References
Adler, Jonathan E. 2002. Belief’s Own Ethics. Cambridge, ma: The MIT Press.
Aikin, Scott F. 2008. “Perelmanian Universal Audience and the Epistemic Aspirations of Argument,” Philosophy and Rhetoric 41 (3): 238–59.
Alexy, Robert 1989. A Theory of Legal Argumentation: The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification. Ruth, Adler and Neil, MacCormick (trans.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Allard-Nelson, Susan 2001. “Virtue in Aristotle’s Rhetoric: A Metaphysical and Ethical Capacity,” Philosophy and Rhetoric 34 (3): 245–59.
Allen, James 2001. Inference from Signs. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Angenot, Marc 2008. Dialogues de sourds: traité de rhétorique antilogique. Paris: Mille et une nuits/Fayard.
Aristotle, 2007. On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. George, A. Kennedy (trans. Introduction, Notes, & Appendices). Oxford University Press.
Aristotle, 1984. “Poetics,” Bywater, I. (trans.). In Barnes, Jonathan (ed.) The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. Princeton University Press.
Aristotle, 1984. “Prior Analytics,” Jenkinson, A. J. (trans.). In Barnes, Jonathan (ed.) The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. Princeton University Press.
Aristotle, 1997. Topics: Books I and VIII, with Excerpts from Related Texts. Robin, Smith (trans,). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Asen, Robert 2005. “Pluralism, Disagreement, and the Status of Argument in the Public Sphere,” Informal Logic 25 (2): 117–37.
Asen, Robert and Brouwer, Daniel C. 2001. “Introduction: Reconfigurations of the Public Sphere,” in Asen, Robert and Brouwer, Daniel C. (eds.) Counterpublics and the State. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 1–32.
Bach, Kent 1999. “The Myth of Conventional Implicature,” Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 327–66.
Baier, Annette C. 1995. Moral Prejudices. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bakhtin, Mikhail 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Holquist, Michael (ed.), Emerson, C. and Holquist, M. (trans.). University of Austin Press.
Barnes, Jonathan 2007. Truth, etc. Six Lectures on Ancient Logic. Oxford University Press.
Baynes, Kenneth 2001. “Practical Reason, the “Space of Reasons,” and Public Reason,” in Rehg, William and Bonham, James (eds.) Pluralism and the pragmatic Turn: The Transformation of Critical Theory. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 53–85.
Bell, Andrew, Swenson-Wright, John and Tybjerg, Karin 2008. Evidence. Cambridge University Press.
Benhabib, Seyla 1992. Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. London: Routledge.
Berger, John 2011. Bento’s Sketchbook. New York: Pantheon Books.
Bett, Richard 1998. “The Sceptics and the Emotions,” in Sihvola, Juha and Engberg-Pedersen, Troels (eds.) The Emotions in Hellenistic Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers: pp. 197–218.
Booth, Wayne C. 1974. Modern Dogma and the Rhetoric of Assent. University of Notre Dame Press.
Brandom, Robert 1994. Making it Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brandom, Robert 2000. Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brandom, Robert 2008a. Between Saying and Doing: Towards an Analytic Pragmatism. Oxford University Press.
Brandom, Robert 2008b. “Responses,” in Stekeler-Weithofer (ed.), pp. 209–29.
Burke, Kenneth 1950. A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Burnyeat, M. F. 1994. “Enthymeme: Aristotle on the Logic of Persuasion,” in Furley, David J. and Nehamas, Alexander (eds.) Aristotle’s Rhetoric: Philosophical Essays. Princeton University Press, pp. 3–55.
Burnyeat, M. F. 2008. “Kinêsis vs. Energeia: A Much-read Passage in (but not of) Aristotle’s Metaphysics,” in Sedley, D. (ed.) Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy XXXIV, pp. 219–92.
Camus, Albert 1972. Neither Victims nor Executioners, World Without War Publications.
Carston, Robyn 2005. “Relevance Theory, Grice and the neo-Griceans: a Response to Laurence Horn’s ‘Current Issues in Neo-Gricean Pragmatics’,” Intercultural Pragmatics 2: 303–19.
Chapman, Siobhan 2005. Paul Grice, Philosopher and Linguist. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chastian, C. 1975. “Reference and Context,” in Gunderson, K. (ed.) Language, Mind and Knowledge. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 194–269.
Cialdini, Robert B. 1984. Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. New York: William Morrow.
Chilton, Paul 2004. Analysing Political Discourse. London: Routledge.
Clark, Andy and Chalmers, David 1998. “The Extended Mind,” Analysis, 58: 7–19.
Coady, C. A. J. 1992. Testimony: A Philosophical Study. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Code, Lorraine 2006. Ecological Thinking: The Politics of Epistemic Location. Oxford University Press.
Colebrook, Claire 2004. Irony. London: Routledge.
Crawford, Neta 2002. Argument and Change in World Politics: Ethics, Decolonization, and Humanitarian Intervention. Cambridge University Press.
Crosswhite, James 1996. The Rhetoric of Reason: Writing and the Attractions of Argument. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
Crosswhite, James 2013. Deep Rhetoric: Philosophy, Reason, Violence, Justice, Wisdom. University of Chicago Press.
Damasio, Antonio R. 1994. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. London: Picador.
Damasio, Antonio R. 1999. The Feeling of what Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace & Company.
Davidson, Donald 1980. Actions and Events. Oxford University Press.
Dennett, Daniel 1995. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. New York: Touchstone.
Derrida, Jacques 1974. Of Grammatology. Spivak, G. C. (trans.). Baltimore: The John Hopkins Press.
Derrida, Jacques 1982. Margins of Philosophy. Bass, A. (trans.). University of Chicago Press.
Derrida, Jacques 1988. Limited Inc. Samuel, Weber (trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
De Sousa, Ronald 1987. The Rationality of Emotion. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Dewey, John 1927. The Public and its Problems. Denver: Henry Holt and Company.
Eco, Umberto 2003. Mouse or Rat? Translation as Negotiation. London: Weidenfield & Nicolson.
Ede, Lisa 1989. “Rhetoric versus Philosophy: The Role of the Universal Audience in Chaim Perelman’s The New Rhetoric,” in Dearin, Ray D. (ed.) The New Rhetoric of Chaim Perelman: Statement & Response. New York: University Press of America, pp. 141–51.
Ede, L. and Lunsford, A. 1984. “Audience addressed/audience invoked: The role of audience in composition theory and pedagogy,” College Composition and Communication 35: 155–71.
van Eemeren, Frans H. 2010. Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub Co.
van Eemeren, Frans H. and Grootendorst, Rob 1984. