Skip to main content
×
Home
Philosophical Perspectives on Infinity
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 12
  • Cited by
    This book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Loke, Andrew Ter Ern 2016. On the Infinite God Objection: a Reply to Jacobus Erasmus and Anné Hendrik Verhoef. Sophia, Vol. 55, Issue. 2, p. 263.


    Franklin, James 2014. An Aristotelian Realist Philosophy of Mathematics.


    Usó-Doménech, J. L. and Nescolarde-Selva, J. 2014. Revealing the Face of Isis. Foundations of Science, Vol. 19, Issue. 3, p. 311.


    Kabay, Paul Douglas 2013. A Noneist Account of the Doctrine of Creatio ex Nihilo. Sophia, Vol. 52, Issue. 2, p. 281.


    Loke, Andrew Ter Ern 2012. IS AN INFINITE TEMPORAL REGRESS OF EVENTS POSSIBLE?. Think, Vol. 11, Issue. 31, p. 105.


    Oppy, Graham 2012. The Blackwell Companion to Science and Christianity.


    Steinhart, Eric 2012. On the number of gods. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Vol. 72, Issue. 2, p. 75.


    Laraudogoitia, J. P. 2011. The inverse spaceship paradox. Synthese, Vol. 178, Issue. 3, p. 429.


    Oppy, Graham 2011. Perfection, near-perfection, maximality, and Anselmian Theism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Vol. 69, Issue. 2, p. 119.


    Rasmussen, Joshua 2010. Cosmological Arguments from Contingency. Philosophy Compass, Vol. 5, Issue. 9, p. 806.


    Oppy, Graham 2009. Cosmological Arguments*. Noûs, Vol. 43, Issue. 1, p. 31.


    Dombrowski, Daniel A. 2007. Oppy, infinity, and the neoclassical concept of God. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Vol. 61, Issue. 1, p. 25.


    ×
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    Philosophical Perspectives on Infinity
    • Online ISBN: 9780511498985
    • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498985
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to? *
    ×
  • Buy the print book

Book description

This book is an exploration of philosophical questions about infinity. Graham Oppy examines how the infinite lurks everywhere, both in science and in our ordinary thoughts about the world. He also analyses the many puzzles and paradoxes that follow in the train of the infinite. Even simple notions, such as counting, adding and maximising present serious difficulties. Other topics examined include the nature of space and time, infinities in physical science, infinities in theories of probability and decision, the nature of part/whole relations, mathematical theories of the infinite, and infinite regression and principles of sufficient reason.

Reviews

'Philosophical Perspectives on Infinity is a very good book and I am pleased to recommend it.'

Source: The Times Literary Supplement

    • Aa
    • Aa
Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send:
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.


A. Abian 1978. “Passages between Finite and Infinite.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 19:452–6.

V. Allis , and T. Koetsier . 1991. “On Some Paradoxes of the Infinite.” British Journal for Philosophy of Science 42:187–94.

V. Allis , and T. Koetsier . 1995. “On Some Paradoxes of the Infinite II.” British Journal for Philosophy of Science 46:235–47.

J. Almog 1999. “Nothing, Something, Infinity.” Journal of Philosophy 96:462–78.

J. Alper , and M. Bridger . 1997. “Mathematics, Model and Zeno's Paradoxes.” Synthese 110:143–66.

L. Angel 2002. “Zeno's Arrow, Newton's Mechanics, and Bell's Inequalities.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53:161–82.

F. Arntzenius , and D. McCarthy . 1997. “The Two Envelope Paradox and Infinite Expectations.” Analysis 57:42–50.

M. Arsenijivic 1989. “How Many Physically Distinguished Parts Can a Limited Body Contain?Analysis 49:36–42.

J. Bell 1979. “The Infinite Past Regained: A Reply to Whitrow.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30:161–5.

