References
3Boyle, B, McConkey, R, Garne, E, et al. Trends in the prevalence, risk and pregnancy outcome of multiple births with congenital anomaly: a registry-based study in 14 European countries 1984–2007. BJOG. 2013; 120: 707–16.
4Monden, C, Pison, G, Smits, J. Twin peaks: more twinning in humans than ever before. Hum Reprod. 2021; 36: 1666–73.
5Gill, P, Lende, MN, van Hook, JW. Twin Births. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing, 2023.
6Hall, JG. Twinning, Lancet. 2003; 362: 735–43.
7Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Ventura, SJ, et al. Births: final data for 2009. Natl Vital Rep. 2011; 60: 1–70.
10Weber, MA, Sebire, NJ. Genetics and developmental pathology of twinning. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010; 15: 313–18.
11Benirschke, K, Kim, CK. Multiple pregnancy. 2. N Engl J Med. 1973; 288: 1329–36.
13Witteveen, T, van den Akker, T, Zwart, JJ, Bloemankamp, KW, Roosmalen, JV. Severe acute maternal morbidity in multiple pregnancies: a nationwide cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 214(5): 641.e1–e10.
14Santana, SD, Cecatti, GJ, Surita, FG, et al. Twin pregnancy and severe maternal outcomes: the World Health Organization Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health. Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 127(4): 631–41.
15Nurmi, M, Rautava, P, Gissler, M, Vahlberg, T, Polo-Kantola, P. Incidence and risk factors of hyperemesis gravidarum: a national register-based study in Finland 2005–2017. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020; 99(8): 1003–13.
16Shinar, S, Shapira, U, Maslovitz, S. Redefining normal hemoglobin and anemia in singleton and twin pregnancies. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018; 142: 42–7.
17Johnson, CY, Rocheleau, CM, Howley, MM, et al. Characteristics of women with urinary tract infection in pregnancy. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021; 30: 1556–64.
18Sibai, BM, Hauth, J, Caritis, S, et al. Hypertensive disorders in twin versus singleton gestations. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 182: 938–42.
19Lynch, A, McDuffie, R, Jr, Murphy, J, Faber, K, Orleans, M. Preeclampsia in multiple gestation: the role of assisted reproductive technologies. Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 99: 445–51.
20Narang, K, Szymanski, LM. Multiple gestations and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: what do we know? Curr Hypertens Rep. 2020; 23: 1.
21Gortazar, L, Flores-Le Roux, JA, Benaiges, D, et al. Trends in prevalence of diabetes among twin pregnancies and perinatal outcomes in Catalonia between 2006 and 2015: the DIAGESTCAT study. J Clin Med. 2021; 10: 1937.
22Liu, X, Landon, MB, Chen, Y, Cheng, W. Perinatal outcomes with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy in twin pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016; 29: 2176–81.
23di Marco, G, Bevilacqua, E, Passananti, E, et al. Multiple pregnancy and the risk of postpartum hemorrhage: retrospective analysis in a tertiary level center of care. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13: 446.
24Fukami, T, Koga, H, Goto, M, et al. Incidence and risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage among transvaginal deliveries at a tertiary perinatal medical facility in Japan. PLoS One. 2019; 14: e0208873.
26Roman, A, Ramirez, A, Fox, NS. Screening for preterm birth in twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022; 4: 100531.
27Prapas, N, Kalogiannidis, I, Masoura, S, et al. Operative vaginal delivery in singleton term pregnancies: short-term maternal and neonatal outcomes. Hippokratia. 2009; 13: 41–5.
28Schachter-Safrai, N, Karavani, G, Haj-Yahya, R, Ofek Shlomai, N, Porat, S. Risk factors for cesarean delivery and adverse neonatal outcome in twin pregnancies attempting vaginal delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018; 97: 845–51.
29Hofmeyr, GJ, Barrett, JF, Crowther, CA. Planned cesarean section for women with a twin pregnancy. Cochrane. 2015; 2019: CD006553.
30Bragg, F, Cromwell, DA, Edozien, LC, et al. Variation in rates of cesarean section among English NHS trusts after accounting for maternal and clinical risk: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2010; 341: c5065.
31Bradshaw, H, Riddle, JN, Salimgaraev, R, Zhaunova, L, Payne, JL. Risk factors associated with postpartum depressive symptoms: a multinational study. J Affect Disord. 2022; 301: 345–51.
32Madar, H, Goffinet, F, Seco, A, et al. EPIMOMS (EPIdémiologie de la MOrbidité Maternelle Sévère) study group. Severe acute maternal morbidity in twin compared with singleton pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 133: 1141–50.
33Jarvis, S, Nelson-Piercy, C. Management of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy. BMJ. 2011; 342: d3606.
34Einarson, TR, Piwko, C , Koren, G. Quantifying the global rates of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: a meta analysis. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2013; 20: e171–83.
35Fiaschi, L, Nlson-Piercy, C, Tata, LJ. Hospital admission for hyperemesis gravidarum: a nationwide study of occurrence, reoccurrence and risk factors among 8.2 million pregnancies. Human Repro. 2016; 31(8): 1675–84.
36Mitsuda, N, Eitoku, M, Maeda, N, Fujieda, M, Suganuma, N. Severity of nausea and vomiting in singleton and twin pregnancies in relation to fetal sex: the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS). J Epidemiol. 2019; 29: 340–6.
37Rao, A, Sairam, S, Shehata, H. Obstetric complications of twin pregnancies. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2004; 18: 557–76.
38Francisco, C, Gamito, M, Reddy, M, Rolnik, DL. Screening for preeclampsia in twin pregnancies. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2022; 84: 55–65.
39Day, MC, Barton, JR, O’Brien, JM, Istwan, NB, Sibai, BM. The effect of fetal number on the development of hypertensive conditions of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 106(5 Pt 1): 927–31.
40Henry, DE, McElrath, TF, Smith, NA. Preterm severe preeclampsia in singleton and twin pregnancies. J Perinatol 2013; 33(2): 94–7.
41Wen, SW, Demissie, K, Yang, Q, Walker, MC. Maternal morbidity and obstetric complications in triplet pregnancies and quadruplet and higher-order multiple pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 191(1): 254–8.
42Yuan, T, Wang, W, Li, XL, et al. Clinical characteristics of fetal and neonatal outcomes in twin pregnancy with preeclampsia in a retrospective case-control study: a STROBE-compliant article. Medicine (Baltim). 2016; 95: e5199.
43Gonzalez, MC, Reyes, H, Arrese, M, et al. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy in twin pregnancies. J Hepatol. 1989; 9: 84–90.
44Feng, C, Li, WJ, He, RH, et al. Impacts of different methods of conception on the perinatal outcome of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy in twin pregnancies. Scientific Reports. 2018; 8: 3985.
46Liu, N, Hu, Q, Liao, H, Wang, X, Yu, H. Vasa previa: perinatal outcomes in singleton and multiple pregnancies. Biosci Trends. 2021; 15: 118–25.
47Hamza, A, Herr, D, Solomayer, EF, Meyberg-Solomayer, G. Polyhydramnios: causes, diagnosis and therapy. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2013; 73: 1241–6.
48Goldenberg, RL, Culhane, JF, Iams, JD, Romero, R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008; 371: 75–84.
49Chawanpaiboon, S, Vogel, JP, Moller, AB, et al. Global, regional, and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014: a systematic review and modelling analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2019; 7: e37–e46.
50Blondel, B, Macfarlane, A, Gissler, M, Breart, G, Zeitlin, J. General obstetrics: preterm birth and multiple pregnancy in European countries participating in the PERISTAT project. BJOG. 2006; 113: 528–35.
51Victoria, A, Mora, G, Arias, F. Perinatal outcome, placental pathology, and severity of discordance in monochorionic and dichorionic twins. Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 97: 310–15.
52Bateni, ZH, Clark, SL, Sangi-Haghpeykar, H, et al. Trends in the delivery route of twin pregnancies in the United States, 2006–2013. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016; 205: 120–6.
53Ross, LE, McQueen, K, Vigod, S, Dennis, CL. Risk for postpartum depression associated with assisted reproductive technologies and multiple births: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2011; 17: 96–106.
54National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Twin and Triplet Pregnancy. NICE clinical guideline. London: NICE, 2024. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng137 (accessed 22nd October 2024). 55Naert, MN, Khadraoui, H, Muniz Rodriguez, A, Fox, NS. Stratified risk of pregnancy loss for women with a viable singleton pregnancy in the first trimester. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022; 35: 4491–5.
56Batsry, L, Yinon, Y. The vanishing twin: diagnosis and implications. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2022; 84: 66–75.
57Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RCOG). Late Intrauterine Fetal Death and Stillbirth. Green-top guideline no. 55. London: RCOG, 2010.
58Mackie, FL, Rigby, A, Morris, RK, Kilby, MD. Prognosis of the co-twin following spontaneous single intrauterine fetal death in twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2019; 126: 569–78.
59Filipecka-Tyczka, D, Jakiel, G, Kajdy, A, Rabijewski, M. Is growth restriction in twin pregnancies a double challenge? – A narrative review. J Mother Child. 2021; 24: 24–30.
60Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RCOG). Umbilical Cord Prolapse. Green-top guideline no. 50. London: RCOG, 2014.
61Asahina, R, Tsuda, H, Nishiko, Y, et al. Evaluation of the risk of umbilical cord prolapse in the second twin during vaginal delivery: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2021; 11: e046616.
62Fessehaye, A, Abubeker, F, Daba, M. Locked twins – remote from term: a case report. 2021; 15: 115.
63Pharoah, PO, Cooke, T. Cerebral palsy and multiple births. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1996; 75: F174–7.
64Sellier, E, Goldsmith, S, McIntyre, S, et al. Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy Europe Group and the Australian Cerebral Palsy Register Group. Cerebral palsy in twins and higher multiple births: a Europe-Australia population-based study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2021; 63: 712–20.
65Draper, ES, Gallimore, ID, Smith, LK, et al. MBRRACE-UK Perinatal Mortality Surveillance Report, UK Perinatal Deaths for Births from January to December 2020. Leicester: The Infant Mortality and Morbidity Studies, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, 2022.
66Glinianaia, SV, Rankin, J, Wright, C. Congenital anomalies in twins: a register-based study. Hum Reprod. 2008; 23: 1306–11.
67Lewi, L, Jani, J, Blickstein, I, et al. The outcome of monochorionic diamniotic twin gestations in the era of invasive fetal therapy: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 199: 514.e1–8.
68Baxi, LV, Walsh, CA. Monoamniotic twins in contemporary practice: a single-center study of perinatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010; 23: 506–10.
69Jung, YM, Lee, SM, Oh, S, et al. The concordance rate of non-chromosomal congenital malformations in twins based on zygosity: a retrospective cohort study. BJOG. 2021; 128: 857–64.
70Sperling, L, Kiil, C, Larsen, LU, et al. Detection of chromosal abnormalities, congenital abnormalities and transfusion syndrome in twins. Ultrasoun Obs Gynecol. 2007; 29(5): 517–26.
71Piro, E, Schierz, IAM, Serra, G, et al. Growth patterns and associated risk factors of congenital malformations in twins. Ital J Pediatr. 2020; 46: 73.
72Sun, LM, Chen, XK, Wen, SW, et al. Perinatal outcomes of normal cotwins in twin pregnancies with one structurally anomalous fetus: a population-based retrospective study. Am J Perinatol. 2009; 26: 51–6.
73d’Antonio, F, Khalil, A. Screening and diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities in twin pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2022; 84: 229–39.
75Wen, SW, Miao, Q, Taljaard, M, et al. Associations of assisted reproductive technology and twin pregnancy with risk of congenital heart defects. JAMA Pediatr. 2020; 174: 446–54.
76Zamani, Z, Parekh, U. Vanishing Twin Syndrome. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing, 2022.
77Harris, AL, Sacha, CR, Basnet, KM, et al. Vanishing twins conceived through fresh in vitro fertilization: obstetric outcomes and placental pathology. Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 135: 1426–33.
78Kamath, MS, Antonisamy, B, Selliah, HY, Sunkara, SK. Perinatal outcomes of singleton live births with and without vanishing twin following transfer of multiple embryos: analysis of 113 784 singleton live births. Hum Reprod. 2018; 33: 2018–22.
79d’Antonio, F, Khalil, A, Dias, T, Thilaganathan, B. Early fetal loss in monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies: analysis of the Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) multiple pregnancy cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 41: 632–6.
80Sebire, NJ, Thornton, S, Hughes, K, Snijders, RJ, Nicolaides, KH. The prevalence and consequences of missed abortion in twin pregnancies at 10 to 14 weeks of gestation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997; 104: 847–8.
81Morris, RK, Mackie, F, Garces, AT, Knight, M, Kilby, MD. The incidence, maternal, fetal and neonatal consequences of single intrauterine fetal death in monochorionic twins: a prospective observational UKOSS study. PLoS One. 2020; 15: e0239477.
82Hillman, SC, Morris, RK, Kilby, MD. Co-twin prognosis after single fetal death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 118: 928–40.
83Morin, L, Lim, K, Bly, S, et al. Ultrasound in twin pregnancies: no. 260, June 2011. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2011; 115: 117–18.
84Breathnach, FM, Malone, FD. Fetal growth disorders in twin gestations. Semin Perinatol. 2012; 36: 175–81.
86Cerra, C, d’Antonio, F. Discordance in twins: association versus prediction. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2022; 84: 33–42.
87Kalafat, E, Thilaganathan, B, Papageorghiou, A, Bhide, A, Khalil, A. Significance of placental cord insertion site in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 52: 378–84.
88Couck, I, Mourad Tawfic, N, Deprest, J, et al. Does site of cord insertion increase risk of adverse outcome, twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome and discordant growth in monochorionic twin pregnancy? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 52: 385–9.
89Khalil, A, Beune, I, Hecher, K, et al. Consensus definition and essential reporting parameters of selective fetal growth restriction in twin pregnancy: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 53: 47–54.
90d’Antonio, F, Odibo, AO, Prefumo, F, Khalil, A, Buca, , Flacco, ME. Weight discordance and perinatal mortality in twin pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 52: 11–23.
91Breathnach, FM , McAuliffe, FM, Geary, M, et al. Definition of intertwin birth weight discordance. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 118: 94–103.
92Khalil, A, Rodgers, M, Baschat, A, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines: role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 47: 247–63.
93American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins – Obstetrics; Society for Maternal–Fetal Medicine. Practice bulletin No. 169: multifetal gestations: twin, triplet, and higher-order multifetal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 128: e131–46.
96di Mascio, D, Acharya, G, Khalil, A, et al. Birthweight discordance and neonatal morbidity in twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019; 98: 1245–57.
97Khalil, A, Prasad, S. Screening and prevention of preterm birth in twin pregnancies. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2022; 84: 179–93.
98Ananth, CV, Joseph, K, Demissie, K, Vintzileos, AM. Trends in twin preterm birth subtypes in the United States, 1989 through 2000: impact on perinatal mortality. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 193: e1–9.
99Murray, S, Stock, S, Coman, S, Cooper, E, Norman, J. Spontaneous preterm birth prevention in multiple pregnancy. Obstet Gynaecol. 2018; 20: 57–63.
100Breathnach, FM, McAuliffe, FM, Geary, M, et al. Perinatal Ireland Research Consortium. Optimum timing for planned delivery of uncomplicated monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 119: 50–9.
101Marleen, S, Dias, C, Nandasena, R, et al. Association between chorionicity and preterm birth in twin pregnancies: a systematic review involving 29 864 twin pregnancies. BJOG. 2021; 128: 788–96.
