Adams, J. N. (1982) The Latin Sexual Vocabulary. London.
Adler, A. (ed.) (1928–38) Suidae Lexicon (5 vols). Leipzig.
Antolín, F. N. (ed.) (1995) Lygdamus: Corpus Tibullianum III. 1–6: Lygdami elegiarum liber. New York.
Arena, A. (1995) ‘Ovidio e l’ideologia augustea: I motivi delle Heroides e il loro significato’, Latomus 54: 822–41.
Armstrong, R. (2005) Ovid and his Love Poetry. London.
Arnott, W. G. (1996) Menander II. Cambridge, Mass.
Athanassaki, L. (1992) ‘The triumph of love and elegy in Ovid’s Amores 1, 2’, MD 28: 125–41.
Axelson, B. (1960) ‘Lygdamus und Ovid: Zur Methodik der literarischen Prioritätsbestimmung’, Eranos 58: 92–111.
Bablitz, L. (2008) ‘Judging Ovid’, CJ 104: 33–42.
Baca, A. R. (1971a) ‘The themes of querela and lacrimae in Ovid’s Heroides’, Emerita 39: 195–201.
Baca, A. R. (1971b) ‘Ovid’s epistle from Sappho to Phaon (Heroides 15)’, TAPhA 102: 29–38.
Baehrens, Ae. (1885) ‘De Epistula Sapphus Ouidiana ad Domenicum Comparetti Litterae’, RFIC 13: 49–67.
Balensiefen, L. (1994) ‘Überlegungen zu Aufbau und Lage der Danaidenhalle auf dem Palatin’, MDAI 102: 189–209.
Ball, R. J. (1994) ‘“Albi”, “ne doleas”: Horace and Tibullus’, CW 87: 409–14.
Barbu, N. (1887) De Sapphus Epistula. Berlin.
Barchiesi, A. (1986) ‘Problemi d’interpretazione in Ovidio: Continuità delle storie, continuazione dei testi’, MD 16: 77–107.
Barchiesi, A. (1987) ‘Narratività e convenzione nelle Heroides’, MD 19: 63–90.
Barchiesi, A. (1988) ‘Ovid the censor’, AJAH 13: 96–105.
Barchiesi, A. (1990) ‘Ovidio, Heroides 7, 115’, RFIC 3: 408–17.
Barchiesi, A. (ed.) (1992) P. Ouidii Nasonis: Epistulae Heroidum 1–3. Florence.
Barchiesi, A. (1993) ‘Future reflexive: Two modes of allusion and Ovid’s Heroides’, HSPh 95: 333–65.
Barchiesi, A. (1994) ‘Review of F. Spoth (1992)’, A&R 39: 111–2.
Barchiesi, A. (1997) ‘Elegia’, Enciclopedia oraziana, Istituto della enciclopedia italiana. Rome: 42–4.
Barchiesi, A. (1999) ‘Vers une histoire à rebours de l’élégie latine. Les Héroïdes “doubles” (16–21)’, in J. Fabre-Serris and A. Deremetz (eds) Élégie et épopée dans la poésie ovidienne: Héroïdes et Amours. Lille: 53–67.
Barchiesi, A. (2001a) ‘Allusion and society: Ovid the censor’, in Barchiesi (2001b) 155–61.
Barchiesi, A. (2001b) Speaking Volumes. London.
Barchiesi, A. (2006) ‘Women on top: Livia and Andromache’, in R. K. Gibson, S. Green and A. Sharrock (eds) The Art of Love:96–120.
Barchiesi, A. and Hardie, P. (2010) ‘The Ovidian career model: Ovid, Gallus, Apuleius, Boccaccio’, in P. Hardie and H. Moore (eds) Classical Literary Careers: 59–88.
Battistella, C. (2010) P. Ouidii Nasonis Heroidum Epistula 10: Ariadne Theseo: Introduzione, testo e commento. Berlin.
Beck, M. (1996) Die Epistulae Heroidum XVIII und XIXdes Corpus ouidianum. Padeborn.
Bessone, F. (1995) ‘Medea’s response to Catullus’, CQ 45: 575–8.
Bessone, F. (ed.) (1997) P. Ouidii Nasonis: Heroidum Epistula XII. Medea Iasoni. Florence.
Bessone, F. (2002–2003) ‘Conversione poetica e riconversione letteraria: l’epistola di Saffo nelle Heroides’, Incontri triestini di filologia classica 2: 115–43.
Bessone, F. (2003) ‘Saffo, la lirica, l’elegia: Su Ovidio, Heroides 15’, MD 51: 207–43.
Bessone, F. (2013) ‘Latin Precursors’, in T. S. Thorsen (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Latin Love Elegy: 39–56.
Birt, T. (1877) ‘Animaduersiones ad Ouidii Heroidum Epistulas’, RhM 32: 386–432.
Blänsdorf, J. (ed.) (1995) Fragmenta Poetarum Latinorum Epicorum et Lyricorum: Praeter Ennium et Lucilium. Stuttgart and Leipzig.
Bodenstein, R. (1882) Studien zu Ovids Heroides. Merseburg.
Bömer, F. (1957–8) P. Ouidius Naso: Die Fasten I: Kommentar. Heidelberg.
Bömer, F. (1980) P. Ouidius Naso: Metamorphosen X–XI, Kommentar. Heidelberg.
Bömer, F. (1982) P. Ouidius Naso: Metamorphosen XII–XIII, Kommentar. Heidelberg.
Booth, J. (ed.) (1991) Ovid: Amores II. Warminster.
Boyd, B. W. (1987) ‘The death of Corinna’s parrot reconsidered: Poetry and Ovid’s Amores’, CJ 82: 199–207.
Boyd, B. W. (1997) Ovid’s Literary Loves: Influence and Innovation in theAmores. Ann Arbor, Mich.
Brunelle, C. (2005) ‘Ovid’s satirical remedies’, in F. Ancona and E. Green (eds) Gendered Dynamics in Latin Love Poetry. Princeton: 141–58.
BurmanP. (1727) Publii Ouidii Nasonis Opera Omnia (4 vols). Amsterdam.
Burton, R. (1983) Classical Poets in the Florilegium Gallicum. Frankfurt am Main.
Cahoon, L. (1984) ‘The parrot and the poet: The function of Ovid’s funeral elegies’, CJ 80: 27–35.
Cahoon, L. (1991) ‘Psittacus redux: Boyd’s bird and mine (or, some thoughts on aims and methods in literary studies)’, CJ 86: 368–76.
Cairns, F. (1975) ‘Splendide mendax: Horace’s ‘Odes’ III.11’, G&R 22: 129–39.
Cairns, F. (1984) ‘Propertius and the battle of Actium’, in T. Woodman and D. West (eds) Poetry and Politics in the Age of Augustus. Cambridge: 129–68.
Cameron, A. (1968) ‘The first edition of Ovid’s Amores’, CQ 18: 320–33.
Cameron, A. (1995) Callimachus and His Critics. Princeton.
Campanelli, M. (2001) Polemiche e filologia ai primordi della stampa: Le Obseruationes diDomizio Calderini. Rome.
Campbell, D. A. (1978) ‘Aeolium carmen: Horace’s allusions to Sappho and Alcaeus’, EMC 22: 94–7.
Campbell, D. A. (1982) Greek Lyric I: Sappho and Alcaeus. Cambridge, Mass.
Casali, S. (1993) ‘Hydra redundans (Ovid, Heroides 9.95)’, CQ 43: 505–6.
Casali, S. (1995a) ‘Strategies of tension (Ovid, Heroides 4)’, PCPS 41: 1–15.
Casali, S. (1995b) ‘Tragic irony in Ovid, Heroides 9 and 11’, CQ 45: 505–11.
Casali, S. (ed.) (1995c) P. Ouidii Nasonis Heroidum Epistula IX: Deianira Herculi. Florence.
Casali, S. (1998) ‘Ovid’s Canace and Euripides’ Aeolus: Two notes on Heroides 11’, Mnemos. 6: 700–10.
Casali, S. (2004–5) ‘Further voices in Ovid Heroides 7’, Hermathena 177–8: 147–64.
Casali, S. (2006) ‘The art of making oneself hated: Rethinking (anti-)Augustanism in Ovid’s Ars Amatoria’, in R. K. Gibson, S. Green and A. Sharrock (eds) The Art of Love: 216–34.
Caston, R. R. (2012) The Elegiac Passion: Jealousy in Roman Love Elegy. Oxford.
Clausen, W. (ed.) (1994) Vergil: Eclogues. Oxford.
Comparetti, D. (1876) Sull’Autenticità dell’Epistola Ovidiana di Saffo a Faone. Florence.
Conte, G. B. (1986) The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Vergil and Other Latin Poets. Ithaca.
Conte, G. B. (1989) ‘Love without elegy: The Remedia amoris and the logic of a genre’, Poetics Today 10: 441–69.
Cornish, F. W, Postgate, J. P. and Mackail, J. W. (eds) (1962) Catullus, Tibullus, Peruigilium Veneris. G. P. Goold (rev.), 2nd edn. Cambridge, Mass.
Courtney, E. (1965) ‘Ovidian and non-Ovidian Heroides’, BICS 12: 63–6.
Courtney, E. (1997) ‘Echtheitskritik: Ovidian and non-Ovidian Heroides again’, CJ 93.2: 157–66.
Courtney, E. (ed.) (2003) The Fragmentary Latin Poets. Oxford.
Dangel, J. (2008) ‘Réécriture topique en réception polyphonique: Sappho lyrique revisitée par Ovide élégiaque (Héroïde XV)’, Latomus 67: 114–29.
Davis, G. (2005) ‘From lyric to elegy: The inscription of the elegiac subject in Heroides 15 (Sappho to Phaon)’, in W. Batstone and G. Tissol (eds) Defining Genre and Gender in Latin Literature. New York: 176–91.
Davis, P. J. (1995) ‘Rewriting Euripides: Ovid, Heroides 4’, Scholia 4: 41–55.
Davis, P. J. (2006) Ovid and Augustus: A Political Reading of Ovid’s Erotic Poems. London.
De Vries, S. G. (ed.) (1885) Epistula Sapphus ad Phaonem. Apparatu Critico Instructa Commentario Illustrata et Ouidio Vindicata. Leiden.
Deferrari, R. J., Barry, M. I. and McGuire, M. R. P. (1939) A Concordance of Ovid. Hildesheim.
Desmond, M. (1993) ‘When Dido reads Vergil: Gender and intertextuality in Ovid’s Heroides 7’, Helios 20: 56–68.
Di Benedetto (2004) ‘La nuova Saffo e dintorni’, ZPE 153: 7–20.
Dörrie, H. (1967) ‘Die dichterische Absicht Ovids in den Epistulae Heroidum’ A&A 13: 41–55.
Dörrie, H. (ed.) (1971) P. Ouidii Nasonis Epistulae Heroidum. Berlin.
Dörrie, H. (ed.) (1975) P. Ouidius Naso Der Brief der Sappho an Phaon, Zetemata 58. Munich.
Drinkwater, M. (2013) ‘Militia amoris: Fighting in love’s army’, in T. S. Thorsen (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Latin Love Elegy: 194–206.
Elisei, C. (2010) ‘P. Ouidii Nasonis Heroidum Epistula XV: Sappho Phaoni’. Diss. Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa: 239.
Elisei, C. (forthcoming a) ‘Sappho as a pupil of the praeceptor amoris and Sappho as magistra amoris: some lessons of the Ars Amatoria anticipated in Heroides 15’, in S. J. Harrison and T. S. Thorsen (eds) Sappho at Rome: Receptions from Lucretius to Martial.
Elisei, C. (forthcoming b) P. Ovidii Nasonis Heroidum Epistula 15: Sappho Phaoni: Introduzione, testo e commento. Berlin.
Ellis, R. (1892) ‘Ovidiana’, AJPh 13: 343–8.
Eschenburg, E. (1874) Metrische Untersuchungen über die Echtheit der Heroides des Ovids. Lübeck.
Eschenburg, E. (1886) Wie hat Ovid einzelne Wörter und Wortklassen im Verse verwandt? Ein Beitrag zur Echtheitsfrage der Heroides. Lübeck.
Evelyn White, H. G. (ed.) (1919) Ausonius (2 vols). Cambridge, Mass.
Farrell, J. (1998) ‘Reading and writing the Heroides’, HSCPh 98: 307–38.
Farrell, J. (2004) ‘Ovid’s Vergilian career’, MD 52: 41–55.
Fernández de la Cuesta González, B. (ed.) (2008) En la senda del Florilegium Gallicum: edición y estudio del florilegio del manuscrito Córdoba, Archivo Capitular 150 (Vol. 45). Louvaine-la-Neuve.
Festa, N. (ed.) (1902) Mythographi Graeci, III. Fasc. 2. Leipzig.
Fraenkel, E. (1964) ‘Selbstmordwege’, in Kleine Beiträge zur Klassischen Philologie (2 vols). Rome.
Francke, J. V. (1816) Callinus Siue Quaestionis de Origine Carminis Elegiaci Tractatio Critica. Hamburg.
Frazer, J. G. (ed.) (1929) Publii Ouidii Nasonis Fastorum libri sex: Edited with a translation and commentary (5 vols). London.
Frings, I. (2005) Das Spiel mit eigenen Texten: Wiederholung und Selbszitat bei Ovid. Munich.
Fritsen, A. (2005) ‘The renaissance after-life of Heroides 15’, Manuscripta 49/1: 41–58.
Fulkerson, L. (2002a) ‘Writing yourself to death: Strategies of (mis)reading in Heroides 2’, MD 48: 145–56.
Fulkerson, L. (2002b) ‘(Un)sympathetic magic: A study of Heroides 13,’ AJPh 123: 61–88.
Fulkerson, L. (2003) ‘Chain(ed) Mail: Hypermestra and the dual readership of Heroides 14’, TAPhA 133: 123–45.
Fulkerson, L. (2005) The Ovidian Heroine as Author: Reading, Writing and Community in Ovid’s Heroides. Cambridge.
Fulkerson, L. (2009) ‘The Heroides: Female elegy?’ in P. E. Knox (ed.) (2009a) A Companion to Ovid: 78–89.
Galand-Hallyn, P. (1991) ‘Corinne et Sappho: Élocutio et inventio dans les Amours et les Héroïdes d’Ovide’, BAGB 4: 336–58.
Gardner, H. H. (2013) Gendering Time in Augustan Elegy. Oxford.
Gee, E. (2000) Ovid, Aratus and Augustus. Cambridge.
Geise, B. (2001) ‘Die Tres Epistulae A. Sabini – antik oder humanistisch?’ Osnabrücker Online – Beitrage zu den Altertumswissenschaften 5.
Geymonat, M. and Della Corte, F. (eds) (1984–91) Enciclopedia Virgiliana (5 vols) Rome.
Gibson, R. K. (2003), Ovid: Ars Amatoria: Book 3. Cambridge.
Gibson, R. K. (2006) ‘Ovid, Augustus and the politics of moderation in Ars Amatoria 3’, in R. K. Gibson, S. Green and A. Sharrock (eds) The Art of Love: 121–42.
Gibson, R. K., Green, S. and Sharrock, A. (2006) (eds) The Art of Love: Bimillennial Essays on Ovid’s Ars Amatoria and Remedia amoris. Oxford.
Gold, B. (ed.) (2012) A Companion to Roman Love Elegy. Chichester.
Goold, G. P. (1974), ‘Review of Dörrie (1971)’, Gnomon 46: 475–84.
Gow, A. S. F. and Page, D. L. (eds) (1965) The Greek Anthology: Hellenistic Epigrams (2 vols). Cambridge.
Grafton, A. (1993) Joseph Scaliger: A Study in the History of Classical Scholarship, II: Historical Chronology. Oxford.
Green, R. P. (1991) The Works of Ausonius. Oxford.
Green, S. J. (2006) ‘Lessons in love: Fifty years of scholarship on the Ars Amatoria and the Remedia Amoris’, in R. K. Gibson, S. Green and A. Sharrock (eds) The Art of Love: 1–22.
Greene, E. and Skinner, M. B. (2009) The New Sappho on Old Age. Cambridge, Mass.
Gronewald, M. and Daniel, R. W. (2004a) ‘Ein neuer Sappho-Papyrus’, ZPE 147: 1–8.
Gronewald, M. and DanielR. W. (2004b) ‘Nachtrag zum neuen Sappho-Papyrus’, ZPE 149: 1–4.
Gurd, S. A. (2012) Work in Progress: Literary Revisions as Social Performance in Ancient Rome. Oxford.
Habinek, T. (1997) ‘The invention of sexuality in the world-city of Rome’, in T. Habinek and A. Sciesaro (eds) The Roman Cultural Revolution. Cambridge: 23–43.
Hallett, J. P. (2005) ‘Catullan voices in Heroides 15: How Sappho became a man’, Dictynna 2: 1–22.
Harder, A. (ed.) (2012) Callimachus: Aetia: Introduction, Text, and Translation, Commentary (2 vols). Oxford.
Hardie, A. (2005) ‘Sappho, the muses and life after death’, ZPE 154: 13–32.
Hardie, P. (ed.) (2002a) The Cambridge Companion to Ovid. Cambridge.
HardieP. (2002b) Ovid’s Poetics of Illusion. Cambridge.
HardieP. (2006) ‘Lethaeus Amor: The art of forgetting’, in R. K. Gibson, S. Green and A. Sharrock (eds) The Art of Love: 166–92.
Hardie, P. and Moore, H. (eds) (2010a) Classical Literary Careers and Their Reception. Cambridge.