J. Bell 1988. “Infinitesimals.” Synthese 75:285–315.

G. Belot 2001. “The Principle of Sufficient Reason.” Journal of Philosophy 98:55–74.

P. Benacerraf 1962. “Tasks, Supertasks, and the Modern Eleatics.” Journal of Philosophy 59:765–84.

P. Benacerraf 1965. “What Numbers Could Not Be.” Philosophical Review 74:47–73.

P. Benacerraf 1985. “Skolem and the Sceptic.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, supp. vol. 59:85–115.

J. Bennett 1971. “The Age and Size of the World.” Synthese 23:127–46.

G. Berresford 1981. “A Note on Thomson's Lamp ‘Paradox.’” Analysis 41:1–3.

M. Black 1951. “Achilles and the Tortoise.” Analysis 11:91–101.

R. Blake 1926. “The Paradox of Temporal Process.” Journal of Philosophy 23:645–54.

D. Bostock 1972/3. “Aristotle, Zeno, and the Potential Infinite.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 73:37–5.

J. Broome 1995. “The Two-Envelope Paradox.” Analysis 55:6–11.

P. Brown 1965. “A Medieval Analysis of Infinity.” Journal for the History of Philosophy 3:242–3.

J. Cain 1995. “Infinite Utility.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73:401–4.

F. Cajori 1915. “The History of Zeno's Arguments on Motion.” American Mathematical Monthly 22:1–7, 39–47, 77–83, 109–15, 143–9, 179–86, 215–21, 253–8, 292–7.

J. Cargile 1992. “On a Problem about Probability and Decision.” Analysis 52:211–16.

P. Castell , and D. Batens . 1994. “The Two Envelope Paradox: The Infinite Case.” Analysis 54:46–9.

D. Chalmers 2002. “The St. Petersburg Two Envelope Paradox.” Analysis 62:155–7.

J. Chase 2002. “The Non-Probabilistic Two Envelope Paradox.” Analysis 62:157–60.

C. Chihara 1965. “On the Possibility of Completing an Infinite Process.” Philosophical Review 74:74–87.

R. Christensen , and J. Utts . 1992. “Bayesian Resolution of the ‘Exchange Paradox.’” American Statistician 46:274–6.

M. Clark , and N. Schackel . 2000. “The Two Envelope Paradox.” Mind 109:415–42.

P. Clark , and S. Read . 1984. “Hypertasks.” Synthese 61:387–90.

P. Clayton 1996. “The Theistic Argument from Infinity in Early Modern Philosophy.” International Philosophical Quarterly 36:5–17.

J. Cleve 1971. “Cauchy, Convergence and Continuity.” British Journal for Philosophy of Science 22:27–37.

R. Cohen , and L. Lauden , eds. 1983. Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis. Dordrecht: Reidel.

D. Conway 1974. “Possibility and Infinite Time: A Logical Paradox in St. Thomas' Third Way.” International Philosophical Quarterly 14:201–8.

D. Conway 1984. “‘It Would Have Happened Already’: On One Argument for a First Cause.” Analysis 44:159–66.

S. Corbett 1988. “Zeno's Achilles: A Reply to John McKie.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 49:325–31.

T. Cowen , and J. High . 1988. “Time, Bounded Utility, and the St. Petersburg Paradox.” Theory and Decision 25:219–23.

W. Craig 1979a. The Kalām Cosmological Argument. London: Macmillan.

W. Craig 1979b. “Whitrow, Popper, and the Impossibility of an Infinite Past.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30:166–70.

W. Craig 1985. “Professor Mackie and the Kalām Cosmological Argument.” Religious Studies 20:367–75.

W. Craig 1991a. “Time and Infinity.” International Philosophical Quarterly 31:387–401.

W. Craig 1991b. “Theism and Big Bang Cosmology.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69:492–503.

W. Craig 1993. “Graham Oppy on the Kalām Cosmological Argument.” Sophia 32:1–11.

N. Cutland et al. 1988. “On Cauchy's Notion of Infinitesimal.” British Journal for Philosophy of Science 39:375–8.

J. Dauben 1977. “Georg Cantor and Pope Leo XIII: Mathematics, Theology, and the Infinite.” Journal of the History of Ideas 38:85–108.

T. Day 1987a. “Aquinas on Infinite Regress.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 22:151–64.

T. Day 1987b. “Infinite Regress Arguments.” Philosophical Papers 16:155–64.

M. Detlefsen 1986. Hilbert's Program: An Essay on Mathematical Instrumentalism. Dordrecht: Reidel.

P. Diamond 1965. “The Evaluation of Infinite Utility Streams.” Econometrica 33:170–7.

R. Diamond 1964. “Resolution of the Paradox of Tristram Shandy.” Philosophy of Science 31:55–8.

F. Dretske 1965. “Counting to Infinity.” Analysis 25:99–101.

J. Earman , and J. Norton . 1993. “Forever Is a Day: Supertasks in Pitowsky and Malament-Hogarth Spacetimes.” Philosophy of Science 60:22–42.