102Borah, T, Das, A. Locked twins: a rarity. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2012; 2: 204–5.
103Khalil, A, Bhide, AT, Papageorghiou, A, Thilaganathan, B. Reduction in twin stillbirth following implementation of NICE guidance. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 56: 566–71.
104Draper, ES, Gallimore, ID, Kurinczuk, JJ, Kenyon, S (eds.) on behalf of MBRRACE-UK. MBRRACE-UK 2019 Perinatal Confidential Enquiry: Stillbirths and Neonatal Deaths in Twin Pregnancies. Leicester: The Infant Mortality and Morbidity Studies, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, 2021.
105Dube, J, Dodds, L, Armson, BA. Does chorionicity or zygosity predict adverse perinatal outcomes in twins? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 186: 579–83.
106Danon, D, Sekar, R, Hack, KE, Fisk, NM. Increased stillbirth in uncomplicated monochorionic twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 121: 1318–26.
107d’Antonio, F, Odibo, A, Berghella, V, et al. Perinatal mortality, timing of delivery and prenatal management of monoamniotic twin pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 53: 166–74.
108Mutchinick, OM, Luna-Muñoz, L, Amar, E, et al. Conjoined twins: a worldwide collaborative epidemiological study of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2011; 157: 274–87.
109Glinianaia, SV, Rankin, J, Khalil, A, et al. Prevalence, antenatal management and perinatal outcome of monochorionic monoamniotic twin pregnancy: a collaborative multicenter study in England, 2000–2013. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 53: 184–92.
110Chauhan, SP, Scardo, JA, Hayes, E, et al. Twins: prevalence, problems, and preterm births. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 203: 305–15.
111Lewi, L, Valencia, C, Gonzalez, E, Deprest, J, Nicolaides, KH. The outcome of twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence diagnosed in the first trimester. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 203: 213.e1–4.
112Bamberg, C, Hecher, K. Twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: controversies in the diagnosis and management. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2022; 84: 143–54.
113Nicholas, L, Fischbein, R, Ernst-Milner, S, Wani, R. Review of international clinical guidelines related to prenatal screening during monochorionic pregnancies. J Clin Med. 2021; 10: 1128–47.
114Spitz, L. Conjoined twins. Br J Surg. 1996; 83(8): 1028–30.
115Mian, A, Gabra, NI, Sharma, T, et al. Conjoined twins: from conception to separation, a review. Clin Anat. 2017; 30: 385–96.
116Chen, CP, Hsu, CY, Su, JW, et al. Conjoined twins detected in the first trimester: a review. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 50: 424–31.
117van Mieghem, T, Abbasi, N, Shinar, S, et al. Monochorionic monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022; 4: 100520.
118Rossi, AC, Prefumo, F. Impact of cord entanglement on perinatal outcome of monoamniotic twins: a systematic review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 41: 131–5.
119Sueters, M, Oepkes, D. Diagnosis of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome, selective fetal growth restriction, twin–polycythemia sequence, and twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014; 28: 215–26.
120Badr, DA, Carlin, A, Kang, X, et al. Evaluation of the new expert consensus-based definition of selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022; 35: 2338–44.
121Gratacos, E, Lewi, L, Muñoz, B, et al. A classification system for selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic pregnancies according to umbilical artery Doppler flow in the smaller twin. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 30: 28–34.
122Gratacos, E, Antolin, E, Lewi, L, et al. Monochorionic twins with selective intrauterine growth restriction and intermittent absent or reversed end-diastolic flow (Type III): feasibility and perinatal outcome of fetoscopic placental laser coagulation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 31: 669–75.
123van Gemert, MJC, van den Wijngaard, JPHM, Vandenbussche, FPHA. Twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence is more common than generally accepted. Birth Defects Res a Clin Mol Teratol. 2015; 103(7): 641–3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdra.23405. 124Quintero, RA, Morales, WJ, Allen, MH, et al. Staging of twin–twin transfusion syndrome. J Perinatol. 1999; 19: 550–5.
125Hecher, K, Gardiner, HM, Diemert, A, Bartmann, P. Long-term outcomes for monochorionic twins after laser therapy in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2018; 2: 525–35.
126Lopriore, E, Oepkes, D, Walther, FJ. Neonatal morbidity in twin–twin transfusion syndrome. Early Hum Dev. 2011; 87: 595–9.
127Tollenaar, LSA, Slaghekke, F, Lewi, L, et al. Spontaneous twin anemia polycythemia sequence: diagnosis, management, and outcome in an international cohort of 249 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 224: e1–213.
128Assaf, SA, Benirschke, K, Chmait, RH. Spontaneous twin anemia–polycythemia sequence complicated by recipient placental vascular thrombosis and hydrops fetalis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011; 24: 549–52.
129Slaghekke, F, Kist, WJ, Oepkes, D, et al. Twin anemia–polycythemia sequence: diagnostic criteria, classification, perinatal management and outcome. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2010; 27: 181–90.
130Murray, SR, Norman, JE. Multiple pregnancies following assisted reproductive technologies – a happy consequence or double trouble? Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014; 19: 222–7.
131Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Guidance on the limits to the number of embryos to transfer: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2017; 107: 901–3.
132Bai, F, Wang, DY, Fan, YJ, et al. Assisted reproductive technology service availability, efficacy and safety in mainland China: 2016. Hum Reprod. 2020; 35: 446–52.
133Adamson, GD, Normal, RJ. Why are multiple pregnancy rates and single embryo transfer rates so different globally, and what do we do about it? Fertil Steril. 2020; 114(4): 680–9.
134Kamath, MS, Mascarenhas, M, Kirubakaran, R, Bhattacharya, S. Number of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; (8): CD003416.
135Ma, S, Peng, Y, Hu, L, et al. Comparisons of benefits and risks of single embryo transfer versus double embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2022; 20: 20.
136Luke, B, Gopal, D, Cabral, H, et al. Adverse pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes in twins: effects of maternal fertility status and infant gender combinations; the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 217: 330.e1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.025. 137Glujovsky, D, Retamar, AMQ, Sedo, CRA, et al. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022; (5): CD002118.
138Busnelli, A, Dallagiovanna, C, Reschini, M, et al. Risk factors for monozygotic twinning after in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2019; 111: 302–17.
139Ellings, JM, Newman, RB, Hulsey, TC, Bivins, HA, Keenan, A. Reduction in very low birth weight deliveries and perinatal mortality in a specialized, multidisciplinary twin clinic. Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 81: 387–91.
140Newman, RB, Ellings, JM. Antepartum management of the multiple gestation: the case for specialized care. Semin Perinatol. 1995; 19: 387–403.
141Ruk, RJ, Brown, CE, Peters, MT, Johnston, AB. Specialized care for twin gestations: improving newborn outcomes und reducing costs. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2001; 30: 52–60.
142National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Multiple Pregnancy: Twin and Triplet Pregnancies. NICE Quality Standard QS 46. London: NICE, 2013 (updated September 2019). www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs46 (accessed 15 September 2024). 144Bricker, L, Reed, K, Wood, L, Neilson, JP. Nutritional advice for improving outcomes in multiple pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; (11): CD008867.
145National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Antenatal Care. NICE Clinical Guideline NG201. London: NICE, 2021. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng201 (accessed 15 September 2024). 147Stock, S, Norman, J. Preterm and term labour in multiple pregnancies. Seminars Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010; 15(6): 336–41.
148National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Preterm Labour and Birth. NICE Guideline NG25. London: NICE, 2022. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng25 (accessed 15 September 2024). 149dos Santos, F, Daru, J, Rogozińska, E, Cooper, NAM. Accuracy of fetal fibronectin for assessing preterm birth risk in asymptomatic pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018; 97: 657–67.
150Kuhrt, K, Hezelgrave-Elliott, N, Stock, SJ, et al. Quantitative fetal fibronectin for prediction of preterm birth in asymptomatic twin pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020; 99: 1191–7.
151Carter, J, Seed, PT, Watson, HA, et al. Development and validation of predictive models for QUiPP App v.2: tool for predicting preterm birth in women with symptoms of threatened preterm labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 55: 357–67.
152Singer, E, Pilpel, S, Bsat, F, et al. Accuracy of fetal fibronectin to predict preterm birth in twin gestations with symptoms of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 109: 1083–7.
153Kindinger, L, Poon, L, Cacciatore, S, et al. The effect of gestational age and cervical length measurements in the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in twin pregnancies: an individual patient level meta-analysis. BJOG. 2016; 123: 877–84.
154American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins – Obstetrics; Society for Maternal–Fetal Medicine. Multifetal gestations: twin, triplet, and higher-order multifetal pregnancies: ACOG practice bulletin, number 231. Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 137: e145–62.
155Research Committee, SMFM ; Grantz, KL, Kawakita, T, Lu, YL, et al. SMFM special statement: state of the science on multifetal gestations: unique considerations and importance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 221: B2–12.
156 da Silva Lopes, K, Takemoto, Y, Ota, E, Tanigaki, S, Mori, R. Bed rest with and without hospitalisation in multiple pregnancy for improving perinatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; (3): CD012031.
157Dodd, JM, Grivell, RM, O’Brien, CM, Dowswell, T, Deussen, AR. Prenatal administration of progestogens for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; (11): CD012024.
158Romero, R, Conde-Agudelo, A, El-Refaie, W, et al. Vaginal progesterone decreases preterm birth and neonatal morbidity and mortality in women with a twin gestation and a short cervix: an updated meta‐analysis of individual patient data. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 49: 303–14.
159El-Refaie, W, Abdelhafez, MS, Badawy, A. Vaginal progesterone for prevention of preterm labor in asymptomatic twin pregnancies with sonographic short cervix: a randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016; 293: 61–7.
160American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins – Obstetrics. Prediction and prevention of spontaneous preterm birth: ACOG practice bulletin, number 234. Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 138: e65–90.
161Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstericians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG). Progesterone: Use in the Second and Third Trimester of Pregnancy for the Prevention of Preterm Birth. Best practice statement. Melbourne: RANZCOG, 2017.
162EPPPIC Group. Evaluating Progestogens for Preventing Preterm birth International Collaborative (EPPPIC): meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2021; 397: 1183–94.
163Rehal, A, Benkő, Z, De Paco Matallana, C, et al. Early vaginal progesterone versus placebo in twin pregnancies for the prevention of spontaneous preterm birth: a randomized, double-blind trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 224: 86.e1–19.
164Romero, R, Conde-Agudelo, A, Rehal, A, et al. Vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes in twin gestations with a short cervix: an updated individual patient data meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 59: 263–6.
165The George Washington University Biostatistics Center. A trial of pessary and progesterone for preterm prevention in twin gestation with a short cervix. clinicaltrials.gov. 2021. Report No.: NCT02518594. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02518594 (accessed 15 September 2024). 167Liem, SM, van Pampus, MG, Mol, BW, Bekedam, DJ. Cervical pessaries for the prevention of preterm birth: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013; 2013: 576723.
168Liem, S, Schuit, E, Hegeman, M, et al. Cervical pessaries for prevention of preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy (ProTWIN): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013; 382: 1341–9.
169Goya, M, de la Calle, M, Pratcorona, L, et al. Cervical pessary to prevent preterm birth in women with twin gestation and sonographic short cervix: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (PECEP-Twins). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 214: 145–52.
170Nicolaides, KH, Syngelaki, A, Poon, LC, et al. Cervical pessary placement for prevention of preterm birth in unselected twin pregnancies: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 214: 3.e1–9.
171Pratcorona, L, Goya, M, Merced, C, et al. Cervical pessary to reduce preterm birth <34 weeks of gestation after an episode of preterm labor and a short cervix: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 219: 99.e1–16.
172Thangatorai, R, Lim, FC, Nalliah, S. Cervical pessary in the prevention of preterm births in multiple pregnancies with a short cervix: PRISMA compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018; 31: 1638–45.
173Norman, JE, Norrie, J, MacLennan, G, et al. Evaluation of the Arabin cervical pessary for prevention of preterm birth in women with a twin pregnancy and short cervix (STOPPIT-2): an open-label randomised trial and updated meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2021; 18: e1003506.
174Rafael, TJ, Berghella, V, Alfirevic, Z. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in multiple pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (9): CD009166.
175Rottenstreich, A, Levin, G, Kleinstern, G, et al. History-indicated cervical cerclage in management of twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 54: 517–23.
176Li, C, Shen, J, Hua, K. Cerclage for women with twin pregnancies: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 220: 543–57.
179Roman, A, Zork, N, Haeri, S, et al. Physical examination-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 223: 902.e1–e11.
180Gyamfi, C, Lerner, V, Holzman, I, Stone, JL. Routine cervical length in twins and perinatal outcomes. Am J Perinatol. 2007; 24: 65–9.
181Palas, D, Ehlinger, V, Alberge, C, et al. Efficacy of antenatal corticosteroids in preterm twins: the EPIPAGE-2 cohort study. BJOG. 2018; 125: 1164–70.
183Kenyon, S, Brocklehurst, P, Jones, D, et al. MRC ORACLE Children Study. Long term outcomes following prescription of antibiotics to pregnant women with either spontaneous preterm labor or preterm rupture of the membranes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2008; 8: 14.
184Sela, HY, Simpson, LL. Preterm premature rupture of membranes complicating twin pregnancy: management considerations. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 54: 321–9.
185Doyle, LW, Crowther, CA, Middleton, P, Marret, S, Rouse, D. Magnesium sulphate for women at risk of preterm birth for neuroprotection of the fetus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; (1): CD004661.
188Cheung, KW, Seto, MTY, Wang, W, et al. Effect of delayed interval delivery of remaining fetus(es) in multiple pregnancies on survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 222: 306–19.
189d’Antonio, F, Khalil, A, Pagani, G, et al. Crown-rump length discordance and adverse perinatal outcome in twin pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 44: 138–46.
190Lewi, L, Lewi, P, Diemert, A, et al. The role of ultrasound examination in the first trimester and at 16 weeks’ gestation to predict fetal complications in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 199: 493.e1–7.
191Memmo, A, Dias, T, Mahsud-Dornan, S, et al. Prediction of selective fetal growth restriction and twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome in monochorionic twins. BJOG. 2012; 119: 417–21.
192Kurtz, A, Wapner, R, Mata, J, Johnson, A, Morgan, P. Twin pregnancies: accuracy of first-trimester abdominal US in predicting chorionicity and amnionicity. Radiology. 1992; 185: 759–62.
193Monteagudo, A, Timor-Tritsch, IE, Sharma, S. Early and simple determination of chorionic and amniotic type in multifetal gestations in the first fourteen weeks by high-frequency transvaginal ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 170: 824–9.
194Lu, J, Ting, YH, Leung, TY. Determining chorionicity and amnionicity in twin pregnancies: pitfalls. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2022; 84: 2–16.
195Lu, J, Cheng, YKY, Ting, YH, Law, KM, Leung, TY. Pitfalls in assessing chorioamnionicity: novel observations and literature review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 219: 242–54.
196Maruotti, GM, Saccone, G, Morlando, M, Martinelli, P. First-trimester ultrasound determination of chorionicity in twin gestations using the lambda sign: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016; 202: 66–70.
197Sepulveda, W, Sebire, NJ, Hughes, K, Kalogeropoulos, A, Nicolaides, KH. Evolution of the lambda or twin-chorionic peak sign in dichorionic twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 89: 439–41.
198Gueneuc, A, Spaggiari, E, Bonniere, M, et al. Pitfall in the diagnosis of chorionicity in twin pregnancy at first trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 49: 277–8.
