References
Andersen, H. (2017). ‘Patterns, Information and Causation’, Journal of Philosophy 114(11): 592–622.
Anderson, S., Yamagishi, N., and Karavia, V. (2002). ‘Attentional Processes Link Perception and Action’, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 269: 1225–1232.
Andow, J. (2016). ‘Reliable but Not Home Free? What Framing Effects Mean for Moral Intuitions’, Philosophical Psychology 6: 1–8.
Andrade, V. and Pereira, J. (1997). ‘Gravitational Lorentz Force and the Description of the Gravitational Interaction’, Physical Review D 56(8): 4689.
Armstrong, D. (1983). What Is a Law of Nature? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bealer, G. (1987). ‘The Philosophical Limits of Scientific Essentialism’, Philosophical Perspectives 1: 289–365.
Bealer, G. (2002). ‘Modal Epistemology and the Rationalist Renaissance’, in Gendler, T. and Hawthorne, J. (eds.) Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 71–126.
Beebe, J. R. and Undercoffer, R. (2016). ‘Individual and Cross-Cultural Differences in Semantic Intuitions: New Experimental Findings’, Journal of Cognition and Culture 16(3–4): 322–357.
Bernhard, E., Recker, J., & Burton-Jones, A. (2013). ‘Understanding the actualization of affordances: a study in the process modeling context’, in M. Chau & R. Baskerville (eds.) Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2013). Association for Information Systems (AIS), pp. 1–11.
Biggs, S. (2011). ‘Abduction and Modality’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83(2): 283–326.
Bird, A. (2001). ‘Necessarily, Salt Dissolves in Water’, Analysis 61(4): 267–274.
Bird, A. (2007). Nature’s Metaphysics: Laws and Properties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bird, A. (2022). Knowing Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blackburn, S. (1993). ‘Morals and Modals’, in Essays in Quasi-Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 52–74.
Boardman, S. and Schoonen, T. (2023). ‘Epistemologists of Modality Wanted’, Synthese 202(6): 1–20.
Bryant, A. (2020a). ‘Keep the Chickens Cooped: The Epistemic Inadequacy of Free Range Metaphysics’, Synthese 197: 1867–1887.
Bryant, A. (2020b). ‘Naturalisms’, Think 19(56): 35–50.
Bryant, A. (2021). ‘Epistemic Infrastructure for a Scientific Metaphysics’, Grazer Philosophische Studien 98(1): 27–49.
Bryant, A. (2022). ‘The Supposed Spectre of Scientism’, in Mizrahi, M. (ed.) For and against Scientism: Science, Methodology, and the Future of Philosophy. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 47–74.
Bueno, O. and Shalkowski, S. (2014). ‘Modalism and Theoretical Virtues: Toward an Epistemology of Modality’, Philosophical Studies 172(3): 671–689.
Buller, D. (2012). ‘Four Fallacies of Pop Evolutionary Psychology’, Scientific American Special Editions 22(1S): 44–51.
Burge, T. (1993). Content Preservation, Philosophical Review 102 (4): 457–488.
Burge, T. (2003). ‘Perceptual Entitlement’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67(3): 503–548.
Caiani, S. Z. (2014). ‘Extending the Notion of Affordance’, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 13(2): 275–293.
Callender, C. (2011). ‘Philosophy of Science and Metaphysics’, in French, S. and Saatsi, J. (eds.) The Continuum Companion to the Philosophy of Science. New York: Continuum, pp. 33–54.
Callender, C. (2017). What Makes Time Special? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cameron, R. (2010). ‘The Grounds of Necessity’, Philosophy Compass 5(4): 348–358.
Cameron, R. (2012). ‘Why Lewis’s Analysis of Modality Succeeds in Its Reductive Ambitions’, Philosophers’ Imprint 12(8): 1–21.
Chakravartty, A. (2013). ‘On the Prospects of Naturalized Metaphysics’, in Ross, D., Ladyman, J., and Kincaid, H. (eds.) Scientific Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 27–50.
