Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 66
    • Show more authors
    • You may already have access via personal or institutional login
    • Select format
    • Publisher:
      Cambridge University Press
      Publication date:
      30 March 2010
      26 November 2009
      ISBN:
      9780511691867
      9780521111232
      9781107411845
      Dimensions:
      (228 x 152 mm)
      Weight & Pages:
      0.5kg, 240 Pages
      Dimensions:
      (229 x 152 mm)
      Weight & Pages:
      0.37kg, 240 Pages
    You may already have access via personal or institutional login
  • Selected: Digital
    Add to cart View cart Buy from Cambridge.org

    Book description

    In matters of rights, constitutions tend to avoid settling controversies. With few exceptions, rights are formulated in open-ended language, seeking consensus on an abstraction without purporting to resolve the many moral-political questions implicated by rights. The resulting view has been that rights extend everywhere but are everywhere infringed by legislation seeking to resolve the very moral-political questions the constitution seeks to avoid. The Negotiable Constitution challenges this view. Arguing that underspecified rights call for greater specification, Grégoire C. N. Webber draws on limitation clauses common to most bills of rights to develop a new understanding of the relationship between rights and legislation. The legislature is situated as a key constitutional actor tasked with completing the specification of constitutional rights. In turn, because the constitutional project is incomplete with regards to rights, it is open to being re-negotiated by legislation struggling with the very moral-political questions left underdetermined at the constitutional level.

    Reviews

    Review of the hardback:'Webber offers an elegant and vigorous argument against what he takes to be the 'received approach' to the limitation of constitutional rights.'

    Julian Rivers Source: Public Law

    Review of the hardback:'Webber offers … an ambitious reconceptualization of constitutions and their rights … his most fundamental positive thesis … is that constitutional rights are actually constituted by their accompanying limitations clause … the synthesis itself is indeed novel and, I think, a real contribution to the literature on constitutional theory …'

    John Oberdiek Source: Constitutional Commentary

    Review of the hardback:'Webber's discussion of the limitation of rights comes with a more general theory of the constitution … It is, thus, a book of impressive breadth.'

    Charles-Maxime Panaccio Source: International Journal of Constitutional Law

    Review of the hardback:'Webber's book invites us to think about rights in new ways and is a welcome contribution to constitutional theory discourse.'

    Dwight Newman Source: Alberta Law Review

    Refine List

    Actions for selected content:

    Select all | Deselect all
    • View selected items
    • Export citations
    • Download PDF (zip)
    • Save to Kindle
    • Save to Dropbox
    • Save to Google Drive