199Dias, T, Arcangeli, T, Bhide, A, et al. First-trimester ultrasound determination of chorionicity in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 38: 530–2.
200Fenton, C, Reidy, K, Demyanenko, M, et al. The significance of yolk sac number in monoamniotic twins. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2019; 46: 193–9.
201Dias, T, Ladd, S, Mahsud-Dornan, S, et al. Systematic labeling of twin pregnancies on ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 38: 130–3.
202Mackie, FL, Whittle, R, Morris, RK, et al. First-trimester ultrasound measurements and maternal serum biomarkers as prognostic factors in monochorionic twins: a cohort study. Diagn Progn Res. 2019; 3: 9.
203Prats, P, Rodríguez, I, Comas, C, Puerto, B. Systematic review of screening for trisomy 21 in twin pregnancies in first trimester combining nuchal translucency and biochemical markers: a meta-analysis. Prenat Diagn. 2014; 34: 1077–83.
204Sarno, L, Revello, R, Hanson, E, Akolekar, R, Nicolaides, KH. Prospective first-trimester screening for trisomies by cell-free DNA testing of maternal blood in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 47: 705–11.
205Khalil, A, Archer, R, Hutchinson, V, et al. Noninvasive prenatal screening in twin pregnancies with cell-free DNA using the IONA test: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 225: 79.e1–13.
206Revello, R, Sarno, L, Ispas, A, Akolekar, R, Nicolaides, KH. Screening for trisomies by cell-free DNA testing of maternal blood: consequences of a failed result. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 47(6): 698–704.
207Leung, TY, Qu, JZ, Liao, GJ, et al. Noninvasive twin zygosity assessment and aneuploidy detection by maternal plasma DNA sequencing. Prenat Diagn. 2013; 33: 675–81.
208Qu, JZ, Leung, TY, Jiang, P, et al. Noninvasive prenatal determination of twin zygosity by maternal plasma DNA analysis. Clin Chem. 2013; 59: 427–35.
209Benn, P, Rebarber, A. Non-invasive prenatal testing in the management of twin pregnancies. Prenat Diagn. 2021; 41: 1233–40.
210Balaguer, N, Mateu-Brull, E, Serra, V, Simón, C, Milán, M. Should vanishing twin pregnancies be systematically excluded from cell-free fetal DNA testing? Prenat Diagn. 2021; 41: 1241–8.
211Chaveeva, P, Wright, A, Syngelaki, A, et al. First-trimester screening for trisomies in pregnancies with vanishing twin. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 55: 326–31.
213Palomaki, GE, Chiu, RWK, Pertile, MD, et al. International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis position statement: cell free (cf)DNA screening for Down syndrome in multiple pregnancies. Prenat Diagn. 2021; 41: 1222–32.
214American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins – Obstetrics; Committee on Genetics; Society for Maternal–Fetal Medicine. Screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities: ACOG practice bulletin, number 226. Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 136: e48–69.
215di Mascio, D, Khalil, A, Rizzo, G, et al. Risk of fetal loss following amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling in twin pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 56: 647–55.
216Gil, MM, Rodríguez-Fernández, M, Elger, T, et al. Risk of fetal loss after chorionic villus sampling in twin pregnancy derived from propensity score matching analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 59: 162–8.
217Elger, T, Akolekar, R, Syngelaki, A, et al. Fetal loss after chorionic villus sampling in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 58: 48–55.
218Antsaklis, A, Daskalakis, G, Souka, AP, Kavalakis, Y, Michalas, S. Fetal blood sampling in twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 22: 377–9.
219Corcoran, S, Breathnach, F, Burke, G, et al. Dichorionic twin ultrasound surveillance: sonography every 4 weeks significantly underperforms sonography every 2 weeks: results of the prospective multicentre ESPRiT study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 213: 551.e1–5.
220The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstericians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG). Management of Monochorionic Twin Pregnancy. Best practice statement. Melbourne: RANZCOG, 2021.
221FIGO Working Group on Good Clinical Practice in Maternal–Fetal Medicine. Good clinical practice advice: management of twin pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019; 144: 330–7.
222Khalil, A, d’Antonio, F, Dias, T, Cooper, D, Thilaganathan, B. Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK). Ultrasound estimation of birth weight in twin pregnancy: comparison of biometry algorithms in the STORK multiple pregnancy cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 44: 210–20.
223Stirrup, OT, Khalil, A, d’Antonio, F, et al. Fetal growth reference ranges in twin pregnancy: analysis of the Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) multiple pregnancy cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 45(3): 301–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.14640. 224Odibo, AO, Cahill, AG, Goetzinger, KR, et al. Customized growth charts for twin gestations to optimize identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses at risk of intrauterine fetal death. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 41(6): 637–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.12404. 225Kalafat, E, Sebghati, M, Thilaganathan, B, et al. Predictive accuracy of Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) chorionicity-specific twin growth charts for stillbirth: a validation study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 53(2): 193–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.19069. 226Hiersch, L, Barrett, J, Fox, NS, et al. Should twin-specific growth charts be used to assess fetal growth in twin pregnancies? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 227: 10–28.
227Koch, AK, Burger, RJ, Schuit, E, et al. Timing of delivery for twins with growth discordance and growth restriction: an individual participant data meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 139: 1155–67.
228Valsky, DV, Eixarch, E, Martinez, JM, Crispi, F, Gratacós, E. Selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic twins: pathophysiology, diagnostic approach and management dilemmas. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010; 15: 342–8.
229Ishii, K, Murakoshi, T, Takahashi, Y, et al. Perinatal outcome of monochorionic twins with selective intrauterine growth restriction and different types of umbilical artery Doppler under expectant management. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2009; 26: 157–61.
230Townsend, R, d’Antonio, F, Sileo, FG, et al. Perinatal outcome of monochorionic twin pregnancy complicated by selective fetal growth restriction according to management: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(1): 36–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.20114. 231Monaghan, C, Kalafat, E, Binder, J, Thilaganathan, B, Khalil, A. Prediction of adverse pregnancy outcome in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy complicated by selective fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 53: 200–7.
232Townsend, R, Duffy, JMN, Sileo, F, et al. International Collaboration to Harmonise Outcomes for Selective Fetal Growth Restriction (CHOOSE-FGR). Core outcome set for studies investigating management of selective fetal growth restriction in twins. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 55: 652–60.
233Khairudin, D, Khalil, A. Monochorionic monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2022; 84: 96–103.
234Saccone, G, Khalil, A, Thilaganathan, B, et al. Weight discordance and perinatal mortality in monoamniotic twin pregnancy: analysis of MONOMONO, NorSTAMP and STORK multiple-pregnancy cohorts. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 55: 332–8.
235MONOMONO Working Group. Inpatient vs outpatient management and timing of delivery of uncomplicated monochorionic monoamniotic twin pregnancy: the MONOMONO study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 53: 175–83.
236Madsen, C, Sogaard, K, Zingenberg, H, et al. Outcomes of monoamniotic twin pregnancies managed primarily in outpatient care-a Danish multicenter study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019; 98: 479–86.
237Quinn, KH, Cao, CT, Lacoursiere, DY, Schrimmer, D. Monoamniotic twin pregnancy: continuous inpatient electronic fetal monitoring-an impossible goal? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 204: 161e1–6.
238Committee opinion no. 719 summary: multifetal pregnancy reduction. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 130: 670–1.
239Beriwal, S, Impey, L, Ioannou, C. Multifetal pregnancy reduction and selective termination. Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 22: 284–92.
240Dodd, J, Crowther, C. Multifetal pregnancy reduction of triplet and higher-order multiple pregnancies to twins. Fertil Steril. 2004; 81: 1420–2.
241Gaerty, K, Greer, RM, Kumar, S. Systematic review and metaanalysis of perinatal outcomes after radiofrequency ablation and bipolar cord occlusion in monochorionic pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 213: 637–43.
