Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Making Global Policy
  • Cited by 40
    • Reviews and endorsements for this Element.
      • Show more authors
      • Open Access
      You have digital access to this book
    • Select format
    • Publisher:
      Cambridge University Press
      Publication date:
      22 November 2019
      12 December 2019
      ISBN:
      9781108661690
      9781108724753
      DOI:
      https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108661690
      Creative Commons:
      Creative Common License - CC Creative Common License - BY Creative Common License - NC Creative Common License - ND
      This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0.
      https://creativecommons.org/creativelicenses
      Dimensions:
      Weight & Pages:
      Dimensions:
      (229 x 152 mm)
      Weight & Pages:
      0.2kg, 98 Pages
      • Subjects:
      Political Economy, Politics and International Relations, Comparative Politics
      Series:
      Elements in Public Policy
    Open Access
    You have digital access to this book
    Selected: Digital
    View content
    Add to cart View cart Buy from Cambridge.org
    Subjects:
    Political Economy, Politics and International Relations, Comparative Politics
    Series:
    Elements in Public Policy
    Information

    Book description

    Global policy making is taking shape in a wide range of public sector activities managed by transnational policy communities. Public policy scholars have long recognised the impact of globalisation on the industrialised knowledge economies of OECD states, as well as on social and economic policy challenges faced by developing and transition states. But the focus has been on domestic politics and policy. Today, policy studies literature is building new concepts of 'transnational public-private partnership', 'trans-governmentalism' and 'science diplomacy' to account for rapid growth of global policy networks and informal international organisations delivering public goods and services. This Element goes beyond traditional texts which focus on public policy as an activity of states to outline how global policy making has driven many global and regional transformations over the past quarter-century. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.

    Reviews

    ‘Stone’s book is fundamental for approaching the analysis of the global commons (from climate to data) that will define the future of the planet.’

    Claudio M. Radaelli Source: Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice

    References

    References

    Agerskov, A. H. (2005, May) ‘Global public goods and development – a guide for policy makers’, in Seminar Number 6: World Bank Seminar Series at Kobe and Hiroshima Universities. Global Development Challenges Facing Humanity. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTABOUTUS/Resources/PublicGoods.pdf
    Alimi, D. (2015) ‘“Going global”: Policy entrepreneurship of the Global Commission on Drug Policy’, Public Administration, 93(4):874–89.
    ALLEA (2018) ‘All European academies response to Plan S’, December, www.allea.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/ALLEA_Response_PlanS.pdf
    Andia, T., & Chorev, N. (2017) ‘Making knowledge legitimate: transnational advocacy networks’ campaigns against tobacco, infant formula and pharmaceuticals’, Global Networks, 17(2):255–80.
    Andonova, L. B. (2017) Governance Entrepreneurs: International Organizations and the Rise of Global Public–Private Partnerships. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Anonymous (2018) Notes on Science Counsellors Meeting, November, Brussels.
    Babb, S. (2013) ‘The Washington Consensus as transnational policy paradigm: Its origins, trajectory and likely successor’, Review of International Political Economy, 20(2):268–97.
    Bäckstrand, K., and Kylsäter, M. (2014) ‘Old wine in new bottles? The legitimation and delegitimation of UN public–private partnerships for sustainable development from the Johannesburg Summit to the Rio+ 20 Summit’, Globalizations, 11(3):331–47.
    Bäckstrand, K., Campe, S., Chan, S., Mert, A., and Schäferhoff, M. (2012) ‘Transnational public–private partnerships’, in Bierman, F., and Pattberg, P. (Eds) Global Environmental Governance Reconsidered. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Bauer, M. W., Ege, J., and Schomaker, R. (2018) ‘The challenge of administrative internationalization: Taking stock and looking ahead’, International Journal of Public Administration, 42(11):904–17.
    Bauman, E., and Miller, S. D. (2012) Comprehensive Literature Review of Global Public Policy: Creating a Framework for Understanding Global Refugee Policy. Working Paper Series Number 87, Oxford: Refugee Studies Centre.
    Beisheim, M., and Ellersiek, A. (2017). ‘Partnerships for the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: transformative inclusive and accountable?’ Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, Berlin, SWP Research Paper 2017/14.
    Beisheim, M., and Simon, N. (2018) ‘Multistakeholder partnerships for the SDGs: actors’ views on UN metagovernance’, Global Governance, 24(4):497–515.
    Beveridge, R., and Naumann, M. (2014) ‘Global norms, local contestation: Privatisation and de/politicisation in Berlin’, Policy & Politics 42(2):275–91.
    Biermann, F. (2009) Managers of Global Change: The Influence of International Environmental Bureaucracies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Biermann, F., and Siebenhüner, B. (2013). ‘Problem solving by international bureaucracies’, in Reinalda, B. (Ed) Routledge Handbook of International Organization. London: Routledge.
    Birdsall, N., and Diofasi, A. (2015) Global Public Goods for Development: How Much and What For. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
    Birkland, T. A. (2016) An Introduction to the Policy Process: Theories, Concepts and Models of Public Policy Making, 4th edn. New York: Routledge.
    Bodansky, D. (2012) ‘What’s in a concept? Global public goods, international law, and legitimacy’, European Journal of International Law, 23(3):651–68.
    Boonen, C., Brando, N., Cogolati, S., Hagen, R., Vanstappen, N., and Wouters, J. (2018) ‘Governing as commons or as global public goods: An analysis of normative discourses’, Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies, Institute for International Law, Working Paper 203, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3271711
    Boswell, C. (2009) The Political Uses of Expert Knowledge: Immigration Policy and Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Broome, A., and Seabrooke, L. (2015) ‘Shaping policy curves: Cognitive authority in transnational capacity building’, Public Administration 93(4):956–72.
    Brown, J., and Bloomberg, M. (2018) ‘Even without the Trump administration, the US is upholding the Paris Agreement’, Climate Home News, www.climatechangenews.com/2018/09/12/even-without-trump-administration-us-upholding-paris-agreement/
    Budd, L., Bell, M., and Brown, T. (2009) ‘Of plagues, planes and politics: Controlling the global spread of infectious diseases by air’, Political Geography 28(7):426–35.
    Burchardt, M., Patterson, A. S., and Rasmussen, L. M. (2013) ‘The politics and anti-politics of social movements: Religion and HIV/AIDS in Africa’, Canadian Journal of African Studies 47(2):171–85.
    Büthe, T., and Mattli, W. (2013) The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Cafaggi, F. (2019) ‘Compliance in transnational regulation’, in Stone, D., and Moloney, K. (Eds) The Oxford Handbook of Global Policy and Transnational Administration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Carbonnier, G. (Ed) (2012) International Development Policy: Aid, Emerging Economies and Global Policies. Berlin: Springer.
    Castells, M. (2011) The Rise of the Network Society. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