    Save Search

    You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

    Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
    ×

    Contents

    Bibliography
    Ackerman, B.The Living Constitution’ (2007) 120 Harvard Law Review1737
    Ackerman, B.Discovering the Constitution’ (1984) 93 Yale Law Journal1013
    Ackerman, B.We the People: Foundations (Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press, 1991)
    Aleinikoff, T. A.Constitutional Law in the Age of Balancing’ (1987) 96 Yale Law Journal943
    Alexander, L. ‘Introduction’ in Alexander, L. (ed) Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998)
    Alexy, R.Balancing, constitutional review, and representation’ (2005) 3 International Journal of Constitutional Law572
    Alexy, R.Constitutional Rights, Balancing, and Rationality’ (2003) 16 Ratio Juris131
    Alexy, R.On Balancing and Subsumption. A Structural Comparison’ (2003) 16 Ratio Juris433
    Alexy, R.A Theory of Constitutional Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002)
    Allan, T. R. S.Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)
    Amar, A. R.The Consent of the Governed: Constitutional Amendment Outside Article V’ (1994) 94 Columbia Law Review457
    Arthurs, H.Constitutional Courage’ (2003) 49 McGill Law Journal1
    Audi, R.The Place of Religious Argument in a Free and Democratic Society’ (1993) 30 San Diego Law Review677
    Barak, A.Purposive Interpretation in Law (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005)
    Barnett, R. E.An Originalism for Nonoriginalists’ (1999) 45 Loyola Law Review611
    Barnett, R. E.Underlying Principles’ (2007) 24 Constitutional Commentary405
    Barnett, R. E.Restoring the Lost Constitution: The Presumption of Liberty (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004)
    Beatty, D. M.The Ultimate Rule of Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004)
    Beetham, D.The Legitimation of Power (London: MacMillan Press, 1991)
    Bellamy, R.Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007)
    Berlin, I. ‘Does Political Theory Still Exist?’ in Hardy, H. and Hausheer, R. (eds) Isaiah Berlin: The Proper Study of Mankind. An Anthology of Essays (London: Chatto & Windus, 1997)
    Berlin, I. ‘Two Concepts of Liberty’ in Hardy, H. (ed) Liberty (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002)
    Bickel, A.The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics (2nd edn, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986)
    Black, H. L.Constitutional Faith (New York: Knopf, 1968)
    Botterell, A. M. ‘In Defence of Infringement’ (2008) 27 Law and Philosophy269
    Brugger, W.May Government Ever Use Torture? Two Responses from German Law’ (2000) 48 American Journal of Comparative Law661
    Chang, R. (ed). Incommensurability, Incompatibility, and Practical Reason (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1997)
    Constant, B. ‘The Liberty of the Ancients Compared with That of the Moderns’ in Fontana, B. (ed) Benjamin Constant: Political Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988)
    Dworkin, R. ‘It is absurd to calculate human rights according to a cost-benefit analysis’ Guardian (London 24 May 2006)
    Dworkin, R. ‘Rights as Trumps’ in Waldron, J. (ed) Theories of Rights (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989)
    Dworkin, R.A Matter of Principle (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1985)
    Dworkin, R.Freedom's Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1996)
    Dworkin, R.Is Democracy Possible Here? Principles for a New Political Debate (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006)
    Dworkin, R.Law's Empire (Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press, 1986)
    Dworkin, R.Taking Rights Seriously (new impression, London: Duckworth, 2000)
    Ellis, E. (ed). The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1999)
    Ely, J. H.Flag Desecration: A Case Study in the Roles of Categorization and Balancing in First Amendment Analysis’ (1975) 88 Harvard Law Review1482
    Ely, J. H.Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1980)
    Fallon, Jr, R. H.The Core of an Uneasy Case for Judicial Review’ (2008) 121 Harvard Law Review1693
    Feinberg, J.Voluntary Euthanasia and the Inalienable Right to Life’ (1978) 7 Philosophy and Public Affairs93
    Finnis, J.A Bill of Rights for Britain? The Moral of Contemporary Jurisprudence’ (1985) 71 Proceedings of the British Academy303
    Finnis, J. ‘Abortion, Natural Law, and Public Reason’ in George, R. P and Wolfe, C. (eds) Natural Law and Public Reason (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2000)
    Finnis, J. ‘Commensuration and Public Reason’ in Chang, R. (ed) Incommensurability, Incompatibility, and Practical Reason (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1997)
    Finnis, J. ‘Natural Law and Legal Reasoning’ in George, R. P (ed) Natural Law Theory: Contemporary Essays (New York: Clarendon Press, 1992)
    Finnis, J.Natural Law and the Ethics of Discourse’ (1999) 12 Ratio Juris354