242Anthoulakis, C, Dagklis, T, Mamopoulos, A, Athanasiadis, A. Risks of miscarriage or preterm delivery in trichorionic and dichorionic triplet pregnancies with embryo reduction versus expectant management: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2017; 32: 1351–9.
243Chaveeva, P, Kosinski, P, Puglia, D, Poon, LC, Nicolaides, KH. Trichorionic and dichorionic triplet pregnancies at 10–14 weeks: outcome after embryo reduction compared to expectant management. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2013; 34: 199–205.
244Morlando, M, Ferrara, L, d’Antonio, F, et al. Dichorionic triplet pregnancies: risk of miscarriage and severe preterm delivery with fetal reduction versus expectant management. Outcomes of a cohort study and systematic review. BJOG. 2015; 122: 1053–60.
245Kumar, S, Paramasivam, G, Zhang, E, et al. Perinatal- and procedure-related outcomes following radiofrequency ablation in monochorionic pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 210: 454.e1–6.
246Chaveeva, P, Peeva, G, Pugliese, SG, Shterev, A, Nicolaides, KH. Intrafetal laser ablation for embryo reduction from dichorionic triplets to dichorionic twins. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 50: 632–4.
247Curado, J, d’antonio, F, Papageorghiou, AT, et al. Perinatal mortality and morbidity in triplet pregnancy according to chorionicity: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 54: 589–95.
248Antsaklis, A, Anastasakis, E. Selective reduction in twins and multiple pregnancies. J Perinat Med. 2011; 39: 15–21.
249Zipori, Y, Haas, J, Berger, H, Barzilay, E. Multifetal pregnancy reduction of triplets to twins compared with non-reduced triplets: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017; 35: 296–304.
250Schreiner-Engel, P, Walther, VN, Mindes, J, Lynch, L, Berkowitz, RL. First-trimester multifetal pregnancy reduction: acute and persistent psychologic reactions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 172: 541–7.
251Stone, J, Ferrara, L, Kamrath, J, et al. Contemporary outcomes with the latest 1000 cases of multifetal pregnancy reduction (MPR). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 199: 406.e1–4.
252Bigelow, CA, Factor, SH, Moshier, E, et al. Timing of and outcomes after selective termination of anomalous fetuses in dichorionic twin pregnancies. Prenat Diagn. 2014; 34: 1320–5.
253Sorrenti, S, di Mascio, D, Khalil, A, et al. Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes of early vs late selective termination in dichorionic twin pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023; 61(5): 552–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.26126. 254Ting, YH, Poon, LCY, Tse, WT, et al. Outcome of radiofrequency ablation for selective fetal reduction before vs at or after 16 gestational weeks in complicated monochorionic pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 58: 214–20.
255van den Bos, EM, van Klink, JM, Middeldorp, JM, et al. Perinatal outcome after selective feticide in monochorionic twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 41: 653–8.
256Hillman, S, Morris, R, Kilby, M. Single twin demise: consequence for survivors. Semin Fetal Neonat Med. 2010; 15: 319–26.
257McPherson, JA, Odibo, AO, Shanks, AL, et al. Impact of chorionicity on risk and timing of intrauterine fetal demise in twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 207: 190.e1–6.
258Gurney, L, Morris, RK, Gibson, J, Kilby, M. Fetal demise in twins: single and double fetal loss. In: Twin and Higher-Order Pregnancies. London: Springer, 2021, 205–27.
259Healy, EF, Khalil, A. Single intrauterine death in twin pregnancy: evidenced-based counselling and management. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2022; 84: 205–17.
260Ward, PL, Reidy, KL, Palma-Dias, R, Doyle, LW, Umstad, MP. Single intrauterine death in twins: the importance of fetal order. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2018; 21: 556–62.
261Brassard, M, Fouron, JC, Leduc, L, Grignon, A, Proulx, F. Prognostic markers in twin pregnancies with an acardiac fetus. Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 94: 409–14.
262Mone, F, Devaseelan, P, Ong, S. Intervention versus a conservative approach in the management of TRAP sequence: a systematic review. J Perinat Med. 2016; 44: 619–29.
263Gabby, LC, Chon, AC, Korst, LM, Llanes, A, Chmait, RH. Risk factors for co-twin fetal demise following radiofrequency ablation in multifetal monochorionic gestations. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2020; 47(11): 1–7.
264Wang, H, Zhou, Q, Wang, X, et al. Influence of indications on perinatal outcomes after radio frequency ablation in complicated monochorionic pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021; 21: 41.
265Rahimi-Sharbaf, F, Ghaemi, M, Nassr, AA, Shamshirsaz, AA, Shirazi, M. Radiofrequency ablation for selective fetal reduction in complicated monochorionic twins; comparing the outcomes according to the indications. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021; 21: 189.
266Sun, L, Zou, G, Yang, Y, Zhou, F, Tao, D. Risk factors for fetal death after radiofrequency ablation for complicated monochorionic twin pregnancies. Prenat Diagn. 2018; 38: 499–503.
267Peng, R, Xie, HN, Lin, MF, et al. Clinical outcomes after selective fetal reduction of complicated monochorionic twins with radiofrequency ablation and bipolar cord coagulation. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2016; 81: 552–8.
268Has, R, Kalelioglu, I, Corbacioglu Esmer, A, et al. Bipolar cord coagulation in the management of complicated monochorionic twin pregnancies. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014; 36: 190–5.
269Donepudi, R, Hessami, K, Nassr, AA, et al. Selective reduction in complicated monochorionic pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of different techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 226: 646–55.
270Meng, X, Yuan, P, Gong, L, et al. Forty-five consecutive cases of complicated monochorionic multiple pregnancy treated with microwave ablation: a single-center experience. Prenat Diagn. 2019; 39: 293–8.
271Xie, J, Cheng, Z, Wu, T, Wei, Y, Wang, X. Microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of severe complicated monochorionic pregnancies in China: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020; 10: e034995.
272Tavares de Sousa, M, Glosemeyer, P, Diemert, A, Bamberg, C, Hecher, K. First-trimester intervention in twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 55: 47–9.
273Weber, EC, Recker, F, Gottschalk, I, et al. Outcome of monochorionic monoamniotic twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence diagnosed in the first trimester. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2021; 48: 778–84.
274TRAP Intervention Study:: early versus late intervention for twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence. clinicaltrials.gov. 2017. Report No.: NCT02621645. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02621645 (accessed 15 September 2024). 275Denbow, M, Fogliani, R, Kyle, P, et al. Haematological indices at fetal blood sampling in monochorionic pregnancies complicated by feto-fetal transfusion syndrome. Prenat Diagn. 1998; 18: 941–6.
276Paek, B, Dorn, M, Walker, M. Atypical twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: prevalence in a population undergoing fetoscopic laser ablation of communicating placental vessels. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 215: e1–5.
277Solorio, C, Guenther, JS, Chon, AH, et al. Twin–twin transfusion syndrome and the definition of recipient polyhydramnios. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 225: e1–8.
278Khalil, A. Modified diagnostic criteria for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome prior to 18 weeks’ gestation: time to change? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 49: 804–5.
279Khalil, A, Liu, B. Controversies in the management of twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 57: 888–902.
280Lopriore, E, Sueters, M, Middeldorp, JM, et al. Neonatal outcome in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome treated with fetoscopic laser occlusion of vascular anastomoses. J Pediatr. 2005; 147: 597–602.
281Roberts, D, Neilson, JP, Kilby, MD, Gates, S. Interventions for the treatment of twin–twin transfusion syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (1): CD002073.
282Senat, MV, Deprest, J, Boulvain, M, et al. Endoscopic laser surgery versus serial amnioreduction for severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351: 136–44.
283Crombleholme, TM, Shera, D, Lee, H, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial of amnioreduction vs selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation for the treatment of severe twin–twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 197: 396.e1–9.
284Khalil, A, Cooper, E, Townsend, R, Thilaganathan, B. Evolution of stage 1 twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS): systematic review and meta-analysis. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2016; 19: 207–16.