E. Eells 1988. “Quentin Smith on Infinity and the Past.” Philosophy of Science 55:453–5.

P. Ehrlich 1982. “Negative, Infinite and Hotter Than Infinite Temperatures.” Synthese. 50:233–77.

P. Ehrlich 1994. Real Numbers, Generalisations of the Real, and Theories of Continua. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

P. Ehrlich 1997. “From Completeness to Archimedean Completeness.” Synthese 110:57–76.

G. Evans 1978. “Can There Be Vague Objects?Analysis 38:208.

S. Feferman 1989. “Infinity in Mathematics: Is Cantor Necessary?Philosophical Topics 17:23–45.

J. Fenstad 1985. “Is Non-Standard Analysis Relevant for the Philosophy of Mathematics?Synthese 62:289–301.

F. Fitch 1955. “A Logical Analysis of Some Value Concepts.” Journal of Symbolic Logic 28:135–42.

P. Forrest 1996. “How Innocent Is Mereology?Analysis 56:127–31.

R. Gale , and A. Pruss . 1999. “A New Cosmological Argument.” Religious Studies 35:461–76.

A. George 1991. “Goldbach's Conjecture Can Be Decided in One Minute: On an Alleged Problem for Intuitionism.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 91:187–9.

R. Godfrey 1993. “Paradoxes and Infinite Numbers.” Philosophy 68:541–5.

H. Gonshor 1986. An Introduction to the Theory of Surreal Numbers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

L. Goodman 1971. “Ghazālī's Argument from Creation.” International Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 2:67–85, 168–88.

C. Gruender 1966. “The Achilles Paradox and Transfinite Numbers.” British Journal for Philosophy of Science 17:219–31.

A. Grünbaum 1952a. “A Consistent Conception of the Extended Linear Continuum as an Aggregate of Unextended Elements.” Philosophy of Science 19:288–306.

A. Grünbaum 1952b. “Messrs. Black and Taylor on Temporal Paradoxes.” Analysis 12:144–8.

C. Wagner 1999. “Misadventures in Conditional Expectation: The Two Envelope Paradox.” Erkenntnis 51:233–41.

R. Walker 1997. “Sufficient Reason.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 97:109–23.

J. Watling 1952. “The Sum of an Infinite Series.” Analysis 13:39–46.

R. Weingard 1979. “General Relativity and the Length of the Past.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30:170–2.

P. Weirich 1984. “The St. Petersburg Gamble and Risk.” Theory and Decision 17:193–202.

G. Whitrow 1978. “On the Impossibility of an Infinite Past.” British Journal for Philosophy of Science 29:39–45.

J. Wisdom 1952. “Achilles on a Physical Racecourse.” Analysis 12:67–72.

H. Wolfson 1966. “Patristic Arguments against the Eternity of the World.” Harvard Theological Review 59:354–67.

S. Yablo 2000. “A Reply to New Zeno.” Analysis 60:148–51.

M. Zangari 1994. “Zeno, Zero, and Indeterminate Forms: Instants in the Logic of Motion.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72:187–204.

G. Oppy 1996a. “Pascal's Wager Is a Possible Bet (but Not a Very Good One): Reply to Harmon Holcomb III.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 40:101–16.

G. Oppy 1996b. “Review of W. Craig and Q. Smith, Theism, Atheism and Big Bang Cosmology.” Faith and Philosophy 13:125–33.

G. Oppy 1997a. “Countable Fusion Not Yet Proven Guilty: It May Be the Whiteheadian Account of Space Whatdunnit.” Analysis 57, no. 4:249–53.

G. Oppy 1997b. “Pantheism, Quantification, and Mereology.” Monist 80, no. 2:320–36.

G. Oppy 2000a. “Humean Supervenience?Philosophical Studies 101, no. 1:75–105.

G. Oppy 2000b. “On ‘A New Cosmological Argument.’Religious Studies 36:345–53.

G. Oppy 2002a. “Arguing about the Kalām Cosmological Argument.” Philo 5, no 1:34–61.

G. Oppy 2002b. “More Than a Flesh Wound: Reply to Oderberg.” Ars Disputandi 2:1–11. [Http://www.ArsDisputandi.org].

G. Oppy 2004. “Faulty Reasoning about Default Principles in Cosmological Arguments.” Faith and Philosophy 21:242–9.

G. Owen 1958. “Zeno and the Mathematicians.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 58:199–222.

J. Perez-Laraudogoitia 1997. “Classical Particle Dynamics, Indeterminism, and a Supertask.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48:49–54.

J. Perez-Laraudogoitia 1998. “Infinity Machines and Creation Ex Nihilo.” Synthese 115:259–65.

J. Perez-Laraudogoitia 2000. “Priest on the Paradox of the Gods.” Analysis 60:152–5.

J. Perez-Laraudogoitia 2002a. “On the Dynamics of Alper and Bridger.” Synthese 131:157–71.

J. Perez-Laraudogoitia 2002b. “Just as Beautiful but Not (Necessarily) a Supertask.” Mind 111:281–7.

J. Perez-Laraudogoitia 2003. “A Variant of Benardette's Paradox.” Analysis 63:124–31.

W. Pomerlau 1985. “Does Reason Demand That God Be Infinite?Sophia 24:18–27.

M. Potter 1996. “Taming the Infinite.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47:609–19.

H. Price 1992. “Metaphysical Pluralism.” Journal of Philosophy 89:387–409.

G. Priest 1987. In Contradiction. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

G. Priest 1999. “On a Version of One of Zeno's Paradoxes.” Analysis 59:1–2.

F. qFiasco 1980. “Another Look at Some of Zeno's Paradoxes.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10:119–30.

M. Radner 1998. “Unlocking the Second Antinomy: Kant and Wulff.” Journal for the History of Philosophy 36:413–41.

A. Rapaport 1998. Decision Theory and Decision Behaviour. London: Macmillan.

A. Robinson 1973. “Metamathematical Problems.” Journal of Symbolic Logic 38:500–16.

M. Sainsbury 1995. Paradoxes. New York: Cambridge.

D. Sanford 1969. “Time May Have a Stop.” Analysis 29:206

D. Sanford 2003. “Fusion Confusion.” Analysis 63:1–4.

E. Schoen 1990. “The Sensory Presentation of Divine Infinity.” Faith and Philosophy 7:3–18.

A. Scott , and D. Scott . 1997. “What Is in the Two Envelope Paradox?Analysis 57:34–41.

L. Segel 1991. “The Infinite and Infinitesimal in Models for Natural Phenomena.” Reviews of Modern Physics 63:225–38.

K. Segerberg 1976. “A Neglected Family of Aggregation Problems in Ethics.” Nous 10:221–47.

D. Sherry 1988. “Zeno's Metrical Paradox Revisited.” Philosophy of Science 55:58–73.

B. Skyrms , and W. Harper , eds. 1988. Causation, Chance and Credence, vol. 1. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

R. Small 1986. “Tristram Shandy's Last Page.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37:213–16.

Q. Smith 1985. “Kant and the Beginning of the World.” New Scholasticism 59:339–48.

Q. Smith 1987. “Infinity and the Past.” Philosophy of Science 54:63–75.

Q. Smith 1988. “The Uncaused Beginning of the Universe.” Philosophy of Science 55:39–57.

Q. Smith 1991. “Atheism, Theism and Big Bang Cosmology.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69:48–65.

Q. Smith 1993. “Reply to Craig: The Possible Infinitude of the Past.” International Philosophical Quarterly 33:109–15.

Q. Smith 1995a. “A Defence of a Principle of Sufficient Reason.” Metaphilosophy 26:97–106.

Q. Smith 1995b. “Internal and External Causal Explanation of the Universe.” Philosophical Studies 79:283–310.

Q. Smith 1997. “Simplicity and Why the Universe Exists.” Philosophy 72:125–32.

Q. Smith 1999. “The Reason the Universe Exists Is That It Caused Itself to Exist.” Philosophy 74:579–86.

Q. Smith 2000. “Problem's with John Earman's Attempt to Reconcile Theism with General Relativity.” Erkenntnis 52:1–27.

E. Sweeney 1993. “Thomas Aquinas' Double Metaphysics of Simplicity and Infinity.” International Philosophical Quarterly 33:297–317.

R. Swinburne 1966. “The Beginning of the Universe.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 40:125–38.

R. Swinburne 1968. Space and Time. London: Macmillan.

R. Taylor 1951. “Mr. Black on Temporal Paradoxes.” Analysis 12:38–44.

R. Taylor 1952. “Mr. Wisdom on Temporal Paradoxes.” Analysis 13:15–17.

P. Teller 1989. “Infinite Renormalisation.” Philosophy of Science 56:238–57.

J. Thomson 1954. “Tasks and Supertasks.” Analysis 15:1–13.

P. Vallentyne 1993. “Utilitarianism and Infinite Utility.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71:212–17.

P. Vallentyne 1995. “Infinite Utility: Anonymity and Person-Centredness.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73:413–20.

P. Vallentyne , and S. Kagan . 1997. “Infinite Utility and Finitely Additive Value Theory.” Journal of Philosophy 94:5–26.

J. Bendegem 1987. “Zeno's Paradoxes and the Tile Argument.” Philosophy of Science 54:295–302.

J. Bendegem 1994. “Ross' Paradox Is an Impossible Super-task.” British Journal for Philosophy of Science 45:743–8.

J. Cleve 1981. “Reflections on Kant's Second Antimony.” Synthese 47:481–94.

D. Dantzig 1955. “Is a Finite Number?Dialectica 9:273–7.

B. Fraassen 1995. “‘World’ Is Not a Count Noun.” Nous 29:139–57.

L. Liederkerke 1995. “Should Utilitarians Be Cautious about an Infinite Future?Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73:405–7.

N. Vilenkin 1995. In Search of Infinity. Boston: Birkhaüser.

G. Vlastos 1966a. “A Note on Zeno's Arrow.” Phronesis 11:3–18.

G. Vlastos 1966b. “Zeno's Race Course.” Journal of History of Philosophy 4:95–108.

A. Grünbaum 1973b. Philosophical Problems of Space and Time. Dordrecht: Reidel.

A. Hájek 2003. “Waging War on Pascal's Wager.” Philosophical Review 112:27–56.

J. Haldane 1983. “A Benign Regress.” Analysis 43:115–16.

C. Harrison 1996. “The Three Arrows of Zeno.” Synthese 107:271–92.

W. Hart 1975/6. “The Potential Infinite.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 76:247–64.

A. Hazen 1976. “Expressive Completeness in Modal Language.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 5:25–46.

A. Hazen 1993. “Slicing It Thin.” Analysis 53:189–92.

M. Hazewinkel , ed. 1989. Encyclopedia of Mathematics, vol. 3. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

J. Hinton , and C. Martin. 1953/4. “Achilles and the Tortoise.” Analysis 14:56–68.

P. Holgate 1994. “Mathematical Notes on Ross' Paradox.” British Journal for Philosophy of Science 45:302–4.

T. Horgan 2000. “The Two-Envelope Paradox, Non-Standard Expected Utility, and the Intensionality of Probability.” Nous 34:578–602.

P. Huby 1971. “Kant or Cantor: That the Universe, If Real, Must Be Finite in Both Space and Time.” Philosophy 46:121–32.

P. Huby 1973. “Cosmology and Infinity.” Philosophy 48:186–7.

N. Huggett 1999. “Atomic Metaphysics.” Journal of Philosophy 96:5–24.

T. Humphrey 1974. “How Descartes Avoids the Hidden Faculties Trap.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 12:371–7.

D. Isles 1992. “What Evidence Is There That 265536 Is a Natural Number?Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 33:465–80.

F. Jackson , P. Menzies , and G. Oppy . 1994. “The Two Envelope Paradox.” Analysis 54:43–5.

D. Jacquette 1993. “Kant's Second Antinomy and Hume's Theory of Extensionless Indivisibles.” Kant-Studien 84:38–50.

P. Johnson 1993. “Wholes, Parts, and Infinite Collections.” Philosophy 67:367–79.

P. Johnson 1994. “More about Infinite Numbers.” Philosophy 69:369–70.

R. Jozsa 1986. “An Approach to the Modelling of the Physical Continuum.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37:395–404.

H. King 1949. “Aristotle and the Paradoxes of Zeno.” Journal of Philosophy 46:657–70.

P. Klein 2003. “When Infinite Regresses Are Not Vicious.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66:718–29.

P. Krausser 1988. “On the Antinomies and the Appendix to Kant's Dialectic in Kant's Critique and Philosophy of Science.” Synthese 77:375–401.

L. Lauwers 1997. “Infinite Utility: Insisting on Strong Monotonicity.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75:222–33.

S. Lavine 1991. “Is Quantum Mechanics an Atomistic Theory?Synthese 89:253–71.

S. Lavine 1995. “Finite Mathematics.” Synthese 103:389–420.

N. Lawrence 1950. “Whitehead's Method of Extensive Abstraction.” Philosophy of Science 17:142–63.

J. Lear 1981. “A Note on Zeno's Arrow.” Phronesis 26:91–104.

Z. Loparic 1990. “The Logical Structure of the First Antinomy.” Kant-Studien 81:280–303.

M. Machover 1993. “The Place of Non-Standard Analysis in Mathematics and Mathematics Teaching.” British Journal for Philosophy of Science 44:205–12.

E. Maor 1987. To Infinity and Beyond. Boston: Birkhaüser.

T. McGrew , D. Shier , and H. Silverstein . 1997. “The Two Envelope Paradox Resolved.” Analysis 57:28–33.

W. McLaughlin 1998. “Thomson's Lamp Is Dysfunctional.” Synthese 116:281–301.

W. McLaughlin , and S. Miller . 1992. “An Epistemological Use of Non-Standard Analysis to Answer Zeno's Objections against Motion.” Synthese 92:371–84.

N. Monk 1997. “Conceptions of Space-Time: Problems and Possible Solutions.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 28, no. 1:1–34.

A. Moore 1990. The Infinite. London: Routledge.

A. Moore 1992. “A Note on Kant's First Antinomy.” Philosophical Quarterly 42:480–5.

M. Moore 2002. A Cantorian Argument against Infinitesimals.” Synthese 133:305–30.

W. Morriston 1999. “Must the Past Have a Beginning?Philo 2:5–19.

W. Morriston 2002c. “Craig on the Actual Infinite.” Religious Studies 38:147–66.

B. Mundy 1987. “Faithful Representation, Physical Extensive Measurement Theory and Archimedean Axioms.” Synthese 70:373–400.

J. Mycielski 1981. “Analysis without Actual Infinity.” Journal of Symbolic Logic 46:625–33.

J. Mycielski 1986. “Locally Finite Theories.” Journal of Symbolic Logic 51:59–62.

B. Nalebuff 1989. “The Other Person's Envelope Is Always Greener.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 3:171–81.

E. Nelson 1977. “Internal Set Theory: A New Approach to Non-Standard Analysis.” Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 83, no. 6:1165–98.

E. Nelson 1987. Radically Elementary Probability Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Y. Ng 1995. “Infinite Utility and van Liedekerke's Impossibility: A Solution.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73:408–12.

D. Nolan 1996. “Recombination Unbound.” Philosophical Studies 84:239–62.

D. Nolan 2001. “What Wrong with Infinite Regresses?Metaphilosophy 32:523–38.

R. Oakes 1997. “The Divine Infinity: Can Traditional Theists Justifiably Reject Pantheism.” Monist 80:251–65.

W. O'Briant 1979. “Is Descartes' Evil Spirit Finite or Infinite?Sophia 18:28–32.

J. O'Leary-Hawthorne , and A. Cortens . 1995. “Towards Ontological Nihilism.” Philosphical Studies 79, no. 2:143–65.

G. Oppy 1990. “On Rescher on Pascal's Wager.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 30:159–68.

G. Oppy 1991. “Craig, Mackie and the Kalām Cosmological Argument.” Religious Studies 27:189–97.

G. Oppy 1995a. “Inverse Operations with Transfinite Numbers and the Kalām Cosmological Argument.” International Philosophical Quarterly 35, no. 2:219–21.

G. Oppy 1995b. “Kalām Cosmological Arguments: Reply to Professor Craig.” Sophia 34:15–29.

G. Oppy 1995d. “Professor William Craig's Criticisms of Critiques of Kalām Cosmological Arguments by Paul Davies, Stephen Hawking, and Adolf Grünbaum.” Faith and Philosophy 12:237–50.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 19 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 45 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 27th March 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.