    Cerny, P. G. (2017) ‘The limits of global governance: Transnational neopluralism in a complex world’, in Partnerships in International Policy-Making. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    CGIAR (2019) CGIAR Research Programs, www.cgiar.org/our-strategy/cgiar-research-programs/
    Clifton, J., and Díaz‐Fuentes, D. (2011) ‘From ‘club of the rich’ to ‘globalisation à la carte’? Evaluating reform at the OECD’, Global Policy, 2(3):300–11.
    Constantinou, C. M., Cornago, N., and McConnell, F. (2016) ‘Transprofessional diplomacy’, Brill Research Perspectives in Diplomacy and Foreign Policy, 1(4):1–66.
    Cooper, T. L., and Yoder, D. E. (1999) ‘The meaning and significance of citizenship in a transnational world: Implications for public administration’, Administrative Theory & Praxis, 21(2):195–204.
    Corry, O. (2010) ‘What is a (global) polity?’ Review of International Studies, 36(S1):157–80.
    Court, J., and Young, J. (2006) ‘Bridging research and policy in international development: An analytical and practical framework’, Development in Practice, 16(1):85–90.
    Craft, J., and Halligan, J. (2017) ‘Assessing 30 years of Westminster policy advisory system experience’, Policy Sciences, 50(1):47–62.
    Crump, L., and Downie, C. (2018) ‘The G20 chair and the case of the Global Economic Steering Committee’, Global Society, 32(1):23–46.
    Cull, N. J. (2008) ‘Public diplomacy: Taxonomies and histories’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1):31–54.
    DAC Network on Evaluation (2014) ‘Evaluation in global and regional multi-donor trust funds and partnership programs: How to proceed’, Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic cooperation and Development, 16th Meeting, 12–13 February.
    Davis, L. S., and Patman, R. G. (Eds) (2015) Science Diplomacy: New Day or False Dawn. New York: World Scientific.
    Dawes, S. S., and Gharawi, M. A. (2018) ‘Transnational public sector knowledge networks: A comparative study of contextual distances’, Government Information Quarterly, 35(2):184–94.
    Dawes, S. S., Gharawi, M. A., and Burke, G. B. (2012) ‘Transnational public sector knowledge networks: knowledge and information sharing in a multi-dimensional context’, Government Information Quarterly, 29:S112–20.
    Deacon, B. (2007) Global Social Policy and Governance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    De Búrca, G., Keohane, R. O., and Sabel, C. (2014) ‘Global experimentalist governance’, British Journal of Political Science, 44(3):477–86.
    De Oliveira, O. P. (2017) International Policy Diffusion and Participatory Budgeting: Ambassadors of Participation, International Institutions and Transnational Networks. New York: Springer.
    Department of Environment and Natural Resources (2019) ASEAN Regional Knowledge Network on Forest Law Enforcement and Governance (ARKN-FLEG), DENR, Government of Philippines, http://intl.denr.gov.ph/index.php/asean-menu/asean-groups/asean-networks/article/2
    Der Derian, J. (1987) On Diplomacy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    Drache, D. (2001) ‘The return of the public domain after the triumph of markets: Revisiting the most basic of fundamentals’, in Drache, D. (Ed) The Market or the Public Domain. London: Routledge.
    Dryzek, J. S. (2006). Deliberative Global Politics: Discourse and Democracy in a Divided World. Cambridge: Polity.
    Dunleavy, P. (2014) Democracy, Bureaucracy and Public Choice: Economic Approaches in Political Science. New York: Routledge.
    Dye, T. (1984) Understanding Public Policy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Eaton, S., and Porter, T. (2008) ‘Globalization, autonomy and global institutions: accounting for accounting’, in Pauly, L. W., and Coleman, W. D. (Eds) Global Ordering: Institutions and Autonomy in a Changing World. Vancouver: UBC Press.
    Eisenhower, D. (1960) Public Papers of the Presidents, Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1960, 1035–40, https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/eisenhower001.asp
    EL-CSID (2018) Steering Committee Meeting, 12 November.
    EL-CSID (2019) Final Report: European Leadership in Cultural, Science and Innovation Policy, Brussels, February, www.el-csid.eu/
    Elliott, L. (2012) ‘ASEAN and environmental governance: Strategies of regionalism in Southeast Asia’, Global Environmental Politics, 12(3):38–57.
    Eriksen, S. S., and Sending, O. J. (2013) ‘There is no global public: The idea of the public and the legitimation of governance’, International Theory, 5(2):213–37.
    European Commission (2014) ‘Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social committee and the Committee of the Regions: Report on the implementation of the strategy for international cooperation in research and innovation’, COM(2014) 567 final, Brussells, 11 September.
    European Environment Agency (201) Global Governance: The Rise of Non-state Actors. EEA Technical Report 4. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
    Evans, M. (2019) ‘International policy transfer’, in Stone, D., and Moloney, K. (Eds) The Oxford Handbook of Global Policy and Transnational Administration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Evans, J. W., and Davies, R. (Eds) (2014) Too Global to Fail: The World Bank at the Intersection of National and Global Public Policy in 2025. Washington, DC: World Bank.