285di Mascio, D, Khalil, A, d’Amico, A, et al. Outcome of twin–twin transfusion syndrome according to Quintero stage of disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 56: 811–20.
286Stirnemann, J, Slaghekke, F, Khalek, N, et al. Intrauterine fetoscopic laser surgery versus expectant management in stage 1 twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: an international randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 224: 528.e1–e12.
287Wohlmuth, C, Gardiner, HM. Twin–twin transfusion syndrome: don’t rely on fluids and bladders to catch it early. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 59: 7–10.
288Nassr, AA, Hessami, K, Espinoza, J, et al. Gestational age and Quintero staging as predictors of single fetal demise in twin–twin transfusion syndrome after fetoscopic laser photocoagulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJOG Glob Rep. 2022; 2(3): 100055.
289Murgano, D, Khalil, A, Prefumo, F, et al. Outcome of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome in monochorionic monoamniotic twin pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 55: 310–17.
290Lopriore, E, Middeldorp, JM, Oepkes, D, et al. Residual anastomoses after fetoscopic laser surgery in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: frequency, associated risks and outcome. Placenta. 2007; 28: 204–8.
291Robyr, R, Lewi, L, Salomon, LJ, et al. Prevalence and management of late fetal complications following successful selective laser coagulation of chorionic plate anastomoses in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 194: 796–803.
292Slaghekke, F, Lopriore, E, Lewi, L, et al. Fetoscopic laser coagulation of the vascular equator versus selective coagulation for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2014; 383: 2144–51.
293van Klink, JM, Slaghekke, F, Balestriero, MA, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years in twin–twin transfusion syndrome survivors randomized for the Solomon trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 214: 113.e1–7.
294Dhillon, RK, Hillman, SC, Pounds, R, Morris, RK, Kilby, MD. Comparison of Solomon technique against selective laser ablation for twin–twin transfusion syndrome: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 46: 526–31.
295Kanazawa, S, Ozawa, K, Muromoto, J, et al. Risk profiling of the Solomon technique versus selective technique of fetoscopic laser surgery for twin–twin transfusion syndrome. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2021; 24: 42–8.
296Knijnenburg, PJC, Lopriore, E, Ge, Y, et al. Placental abruption after fetoscopic laser surgery in twin–twin transfusion syndrome: the role of the solomon technique. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2021; 48: 660–66.
297Morris, RK, Selman, TJ, Harbidge, A, Martin, WI, Kilby, MD. Fetoscopic laser coagulation for severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: factors influencing perinatal outcome, learning curve of the procedure and lessons for new centres. BJOG. 2010; 117: 1350–7.
298Aboudiab, MS, Chon, AH, Korst, LM, et al. Management of twin–twin transfusion syndrome with an extremely short cervix. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018; 38: 359–62.
299Malshe, A, Snowise, S, Mann, LK, et al. Preterm delivery after fetoscopic laser surgery for twin–twin transfusion syndrome: etiology and risk factors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 49: 612–16.
300Papanna, R, Habli, M, Baschat, AA, et al. Cerclage for cervical shortening at fetoscopic laser photocoagulation in twin–twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 206: 425 e1–7.
301Buskmiller, C, Bergh, EP, Brock, C, et al. Interventions to prevent preterm delivery in women with short cervix before fetoscopic laser surgery for twin–twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 59: 169–76.
302Tollenaar, LSA, Loprior, E, Oepkes, D, et al. Twin anemia polycythemia sequence: knowledge and insights after 15 years of research. Maternal Fetal Medicine 2021; 3(1): 33–41.
303Tollenaar, LSA, Lopriore, E, Middeldorp, JM, et al. Improved prediction of twin anemia–polycythemia sequence by delta middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity: new antenatal classification system. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 53: 788–93.
304Tavares de Sousa, M, Fonseca, A, Hecher, K. Role of fetal intertwin difference in middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity in predicting neonatal twin anemia–polycythemia sequence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 53: 794–7.
305Khalil, A, Gordijn, S, Ganzevoort, W, et al. Consensus diagnostic criteria and monitoring of twin anemia–polycythemia sequence: Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 56: 388–94.
306Baschat, AA , Miller, JL. Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of twin anemia polycythemia sequence in monochorionic multiple gestations. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2022; 84: 115-26.
307Denbow, ML, Eckersley, R, Welsh, AW, et al. Ex vivo delineation of placental angioarchitecture with the microbubble contrast agent levovist. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 182: 966–71.
308Slaghekke, F, Kist, WJ, Oepkes, D, et al. Twin anemia–polycythemia sequence: diagnostic criteria, classification, perinatal management and outcome. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2010; 27: 181–90.
309Bahtiyar, MO, Ekmekci, E, Demirel, E, Irani, RA, Copel, JA. In utero partial exchange transfusion combined with in utero blood transfusion for prenatal management of twin anemia–polycythemia sequence. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2019; 45: 28–35.
310Herway, C, Johnson, A, Moise, K, Moise, K J. Fetal intraperitoneal transfusion for iatrogenic twin anemia–polycythemia sequence after laser therapy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 33: 592–4.
311Tollenaar, LSA, Slaghekke, F, Lewi, L, et al. Treatment and outcome of 370 cases with spontaneous or post-laser twin anemia–polycythemia sequence managed in 17 fetal therapy centers. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 56: 378–87.
312Gibson, JL, Castleman, JS, Meher, S, Kilby, MD. Updated guidance for the management of twin and triplet pregnancies from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance, UK: what’s new that may improve perinatal outcomes? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020; 99: 147–52.
313Giorgione, V, d’Antonio, F, Manji, A, Reed, K, Khalil, A. Perinatal outcome of pregnancy complicated by twin anemia–polycythemia sequence: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 58: 813–23.
314Leiden University Medical Center. The TAPS Trial – fetoscopic laser surgery for twin anemia polycythemia sequence. clinicaltrials.gov. 2020. Report No.: NCT04432168. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04432168 (accessed 15 September 2024). 315Tollenaar, LSA, Lopriore, E, Slaghekke, F, et al. High risk of long-term neurodevelopmental impairment in donor twins with spontaneous twin anemia–polycythemia sequence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 55: 39–46.
316Greco, PS, Pitts, D, Weadock, WJ, et al. Conjoined twins: an obstetrician’s guide to prenatal care and delivery management. J Perinatol. 202; 41: 2424–31.
317Afzal, AR, Montero, FJ. Conjoined Twins. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing, 2022.
318Sager, EC, Thomas, A, Sundgren, NC. Conjoined twins: pre-birth management, changes to NRP, and transport. Semin Perinatol. 2018; 42: 321–8.
319Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Sutton, PD, et al. National Vital Statistics Report 2010. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2010; 59(1): 3–71.
320Stoenescu, A, Friedl, WPT, de-Gregorio, N, et al. A single-center cohort study on 1663 twin births from two decades: a descriptive statistics and general trends. Gynecol Obstet (Sunnyvale). 2020; 10: 520.
321Dodd, JM, Deussen, AR, Grivell, RM, Crowther, CA. Elective birth at 37 weeks’ gestation for women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (2): CD003582.
322Dodd, JM, Crowther, CA, Haslam, RR, Robinson, JS. Elective birth at 37 weeks of gestation versus standard care for women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy at term: the Twins Timing of Birth Randomised Trial. BJOG. 2012; 119: 964–73.
323Cheong-See, F, Schuit, E, Arroyo-Manzano, D, et al. Prospective risk of stillbirth and neonatal complications in twin pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2016; 354: i4353.
324Bibbo, C, Robinson, JN. Management of twins: vaginal or cesarean delivery? Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 58: 294–308.
325Lee, YM. Delivery of twins. Semin Perinatol. 2012; 36: 195–200.
326The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstericians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG). Management of Breech Presentation. Best practice statement. Melbourne, RANZCOG, 2021.
