Predict the Future Only Vaguely, but Confidence Intervals Do Much Better’. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3: 286–300.
Dahl, T. (2008). ‘Contributing to the Academic Conversation: A Study of New Knowledge Claims in Economics and Linguistics’. Journal of Pragmatics, 40: 1184–201.
Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the Mind. London: Sage.
Dawkins, R. (2003). A Devil’s Chaplain. London: Orion Books.
Deacon, D. (2012). ‘Mediatization and History’. Plenary talk delivered at Discourse, Communication, Conversation Conference, March 2012, Loughborough University.
Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society, 2nd edn. London: Sage.
De Quincey, T. (1863). Dr Samuel Parr or Whiggism and its Relation to Literature. Edinburgh: Adam and Charles Black.
Donald, J. G. (2009). ‘The Commons: Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Encounters’. In Kreber, C. (ed.), The University and its Disciplines. New York: Routledge.
Drury, J. and Reicher, S. (2000). ‘Collective Action and Social Change: The Emergence of New Social Identities’. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39: 579–604.
East, J. (2010). ‘Judging Plagiarism: A Problem of Morality and Convention’. Higher Education, 59: 69–83.
Economic and Social Research Council. (2009). Postgraduate Training and Development: Guidelines. Swindon: ESRC.
Editors (2003). ‘Editorial, May 2003’. Papers on Social Representations, 12: 3.1–3.2.
Edwards, D. (1991). ‘Categories Are for Talking’. Theory and Psychology, 1: 515–42.
Edwards, D. (2012). ‘Discursive and Scientific Psychology’. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51: 425–35.
Edwards, D. and Potter, J. (1993). Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.
English, F. (2002). Student Essays: An Academic Literacies Perspective. Subject Centre for Languages, Linguistics and Area Studies Good Practice Guide. Retrieved 28 May 2012, .
Ethier, C. R. and Simmons, C. A. (2007). Introductory Biomechanics. Cambridge University Press.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing Discourse. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2008a). ‘Critical Discourse Analysis and Nominalization: Reply to Michael Billig’. Discourse & Society, 19: 811–20.
Fairclough, N. (2008b). ‘A Brief Response to Billig’. Discourse & Society, 19, 843–4.
Fairclough, N., Mulderig, J. and Wodak, R. (2011). ‘Critical Discourse Analysis’. In van Dijk, T. A. (ed.), Discourse Studies, 2nd edn. London: Sage.
Fisher, J. C. (1991). ‘A Short Glossary of Laser Terminology for Physicians and Surgeons’. Journal of Clinical Laser Medicine and Surgery, 9: 345–8.
Flowerdew, L. (2007). ‘Corpora and Context in Professional Writing’. In Bhatia, V. K., Flowerdew, J. and Jones, R. H. (eds.), Advances in Discourse Studies. London: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (1979). ‘On Governmentality’. Ideology & Consciousness, 6: 5–21.
Foucault, M. (2000). ‘Governmentality’. In Foucault, M., Power: Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, Vol. 3. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Foucault, M. (2004). Sécurité, Territoire, Population: Cours au Collège de France (1977–1978). Paris: Gallimard.
Foucault, M. (2009). Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–1978. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the News. London: Routledge.
Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G. and Trew, T. (1979). Language and Control. London: Routledge.
Freud, S. (1914/1993). ‘On the History of the Psychoanalytic Movement’. In Freud, S., Historical and Expository Works on Psychoanalysis. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Freud, S. and Breuer, J. (1895/1952). ‘Stüdien über Hysterie’. In Freud, S., Gesammelte Werke, Vol. 1. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer.
Freud, S. and Breuer, J. (1895/1991). Studies on Hysteria. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Frey, B. S. (2003). ‘Publishing as Prostitution? Choosing Between One’s Own Ideas and Academic Success’. Public Choice, 116: 205–23.
Garbutt, R. (2009). ‘Is There a Place Within Academic Journals for Articles Presented in an Accessible Format?Disability & Society, 24: 357–71.
Gascoigne, T. and Metcalfe, J. (2005). ‘Commercialisation of Research Activities in the Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences in Australia’. Occasional paper of Council for Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, Department of Education, Science and Training, Australia.
Gemme, B. and Gingras, Y. (2009). ‘The New Production of Researchers’. In Chan, A. S. and Fisher, D. (eds.), The Exchange University: Corporatization of Academic Culture. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.
Gibson, S. (in press). ‘Milgram’s Obedience Experiments: A Rhetorical Analysis’. British Journal of Social Psychology.
Gigerenzer, G. (2004). ‘Mindless Statistics’. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 33: 587–606.
Gigerenzer, G. (2006). ‘What’s in a Sample? A Manual for Building Cognitive Theories’. In Fiedler, K. and Juslin, P. (eds.), Information Sampling and Adaptive Cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gigerenzer, G. (2010). ‘Personal Reflections on “Theory and Psychology”’. Theory & Psychology, 20: 733–43.
Gigerenzer, G. and Brighton, H. (2009). ‘Homo Heuristicus: Why Biased Minds Make Better Inferences’. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1: 107–43.
Grafton, A. (2010). ‘Britain: The Disgrace of the Universities’. The New York Review of Books, 8 April.
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Greenland, K. and Brown, R. (2000). ‘Categorization and Intergroup Anxiety in Intergroup Conflict’. In Capozza, D. and Brown, R. (eds.), Social Identity Processes. London: Sage.
Grose, F. (1785/1963). A Classical Dictionary of the Vulgar Tongue, edited by Partridge, E.. New York: Barnes and Noble.
Grubrich-Simitis, I. (1997). Early Freud and Late Freud. London: Routledge.
Grünbaum, A. (1998). ‘A Century of Psychoanalysis: Critical Retrospect and Prospect’. In Roth, M. S. (ed.), Freud: Conflict and Culture. New York: Alfred Knopf.
Gumport, P. J., Iannozz, M., Shaman, S. and Zemsky, R. (1997). Trends in United States Education from Massification to Post Massification. Stanford, CA: National Center for Postsecondary Improvement.
Halliday, M. A. K. (2003). On Language and Linguistics. London: Continuum.
Halliday, M. A. K. (2006). The Language of Science. London: Continuum.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing Science. London: Falmer Press.
Hearn, J. C. (2007). ‘Sociological Studies of Academic Departments’. In Gumport, P. J. (ed.), Sociology of Higher Education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Heritage, J. and Greatbach, D. (1986). ‘Generating Applause: A Study of Rhetoric and Response at Party Political Conferences’. American Journal of Sociology, 92: 110–57.
Hewings, A. and Hewings, M. (2006). ‘Anticipatory “It” in Academic Writing: An Indicator of Disciplinary Difference and Developing Disciplinary Knowledge’. In Hewings, M. (ed.), Academic Writing in Context. London: Continuum.
Heywood, A. (2006). Key Concepts in Politics. New York: St Martin’s Press.
Hilsdon, J. (1997). ‘Nominalisation in the Classroom: Issues of Power and Identity’. International Journal of Educational Development, 17: 417–25.
Hitchings, H. (2005). Defining the World: The Extraordinary Story of Dr Johnson’s Dictionary. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
Hogg, M. A. (2010). ‘Influence and Leadership’. In Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. T. and Lindzey, G. (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, 5th edn. New York: Wiley.
Hogg, M. A. and Vaughan, G. M. (2011). Social Psychology, 6th edn. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
Holmes, R. (1997). ‘Genre Analysis and the Social Sciences: An Investigation of the Structure of Research Article Discussion Sections in Three Disciplines’. English for Specific Purposes, 16: 321–7.
Honneth, A. (1995). The Struggle for Recognition. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Honneth, A. (2008). Reification: A New Look at an Old Idea. Oxford University Press.
Hood, S. and Forey, G. (2005). ‘Introducing a Conference Paper: Getting Interpersonal With Your Audience’. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4: 291–306.
Huang, M. and Chang, Y. (2008). ‘Characteristics of Research Output in Social Sciences and Humanities: From a Research Evaluation Perspective’. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59: 1819–28.
Hudson, G. (1999). Essential Introductory Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hundt, M. (2007). English Mediopassive Constructions. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.
Hundt, M. (2009). ‘“Curtains Like These are Selling Right in the City of Chicago for $1.50” – The Mediopassive in American 20th-century Advertising Language’. Language and Computers, 69: 163–83.
Hutchby, I. and Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hyland, K. (2001). ‘Humble Servants of the Discipline? Self-mention in Research Articles’. English for Specific Purposes, 20: 207–26.
Hyland, K. (2005). ‘Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse’. Discourse Studies, 7: 173–92.
Hyland, K. (2009). Academic Discourse. London: Continuum.
Hyland, K. and Tse, P. (2007). ‘Is There an “Academic Vocabulary”?TESOL Quarterly, 41: 235–53.
James, C. L. R. (1963). Beyond a Boundary. London: Stanley Paul.
James, W. (1890). Principles of Psychology. London: Macmillan.
James, W. (1899). Talks to Teachers. London: Longmans, Green and Co.
James, W. (1911). Memories and Studies. London: Longmans, Green and Co.
James, W. (1920). The Letters of William James, edited by James, H.. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.
Jary, D. (1997). ‘A Brief Guide to “Difficult” Sociological Jargon’. In Ballard, C., Gubbay, J. and Middleton, C. (eds.), The Student’s Companion to Sociology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Jinha, A. E. (2010). ‘Article 50 Million: An Estimate on the Number of Scholarly Articles in Existence’. Learned Publishing, 23: 258–63.
Johns, T. (2006). ‘From Evidence to Conclusion: The Case of “Indicate That”’. In Hewings, M. (ed.), Academic Writing in Context. London: Continuum.
Katzko, M. W. (2006). ‘A Study of the Logic of Empirical Arguments in Psychological Research: “The Automacity of Social Behaviour” as a Case Study’. Review of General Psychology, 10: 210–28.
Kitchin, R. and Fuller, D. (2005). The Academic’s Guide to Publishing. London: Sage.
Kivinen, O., Hedman, J. and Kaipainen, P. (2007). ‘From Elite University to Mass Higher Education: Educational Expansion, Equality of Opportunity and Returns to University Education’. Acta Sociologica, 50: 231–47.
Klinenberg, E. (2005). ‘Convergence: News Production in a Digital Age’. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 597: 48–64.
Knoch, U. (2007). ‘“Little Coherence, Considerable Strain for Reader”: A Comparison of Two Rating Scales for the Assessment of Coherence’. Assessing Writing, 12: 108–28.
Knowles, C. (2010). ‘Mobile Sociology’. British Journal of Sociology, 61: 373–9.
Kousha, K. and Thelwell, M. (2009). ‘Google Book Search: Citation Analysis for Social Science and the Humanities’. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60: 1537–49.
Kreber, C. (ed.) (2009). The University and its Disciplines. New York: Routledge.
Kyvik, S. (2003). ‘Changing Trends in Publishing Behaviour Among University Faculty, 1980–2000’. Scientometrics, 58: 35–48.
Kyvik, S. and Skodkin, O.-J. (2003). ‘Research in the Non-university Higher Education Sector: Tensions and Dilemmas’. Higher Education, 45: 203–22.
Lambdin, C. (2012). ‘Significance Tests as Sorcery: Science is Empirical – Statistical Tests are Not’. Theory & Psychology, 22: 67–90.
Laplanche, J. and Pontalis, J.-B. (1983). The Language of Psycho-Analysis. London: Hogarth Press.
Lea, M. R. and Street, B. V. (1998). ‘Student Writing in Higher Education: An Academic Literacies Approach’. Studies in Higher Education, 23: 157–72.
Lee, J. J., Cheslock, J., Maldonado-Maldonado, A. and Rhoades, G. (2005). ‘Professors as Knowledge Workers in the New Global Economy’. In Smart, J. C. (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. XX. Dordrecht: Springer.
Lee, S. H. (2010). ‘Command Strategies for Balancing Respect and Authority in Undergraduate Expository Essays’. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9: 61–75.
Leech, G. (2006). A Glossary of English Grammar. Edinburgh University Press.
Leech, G., Hundt, M., Mair, C. and Smith, N. (2009). Change in Contemporary English. Cambridge University Press.
Lemke, J. L. (1995). Textual Politics: Discourse and Social Dynamics. London: Taylor and Francis.
Lemke, T. (2002). ‘Foucault, Governmentality and Critique’. Rethinking Marxism, 14(3): 49–64.
Lemke, T. (2007). ‘An Indigestible Meal? Foucault, Governmentality and State Theory’. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 15: 43–66.
Liddicoat, A. J. (2007). An Introduction to Conversation Analysis. London: Continuum.
Lillis, T. and Scott, M. (2007). ‘Defining Academic Literacies Research: Issues of Epistemology, Ideology and Strategy’. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4: 5–32.
Locke, W. (2008). ‘The Academic Profession in England: Still Stratified After All These Years?’ In Research Institute for Higher Education, The Changing Academic Profession. Hiroshima University.
Lomas, L. (2001). ‘Does the Development of Mass Education Necessarily Mean the End of Quality?’ Paper given at Sixth QHE seminar, Birmingham, May 2001.
Lukács, G. (1923/1971). History and Class Consciousness. London: Merlin Press.
Lundby, K. (2009). ‘Introduction: “Mediatization” as Key’. In Lundby, K. (ed.), Mediatization. New York: Peter Lang.
Marková, I. (2003). Dialogicality and Social Representations. Cambridge University Press.
Marková, I. (2008). ‘The Epistemological Significance of the Theory of Social Representations’. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38: 461–87.
Martin, J. R. (2008). ‘Incongruent and Proud: De-vilifying “Nominalization”’. Discourse & Society, 19: 801–10.
Martinez, I. A., Beck, S. C. and Panza, C. B. (2009). ‘Academic Vocabulary in Agriculture Research Articles: A Corpus-based Study’. English for Specific Purposes, 28: 183–98.
Marton, F. (1986). ‘Phenomenography: A Research Approach Investigating Different Understandings of Reality’. Journal of Thought, 21: 28–49.
Marton, F. (1994). ‘Phenomenography’. In Husén, T. and Postlethwaite, T. N. (eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Education, Vol. 8. Oxford: Pergamon.
Marx, K. (1894/1959). Capital, Vol. III. New York: International Publishers.
Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1846/1970). The German Ideology. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Master, P. (2006). ‘Active Verbs With Inanimate Subjects in Scientific Research Articles’. In Hewings, M. (ed.), Academic Writing in Context. London: Continuum.
Mautner, G. (2005). ‘For-profit Discourse in the Nonprofit and Public Sectors’. In Erreygers, G. and Jacobs, G. (eds.), Language, Communication and the Economy. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
McLellan, D. (1973). Karl Marx: His Life and Thought. London: Macmillan.
McLennan, G. (2003). ‘Sociological Complexity’. Sociology, 37: 547–64.
McMillan, K. and Weyers, J. (2010). How to Write Essays and Assignments. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
Meehl, P. E. (1978). ‘Theoretical Risks and Tabular Asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the Slow Progress of Soft Psychology’. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46: 806–34.
Meehl, P. E. (1990). Selected Philosophical and Methodological Papers. University of Minnesota Press.
Mercer, N. (1996). ‘Using English at Work’. In Maybin, J. and Mercer, N. (eds.), Using English from Conversation to Canon. Oxford: Routledge.
Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to Authority. New York: Harper & Row.
Mohamedbhai, G. (2008). The Effects of Massification on Higher Education in Africa. Accra: Association of African Universities.
Moon, C. (2010). ‘The British Journal of Sociology in the 1990s: Disintegration and Disarray?British Journal of Sociology, 61: 261–9.
Moscovici, S. (1961). La Psychanalyse: son image et son public. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Moscovici, S. (1963). ‘Attitudes and Opinions’. Annual Review of Psychology, 14: 231–60.
Moscovici, S. (2000). Social Representations: Studies in Social Psychology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Moxley, J. M. (1992). Publish, Don’t Perish: The Scholar’s Guide to Academic Writing and Publishing. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Muntigl, P. (2002). ‘Politicization and Depoliticization: Employment Policy in the European Union’. In Chilton, P. and Schäffner, C. (eds.), Politics as Talk and Text. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Murray, J. (2008). Now That’s What I Call Jargon. Dublin: New Island Books.
Myers, G. (2006). ‘“In My Opinion”: The Place of Personal Views in Undergraduate Essays’. In Hewings, M. (ed.), Academic Writing in Context. London: Continuum.
Nash, W. (1993). Jargon. Oxford: Blackwell.
Ngok, K. (2008). ‘Massification, Bureaucratization and Questing for “World-Class” Status: Higher Education in China since the Mid-1990s’. International Journal of Educational Management, 22: 547–64.
Nichols, T. (2005). ‘Industry’. In Bennett, T., Grossberg, L. and Morris, M. (eds.), New Keywords. Oxford: Blackwell.
Northey, M., Tepperman, L. and Russell, J. (2002). Making Sense in the Social Sciences: A Student’s Guide to Research and Writing. Ontario: Oxford University Press.
O’Leary, Z. (2007). The Social Science Jargon Buster: The Key Terms You Need to Know. London: Sage.
Okulska, U. and Cap, P. (2010). ‘Analysis and Political Discourse: Landmarks, Challenges and Prospects’. In Okulska, U. and Cap, P. (eds.), Perspectives in Politics and Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Orwell, G. (1946/1975). ‘Politics and the English Language’. In Orwell, G., Inside the Whale and Other Essays. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Orwell, G. (1949/2008). Nineteen Eighty-Four. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Osborne, T. and Rose, N. (1999). ‘Do the Social Sciences Create Phenomena? The Example of Public Opinion Research’. British Journal of Sociology, 50: 367–96.
Pahta, P. and Taavitsainen, I. (eds.). (2004). Medical and Scientific Writing in Late Mediaeval English. Cambridge University Press.
Parakh, P., Hindy, P. and Fruthcher, G. (2011). ‘Are We Speaking the Same Language? Acronyms in Gastroenterology’. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 106: 8–9.
Pepitone, A. (1999). ‘Historical Sketches and Critical Commentary About Social Psychology in the Golden Age’. In Rodrigues, A. and Levine, R. (eds.), Reflections on 100 Years of Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Basic Books.
Poole, G. (2009). ‘Academic Disciplines: Homes or Barricades?’ In Kreber, C. (ed.), The University and its Disciplines. New York: Routledge.
Potter, J. (2012). ‘Rereading “Discourse and Social Psychology”: Transforming Social Psychology’. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51: 436–59.
Prior, P. A. (1998). Writing/Disciplinarity: A Sociohistoric Account of Literate Activity in the Academy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Prior, P. A. (2005). ‘Re-situating and Re-mediating the Canons – Reflections on Writing Research and Rhetoric’. Plenary talk at Conference on Writing Research in the Making. Santa Barbara, California, 6 February.
Prosser, M. and Webb, C. (1994). ‘Relating the Process of Undergraduate Essay Writing to the Finished Product’. Studies in Higher Education, 19: 125–38.
Rapport, N. and Overing, J. (2006). Social and Cultural Anthropology: The Key Concepts. London: Routledge.
Reicher, S. (2011). ‘Promoting a Culture of Innovation: BJSP and the Emergence of New Paradigms in Social Psychology’. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50: 391–8.
Reider, B. (2008). ‘Acronyms and Anachronisms’. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 36, 2081–2.
Reynolds, J. (2010). ‘Writing in the Discipline of Anthropology – Theoretic, Thematic and Geographic Spaces’. Studies in Higher Education, 35: 11–24.
Richardson, R. D. (2007). William James: In the Maelstrom of American Modernism. Boston, MA: Mariner.
Rocco, T. S. (2011). ‘Reasons to Write, Writing Opportunities and Other Considerations’. In Rocco, T. S. and Hatcher, T. (eds.), The Handbook of Scholarly Writing and Publishing. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Rose, N. (1996). Inventing Our Selves. Cambridge University Press.
Rose, N. and Miller, P. (2010). ‘Political Power Beyond the State: Problematics of Government’. British Journal of Sociology, 61: 271–303.
Rose, N., O’Malley, P. and Valverde, M. (2006). ‘Governmentality’. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2: 83–104.
Rowley-Jolivet, E. and Carter-Thomas, S. (2005). ‘The Rhetoric of Conference Presentation Introductions’. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15: 45–71.
Rumbley, L., Pacheco, I. and Altbach, P. G. (2008). International Comparison of Academic Salaries: An Exploratory Study. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College Center for International Higher Education.
Russell, D. R. (2002). Writing in the Academic Disciplines. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Sacks, H. (1984). ‘On Doing “Being Ordinary”’. In Atkinson, J. M. and Heritage, J. (eds.), Structures of Social Action. Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, H. (1995). Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. and Jefferson, G. (1974). ‘A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation’. Language, 50: 696–735.
Sánchez, D. and Isern, D. (2011). ‘Automatic Extraction of Acronym Definition from the Web’. Applied Intelligence, 34: 311–27.
Schafer, R. (1976). A New Language for Psychoanalysis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Schaffer, R. (2006). Key Concepts in Developmental Psychology. London: Sage.
Scheff, T. J. (1990). Microsociology. University of Chicago Press.
Scheff, T. J. (1997). Emotions, the Social Bond and Human Reality. Cambridge University Press.
Scheff, T. J. (2006). Goffman Unbound! A New Paradigm for Social Science. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
Scheff, T. J. and Fearon, D. S.. (2004). ‘Cognition and Emotion? The Dead End in Self-esteem Research’. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 34: 73–90.
Schegloff, E. (2000). ‘Overlapping Talk and the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation’. Language and Society, 29: 1–63.
Schroder, K. C. (2002). ‘Discourses of Fact’. In Jensen, K. B. (ed.), Handbook of Media and Communication Research. London: Routledge.
Schulz, W. (2004). ‘Reconstructing Mediatization as an Analytical Concept’. European Journal of Communication, 19: 87–101.
Schuster, J. H. and Finkelstein, M. J. (2008). The American Faculty. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Scott, J. (2005). ‘Sociology and its Others: Reflections on Disciplinary Specialisation and Fragmentation’. Sociological Research Online, 10: 1. Retrieved 28 May 2012, .
Scott, J. (2006). Sociology: The Key Concepts. Oxford: Routledge.
Scott-Lichter, D. (2011). ‘Got Content, Get Attention’. Learned Publishing, 24: 245–6.
Sennett, R. and Cobb, J. (1993). The Hidden Injuries of Class. New York: W. W. Norton.
Shalit, I. and Bargh, J. A. (2011). ‘Use of Priming-based Interventions to Facilitate Psychological Health: Commentary of Kazdin and Blasé’. Perspectives on Psychological Sciences, 6: 488–92.
Shaw, P. and Vassileva, I. (2009). ‘Co-Evolving Academic Rhetoric Across Culture: Britain, Bulgaria, Denmark, Germany in the 20th Century’. Journal of Pragmatics, 41: 290–305.
Shore, C. and Wright, S. (2000). ‘Coercive Accountability: The Rise of the Audit Culture in Higher Education’. In Stathern, M. (ed.), Audit Cultures. London: Routledge.
Slaughter, S. and Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic Capitalism and the New Economy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Slaughter, S. and Rhoades, G. (2009). ‘The Academic Capitalist Knowledge/Learning Regime’. In Chan, A. S. and Fisher, D. (eds.), The Exchange University: Corporatization of Academic Culture. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.
Smart, L. E. and Moore, A. E. (2005). Solid State Chemistry: An Introduction, 3rd edn. London: Taylor and Francis.
Smeby, J.-C. (2003). ‘The Impact of Massification on University Research’. Tertiary Education and Management, 9: 131–44.
Smith, E. R. and Mackie, D. M. (2000). Social Psychology, 2nd edn. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
Smyth, M. M. (2001). ‘Fact Making in Psychology: The Voice of the Introductory Textbook’. Theory & Psychology, 11: 609–36.
Sokal, A. D. (2010). Beyond the Hoax: Science, Philosophy and Culture. Oxford University Press.
Sokal, A. D. and Bricmont, J. (1999). Fashionable Nonsense. New York: St Martin’s Press.
Souder, L. (2011). ‘The Ethics of Scholarly Peer Review: A Review of the Literature’. Learned Publishing, 24: 55–74.
Spears, R. (1995). ‘Social Categorization’. In Manstead, A. S. R. and Hewstone, M. (eds.), The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Stanley, L. (2005). ‘A Child of its Time: Hybridic Perspectives on Othering in Sociology’. Sociological Research Online, 10, 3. Retrieved 28 May 2012, .
Starfield, S. (2004). ‘Word Power: Negotiating Success in a First-year Sociology Essay’. In Ravelli, L. J. and Ellis, R. A. (eds.), Analysing Academic Writing. London: Continuum.
Steele, C. (2006). ‘Book to the Future: Twenty-first-century Models for the Scholarly Monograph’. In Bernhardt, B. R., Daniels, T., Steinle, K. and Strauch, K. (eds.), Charleston Conference Proceedings 2005. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
Stroebe, W., Hewstone, M. and Jonas, K. (2008). ‘Introducing Social Psychology’. In Hewstone, M., Stroebe, W. and Jonas, K. (eds.), Introduction to Social Psychology. Oxford: BPS Blackwell.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. (2006). Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge University Press.
Tajfel, H. (1969). ‘Cognitive Aspects of Prejudice’. Journal of Biosocial Science, Supplement 1: 173–91.
