References
Barwise, J. and Cooper, R. (1981). Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1:413–458.
Beck, J. (2019). Perception is analog: The argument from weber’s law. The Journal of Philosophy, 116(6):319–349.
Benacerraf, P. (1965). What numbers could not be. The Philosophical Review, 74(1):47–73.
Benacerraf, P. (1973). Mathematical truth. Journal of Philosophy, 70(19):661–679.
Bermúdez, J. and Cahen, A. (2020). Nonconceptual mental content. In Zalta, E. N., editor, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Summer 2020 edition.
Bloom, P. and Wynn, K. (1997). Linguistic cues in the acquisition of number words. Journal of Child language, 24(3):511–533.
Burge, T. (2010). Origins of Objectivity. Oxford University Press.
Butterworth, B. (2005). The development of arithmetical abilities. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(1):3–18.
Carey, S. (2000). The origin of concepts. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1(1):37–41.
Carey, S. (2009a). The Origin of Concepts. Oxford University Press.
Carey, S. (2009b). Where our number concepts come from. The Journal of Philosophy, 106(4):220–254.
Carey, S. (2011). Précis of the origin of concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(3):113–124.
Carey, S. and Barner, D. (2019). Ontogenetic origins of human integer representations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(10):823–835.
Cheung, P., Rubenson, M., and Barner, D. (2017). To infinity and beyond: Children generalize the successor function to all possible numbers years after learning to count. Cognitive Psychology, 92:22–36.
Chierchia, G. (1998a). Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of “semantic parameter.” In Rothstein, S., ed., Events and Grammar. Springer.
Chierchia, G. (1998b). Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics, 6:339–405.
Chomsky, N. (1987). Language and Problems of Knowledge the Managua Lectures. MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (2014). The Minimalist Program. MIT press.
Clarke, S. and Beck, J. (2021). The number sense represents (rational) numbers. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 44:1–33.
Cole, J. (2013). Towards an institutional account of the objectivity, necessity, and atemporality of mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica, 21(1):9–36.
Cowie, F. (1998). What’s within? Nativism Reconsidered. Oxford University Press.
Davidson, K., Eng, K., and Barner, D. (2012). Does learning to count involve a semantic induction? Cognition, 123(1):162–173.
Davies, M. (2015). Knowledge–explicit, implicit and tacit: Philosophical aspects. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 13:74–90.
de Cruz, H. (2016). Numerical cognition and mathematical realism. Philosophers’ Imprint, 16:1–13.
Dehaene, S. (2011). The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. Oxford University Press.
Dummett, M. (1991a). Frege: Philosophy of Mathematics. Harvard University Press.
Dummett, M. (1991b). The Logical Basis of Metaphysics. Harvard University Press.
Egan, F. (2012). Representationalism. In Margolis, E., Samuels, R., and Stich, S., editors, The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Cognitive Science, pages 249–272. Oxford University Press.
Field, H. (1989). Fictionalism, epistemology, and modality. Realism, Mathematics and Modality, pages 1–52. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Fodor, J. A. (1975). The Language of Thought, volume 5. Harvard University Press.
Fodor, J. A. (1981). The present status of the innateness controversy. In Fodor, J., editor, RePresentations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science, pages 257–316. MIT Press.
Fodor, J. A. (1990). A theory of content i. In Fodor, J. A., editor, A Theory of Content. MIT Press.
Fodor, J. A. (1992). A theory of the child’s theory of mind. Cognition, 44:283–296.
Fodor, J. A. (1998). Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford University Press.
Frege, G. (1884). Grundlagen der Arithmetik. Wilhelm Koebner.
Frege, G. (1903). Grundgesetze der Arithmetik II. Olms.
Fuson, K. C. (2012). Children’s Counting and Concepts of Number. Springer Science & Business Media.
Gallistel, C., Gelman, R., and Cordes, S. (2006). The cultural and evolutionary history of the real numbers. In Levinson, S. C. & Jaisson, P. editor, Evolution and Culture, page 247. MIT Press.
Gallistel, C. R. (2021). The approximate number system represents magnitude and precision. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 44:e187–e187.
Gallistel, C. R. and Gelman, R. (1992). Preverbal and verbal counting and computation. Cognition, 44(1–2):43–74.
Gallistel, C. R. and Gelman, R. (2000). Non-verbal numerical cognition: From reals to integers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(2):59–65.
Geach, P. T. (1972). Logic Matters. University of California Press.
Gelman, R. and Gallistel, C. R. (1986). The Child’s Understanding of Number. Harvard University Press.
Gelman, S. A., Leslie, S.-J., Gelman, R., and Leslie, A. (2019). Do children recall numbers as generic? A strong test of the generics-as-default hypothesis. Language Learning and Development, 15(3):217–231.
Goodman, N. and Quine, W. V. O. (1947). Steps toward a constructive nominalism. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 12(4):105–122.