Hardie, P. and Moore, H. (2010b) ‘Introduction: Literary careers – classical models and their receptions’, in P. Hardie and H. Moore (eds) Classical Literary Careers: 1–16.
Harrison, S. J. (1998) ‘The sword-belt of Pallas (Aeneid X.495–506): Symbolism and ideology’, in H.-P. Stahl (ed.) Vergil’s Aeneid: Augustan Epic and Political Context. London: 223–42.
Harrison, S. J. (2000) Apuleius: A Latin Sophist. Oxford.
Harrison, S. J. (2001) (ed.) Texts, Ideas and the Classics: Scholarship, Theory and Classical Literature. Oxford.
Harrison, S. J. (2002) ‘Ovid and genre: Evolutions of an elegist’, in P. Hardie (ed.) (2002a) The Cambridge Companion to Ovid: 79–95.
Harrison, S. J. (2007) Generic Enrichment in Vergil and Horace. Oxford.
Harrison, S. J. (2008) ‘Horace Epistles 2: The last Horatian book of Sermones?’, in F. Cairns (ed.) Hellenistic Greek and Augustan Latin Poetry, Flavian and post-Flavian Latin poetry, Greek and Roman Prose. Cambridge: 173–86.
Harrison, S. J. (forthcoming) ‘Shades of Sappho in Vergil’, in S. J. Harrison and T. S. Thorsen (eds) Sappho at Rome: Receptions from Lucretius to Martial.
Hartenberger, R. (1911) De O Finali apud Poetas Latinos ab Ennio usque ad Iuuenalem. Bonn.
Häuptli, B. W. (ed.) (1996) Publius Ouidius Naso, Ibis – Fragmente – Ouidiana. Zurich.
Heinsius, D. (ed.) (1629) Pub. Ouidii Nasonis Opera. Leiden.
Heinsius, N. (ed.) (1661) Pub. Ouidii Nasonis Opera. Leiden.
Heinze, T. (ed.) (1997) P. Ouidius Naso: Der XII. Heroidenbrief. Medea an Jason, mit einer Beilage, die Fragmente der Tragödie Medea. Leiden.
Heinze, T. (2013) ‘Review of Timo–Christian Spieß, Die Sabinus-Briefe: Humanistische Fälschung oder antike Literatur? Einleitung – Edition – Übersetzung – Kommentar. Trier 2012’, BMCR 2013.08.58.
Helzle, M. (1989) Publii Ouidii Nasonis Epistularum ex Ponto Liber IV: A Commentary on Poems 1 to 7 and 16. Hildesheim.
Henderson, J. (1986) ‘Becoming a heroine: Penelope’s Ovid’, LCM 11: 7–10, 21–4, 37–40, 67–70, 81–5, 113–21.
Henderson, J. (2006) ‘In Ovid with bed (Ars 2 and 3)’, in R. K. Gibson, S. Green and A. Sharrock (eds) The Art of Love: 77–95.
Heyworth, S. J. (ed.) (2007) Sexti Properti Elegos. Oxford.
Heyworth, S. J. (forthcoming) ‘Sappho in Propertius’, in S. J. Harrison and T. S. Thorsen (eds) Sappho at Rome: Receptions from Lucretius to Martial.
Hinds, S. (1987) The Metamorphosis of Persephone: Ovid and the Self-conscious Muse. Cambridge.
Hinds, S. (1993) ‘Medea in Ovid: Scenes from the life of an intertextual heroine’, MD 30: 9–47.
Hinds, S. (1998) Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.
Hollis, A. (1977) Ovid: Ars Amatoria. Book 1. Oxford.
Hollis, A. (2007) Fragments of Roman Poetry c.60 bc–ad 20: Edited with an Introduction, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford.
Holzberg, N. (2002) Ovid: The Poet and his Works. Ithaca.
Holzberg, N. (2006) ‘Staging the reader response: Ovid and his ‘contemporary audience’, in Ars and Remedia’, in R. K. Gibson, S. Green and A. Sharrock (eds) The Art of Love: 40–53.
Houghton, L. B. T. (2009) ‘Sexual puns in Ovid’s Ars and Remedia’, CQ 59: 280–5.
Housman, A. E. (1897) ‘Ovid’s Heroides’, CR 11: 286–90.
Housman, A. E. (1922) ‘Attamen and Ovid, Her. 1.2’, CQ 16: 88–91.
Hunter, R. (2002) ‘The sense of an author: Theocritus and [Theocritus]’, in R. Gibson and C. S. Kraus (eds) The Classical Commentaries: Histories, Practices, Theory. Leiden: 89–108.
Hunter, R. (2006) The Shadow of Callimachus: Studies in the Reception of Hellenistic Poetry at Rome. Cambridge.
Hunter, R. (forthcoming) ‘Notes on the ancient reception of Sappho’, in S. J. Harrison and T. S. Thorsen (eds) Sappho at Rome: Receptions from Lucretius to Martial.
Hutchinson, G. O. (2002) ‘The publication and individuality of Horaces “Odes” Books 1–3’, CQ 52: 517–37.
Hutchinson, G. O. (ed.) (2006) Sextus Propertius: Elegies, Book IV. Cambridge.
Ingleheart, J. (forthcoming) ‘Lesbia Vates: Images of Sappho in the poetry of Ovid’, in S. J. Harrison and T. S. Thorsen (eds) Sappho at Rome: Receptions from Lucretius to Martial.
Ingleheart, J. and Radice, K. (2011) Ovid: Amores, A Selection. London.
Jacobson, H. (1974) Ovid’s Heroides. Princeton.
Jahn, O. (1837) ‘A. Sabinus’, Zeitschrift für die Altertumswissenschaft 77: 631–2.
Jäkel, S. (1973) ‘The 14th Heroid letter of Ovid and the Danaid trilogy of Aeschylus’, Mnemos. 26: 239–48.
James, S. H. (2003) Learned Girls and Male Persuasion: Gender and Reading in Roman Love Elegy. Berkeley.