    Fähnrich, B. (2017) ‘Science diplomacy: Investigating the perspective of scholars on politics–science collaboration in international affairs’, Public Understanding of Science, 26(6):688–703.
    Faist, T. (2012) ‘Toward a transnational methodology’, Revue européenne des migrations internationales, 28(1):51–70.
    Falkner, R. (Ed) (2016) The Handbook of Global Climate and Environment Policy. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
    Fanoulis, E., and Musliu, V. (2018) ‘Sovereignty a-venir: towards a normative understanding of sovereignty’, Global Society, 32(1):70–87.
    Farazmand, A., and Pinkowski, J. (Eds) (2007) Handbook of Globalization, Governance, and Public Administration. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis.
    Flink, T., and Schreiterer, U. (2010) ‘’Science diplomacy at the intersection of S&T policies and foreign affairs: Towards a typology of national approaches’, Science and Public Policy, 37(9):665–6.
    Fraser, N. (2013) Fortunes of Feminism: From State Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis. Brooklyn, NY: Verso.
    GAVI (2019) ‘GAVI’s mission’, www.gavi.org/about/mission/
    Gergen, K. J. (2014) ‘From mirroring to world-making: Research as future forming’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 45(3):287–310.
    Geuijen, K., Moore, M., Cederquist, A., Ronning, R., and van Twist, M. (2017) ‘Creating public value in global wicked problems’, Public Management Review, 19(5):621–39.
    Gilmore, E. A., Risi, L. H., Tennant, E., and Buhaug, H. (2018) ‘Bridging research and policy on climate change and conflict’, Current Climate Change Reports, 4(4):313–19.
    Global Policy Forum (2014) Beyond the ‘Partnerships’ Approach: Corporate Accountability Post-2015. GPF Briefing 2. New York: Global Policy Forum.
    Gluckman, P. (2016) ‘Science advice to governments: An emerging dimension of science diplomacy’, Science and Diplomacy, 5(2), www.sciencediplomacy.org/article/2016/science-advice-governments
    Gluckman, P. D. (2018) ‘How to fill the science shaped hole in global policymaking’, INGSA Blog, www.ingsa.org/ingsa-news/article-how-to-fill-the-science-shaped-hole-in-global-policymaking-peter-gluckman/
    Gluckman, P. D., Turekian, V., Grimes, R. W., and Kishi, T. (2017) ‘Science diplomacy: A pragmatic perspective from the inside’, Science and Diplomacy, 6(4).
    Green, A. (Ed) (2016) Handbook of Global Education Policy. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
    Gross Stein, J., Stren, R., Fitzgibbon, J., and MacLean, M. (2001) Networks of Knowledge: Collaborative Innovation in International Learning. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
    H2020 (2019) Future and Emerging Technologies, Horizon 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/future-and-emerging-technologies Accessed October 4th 2019.
    Haas, P. M. (2015) Epistemic Communities, Constructivism, and International Environmental Politics. New York: Routledge.
    Hadjiisky, M., Pal, L. A., and Walker, C. (Eds) (2017) Public Policy Transfer: Micro-dynamics and Macro-effects. London: Edward Elgar.
    Harrow, J., and Jung, T. (2019) ‘Providing foundations: Philanthropy, global policy and administration’, in Stone, D., and Moloney, K. (Eds) The Oxford Handbook of Global Policy and Transnational Administration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Haufler, V. (2013) A Public Role for the Private Sector: Industry Self-Regulation in a Global Economy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
    Head, B. W. (2013) ‘Evidence‐based policymaking – speaking truth to power?’ Australian Journal of Public Administration, 72(4):397–403.
    Heasman, M., and Lang, T. (2015) Food Wars: The Global Battle for Mouths, Minds and Markets. New York: Routledge.
    Heemskerk, E. M., Fennema, M., and Carroll, W. K. (2016) ‘The global corporate elite after the financial crisis: Evidence from the transnational network of interlocking directorates’, Global Networks, 16(1):68–88.
    Held, D., Dunleavy, P., and Nag, E. (2010) ‘Editorial statement’, Global Policy, 1(1), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-5899.2009.00017.x
    Held, D., and Koenig-Archibugi, M. (2004) ‘Introduction: special issue on global governance and public accountability’, Government and Opposition, 39(2):125–31.
    Hocking, B., and Melissen, J. (2016) ‘Diplomacy and digital disruption’, in Hofmeister, W., and Melissen, J. (Eds) Rethinking International Institutions: Diplomacy and Impact on Emerging World Order. Singapore: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung and Netherlands Institute of International Relations.
    Hodge, G., and Greve, C. (2018) ‘Contemporary public–private partnership: Towards a global research agenda’, Financial Accountability and Management, 34(1):3–16.
    Hoffmann, A. M. (2019) Regional Governance and Policy-Making in South America. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Holford, M., and Nichols, R. W. (2017) ‘The challenge of building science diplomacy capabilities for early career academic investigators’, Science and Diplomacy, 6(4).
    Holst, C. (2012) ‘Epistocracy: conceptual clarifications’, mimeo, University of Oslo.
    Höne, K. E., and Kurbalija, J. (2018) ‘Accelerating basic science in an intergovernmental framework: Learning from CERN’s science diplomacy’, Global Policy, 9:67–72.
    Horizon, 2020 (2019) ‘Future and emerging technologies’, https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/node/94
