Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
    • You have access
    • Open access
  • Cited by 7
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
August 2023
Print publication year:
2023
Online ISBN:
9781009008655
Creative Commons:
Creative Common License - CC Creative Common License - BY Creative Common License - NC
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/creativelicenses
Series:
Elements in the Philosophy of Science

Book description

Scientists cannot devise theories, construct models, propose explanations, make predictions, or even carry out observations, without first classifying their subject matter. The goal of scientific taxonomy is to come up with classification schemes that conform to nature's own. Another way of putting this is that science aims to devise categories that correspond to 'natural kinds.' The interest in ascertaining the real kinds of things in nature is as old as philosophy itself, but it takes on a different guise when one adopts a naturalist stance in philosophy, that is when one looks closely at scientific practice and takes it as a guide for identifying natural kinds and investigating their general features. This Element surveys existing philosophical accounts of natural kinds, defends a naturalist alternative, and applies it to case studies in a diverse set of sciences. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.

References

Ahn, W., Kalish, C., Gelman, S. A. et al. (2001). Why essences are essential in the psychology of concepts. Cognition 82, 5969.
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th edition. American Psychiatric Association.
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1971). Causality and determination: An inaugural lecture. Cambridge University Press.
Armstrong, D. (1989). Universals: An opinionated introduction. Westview Press.
Arnaud, S. (2022). A social–emotional salience account of emotion recognition in autism: Moving beyond theory of mind. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 42(1), 318.
Barnett, D. J. (2011). Pandemic influenza and its definitional implications. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 89(7), 539.
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., and Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition 21(1), 3746.
Bechtel, W. (2009). Looking down, around, and up: Mechanistic explanation in psychology. Philosophical Psychology 22(5), 543564.
Bird, A. (2018). The metaphysics of natural kinds. Synthese 195(4), 13971426.
Bogen, J. (1988). Comments on “the sociology of knowledge about child abuse.Noûs 22(1), 6566.
Bokulich, A. (2014). Pluto and the “Planet Problem”: Folk concepts and natural kinds in astronomy. Perspectives on Science 22(4), 464490.
Borsboom, D. (2017). A network theory of mental disorders. World Psychiatry 16(1), 513.
Borsboom, D., and Cramer, A. O. (2013). Network analysis: An integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 9(1), 91121.
Borsboom, D., Cramer, A. O., and Kalis, A. (2019). Brain disorders? Not really: Why network structures block reductionism in psychopathology research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 42, 1–63.
Boucher, J. (2012). Putting theory of mind in its place: Psychological explanations of the socio-emotional-communicative impairments in autistic spectrum disorder. Autism 16(3), 226246.
Boyd, R. (1989). What realism implies and what it does not. Dialectica 43(1–2), 529.
Boyd, R. (1999). Homeostasis, species, and higher taxa. In Wilson, R. A. (ed.), Species: New interdisciplinary essays (pp. 141186). Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
Boyd, R. (2000). Kinds as the “workmanship of men”: Realism, constructivism, and natural kinds. In Nida-Rümelin, J. (ed.), Rationality, realism, revision (pp. 5289). Walter de Gruyter.
Boyd, R. (2021). Rethinking natural kinds, reference and truth: Towards more correspondence with reality, not less. Synthese 198(12), 28632903.
Bringmann, L. F., and Eronen, M. I. (2018). Don’t blame the model: Reconsidering the network approach to psychopathology. Psychological Review 125(4), 606615.
Broad, C. D. (1920). The relation between induction and probability (Part II). Mind 29(113), 1145.
Bursten, J. R. (2020). Smaller than a breadbox: Scale and natural kinds. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 69(1), 123.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012). Principles of epidemiology in public health practice, 3rd edition. US Department of Health and Human Services.
Chakravartty, A. (2007). A metaphysics for scientific realism: Knowing the unobservable. Cambridge University Press.
Chen, L., DeVries, A. L., and Cheng, C. H. C. (1997). Convergent evolution of antifreeze glycoproteins in Antarctic notothenioid fish and Arctic cod. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94(8), 38173822.