327Hannah, ME, Hannah, WJ, Hewson, SA, et al. Planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2000; 356: 1375–83.
328Hofmeyr, GJ, Hannah, M, Lawrie, TA. Planned cesarean section for term breech delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; (7): CD000166.
329Hogle, KL, Hutton, EK, McBrien, KA, Barrett, JF, Hannah, ME. Cesarean delivery for twins: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 188: 220–7.
330Steins Bisschop, CN, Vogelvang, TE, May, AM, Schuitemaker, NW. Mode of delivery in non-cephalic presenting twins: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012; 286: 237–47.
331Korb, D, Goffinet, F, Bretelle, F, et al. First twin in breech presentation and neonatal mortality and morbidity according to planned mode of delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 135: 1015–23.
332Felder, L, McCurdy, R, Berghella, V. External cephalic version of the non-cephalic presenting twin: a systematic review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022; 35: 1712–18.
333Impey, LWM, Murphy, DJ, Griffiths, M, Penna, LK, on behalf of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Management of breech presentation. BJOG. 2017; 124: e151–77.
334Rossi, AC, Mullin, PM, Chmait, RH. Neonatal outcomes of twins according to birth order, presentation and mode of delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2011; 118: 523–32.
335Barrett, JF, Hannah, ME, Hutton, EK, et al. Twin Birth Study Collaborative Group. A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369: 1295–305.
336Asztalos, EV, Hannah, ME, Hutton, EK, et al. Twin birth study: 2 year neurodevelopmental follow-up of the randomized trial of planned caesarean or planned vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214(3): 371.e1–19.
337Vogel, JP, Holloway, E, Cuesta, C, et al. Outcomes of non-vertex second twins, following vertex vaginal delivery of first twin: a secondary analysis of the WHO Global Survey on maternal and perinatal health. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14: 55.
338Cohen, R, Kashani Ligumsky, L, Lopian, M, et al. Is vaginal delivery of a breech second twin safe? A comparison between delivery of vertex and non-vertex second twins. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022; 35: 8852–5.
339Schmitz, T, Korb, D, Battie, C, et al. Neonatal morbidity associated with vaginal delivery of noncephalic second twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 218: 449.e1–449.e13.
340Cahill, A, Stamilio, D, Pare, E, Peipert, J, Macones, G. Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) in twin pregnancies: Is it safe? Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004; 191(6), suppl. S183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.10.557. 341Myles, T. Vaginal birth of twins after a previous cesarean section. J Matern Fetal Med. 2001; 10: 171–4.
342Hochler, H, Tevet, A, Barg, M, et al. Trial of labor of vertex-nonvertex twins following a previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022; 4: 100640.
343Baradaran, K. Risk of uterine rupture with vaginal birth after cesarean in twin gestations. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2021; 2021: 6693142.
344Gerten, KA, Coonrod, DV, Bay, RC, Chambliss, LR. Cesarean delivery and respiratory distress syndrome: does labor make a difference? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 193(3 Pt 2): 1061–4.
345Vidic, Z, Blickstein, I, Štucin Gantar, I, Verdenik, I, Tul, N. Timing of elective cesarean section and neonatal morbidity: a population-based study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016; 29: 2461–3.
346Bricelj, K, Tul, N, Lasic, M, et al. Respiratory morbidity in twins by birth order, gestational age and mode of delivery. J Perinat Med. 2016; 44: 899–902.
347Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RCOG). Antenatal Corticosteroids to Reduce Neonatal Morbidity and Mortality. Green-top guideline no. 74. London: RCOG, 2022.
348Negrini, R, da Silva Ferreira, RD, Guimarães, DZ. Value-based care in obstetrics: comparison between vaginal birth and cesarean section. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021; 21: 333.
349Mol, BW, Bergenhenegouwen, L, Ensing, S, Ravelli, AC, Kok, M. The impact of mode of delivery on the outcome in very preterm twins. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020; 33: 2089–95.
350Sentilhes, L, Lorthe, E, Marchand-Martin, L, et al. Planned mode of delivery of preterm twins and neonatal and 2-year outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 133: 71–80.
351Yang, Q, Wen, SW, Chen, Y, et al. Neonatal death and morbidity in vertex-nonvertex second twins according to mode of delivery and birth weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 192: 840–7.
352Dagenais, C, Lewis-Mikhael, AM, Grabovac, M, Mukerji, A, McDonald, SD. What is the safest mode of delivery for extremely preterm cephalic/non-cephalic twin pairs? A systematic review and meta-analyses. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017; 17: 397.
353Hiersch, L, Shah, PS, McDonald, SD, Barrett, J, Melamed, N. 946: Mode of delivery and the risk of adverse outcomes in preterm twins <28 weeks. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 222: S586–7.
354Tucker Edmonds, B, McKenzie, F, Macheras, M, Srinivas, SK, Lorch, SA. Morbidity and mortality associated with mode of delivery for breech periviable deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 213: 70.e1–12.
355McDonald, SD, Narvey, M, Ehman, W, Jain, V, Cassell, K. Guideline No. 424: Umbilical cord management in preterm and term infants. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2022; 44: 313–322.e1.
356Grabovac, M, Beltempo, M, Lodha, A, et al. Impact of deferred cord clamping on mortality and severe neurologic injury in twins born at <30 weeks of gestation. J Pediatr. 2021; 238: 118–23.e3.
357Liu, LY, Yee, LM. Delayed cord clamping in preterm dichorionic twin gestations. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019; 26: 1–5.
358Ruangkit, C, Bumrungphuet, S, Panburana, P, Khositseth, A, Nuntnarumit, P. A randomized controlled trial of immediate versus delayed umbilical cord clamping in multiple-birth infants born preterm. Neonatology. 2019; 115: 156–63.
359Acker, D, Lieberman, M, Holbrook, RH, et al. Delivery of the second twin. Obstet Gynecol. 1982; 59: 710–11.
360Chervenak, FA, Johnson, RE, Berkowitz, RL, Hobbins, JC. Intrapartum external version of the second twin. Obstet Gynecol.1983; 62: 160–5.
361Chauhan, SP, Roberts, WE, McLaren, RA, et al. Delivery of the nonvertex second twin: breech extraction versus external cephalic version. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 173: 1015–20.
362Webster, SN, Loughney, AD. Internal podalic version with breech extraction. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 13: 7–14.
363Stein, W, Misselwitz, B, Schmidt, S. Twin-to-twin delivery time interval: influencing factors and effect on short-term outcome of the second twin. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008; 87: 346–53.
364Lindroos, L, Elfvin, A, Ladfors, L, Wennerholm, UB. The effect of twin-to-twin delivery time intervals on neonatal outcome for second twins. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018; 18: 36.
365Leung, TY, Tam, WH, Leung, TN, Lok, IH, Lau, TK. Effect of twin-to-twin delivery interval on umbilical cord blood gas in the second twins. BJOG. 2002; 109: 63–7.
366Cukierman, R, Heland, S, Palmer, K, et al. Inter-twin delivery interval, short-term perinatal outcomes and risk of cesarean for the second twin. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019; 59: 375–9.
367McGrail, CD, Bryant, DR. Intertwin time interval: how it affects the immediate neonatal outcome of the second twin. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 192: 1420–2.
368Wenze, SJ, Battle, CL, Tezanos, KM. Raising multiples: mental health of mothers and fathers in early parenthood. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2015; 18: 163–76.
369Robertson, E, Celasun, N, Stewart, DE. Risk factors for postpartum depression. In: Stewart, DE, Robertson, E, Dennis, CL, Grace, SL, Wallington, T (eds.), Postpartum Depression: Literature Review of Risk Factors and Interventions. Toronto: Toronto Public Health, 2003.
370Smith, LK, Manktelow, BN, Draper, ED, et al. Trends in the incidence and mortality of multiple births by socioeconomic deprivation and maternal age in England: population-based cohort study. BMJ Open. 2014; 4: e004514.