Grinstead, J., MacSwan, J., Curtiss, S., and Gelman, R. (1997). The independence of language and number. In Twenty-Second Boston University Conference on Language Development.
Hale, B. and Wright, C. (2001). The Reason’s Proper Study: Towards a Neo-Fregean Philosophy of Mathematics. Oxford University Press.
Harnish, R. M. (2000). Minds, Brains, Computers: An Historical Introduction to the Foundations of Cognitive Science. Wiley-Blackwell.
Hart, W. (1991). Benacerraf’s dilemma. Crítica: Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía, 23(68):87–103.
Horn, L. (1972). On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators. PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.
Hurford, J. R. (1987). Language and Number: The Emergence of a Cognitive System. Basil Blackwell Oxford.
Hyde, D. C., Simon, C. E., Berteletti, I., and Mou, Y. (2017). The relationship between non-verbal systems of number and counting development: A neural signatures approach. Developmental Science, 20(6):e12464.
Kadosh, R. C. and Dowker, A. (2015). The Oxford Handbook of Numerical Cognition. Oxford Library of Psychology.
Kennedy, C. and Syrett, K. (2022). Numerals denote degree quantifiers: Evidence from child language. In Measurements, Numerals and Scales: Essays in Honour of Stephanie Solt, pages 135–162. Springer.
Kim, J. (1981). The role of perception in a priori knowledge: Some remarks. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 40(3):339–354.
Kratzer, A. and Heim, I. (1998). Semantics in Generative Grammar, volume 1185. Blackwell Oxford.
Landman, F. (1989). Groups, i. Linguistics and Philosophy, 12(5):559–605.
Laurence, S. and Margolis, E. (2005). Number and natural. The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents, 1:216.
Laurence, S. and Margolis, E. (2007). Linguistic determinism and the innate basis of number. In The Innate Mind, pages 139–169.
Le Corre, M. and Carey, S. (2007). One, two, three, four, nothing more: An investigation of the conceptual sources of the verbal counting principles. Cognition, 105(2):395–438.
Lee, A. Y., Myers, J., and Rabin, G. O. (2022). The structure of analog representation. Noûs, 57(1):209–237.
Leslie, A. M., Gelman, R., and Gallistel, C. (2008). The generative basis of natural number concepts. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(6):213–218.
Leslie, A. M., Xu, F., Tremoulet, P. D., and Scholl, B. J. (1998). Indexing and the object concept: Developing “what” and “where” systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(1):10–18.
Link, G. (1983). The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice-theoretic approach. In Bäuerle, R., Schwarze, C., and von Stechow, A., editors, Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, pages 303–323. de Gruyter.
Linnebo, Ø. (2009). The individuation of the natural numbers. In Bueno, O. and Linnebo, Ø. , editors, New Waves in Philosophy of Mathematics, pages 220–238. Palgrave-MacMillan.
Linnebo, Ø. (2017). Philosophy of Mathematics. Princeton University Press.
Linnebo, Ø. and Shapiro, S. (2017). Actual and potential infinity. Noûs, 53(1):160–191.
Macnamara, J. T. (1986). A border dispute: the place of logic in psychology. MIT Press.
Maddy, P. (1990). Realism in Mathematics. Oxford University Press.
Maddy, P. (2018). Psychology and the a priori sciences. In Bangu, S., editor, Naturalizing Logico-Mathematical Knowledge, pages 15–29. Routledge.
Margolis, E. (2020). The small number system. Philosophy of Science, 87(1):113–134.
Margolis, E. and Laurence, S. (2008). How to learn the natural numbers: Inductive inference and the acquisition of number concepts. Cognition, 106(2):924–939.
Margolis, E. and Laurence, S. (2013). In defense of nativism. Philosophical Studies, 165(2):693–718.
Margolis, E. and Laurence, S. (2022). Concepts. In Zalta, E. N. and Nodelman, U., editors, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Fall 2022 edition.
Margolis, E. E. and Laurence, S. E. (1999). Concepts: Core Readings. The MIT Press.
McMurray, B. (2007). Defusing the childhood vocabulary explosion. Science, 317(5838):631–631.
McNally, L., de Swart, H., Aloni, M. et al. (2011). Inflection and derivation: How adjectives and nouns refer to abstract objects. In Proceedings of the 18th Amsterdam Colloquium, pages 425–434. ILLC.
Meck, W. H. and Church, R. M. (1983). A mode control model of counting and timing processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 9(3):320–356.
Mix, K. S. and Sandhofer, C. M. (2007). Do we need a number sense? In Roberts, M. J., editor, Integrating the Mind: Domain General vs Domain Specific Processes in Higher Cognition, pages 293–326. Psychology Press.
Moltmann, F. (2013). Reference to numbers in natural language. Philosophical Studies, 162:499–536.
O’Shaughnessy, D. M., Gibson, E., and Piantadosi, S. T. (2021). The cultural origins of symbolic number. Psychological Review, 129 (6):1442.
