Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Output-Driven Phonology
  • Cited by 8
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
December 2013
Print publication year:
2013
Online ISBN:
9780511740039
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511740039
Subjects:
Phonetics and Phonology, Psycholinguistics and Neurolinguistics, English Language and Linguistics: General Interest, Language and Linguistics
Series:
Cambridge Studies in Linguistics (139)
Information

Book description

This book presents the theory of output-driven maps and provides a fresh perspective on the extent to which phonologies can be characterized in terms of restrictions on outputs. Closely related to traditional conceptions of process opacity, but differing in notable ways, the theory of output-driven maps applies equally to SPE-style ordered rules, Optimality Theory, and other phonological theories. It permits a formally rigorous analysis of the issues in Optimality Theory that is not possible with traditional process opacity. Also presented is a theory of phonological learning. Building on prior work on learning in Optimality Theory, the learning theory exploits the formal structure of output-driven maps to achieve learning that is far more computationally efficient than comparable prior approaches. In this book Bruce Tesar, one of the founders of the study of learnability in Optimality Theory, presents fresh perspectives in an accessible way for graduate students and academic researchers.

Reviews

‘Output-Driven Phonology: Theory and Learning opens a new perspective on phonological systems: how such systems are formally organized, and immediately related to this, how they are acquired. Bruce Tesar has taken a major step towards solving the classical problem of simultaneously learning a grammar and a lexicon.’

René Kager - Utrecht University

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

Contents

Contents
References

References

Akers, C. 2012. Simultaneous learning of hidden structures by the commitment-based learner. Ph.D. dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick.
Albright, A. 2002. The identification of bases in morphological paradigms. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.
Alderete, J. 1999a. Morphologically governed accent in Optimality Theory. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Alderete, John. 1999b. Head dependence in stress-epenthesis interaction. In The Derivational Residue in Phonological Optimality Theory, ed. B. Hermans and M. van Oostendorp, 29–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ROA-453.
Ambrazas, V., ed. 1997. Lithuanian Grammar. Vilnius Baltos: Lankos.
Anderson, J. M., and Ewen, C. J. 1987. Principles of Dependency Phonology. Cambridge University Press.
Anderson, S. R., and Browne, W. 1973. On keeping exchange rules in Czech. Papers in Linguistics 6, 4: 445–482.
Angluin, D. 1980. Inductive inference of formal languages from positive data. Information and Control 45: 117–135.
Anttila, A. 1997. Variation in Finnish phonology and morphology. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.
Anttila, A., and Cho, Y. Y. 1998. Variation and change in Optimality Theory. Lingua 104: 31–56.
Apoussidou, D. 2007. The learnability of metrical phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Apoussidou, D., and Boersma, P. 2003. The learnability of Latin stress. Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences 25: 101–148. ROA-643.
Archangeli, D. 1984. Underspecification in Yawelmani phonology and morphology. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Archangeli, Diana. 1988. Aspects of underspecification theory. Phonology 5: 183–207.
Archangeli, D., Moll, L., and Ohno, K. 1998. Why not *NC. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, Part 1: Main Session, ed. M. C. Guber, D. Higgins, K. S. Olson, and T. Wysocki, 1–26. Chicago: CLS.
Baker, C. L. 1979. Syntactic theory and the projection problem. Linguistic Inquiry 10: 533–581.
Baković, E. 2005. Antigemination, assimilation and the determination of identity. Phonology 22: 279–315.
Baković, Eric. 2007. A revised typology of opaque generalizations. Phonology 24: 217–259. ROA-850.
Balari, S., Marín, R., and Vallverdú, T. 2000. Implicational constraints, defaults, and markedness. GGT Report de Recerca GGT-00–8, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona. ROA-396.
Becker, M. 2008. Phonological trends in the lexicon: The role of Constraints. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. ROA-1008.
Beckman, J. N. 1999. Positional Faithfulness: An Optimality Theoretic Treatment of Phonological Asymmetries. Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics. New York: Garland Publishing.
Benua, L. 1997. Transderivational identity: Phonological relations between words. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Bermudez-Otero, R. 2003. The acquisition of phonological opacity. In Variation within Optimality Theory: Proceedings of the Stockholm Workshop on “Variation within Optimality Theory”, ed. J. Spenader, A. Eriksson, and O. Dahl, 25–36. Stockholm: Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University. ROA-593 (expanded version).
Bernhardt, B., and Stemberger, J. 1998. Handbook of Phonological Development: From the Perspective of Constraint-based Nonlinear Phonology: San Diego: Academic Press.
Boersma, P. 1998. Functional Phonology. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
Boersma, Paul. 2001. Phonology-semantics interaction in OT, and its acquisition. In Papers in Experimental and Theoretical Linguistics, ed. Robert Kirchner, Wolf Wikeley and Joe Pater, 24–35. Edmonton: University of Alberta. ROA-369.
Boersma, Paul. 2009. Some correct error-driven versions of the constraint demotion algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 667–686.
Boersma, P., and Hayes, B. 2001. Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 45–86.
Brasoveanu, A., and Prince, A. 2011. Ranking and necessity: The Fusional Reduction Algorithm. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29: 3–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11049-010-9103-3.
Broihier, K. 1995. Optimality Theoretic rankings with tied constraints: Slavic relatives, resumptive pronouns and learnability. Ms., Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Brown, R., and Hanlon, C. 1970. Derivational complexity and order of acquisition in child speech. In Cognition and the Development of Language, ed. J. R. Hayes, 11–53. New York: Wiley.
Bybee, J. L. 1985. Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bybee, Joan L. 1998. Usage-based phonology. In Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, ed. M. Darnell, 211–243. Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Bybee, Joan L. 2001. Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge University Press.
Camilli, A. 1929. Il dialetto di Servigliano, (Ascoli Piceno). Archivum Romanicum 13: 220–271.
Cherry, C. E., Halle, M., and Jakobson, R. 1953. Toward the logical description of languages in their phonemic aspect. Language 29: 34–46.
Chomsky, N. 1959. On certain formal properties of grammars. Information and Control 2: 137–167.
Chomsky, Noam. 1964. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. The Hague: Mouton.
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of Language. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Chomsky, N., and Halle, M. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York City: Harper & Row.
Clements, G. N. 1985. The geometry of phonological features. Phonology 2: 225–252.
Crowhurst, M., and Hewitt, M. 1997. Boolean Operations and Constraint Interactions in Optimality Theory. Ms., University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and Brandeis University, Waltham, MA. ROA-229.
Dambriunas, L., Klimas, A., and Schmalstieg, W. 1966. Introduction to Modern Lithuanian. Brooklyn: Franciscan Fathers Press.
De Lacy, P. 2002. The formal expression of markedness. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. ROA-542.
Demuth, K. 1995. Markedness and the development of prosodic structure. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society 25, ed. J. Beckman, 13–25. Amherst, MA: GLSA, University of Massachusetts. ROA-50.
Dresher, B. E. 1999. Charting the learning path: Cues to parameter setting. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 27–67.
Dresher, B. Elan. 2009. The Contrastive Hierarchy in Phonology. Cambridge University Press.
Dresher, B. E., and Kaye, J. 1990. A computational learning model for metrical phonology. Cognition 34: 137–195.
Eisner, J. 2000. Easy and hard constraint ranking in Optimality Theory: Algorithms and complexity. In Finite-State Phonology: Proceedings of the 5th Workshop of the ACL Special Interest Group in Computational Phonology, ed. J. Eisner, L. Karttunen, and A. Theriault, 22–33.
Ernestus, M., and Baayen, H. 2003. Predicting the unpredictable: Interpreting neutralized segments in Dutch. Language 79: 5–38.
Fisher, R. A. 1922. On the mathematical foundations of theoretical statistics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A 222: 309–368.
Flora, J. 1974. Palauan phonology and morphology. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
Gnanadesikan, A. 1997. Phonology with ternary scales. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. ROA-195.
Gnanadesikan, Amalia. 2004. Markedness and faithfulness constraints in child phonology. In Constraints in Phonological Acquisition, ed. R. Kager, J. Pater, and W. Zonneveld, 73–108. Cambridge University Press.
Gold, E. M. 1967. Language identification in the limit. Information and Control 10: 447–474.
Goldsmith, J. 1976. Autosegmental phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Hale, K. 1973. Deep-surface canonical disparities in relation to analysis and change: An Australian example. Current Trends in Linguistics 11: 401–458.
Hale, M., and Reiss, C. 1997. Grammar optimization: The simultaneous acquisition of constraint ranking and a lexicon. Ms., Concordia University, Montreal. ROA-231.
