doi:10.1017/CBO9781139683647

References

Adams, S. A., “Paul the Roman Citizen: Roman Citizenship in the Ancient World and Its Importance for Understanding Acts 22:22–28,” in Porter, S. E. (ed.), Paul: Jew, Greek, and Roman, PAST 5, Leiden: Brill, 2008, 309–26.

Aletti, J.-N., “La presence d'un modèle rhétorique en Romains,” Bib 71 (1990), 1–24.

Aletti, J.-N., “Rm 1,18–3,20: Incohérence ou cohérence de l'argumentation paulinienne?” Bib 69 (1988), 47–62.

Alexander, L., “Hellenistic Letter-Forms and the Structure of Philippians,” JSNT 12 (1989), 87–101.

Allen, D. S., The World of Prometheus: The Politics of Punishing in Democratic Athens, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, 2000.

Amadi-Azuogu, C. A., Paul and the Law in the Arguments of Galatians: A Rhetorical and Exegetical Analysis of Galatians 2,24–6,2, BBB 104, Weinheim: Beltz Athenäum Verlag, 1996.

Anderson, R. D. Jr., Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Paul, CBET 18, Kampen: Pharos, 1996.

Antin, P., “Mori Lucrum et Antigone 462, 464,” RSR 62 (1974), 259–60.

Arnold, C. E., “I Am Astonished That You Are So Quickly Turning Away (Gal 1.6): Paul and Anatolian Folk Belief,” NTS 51 (2005), 429–49.

Ascough, R. S., Paul's Macedonian Associations, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2003.

Ascough, R. S., What are they Saying about the Formation of Pauline Churches? New York: Paulist, 1998.

Aune, D. E., The New Testament in Its Literary Environment, LEC 8, Philadelphia: Westminster, 1987.

Aune, D. E., Revelation 1–5, WBC 52a, Dallas: Word, 1997.

Aune, D. E., “Review of Galatians: A Commentary on Paul's Letter to the Churches in Galatia by H. D. Betz,” RSR 7 (1981), 323–8.

Aune, D. E., “Romans as Logos Protreptikos in the Context of Ancient Religious and Philosophical Propaganda,” in Hengel, M. and Heckel, U. (eds.), Paulus und das antike Judentum, WUNT 58, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1991, 91–124.

Aune, D. E., “The Use and Abuse of Enthymemes in New Testament Scholarship,” NTS 49 (2003), 299–320.

Aune, D. E., The Westminster Dictionary of New Testament and Early Christian Literature and Rhetoric, Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2010.

Bachmann, M., Sünder oder Übertreter: Studien zur Argumentation in Gal 2,15ff, WUNT 59, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1992.

Bachmann, M., “Zur Argumentation von Gal 3,1–12,” NTS 53 (2007), 524–44.

Bagnall, R. S., Everyday Writing in the Graeco-Roman East, Berkeley: University of California, 2011.

Bagnall, R. S., Reading Papyri, Writing Ancient History, London: Routledge, 1995.

Barclay, J. M. G., Jews in the Mediterranean Diaspora From Alexander to Trajan (323 BCE – 117 CE), Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1996.

Barclay, J. M. G., Obeying the Truth: A Study of Paul's Ethics in Galatians, SNTW, Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1988, Minneapolis: Fortress, 1991.

Barclay, J. M. G., “Paul among Diaspora Jews: Anomaly or Apostate?” JSNT 60 (1995), 89–120.

Barrett, C. K., A Commentary on the Second Epistle to the Corinthians, BNTC, London: A&C Black, 1973.

Bauckham, R. J., Jude, 2 Peter, WBC 50, Dallas: Word, 1983.

Beard, M. (ed.), Literacy in the Roman World, Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplement Series 3, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1991.

Becker, J., Paulus: Der Apostel der Völker, 2nd ed., Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1992.

Berchman, R. M., “Galatians (1:1–5): Paul and Greco-Roman Rhetoric,” in Neusner, J. and Frerichs, E. S. (eds.), New Perspectives on Ancient Judaism III, Lanhman, MD: University Press of America, 1987, 1–15.

Bergen, B. K., Louder Than Words: The New Science of How the Mind Makes Meaning, New York: Basic Books, 2012.

Berger, K., Formgeschichte des Neuen Testaments, Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer, 1984.

Berger, K., “Hellenistische Gattungen im Neuen Testament,” ANRW 2.25.2, Berlin: de Gruyter, 1984, 1326–63.

Berry, D. H., and Heath, M., “Oratory and Declamation,” in Porter, S. E. (ed.), Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period 330 B.C.–A.D. 400, Leiden: Brill, 1993, 393–420.

Betz, H. D., 2 Corinthians 8 and 9: A Commentary on Two Administrative Letters of the Apostle Paul, Hermeneia, Philadelphia: Fortress, 1985.

Betz, H. D., Der Apostel Paulus und die sokratische Tradition: Eine exegetische Untersuchung zu seiner “Apologie” 2 Korinther 10–13, BHTh 45, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1972.

Betz, H. D., “In Defense of the Spirit: Paul's Letter to the Galatians as a Document of Early Christian Apologetics,” in Schüssler, E. (ed.), Aspects of Religious Propaganda in Judaism and Early Christianity, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame, 1976, 99–114.

Betz, H. D., Galatians: A Commentary on Paul's Letter to the Churches in Galatia, Hermeneia, Philadelphia: Fortress, 1979. German Translation: Der Galaterbrief, Munich: Kaiser, 1988.

Betz, H. D., “The Literary Composition and Function of Paul's Letter to the Galatians,” NTS 21 (1975), 353–79.

Betz, H. D., “The Problem of Rhetoric and Theology According to the Apostle Paul,” in Vanhoye, A. (ed.), L'Apôtre Paul: Personalité, style et conception du ministère, BETL 73, Leuven: Leuven University, 1986, 16–21.

Bickmann, J., Kommunikation gegen den Tod: Studien zur paulinischen Briefpragmatik am Beispiel des ersten Thessalonicherbriefes, Würzburg: Echter, 1998.

Bitzer, L., “The Rhetorical Situation,” Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 (1968), 1–14.

Bjerkelund, C. J., Parakalȏ: Form, Funktion und Sinn der parakalȏ-Säzte in den paulinischen Briefen, Bibliotheca Theologica Norvegica 1, Oslo: Universitetsvorlaget, 1967.

Black, C. C., and Watson, D. F. (eds.), Words Well Spoken: George Kennedy's Rhetoric of the New Testament, SRR 8, Waco, TX: Baylor University, 2008.

Bloomquist, L. G., The Function of Suffering in Philippians, JSNTSup 78, Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1993.

Bloomquist, L. G., “Methodological Criteria for Apocalyptic Rhetoric: A Suggestion for the Expanded Use of Sociorhetorical Analysis,” in Carey, G. and Bloomquist, L. G. (eds.), Vision and Persuasion: Rhetorical Dimensions of Apocalyptic Discourse, St. Louis: Chalice, 1999, 181–203.

Bloomquist, L. G., “Paul's Inclusive Language: The Ideological Texture of Romans 1,” in Gowler, D. B., Bloomquist, L. G., and Watson, D. (eds.), Fabrics of Discourse: Essays in Honor of Vernon K. Robbins, Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International, 2003, 165–93.

Bloomquist, L. G., “A Possible Direction for Providing Programmatic Correlation of Textures in Socio-Rhetorical Analysis,” in Porter, S. E. and Stamps, D. L. (eds.), Rhetorical Criticism and the Bible, JSNTSup 195, Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 2002, 61–96.

Bloomquist, L. G., “The Role of Argumentation in the Miracle Stories of Luke-Acts: Toward a Fuller Identification of Miracle Discourse for Use in Sociorhetorical Interpretation,” in Watson, D. F. (ed.), Miracle Discourse in the New Testament, Atlanta: SBL, 2012, 85–124.

Bloomquist, L. G., “The Role of the Audience in the Determination of Argumentation: The Gospel of Luke and the Acts of the Apostles,” in Eriksson, A., Olbricht, T. H., and Übelacker, W. (eds.), Rhetorical Argumentation in Biblical Texts, ESEC 8, Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International, 2002, 157–73.

Bloomquist, L. G., “Suffering and Joy: Subverted by Joy in Paul's Letter to the Philippians,” Int 61 (2007), 270–82.

Bonner, S. F., Education in Ancient Rome: From the Elder Cato to the Younger Pliny, Berkeley: University of California, 1977.

Booth, A. D., “Elementary and Secondary Education in the Roman Empire,” Florilegium 1 (1979), 1–14.

Booth, A. D., “The Schooling of Slaves in First Century Rome,” TAPA 109 (1979), 11–19.

Bormann, E. G., “Fantasy Theme Analysis and Rhetorical Theory,” in Golden, J., Berquist, G., and Coleman, W. (eds.), Rhetoric of Western Thought, 5th ed., Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt, 1992, 365–84.

Bormann, E. G., “Symbolic Convergence Theory: A Communication Formulation,” Journal of Communication 35 (1985), 128–38.

Bornkamm, G., “The History of the Origin of the So-called Second Letter to the Corinthians,” NTS 8 (1962), 258–63.

Bornkamm, G., Paul, New York: Harper & Row, 1971.

Botha, P. J. J., “Greco-Roman Literacy as Setting for New Testament Writings,” Neot 26 (1992), 195–215.

Botha, P. J. J., “Letter Writing and Oral Communication in Antiquity: Suggested Implications for the Interpretation of Paul's Letter to the Galatians,” Scriptura 42 (1992), 17–34.

Botha, P. J. J., Orality and Literacy in Early Christianity, Biblical Performance Criticism 5, Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2012.

Bowersock, G. S., Fiction as History: Nero to Julian, Berkeley: University of California, 1994.

Brinsmead, B. H., Galatians–Dialogical Response to Opponents, SBLDS 65, Chico, CA: Scholars, 1982.

Brown, J. K., “Direct Engagement of the Reader in Matthew's Discourses: Rhetorical Techniques and Scholarly Consensus,” NTS 51 (2005), 19–35.

Bruce, F. F., Paul: Apostle of the Heart Set Free, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1977.

Brucker, R., ‘Christushymnen’ oder ‘epideiktische Passagen’? Studien zum Stilwechsel im Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt, FRLANT 176, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1997.

Brucker, R., “Versuche ich den jetzt, den Menschen zu überreden?” in Alkier, S. and Brucker, R. (eds.), Exegese und Methodendiskussion, TANZ 23, Tübingen: Francke, 1998, 211–37.

Bruxelles, S., Ducrot, O., and Raccah, P., “Argumentation and the Lexical Topical Fields,” Journal of Pragmatics 24 (1995), 99–114.

Bryant, R. A., The Risen Crucified Christ in Galatians, SBLDS 31, Atlanta: Scholars, 2001.

Bultmann, R., The Second Letter to the Corinthians, trans. Harrisville, R. A., Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1995.

Burk, D., “The Righteousness of God (Dikaisounē Theou) and Verbal Genitives: A Grammatical Clarification,” JSNT 34 (2012), 346–60.

Burke, K., Counter-Statement, Berkeley: University of California, 1931.

Burkert, W., Greek Religion, trans. Raffan, J., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1985.

Burridge, R. A., “The Gospels and Acts,” in Porter, S. E. (ed.), Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period 330 B.C.–A.D. 400, Leiden: Brill, 1997, 507–53.

Burton, E., A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Galatians, New York: Scribners, 1920.

Butler, H. E., Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian. Vol. III, LCL, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1976.

Byrskog, S., Story as History – History as Story: The Gospel Tradition in the Context of Ancient Oral History, WUNT 123, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000.