Cooper, R. (2004). Why hacking is wrong about human kinds. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55(1), 7385.
Crane, J. K. (2021). Two approaches to natural kinds. Synthese 199(5–6), 1217712198.
Craver, C. F. (2007). Explaining the brain. Oxford University Press.
Craver, C. F. (2009). Mechanisms and natural kinds. Philosophical Psychology 22(5), 575594.
Darden, L., and Maull, N. (1977). Interfield theories. Philosophy of Science 44(1), 4364.
Doshi, P. (2011). The elusive definition of pandemic influenza. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 89(7), 532538.
Dupré, J. (2002). Is “natural kind” a natural kind term? The Monist 85(1), 2949.
Elder, C. (2004). Real natures and familiar objects. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
Ellis, B. (2001). Scientific essentialism. Cambridge University Press.
Ereshefsky, M. (2001). The poverty of the Linnaean hierarchy. Cambridge University Press.
Ereshefsky, M., and Matthen, M. (2005). Taxonomy, polymorphism, and history: An introduction to population structure theory. Philosophy of Science 72(1), 121.
Ereshefsky, M., and Reydon, T. A. (2015). Scientific kinds. Philosophical Studies 172(4), 969986.
Fodor, J. A. (1974). Special sciences (or: the disunity of science as a working hypothesis. Synthese 28(2), 97–115.
Franklin, F., and Franklin, C. L. (1888). Mill’s natural kinds. Mind 13(49), 8385.
Franklin-Hall, L. (2015). Natural kinds as categorical bottlenecks. Philosophical Studies 172(4), 925948.
Ghiselin, M. T. (1974). A radical solution to the species problem. Systematic Biology 23(4), 536544.
Glennan, S. (2017). The new mechanical philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Godman, M. (2021). The epistemology and morality of human kinds. Routledge.
Goodman, N. (1955/1983). Fact, fiction, and forecast. Harvard University Press.
Griffiths, P. E. (1993). Functional analysis and proper functions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44(3), 409422.
Griffiths, P. E. (1994). Cladistic classification and functional explanation. Philosophy of Science 61(2), 206227.
Griffiths, P. E. (1999). Squaring the circle: Natural kinds with historical essences. In Wilson, R. A. (ed.), Species: New interdisciplinary essays (pp. 209228). Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
Hacking, I. (1991a). A tradition of natural kinds. Philosophical Studies 61(1–2), 109126.
Hacking, I. (1991b). The making and molding of child abuse. Critical Inquiry 17(2), 253288.
Hacking, I. (1995). The looping effects of human kinds. In Sperber, D., Premack, D., and Premack, A. J. (eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 351394). Oxford University Press.
Hacking, I. (2006). Kinds of people: Moving targets. Proceedings of the British Academy 151, 285318.
Hacking, I. (2007). Natural kinds: Rosy dawn, scholastic twilight. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements 61, 203239.
Happé, F., Ronald, A., and Plomin, R. (2006). Time to give up on a single explanation for autism. Nature Neuroscience 9(10), 12181220.
Haslanger, S. (1995). Ontology and social construction. Philosophical Topics 23(2), 95125.
Havstad, J. C. (2021). Complexity begets crosscutting, dooms hierarchy (another paper on natural kinds). Synthese 198(8), 76657696.
Hawley, K., and Bird, A. (2011). What are natural kinds? Philosophical Perspectives 25(1), 205221.
Hempel, C. G. (1965). Fundamentals of taxonomy. In Hempel, C. G., Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science (pp. 137154). Free Press.
Hull, D. (1978). A matter of individuality. Philosophy of Science 45(3), 335360.
International Astronomical Union. (2006). Resolution B5: Definition of a planet in the solar system. www.iau.org/static/resolutions/Resolution_GA26-5-6.pdf.
Kahane, H. (1969). Thomason on natural kinds. Noûs 3(4), 409412.