    Finnis, J. ‘On “Public Reason”’ (2007) Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1/2007
    Finnis, J.On “The Critical Legal Studies Movement”’ (1985) 30 American Journal of Jurisprudence21
    Finnis, J. ‘Revolutions and Continuity of Law’ in Simpson, A. W. B (ed) Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (Second Series) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973)
    Finnis, J.Public Reason, Abortion, and Cloning’ (1998) 32 Valparaiso University Law Review361
    Finnis, J.Some Professorial Fallacies About Rights’ (1971–1972) 4 Adelaide Law Review377
    Finnis, J.Fundamentals of Ethics (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983)
    Finnis, J.Natural Law and Natural Rights (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980)
    Finnis, J.O Racji Publicznej [On ‘Public Reason’] (Warsaw: Ius et Lex, 2005)
    Fordham, M. and Mare, T.. ‘Identifying the Principles of Proportionality’ in Jowell, J. and Cooper, J. (eds) Understanding Human Rights Principles (Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2001)
    Frantz, L. B.The First Amendment in the Balance’ (1962) 71 Yale Law Journal1424
    Fuller, L. L.The Morality of Law (revd edn, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969)
    Gardbaum, S.Limiting Constitutional Rights’ (2007) 54 UCLA Law Review789
    Gardner, J. ‘Some types of law’ in Edlin, D. E. (ed) Common Law Theory (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007)
    Garibaldi, O. M.General Limitations on Human Rights: The Principle of Legality’ (1976) 17 Harvard International Law Journal503
    Gewirth, A. ‘Are There Any Absolute Rights?’ in Waldron, J. (ed) Theories of Rights (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989)
    Glendon, M. A.Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse (New York: The Free Press, 1991)
    Goldsworthy, J.The Sovereignty of Parliament: History and Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999)
    Greer, S.“Balancing” and the European Court of Human Rights: A Contribution to the Habermas-Alexy Debate’ (2004) 63 Cambridge Law Journal412
    Greer, S.Constitutionalizing Adjudication under the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2003) 23 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies426
    Greer, S.The European Convention on Human Rights: Achievements, Problems and Prospects (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)
    Greer, S.The Exceptions to Articles 8 to 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 1999)
    Griffith, J. A. G.The Political Constitution’ (1979) 42 Modern Law Review1
    Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D.. Democracy and Disagreement (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1996)
    Habermas, J.Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles?’ (2001) 29 Political Theory766
    Habermas, J.Reconciliation Through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls's Political Liberalism’ (1995) 92 Journal of Philosophy109
    Habermas, J. ‘Struggles for Recognition in the Democratic Constitutional State’ in Gutmann, A (ed) Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994)
    Habermas, J.Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2004)
    Hart, H. L. A.The Concept of Law (2nd edn, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994)
    Hiebert, J. L.Limiting Rights: The Dilemma of Judicial Review (Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1996)
    Hogg, P. W. ‘Canada: From Privy Council to Supreme Court’ in Goldsworthy, J. (ed) Interpreting Constitutions: A Comparative Study (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006)
    Hogg, P. W.Section 1 Revisited’ (1991–1992) 1 National Journal of Constitutional Law1
    Hohfeld, W. N.Fundamental Legal Conceptions As Applied in Judicial Reasoning (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1919)
    Holmes, S.Passions and Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995)
    Huscroft, G.Is the defeat of health warnings a victory for human rights? The Attorney-General and pre-legislative scrutiny for consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights’ (2003) 14 Public Law Review109
    Jackson, V. C.Ambivalent Resistance and Comparative Constitutionalism: Opening up the Conversation on “Proportionality,” Rights and Federalism’ (1999) 1 University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law583
    Jackson, V. C.Being Proportional About Proportionality’ (2004) 21 Constitutional Commentary803
    Jacobs, F. G. ‘The “Limitation Clauses” of the European Convention on Human Rights’ in Mestral, A. L. C. and others (eds) The Limitation of Human Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law (Cowansville, Quebec: Yvon Blais, 1986)
    Jacobsohn, G. J.An unconstitutional constitution? A comparative perspective’ (2006) 4 International Journal of Constitutional Law460
    Jowell, J. and Cooper, J. (eds). Understanding Human Rights Principles (Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2001)
    Kavanagh, A.Original Intention, Enacted Text, and Constitutional Interpretation’ (2002) 47 American Journal of Jurisprudence255