    Hormats, R. D. (2012) ‘Science diplomacy and twenty-first century statecraft’, Science and Diplomacy, 1(1), www.sciencediplomacy.org/perspective/2012/science-diplomacy-and-twenty-first-century-statecraft
    Hornsby, D. J., and Parshotam, A. (2018) ‘Science diplomacy, epistemic communities, and practice in sub‐Saharan Africa’, Global Policy, 9:29–34.
    Hout, W. (2012) ‘The anti-politics of development: Donor agencies and the political economy of governance’, Third World Quarterly, 33(3):405–22.
    Hoxtell, W. (2017) Multi Stakeholder Partnerships and the 2030 Agenda: Challenges and Options for Oversight at the United Nations. Berlin: GPPi.
    Huggins, A. (2015) ‘The desirability of depoliticization: Compliance in the international climate regime’, Transnational Environmental Law 4(1):101–24.
    Ilcan, S., and Phillips, L. (2008) ‘Governing through global networks knowledge mobilities and participatory development’, Current Sociology, 56(5):711–34.
    International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (2019) ‘Home’, www.iccat.int/en/index.asp
    Independent Evaluation Program (IEG) (2007) Sourcebook for Evaluating Global and Regional Partnership Programs Indicative Principles and Standards. Washington, DC: World Bank.
    Islam, S., and Susskind, L. (2012) Water Diplomacy: A Negotiated Approach to Managing Complex Water Networks. New York: Routledge.
    Jacobson, N. (2007) ‘Social epistemology: Theory for the “fourth wave” of knowledge transfer and exchange research’, Science Communication, 29:116–27.
    Jasanoff, S. (Ed) (2004) States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order. London: Routledge.
    Jeffrey, A. (2018) ‘Limited epistocracy and political inclusion’, Episteme, 15(4):412–32.
    Jenks, B. (2012) ‘The United Nations and global public goods’, in Carbonnier, G. (Ed) International Development Policy: Aid, Emerging Economies and Global Policies. New York: Springer.
    Jones, S. (2019) ‘This bridge feels like a tightrope: For critical scholars who engage in policy research’, American Behavioral Scientist, 63(3):404–420.
    Jordana, J. (2017) ‘Transgovernmental networks as regulatory intermediaries: Horizontal collaboration and the realities of soft power’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 670(1):245–62.
    Kaan, C., and Liese, A. (2011) ‘Public private partnerships in global food governance: Business engagement and legitimacy in the global fight against hunger and malnutrition’, Agriculture and Human Values, 28(3):385–99.
    Kaltofen, C., and Acuto, M. (2018) ‘Science diplomacy: introduction to a boundary problem’. Global Policy, 9:8–14.
    Kamruzzaman, P. (2013) ‘Civil society or “comprador class”, participation or parroting?’, Progress in Development Studies, 13(1):31–49.
    Kaul, I. (2019) ‘A global public good perspective’, in Stone, D., and Moloney, K. (Eds) The Oxford Handbook of Global Policy and Transnational Administration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Kaul, I., and Conceição, P. (Eds) (2006) The New Public Finance: Responding to Global Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Kauppinen, I. (2015) ‘Towards a theory of transnational academic capitalism’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 36(2):336–53.
    Keck, M., and Sikkink, K. (1998) Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    Keohane, R. O., and Nye, J. S. (1974) ‘Transgovernmental relations and international organizations’, World Politics, 27(1):39–62.
    Kerr, P., and Wiseman, G. (Eds) (2013) Diplomacy in a Globalizing World: Theories and Practices. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Khoo, M. S. (2019) ‘Law-Space Nexus, Global Governance and Global Administrative Law’, in Stone, D., and Moloney, K. (Eds) The Oxford Handbook of Global Policy and Transnational Administration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Kingah, S., Schmidt, V. A., and Yong, W. (2015) ‘Setting the scene: The European Union’s engagement with transnational policy networks’, Contemporary Politics, 21:231–44.
    Kingsbury, B., Krisch, N., and Stewart, R. B. (2005) ‘The emergence of global administrative law’, Law and Contemporary Problems 68(3–4):15–61.
    Klassen, T. R., Cepiku, D., and Lah, T. J. (Eds) (2016) The Routledge Handbook of Global Public Policy and Administration. New York: Taylor and Francis.
    Kleinschmidt, J., and Strandsbjerg, J. (2010) ‘After critical geopolitics: why international relation theory needs even more social theory’, paper presented at the Millennium Conference, October.
    Klocksiem, J. (2019) ‘Epistocracy is a wolf in wolf’s clothing’, Journal of Ethics, 23(1):19–36.
    Knill, C., and Bauer, M. W. (Eds) (2018) Governance by International Public Administrations: Bureaucratic Influence and Global Public Policies. New York: Routledge.
    Kouw, M., and Petersen, A. (2018) ‘Diplomacy in action: Latourian politics and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’, Science and Technology Studies, 31(1):52–68.
    Krasner, S. (1999) Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Kuzemko, C. (2015) ‘Energy depoliticisation in the UK: Destroying political capacity’. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18(1):107–24.
    Lee, K. (2001) ‘The global dimensions of cholera’, Global Change and Human Health, 2(1):6–17.
    Legrand, T. (2015) ‘Transgovernmental policy networks in the Anglosphere’, Public Administration, 93(4):973–91.