Chakravartty, A. (2017). Scientific Ontology: Integrating Naturalized Metaphysics and Voluntarist Epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Chalmers, D. (1996). The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chalmers, D. (2002). ‘Does Conceivability Entail Possibility?’, in Gendler, T. and Hawthorne, J. (eds.) Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 145–200.
Chemero, A. (2003). ‘An Outline of a Theory of Affordances’, Ecological Psychology 15(2): 181–195.
Cowling, S. (2011). ‘The Limits of Modality’, Philosophical Quarterly 61(244): 473–495.
Craighero, L., Fadiga, L., Umiltà, C. A., and Rizzolatti, G. (1996). ‘Evidence for Visuomotor Priming Effect’, NeuroReport 8(1): 347–349.
Cullen, S. (2010). ‘Survey-Driven Romanticism’, Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1(2): 275–296.
Demarest, H. (2016). ‘The Universe Had One Chance’, Philosophy of Science 83(2): 248–264.
Dennett, D. (1992). Consciousness Explained. New York: Little, Brown.
Deutsch, M. (2009). ‘Experimental Philosophy and the Theory of Reference’, Mind and Language 24: 445–466.
Devitt, M. (2006). ‘Intuitions in Linguistics’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57(3): 481–513.
Devitt, M. (2011). ‘Experimental Semantics’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82: 418–435.
Divers, J. (2009). ‘Modal Commitments’, in B. Hale, and Hoffmann, A. (eds.) Modality: Metaphysics, Logic, and Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 189–219.
Dohrn, D. (2020). ‘Counterfactuals and Non-exceptionalism about Modal Knowledge’, Erkenntnis 85(6): 1461–1483.
Dowe, P. (2000). Physical Causation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Drayson, Z. (2021). ‘Naturalism and the Metaphysics of Perception’, in Logue, H. and Richardson, L. (eds.) Purpose and Procedure in Philosophy of Perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 215–233.
Edgington, D. (2004). ‘Two Kinds of Possibility’, Aristotelian Society Supplementary 78: 1–22.
Einstein, A. (1918). ‘Letter to Max Born’, reprinted in Born, M. (ed.) Albert Einstein – Hedwig und Max Born. Briefwechsel, 1916–1955. Munich: Nymphenburger (1969), pp. 6–8.
Ellis, B. (2001). Scientific Essentialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Emery, N. (2023). Naturalism beyond the Limits of Science: How Scientific Methodology Can and Should Shape Philosophical Theorizing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Evans, S., Pearce, K., Vitak, J., and Treem, J. (2016). ‘Explicating Affordances: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Affordances in Communication Research’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 22(1): 35–52.
Fischer, B. (2015). ‘Theory Selection in Modal Epistemology’, American Philosophical Quarterly 52(4): 381–395.
Fischer, B. (2016). ‘A Theory-Based Epistemology of Modality’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46: 228–247.
Fischer, B. (2017). Modal Justification via Theories. Cham: Springer.
Fischer, B. and Leon, F. (eds.) (2017). Modal Epistemology after Rationalism. Dordrecht: Springer.
French, S. (2014). The Structure of the World: Metaphysics and Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
French, S. and McKenzie, K. (2012). ‘Thinking Outside the Toolbox: Towards a More Productive Engagement between Metaphysics and Philosophy of Physics’, European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 8(1): 42–59.
French, S. and Murphy, A. (2023). ‘The Value of Surprise in Science’, Erkenntnis 88(4): 1447–1466.
Fricke, B. and Soff, G. (1977). ‘Dirac-Fock-Slater Calculations for the Elements Z = 100, Fermium, to Z = 173’, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 19(1): 83–95.
Fromm, J., Mirbabaie, M., and Stieglitz, S. (2020). ‘A Systematic Review of Empirical Affordance Studies: Recommendations for Affordance Research in Information Systems’, ECIS 2020 Research-in-Progress Papers 42.
Galileo, (1632/2023). Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems. University of California Press.
Geirsson, H. (2005). ‘Conceivability and Defeasible Modal Justification’, Philosophical Studies 122(3): 279–304.
Gibson, J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Goswick, D. (2015). ‘Why Being Necessary Really Is Not the Same as Being Not Possibly Not’, Acta Analytica 30(3): 267–274.