    Kavanagh, A.The Idea of a Living Constitution’ (2003) 16 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence55
    Kavanagh, A.Constitutional Review under the UK Human Rights Act (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009)
    Kommers, D. P.The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany (2nd edn, London: Duke University Press, 1997)
    Kumm, M. ‘Political Liberalism and the Structure of Rights: On the Place and Limits of the Proportionality Requirement’ in Pavlakos, G. (ed) Law, Rights and Discourse: The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007)
    Kumm, M.Who is Afraid of the Total Constitution? Constitutional Rights as Principles and the Constitutionalization of Private Law’ (2006) 7 German Law Journal341
    Kymlicka, W.Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995)
    Letsas, G.A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007)
    Loughlin, M. and Walker, N. (eds). The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007)
    Lukes, S.‘Comparing the Incomparable: Trade-offs and Sacrifices’ in Chang, R. (ed) Incommensurability, Incompatibility, and Practical Reason (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1997)
    Macedo, S. ‘In Defence of Liberal Public Reason: Are Slavery and Abortion Hard Cases?’ in George, R. P., and Wolfe, C.(eds) Natural Law and Public Reason (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2000)
    Marmor, A. ‘Should we Value Legislative Integrity?’ in Bauman, R. W. and Kahana, T. (eds) The Least Examined Branch: The Role of Legislatures in the Constitutional State (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006)
    Meiklejohn, A. ‘The First Amendment is an Absolute’ [1961] Supreme Court Review 245
    Meyerson, D.Rights Limited: Freedom of Expression, Religion, and the South African Constitution (Kenwyn: Juta, 1997)
    Michelman, F. I.Human Rights and the Limits of Constitutional Theory’ (2000) 13 Ratio Juris63
    Miller, B. W. ‘Justification and Rights Limitation’ in Huscroft, G. (ed) Expounding the Constitution: Essays in Constitutional Theory (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008)
    Nozick, R.Anarchy, State and Utopia (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1974)
    Oberdiek, J.Lost in Moral Space: On the Infringing/Violating Distinction and its Place in the Theory of Rights’ (2004) 23 Law and Philosophy325
    Oberdiek, J.Specifying Rights Out of Necessity’ (2008) 28 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies127
    Oberdiek, J.What's Wrong with Infringements (Insofar as Infringements are Not Wrong): A Reply’ (2008) 27 Law and Philosophy293
    Porat, I.The Dual Model of Balancing: A Model for the Proper Scope of Balancing in Constitutional Law’ (2006) 27 Cardozo Law Review1393
    Posner, R. A.Review Article: Constitutional Law From a Pragmatic Perspective’ (2005) 55 University of Toronto Law Journal299
    Rawls, J.Reply to Habermas’ (1995) 92 Journal of Philosophy132
    Rawls, J.A Theory of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971)
    Rawls, J.Political Liberalism (expanded edn., New York: Columbia University Press, 2005)
    Raz, J. ‘On the Authority and Interpretation of Constitutions: Some Preliminaries’ in Alexander, L (ed) Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998)
    Raz, J.Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics (New York: Clarendon Press, 1994)
    Raz, J.Practical Reason and Norms (new edn, New York: Oxford University Press, 2002)
    Raz, J.The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality (New York: Clarendon Press, 1979)
    Raz, J.The Morality of Freedom (New York: Clarendon Press, 1988)
    Reich, C. A.Mr Justice Black and the Living Constitution’ (1963) 76 Harvard Law Review673
    Rivers, J.Proportionality and Variable Intensity of Review’ (2006) 65 Cambridge Law Journal174
    Rubenfeld, J.Freedom and Time: A Theory of Constitutional Self-Government (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001)
    Sadurski, W.Rights Before Courts: A Study of Constitutional Courts in Postcommunist States of Central and Eastern Europe (Dordrecht: Springer, 2005)
    Sajó, A.Limiting Government: An Introduction to Constitutionalism (Budapest: Central European University Press, 1999)
    Schauer, F. ‘Freedom of Expression Adjudication in Europe and the United States: A Case Study in Comparative Constitutional Architecture’ in Nolte, G. (ed) European and US Constitutionalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)
    Schauer, F.Speech and “Speech”––Obscenity and “Obscenity”: An Exercise in the Interpretation of Constitutional Language’ (1979) 67 Georgetown Law Journal899
    Schmitt, C.Legality and Legitimacy (Durham: Duke University Press, 2004)
    Schmitt, C.Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty (Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press, 1985)
    Schmitt, C.The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy (Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press, 1988)
    Shafer-Landau, R.Specifying Absolute Rights’ (1995) 37 Arizona Law Review209