Hale, Mark, and Reiss, Charles. 2008. The Phonological Enterprise. Oxford University Press.
Halle, M. 1959. The Sound Pattern of Russian: A Linguistic and Acoustical Investigation. The Hague: Mouton.
Hayes, B. 2004. Phonological acquisition in Optimality Theory: The early stages. In Constraints in Phonological Acquisition, ed. R. Kager, J. Pater, and W. Zonneveld, 158–203. Cambridge University Press.
Hewitt, M. S., and Crowhurst, M. J. 1996. Conjunctive constraints and templates in Optimality Theory. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 26, ed. K. Kusumoto, 101–116. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Idsardi, W. J. 2000. Clarifying opacity. The Linguistic Review 17: 337–350.
Inkelas, S. 1994. The consequences of Optimization for Underspecification. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Conference of the North East Linguistics Society, ed. J. Beckman, 287–302. Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistics Student Association.
Itô, J., and Mester, A. 1997. Sympathy Theory and German truncations. In University of Maryland Work Papers in Linguistics 5: Selected Phonology Papers from the Hopkins Optimality Theory Workshop 1997 / University of Maryland Mayfest 1997, ed. V. Miglio and B. Moren, 117–139. ROA-211.
Itô, Junko, and Mester, Armin. 1999. The structure of the phonological lexicon. In The Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, ed. N. Tsujimura, 62–100. Malden, MA, and Oxford: Blackwell.
Itô, Junko, and Mester, Armin. 2001. Structure preservation and stratal opacity in German. In Segmental Phonology in Optimality Theory: Constraints and Representations, ed. L. Lombardi, 261–295. Cambridge University Press.
Itô, Junko, and Mester, Armin. 2003. On the sources of opacity in OT: Coda processes in German. In The Syllable in Optimality Theory, ed. C. Féry and R. van de Vijver, 271–303. Cambridge University Press.
Itô, J., Mester, A., and Padgett, J. 1995. Licensing and underspecification in Optimality Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 571–614.
Jakobson, R., and Halle, M. 1956. Fundamentals of Language. The Hague: Mouton.
Jakobson, R., Fant, G., and Halle, M. 1952/1963. Preliminaries to Speech Analysis: The Distinctive Features and Their Correlates. Cambridge, MA: Tech. Rep. 13, MIT Acoustics Laboratory, 1952. MIT Press, 1963.
Jarosz, G. 2006. Rich lexicons and restrictive grammars – maximum likelihood learning in Optimality Theory. Ph.D. dissertation, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. ROA-884.
Jarosz, Gaja. 2009. Restrictiveness in phonological grammar and lexicon learning. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society.
Kager, R. 1999. Optimality Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Kaye, J., Lowenstamm, J., and Vergnaud, J.-R. 1985. The internal structure of phonological elements: A theory of charm and government. Phonology Yearbook 2: 305–328.
Kenstowicz, M. 1972. Lithuanian phonology. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 2: 1–85.
Kenstowicz, Michael. 1996. Base-identity and uniform exponence: Alternatives to cyclicity. In Current Trends in Phonology: Models and Methods, ed. J. Durand and B. Laks, 363–393: University of Salford Publications.
Kenstowicz, M., and Kisseberth, C. 1971. Unmarked bleeding orders. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 1: 8–28.
Kenstowicz, Michael, and Kisseberth, Charles. 1979. Generative Phonology. San Diego: Academic Press.
Kerkhoff, A. 2007. Acquisition of morpho-phonology: The Dutch voicing alternation. Ph.D. dissertation, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics, Utrecht.
Kiparsky, P. 1971. Historical linguistics. In A Survey of Linguistic Science, ed. W. O. Dingwall, 576–649. College Park: University of Maryland Linguistics Program.
Kiparsky, Paul. 1973. Abstractness, opacity and global rules (Part 2 of “Phonological representations”). In Three Dimensions of Linguistic Theory, ed. O. Fujimura, 57–86. Tokyo: TEC.
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Lexical phonology and morphology. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, ed. I. S. Yang, 3–91. Seoul: Hanshin.
Kiparsky, Paul. 1985. Some consequences of lexical phonology. Phonology 2: 85–138.
Kiparsky, Paul. 2003. Syllables and moras in Arabic. In The Syllable in Optimality Theory, ed. C. Féry, and R. van de Vijver, 147–182: Cambridge University Press.
Kiparsky, Paul. forthcoming. Paradigm Effects and Opacity. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Kirchner, R. 1992. Lardil truncation and augmentation: A morphological account. Ms., University of Maryland, College Park.
Kirchner, Robert. 1995. Going the distance: Synchronic chain shifts in Optimality Theory. Ms., UCLA. ROA-66.
Kisseberth, C. 1970. On the functional unity of phonological rules. Linguistic Inquiry 1: 291–306.
Klokeid, T. J. 1976. Topics in Lardil grammar. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Kruskal, J. 1983. An overview of sequence comparison. In Time Warps, String Edits, and Macromolecules: The Theory and Practice of Sequence Comparison, ed. D. Sankoff and J. Kruskal, 1–44. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Levelt, C. 1995. Unfaithful kids: Place of articulation patterns in early child language. Talk, Cognitive Science Department, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Levenshtein, V. I. 1966. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Cybernetics and Control Theory 10: 707–710.
Liberman, M., and Prince, A. 1977. On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 249–336.
Lombardi, L. 2001. Why place and voice are different: Constraint-specific alternations in Optimality Theory. In Segmental Phonology in Optimality Theory: Constraints and Representations, ed. L. Lombardi, 13–45: Cambridge University Press.
Łubowicz, A. 2002. Derived environment effects in Optimality Theory. Lingua 112: 243–280. ROA-239.
Łubowicz, Anna. 2003. Contrast preservation in phonological mappings. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. ROA-554.
Magri, G. 2009. A theory of individual-level predicates based on blind mandatory implicatures: Constraint promotion for Optimality Theory. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Magri, Giorgio. 2012. Convergence of error-driven ranking algorithms. Phonology 29: 213–269.
Mathiassen, T. 1996. A Short Grammar of Lithuanian. Columbus: Slavica.
Mazereel, G. 1931. Klank-en Vormleer van het Brusselsch Dialect. Leuven: De Vlaamsche Drukkerij.
McCarthy, J. J. 1999. Sympathy and phonological opacity. Phonology 16: 331–399.
McCarthy, John J. 2006. Restraint of analysis. In Wondering at the Natural Fecundity of Things: Essays in Honor of Alan Prince, ed. E. Bakovic, J. Ito, and J. J. McCarthy. ROA-844.8.
McCarthy, John J. 2007a. Derivations and levels of representation. In The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, ed. P. de Lacy, 99–117. Cambridge University Press.
McCarthy, John J. 2007b. Hidden Generalizations: Phonological Opacity in Optimality Theory. Advances in Optimality Theory. Oakville, CT: Equinox.
McCarthy, J. J., and Prince, A. 1993a. Generalized alignment. In Yearbook of Morphology, ed. G. Booij and J. Van Marle, 79–154. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
McCarthy, John J., and Prince, Alan. 1993b. Prosodic morphology I: Constraint interaction and satisfaction. Ms., Linguistics Department, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and Linguistics Department, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
McCarthy, John J., and Prince, Alan. 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 18: Papers in Optimality Theory, ed. J. Beckman, L. Walsh Dickey, and S. Urbancyzk, 249–384. Amherst, MA: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.
McCarthy, John J., and Prince, Alan. 1999. Faithfulness and identity in prosodic morphology. In The Prosody–Morphology Interface, ed. R. Kager, H. van der Hulst, and W. Zonneveld, 218–309. New York City: Cambridge University Press. ROA-216.
McCawley, J. 1967. Sapir's phonological representation. International Journal of American Linguistics 33: 106–111.
Merchant, N. 2008. Discovering underlying forms: Contrast pairs and ranking. Ph.D. dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick. ROA-964.
Merchant, N., and Tesar, B. 2008. Learning underlying forms by searching restricted lexical subspaces. In Proceedings of the Forty-First Conference of the Chicago Linguistics Society (2005), vol. II: The Panels, 33–47. ROA-811.
Moreton, E. 2004. Non-computable functions in Optimality Theory. In Optimality Theory in Phonology: A Reader, ed. J. J. McCarthy, 141–163. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Odden, D. 2005. Introducing Phonology. Cambridge University Press.
Padgett, J. 1995. Partial class behavior and nasal place assimilation. In Proceedings of the Arizona Phonology Conference: Workshop on Features in Optimality Theory. Tucson, AZ: Coyote Working Papers, University of Arizona, Tucson.