Keil, F. C. (2003). Folkscience: Coarse interpretations of a complex reality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(8), 368373.
Kelly, H. (2011). The classical definition of a pandemic is not elusive. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 89(7), 540541.
Khalidi, M. A. (1993). Carving nature at the joints. Philosophy of Science 60(1), 100113.
Khalidi, M. A. (1998). Natural kinds and crosscutting categories. Journal of Philosophy 95(1), 3350.
Khalidi, M. A. (2009). How scientific is scientific essentialism? Journal for General Philosophy of Science 40(1), 85101.
Khalidi, M. A. (2010). Interactive kinds. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61(2), 335360.
Khalidi, M. A. (2013). Natural categories and human kinds: Classification in the natural and social sciences. Cambridge University Press.
Khalidi, M. A. (2017). Crosscutting psycho-neural taxonomies: The case of episodic memory. Philosophical Explorations 20(2), 191208.
Khalidi, M. A. (2018). Natural kinds as nodes in causal networks. Synthese 195(4), 13791396.
Khalidi, M. A. (2020). Are sexes natural kinds? In Dasgupta, S., Dotan, R., and Weslake, B. (eds.), Current controversies in philosophy of science (pp. 163176). Routledge.
Khalidi, M. A. (2021). Etiological kinds. Philosophy of Science 88(1), 1–21.
Kim, J. (1992). Multiple realization and the metaphysics of reduction. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52(1), 126.
Kitcher, P. (1992). The naturalists return. Philosophical Review 101(1), 53114.
Kitcher, P. (2001). Science, truth, and democracy. Oxford University Press.
Kripke, S. (1972/1980). Naming and necessity. Harvard University Press.
Langton, R., and Lewis, D. (1998). Defining “intrinsic.Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58(2), 333345.
Lemeire, O. (2021). No purely epistemic theory can account for the naturalness of kinds. Synthese 198(12), 29072925.
Lewis, D. (1983). Extrinsic properties. Philosophical Studies 44(2), 197200.
Ludwig, D. (2018). Letting go of “natural kind”: Towards a multidimensional framework of non-arbitrary classification. Philosophy of Science 85(1), 3152.
Machamer, P., Darden, L., and Craver, C. F. (2000). Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science 67(1), 125.
Magnus, P. D. (2012). Scientific enquiry and natural kinds: From planets to mallards. Palgrave Macmillan.
Magnus, P. D. (2013). No grist for Mill on natural kinds. Journal for the History of Analytic Philosophy 2(4), 115.
Magnus, P. D. (2014). NK ≠ HPC. The Philosophical Quarterly 64(256), 471477.
Magnus, P. D. (2018). How to be a realist about natural kinds. Disputatio: Philosophical Research Bulletin 7(8), 111.
Mallon, R. (2003). Social construction, social roles, and stability. In Schmitt, F. (ed.), Socializing metaphysics: The nature of social reality (pp. 327354). Rowman & Littlefield.
Massimi, M. (2014). Natural kinds and naturalised Kantianism. Noûs 48(3), 416449.
Mattu, J., and Sullivan, J. A. (2021). Classification, kinds, taxonomic stability and conceptual change. Aggression and Violent Behavior 59(1), 101477.
McMillen, C. W. (2016). Pandemics: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
Mill, J. S. (1843/1882). A system of logic (8th edition). Harper & Brothers.
Millikan, R. (1999). Historical kinds and the “special sciences.Philosophical Studies 95(1–2), 4565.
Millikan, R. (2000). On clear and confused ideas: An essay about substance concepts. Cambridge University Press.
Millikan, R. (2005). Why (most) concepts aren’t categories. In Cohen, H. and Lefebvre, C. (eds.), Handbook of categorization in cognitive science (pp. 305316). Elsevier.
Mitchell, S. (2000). Dimensions of scientific law. Philosophy of Science 67(2), 242265.
Morens, D. M., Folkers, G. K., and Fauci, A. S. (2009). What is a pandemic? The Journal of Infectious Diseases 200(7), 10181021.