    Smith, S. D. ‘What Does Constitutional Interpretation Interpret?’ in Huscroft, G. (ed) Expounding the Constitution: Essays in Constitutional Theory (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008)
    Solum, L. B.Constructing an Ideal of Public Reason’ (1993) 30 San Diego Law Review729
    Solum, L. B.On the Indeterminacy Crisis: Critiquing Critical Dogma’ (1987) 54 University of Chicago Law Review462
    Sottiaux, S.Terrorism and the Limitation of Rights: The ECHR and the US Constitution (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008)
    Sunstein, C. R. ‘Incommensurability and Kinds of Valuation: Some Applications in Law’ in Chang, R. (ed) Incommensurability, Incompatibility, and Practical Reason (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1997)
    Sunstein, C. R.Incompletely Theorized Agreements’ (1995) 108 Harvard Law Review1733
    Sunstein, C. R.Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996)
    Sweet, A. S. and Mathews, J.. ‘Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism’ (2008) 47 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law27
    Thayer, J. B.The Origin and Scope of the American Doctrine of Constitutional Law’ (1893) 7 Harvard Law Review129
    Thayer, JB.John Marshall (Boston: Houghton, Mifflin, 1901)
    Thomson, J. J. ‘Some Ruminations on Rights’ in Parent, W (ed) Rights, Restitution, and Risk (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1986)
    Thomson, JJ.The Realm of Rights (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1990)
    Tully, J. ‘Introduction’ in Gagnon, A.-G. and Tully, J. (eds) Multinational Democracies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001)
    Tully, J.The agonic freedom of citizens’ (1999) 28 Economy and Society161
    Tully, J.The Unfreedom of the Moderns in Comparison to Their Ideals of Constitutional Democracy’ (2002) 65 Modern Law Review204
    Tully, J.Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995)
    Tully, J.The Unattained Yet Attainable Democracy: Canada and Quebec Face the New Century (The Desjardins Lecture, McGill University, 23 March 2000)
    Waldron, J.A Right-Based Critique of Constitutional Rights’ (1993) 13 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies18
    Waldron, J. ‘Do Judges Reason Morally?’ in Huscroft, G. (ed) Expounding the Constitution: Essays in Constitutional Theory (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008)
    Waldron, J. ‘Introduction’ in Waldron, J. (ed) Theories of Rights (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989)
    Waldron, J. ‘Principles of Legislation’ in Bauman, R. W. and Kahana, T. (eds). The Least Examined Branch: The Role of Legislatures in the Constitutional State (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006)
    Waldron, J.Religious Contributions in Public Deliberation’ (1993) 30 San Diego Law Review817
    Waldron, J.The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review’ (2006) 115 Yale Law Journal1346
    Waldron, J.Law and Disagreement (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999)
    Waldron, J.Liberal Rights: Collected Papers 1981–1991 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993)
    Waldron, J.The Dignity of Legislation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)
    Waluchow, W. J.A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review: The Living Tree (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007)
    Walzer, M.Spheres of Justice: A Defence of Pluralism and Equality (New York: Basic Books, 1983)
    Whittington, K. E.The New Originalism’ (2004) 2 Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy599
    Whittington, K. E.Constitutional Construction: Divided Powers and Constitutional Meaning (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2001)
    Whittington, K. E.Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review (Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas, 1999
    Wiggins, D. ‘Incommensurability: Four Proposals’ in Chang, R. (ed) Incommensurability, Incompatibility, and Practical Reason (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1997)
    Wittgenstein, L.Anscombe, G. E. M. and Wright, G. H. (eds). Zettel (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1967)
    Woolman, S. ‘Limitation’ in Chaskalson, M. et al (eds) Constitutional Law of South Africa (1st edn, Cape Town: Juta, 1996)
    Yowell, P.A Critical Examination of Dworkin's Theory of Rights’ (2007) 52 American Journal of Jurisprudence93

    Metrics

    Altmetric attention score

    Full text views

    Total number of HTML views: 0
    Total number of PDF views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    Book summary page views

    Total views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    * Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

    Usage data cannot currently be displayed.

    Accessibility standard: Unknown

    Why this information is here

    This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

    Accessibility Information

    Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.