Grèzes, J. and Decety, J. (2002). ‘Does Visual Perception of Object Afford Action? Evidence from a Neuroimaging Study’, Neuropsychologia 40(2): 212–222.
Grüne-Yanoff, T. and Wirling, Y. (2021). ‘The Epistemology of Modal Modelling’, Philosophy Compass, 16(10): e12775.
Guan, C. and Firestone, C. (2020). ‘Seeing What’s Possible: Disconnected Visual Parts Are Confused for Their Potential Wholes’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 149(3): 590–598.
Guan, C., Schwitzgebel, D., Hafri, A., and Firestone, C. (2020). ‘Possible Objects Count: Perceived Numerosity Is Altered by Representations of Possibility’, Journal of Vision 20(11): 847.
Haack, S. (2003). Defending Science – within Reason: Between Scientism and Cynicism. Amherst: Prometheus Books.
Haldane, J. B. (1926). ‘On Being the Right Size’, The Harper’s Monthly March, 424–427.
Hale, B. (2002). ‘Knowledge of Possibility and of Necessity’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103(1): 1–20.
Hanrahan, R. R. (2009). ‘Consciousness and Modal Empiricism’, Philosophia 37: 281–306.
Hansson, S. O. (2019). ‘Farmers’ Experiments and Scientific Methodology’, European Journal for the Philosophy of Science 9(3): 1–23.
Heras-Escribano, M. (2019). The Philosophy of Affordances. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hill, C. S. (2006). ‘Modality, Modal Epistemology, and the Metaphysics of Consciousness’, in Nichols, S. (ed.) The Architecture of the Imagination: New Essays on Pretense, Possibility, and Fiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 205–235.
Hirvonen, I., Koskinen, R., and Pättiniemi, I. (2021). ‘Modal Inferences in Science: A Tale of Two Epistemologies’, Synthese 199(5–6): 13823–13843.
Hume, D. (2000/1739). A Treatise of Human Nature (Oxford Philosophical Texts). Eds. Norton, D. and Norton, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ichikawa, J., Maitra, I., and Weatherson, B. (2012). ‘In Defense of a Kripkean Dogma’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85: 56–68.
Ismael, J. (2017). ‘An Empiricist’s Guide to Objective Modality’, in Yudall, Z. and Slater, M. (eds.) Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 109–125.
Jenkins, C. (2010). ‘Concepts, Experience and Modal Knowledge’, Philosophical Perspectives 24: 255–279.
Kant, I. (1781/1998). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Eds. Mohr, G. and Willaschek, M.. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Kaplan, J. (2002). ‘Historical Evidence and Human Adaptations’, Philosophy of Science 69(S3): S294–S304.
Kauppinen, A. (2007). ‘The Rise and Fall of Experimental Philosophy’, Philosophical Explorations 10(2): 95–118.
Knobe, J. (2019). ‘Philosophical Intuitions Are Surprisingly Robust across Demographic Differences’, Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 56(2): 29–36.
Knox, E. (2011). ‘Newton–Cartan Theory and Teleparallel Gravity: The Force of a Formulation’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 42: 264–275.
Kriegel, U. (2013). ‘The Epistemological Challenge of Revisionary Metaphysics’, Philosophers’ Imprint 13(12): 1–30.
Kripke, S. (1980). Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kroedel, T. (2012). ‘Counterfactuals and the Epistemology of Modality’, Philosophers’ Imprint 12(12): 1–14.
Kroedel, T. (2017). ‘Modal Knowledge, Evolution, and Counterfactuals’, in Fischer, B. and Leon, F. (eds.) Modal Epistemology after Rationalism. Dordrecht: Synthese Library, pp. 179–196.
Ladyman, J. (2000). ‘What’s Really Wrong with Constructive Empiricism?: van Fraassen and the Metaphysics of Modality’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51(2): 837–856.
Ladyman, J. and Ross, D. with Spurrett, D. and Collier, J. (2007). Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lam, B. (2010). ‘Are Cantonese Speakers Really Descriptivists? Revisiting Cross-Cultural Semantics’, Cognition 115(2): 320–332.