Murphy, D. (2006). Psychiatry in the scientific image. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
Page, M. (2021). The role of historical science in methodological actualism. Philosophy of Science 88(3), 461482.
Papineau, D. (2010). Can any sciences be special? In Macdonald, C. and Macdonald, G. (eds.), Emergence in mind (pp. 179–197). Oxford University Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1901). “Kind.” In Baldwin, J. M. (ed.), Dictionary of philosophy and psychology. Macmillan. http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Baldwin/Dictionary/defs/K1defs.htm#Kind.
Porta, M. (2014). A dictionary of epidemiology. Oxford University Press.
Pöyhönen, S. (2016). Memory as a cognitive kind: Brains, remembering dyads, and exograms. In Kendig, C. (ed.), Natural kinds and classification in scientific practice (pp. 145156). Routledge.
Putnam, H. (1975). Mathematics, matter, and method. Cambridge University Press.
Quine, W. V. (1969). Natural kinds. In Quine, W. V., Ontological relativity and other essays (pp. 114138). Columbia University Press.
Reydon, T. A. C. (2006). Generalizations and kinds in natural science: The case of species. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37(2), 230255.
Reydon, T. A. C. (2016). From a zooming-in model to a co-creation model: Towards a more dynamic account of classification and kinds. In Kendig, C. (ed.), Natural kinds and classification in scientific practice (pp. 5973). Routledge.
Ross, L. N. (2020). Causal concepts in biology: How pathways differ from mechanisms and why it matters. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72(1), 131158.
Santana, C. (2019). Mineral misbehavior: Why mineralogists don’t deal in natural kinds. Foundations of Chemistry 21(3), 333343.
Schaffer, J. (2003). Is there a fundamental level? Nous 37(3), 498–517.
Singer, B. J., Thompson, R. N., and Bonsall, M. B. (2021). The effect of the definition of “pandemic” on quantitative assessments of infectious disease outbreak risk. Scientific Reports 11(1), 113.
Slater, M. H. (2015). Natural kindness. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66(2), 375411.
Slater, M. H. (2017). Pluto and the platypus: An odd ball and an odd duck – on classificatory norms. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 61, 110.
Tahko, T. (2021). Unity of science. Cambridge University Press.
Tekin, Ş. (2014). Psychiatric taxonomy: At the crossroads of science and ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 40(8), 513514.
Thomason, R. H. (1969). Determinates and natural kinds. Noûs 3(1), 95101.
Tobin, E. (2010). Crosscutting natural kinds and the hierarchy thesis. In Beebee, H. and Sabbarton-Leary, N. (eds.), The semantics and metaphysics of natural kinds (pp. 179191). Routledge.
Tsou, J. Y. (2021). Philosophy of psychiatry. Cambridge University Press.
Van Valen, L. (1973). A new evolutionary law. Evolutionary Theory 1, 130.
Van Valen, L. (1976). Individualistic classes. Philosophy of Science 43(4), 539541.
Venn, J. (1866/1888). The logic of chance (3rd edition). Macmillan.
Venn, J. (1889/1907). The principles of empirical or inductive logic (2nd edition). Macmillan.
Weiskopf, D. (2011a). The functional unity of special science kinds. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62(2), 233258.
Weiskopf, D. (2011b). Models and mechanisms in psychological explanation. Synthese 183(3), 313338.
Weiskopf, D. (2017). An ideal disorder? Autism as a psychiatric kind. Philosophical Explorations 20(2), 175190.
Whewell, W. (1840/1847). The philosophy of the inductive sciences (2nd edition). John, W. Parker.
Wilson, R. A., Barker, M. J., and Brigandt, I. (2007). When traditional essentialism fails: Biological natural kinds. Philosophical Topics 35(1/2), 189215.
Wimsatt, W. C. (2007). Re-engineering philosophy for limited beings: Piecewise approximations to reality. Harvard University Press.
Zachar, P. (2014). A metaphysics of psychopathology. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.