Pater, J. 1999. Austronesian nasal substitution and other NC effects. In The Prosody–Morphology Interface, ed. R. Kager, H. van der Hulst, and W. Zonneveld, 310–343. Cambridge University Press.
Pater, Joe. 2010. Morpheme-specific phonology: Constraint indexation and inconsistency resolution. In Phonological Argumentation: Essays on Evidence and Motivation, ed. S. Parker, 123–154. London: Equinox.
Payne, D. L. 1981. The Phonology and Morphology of Axininca Campa. Austin, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
Prince, A. 1983. Relating to the grid. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 19–100.
Prince, Alan. 1990. Quantitative consequences of rhythmic organization. In CLS26-II: Papers from the Parasession on the Syllable in Phonetics and Phonology, ed. K. Deaton, M. Noske, and M. Ziolkowski, 355–398. Chicago Linguistics Society.
Prince, Alan. 2002. Entailed ranking arguments. Ms., Rutgers University, New Brunswick. ROA-500.
Prince, Alan. 2003. Arguing Optimality. In UMOP 26: Papers in Optimality Theory II, ed. A. Carpenter, A. Coetzee, and P. de Lacy, 269–304: GLSA. ROA-562.
Prince, Alan. 2006. Implication and impossibility in grammatical systems: What it is and how to find it. Ms., Linguistics Department, Rutgers University. ROA-880.
Prince, Alan. 2007. The pursuit of theory. In The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, ed. P. de Lacy, 33–60. New York City: Cambridge University Press.
Prince, A., and Smolensky, P. 1993/2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Prince, A., and Tesar, B. 2004. Learning phonotactic distributions. In Constraints in Phonological Acquisition, ed. R. Kager, J. Pater, and W. Zonneveld, 245–291. Cambridge University Press.
Pulleyblank, D., and Turkel, W. J. 1998. The logical problem of language acquisition in Optimality Theory. In Is the Best Good Enough? Optimality and Competition in Syntax, ed. P. Barbosa, D. Fox, P. Hagstrom, M. J. McGinnis, and D. Pesetsky, 399–420. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Reiss, C. 1996. Deriving an implicational universal in a constrained OT grammar. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 26, ed. K. Kusumoto, 303–317. Harvard University and MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Riggle, J. 2004. Contenders and learning. In The Proceedings of the 23rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. B. Schmeiser, V. Chand, A. Kelleher, and A. Rodriguez, 101–114. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. ROA-688.
Riggle, Jason. 2009. Generating contenders. Ms., University of Chicago. ROA-1044.
Ristad, E. S. 1990. The computational structure of human language. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Rosenblatt, F. 1958. The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychological Review 65: 386–408.
Rosenthall, S. 1994. Vowel/glide alternation in a theory of constraint interaction. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Rubach, J. 1984. Cyclic and Lexical Phonology: The Structure of Polish. Dordrecht: Foris.
Sagey, E. 1986. The representation of features and relations in nonlinear phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Samek-Lodovici, V., and Prince, A. 1999. Optima. Technical Report RuCCS-TR-57, Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ. ROA-363.
Sankoff, D., and Kruskal, J., eds. 1983. Time Warps, String Edits, and Macromolecules: The Theory and Practice of Sequence Comparison. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Sapir, D. J. 1965. A Grammar of Diola-Fogny. Cambridge University Press.
Schachter, P., and Fromkin, V. 1968. A Phonology of Akan: Akuapem, Asante, Fante. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 9. University of California.
Schane, S. 1974. How abstract is abstract? In Papers from the Parasession on Natural Phonology, ed. A. Bruck, R. Fox, and M. La Galy, 297–317. Chicago Linguistics Society.
Shaw, P. 1976. Theoretical issues in Dakota phonology and morphology. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto.
Shaw, Patricia. 1985. Modularism and substantive constraints in Dakota lexical phonology. Phonology Yearbook 2: 173–202.
Sherer, T. 1994. Prosodic phonotactics. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Smolensky, P. 1993. Harmony, markedness, and phonological activity. Handout, Rutgers Optimality Workshop-1. ROA-87.
Smolensky, Paul. 1995. On the internal structure of the constraint component Con of UG. Ms., The Johns Hopkins University. ROA-86.
Smolensky, Paul. 1996a. On the comprehension/production dilemma in child language. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 720–731.
Smolensky, Paul. 1996b. The initial state and “richness of the base” in Optimality Theory. Technical Report JHU-CogSci-96–4, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. ROA-154.
Steriade, D. 1987. On class nodes. Ms., MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Steriade, Donca. 1995. Underspecification and markedness. In The Handbook of Phonological Theory, ed. J. Goldsmith, 114–174. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Steriade, Donca. 2001. Directional asymmetries in place assimilation: A perceptual account. In The Role of Speech Perception in Phonology, ed. E. Hume and K. Johnson, 219–250. New York: Academic Press.
Szász, G. 1963. Introduction to Lattice Theory. New York: Academic Press.
Tesar, B. 1995. Computational Optimality Theory. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder.
Tesar, Bruce. 1997. Using the mutual inconsistency of structural descriptions to overcome ambiguity in language learning. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 28, ed. P. N. Tamanji and K. Kusumoto, 469–483. Amherst, MA: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.
Tesar, Bruce. 1998a. An iterative strategy for language learning. Lingua 104: 131–145.
Tesar, Bruce. 1998b. Error-driven learning in Optimality Theory via the efficient computation of optimal forms. In Is the Best Good Enough? Optimality and Competition in Syntax, ed. P. Barbosa, D. Fox, P. Hagstrom, M. J. McGinnis, and D. Pesetsky, 421–435. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tesar, Bruce. 2000. Using inconsistency detection to overcome structural ambiguity in language learning. Technical Report RuCCS-TR-58, Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ. ROA-426.
Tesar, Bruce. 2004. Using inconsistency detection to overcome structural ambiguity. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 219–253.
Tesar, Bruce. 2006a. Learning from paradigmatic information. In Proceedings of the Thirty-sixth Meeting of the North East Linguistics Society, ed. C. Davis, A. R. Deal, and Y. Zabbal, 619–638: GLSA. ROA-795.
Tesar, Bruce. 2006b. Faithful contrastive features in learning. Cognitive Science 30: 863–903.
Tesar, B., and Prince, A. 2007. Using phonotactics to learn phonological alternations. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Ninth Conference of the Chicago Linguistics Society (2003), vol. II: The Panels, ed. J. E. Cihlar, A. L. Franklin, D. W. Kaiser, and I. Kimbara, 209–237. ROA-620.
Tesar, B., and Smolensky, P. 1994. The learnability of Optimality Theory. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. R. Aranovich, W. Byrne, S. Preuss, and M. Senturia, 122–137. CSLI.
Tesar, Bruce, and Smolensky, Paul. 1998. Learnability in Optimality Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 229–268.
Tesar, Bruce, and Smolensky, Paul. 2000. Learnability in Optimality Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tesar, B., Alderete, J., Horwood, G., Merchant, N., Nishitani, Koichi, and Prince, Alan. 2003. Surgery in language learning. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. G. Garding and M. Tsujimura, 477–490. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. ROA-619.
Van der Hulst, H. 1995. Radical CV phonology: The categorial gesture. In Frontiers of Phonology, ed. J. Durand and F. Katamba, 80–116. Harlow, Essex: Longman.
Hulst, Harry van der. 1996. Radical CV phonology: The segment–syllable connection. In Current Trends in Phonology: Models and Methods, ed. J. Durand and B. Laks, 333–361. Salford: European Studies Research Institute (ESRI).
Van Loey, A. 1933. Historiese lange-vokalverschuivingen in het Brusselse dialekt. Bulletin van de koninklijke commissie voor toponymie en dialectologie 7: 308–328.
Van Oostendorp, M. 1995. Vowel quality and phonological projection. Ph.D. dissertation, Tilburg University. ROA-84.
Wexler, K., and Culicover, P. 1980. Formal Principles of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wilkinson, K. 1988. Prosodic structure and Lardil phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 325–334.
Wilson, C. 2001. Consonant cluster neutralization and targeted constraints. Phonology 18: 147–197.
Wolf, M. 2006. A note on the construction of complex OT constraints by material implication. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst. ROA-886.
Wolf, Matthew. 2007. What constraint connectives should be permitted in OT? In University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 36: Papers in Theoretical and Computational Phonology, ed. Michael Becker, 151–179. Amherst: GLSA.
Zoll, C. 1998. Parsing below the segment in a constraint-based framework. Dissertation in Linguistics. Stanford: CSLI.
Zonneveld, W. 1976. An exchange rule in Flemish Brussels Dutch. Linguistic Analysis 2: 109–114.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.