Lange, M. (2005). ‘A Counterfactual Analysis of the Concepts of Logical Truth and Necessity’, Philosophical Studies 125: 277–303.
Lange, M. (2009). Laws and Lawmakers: Science, Metaphysics and the Laws of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leeds, S. (2007). ‘Physical and Metaphysical Necessity’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88(4): 458–485.
Lewis, D. (1986). ‘Introduction’, in Philosophical Papers Vol. 2. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. ix–xvii.
Li, J., Longgen, L., Chalmers, E., and Snedeker, J. (2018). ‘What Is in a Name?: The Development of Cross-Cultural Differences in Referential Intuitions’, Cognition 171: 108–111.
Libet, B., Gleason, C., Wright, E., and Pearl, D. (1983). ‘Time of Conscious Intention to Act in Relation to Onset of Cerebral Activity (Readiness-Potential): The Unconscious Initiation of a Freely Voluntary Act’, Brain 106(3): 623–642.
Linnemann, N. (2020). ‘On Metaphysically Necessary Laws from Physics’, European Journal for Philosophy of Science 10(2): 1–13.
Loewer, B. (2020). ‘The Mentaculus Vision’, in Allori, V. (ed.) Statistical Mechanics and Scientific Explanation: Determinism, Indeterminism and Laws of Nature. Singapore: World Scientific, pp. 3–29.
Lowe, E. J. (1998). The Possibility of Metaphysics: Substance, Identity, and Time. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Machery, E., Mallon, R., Nichols, S., Stich, S. (2004). ‘Semantics, Cross-Cultural Style’, Cognition 92(3): B1–B12.
Malament, D. (1986). ‘Newtonian Gravity, Limits, and the Geometry of Space’, in Colodny, R. (ed.) From Quarks to Quasars: Philosophical Problems of Modern Physics. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 181–201.
Mallozzi, A. (2020). ‘Superexplanations for Counterfactual Knowledge’, Philosophical Studies 178: 1315–1337.
Mallozzi, A. (2021). ‘Putting Modal Metaphysics First’, Synthese 198(Suppl 8): 1937–1956.
Malmgren, A. (2006). ‘Is There a Priori Knowledge by Testimony?’, Philosophical Review 115(2): 199–241.
Mandelbaum, E. (2018). ‘Seeing and Conceptualizing: Modularity and the Shallow Contents of Perception’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 97(2): 267–283.
Martí, G. (2009). ‘Against Semantic Multi-culturalism’, Analysis 69: 42–48.
Maudlin, T. (2007). The Metaphysics within Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Maudlin, T. (2020). ‘A Modal Free Lunch’, Foundations of Physics 50(6): 522–529.
McKenzie, K. (2017). ‘Relativities of Fundamentality’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 59: 89–99.
Mele, A. (2008). Free Will and Luck. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Menzies, P. (1998). ‘Possibility and Conceivability: A Response-Dependent Account of Their Connections’, in Casati, R. (ed.) European Review of Philosophy, Volume 3: Response-Dependence. Stanford: CSLI, pp. 255–277.
Minkowski, H. (1952). ‘Space and Time’, in Lorentz, H. A., Einstein, A., Minkowski, H., and Weyl, H. (eds.) The Principle of Relativity: A Collection of Original Memoirs on the Special and General Theory of Relativity. New York: Dover, pp. 75–91.
Morganti, M. & Tahko, T. (2017). ‘Moderately Naturalistic Metaphysics’, Synthese 194(7): 2557–2580.
Mumford, S. & Tugby, M. (2013). ‘Introduction’, in Mumford and Tugby (eds.) Metaphysics and Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–28.
Nichols, S., Stich, S., and Weinberg, J. (2003). ‘Metaskepticism: Meditations in Ethnoepistemology’, in Luper, S. (ed.) The Skeptics. Burlington: Ashgate, pp. 227–247.
Nolan, D. (2017). ‘Naturalised Modal Epistemology’, in Fischer, B. and Leon, F. (eds.) Modal Epistemology after Rationalism. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 7–27.