Janka, M. (1997) Ovid: Ars Amatoria: Buch 2: Kommentar. Heidelberg.
JankoR. (2005) ‘Sappho revisited’, Times Literary Supplement, 23.–30.12: 19.
Jezieski, A. S. (1886) De Uniuersis P. Ouidii Nasonis Epistulis Heroidum et Singillatim de Sapphus ad Phaonem Epistula. Ternopil.
Jezieski, A. S. (1888) Sapphus ad Phaonem EpistulamP. Ouidii Nasonis Esse Euincere Studet. Ternopil.
Johnson, P. (2008) Ovid before Exile: Art and Punishment in theMetamorphoses. Madison, Wisc.
Jolivet, J.-C. (2001) Allusion et fiction épistolaire dans les Héroïdes: Recherches sur l’intertextualité ovidienne. Collection de l’École Française de Rome 289. Paris.
Kassel, R. and Austin, C. (eds) (1983) Poetae Comici Graeci vol. i. Berlin.
Keil, H. (ed.) (1852–1923) Grammatici Latini (8 vols). Hildesheim.
Keith, A. M. (1994) ‘Corpus eroticum: Elegiac poetics and elegiac puellae in Ovid’s Amores’, CW 88: 27–40.
Keith, A. M. (1999) ‘Slender verse: Roman elegy and ancient rhetorical theory’, Mnemos. 52: 41–62.
Keith, A. M. (2008) Propertius: Poet of Love and Leisure. Duckworth.
Kennedy, D. (1982) ‘Gallus and the Culex’, CQ 32.2: 371–89.
Kennedy, D. (1984) ‘The epistolary mode of the first of Ovid’s Heroides’, CQ n.s. 34: 413–22.
Kennedy, D. (2006) ‘Vixisset Phyllis, si me foret usa magistro: Erotodidaxis and intertextuality’, in R. K. Gibson, S. Green and A. Sharrock (eds) The Art of Love: 54–76.
Kenney, E. J. (1969) ‘Ovid and the law’, YCS, 21: 243–63.
Kenney, E. J. (1979) ‘Two disputed passages in the Heroides’, CQ n.s. 29.2: 394–431.
Kenney, E. J. (ed.) (1995) P. Ouidi Nasonis: Amores, Medicamina faciei femineae, Ars amatoria, Remedia amoris, 2nd edn, reprinted with corrections. Oxford.
Kenney, E. J. (ed.) (1996) Ovid: Heroides XVI–XXI. Cambridge.
Knox, P. E. (1986) ‘Ovid’s Medea and the authenticity of Heroides 12’, HSPh 90: 207–23.
Knox, P. E. (1987) ‘Review of F. Verducci (1985)’, CPh 82: 272–4.
Knox, P. E. (ed.) (1995) Ovid:Heroides: Select Epistles. Cambridge.
Knox, P. E. (ed.) (2009a) A Companion to Ovid. Oxford.
Knox, P. E. (2009b) ‘Lost and spurious works’, in P. E. Knox (ed.) A Companion to Ovid. Oxford: 20–217.
Kranz, W (1961) ‘Sphragis: Ichform und Namensiegel als Eingangs- und Schlussmotive antiker Dichtung’, RhM 104.1: 3–46, 97–124.
Kroll, W. (1924) ‘Kreuzung der Gattungen’, in J. B. Metzler (ed.) Studien zum Verständnis der römischen Literatur. Stuttgart: 139–84.
Labate, M. (1984) L’arte di farsi amare: Modelli culturali e progetti didascalici nell’elegia ovidiana. Pisa.
Labate, M. (1987) ‘Elegia triste ed elegia lieta’, MD 19: 91–129.
Labate, M. (1994) ‘La forma dell’amore: Appunti sulla poesia erotica oraziana’, in Bimillenario della morte di Q. Orazio Flacco. Atti dei Convegni (vol. III), Atti dei Convegni di Venosa Napoli Roma (novembre 1993). Venosa: 69–87.
Labate, M. (2006), ‘Erotic aetiology: Romulus, Augustus and the rape of the Sabine women’ in R. K. Gibson, S. Green and A. Sharrock (eds) The Art of Love: 193–215.
Lachmann, K. (1848 = 1974), ‘De Ouidii Epistulis’, in J. Vahlen (ed.), Kleinere Schriften zur Klassischen Philologie von Karl Lachmann. Berlin: 56–61.
Landolfi, L. (2000) Scribentis imago: Eroine ovidiane e lamento epistolare. Bologna.
Lardinois, A. (2009) ‘The new Sappho poem (P. Köln. 21351 and 21376): Key to the old fragments’, in E. Greene and M. B. Skinner (eds) The New Sappho On Old Age: 41–58.
Laroux, N. (1991) Tragic Ways of Killing a Woman. Cambridge, Mass.
Leach, E. W. (2008) ‘Hypermestra’s querela: Coopting the Danaides in Horace Ode 3.11 and in Augustan Rome’, CW 102: 13–32.
Lightfoot, J. (1999) A Hellenistic Collection. Cambridge, Mass.
Lindheim, S. H. (2000) ‘Omnia uincit amor: Or, why Oenone should have known it would never work out (Eclogue 10 and Heroides 5)’, MD 41: 83–101.
Lindheim, S. H. (2003) Mail and Female: Epistolary Narrative and Desire in Ovid’sHeroides. Madison, Wisc.
Lingenberg, W. (2003) Das erste Buch der Heroidenbriefe: Echtheitskritische Untersuchungen. Padeborn.
Lipking, L. (1988) Abandoned Women and Poetic Tradition. Chicago.
Liveley, G. (2005) Ovid: Love Songs. London.
Lobel, E. and Page, D. L. (eds) (1955) Poetarum Lesbiorum Fragmenta. Oxford.
Loers, V. (1929–30) P. Ouidii Nasonis Heroides et A. Sabini Epistulae. Cologne.
Loers, V. (1846) ‘Über die Ächtheit der fünfzehnten Episteln des Ouidius’, RhM 2: 40–8.