Caird, G. B., Paul's Letters from Prison (Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, Philemon) in the Revised Standard Version, New Clarendon Bible, Oxford: Oxford University, 1976.

Calhoun, R. M., “John Chrysostom on ΕΚ ΠΙΣΤΕΩΣ ΕΙΣ ΠΙΣΤΙΝ in Rom. 1:17: A Reply to Charles L. Quarles,” NovT 48 (2006), 131–46.

Callander, T., “The Tarsian Orations of Dio Chrysostom,” JHS 24 (1904), 58–69.

Campbell, D. A., The Deliverance of God: An Apocalyptic Rereading of Justification in Paul, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009.

Campbell, D. A., “An Echo of Scripture in Paul and Its Implications,” in Wagner, J. R., Rowe, C. K., and Grieb, A. K. (eds.), The Word Leaps the Gap: Essays on Scripture and Theology in Honor of Richard B. Hays, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2008, 367–91.

Campbell, D. A., “Romans 1:17 – A Crux Interpretum for the Pistis Christou Debate,” JBL 113 (1994), 265–85.

Carlson, R. P., “Whose Faith? Reexamining Habakkuk 2:4 Citation within the Communicative Act Romans 1:1–17,” in Noll, K. L. and Schramm, B. (eds.), Raising Up a Faithful Exegete: Essays in Honor of Richard D. Nelson, Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2010, 293–324.

Cartledge, P., “Literacy in the Spartan Oligarchy,” JHS 98 (1978), 25–37.

Castelli, E. A., Imitating Paul: A Discourse of Power, LCBI, Louisville: Westminster, 1991.

Ceccarelli, P., Ancient Greek Letter Writing, a Cultural History (600 BC–150 BC), Oxford: Oxford University, 2013.

Chapa, J., “Consolatory Patterns? 1 Thes 4,13.18; 5,11,” in Collins, R. F. (ed.), The Thessalonian Correspondence, BETL 87, Leuven: Leuven University, 1990, 220–8.

Charles, R. H. (trans.), The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament in English, Oxford: Clarendon, 1913.

Ciampa, R. E., The Presence and Function of Scripture in Galatians 1 and 2, WUNT 2/102, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1998.

Ciampa, R. E., and Rosner, B. S., “The Structure and Argument of 1 Corinthians,” NTS 52 (2006), 205–18.

Clackson, J., “Language Maintenance and Language Shift in the Mediterranean World during the Roman Empire,” in Mullen, A. and James, P. (eds.), Multilingualism in the Graeco-Roman Worlds, Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2012, 36–57.

Clark, D. L., Rhetoric in Greco-Roman Education, Morningside Heights, NY: Columbia University, 1957.

Clarke, A. D., Secular and Christian Leadership in Corinth: A Socio-Historical and Exegetical Study of 1 Corinthians 1–6, AGJU 18, Leiden: Brill, 1993.

Classen, C. J., “Kann die rhetorische Theorie helfen, das Neue Testament, vor allem die Briefe des Paulus, besser zu verstehen?” ZNW 100 (2009), 145–72.

Classen, C. J., “Paul's Epistles and Ancient Greek and Roman Rhetoric,” in Nanos, M. D. (ed.), The Galatians Debate: Contemporary Issues in Rhetorical and Historical Interpretation, Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2002, 95–113.

Classen, C. J., “Paulus und die antike Rhetorik,” ZNW 82 (1991), 1–32.

Classen, C. J., “Philologische Bemerkungen zur Sprache des Apostels Paulus,” Wiener Studien 107/108 (1994/1995), 321–35.

Classen, C. J., “The Speeches in the Courts of Law: A Three-Cornered Dialogue,” Rhetorica 9 (1991), 195–207.

Classen, C. J., Recht Rhetorik Politik: Untersuchungen zu Ciceros rhetorischer Technik, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1985.

Classen, C. J., Rhetorical Criticism of the New Testament, WUNT 128, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000.

Classen, C. J., “Das vierte genus causarum,” Studii Clasice 37–9 (2001–3), 203–16.

Cobb, J. B. Jr., and Lull, D. J., Romans, Chalice Commentaries for Today, St. Louis: Chalice, 2005.

Collins, R. F., Studies on the First Letter to the Thessalonians, Leuven: Leuven University, 1984.

Cooper, S. A., Marius Victorinus’ Commentary on Galatians, OECS, Oxford: Oxford University, 2005.

Cooper, S. A., “Narratio and Exhortatio in Galatians According to Marius Victorinus,” ZNW 91 (2000), 107–35.

Cosgrove, C. H., “Arguing like a Mere Human Being: Galatians 3:15–18 in Rhetorical Perspective,” NTS (1988), 536–49.

Cotter, W., Miracles in Greco-Roman Antiquity: A Sourcebook, London: Routledge, 1999.

Cranfield, C. E. B., A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans, 2 vols., ICC, Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1975–1979.

Cribiore, R., Gymnastics of the Mind: Greek Education in Hellenistic and Roman Egypt, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, 2001.

Cribiore, R., The School of Libanius in Late Antique Antioch, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, 2007.

Cribiore, R., Writing, Teachers, and Students in Graeco-Roman Egypt, ASP 36, Atlanta: Scholars, 1996.

Cross, F. M., Freedman, D. N., and Sanders, J. A., Scrolls from Qumran Cave 1, Jerusalem: Albright Institute of Archaeological Research and Shrine of the Book, 1972.

Cugusi, P., Evoluzione e Forme dell’ Epistolografia Latina nella Tarda Repubblica e nei Primi Due Secoli dell’ Impero con Cenni sull’ Epistolografia Preciceroniana, Rome: Herder, 1983.

Dahl, N. A., “Paul's Letter to the Galatians: Epistolary Genre, Content, and Structure,” in Nanos, M. D. (ed.), The Galatians Debate: Contemporary Issues in Rhetorical and Historical Interpretation, Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2002, 117–42.

Daly, L. W., “Roman Study Abroad,” AJP 71 (1950), 40–58.

Danker, F. W., “Paul's Debt to the De Corona of Demosthenes: A Study of Rhetorical Techniques in Second Corinthians,” in Watson, D. F. (ed.), Persuasive Artistry: Studies in New Testament Rhetoric in Honor of George A. Kennedy, JSNTSup 50, Sheffield: JSOT, 1991, 262–80.

Das, A. A., Solving the Romans Debate, Minneapolis: Fortress, 2007.

Daube, D., “Rabbinic Methods of Interpretation and Hellenistic Rhetoric,” HUCA 22 (1949), 239–64.

Davies, M., Rhetoric and Reference in the Fourth Gospel, JSNTSup 69, Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1992.

Debanné, M. J., Enthymemes in the Letters of Paul, LNTS 303, London: T&T Clark, 2006.

de Boer, M., Galatians: A Commentary, NTL, Louisville: WJKP, 2011.

Deissmann, A., Light from the Ancient East: The New Testament Illustrated by Recently Discovered Texts of the Graeco-Roman World, trans. Strachan, L. R. M., New York: Hodder and Stoughton, 1910.

Deissmann, A., Paul: A Study in Social and Religious History, New York: Hodder and Stoughton, 1926.

deSilva, D. A., Global Readings: A Sri Lankan Commentary on Paul's Letter to the Galatians, Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2011.

deSilva, D. A., Honor, Patronage, Kinship and Purity: Unlocking New Testament Culture, Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2000.

Dewey, J., “Textuality in an Oral Culture: A Survey of the Pauline Traditions,” Semeia 65 (1994), 37–64.

Dibelius, M., Paul, ed. Kümmel, W. G., trans. Clarke, F., Philadelphia: Westminster, 1953.

Dickey, E., Ancient Greek Scholarship: A Guide to Finding, Reading, and Understanding Scholia, Commentaries, Lexica, and Grammatical Treatises from their Beginnings to the Byzantine Period, New York and Oxford: Oxford University, 2006.

Diefenbach, M., Die Komposition des Lukasevangeliums unter Berücksichtigung antiker Rhetorikelemente, FTS 43, Frankfurt: Josef Knecht, 1993.

DiMattei, S., “Paul's Allegory of the Two Covenants (Gal 4.21–31) in Light of First-Century Hellenistic Rhetoric and Jewish Hermeneutics,” NTS 52 (2006), 102–22.

Dodds, E. R., Pagan and Christian in an Age of Anxiety: Some Aspects of Religious Experience Form Marcus Aurelius to Constantine, Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1965.

Doering, L., Ancient Jewish Letters and the Beginnings of Christian Epistolography, WUNT 298, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2012.

Donfried, K. P. (ed.), The Romans Debate, rev. and exp. ed., Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1991.

Donfried, K. P., and Marshall, I. H., The Theology of the Shorter Pauline Letters, New Testament Theology, Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1993.

Donfried, K. P., and Beutler, J. (eds.), The Thessalonians Debate: Methodological Discord or Methodological Synthesis? Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2000.

Dormeyer, D., Das Neue Testament im Rahmen der antiken Literaturgeschichte, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1993.

Doty, W. G., “The Classification of Epistolary Literature,” CBQ 31 (1969), 183–99.

Downing, G., “Ambiguity, Ancient Semantics, and Faith,” NTS 56 (2010), 139–62.

Du Toit, A. B., “A Tale of Two Cities: ‘Tarsus or Jerusalem’ Revisited,” NTS 46 (2000), 375–402.

DuBois, P., Torture and Truth, New York: Routledge, 1991.

Duff, P. B., “The Mind of the Redactor: 2 Cor. 6:17–7:1 in Its Secondary Context,” NovT 35 (1993), 160–80.

Dunn, J. D. G., “Prolegomena to a Theology of Paul,” NTS 40 (1994), 407–32.

Dunn, J. D. G., Romans 1–8, WBC 38a, Dallas: Word, 1988.

Dunn, J. D. G., Romans 9–16, WBC 38b, Dallas: Word, 1988.

Dunn, J. D. G., The Theology of Paul the Apostle, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998.

Eagleton, T., Literary Theory: An Introduction, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 1983.

Elliott, J. H., “Social-Scientific Criticism of the New Testament: More on Methods and Models,” in Elliott, J. H. (ed.), Social and Scientific Criticism of the New Testament and Its Social World, Semeia 35, Decatur, GA: Scholars, 1986, 1–33.

Elliott, N., The Arrogance of Nations: Reading Romans in the Shadow of Empire, Paul in Critical Contexts Series, Minneapolis: Fortress, 2008.

Elliott, N., The Rhetoric of Romans: Argumentative Constraint and Strategy and Paul's Dialogue with Judaism, JSNTSup 45, Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1990.

Eriksson, A., “Enthymemes in Pauline Argumentation: Reading between the Lines in 1 Corinthians,” in Eriksson, A., Olbricht, T. H., and Übelacker, W. (eds.), Rhetorical Argumentation in Biblical Texts: Essays from the Lund 2000 Conference, ESEC 8, Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International, 2002, 243–59.

Eriksson, A., Traditions as Rhetorical Proof: Pauline Argumentation in 1 Corinthians, ConBNT 29, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International, 1998.

Eriksson, A., Olbricht, T. H., and Übelacker, W. (eds.), Rhetorical Argumentation in Biblical Texts, ESEC 8, Harrisburg: Trinity Press International, 2002.

Erikson, E. H., Identity: Youth and Crisis, New York: W. W. Norton, 1968.

Exler, F. X. J., The Form of the Ancient Greek Letter: A Study in Greek Epistolography, Washington, DC: Catholic University of America, 1923.

Fahnestock, J., “Rhetoric in the Age of Cognitive Science,” in Graff, R., Walzer, A. E., and Atwell, J. A. (eds.), The Viability of the Rhetorical Tradition, New York: SUNY, 2005, 159–80.

Fairweather, , “The Epistle to the Galatians and Classical Rhetoric: Parts 1 & 2,” TynBul 45 (1994), 2–22.

Fahnestock, J., “The Epistle to the Galatians and Classical Rhetoric: Part 3,” TynBul 45 (1994), 213–43.

Fauconnier, G., “Rethinking Metaphor,” in Gibbs, R. (ed.), Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, New York: Cambridge University, 2008, 53–66.

Fauconnier, G., and Turner, M., The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities, New York: Basic Books, 2003.

Fauconnier, G., and Turner, M., “Compression and Global Insight,” Cognitive Linguistics 11 (2000), 283–304.

Fee, G. D., God's Empowering Presence: The Holy Spirit in the Letters of Paul, Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1994.

Findlay, G. G., The Epistles of Paul the Apostle to the Thessalonians, Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1904.

Fiore, B., “The Pastoral Epistles in the Light of Philodemus ‘On Frank Speech’,” in Fitzgerald, J. T. et al. (eds.), Philodemus and the New Testament World, NovTSup 111, Leiden: Brill, 2004, 271–93.

Fitzmyer, J. A., Romans: A New Translation with a Commentary, AB 33, New York: Doubleday, 1993.

Forbes, C., “Ancient Rhetoric and Ancient Letters: Models for Reading Paul, and Their Limits,” in Sampley, J. P. and Lampe, P. (eds.), Paul and Rhetoric, London and New York: T&T Clark, 2010, 143–60.

Fowler, W. W., Social Life at Roman in the Age of Cicero, London: Macmillan, 1916.

Freese, J. H. (trans.), Aristotle: The ‘Art’ of Rhetoric, LCL, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1926.

Friedrich, G., “Der Brief eines Gefangenen,” in Friedrich, J. H. (ed.), Auf das Wort kommt es an: Gesammelte Aufsätze zum 70. Geburtstag Gerhard Friedrich, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1978, 224–35.

Fung, R., The Epistle to the Galatians, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1988.

Furnish, V. P., 1 Thessalonians, 2 Thessalonians, ANTC, Nashville: Abingdon, 2007.

Furnish, V. P., Theology and Ethics in Paul, Nashville: Abingdon, 1968.

Gagarin, M., and MacDowell, D. M. (trans.), Antiphon and Andocides, The Oratory of Classical Greece, Vol. 1, Austin, TX: University of Texas, 1998.

Gamble, H. Y., Books and Readers in the Early Church: A History of Early Christian Texts, New Haven, CT: Yale University, 1995.

Gardiner, E. N., Greek Athletic Sports and Festivals, Oxford: Clarendon, 1955.

Garland, D. E., 2 Corinthians, NAC, Nashville: Broadman, 1999.

Garnsey, P., and Saller, R., The Roman Empire: Economy, Society and Culture, London: Duckworth, 1987.

Garver, E., Aristotle's Rhetoric: An Art of Character, Chicago: University of Chicago, 1994.

Gaventa, B. R., First and Second Thessalonians, Louisville: John Knox, 1998.

Geoghegan, A. T., The Attitude towards Labor in Early Christianity and Ancient Culture, Washington, DC: Catholic University of America, 1945.

Given, M. D., Paul's True Rhetoric: Ambiguity, Cunning, and Deception in Greece and Rome, Harrisburg, PA: Trinity, 2001.

Godley, A. D. (trans.), Herodotus Volume I, LCL, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1960.

Goldstein, J. A., The Letters of Demosthenes, New York: Columbia University, 1968.

Gombis, T. G., “The ‘Transgressor’ and the Curse of the Law: The Logic of Paul's Argument in Gal 2–3,” NTS 53 (2007), 81–97.

Gordley, M. E., The Colossian Hymn in Context: An Exegesis in the Light of Jewish and Greco-Roman Hymnic and Epistolary Conventions, WUNT 2/228, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2007.

Gori, F. (ed.), S. Marii Victorini Opera: Pars Posterior: Opera Exegetica, CSEL 82/2, Vienna: Hoelder-Pichler-Tempsky, 1986.

Gowler, D. B., “Introduction,” in Robbins, V. K. (ed.), New Boundaries in Old Territory, ESEC 3, New York: Peter Lang, 1993, 1–36.

Grams, R., “The Temple Conflict Scene: A Rhetorical Analysis of Matthew 21–33,” in Watson, D. F. (ed.), Persuasive Artistry: Studies in New Testament Rhetoric in Honor of George A. Kennedy, JSNTSup 50, Sheffield: JSOT, 1991, 41–65.

Greenough, J. B., and Kittredge, G. L. (eds.), Select Orations and Letters of Cicero, Boston: Ginn, 1902.

Gwynn, A., Roman Education: From Cicero to Quintilian, New York: Russell & Russell, 1964, orig. 1926.

Hagen, K., Luther's Approach to Scripture as seen in his Commentaries on Galatians 1519–1538, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1993.

Hall, R. G., “Arguing like an Apocalypse: Galatians and an Ancient Topos outside the Greco-Roman Tradition,” NTS 42 (1996), 434–53.

Hall, R. G., “The Reader as Apocalyptist in John,” in Williams, C. H. and Rowland, C. (eds.), John's Gospel and Intimations of Apocalyptic, London: Bloomsbury, 2013, 254–73.

Hall, R. G., “The Rhetorical Outline for Galatians,” JBL 16 (1987), 277–87.

Hansen, G. W., Abraham in Galatians: Epistolary and Rhetorical Context, JSNTSup 29, Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1989.

Hardin, J. K., Galatians and the Imperial Cult: A Critical Analysis of the First-Century Social Context of Paul's Letter, WUNT 2/237, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008.

Harland, P. A., Associations, Synagogues, and Congregations, Minneapolis: Fortress, 2003.

Harnisch, W., “Einübung des neuen Seins: Paulinische Paränese am Beispiel des Galaterbriefes,” Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche 84 (1987), 279–96.

Harris, M. J., The Second Epistle to the Corinthians: A Commentary on the Greek Text, NIGTC, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2005.

Harris, W. V., Ancient Literacy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1989.

Harrison, J. R., “Paul and the Gymnasiarchs: Two Approaches to Pastoral Formation in Antiquity,” in Porter, S. E. (ed.), Paul: Jew, Greek, and Roman, PAST 5, Leiden: Brill, 2008, 141–78.

Hartman, L., “On Reading Others’ Letters,” HTR 79:1–3 (1986), 137–46.

Hays, R. B., “‘The Righteous One’ as Eschatological Deliverer: A Case Study in Paul's Apocalyptic Hermeneutics,” in Marcus, J. and Soards, M. L. (eds.), Apocalyptic and the New Testament: Essays in Honor of J. Louis Martyn, JSNTSup 24, Sheffield: JSOT, 1989, 191–215.

Heath, M., “John Chrysostom, Rhetoric and Galatians,” BibInt 12 (2004), 369–400.

Hellholm, D., “Enthymemic Argumentation in Paul: The Case of Romans 6,” in Engberg-Pedersen, T. (ed.), Paul in His Hellenistic Context, Minneapolis: Fortress, 1995, 119–79.

Hengel, M., Judaism and Hellenism: Studies in Their Encounter in Palestine during the Early Hellenistic Period, Philadelphia: Fortress, 1974.

Hengel, M., Paulus und Jakobus: Kleine Schriften III, WUNT 141, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2002.

Hengel, M., with Deines, R., The Pre-Christian Paul, London: SCM, 1991.

Henrichs, A., “Isokrates-Imitation,” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 1 (1967), 75–6.

Hester, J. D., “Epideictic Rhetoric and Persona in Galatians 1 and 2,” in Nanos, M. D. (ed.), The Galatians Debate: Contemporary Issues in Rhetorical and Historical Interpretation, Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2002, 181–96.

Hester, J. D., “The Invention of 1 Thessalonians,” in Porter, S. E. and Olbricht, T. H. (eds.), Rhetoric, Scripture and Theology: Essays from the 1994 Pretoria Conference, Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1996, 251–61.

Hester, J. D., “The Rhetorical Structure of Galatians 1:11–2:14,” JBL 103 (1984), 224–33.

Hester, J. D., “Rhetorics in and for the New Millennium,” in Hester, J. D. and Hester, J. D. (eds.), Rhetorics in the New Millennium: Promise and Fulfillment, Studies in Antiquity and Christianity, New York and London: T&T Clark, 2010, 1–21.

Hester, J. D., “The Use and Influence of Rhetoric in Galatians 2:1–14,” ThZ 42 (1986), 386–408.

Hester, J. D., and Hester, J. D. (eds.), Rhetorics in the New Millennium: Promise and Fulfillment, Studies in Antiquity and Christianity, New York and London: T&T Clark, 2010.

Hezser, C., Jewish Literacy in Roman Palestine, TSAJ 81, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2001.

Hietanen, M., “The Argumentation in Galatians,” in Tolmie, D. F. (ed.), Exploring New Rhetorical Approaches to Galatians, Acta Theologica S 9, Bloemfontein: University of the Free State, 2007, 99–120.

Hietanen, M., Paul's Argumentation in Galatians: A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis, LNTS 344, London and New York: T&T Clark, 2007.

Hine, H., “The Form and Function of Speech in the Prose Works of the Younger Seneca,” in Berry, D. H. and Erskine, A. (eds.), Form and Function in Roman Oratory, Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2010, 208–24.

Hock, R. F., “Paul's Tentmaking and the Problem of His Social Status,” JBL 97 (1978), 555–64.

Hock, R. F., The Social Context of Paul's Ministry: Tentmaking and Apostleship, Philadelphia: Fortress, 1980.

Holland, G. S., Divine Irony, Selinsgrove, PA: Susquehanna University, 2000.

Holland, G. S., “Playing to the Groundlings: Shakespeare Performance Criticism and Performance Criticism of the Biblical Texts,” Neot 41 (2007), 317–40.

Holland, G. S., “Speaking Like a Fool: Irony in 2 Corinthians 10–13,” in Porter, S. E. and Olbricht, T. H. (eds.), Rhetoric and the New Testament: Essays from the 1992 Heidelberg Conference, JSNTSup 90, Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1993, 250–64.

Holloway, P. A., “Paul's Pointed Prose: The Sententia in Roman Rhetoric and Paul,” NovT 40 (1998), 32–53.

Holloway, P. A., “The Enthymeme as an Element of Style in Paul,” JBL 120 (2001), 329–43.

Holmstrand, J., Markers and Meaning in Paul: An Analysis of 1 Thessalonians, Philippians and Galatians, ConBNT 28, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1997.

Howard, G., Paul: Crisis in Galatia: A Study in Early Christian Theology, SNTSMS 35, Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1979.

Hubbell, H. M. (trans.), Cicero. De inventione, De optimo genere oratorum, Topica, LCL, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1949.

Hübner, H., “Der Galaterbrief und das Verhältnis von antiker Rhetorik und Epistolographie,” Theologische Literaturzeitung 109 (1984), 241–9.

Hughes, F. W., Early Christian Rhetoric and 2 Thessalonians, JSNTSup 30, Sheffield: JSOT, 1989.

Hughes, F. W., “The Rhetoric of 1 Thessalonians,” in Collins, R. F. (ed.), The Thessalonian Correspondence, BETL 87, Leuven: Leuven University, 1990, 94–116.

Hughes, F. W., “The Rhetoric of Letters,” in Donfried, K. P. and Beutler, J. (eds.), The Thessalonians Debate: Methodological Discord or Methodological Synthesis? Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2000, 194–240.

Hurtado, L. W., “Oral Fixation and New Testament Studies? ‘Orality,’ ‘Performance’ and Reading Texts in Early Christianity,” NTS 60 (2014) 321–40.

Jegher-Bucher, V., Der Galaterbrief auf dem Hintergrund antiker Epistolographie und Rhetorik, ATANT 78, Zurich: Theologischer Verlag, 1989.

Jewett, R., Romans: A Commentary, Hermeneia, Minneapolis: Fortress, 2007.

Jewett, R., The Thessalonian Correspondence, FFNT, Philadelphia: Fortress, 1986.

Johanson, B. C., To All the Brethren: A Text-Linguistic and Rhetorical Approach to 1 Thessalonians, ConBNT 16, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1987.

Johnson, W., “Towards a Sociology of Reading in Classical Antiquity,” AJP 121 (2000) 593–627.

Judge, E. A., “Paul's Boasting in Relation to Contemporary Professional Practice,” AusBR 16 (1968), 37–50.

Judge, E. A., The Social Pattern of the Christian Groups in the First Century: Some Prolegomena to the Study of New Testament Ideas of Social Obligation, London: Tyndale, 1960.

Kalimtzis, K., Aristotle on Political Enmity and Disease: An Inquiry into Stasis, Albany, NY: SUNY, 2000.

Kandel, E. R., In Search of Memory: The Emergence of a New Science of Mind, New York: W. W. Norton, 2006.

Käsemann, E., Commentary on Romans, trans. Bromiley, G. W., Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1980.

Kaster, R. A., “Notes on ‘Primary’ and ‘Secondary’ Schools in Late Antiquity,” TAPA 113 (1983), 323–46.

Kaster, R. A., Cicero: Speech on Behalf of Publius Sestius, Clarendon Ancient History Series, Oxford: Clarendon, 2006.

Keck, L. E., “The Jewish Paul among the Gentiles: Two Portrayals,” in Fitzgerald, J. T., Olbricht, T. H., and White, L. M. (eds.), Early Christianity and Classical Culture: Comparative Studies in Honour of Abraham J. Malherbe, NovTSup 110, Leiden: Brill, 2003, 461–81.

Keck, L. E., Romans, ANTC, Nashville: Abingdon, 2005.

Kehoe, D. P., Law and the Rural Economy in the Roman Empire, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 2007.

Kennedy, G. A., The Art of Persuasion in Greece, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, 1963.

Kennedy, G. A., The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World 300 B.C.–A.D. 300, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, 1972.

Kennedy, G. A., Classical Rhetoric and Its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times, 2nd ed., Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, 1999.

Kennedy, G. A., Greek Rhetoric under Christian Emperors, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, 1983.

Kennedy, G. A., A New History of Classical Rhetoric, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, 1994.

Kennedy, G. A., New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, 1984.

Kennedy, G. A., Progymnasmata: Greek Textbooks of Prose Composition and Rhetoric, Writings from the Greco-Roman World 10, Atlanta: SBL, 2003.

Kennedy, G. A. (trans.), Aristotle, On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse, New York: Oxford University, 1991.

Kern, P. H., Rhetoric and Galatians: Assessing an Approach to Paul's Epistles, SNTSMS 101, Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1998.

King, H., “Chronic Pain and the Creation of Narrative,” in Porter, J. L. (ed.), Constructions of the Classical Body, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1999, 252–68.

Kingsley, P., Ancient Philosophy, Mystery, and Magic: Empedocles and Pythagorean Tradition, Oxford: Clarendon, 1995.

Klauck, H.-J., Ancient Letters and the New Testament: A Guide to Context and Exegesis, Waco, TX: Baylor University, 2006.

Klauck, H.-J., Die antike Briefliteratur und das Neue Testament, UTB 222, Paderborn: Schöningh, 1998.

Klauck, H.-J., “Compilations of Letters in Cicero's Correspondence,” in Fitzgerald, J. T., Olbricht, T. H., and White, L. M. (eds.), Early Christianity and Classical Culture: Comparative Studies in Honor of Abraham Malherbe, NovTSup 110, Leiden: Brill, 2003, 131–51.

Klaus, W., “Hab 2,3–4 in der hebräischen und griechischen Texttradition mit einem Ausblick auf das Neue Testament,” in Caulley, T. S. and Lichtenberger, H. (eds.), Die Septuaginta und das fr?he Christentum, WUNT 227, T?bingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011, 153–73.

Kloppenborg, J. L., and Wilson, S. G. (eds.), Voluntary Associations in the Greco-Roman World, New York: Routledge, 1996.

Koch, D.-A., “Der Text von Hab 2:4b in der Septuaginta und im Neuen Testament,” ZNW 76 (1985), 68–85.

Koskenniemi, H., Studien zur Idee und Phraseologie des griechischen Briefes bis 400 n. Chr., Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae B 102.2, Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia, 1956.

Kraftchick, S., “Why Do the Rhetoricians Rage?” in Jennings, T. W. (ed.), Text and Logos: The Humanistic Interpretation of the New Testament, Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1990, 55–79.

Kraus, W., “Hab 2,3–4 in der hebräischen und griechischen Texttradition mit einem Ausblick auf das Neue Testament,” in Caulley, T. S. and Lichtenberger, H. (eds.). Die Septuaginta und das frühe Christentum, WUNT 277, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011, 153–73.

Kraus, W., Das Volk Gotts: Zur Grundlegung der Ekklesiologie bei Paulus, WUNT 85, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1995.

Krause, J., Gefängnisse im römischen Reich, Heidelberger Althistorische Beiträge und Epigraphische Studien, Stuttgart: F. Steiner, 1996.

Kremendahl, D., Die Botschaft der Form: Zum Verhältnis von antiker Epistolographie und Rhetorik im Galaterbrief, NTOA 46, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2000.

Kremmydas, C., “Hellenistic Oratory and the Evidence of Rhetorical Exercises,” in Kremmydas, C. and Tempest, K. (eds.), Hellenistic Oratory: Continuity and Change, Oxford: Oxford University, 2013, 139–63.

Kremmydas, C., “P. Berl. 9781 and the Early Reception of Demosthenes’ against Leptines,” BICS 50 (2007), 19–48.

Kremmydas, C., and Tempest, K., “Introduction: Exploring Hellenistic Oratory,” in Kremmydas, C. and Tempest, K. (eds.), Hellenistic Oratory: Continuity and Change, Oxford: Oxford University, 2013, 1–17.

Krentz, B. E., “Logos or Sophia: The Pauline Use of the Ancient Dispute between Rhetoric and Philosophy,” in Fitzgerald, J. T., Olbricht, T. H., and White, L. M. (eds.), Early Christianity and Classical Culture: Comparative Studies in Honour of Abraham J. Malherbe, NovTSup 110, Leiden: Brill, 2003, 277–90.

Kruse, C. G., Paul's Letter to the Romans, PNTC, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2012.

Kümmel, W. G., Römer 7 und das Bild des Menschen im Neuen Testament; Zwei Studien, rev. ed., Munich: C. Kaiser, 1974.

Kurzweil, R., How to Create a Mind: The Secret of Human Thought Revealed, New York: Viking, 2012.

Kuula, K., The Law, the Covenant and God's Plan, 2 vols., Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1999–2003.

Kwon, Y., Eschatology in Galatians: Rethinking Paul's Response to the Crisis in Galatia, WUNT 2/183, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2004.

Lambrecht, J., Second Corinthians, SPS, Collegeville, MN: Liturgical, 1999.

Lambrecht, J., The Wretched “I” and Its Liberation: Paul in Romans 7 and 8, LTPM 14, Louvain: Peeters, 1992.

Lampe, P., “Rhetorical Analysis of Pauline Texts – Quo Vadit? Methodological Reflections,” in Sampley, J. P. and Lampe, P. (eds.), Paul and Rhetoric, London and New York: T&T Clark, 2010, 3–21.

Lategan, B., “Is Paul Defending His Apostleship in Galatians? The Function of Galatians 1.11–12 and 2.19–20 in the Development of Paul's Argument,” NTS 34 (1988), 411–30.

Lausberg, H., Elemente der literarischen Rhetorik, Munich: Hüber, 1963.

Lausberg, H., Handbook of Literary Rhetoric: A Foundation for Literary Study, trans. and ed. Orton, D. E. and Anderson, R. D., Leiden: Brill, 1998.

Lausberg, H., Handbuch der literarischen Rhetorik: Eine Grundlegung der Literaturwissenschaft, 2 vols., Munich: Hüber, 1960.

Lecourt, D., “Introduction,” in Prochiantz, A. (ed.), La construction du cerveau, Paris: Hachette, 1989, 1–17.

Lefkowitz, M. R., Greek Gods, Human Lives: What We Can Learn from Myths, New Haven, CT: Yale University, 2003.

Lemmer, R., “Why Should the Possibility of Rabbinic Rhetorical Elements in Pauline Writings (e.g. Galatians) Be Reconsidered?” in Porter, S. E. and Olbricht, T. H. (eds.), Rhetoric, Scripture and Theology: Essays from the 1994 Pretoria Conference, Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1996, 161–79.

Levison, J. R., “Did the Spirit Inspire Rhetoric? An Exploration of George Kennedy's Definition of Early Christian Rhetoric,” in Watson, D. F. (ed.), Persuasive Artistry: Studies in New Testament Rhetoric in Honor of George A. Kennedy, JSNTSup 50, Sheffield: JSOT, 1991, 25–40.

Lewis, N. (ed.), The Documents from the Bar Kokhba Period in the Cave of Letters: Greek Papyri, Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Shrine of the Book, 1989.

Lightfoot, J. B., Notes on the Epistles of Paul, London: Macmillan, 1895.

Litfin, D. A., St. Paul's Theology of Proclamation: 1 Corinthians 1–4 and Greco-Roman Rhetoric, SNTSMS 79, Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1994.

Livingston, K. R., Andrews, J. K., and Harnad, S., “Categorical Perception Effects Induced by Category Learning,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998), 732–53.

Lloyd-Jones, H. (ed. and trans.), Sophocles, Ajax, Electra, Oedipus Tyrannus, LCL, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1994.

Longenecker, R. N., The Christology of Early Jewish Christianity, SBT 2.17, Naperville, IL: A. R. Allenson, 1970.

Longenecker, R. N., Galatians, WBC 41, Dallas: Word, 1990.

Lüdemann, G., The Earliest Christian Text: 1 Thessalonians, Salem, OR: Polebridge, 2013.

Lüderitz, G., “Rhetorik, Poetik: Kompositionstechnik im Markusevangelium,” in Cancik, H. (ed.), Markusphilologie: Historische, literaturgeschichtliche und stilistische Untersuchungen zum zweiten Evangelium, WUNT 33, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1984, 165–203.

Mack, B. L., Rhetoric and the New Testament, GBSNT, Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress, 1990.

Mack, P., A History of Renaissance Rhetoric 1380–1620, Oxford: Oxford University, 2011.

MacMullen, R., Roman Social Relations: 50 B.C. to A.D. 284, New Haven, CT: Yale University, 1974.

Maio, A. (ed.), Dionysii Halicarnassensis Opera Omnia, Vol. 6, Leipzig: Caroli Tauchnitil, 1829.

Malcolm, M. R., Paul and the Rhetoric of Reversal in 1 Corinthians: The Impact of Paul's Gospel on His Macro-Rhetoric, SNTSMS 155, Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2013.

Malherbe, A. J., Ancient Epistolary Theorists, SBLSBS 19, Atlanta: Scholars, 1988.

Malherbe, A. J., “Exhortations in First Thessalonians,” NovT 25 (1983), 238–56.

Malherbe, A. J., The Letters to the Thessalonians, AB 32b, New Haven, CT: Yale University, 2000.

Malherbe, A. J., Moral Exhortation, A Greco-Roman Sourcebook, Philadelphia: Westminster, 1986.

Malherbe, A. J., Paul and the Popular Philosophers, Minneapolis: Fortress, 1989.

Malherbe, A. J., Paul and the Thessalonians: The Philosophical Tradition of Pastoral Care, Philadelphia: Fortress, 1987.

Malherbe, A. J., “Paul: Hellenistic Philosopher or Christian Pastor?” American Theological Library Association Proceedings 39 (1985), 86–98.

Malherbe, A. J., “Paul's Self-Sufficiency (Philippians 4:11),” in Fornberg, T. and Hellholm, D. (eds.), Texts and Contexts: Biblical Texts in Their Textual and Situational Contexts: Essays in Honor of Lars Hartman, Oslo: Scandinavian University, 1995, 813–26.

Malina, B. J., The New Testament World: Insights from Cultural Anthropology, 3rd ed., Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2001.

Marrou, H. I., A History of Education in Antiquity, trans. Lamb, G., New York: Sheed and Ward, 1956.

Marshall, P., Enmity in Corinth: Social Conventions in Paul's Relations with the Corinthians, WUNT 2/23, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1987.

Martin, D. B., The Corinthian Body, New Haven, CT: Yale University, 1999.

Martin, D. B., Sex and the Single Savior, Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2006.

Martin, T. W., “Apostasy to Paganism: The Rhetorical Stasis of the Galatian Controversy,” JBL 114 (1995), 437–61.

Martin, T. W., “Hans Dieter Betz: Ur-ancestor of New Testament Rhetorical Criticism,” in Martin, T. W. (ed.), Genealogies of Rhetorical Criticism, Minneapolis: Fortress, 2015, 13–44.

Martin, T. W., “Invention and Arrangement in Recent Pauline Rhetorical Studies: A Survey of the Practices and the Problems,” in Sampley, J. P. and Lampe, P. (eds.), Paul and Rhetoric, London and New York: Continuum, 2010, 48–118.

Martin, T. W., “Investigating the Pauline Letter Body,” in Porter, S. E. and Adams, S. A. (eds.), Paul and the Ancient Letter Form, PAST 6, Leiden: Brill, 2010, 185–212.

Martyn, J. L., Galatians, AB 33A, New York: Doubleday, 1997.

Matera, F. J., Galatians, Collegeville, MN: Liturgical, 1992.

Mayordomo, M., Argumentiert Paulus logisch? WUNT 188, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2005.

McKerrow, R. E., “Critical Rhetoric: Theory and Praxis,” Communication Monographs 56 (1989), 91–111.

McRay, J., Paul: His Life and Teaching, Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2003.

Meiser, M., Galater, Novum Testamentum Biblicum 9, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2007.

Mendelson, A., Secular Education in Philo of Alexandria, Cincinnati: Hebrew Union College, 1982.

Mengel, B., Studien zum Philipperbrief: Untersuchungen zum situativen Kontext under besonderer Berücksichtigung der Frage nach der Ganzheitlichkeit oder Einheitlichkeit eines paulinischen Briefes, WUNT 2/8, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1982.

Metzger, B. M., Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration, 2nd ed., New York: Oxford University, 1968.

Meyer, P. W., “Review of Galatians: A Commentary on Paul's Letter to the Churches in Galatia by H. D. Betz,” RSR 7 (1981), 318–22.

Meynet, R., L’Évangile selon Saint Luc: Analyse rhétorique I-II, Paris: Cerf, 1988.

Meynet, R., “Quelle rhétorique dans l’épître aux Galates: Le cas de Ga 4,12–20,” Rhetorica 12 (1994), 427–50.

Meynet, R., Rhetorical Analysis: An Introduction to Biblical Rhetoric, Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1998, English translation: L'analyse rhétorique: Une nouvelle méthode pour comprendre la Bible. Textes fondateurs et exposé systématique, Paris: Cerf, 1989.

Michaelis, W., “σκηνοποιός,” TDNT 7 (1971), 393–4.

Mihaila, C., The Paul-Apollos Relationship and Paul's Stance toward Greco-Roman Rhetoric: An Exegetical and Socio-Historical Study of 1 Corinthians 1–4, LNTS 402, London: T&T Clark, 2009.

Millard, A., Reading and Writing in the Time of Jesus, Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 2000.

Millender, E. G., “Spartan Literacy Revisited,” ClAnt 20 (2001), 121–64.

Mills, W. E., An Index to Periodical Literature on the Apostle Paul, NTTS 16, Leiden: Brill, 1993.

Mitchell, M. M., The Heavenly Trumpet: John Chrysostom and the Art of Pauline Interpretation, Louisville: Westminster/John Knox, 2002.

Mitchell, M. M., “New Testament Envoys in the Context of Greco-Roman Diplomatic and Epistolary Conventions: The Example of Timothy and Titus,” JBL 111 (1992), 641–62.

Mitchell, M. M., Paul and the Rhetoric of Reconciliation: An Exegetical Investigation of the Language and Composition of 1 Corinthians, Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 1993.

Mitchell, M. M., “Reading Rhetoric with Patristic Exegetes,” in Collins, A. and Mitchell, M. M. (eds.), Antiquity and Humanity: Essays in Ancient Religion and Philosophy Presented to Hans Dieter Betz on His 70th Birthday, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2001, 333–55.

Mitchell, M. M., “Rhetorical Shorthand in Pauline Argumentation: The Functions of ‘the Gospel’ in the Corinthian Correspondence,” in Jervis, L. A. and Richardson, P. (eds.), Gospel in Paul: Studies on Corinthians, Galatians, and Romans for Richard N. Longenecker, Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1994, 63–88.

Mitternacht, D., Forum für Sprachlose: Eine kommunikationspsychologische und epistolär-rhetorische Untersuchung des Galaterbriefes, ConBNT 30, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1999.

Monteil, J., and Huguet, P. (eds.), Social Context and Cognitive Performance: Towards a Social Psychology of Cognition, European Monographs in Social Psychology, Hove, UK: Psychology Press, 1999.

Moo, D. The Epistle to the Romans, NICNT, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1996.

Morgan, T., “Literate Education in Classical Athens,” CQ 49 (1999), 46–61.

Morgan, T., Literate Education in the Hellenistic and Roman Worlds, Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1998.

Morgan, T., “Rhetoric and Education,” in Worthington, I. (ed.), A Companion to Greek Rhetoric, Oxford: Blackwell, 2010, 303–19.

Morland, K. A., The Rhetoric of Curse in Galatians: Paul Confronts Another Gospel, ESEC, Atlanta: Scholars, 1995.

Muilenburg, J., “Form Criticism and Beyond,” JBL 88 (1969), 1–18.

Mullen, A., and James, P. (eds.), Multilingualism in the Graeco-Roman Worlds, Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2012.

Murphy-O'Connor, J., Paul: A Critical Life, Oxford: Oxford University, 1996.

Murphy-O'Connor, J., Paul the Letter-Writer: His World, His Options, His Skills, GNS 41, Collegeville, MN: Liturgical, 1995.

Nanos, M. D., The Irony of Galatians: Paul's Letter in First-Century Context, Minneapolis: Fortress, 2002.

Nanos, M. D., The Mystery of Romans, Minneapolis: Fortress, 1996.

Neyrey, J., “The Social Location of Paul: Education as the Key,” in Gowler, D. B., Bloomquist, L. G., and Watson, D. F. (eds.), Fabrics of Discourse: Essays in Honor of Vernon K. Robbins, Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International, 2003, 126–64.

Nikolakopoulos, K., “Aspekte der paulinischen Ironie am Beispiel des Galaterbriefes,” Biblische Zeitschrift 45 (2001), 193–208.

Oakes, P., Philippians: From People to Letter, SNTSMS 110, Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2001.

Oegema, G. S., Für Israel und die Völker: Studien zum alttestamentlichen-jüdischen Hintergrund der paulinischen Theologie, NovTSup 95, Leiden: Brill, 1999.

Olbricht, T. H., “An Aristotelian Rhetorical Analysis of 1 Thessalonians,” in Balch, D., Ferguson, E., and Meeks, W. (eds.), Greeks, Romans and Christians: Essays in Honor of A. J. Malherbe, Minneapolis: Fortress, 1990, 216–36.

Olbricht, T. H., “Aristotle and Aristotelianism,” in Evans, C. A. and Porter, S. E. (eds.), Dictionary of New Testament Background, Downers Grove, IL: IVP, 2000, 119–21.

Olbricht, T. H., “The Foundations of Ethos in Paul and in the Classical Rhetoricians,” in Olbricht, T. H. and Eriksson, A. (eds.), Rhetoric, Ethic, and Moral Persuasion in Biblical Discourse: Heidelberg Conference 2002, ESEC 11, New York: T&T Clark, 2005, 138–59.

Olbricht, T. H., “The Rhetoric in Biblical Commentaries,” CBR 7 (2008), 11–36.

Olbricht, T. H., “The Rhetoric of Colossians,” in Porter, S. E. and Olbricht, T. H. (eds.), Rhetoric, Theology and the Scriptures: Essays from the 1994 Pretoria Conference, JSNTSup 131, Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1995, 308–28.

Palme, B., “Schreibkultur und Schriftlichkeit,” in Lange, A. and Palme, B. (eds.), Kinder Abrahams: Die Bibel in Judentum, Christentum und Islam, Vienna: Phoibos, 2014, 11–18.

Parks, E. P., The Roman Rhetorical Schools as a Preparation for the Courts under the Early Empire, JHUSHPS 63/2, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, 1945.

Perelman, C., The Realm of Rhetoric, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame, 1990.

Perelman, C., and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L., The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation, trans. Wilkinson, J. and Weaver, P., Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame, 1969.

Peterson, B. K., Eloquence and the Proclamation of the Gospel in Corinth, Atlanta: Scholars, 1998.

Pinker, S., How the Mind Works, New York: W. W. Norton, 1997.

Pitta, A., Disposizione e messaggio della lettera ai Galati: Analisi retorico-letteraria, AnBib 131, Rome: Gregorian Biblical Bookshop, 1992.

Pitts, A. W., “Hellenistic Schools in Jerusalem and Paul's Rhetorical Education,” in Porter, S. E. (ed.), Paul's World, PAST 4, Leiden: Brill, 2008, 19–50.

Pitts, A. W., “Tarsus or Jerusalem? A Syntactic Argument for Tarsus as the City of Paul’s Youth in Acts 22:3,” Filología Neotestamentaria 27 (2014), 75–81.

Pogoloff, S. M., Logos and Sophia: The Rhetorical Situation of 1 Corinthians, SBLDS 134, Atlanta: Scholars, 1992.

Polhill, J. B., Paul and His Letters, Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 1999.

Porter, S. E., “Applied Rhetoric and Stylistics in Ancient Greece,” in Fix, U., Gardt, A., and Knape, J. (eds.), Rhetorik und Stilistik/Rhetoric and Stylistics: Ein internationals Handbuch historischer und systematischer Forschung/An International Handbook of Historical and Systematic Research, Vol. 1, Berlin: de Gruyter, 2008, 284–307.

Porter, S. E., “Did Paul Speak Latin?” in Porter, S. E. (ed.), Paul: Jew, Greek, and Roman, PAST 5, Leiden: Brill, 2008, 289–308.

Porter, S. E., “A Functional Letter Perspective: Towards a Grammar of Epistolary Form,” in Porter, S. E. and Adams, S. A. (eds.), Paul and the Ancient Letter Form, PAST 6, Leiden: Brill, 2010, 9–32.

Porter, S. E., “Hellenistic Oratory and Paul of Tarsus,” in Kremmydas, C. and Tempest, K. (eds.), Hellenistic Oratory: Continuity and Change, Oxford: Oxford University, 2013, 319–60.

Porter, S. E., “The Languages That Paul Did Not Speak,” in Porter, S. E. (ed.), Paul's World, PAST 4, Leiden: Brill, 2008, 131–50.

Porter, S. E., “Paul and His Bible: His Education and Access to the Scriptures of Israel,” in Porter, S. E. and Stanley, C. D. (eds.), As It Is Written: Studying Paul's Use of Scipture, SBLSymS 50, Atlanta: SBL, 2008, 97–124.

Porter, S. E., “Paul as Epistolographer and Ancient Rhetorician?” in Porter, S. E. and Stamps, D. L. (eds.), The Rhetorical Interpretation of Scripture, JSNTSup 180, Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1999, 222–48.

Porter, S. E., “Paul of Tarsus and His Letters,” in Porter, S. E. (ed.), Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period 330 B.C.–A.D. 400, Leiden: Brill, 1997, 533–85.

Porter, S. E., “The Theoretical Justification for the Application of Rhetorical Categories to Pauline Epistolary Literature,” in Porter, S. E. and Olbricht, T. H. (eds.), Rhetoric and the New Testament: Essays from the 1992 Heidelberg Conference, Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1993, 100–22.

Porter, S. E., Verbal Aspect in the Greek of the New Testament: With Reference to Tense and Mood, Studies in Biblical Greek 1, New York: Peter Lang, 1989.

Porter, S. E., and Dyer, B. R., “Oral Texts? A Reassessment of the Oral and Rhetorical Nature of Paul's Letters in Light of Recent Studies,” JETS 55.2 (2012), 323–41.

Porter, S. E., and Pitts, A. W., “Paul's Bible, His Education, and His Access to the Scriptures of Israel,” JGRChJ 5 (2008), 9–41.

Porter, S. E., and Olbricht, T. H. (eds.), Rhetoric and the New Testament: Essays from the 1992 Heidelberg Conference, Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1993.

Porter, S. E. (eds.), Rhetoric, Scripture and Theology: Essays from the 1994 Pretoria Conference, Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1996.

Porter, S. E. (eds.), The Rhetorical Analysis of Scripture: Essays from the 1995 London Conference, Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1997.

Porter, S. E., and Stamps, D. L. (eds.), The Rhetorical Interpretation of Scripture: Essays from the 1996 Malibu Conference, Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1999.

Porter, S. E. (eds.), Rhetorical Criticism and the Bible: Essays from the 1998 Florence Conference, Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 2002.

Poster, C., “A Conversation Halved: Epistolary Theory in Greco-Roman Antiquity,” in Poster, C. and Mitchell, L. C. (eds.), Letter-Writing Manuals and Instruction from Antiquity to the Present: Historical and Bibliographic Studies, Columbia: University of South Carolina, 2007, 21–51.

Poster, C., “The Economy of Letter Writing in Graeco-Roman Antiquity,” in Eriksson, A., Olbricht, T. H., and Übelacker, W. (eds.), Rhetorical Argumentation in Biblical Texts: Essays from the Lund 2000 Conference, ESEC, Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International, 2002, 112–24.

Poster, C., “A Historicist Recontextualization of the Enthymeme,” Rhetorical Society Quarterly 22 (1992), 1–24.

Prior, M., Paul the Letter-Writer and the Second Letter to Timothy, JSNTSup 23, Sheffield: JSOT, 1989.

Probst, H., Paulus und der Brief: Die Rhetorik des antiken Briefes als Form der paulinischen Korintherkorrespondenz (I Kor 8–10), WUNT 2/45, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1991.

Radermacher, L., Artium Scriptores (Reste der voraristotelischen Rhetorik), Vienna: Rohrer, 1951.

Räisänen, H., Paul and the Law, WUNT 29, 2nd ed., Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1986.

Ramsay, W. M., The Cities of St. Paul: Their Influence on His Life and Thought, repr., Grand Rapids: Baker, 1949.

Ramsay, W. M., St. Paul the Traveler and Roman Citizen, rev. Wilson, M., Grand Rapids: Kregel, 2001.

Rapa, R. K., The Meaning of ‘Works of Law’ in Galatians and Romans, SBL 31, New York: Peter Lang, 2001.

Rapske, B., The Book of Acts in Its First Century Setting, Vol. 3: The Book of Acts and Paul in Roman Custody, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1994.

Raspanti, G. (ed.), S. Hieronymi Presbyteri Opera. I: Exegetica 6; Commentarii in Epistulam ad Galatas, CChr. SL 77A, Tournot: Brepols, 2006.

Rastoin, M., Tarse et Jérusalem: La double culture de l'Apôtre Paul en Galates, AnBib 152, Rome: E.P.I.B., 2003.

Reed, J. T., “The Epistle,” in Porter, S. E. (ed.), Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period 330 B.C.–A.D. 400, Leiden: Brill, 1993, 171–93.

Reed, J. T, “Using Ancient Categories to Interpret Paul's Letters: A Question of Genre,” in Porter, S. E. and Olbricht, T. H. (eds.), Rhetoric and the New Testament: Essays from the 1992 Heidelberg Conference, Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1993, 292–324.

Richards, E. R., The Secretary in the Letters of Paul, WUNT 2/42, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1991.

Ricoeur, P., “L'idéologie et l'utopie: Deux expressions de l'imaginaire social,” Autres Temps 2 (1984), 53–64.

Robbins, V. K., “By Land and by Sea: The We-Passages and Ancient Sea Voyages,” in Talbert, C. H. (ed.), Perspectives on Luke-Acts, Perspectives in Religious Studies, Special Studies 5, Danville, VA: Association of Baptist Professors of Religion, 1978, 215–42.

Robbins, V. K., “Conceptual Blending and Early Christian Imagination,” in Luomanen, P., Pyysiäinen, I., and Uro, R. (eds.), Explaining Christian Origins and Early Judaism: Contributions from Cognitive and Social Science, BINS 89, Leiden: Brill, 2005, 161–95.

Robbins, V. K., “The Dialectical Nature of Early Christian Discourse,” Scriptura 59 (1996), 353–62.

Robbins, V. K., Exploring the Texture of Texts: A Guide to Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation, Valley Forge, PA: Trinity Press International, 1996.

Robbins, V. K., The Invention of Christian Discourse. Vol. 1: Rhetoric of Religious Antiquity, Blandford Forum, Dorset, UK: Deo, 2009.

Robbins, V. K., Jesus the Teacher: A Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation of Mark, 2nd ed., Philadelphia: Fortress, 1992.

Robbins, V. K., “The Rhetorical Full-Turn in Biblical Interpretation: Reconfiguring Rhetorical-Political Analysis,” in Porter, S. E. and Stamps, D. L. (eds.), Rhetorical Criticism and the Bible: Essays from the 1998 Florence Conference, Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 2002, 48–60.

Robbins, V. K., “Socio-Rhetorical Criticism: Mary, Elizabeth and the Magnificat as a Test Case,” in Malbon, E. S. and McKnight, E. V. (eds.), The New Literary Criticism and the New Testament, JSNTSup 109, Sheffield: JSOT, 1994, 164–209.

Robbins, V. K., The Tapestry of Early Christian Discourse: Rhetoric, Society and Ideology, London: Routledge, 1996.

Roberts, W. R., Demetrius on Style: The Greek Text of Demetrius De Elucutione Edited after the Paris Manuscript with Introduction, Translation, Facsimile, etc., Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1902.

Robinson, D. W. Jr. (trans.), On Christian Doctrine: St. Augustine, Library of Liberal Arts, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1958.

Roese, N. J., “Counterfactual Thinking,” Psychological Bulletin 121 (1997), 133–48.

Roese, N. J., and Olson, J. M., What Might Have Been: The Social Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1995.

Roetzel, C. J., The Letters of Paul: Conversations in Context, 4th ed., Louisville: John Knox, 1998.

Rohrbaugh, R. L. (ed.), The Social Sciences and New Testament Interpretation, Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1996.

Romanello, S., “La dispositio della Lettera ai Galati e la sua rilvenanza teologica: Saggio di metodologia retorico-letteraria,” Rivista Biblica 47 (1999), 139–73.

Roska, B., and Werblin, F., “Vertical Interactions across Ten Parallel, Stacked Representations in the Mammalian Retina,” Nature 410 (2001), 583–7.

Ross, W. D. (ed.), Ars Rhetorica, SCBO, Oxford: Clarendon, 1959.

Rostovtzeff, M., Social and Economic History of the Roman Empire, 2 vols., Oxford: Clarendon, 1957.

Rothschild, C. K., Luke-Acts and the Rhetoric of History: An Investigation of Early Christian Historiography, WUNT 2/175, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2004.

Russell, D. A., Greek Declamation, Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1983.

Russell, W. B., The Flesh/Spirit Conflict in Galatians, Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1997.

Safrai, S., “Education and the Study of the Torah,” in Safrai, S. (ed.), The Jewish People in the First Century: Historical Geography, Political History, Social, Cultural, and Religious Life and Institutions, CRINT 1.2, Philadelphia: Fortress, 1976, 943–70.

Sampley, J. P., “Paul's Frank Speech with the Galatians and Romans,” in Fitzgerald, J. T. et al. (eds.), Philodemus and the New Testament World, NovTSup 111, Leiden: Brill, 2004, 295–321.

Sanders, E. P., Paul and Palestinian Judaism: A Comparison of Patterns of Religion, Philadelphia: Fortress, 1977.

Sänger, D., “Vergeblich bemüht (Gal. 4,11)? Zur paulinischen Argumentationsstrategie im Galaterbrief,” NTS 48 (2002), 377–99.

Sarna, N., Genesis: The Traditional Hebrew Text with New JPS Translation/Commentary, Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1989.

Schäfer, R., Paulus bis zum Apostelkonzil: Ein Beitrag zur Einleitung in den Galaterbrief, zur Geschichte der Jesusbewegung und zur Pauluschronologie, WUNT 2/179, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2004.

Schauf, S., “Galatians in Context,” NTS 52 (2006), 86–101.

Schellenberg, R. S., Rethinking Paul's Rhetorical Education: Comparative Rhetoric and 2 Corinthians 10–13, ECL, Atlanta: SBL, 2013.

Schellenberg, R. S., “τὸ ἐν λόγῳ ἰδιωτικὸν τοῦ Ἀποστόλου: Revisiting Patristic Testimony on Paul's Rhetorical Education,” NovT 54 (2012), 354–68.

Schewe, S., Die Galater zurückgewinnen: Paulinische Strategien in Galater 5 und 6, FRLANT 208, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2005.

Schnelle, U., Apostle Paul: His Life and Theology, trans. Boring, M. E., Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2003.

Schnider, F., and Stenger, W., Studien zum Neutestamentlichen Briefformular, NTTS 11, Leiden: Brill, 1987.

Schoon-Janssen, J., Umstrittene ‘Apologien’ in den Paulusbriefen: Studien zur rhetorischen Situation des 1. Thessalonicherbriefes, des Galaterbriefes und des Philipperbriefes, GTA 45, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1991.

Schreiner, T., Romans, BECNT, Grand Rapids: Baker, 1998.

Schubert, P., “Form and Function of the Pauline Letters,” JR 19 (1939), 365–77.

Schubert, P., Form and Function of the Pauline Thanksgivings, BZNW 20, Berlin: Alfred Töpelmann, 1939.

Schüssler Fiorenza, E., Rhetoric and Ethic: The Politics of Biblical Studies, Minneapolis: Fortress, 1999.

Schweizer, E., Theologische Einleitung in das Neue Testament, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1989.

Scott, J. M., Paul and the Nations: The Old Testament and Jewish Background to Paul's Mission to the Nations with Special Reference to the Destination of Galatians, WUNT 84, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1995.

Scroggs, R., “Paul as Rhetorician: Two Homilies in Romans 1–11,” in Hamerton-Kelly, R. G. and Scroggs, R. (eds.), Jews, Greeks and Christians: Religious Cultures in Late Antiquity: Essays in Honor of William David Davies, Leiden: Brill, 1976, 271–98.

Seifrid, M., “The Subject of Rom 7:14–25,” NovT 34 (1992), 313–33.

Sensing, T., “Toward a Definition of Paraensis,” Restoration Quarterly 38 (1996), 145–58.

Sherwin-White, A. N., Roman Citizenship, Oxford: Clarendon, 1973.

Shore, B., Culture in Mind: Cognition, Culture, and the Problem of Meaning, Oxford: Oxford University, 1996.

Siegert, F., Argumentation bei Paulus: Gezeigt an Röm 9–11, WUNT 34, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1985.

Smit Sibinga, J., “Exploring the Composition of Matth. 5–7: The Sermon on the Mount and Some of Its ‘Structures’,” Filología Neotestamentaria 7 (1994), 175–96.

Smit, J., “The Letter of Paul to the Galatians: A Deliberative Speech,” NTS 35 (1989), 1–26.

Smith, D. E., From Symposium to Eucharist, Minneapolis: Fortress, 2003.

Smyth, H. W., Greek Grammar, rev. Messing, G. M., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1984.

Snyman, A. H., “On Studying the Figures (schemata) in the New Testament,” Bib 69 (1988), 93–107.

Stambaugh, J. E., and Balch, D. L., The New Testament in Its Social Environment, LEC 2, Philadelphia: Westminster, 1986.

Stamps, D. L., “Rethinking the Rhetorical Situation: The Entextualization of the Situation in the New Testament Epistles,” in Porter, S. E. and Olbricht, T. H. (eds.), Rhetoric and the New Testament: Essays from the 1992 Heidelberg Conference, Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1993, 193–210.

Stanley, C. D., “Paul's ‘Use’ of Scripture: Why the Audience Matters,” in Porter, S. E. and Stanley, C. D. (eds.), As It Is Written: Studying Paul's Use of Scipture, SBLSymS 50, Atlanta: SBL, 2008, 125–55.

Stegemann, E. W., and Stegemann, W., The Jesus Movement: A Social History of Its First Century, trans. Dean, O. C., Minneapolis: Fortress, 2001.

Stirewalt, M. L. Jr., Studies in Ancient Greek Epistolography, SBLRBS 27, Atlanta: Scholars, 1993.

Stowers, S. K., “Apostrophe, προσωποποιΐα and Paul's Rhetorical Education,” in Fitzgerald, J. T., Olbricht, T. H., and White, L. M. (eds.), Early Christianity and Classical Culture: Comparative Studies in Honour of Abraham J. Malherbe, NovTSup 110, Leiden: Brill, 2003, 351–69.

Stowers, S. K., The Diatribe and Paul's Letter to the Romans, SBLDS 57, Chico, CA: Scholars, 1981.

Stowers, S. K., Letter Writing in Greco-Roman Antiquity, LEC 5, Philadelphia: Westminster, 1986.

Stowers, S. K., A Rereading of Romans: Justice, Jews, and Gentiles, New Haven, CT: Yale University, 1994.

Stowers, S. K., “Romans 7.7–25 as a Speech-in-Character (προσωποποιία),” in Engberg-Pedersen, T. (ed.), Paul in His Hellenistic Context, Minneapolis: Fortress, 1995, 180–202.

Strachan, R. H., The Second Epistle of Paul to the Corinthians, MNTC, London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1935.

Strecker, G., Literaturgeschichte des Neuen Testaments, UTB 1682, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1992.

Sussman, L. A., The Elder Seneca, Leiden: Brill, 1978.

Taylor, W. F. Jr., Paul, Apostle to the Nations: An Introduction, Minneapolis: Fortress, 2012.

Taylor, J. W., “From Faith to Faith: Romans 1.17 in the Light of Greek Idiom,” NTS 50 (2004), 337–48.

Tempest, K. L., “Cicero and the Art of dispositio: The Structure of the Verrines,” Leeds International Classical Studies 6.02 (2007), 1–25.

Theißen, G., “Judentum und Christentum bei Paulus: Sozialgeschichtliche Überlegungen zu einem beginnenden Schisma,” in Hengel, M. and Heckel, U. (eds.), Paulus und das antike Judentum, WUNT 58, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1991, 331–59.

Thielman, F., “God’s Righteousness as God’s Fairness in Romans 1:17: An Ancient Perspective on a Significant Phrase,” JETS 54 (2011), 35–48.

Thomas, R., Literacy and Orality in Ancient Greece, Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1992.

Thompson, J. W., Moral Formation According to Paul: The Context and Coherence of Pauline Ethics, Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2011.

Thompson, J. W., Pastoral Ministry According to Paul: A Biblical Vision, Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2006.

Thornton, J., “Oratory in Polybius’ Histories,” in Kremmydas, C. and Tempest, K. (eds.), Hellenistic Oratory: Continuity and Change, Oxford: Oxford University, 2013, 21–42.

Thorsteinsson, R. M., “Epistolography (Ancient Letters),” in Matthews, C. R. (ed.), Oxford Bibliographies in Biblical Studies, New York: Oxford University, forthcoming.

Thorsteinsson, R. M., Paul's Interlocutor in Romans 2: Functions and Identity in the Context of Ancient Epistolography, ConBNT 40, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 2003.

Thurén, J., “Ett brev till Efesos,” in Lepajõe, M. and Gross, A. (eds.), Mille anni sicut dies hesterna … : Studia in Honorem Kalle Kasemaa, Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus, 2003, 156–62.

Thurén, L., “The Antagonists: Rhetorically Marginalized Identities in the New Testament,” in Holmberg, B. and Winninge, M. (eds.), Identity Formation in the New Testament, WUNT 227, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008, 79–95.

Thurén, L., Argument and Theology in 1 Peter: The Origins of Christian Paraenesis, JSNTSup 114, Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1995.

Thurén, L., “‘By Means of Hyperbole’ (1 Cor 12:31b),” in Olbricht, T. H. and Sumney, J. (eds.), Paul and Pathos, SBLSS 16, Atlanta: SBL, 2001, 97–113.

Thurén, L., “The Corinthian Heresies Revisited: A Rhetorical Perspective to the Historical Situation,” in Papadopoulos, S. et al. (eds.), Saint Paul and Corinth: 1950 Years since the Writing of the Epistles to the Corinthians, vol. 2, Athens: Psychogios, 2009, 777–88.

Thurén, L., Derhetorizing Paul: A Dynamic Perspective on Pauline Theology and the Law, WUNT 124, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000.

Thurén, L., “Fighting against Straw Men: Derhetorizing Theology and History in Paul,” in Aejmelaeus, L. and Mustakallio, A. (eds.), The Nordic Paul: Finnish Approaches to Pauline Theology, LNTS 374, London: T&T Clark 2008, 195–208.

Thurén, L., “Hey Jude! Asking for the Original Situation and Message of a Catholic Epistle,” NTS 43 (1997), 451–65.

Thurén, L., “Is There Biblical Argumentation?” in Eriksson, A., Olbricht, T. H., and Übelacker, W. (eds.), Rhetorical Argumentation in Biblical Texts, Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International, 2002, 77–92.

Thurén, L., “John Chrysostom as a Rhetorical Critic – The Hermeneutics of an Early Father,” BibInt 9 (2001), 180–218.

Thurén, L., “Paul Had No Antagonists,” in Mustakallio, A. (ed.), Lux Humana, Lux Aeterna: Essays on Biblical and Related Themes in Honour of Lars Aejmelaeus, Helsinki: Finnish Exegetical Society, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2005, 268–88.

Thurén, L., “Rhetoric and Argumentation in the Letters of Paul,” in Matlock, R. B. (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Pauline Studies, Oxford: Oxford University, forthcoming.

Thurén, L., The Rhetorical Strategy of 1 Peter with Special Regard to Ambiguous Expressions, Åbo: Åbo Academy, 1990.

Thurén, L., “Risky Rhetoric in James?” NovT 37 (1995), 262–84.

Thurén, L., “Romans 7 Derhetorized,” in Porter, S. E. and Stamps, D. L. (eds.), Rhetorical Criticism and the Bible, Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 2002, 420–40.

Thurén, L., “Style Never Goes out of Fashion,” in Porter, S. E. and Olbricht, T. H. (eds.), Rhetoric, Scripture and Theology: Essays from the 1994 Pretoria Conference, Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1996, 329–47.

Thurén, L., “Was Paul Sincere? Questioning the Apostle's Ethos,” Scriptura 65 (1998), 95–108.

Thurén, L., “Where Is Rhetorical Criticism Taking Us Now?” in Back, S. and Kankaanniemi, M. (eds.), Voces Clamantium in Deserto: Essays in Honor of Kari Syreeni, Studier i exegetik och judaistik utgivna av Teologiska fakulteten vid Åbo Akademi 11, Åbo: Åbo Akademi, 2012, 333–50.

Tissol, G., The Face of Nature: Wit, Narrative, and Cosmic Origins in Ovid's Metamorphoses, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, 1997.

Tobin, T. H., Paul's Rhetoric in Its Contexts: The Argument of Romans, Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2004.

Tolmie, D. F., Persuading the Galatians: A Text-Centered Rhetorical Analysis of a Pauline Letter, WUNT 2/190, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2005.

Tolmie, D. F., “The Rhetorical Analysis of the Letter to the Galatians 1995–2005,” in Tolmie, D. F. (ed.), Exploring New Rhetorical Approaches to Galatians, Acta Theologica Supplementum 9, Bloemfontein: University of the Free State, 2007, 1–28.

Tolmie, D. F. (ed.), Exploring New Rhetorical Approaches to Galatians, Acta Theologica S 9, Bloemfontein: University of the Free State, 2007.

Tomson, P. J., Paul and the Jewish Law: Halakha in the Letters of the Apostle to the Gentiles, CRINT III.1, Minneapolis: Fortress, 1990.

Too, Y. L., “Introduction: Writing the History of Ancient Education,” in Too, Y. L. (ed.), Education in Greek and Roman Antiquity, Leiden: Brill, 2001, 1–10.

Toulmin, S., The Uses of Argument, Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1958.

Trobisch, D., Die Entstehung der Paulusbriefsammlung: Studien zu den Anfängen christlicher Publizistik, NTOA 10, Freiburg and Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen, 1989.

Trobisch, D., Die Paulusbriefe und die Anfänge der christlichen Publizistik, KT 135, Gütersloh: Kaiser, 1994.

Tsang, S., “Are We ‘Misreading’ Paul? Oral Phenomena and Their Implication for the Exegesis of Paul's Letters,” Oral Tradition 24 (2009), 205–25.

Tsang, S., From Slaves to Sons: A New Rhetoric Analysis of Paul's Metaphors in His Letter to the Galatians, SBL 81, New York: Peter Lang, 2005.

Tulloch, J., and Alvarado, M., Dr. Who: The Unfolding Text, New York: St. Martin's, 1983.

Ukwuegbu, B. O., The Emergence of Christian Identity in Paul's Letter to the Galatians, Arbeiten zur Interkulturalität 4, Bonn: Borengässer, 2003.

Ulansey, D., The Origins of the Mithraic Mysteries: Cosmology and Salvation in the Ancient World, Oxford: Oxford University, 1989.

Urbach, E. E., “Class-Status and Leadership in the World of the Palestinian Sages,” PIASH 2 (1968), 38–74.

Vanderpool, E., “News Letter from Greece” AJA 63 (1959), 279–83.

van Eemeren, F. et al., Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Development, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1996.

van Unnik, W. C., Tarsus or Jerusalem: The City of Paul's Youth, London: Epworth, 1962.

Vegge, T., Paulus und das antike Schulwesen, BZNW 134, Berlin: de Gruyter, 2006.

Veyne, P. (ed.), From Pagan Rome to Byzantium, vol. 1 of A History of Private Life,trans. Goldhammer, A., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1987.

Vickers, B., In Defence of Rhetoric, Oxford: Oxford University, 1988.

Volkmann, R., Die Rhetorik der Griechen und Römer in systematischer Übersicht, 2nd ed., Leipzig: B. G. Teubner, 1885.

Vollenweider, S., Freiheit als neue Schöpfung: Eine Untersuchung zur Eleutheria bei Paulus und in seiner Umwelt, FRLANT 147, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1989.

von Albrecht, M., Geschichte der römischen Literatur: Von Andronicus bis Boethius, 2nd ed., Munich: de Gruyter, 1994.

von Thaden, R. H., “The Wisdom of Fleeing Porneia: Conceptual Blending in 1 Corinthians 6:12–7:7,” unpublished PhD dissertation, Emory University, 2007.

Vos, J. S., Die Kunst der Argumentation bei Paulus: Studien zur antiken Rhetorik, WUNT 149, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2002.

Vos, J. S., “Paul and Sophistic Rhetoric: A Perspective on his Argumentation in the Letter to the Galatians,” in Tolmie, D. F. (ed.), Exploring New Rhetorical Approaches to Galatians, Acta Theologica S 9, Bloemfontein: University of the Free State, 2007, 29–52.

Vos, J. S., “Rhetoric and Theology in the Letters of Paul,” in Sampley, J. P. and Lampe, P. (eds.), Paul and Rhetoric, London and New York: T&T Clark, 2010, 161–79.

Vouga, F., “Der Galaterbrief: Kein Brief an die Galater? Essay über den litararischen Charakter des letzten großen Paulusbriefes,” in Backhaus, K. and Untergaßmair, F. G. (eds.), Schrift und Tradition: Festschrift für Josef Ernst, Paderborn: Schöningh, 1996, 243–58.

Vouga, F., “Zur rhetorischen Gattung des Galaterbriefes,” ZNW 79 (1988), 291–2.

Walker, D. D., Paul's Offer of Leniency (2 Cor 10:1): Populist Ideology and Rhetoric in a Pauline Letter, WUNT 2/152, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2002.

Wall, R. W., “Introduction to Epistolary Literature,” in Keck, L. E. (ed.), The New Interpreter's Bible, vol. 10, Nashville: Abingdon, 1994, 369–91.

Wallace, R., “The Sophists in Athens,” in Raaflaub, K. and Boedeker, D. (eds.), Democracy, Empire, and the Arts in Fifth-Century Athens, Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1998, 203–22.

Wanamaker, C. A., Commentary on 1 and 2 Thessalonians, NIGTC, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1990.

Wanamaker, C. A., “Epistolary vs. Rhetorical Analysis: Is Synthesis Possible?” in Donfried, K. P. and Beutler, J. (eds.), The Thessalonians Debate: Methodological Discord or Methodological Synthesis? Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2000, 255–86.

Wanamaker, C. A., “A Rhetoric of Power: Ideology and 1 Corinthians 1–4,” in Burke, T. J. and Elliott, J. K. (eds.), Paul and the Corinthians: Studies in Honour of Margaret Thrall, NovTSup 109, Leiden: Brill, 2003, 115–37.

Wang, S., and Aamodt, S., “Your Brain Lies to You,” New York Times, 27 June 2008.

Watson, D. F., Invention, Arrangement, and Style: Rhetorical Criticism of Jude and 2 Peter, SBLDS 104, Atlanta: Scholars, 1988.

Watson, D. F., “A Reexamination of the Epistolary Analysis Underpinning the Arguments for the Composite Nature of Philippians,” in Fitzgerald, J. T., Olbricht, T. H. and White, L. M. (eds.), Early Christianity and Classical Culture: Comparative Studies in Honour of Abraham J. Malherbe, NovTSup 110, Leiden: Brill, 2003, 157–77.

Watson, D. F., “A Rhetorical Analysis of 2 John According to Greco-Roman Conventions,” NTS 35 (1989), 104–30.

Watson, D. F., “A Rhetorical Analysis of 3 John: A Study in Epistolary Rhetoric,” CBQ 51 (1989), 479–501.

Watson, D. F., “A Rhetorical Analysis of Philippians and Its Implications for the Unity Question,” NovT 30 (1988), 57–88.

Watson, D. F., “The Role of Style in the Pauline Epistles: From Ornamentation to Argumentative Strategies,” in Sampley, J. P. and Lampe, P. (eds.), Paul and Rhetoric, London and New York: T&T Clark, 2010, 119–39.

Watson, D. F., “The Three Species of Rhetoric and the Study of the Pauline Epistles,” in Sampley, J. P. and Lampe, P. (eds.), Paul and Rhetoric, London and New York: T&T Clark, 2010, 25–47.

Watson, D. F. (ed.), Persuasive Artistry: Studies in New Testament Rhetoric in Honor of George A. Kennedy, JSNTSup 50, Sheffield: JSOT, 1991.

Watson, D. F. and Hauser, A. J. (eds.), Rhetorical Criticism of the Bible: A Comprehensive Bibliography with Notes on History and Method, BINS 4, Leiden: Brill, 1994.

Weiss, J., “Beiträge zur Paulinischen Rhetoric,” in Gregory, C. R. (ed.), Theologische Studien, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1897, 165–247.

Welborn, L. L., Paul, the Fool of Christ: A Study of 1 Corinthians 1–4 in the Comic-Philosophic Tradition, JSNTSup 293, New York: T&T Clark, 2005.

Westfall, C. L., “A Discourse Analysis of Romans 7.7–25: The Pauline Autobiography?” in Porter, S. E. and O'Donnell, M. B. (eds.), The Linguist as Pedagogue: Trends in the Teaching and Linguistic Analysis of the Greek New Testament, Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix, 2009, 146–58.

White, J. L., The Form and Function of the Body of the Greek Letter, SBLDS 2, Missoula, MT: SBL, 1972.

White, J. L., “The New Testament Epistolary Literature in the Framework of Ancient Epistolography,” ANRW 2.25.2, Berlin: de Gruyter, 1984, 1730–56.

White, J. L., “The Structural Analysis of Philemon: A Point of Departure in the Formal Analysis of the Pauline Letter,” in SBLSP 1971, Atlanta: SBL, 1971, 1–47.

White, J. L., and Kensinger, K. A., “Categories of Greek Papyrus Letters,” in SBLSP 1976, Missoula, MT: Scholars, 1976, 79–91.

White, L. M., “Rhetoric and Reality in Galatians: Framing the Social Demands of Friendship,” in Fitzgerald, J. T., Olbricht, T. H., and White, L. M. (eds.), Early Christianity and Classical Culture: Comparative Studies in Honour of Abraham J. Malherbe, NovTSup 110, Leiden: Brill, 2003, 307–49.

Whorf, B. L., Language, Thought, and Reality, ed. Carroll, J. B., 1956, repr., Cambridge, MA: M.I.T., 1973.

Wilken, R. L., The Christians as the Romans Saw Them, New Haven, CT: Yale University, 1984.

Wilson, T. A., The Curse of the Law and the Crisis in Galatia: Reassessing the Purpose of Galatians, WUNT 2/225, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2007.

Windisch, H., Der zweite Korintherbrief, 9th ed., KEK 6, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1924.

Winter, B. W., Philo and Paul among the Sophists: Alexandrian and Corinthian Responses to a Julio-Claudian Movement, 2nd ed., SNTSMS 96, Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2002.

Winter, B. W., “Philodemus and Paul on Delivery (ὑπόκρισις),” in Fitzgerald, J. T. et al. (eds.), Philodemus and the New Testament World, NovTSup 111, Leiden: Brill, 2004, 323–42.

Winterbottom, M., “Perorations,” in Powell, J. and Patterson, J. (eds.), Cicero: The Advocate, Oxford: Oxford University, 2004, 215–30.

Winterbottom, M., Roman Declamation, Bristol: Bristol Classical, 1980.

Witherington, B., 1 and 2 Thessalonians: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2006.

Witherington, B., “‘Almost Thou Persuadest Me …’: The Importance of Greco-Roman Rhetoric for the Understanding of the Text and Context of the NT,” JETS 58 (2015), 63–88.

Witherington, B., Grace in Galatia: A Commentary on St. Paul's Letter to the Galatians, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998.

Witherington, B., New Testament Rhetoric: An Introductory Guide to the Art of Persuasion in and of the New Testament, Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2009.

Witherington, B., The Problem with Evangelical Theology: Testing the Exegetical Foundations of Calvinism, Dispensationalism, and Wesleyanism, Waco, TX: Baylor University, 2005.

Witherington, B., What's in the Word: Rethinking the Socio-Rhetorical Character of the New Testament, Waco, TX: Baylor University, 2009, 61–76.

Witherington, B., with Hyatt, Darlene, Paul's Letter to the Romans: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2004.

Wuellner, W., “The Argumentative Structure of 1 Thessalonians as a Paradoxical Encomium,” in Collins, R. F. (ed.), The Thessalonian Correspondence, BETL 87, Leuven: Leuven University, 1990, 117–36.

Wuellner, W., “Paul's Rhetoric of Argumentation in Romans: An Alternative to the Donfried-Karris Debate over Romans,” CBQ 38 (1976), 330–51.

Wuellner, W., “The Rhetorical Structure of Jesus’ Sermon in Luke 12.1–13.9,” in Watson, D. F. (ed.), Persuasive Artistry: Studies in New Testament Rhetoric in Honor of George A. Kennedy, JSNTSup 50, Sheffield: JSOT, 1991, 41–65.

Wuellner, W., “Where Is Rhetorical Criticism Taking Us?” CBQ 49 (1987), 448–63.

Paul and Ancient Rhetoric

Theory and Practice in the Hellenistic Context

This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

Edited by Stanley E. Porter, McMaster University, Ontario , Bryan R. Dyer, McMaster University, Ontario

Book description

Refine List

Metrics

Full text views

Book summary page views

Paul and Ancient Rhetoric

Theory and Practice in the Hellenistic Context

This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

Edited by Stanley E. Porter, McMaster University, Ontario , Bryan R. Dyer, McMaster University, Ontario

CAPTCHA *

Book description

Refine List

Save Search

Metrics

Full text views Full text views reflects the number of PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views for chapters in this book.

Book summary page views Book summary views reflect the number of visits to the book and chapter landing pages.

Full text views

Book summary page views