    Legrand, T. (2019) ‘Sovereignty renewed: transgovernmental policy networks and the global-local dilemma’, in Stone, D., and Moloney, K. (Eds) The Oxford Handbook of Global Policy and Transnational Administration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Legrand, T., and Stone, D. (2018) ‘Science diplomacy and transnational governance impact’, British Politics, 13(3):392–408.
    Lindblom, C. E. (1959) ‘The science of muddling through’. Public Administration Review, 19(2):79–88.
    Littoz-Monnet, A. (Ed) (2017) The Politics of Expertise in International Organizations: How International Bureaucracies Produce and Mobilize Knowledge. New York: Routledge.
    López de San Román, A., and Schunz, S. (2018) ‘Understanding European Union science diplomacy’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(2):247–66.
    Lövbrand, E. (2007) ‘Pure science or policy involvement? Ambiguous boundary-work for Swedish carbon cycle science’, Environmental Science and Policy, 10(1):39–47, http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/admin/publication_files/resource-2487-2007.04.pdf
    Machacek, K. M. (2018) ‘Global public–private partnerships and the new constitutionalism of the refugee regime’, Global Constitutionalism, 7(2):204–35.
    Mamudu, H., Cairney, P., and Studlar, D. (2015) ‘Global public policy: Does the new venue for transnational tobacco control challenge the old way of doing things?’ Public Administration, 93(4):856–73.
    Martens, J. (2007) Multistakeholder Partnerships – Future Models of Multilateralism? Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.583.8582&rep=rep1&type=pdf
    Merriam-Webster (2019) ‘Definition of public policy’, www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/public%20policy
    Meseguer, C. (2005) ‘Policy learning, policy diffusion, and the making of a new order’. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598(1):67–82.
    Milhorance, C. (2018) New Geographies of Global Policy-Making: South-South Networks and Rural Development Strategies. New York: Routledge.
    Mitzen, J. (2005) ‘Reading Habermas in anarchy: multilateral diplomacy and global public spheres’, American Political Science Review, 99(3):401–17.
    Moloney, K., and Stone, D. (2019) ‘Beyond the state: Global policy and transnational administration’, International Review of Public Policy, 1(1):104–18.
    Moomaw, W. R., Bhandary, R. R., Kuhl, L., and Verkooijen, P. (2017) ‘Sustainable development diplomacy: Diagnostics for the negotiation and implementation of sustainable development’, Global Policy, 8(1):73–81.
    Moro-Martin, A. (2017) ‘How dare you call us science diplomats’, Nature, 543:289.
    Murphy-Gregory, H., and Kellow, A. (2016) ‘Forum shopping and global governance’, in Hofmeister, W., and Melissen, J. (Eds) Rethinking International Institutions: Diplomacy and Impact on Emerging World Order. Singapore: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung and Netherlands Institute of International Relations.
    Muth, K. T. (2019) ‘The potential and limits of administrative sovereignty’, in Stone, D., and Moloney, K. (Eds) The Oxford Handbook of Global Policy and Transnational Administration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Nagel, S. S. (1991) Global Policy Studies: International Interaction toward Improving Public Policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Nedeva, M. (2013) ‘Between the global and the national: Organising European science’, Research Policy, 42(1):220–30.
    Newman, E., and Ravndal, E. (2019) ‘The International Civil Service’, in Stone, D., and Moloney, K. (Eds) Oxford Handbook of Global Policy and Transnational Administration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Nishimuzu, M. (2000) ‘TB control – why it makes development sense’, www.stoptb.org/events/meetings/amsterdam_conference/nishimizuspeech.asp
    Nye, J. Jr. (2005) Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.
    OECD (2019) ‘Trans-governmental networks’, www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/irc7.htm
    Okner, T. (2015) ‘The role of research institutions in civic science and sustainable development diplomacy’, CGSpace: A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs, https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/65200
    Operations Evaluation Department (OED) (2002) The World Bank’s Approach to Global Programs: An Independent Evaluation Phase 1 Report. Washington, DC: World Bank.
    Orenstein, M. A. (2005) ‘The new pension reform as global policy’, Global Social Policy, 5(2):175–202.
    Ougaard, M. (2018) ‘The transnational state and the infrastructure push’, New Political Economy, 23(1):128–44.
    Ougaard, M., and Higgott, R. (2002) Towards a Global Polity. New York: Routledge.
    Paár-Jákli, G. (2014) Networked Governance and Transatlantic Relations: Building Bridges Through Science Diplomacy. New York: Routledge.
    Pal, L. (2019) ‘Standard setting and international peer review: The OECD as a transnational policy actor’, in Stone, D., and Moloney, K. (Eds) The Oxford Handbook of Global Policy and Transnational Administration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Pamment, J. (2013) New Public Diplomacy in the 21st Century: A Comparative Study of Policy and Practice. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
    Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (2018) ‘Science diplomacy’, POSTNOTE, no. 568, February.
    Patriota, G., Castellano, A., and Wright, M. (2013) ‘Coordinating knowledge transfer: global managers as higher-level intermediaries’, Journal of World Business, 48(4):515–26.
    Pattberg, P., and Widerberg, O. (2016) ‘Transnational multistakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Conditions for success’, Ambio, 45(1):42–51.
    Peck, J., and Theodore, N. (2015) Fast Policy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    Peters, B. G., Capano, G., Howlett, M., Mukherjee, I., Chou, M. H., and Ravinet, P. (2018) Designing for Policy Effectiveness: Defining and Understanding a Concept. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Pouliot, V., and Thérien, J. P. (2018) ‘Global governance in practice’, Global Policy, 9(2):163–72.
    Prince, R. (2010) ‘Globalizing the creative industries concept: Travelling policy and transnational policy communities’, Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 40(2):119–39.
    Reinicke, W. (1998) Global Public Policy: Governing without Government, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
    Reinicke, W. H., and Deng, F., with Witte, J. M., Benner, T., and Whitaker, B. (2000) Critical Choices: The United Nations, Networks, and the Future of Global Governance. Ottawa, ON: IDRC.
    Reiss, J. (2019) ‘Expertise, agreement, and the nature of social scientific facts; or, Against epistocracy’, Social Epistemology, 33(2):183–92.
    Ronit, K. (Ed) (2007) Global Public Policy: Business and the Countervailing Powers of Civil Society. New York: Routledge.
    Ronit, K. (2018) Global Business Associations. New York: Routledge.
    Royal Society (2010) New Frontiers in Science Diplomacy: Navigating the Changing Balance of Power. London: Royal Society.
    Ruffini, P. B. (2018) ‘The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the science‐diplomacy nexus’, Global Policy, 9:73–7.
    Ruggie, J. G. (2004) ‘Reconstituting the global public domain – issues, actors, and practices’, European Journal of International Relations, 10(4):499–531.
    Ruggie, J. G. (2015) ‘Life in the global public domain: Response to commentaries on the UN Guiding Principles and the Proposed Treaty on Business and Human Rights’, 23 January, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2554726
    Sassen, S. (2016) Global Networks, Linked Cities. New York: Routledge.
    Schäferhoff, M., Campe, S., and Kaan, C. (2009) ‘Transnational public–private partnerships in international relations: Making sense of concepts, research frameworks, and results’, International Studies Review, 11(3):451–74.
    Schneiker, A., and Joachim, J. (2018) ‘Revisiting global governance in multistakeholder initiatives: Club governance based on ideational prealignments’, Global Society, 32(1):2–22.
    Schomaker, R. M. (2017) ‘Public-private governance regimes in the global sphere’, Public Organization Review, 17(1):121–38.
    SDG Knowledge Platform (2019) ‘Technology facilitation mechanism’, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/tfm
    Seabrooke, L., and Henriksen, L. F. (Eds) (2017) Professional Networks in Transnational Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Šehović, A. B. (2017) Coordinating Global Health Policy Responses: From HIV/AIDS to Ebola and Beyond. Berlin: Springer.
    Sending, O. J. (2016) ‘The transformation of international publicness’, in Hofmeister, W., and Melissen, J. (Eds) Rethinking International Institutions: Diplomacy and Impact on Emerging World Order. Singapore: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung and Netherlands Institute of International Relations.
    Sending, O. J. (2019) ‘Knowledge networks, scientific communities, and evidence-informed policy’, in Stone, D., and Moloney, K. (Eds) The Oxford Handbook of Global Policy and Transnational Administration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Severino, J.-M., and Ray, O. (2009) ‘The end of ODA: Death and rebirth of a global public policy’, 25 March, https://ssrn.com/abstract=1392460
    Skogstad, G. (Ed) (2011) Policy Paradigms, Transnationalism and Domestic Politics. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
    Slaughter, A.-M. (2004) A New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Slaughter, A.-M. (2017) ‘Global government networks, global information agencies, and disaggregated democracy’, in Public Governance in the Age of Globalization. New York: Routledge.
    Slaughter, S. (2015) ‘Building G20 outreach: The role of transnational policy networks in sustaining effective and legitimate summitry’, Global Summitry, 1(2):171–86.
    Smart, B. (2016) ‘Military-industrial complexities, university research and neoliberal economy’. Journal of Sociology, 52(3):455–81.
    Smith, Frank L., III (2014) ‘Advancing science diplomacy: Indonesia and the US Naval Medical Research Unit’, Social Studies of Science, 44(6):825–47.
    Solesbury, W. (2002) ‘The ascendancy of evidence’, Planning Theory and Practice, 3(1):90–96.
    Sorenson, E., and Torfing, J. (2005) ‘Network governance and post liberal democracy’, Administrative Theory and Praxis, 27(2):197–237.
    Soroos, M. (1986) Beyond Sovereignty: The Challenge of Global Sovereignty. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
    Standke, K. H. (2006) ‘Science and technology in global cooperation: The case of the United Nations and UNESCO’, Science and Public Policy, 33(9):627–46.
    Stibbe, D. T., Reid, S., and Gilbet, J. (2018) Maximising the Impact of Partnerships for the SDGs. New York: The Partnering Initiative and UN DESA.
    Stone, D. (2013) Knowledge Actors and Transnational Governance: The Private-Public Policy Nexus in the Global Agora. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Stone, D., and Ladi, S. (2015) ‘Global public policy and transnational administration’, Public Administration, 93(3):839–55.
    Stone, D., and Moloney., K. (Eds) (2019) The Oxford Handbook of Global Policy and Transnational Administration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Strandsbjerg, J. (2010) Territory, Globalization and International Relations: The Cartographic Reality of Space. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Stubbs, P. (2013) ‘Flex actors and philanthropy in (post-) conflict arenas: Soros’ Open Society Foundations in the post-Yugoslav space’. Politička misao: časopis za politologiju, 50(5):114–38.
    Sun, Y. (2017) ‘Transnational public-private partnerships as learning facilitators: Global governance of mercury’, Global Environmental Politics, 17(2):21–44.
    Susskind, L. E., and Ali, S. H. (2014) Environmental Diplomacy: Negotiating More Effective Global Agreements. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Tanczer, L. M., Brass, I., and Carr, M. (2018) ‘CSIRTs and global cybersecurity: how technical experts support science diplomacy’, Global Policy, 9:60–6.
    Thompson, H. E. (2018) ‘Science Diplomacy within Sustainable Development: A SIDS Perspective’, Global Policy, 9(S3):45–47.
    Thurner, P. W., and Binder, M. (2009) ‘European Union transgovernmental networks: The emergence of a new political space beyond the nation‐state?’, European Journal of Political Research, 48(1):80–106.
    Trondal, J. (2016) ‘Advances to the study of international public administration’, Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7):1097–108.
    True, J. (2003) ‘Mainstreaming gender in global public policy’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 5(3), 368–96.
    Tsingou, E. (2015) ‘Club governance and the making of global financial rules’, Review of International Political Economy 22(2):225–56.
    Turner, B. S. (1993) ‘Outline of a theory of human rights’, in Turner, B. S. (Ed) Citizenship and Social Theory. London: Sage.
    United Nations Foundation (2002) ‘Understanding public private partnerships’, www.globalproblems-globalsolutions-files.org/unf_website/PDF/understand_public_private_partner.pdf
    Vabulas, F. (2019) ‘The administration of informal intergovernmental organisations’, in Stone, D., and Moloney, K. (Eds) Oxford Handbook of Global Policy and Transnational Administration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Verger, A., Altinyelken, H. K., and Novelli, M. (Eds) (2012) Global Education Policy and International Development: New Agendas, Issues and Policies. London and New York: Bloomsbury.
    Vogelpohl, A. (2019) ‘Global expertise, local convincing power: Management consultants and preserving the entrepreneurial city’, Urban Studies 56(1):97–114.
    Volkmer, I. (2019) ‘The transnationalization of public spheres and global policy’, in Stone, D., and Moloney, K. (Eds) The Oxford Handbook of Global Policy and Transnational Administration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Wagner, C. S. (2009) The New Invisible College: Science for Development. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
    Weller, P., and Xu, Y.-C. (2019) ‘Heads of international organizations: Politicians, diplomats, managers’, in Stone, D., and Moloney, K. (Eds) Oxford Handbook of Global Policy and Transnational Administration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Wildavsky, A. (1987) Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Science of Policy Analysis. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
    Witze, A. (2018) ‘The quest to conquer Earth’s space junk problem’, Nature 561: 24–26.
    Wood, M. (2019) HyperActive Governance: How Governments Manage the Politics of Expertise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    World Bank (2019) ‘What are financial intermediary funds’, http://fiftrustee.worldbank.org/Pages/FIFSOverview.aspx
    Yeates, N. (Ed) (2008) Understanding Global Social Policy. London: Policy Press.
    Yeates, N. (Ed) (2014) Understanding Global Social Policy. London: Policy Press.
    Yu, Y., Chan, A. P., Chen, C., and Darko, A. (2017) ‘Critical risk factors of transnational public–private partnership projects: Literature review’, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 24(1).
    Zapp, M. (2018) ‘The scientization of the world polity: International organizations and the production of scientific knowledge, 1950–2015’, International Sociology, 33(1):3–26.

    Metrics

    Altmetric attention score

    Full text views

    Total number of HTML views: 0
    Total number of PDF views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    Book summary page views

    Total views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    * Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

    Usage data cannot currently be displayed.

    Accessibility standard: Unknown

    Why this information is here

    This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

    Accessibility Information

    Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.