Lowrie, M. (1997) Horace’s Narrative Odes. Oxford.
Lowrie, M. (2009) Writing, Performance, and Authority in Augustan Rome. Oxford.
Lyne, R. (2004), ‘Writing back to Ovid in the 1560s and 1570s’, Translation and Literature 13: 143–64.
Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1980) The Latin Love Poets from Catullus to Horace. Oxford.
Madvig, J. N. (1873) Aduersaria Critica ad Scriptores Latinos, vol. ii. Copenhagen.
Maltby, R. (ed.) (2002) Tibullus: Elegies: Text, Introduction and Commentary. Cambridge.
Martelli, F. (2013) Ovid’s Revisions: The Editor as Author. Cambridge.
Massimilla, G. (ed.) (1996) Callimaco: Aitia libro primo e secondo, introduzione, testo critico, traduzione e commento. Pisa.
McMeown, J. C. (ed.) (1987) Ovid: Amores I: Text and Prolegomena. Liverpool.
McMeown, J. C. (ed.) (1989) Ovid: Amores II: A Commentary on Book One. Leeds.
McMeown, J. C. (ed.) (1998) Ovid: Amores III: A Commentary on Book Two. Leeds.
Merkel, R. (1852) P. Ouidius Naso, vol. I. Leipzig.
Miller, F. J. (1916) Ovid: Metamorphoses. G. P. Goold (rev.) 2nd edn. Cambridge, Mass.
Miller, J. F. (2009) Apollo, Augustus and the Poets. Cambridge.
Miller, P. A. (2013) ‘The puella: Accept no substitutions!’, in T. S. Thorsen (ed.): 166–79.
Most, G. (1995) ‘Reflecting Sappho’ BICS 40: 15–38.
Most, G. (ed.) (2006) Hesiod: Theogony, Works and Days, Testimonia. Cambridge, Mass.
Monella, P. (2005) Procne e Filomela: Dal mito al simbolo letterario. Rome.
Mozley, J. H. (ed.) (1979) Ovid: The Art of Love and Other Poems. G. P. Goold (rev.), 2nd edn. Cambridge, Mass.
Murgatroyd, D. (1975) ‘Militia amoris and the Roman elegists’, Latomus 34: 159–79.
Murgia, C. E. (1984) ‘Imitation and authenticity in Ovid’s Metamorphoses 1.477 and Heroides 15’, AJPh 106: 456–74.
Murgia, C. E. (1986a) ‘The date of Ovid’s Ars Amatoria 3’, AJPh 107: 74–94.
Murgia, C. E. (1986b) ‘Influence of Ovid’s Remedia Amoris on Ars Amatoria and Amores 3’, CPh 81: 203–20.
Murray, A. T. (ed.) (1995) Homer: Odyssey (2 vols). G. E. Dimock (rev.), 2nd edn. Cambridge, Mass.
Myerowitz, M. (1985) Ovid’s Games of Love. Detroit.
Myerowitz-Levine, M. (2006), ‘Ovid’s evolution’, in R. K. Gibson, S. Green and A. Sharrock (eds) The Art of Love: 252–78.
Myers, K. S. (1990) ‘Ovid’s tecta ars: Amores 2.6, programmatics and the Parrot’, EMC 34: 367–74.
Nagy, G. (1973) ‘Phaeton, Sappho’s Phaon and the white rocks of Leucas’, HSCPh 77: 137–77.
Nauck, A. (1856) Tragicorum Graecorum Fragmenta. Leipzig.
Nethercut, W. R. (1970) ‘The ironic priest’, AJPh 385–407.
Nicolas, C. (2009) ‘la signature masquée du poète des Héroïdes’, in F. Biville et D. Vallat (eds) Onomastique et intertextualité dans la littérature latine, Maison de l’Orient et de la Méditerranée–Jean Pouilloux, 41. Lyon: 109–20.
Nisbet, R. G. M, and Hubbard, M. (1978) A Commentary on Horace: Odes Book II. Oxford.
Nisbet, R. G. M., and Rudd, N. (2004) A Commentary on Horace: Odes Book III. Oxford.
Obbink, D. (2009) ‘Sappho fragments 58–59’, in E. Greene and M. B. Skinner (eds) The New Sappho On Old Age: 7–17.
Obbink, D. (2014b) ‘Two new poems by Sappho’ZPE: 189: 32–49.
O’Gorman, E. (1997) ‘Love and the family: Augustus and Ovidian elegy’, Arethusa 30: 103–23.
Otis, B. (1945) ‘Horace and the elegists’, TAPhA 76: 177–90.
Ottone, M. D. (2007) ‘Which letter? Text and subtext in Ovid’s Heroides’. AJPh 128(3): 367–87.
Page, D. (1959) Sappho and Alcaeus, 2nd edn. Oxford.
Palmer, A. P. (ed.) (1874) P. Ouidii Nasonis Heroides XIV, London.
Palmer, A. P. and L. C. Purser (eds) (1898) P. Ouidii Nasonis Heroides with the Greek Translation of Planudes. Oxford.
Palmer, A. P. and L. C. Purser (eds) (2005) P. Ouidii Nasonis Heroides with the Greek Translation of Planudes. New, Additional Introduction by D. F. Kennedy. Bristol.
Parker, N. H. (1993) ‘Sappho schoolmistress’, TAPhA 123: 309–51.
Perkins, C. A. (1993) ‘Love’s arrow lost: Tibullan parody in Amores 3.9’, CW 86: 459–66.
Perkins, C. A. (2011) ‘The figure of elegy in Amores 3.1: elegy as puella, elegy as poeta, puella as poeta’, CW 104.3: 313–31.
Pestelli, A. (ed.) (2007) P. Ouidii Nasonis Heroidum Epistula VIII. Hermione Oresti. Florence.
Peters, W. (1882) Obseruationes ad P. Ouidii Nasonis Heroidum Epistulas. Leipzig.
Pfeiffer, R. (1949) Callimachus. (2 vols). Oxford.
Philippides, K. (1996) ‘Canace misunderstood: Ovid’s Heroides XI’, Mnemos. 49: 426–39.
Piazzi, L. (2007) P. Ouidii Nasonis Heroidum Epistula VII: Dido Aeneae. Florence.
Piazzi, L. (2013) ‘Elegy and other genres’, in T. S. Thorsen (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Latin Love Elegy: 224–38.
Piéri, M. (1895) Quaestiones ad Ouidii Nasonis Epistulas Heroidum et Praecipue Horum Carminum Artem Pertinentes. Marseille.
Plantin (= Plantinus), C. (1583) P. Ouidii Nasonis Heroidum Epistolas, Amorum Libros III, De Arte Amandi Libros III, De Remedio Amore Libros II, Omnia ex Accuratissima Andreæ Naugerij Castigatione. Guidonis Morilloni Argumenta in Epistolas, 2nd edn. Antwerp.
Platnauer, M. (1951) Latin Elegiac Verse: A Study of the Metrical Usages of Tibullus, Properius and Ovid. Cambridge.
Putnam, M. C. J. (2010) ‘Some Virgilian units’, in P. Hardie and H. Moore (eds) Classical Literary Careers: 17–38.
Quenemoen, C. K. (2006) ‘The portico of the Danaids: A new reconstruction’, AJA 2: 229–50.
Quinn, K. (ed.) (1970) Catullus: The Poems. London.
Rackley, S. A. (1986) ‘The amatory excerpts of Ovid in the Florilegium Gallicum: Evidence and knowledge of this poet in the twelfth century’, Florilegium 8: 71–112.
Rackley, S. A. (1992) ‘The excerpts from Ovid’s Heroides in the Florilegium Gallicum’, Manuscripta 36: 125–35.
Ramírez de Verger, A. (ed.) (2006a) Ouidius: Carmina Amatoria, 2nd edn. Munich.
Ramírez de Verger, A. (2006b) ‘A note on Ovid, “Heroides” 15,113’, Hermes 134: 123–4.
Ramírez de Verger, A. (2009) ‘La carta de Safo a Faón de Ovidio (Her. 15)’, Emerita 77: 187–222.
Raven, D. S. (1965) Latin Metre. Bristol.
Raymond, E. (2013) ‘Gaius Cornelius Gallus “the inventor of Latin love elegy”’, in T. S. Thorsen (ed.): 59–67.
Reeson, J. (2001) Ovid: Heroides 11, 13 and 14. Leiden.
Reeve, M. D. (1978) ‘The Tilianus of Ausonius’, RhM 121: 350–66.
Riese, A. (1871) P. Ouidii Nasonis Carmina, Vol. I. Leipzig.
Rimell, V. (1999) ‘Epistolary fictions: Authorial identity in Heroides 15’, PCPhS 45: 109–33.
Roberts, D. H., Dunn, F. M. and Fowler, D. (eds) (1997) Classical Closure. Princeton.
Roggia, A. (2011) P. Ouidii Nasonis: Heroidum Epistula XIII: Laodamia Protesilao. Florence.
Rosati, G. (ed.) (1985) Ovidio: Cosmetici delle donne. Venice.
Rosati, G. (1989) (ed.) Ovidio: Lettere di eroine. Milan.
Rosati, G. (1990) ‘Note al testo delle Heroides’, MD 24: 61–79.
Rosati, G. (1992) ‘L’elegia al femminile: Le Heroides di Ovidio (e altre heroides)’, MD 29: 71–94.
Rosati, G. (1996) ‘Sabinus, the Heroides and the poet-nightingale: Some observations on the authenticity of the Epistula Sapphus’, CQ 46: 207–16.
Rosati, G. (2006) ‘The art of Remedia amoris: Unlearning to love?’, in R. K. Gibson, S. Green and A. Sharrock (eds) The Art of Love: 143–65.
Ross, D. O. (1975) Background to Augustan Poetry: Gallus, Elegy and Rome. Cambridge.
Rouse, R. H. and Reeve, M. D. (1983) ‘Tibullus’, in L. D. Reynolds (ed.) Texts and Transmission. Oxford: 420–5.
Rutherford, R. (2007) ‘Poetics and literary criticism’, in S. J. Harrison (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Horace. Cambridge: 248–61.
Sabot, A.-F. (1976) Ovide, poète de l’amour dans ses æuvres de jeunesse. Paris.
Saylor, C. (1967) ‘Querelae: Propertius’ distinctive, technical name for his elegy’, Agon 1: 142–9.
Scivoletto, N. (1976) Musa iocosa: Studio sulla poesia giovanile di Ovidio. Rome.
Schneidewin, F. W. (1843) ‘Ovids fünfzehner Brief’, RhM 2: 138–44.
Schneidewin, F. W. (1845) ‘Ovids fünfzehner Brief’, RhM 3: 144–6.
Schuckburgh, E. (1879) P. Ouidii Nasonis: Heroidum epistulae XIII. London.
Sedlmayer, H. S. (1878) Prolegomena Critica ad Heroides Ouidianas. Vienna.
Sedlmayer, H. S. (1881) Kritische Commentar zu Ovids Heroiden. Vienna.
Sedlmayer, H. S. (1886) P. Ouidi Nasonis Heroides. Vienna.
Sharrock, A. (1994) Seduction and Repetition in Ovid’s Ars Amatoria II. Oxford.
SharrockA. (1995) ‘The drooping rose: Elegiac failure in Amores 3.7’, Ramus 24: 152–80.
SharrockA. (2002) ‘Gender and sexuality’, in P. A. Hardie (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Ovid: 95–107.
SharrockA. (2006) ‘Love in parenthesis: Digression and narrative hierarchy in Ovid’s erodotidactic poems’: 23–39.
Showerman, G. (ed.) (1977) The Heroides, The Amores. G. P. Goold (rev.), 2nd edn. Cambridge, Mass.
Spentzou, E. (2003) Readers and Writers in Ovid’sHeroides. Oxford.
Spieß, T.-C. (2012) Die Sabinus-Briefe: Humanistische Fälschung oder antike Literatur? Einleitung – Edition – Übersetzung – Kommentar. Trier.
Spoth, F. (1992) Ovids Heroides als Elegien. Munich.
Stagni, E. (2006) ‘Testi latini e biblioteche tra Parigi e la valle della Loira (secoli xii–xiii). I manoscritti di Guido de Grana’, Atti Boccaccio: 221–87.
Syme, R. (1939) The Roman Revolution. Oxford.
Syme, R. (1978) History in Ovid. Oxford.
Syndikus, H. P. (1998) ‘Horaz und die elegischen Dichter’, in: A. E. Radke (ed.), Candide iudex: Beiträge zur augusteischen Dichtung: Festschrift für Walter Wimmel zum 75. Geburtstag. Stuttgart: 375–98.
Syndikus, H. P. (1990) Catull: eine Interpretation. Darmstadt.
Tarrant, R. J. (1981) ‘The authenticity of the letter of Sappho to Phaon (Heroides XV)’, HSPh 85: 133–53.
Tarrant, R. J. (1983) ‘Ovid, Heroides, Epistula Sapphus,’ in L. D. Reynolds (ed.) Texts and Transmission. Oxford: 257–84.
Tarrant, R. J. (1989) ‘The reader as Author: Collaborative interpolation in Latin poetry’, in J. N. Grant (ed.), Editing Greek and Latin Texts, New York: 121–62.
Thévenaz, O. (2009a) ‘Forme épistolaire et communication littéraire dans la lettre ovidienne de Sappho à Phaon’, in F. Toulze-Morisset (ed.), Formes de l’écriture, figures de la pensée dans la culture gréco-romaine. Lille: 143–65.
Thévenaz, O. (2009b) ‘Auctoris nomina Sapphus: Noms et création d’une persona littéraire dans l’Héroïde XV ovidienne’, in F. Biville and D. Vallat (eds) Onomastique et intertextualité dans la littérature latine. Lyon: 121–42.
Thévenaz, O. (2010) ‘Sappho à Rome: Poétiques en échos de Catulle à Horace’. Diss. Université de Lausanne: 335.
Thomas, R. F. (1993), ‘Sparrows, hares and doves: A Catullan metaphor and its tradition’, Helios 20: 131–42.
Thomas, R. F. (2009) ‘Ovid’s reception of Vergil’, in P. E. Knox (ed.) A Companion to Ovid: 294–307.
Thorsen, T. S. (2007) ‘Scribentis Imagines in Ovidian Authorship and Scholarship: A Study of the Epistula Sapphus.’ Diss. University of Bergen.
Thorsen, T. S. (2008) ‘Fra fomlende flørt til professor i elskov’, Kunst og kultur 4: 252–62.
Thorsen, T. S. (2012) ‘Sappho, Corinna and colleagues in ancient Rome: Tatian’s catalogue of statues (Oratio ad Graecos 33–34) reconsidered’ Mnemos. 65: 695–715.
Thorsen, T. S. (ed.) (2013a) The Cambridge Companion to Latin Love Elegy. Cambridge.
Thorsen, T. S. (2013b) ‘Introduction: Latin love elegy’, in T. S. Thorsen (ed.): 1–20.
Thorsen, T. S. (2013c) ‘Ovid the Latin love elegist’, in T. S. Thorsen (ed.): 114–29.
Thorsen, T. S. (2013d) ‘The Latin elegiac couplet’, in T. S. Thorsen (ed.): 367–78.
Tolkiehn, J. (1888) Quaestionum ad Heroides Ouidianas Spectantium Capita VII. Leipzig.
Tomei, M. A. (1990) ‘Le tre “Danaidi” in nero antico dal Palatino’, Bollettino di Archeologia 5–6: 35–48.
Treu, M. (1953) ‘Ovid und Sappho’, PP 8: 356–64.
Ullman, B. L. (1932) ‘Classical authors in certain mediaeval Florilegia’, CPh 27: 1–42.
Verducci, F. (1985), Ovid’s Toyshop of the Heart. Princeton.
Volk, K. (2006) ‘Ars amatoria romana: Ovid on love as cultural construct’, in R. K. Gibson, S. Green and A. Sharrock (eds) The Art of Love: 235–51.
Volk, K. (2010) Ovid. Chichester.
Wheeler, A. L. (ed.) (1988) Ovid: Tristia, Ex Ponto. G. P. Goold (rev.), 2nd edn. Cambridge, Mass.
Williams, F. (2003) ‘The hands of death: Ovid Amores 3.9.20’, AJPh 124: 225–34.
Williams, G. D. (1992) ‘Ovid’s Canace: Dramatic irony in Heroides 11’, CQ n.s. 42: 201–9.
Williams, G. D. (1994) Banished Voices: Readings in Ovid’s Exile Poetry. Cambridge.
Williams, G. D. (1997) ‘Writing in the mother-tongue: Hermione and Helen in Heroides 8’, Ramus 26: 113–37.
Wiseman, T. P. (1969) Catullan Questions. Leicester.
Woodman, T. (2002) ‘Biformis Vates: The Odes, Catullus and Greek lyric’, in D. Feeney and T. Woodman (eds) Traditions and Contexts in the Poetry of Horace. Cambridge: 53–64.
Woodman, T. (2012) ‘A covering letter: Poem 56’, in I. M. le M. du Quesnay and A. J. Woodman (eds) Catullus: Poems, Books, Readers. Cambridge: 130–52.
Wyke, M. (2002) The Roman Mistress. Oxford.
Yatromanolakis, D. (2007) Sappho in the Making: The Early Reception. Washington.
Zingerle, W. (1878) Untersuchungen zur Echtheitsfrage der Heroiden Ovids. Erlangen.
Zwierlein, O. (1999) Die Ovid- und Vergil-Revision in tiberischer Zeit. Berlin.