Panksepp, J. and Panksepp, J. (2000). ‘Historical Evidence and Human Adaptations’, Evolution and Cognition 6(2): 108–131.
Paul, L. A. (2012). ‘Metaphysics as Modeling: The Handmaiden’s Tale’, Philosophical Studies 160(1): 1–29.
Peacocke, C. (1999). Being Known. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Price, H. (1996). Time’s Arrow and Archimedes’ Point: New Directions for the Physics of Time. New York: Oxford University Press.
Price, H. (2004). ‘Models and Modals’, in Gillies, D. (ed.) Laws and Models in Science. London: King’s College, pp. 49–69.
Priest, G. (1987). In Contradiction: a Study of the Transconsistent. New York: Oxford University Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1953a). ‘Reference and Modality’, in From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 139–159.
Quine, W. V. O. (1953b). ‘Three Grades of Modal Involvement’, Proceedings of the XIth International Congress of Philosophy 14: 65–81, reprinted in The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays (1976). New York: Random House, pp. 156–174.
Rayo, A. (2013). The Construction of Logical Space. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roca-Royes, S. (2007). ‘Mind-Independence and Modal Empiricism’, in Penco, C., Vignolo, M., Ottonelli, V., Amoretti, C. (eds.) 4th Latin Meeting in Analytic Philosophy, CEUR-WS Proceedings. Genoa: University of Genoa, pp. 117–135.
Roca-Royes, S. (2011). ‘Modal Knowledge and Counterfactual Knowledge’, Logique et Analyse 54: 537–552.
Roca-Royes, S. (2017). ‘Similarity and Possibility: An Epistemology of de re Possibility for Concrete Entities’, in Fischer, B. and Leon, F. (eds.) Modal Epistemology After Rationalism. Synthese Library, vol 378. Springer, Cham.
Roca-Royes, S. (2018). ‘Rethinking the Epistemology of Modality for Abstracta’, in Fred, I. and Leech, J. (eds.) Being Necessary: Themes of Ontology and Modality from the Work of Bob Hale. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 245–265.
Rowbottom, D. P. (2014). ‘Intuitions in Science: Thought Experiments as Argument Pumps’, in Booth, A. R. and Rowbottom, D. P. (eds.) Intuitions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 119–134.
Scarantino, A. (2003). ‘Affordances Explained’, Philosophy of Science 70(5): 949–961.
Schaffer, J. and Ismael, J. (2020). ‘Quantum Holism: Nonseparability as Common Ground’, Synthese 197: 4131–4160.
Schwitzgebel, E. and Cushman, F. (2012). ‘Expertise in Moral Reasoning? Order Effects on Moral Judgment in Professional Philosophers and Non-philosophers’, Mind and Language 27(2): 135–153.
Schelling, T. C. (1971). ‘Dynamic Models of Segregation’, Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1: 143–186.
Shoemaker, S. (1980). ‘Causality and Properties’, in P. van Inwagen (ed.) Time and Cause. D. Reidel. pp. 109-35.
Shtulman, A. and Harrington, K. (2016). ‘Tensions between Science and Intuition across the Lifespan’, Topics in Cognitive Science 8: 118–137.
Sidelle, A. (2010). ‘Modality and Objects’, The Philosophical Quarterly 60(238): 109–125.
Siegel, S. (2014). ‘Affordances and the Contents of Perception’, in Brogaard, B. (ed.) Does Perception Have Content? Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 39–76.
Sloman, A. (1996). ‘Actual Possibilities’, in Aiello, L. and Shapiro, S. (eds.) Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proc. 5th Int. Conf. (KR ’96). Boston: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 627–638.
Stoffregen, T. A. (2003). ‘Affordances as Properties of the Animal-Environment’, Ecological Psychology 15(2): 115–134.
Strohminger, M. (2015). ‘Perceptual Knowledge of Nonactual Possibilities’, Philosophical Perspectives 29: 363–375.
Suppes, P. (1967). ‘What Is a Scientific Theory?’, in Morgenbesser, S. (ed.) Philosophy of Science Today. New York: Basic Books, pp. 55–67.
Susskind, L. (2006). The Cosmic Landscape: String Theory and the Illusion of Cosmic Design. New York: Little, Brown.