Partee, B. (1986). Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In Groenendijk, J., de Jongh, D., and Stokhof, M., editors, Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers. Foris. pages 115–143.
Piaget, J. and Chomsky, N. (1980). Opening the debate: The psychogenesis of knowledge and its epistemological significance. In Piattelli-Palmarini, M., editor, Language and learning: The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky, pages 23–34. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Pinker, S. (2007). The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature. Penguin.
Ramsey, W. (2022). Implicit mental representation. In Bangu, S., (editor), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy and Implicit Cognition. Routledge.
Ramsey, W. M. (2007). Representation Reconsidered. Cambridge University Press.
Resnik, M. (1997). Mathematics as a Science of Patterns. Oxford University Press.
Rips, L. J., Bloomfield, A., and Asmuth, J. (2008). From numerical concepts to concepts of number. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(6):623–642.
Russell, B. (1919). Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy. Dover.
Sanford, E. M. and Halberda, J. (2023). Successful discrimination of tiny numerical differences. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 9(1):196–205.
Sarnecka, B. W. and Carey, S. (2008). How counting represents number: What children must learn and when they learn it. Cognition, 108(3):662–674.
Schlimm, D. (2018). Numbers through numerals: The constitutive role of external representations. In Naturalizing Logico-Mathematical Knowledge, pages 195–217. Routledge.
Scholl, B. J. and Leslie, A. M. (1999). Explaining the infant’s object concept: Beyond the perception/cognition dichotomy. In Lepore, E., and Pylyshyn, Z., (editors), What Is Cognitive Science, pages 26–73. Blackwell.
Scontras, G. (2014). The Semantics of Measurement. PhD thesis, Harvard University.
Searle, J. R. (1982). The Chinese room revisited. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5(2):345–348.
Shapiro, S. (1997). Philosophy of Mathematics: Structure and Ontology. Oxford University Press.
Shapiro, S. (2000). Thinking about Mathematics: The Philosophy of Mathematics. Oxford University Press.
Shea, N. (2018). Representation in Cognitive Science. Oxford University Press.
Simon, T. J. (1997). Reconceptualizing the origins of number knowledge: A “non-numerical” account. Cognitive Development, 12(3):349–372.
Snyder, E. (2017). Numbers and cardinalities: What’s really wrong with the easy argument? Linguistics and Philosophy, 40:373–400.
Snyder, E. (2021a). Counting, measuring, and the fractional cardinalities puzzle. Linguistics and Philosophy, 44(3):513–550.
Snyder, E. (2021b). Semantics and the Ontology of Number. Cambridge University Press.
Snyder, E., Samuels, R., and Shapiro, S. (2018a). Neologicism, Frege’s constraint, and the Frege-heck condition. Noûs, 54(1):54–77.
Snyder, E., Samuels, R., and Shapiro, S. (2022). Resolving Frege’s other puzzle. Philosophia Mathematica, 30(1):59–87.
Snyder, E., Samuels, R., and Shaprio, S. (2019). Hale’s argument from transitive counting. Synthese, 198(3):1905–1933.
Snyder, E. and Shapiro, S. (2022). Groups, sets, and paradox. Linguistics and Philosophy, 45(6):1277–1313.
Snyder, E., Shapiro, S., and Samuels, R. (2018b). Cardinals, ordinals, and the prospects for a Fregean foundation. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 82:77–107.
Spelke, E. S. (2000). Core knowledge. American Psychologist, 55(11):1233–1250.
Spelke, E. S. (2003). What makes us smart? Core knowledgeand natural language. In Gentner, D., and Goldin-Meadow, S., editors, Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought, pages 277–311. MIT Press.
Spelke, E. S. (2017). Core knowledge, language, and number. Language Learning and Development, 13(2):147–170.
Spelke, E. S. (2022). What Babies Know: Core Knowledge and Composition. Volume 1. Oxford University Press.
Strawson, P. F. (2002). Individuals. Routledge.
Tennant, N. (1997). The Taming of the True. Oxford University Press.
vanMarle, K. (2018). What happens when a child learns to count? The development of the number concept. In Bangu, S., editor, Naturalizing Logico-Mathematical Knowledge: Approaches from Philosophy, Psychology and Cognitive Science, pages 131–147. Routledge.
Weir, A. (2022). Formalism in the philosophy of Mathematics. In Zalta, E. N., editor, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
Wright, C. (2000). Neo-Fregean foundations for real analysis: Some reflections on Frege’s constraint. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 41:317–334.
Wynn, K. (1992). Children’s acquisition of the number words and the counting system. Cognitive Psychology, 24(2):220–251.
Wynn, K. (2018). Origins of numerical knowledge. In Bangu, S., editor, Naturalizing Logico-Mathematical Knowledge, pages 106–130. Routledge.
Yi, B.-u. (2018). Numerical cognition and mathematical knowledge: The plural property view. In Bangu, S., editor, Naturalizing Logico-Mathematical Knowledge, pages 52–88. Routledge.