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human Groups and Social Categories. Cambridge University Press.
Tajfel, H., Billig, M., Bundy, R. P. and Flament, C. (1971). ‘Social Categorization and Intergroup Behaviour’. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1: 149–78.
Tang, R. and Suganthi, J. (1999). ‘The “I” in Identity: Exploring Writer Identity in Student Academic Essays Through the First Person Pronoun. English for Specific Purposes, 18, Supplement 1, S23–S39.
Tarrant, M., Dazely, S. and Cottom, T. (2009). ‘Social Categorization and Empathy for Outgroup Members’. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48: 427–46.
ten Have, P. (2009). ‘Conversation Analysis: Analysing Everyday Conversations’. In Jacobsen, M. H. (ed.), Encountering the Everyday. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tenopir, C., Allard, S., Bates, B. J., Levine, K. J., Kings, D. W., Birch, B., Mays, R. and Caldwell, C. (2011). ‘Perceived Value of Scholarly Articles’. Learned Publishing, 24: 123–32.
Thomas, L. (2005). Widening Participation in Post-Compulsory Education. London: Continuum.
Thompson, J. B. (1995). The Media and Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Thompson, J. B. (2005). Books in the Digital Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Thorne, T. (2006). Shoot the Puppy: A Survival Guide to the Curious Jargon of Modern Life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Todd, R. W. (2003). ‘EAP or TEAP?Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2: 147–56.
Tracy, K. (1997). Colloquium: Dilemmas of Academic Discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Trow, M. A. (2000). From Mass Higher Education to Universal Access: The American Advantage. Berkeley, CA: Center for Studies in Higher Education.
Trow, M. A. (2005). ‘Reflections on the Transition From Elite to Mass to Universal Access: Forms and Phases of Higher Education in Modern Societies since WWII’. University of California at Berkeley: Institute of Government Studies. Retrieved 28 May 2012, .
Tucker, A. (1768). The Light of Nature Pursued, Vol. 1, Part I. London: T. Payne.
Turner, J. C. (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group. Oxford: Blackwell.
University Standards Report (2009). Students and Universities. Westminster, London: Innovation, Universities, Science and Skills Committee, House of Commons.
Urry, J. (2000). Sociology Beyond Societies. London: Sage.
Urry, J. (2010). ‘Mobile Sociology’. British Journal of Sociology, 61: 347–66.
Vaihinger, H. (1924/2009). The Philosophy of ‘As If’. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Valsiner, J. and van der Veer, R. (2000). The Social Mind. Cambridge University Press.
van Dijk, T. A. (2003). ‘Critical Discourse Analysis’. In Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D. and Hamilton, H. E. (eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
van Dijk, T. A. (2008). ‘Critical Discourse Analysis and Nominalization: Problem or Pseudo-problem?’. Discourse & Society, 19: 821–8.
van Dijk, T. A. (2010). ‘Critical Discourse Studies: A Sociocognitive Approach’. In Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.
van Leeuwen, T. (2010). ‘Discourse as the Recontextualization of Social Practice: A Guide’. In Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.
van Leeuwen, T. and Kress, G. (2011). ‘Discourse Semantics’. In van Dijk, T. A. (ed.), Discourse Studies, 2nd edn. London: Sage.
Waldo, M. L. (2004). Demythologizing Language Difference in the Academy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wells, B. and Macfarlane, S. (1998). ‘Prosody as an Interactional Resource: Turn-projection and Overlap’. Language and Speech, 41: 265–94.
Wheen, F. (2004). How Mumbo-Jumbo Conquered the World. London: Harper Perennial.
Wodak, R. (2006). ‘Critical Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis’. In Östman, J.-O. and Verschueren, J. (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (2010). ‘Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory and Methodology’. In Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.
Wooffitt, R. (2001). ‘Researching Psychic Practitioners: Conversation Analysis’. In Wetherell, M., Taylor, S. and Yates, S. J. (eds.), Discourse as Data. London: Sage.
Yule, G. (2010). The Study of Language. Cambridge University Press.
Zijderveld, A. C. (1979). On Clichés. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Ziliak, S. T. and McCloskey, D. N. (2008). The Cult of Statistical Significance. University of Michigan Press.
Zimbardo, P. G. (1969). ‘The Human Choice: Individuation, Reason and Order Versus Deindividuation, Impulse and Chaos’. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 17: 237–307.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed