Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Mental Capacity in Relationship
  • Cited by 19
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
July 2017
Print publication year:
2017
Online ISBN:
9781316683088
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316683088
Subjects:
Law: General Interest, Medicine: General Interest, Medico-Legal, Bioethics and Health Law, Law, Ethics, Philosophy
Series:
Cambridge Bioethics and Law (34)
Information

Book description

Recent legal developments challenge how valid the concept of mental capacity is in determining whether individuals with impairments can make decisions about their care and treatment. Kong defends a concept of mental capacity but argues that such assessments must consider how relationships and dialogue can enable or disable the decision-making abilities of these individuals. This is thoroughly investigated using an interdisciplinary approach that combines philosophy and legal analysis of the law in England and Wales, the European Court of Human Rights, and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. By exploring key concepts underlying mental capacity, the investigation concludes that both primary relationships and capacity assessments themselves must display key competencies to ensure that autonomy skills are promoted and encouraged. This ultimately provides scope for justifiable interventions into disabling relationships and articulates the dialogical practices that help better situate, interpret, and understand the choices and actions of individuals with impairments.

Reviews

'In summary, this is an ambitious and timely book which provides an important theoretical contribution to the ongoing debates on the MCA 2005 [Mental Capacity Act] and the implications of the CRPD [Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities]. It will appeal to lawyers, philosophers, ethicists, and practitioners given its engagement and reflection on both theory and practice.'

Beverly Clough Source: Medical Law Review

'Kong is amongst a small number who combine masterful deftness with both deeply rigorous philosophical analysis and practically engaged, applicable ideas. Her insights speak clearly to multiple disciplines, critiquing and re-explaining the law, and generating considered, justified practical recommendations on the interpretation and development of law … In short, her book is truly revolutionary, but also manifestly realistic. Her critical and practical suggestions warrant sustained engagement in academic policy debates, and the book is to be recommended to any reader with an interest in mental capacity and law.'

John Coggon Source: Journal of Law and Society

'Camillia Kong’s book, Mental Capacity in Relationship, is an important contribution to debates overmental capacity. It combines philosophical, psychological and legal materials in an effective and stimulating discussion of the topic. It is particularly timely given the debates over the nature of the capacity in light of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. It is an excellent, sophisticated, analysis of the issues.'

Jonathan Herring Source: Legal Studies

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

Contents

Contents
References

Bibliography

Anderson, Joel and Honneth, Axel. ‘Autonomy, Vulnerability, Recognition, and Justice’. In John Christman and Joel Anderson. Eds. Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism. Pp. 127–49.
Agich, George J. Autonomy and Long-Term Care. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
Appelbaum, Paul S. ‘Assessment of Patients’ Capacities to Consent to Treatment’. The New England Journal of Medicine 357:18 (2007): 1834–1840.
Appelbaum, Paul S. and Grisso, Thomas. ‘The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study. I; Mental Illness and Competence to Consent to Treatment’. Law and Human Behavior 19:2 (1995): 105–26.
Appelbaum, Paul S. and Grisso, Thomas. ‘The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study. II; Measures of Abilities Related to Competence to Consent to Treatment’. Law and Human Behavior 19:2 (1995): 127–48.
Atkins, Kim. ‘Autonomy and Autonomy Competencies: A Practical and Relational Approach’. Nursing Philosophy 7 (2006): 205–15.
Bach, Michael and Kerzner, Lana. A New Paradigm for Protecting Autonomy and the Right to Legal Capacity. Ontario: Law Commission of Ontario, 2010.
Baron, Marcia and Fahmy, Melissa Seymour. ‘Beneficence and Other Duties of Love in The Metaphysics of Morals’. In Hill, Thomas E., Jr. Ed. The Blackwell Guide to Kant's Ethics. Pp. 211–28.
Bartlett, Peter. Blackstone's Guide to the Mental Capacity Act 2005. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Bartlett, Peter and Sandland, Ralph. Mental Heath Law: Policy and Practice. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Beauchamp, Tom L. Standing on Principles: Collected Essays. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Beauchamp, Tom L. and Childress, James F.. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Benaroyo, Lazare and Widdershoven, Guy. ‘Competence in Mental Health Care: A Hermeneutic Approach’. Health Care Analysis 12:4 (2004): 295–306.
Benson, Paul. ‘Freedom and Value’. Journal of Philosophy 84 (1987): 465–86.
Benson, Paul. ‘Autonomy and Oppressive Socialization’. Social Theory and Practice 17 (1991): 385–408.
Benson, Paul. ‘Free Agency and Self-Worth’. Journal of Philosophy 91 (1994): 650–68.
Benson, Paul. ‘Feeling Crazy; Self-Worth and the Social Character of Responsibility’. In Catriona, Mackenzie and Stoljar, Natalie. Eds. Relational Autonomy; Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self. Pp. 72–93.
Benson, Paul. ‘Feminist Intuitions and the Normative Substance of Autonomy’. In Taylor, J. S.. Ed. Personal Autonomy: New Essays on Personal Autonomy and its Role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy. Pp. 133–7.
Bermúdez, José L. ‘Normativity and Rationality in Delusional Psychiatric Disorders’. Mind & Language 16:5 (2001): 457–93.
Bogden, Robert and Taylor, Steven J.. ‘Relationships with Severely Disabled People: The Social Construction of Humanness’. Social Problems 36 (1989): 135–48.
Brandom, Robert B. Making It Explicit; Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.
Brandom, Robert B. ‘Review: Knowledge and the Social Articulation of the Space of Reasons’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55:4 (1995): 895–908.
Brandom, Robert B. Articulating Reasons; An Introduction to Inferentialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.
Brandom, Robert B. ‘Reply to Charles Taylor's “Language Not Mysterious?”’ In Weiss, Bernhard and Wanderer, Jeremy, Eds. Reading Brandom on Making It Explicit. Pp. 301–4.
Brandt, Richard. A Theory of the Good and Right. Oxford: Clarendon, 1979.
Brownlee, K. and Cureton, A.. Eds. Disability and Disadvantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Buchanan, Allen E. and Brock, Dan W.. Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Buss, S. and Overton, L.. Eds. Contours of Agency: Essays on Themes from Harry Frankfurt. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 2002.
Cave, Emma. ‘Determining Capacity to Make Medical Treatment Decisions: Problems Implementing the Mental Capacity Act 2005’. Statute Law Review 36:1 (2015): 86–106.
Charland, Louis C. ‘Is Mr. Spock Mentally Competent? Competence to Consent and Emotion’. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 5:1 (1998): 67–81.
Charles, J. ‘New Guidance issued on Facilitating Participation of “‘P’” and Vulnerable Persons in Court of Protection Proceedings’. November 2016. Available at: http://www.familylaw.co.uk/system/froala_assets/documents/1245/Practice_Guidance_Vulnerable_Persons.pdf Accessed 15 November 2016.
Christman, John. ‘Autonomy and Personal History’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21 (1991): 1–24.
Christman, John. ‘Relational Autonomy, Liberal Individualism, and the Social Constitution of Selves’. Philosophical Studies 117 (2004): 143–63.
Christman, John. , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Christman, John and Anderson, Joel. Eds. Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Craigie, Jillian. ‘Competence, Practical Rationality and What a Patient Values’. Bioethics 25:6 (2011): 326–33.
Craigie, Jillian and Coram, Alicia. ‘Irrationality, Mental Capacities, and Neuroscience’. In Vincent, Nicole A.. Ed. Neuroscience and Legal Responsibility. Pp. 85–109.
Darwall, Stephen L. ‘Internalism and Agency’. Philosophical Perspectives 6, Ethics (1992): 155–74.
Darwall, Stephen. Welfare and Rational Care. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.
Darwall, Stephen L. The Second Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.
Davidson, Donald. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon, 1984.
Davidson, Donald. Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Dean, Richard. The Value of Humanity in Kant's Moral Theory. Oxford: Clarendon, 2006.
Dempsey, Michelle Madden. Prosecuting Domestic Violence; A Philosophical Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Department of Constitutional Affairs. Mental Capacity Act 2005 Code of Practice. London: TSO, 2007.
Dhanda, A. ‘Constructing a New Human Rights Lexicon: Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’. Sur – Revista Internacional de Direitos Humanos 5 (2008): 42–59.
Dodds, Susan. ‘Dependence, Care, and Vulnerability’. In Mackenzie, Catriona, Rogers, Wendy, and Dodds, Susan. Eds. Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy. Pp. 181–202.
Donchin, Anne. ‘Understanding Autonomy Relationally: Toward a Reconfiguration of Bioethical Principles’. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (2001): 365–86.
Donnelly, Mary. ‘Capacity Assessment under the Mental Capacity Act 2005: Delivering on the Functional Approach?’ Legal Studies 29:3 (2009): 464–91.
Donnelly, Mary. Healthcare Decision-Making and the Law: Autonomy, Capacity and the Limits of Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Dresser, Rebecca. ‘Dworkin on Dementia: Elegant Theory, Questionable Policy’. Hastings Center Report 25: 6 (1995): 32–8.
Dreyfus, Hubert L. Skillful Coping; Essays on the Phenomenology of Everyday Perception and Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Taylor, Charles. Retrieving Realism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015.
Dunn, Michael C. ‘When Are Adult Safeguarding Interventions Justified?’ In Wallbank, J. and Herring., J. Eds. Vulnerabilities, Care and Family Law. Pp. 234–53.
Dupré, Catherine. ‘Unlocking Human Dignity: Towards a Theory for the 21st Century’. European Human Rights Law Review 2 (2009): 190–205.
Dworkin, Gerald. ‘Autonomy and Behavior Control’. Hastings Center Report 6 (1976): 23–8.
Dworkin, Gerald. The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
Dworkin, Ronald. ‘Natural Law Revisited’. University of Florida Law Review 34:2 (1981–82): 165–88.
Dworkin, Ronald. Life's Dominion: An Argument about Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1993.
Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. London: Duckworth, 1996.
Dworkin, Ronald. Law's Empire. Oxford: Hart, 1998.
Dworkin, Ronald. ‘Rights as Trumps’. In Kavanagh, Aileen and Oberdiek, John. Eds. Arguing about the Law. Pp. 335–44.
Eldergill, Anselm. ‘Compassion and the Law: A Judicial Perspective’. Elder Law Journal [2015]: 268–78.
Ells, Carolyn. ‘Lessons about Autonomy from the Experience of Disability’. Social Theory and Practice 27 (2001): 599–615.
Equality and Human Rights Commission. Human Rights Review 2012; How Fair Is Britain? An Assessment of How Well Public Authorities Protect Human Rights. EHRC, 2012.
Erler, Alexandre and Hope, Tony. ‘Mental Disorder and the Concept of Authenticity’. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 21:3 (2014): 219–32.
Fischer, John Martin and Mark Ravizza, S.J. Responsibility and Control; A Theory of Moral Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Fletcher, G. P. ‘Human Dignity as a Constitutional Value’. University of Western Ontario Law Review 22 (1984): 171–82.
Frankfurt, Harry. ‘Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person’. Journal of Philosophy 68 (1971): 5–20.
Frankfurt, Harry. The Importance of What We Care About. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Fricker, Miranda. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Friedman, Marilyn. ‘Autonomy and the Split-Level Self’. Southern Journal of Philosophy 24 (1986): 19–35.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. 2nd ed. Trans. Winsheimer, Joel and Marshall, Donald G.. London: Continuum, 2004.
Goldberg, Sanford. ‘Comments on Miranda Fricker's Epistemic Justice’. Episteme 7 (2010): 138–50.
Gooding, Piers. ‘Supported Decision-Making: A Rights-Based Disability Concept and Its Implications for Mental Health Law’. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 20 (2014): 431–51.
Grisso, Thomas, Applebaum, Paul S., and Hill-Fotouhi, Carolyn. ‘The MacCat-T: A Clinical Tool to Assess Patients’ Capacities to Make Treatment Decisions’. Psychiatric Services 48:11 (1997): 1415–19.
Grondin, Jean. The Philosophy of Gadamer. Trans. Plant, Kathryn. Chesham: Acumen, 2003.
Gunn, M. J., et al. ‘Decision-Making Capacity’. Medical Law Review 7 (1999): 269–306.
Hale, Brenda. ‘Dignity’. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 31 (2009): 101–8.
Harman, Gilbert. Reasoning, Meaning and Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Harpur, Paul David. ‘Embracing the New Disability Rights Paradigm: The Importance of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’. Disability and Society 27:1 (2012): 1–14.
Held, Virginia. The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Herman, Barbara. The Practice of Moral Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.
Herring, Jonathan. Caring and the Law. Oxford: Hart, 2013.
Hill, Jr . Thomas, E. Autonomy and Self-Respect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
Hill, Jr . Thomas, E., Ed. The Blackwell Guide to Kant's Ethics. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009,
Honneth, Axel. The Struggle for Recognition; The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Trans. Anderson, Joel. Cambridge: Polity, 1995.
Hope, Tony, Tan, Jacinta, Stewart, Anne, and Fitzpatrick, Ray. ‘Anorexia Nervosa and the Language of Authenticity’. Hastings Center Report 41:6 (2011): 19–29.
Hope, Tony, Tan, Jacinta, Stewart, Anne, and McMillan, John. ‘Agency, Ambivalence and Authenticity: The Many Ways in Which Anorexia Nervosa Can Affect Autonomy’. International Journal of Law in Context 9:1 (2013): 20–36.
Hotopf, Matthew. ‘The Assessment of Mental Capacity’. Clinical Medicine 5:6 (2005): 580–4.
Jaworska, Agnieszka. ‘Respecting the Margins of Agency: Alzheimer's Patients and the Capacity to Value’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 28:2 (1999): 105–38.
Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. Paton, H. J.. London: Routledge, 1948.
Kant, Immanuel. The Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. Gregor, Mary Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Kavanagh, Aileen and Oberdiek, John. Eds. Arguing about the Law. Abingdon: Routledge, 2009.
Kayess, R. and French, P.. ‘Out of Darkness into Light? Introducing the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’. Human Rights Law Review 8:1 (2008): 1–34.
Killmister, Suzy. ‘Dignity – Not Such a Useless Concept’. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (2010): 160–4.
Kittay, Eva Feder. Love's Labor: Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency. New York: Routledge, 1999.
Kittay, Eva Feder. ‘At the Margins of Personhood’. Ethics 116 (2005): 100–31.
Kittay, Eva Feder and Carlson, Licia. Eds. Cognitive Disability and Its Challenge to Moral Philosophy. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.
Kong, Camillia. ‘The Normative Source of Kantian Hypothetical Imperatives’. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (2012): 661–90.
Kong, Camillia. ‘Beyond the Balancing Scales: The Importance of Prejudice and Dialogue in A Local Authority v E and Others’. Child and Family Law Quarterly 26:2 (2014): 216–36.
Kong, Camillia. ‘The Space between Second-Personal Respect and Rational Care in Theory and Mental Health Law’. Law and Philosophy 34 (2015): 433–67.
Kong, Camillia. ‘The Convention for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Article 12: Prospective Feminist Lessons against the “Will and Preferences” Paradigm’. Laws 4 (2015): 709–28.
Kupfner, Joseph. ‘The Moral Perspective of Humility’. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 84 (2003): 249–269.
Lacey, Nicola. Unspeakable Subjects; Feminist Essays in Legal and Social Theory. Oxford: Hart, 1998.
The Law Commission. Mentally Incapacitated Adults and Decision-Making: Medical Treatment and Research. Law Commission Consultation Paper No. 129, 1993.
The Law Commission. Mental Incapacity; Item 9 of the Fourth Programme of Law Reform: Mentally Incapacitated Adults. Law Commission Consultation Paper No. 231, 1995.
Levinas, Emmanuel. Entre Nous. Trans. Smith, Michael and Harshav, Barbara. London: Continuum, 2006.
Lukes, Steven. Power: A Radical View. 2nd ed. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
Mackenzie, Catriona. ‘The Importance of Relational Autonomy and Capabilities for an Ethics of Vulnerability’. In Mackenzie, Catriona, Rogers, Wendy, and Dodds, Susan. Eds. Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy. Pp. 33–59.
Mackenzie, Catriona and Stoljar, Natalie. Eds. Relational Autonomy; Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Mackenzie, Catriona, Rogers, Wendy, and Dodds, Susan. Eds. Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Marzola, Enrica, Abbate-Daga, Giovanni, Gamaglia, Carla, Amianto, Federico, and Fassino, Secondo. ‘A Qualitative Investigation into Anorexia Nervosa: The Inner Perspective’. Cogent Psychology 2:1 (2015).
McCrudden, Christopher. ‘Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights’. European Journal of International Law 19 (2008): 655–724.
McDowell, John. ‘Knowledge and the Internal’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55:4 (1995): 877–93.
McMahan, Jeff. ‘Cognitive Disability, Misfortune, and Justice’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 25 (1996): 3–35.
McMahan, Jeff. The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
McMahan, Jeff. ‘Radical Cognitive Limitation’. In Brownlee, K. and Cureton, A.. Eds. Disability and Disadvantage. Pp. 240–259.
Mencap. Death by Indifference: Following Up the Treat Me Right! Report. London: Mencap, 2007.
Mencap. Death by Indifference: 74 Deaths and Counting; A Progress Report 5 Years On. London: Mencap, 2012.
Meyers, Diana T. Self, Society, and Personal Choice. New York: Columbia University Press, 1989.
Meyers, Diana T. ‘Intersectional Identity and the Authentic Self?: Opposites Attract!’ In Mackenzie, Catriona and Stoljar, Natalie. Eds. Relational Autonomy; Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self. Pp. 151–80.
Meyers, Diana Tietjens. ‘Book Review of Oshana's Personal Autonomy in Society’. Hypatia 23 (2008): 202–6.
Meynen, Gerben. ‘Depression, Possibilities, and Competence: A Phenomenological Perspective’. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32:3 (2011): 181–91.
Meynen, Gerben and Widdershoven, Guy. ‘Competence in Health Care: An Abilities-based versus a Pathology-based Approach’. Clinical Ethics 7 (2012): 39–44.
Mill, J. S. On Liberty. London: Penguin, 1974.
Montgomery, Jonathan. ‘Health Care in Multi-Faith Society’. In Murphy, John. Ed. Ethnic Minorities, Their Families and the Law. Pp. 161–79.
Moore, Catriona. Living with Rett Syndrome [blog].
Murphy, John. Ed. Ethnic Minorities, Their Families and the Law. Oxford: Hart, 2000.
Nakazawa, Donna Jackson. Childhood Disrupted: How Your Biography Becomes Your Biology and How You Can Heal. New York: Atria, 2015.
Higashida, Naoki. The Reason I Jump. Trans. Yoshida, K. A. and Mitchell, David. London: Sceptre, 2007.
Nedelsky, Jennifer. Law's Relations: A Relational Theory of Self, Autonomy, and Law. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Nelson, Hilde Lindemann. Damaged Identities; Narrative Repair. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2001.
Nussbaum, Martha C. Upheavals of Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Nussbaum, Martha C. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 2007.
O'Neill, Onora. ‘Between Consenting Adults’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 14 (1985): 252–77.
O'Neill, Onora. Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant's Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
O'Neill, Onora. Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Oshana, Marina. ‘Personal Autonomy and Society’. Journal of Social Philosophy 29 (1998): 81–102.
Oshana, Marina. ‘The Autonomy Bogeyman’. Journal of Value Inquiry 35 (2001): 209–26.
Oshana, Marina. ‘The Misguided Marriage of Responsibility and Autonomy’. Journal of Ethics 6 (2002): 261–80.
Oshana, Marina. ‘How Much Should We Value Autonomy?’ Social Philosophy and Policy 20 (2003): 99–126.
Oshana, Marina. Personal Autonomy in Society. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006.
Press Association. ‘More Parents in England Prosecuted for Taking Children out of School’. The Guardian. 12 August 2015.
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Revised ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Rosen, Michael. Dignity: Its History and Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.
Sachs, David. ‘How to Distinguish Self-Respect from Self-Esteem’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 10:4 (1981): 346--60.
Scanlon, T. M. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.
Scanlon, T. M. Moral Dimensions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.
Schoeman, Ferdinand David. Ed. Responsibility, Character, and the Emotions: New Essays in Moral Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
Sensen, Oliver. ‘Kant's Conception of Human Dignity’. Kant-Studien 100 (2009): 309–31.
Shakespeare, Tom. Disability Right and Wrongs. London: Routledge, 2006.
Siebrasse, Norman. ‘Malette v. Shulman: The Requirement of Consent in Medical Emergencies’. McGill Law Journal 34 (1989): 1080–98.
Singer, Peter. ‘Speciesism and Moral Status’. In Kittay, Eva Feder and Carlson, Licia. Eds. Cognitive Disability and Its Challenge to Moral Philosophy. Pp. 331–44.
Sneiderman, Barney ‘The Shulman Case and the Right to Refuse Treatment’, Humane Medicine 7:1 (1991): 15–21.
Snow, Nancy. ‘Humility’. Journal of Value Inquiry 29 (1995): 203–16.
Stavert, Jill. ‘UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Possible Implications for Scotland for Persons with Mental Disorders’. Scottish Human Rights Journal 47 (2009).
Stump, Eleonore. ‘Control and Causal Determinism’. In Buss, S. and Overton, L.. Eds. Contours of Agency: Essays on Themes From Harry Frankfurt. Pp. 33–60.
Tan, Jacinta O. A., Hope, Tony, Stewart, Anne, and Fitzpatrick, Raymond. ‘Competence to Make Treatment Decisions in Anorexia Nervosa: Thinking Processes and Values’. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 13:4 (2006): 267–82.
Tan, Jacinta, Hope, Tony, and Stewart, Anne. ‘Competence to Refuse Treatment in Anorexia Nervosa’. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 26 (2003): 697–707.
Taylor, Charles. Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
Taylor, Charles. Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.
Taylor, Charles. Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.
Taylor, Charles. Dilemmas and Connections. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.
Taylor, J. S. Ed. Personal Autonomy: New Essays on Personal Autonomy and Its Role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Thalberg, Irving. ‘Hierarchical Analyses of Unfree Action’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 8 (1978): 211–26.
Thomas, Carol. ‘Rescuing a Social Relational Understanding of Disability’. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 6 (2004): 22–36.
Todes, Samuel. Body and World. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 2001.
United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. General Comment No. 1 – Article 12: Equal Recognition Before the Law UN Doc. No. CRPD/C/GC/1, adopted at the 11th Session. April 2014.
van de Ven, Leontine, Post, Marcel, de Witte, Luc, and van den Heuvel, Wim. ‘It Takes Two to Tango: The Integration of People with Disabilities into Society’. Disability & Society 20 (2005): 311–29.
Velleman, J. David. ‘The Possibility of Practical Reason’. Ethics 106:4 (1996): 694–726.
Vincent, Nicole A. Ed. Neuroscience and Legal Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Wallbank, J. and Herring, J.. Eds. Vulnerabilities, Care and Family Law. London: Routledge, 2013.
Watson, Gary. ‘Free Agency’. Journal of Philosophy 72 (1975): 205–20.
Weiss, Bernhard and Wanderer, Jeremy. Eds. Reading Brandom on Making It Explicit. Abingdon: Routledge, 2010.
Westlund, Andrea C. ‘Rethinking Relational Autonomy’. Hypatia 24 (2009): 26–49.
Williams, Bernard. Moral Luck; Philosophical Papers 1973–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
Wolf, Susan. ‘Sanity and the Metaphysics of Responsibility’. In Schoeman, Ferdinand David. Ed. Responsibility, Character, and the Emotions: New Essays in Moral Psychology. Pp. 46–62.
Wolf, Susan. Freedom within Reason. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.