Swain, S., Alexander, J., and Weinberg, J. (2008). ‘The Instability of Philosophical Intuitions: Running Hot and Cold on Truetemp’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76(1): 138–155.
Swoyer, C. (1982). ‘The Nature of Natural Laws’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 60 (3).
Sytsma, J., and Livengood, J. (2011). ‘A New Perspective Concerning Experiments on Semantic Intuitions’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89: 315–332.
Tahko, T. (2017). ‘Empirically-Informed Modal Rationalism’, in Fischer, B. and Leon, F. (eds.) Modal Epistemology after Rationalism. Cham: Springer, pp. 29–45.
Tahko, T. (2012). ‘Counterfactuals and Modal Epistemology’, Grazer Philosophische Studien 86 (1): 93–115.
Tallant, J. (2013). ‘Intuitions in Physics’, Synthese 190(15): 2959–2980.
Teller, P. (1986). ‘Relational Holism and Quantum Mechanics’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37(1): 71–81.
Thomasson, A. (2020). Norms and Necessity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Titelbaum, M. (2013). Quitting Certainties: A Bayesian Framework for Modeling Degrees of Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tucker, M. and Ellis, R. (1998). ‘On the Relations between Seen Objects and Components of Potential Actions’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24(3): 830–846.
Turvey, M. T., Shaw, R. E., Reed, E. S., Mace, W. M. (1981). ‘Ecological Laws of Perceiving and Acting: In Reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn’, Cognition 9(3): 237–304.
Van Fraassen, B. (1977). ‘The Only Necessity Is Verbal Necessity’, Journal of Philosophy 74(2): 71–85.
Van Fraassen, B. (1980). The Scientific Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van Inwagen, P. (1998). ‘Modal Epistemology’, Philosophical Studies 92: 67–84.
Verreault-Julien, P. (2019). ‘How Could Models Possibly Provide How-Possibly Explanations?’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science Part A 73: 22–33.
Vetter, B. (2015). Potentiality: From Dispositions to Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Weinberg, J., Nichols, S., and Stich, S. (2001). ‘Normativity and Epistemic Intuitions’, Philosophical Topics 29(1–2): 429–460.
Wheatley, T. and Haidt, J. (2005). ‘Hypnotic Disgust Makes Moral Judgments More Severe’, Psychological Science 16(10): 780–784.
Williamson, T. (2007). ‘Knowledge of Metaphysical Modality’, in The Philosophy of Philosophy. Malden: Blackwell, pp. 134–179.
Williamson, T. (2016). ‘Modal Science’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46(4–5): 453–492.
Wilson, A. (2013). ‘Schaffer on Laws of Nature’, Philosophical Studies 164(3): 654–667.
Wilson, A. (2020). The Nature of Contingency: Quantum Physics as Modal Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wilson, A. (Forthcoming). ‘Four Grades of Modal Naturalism’, to appear in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society.
Wirling, Y. (2020). ‘Non-uniformism about the Epistemology of Modality: Strong and Weak’, Analytic Philosophy 61(2): 152–173.
Wirling, Y. (2022). ‘Extending Similarity-Based Epistemology of Modality with Models’, Ergo 8: 45.
Withagen, R. and van Wermeskerken, M. (2010). ‘The Role of Affordances in the Evolutionary Process Reconsidered: A Niche Construction Perspective’, Theory & Psychology 20(4): 489–510.
Wolff, J. (2013). ‘Are Conservation Laws Metaphysically Necessary’, Philosophy of Science 80(5): 898–906.
Woodward, J. (2003). Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Woolfolk, R. (2013). ‘Experimental Philosophy: A Methodological Critique’, Metaphilosophy 44 (1–2): 79–87.
Worley, S. (2003). ‘Conceivability, Possibility and Physicalism’, Analysis 63: 15–23.
Yablo, S. (1993). ‘Is Conceivability a Guide to Possibility?’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53(1): 1–42.
Yli-Vakkuri, J. (2013). ‘Modal Skepticism and Counterfactual Knowledge’, Philosophical Studies 162(3): 605–623.
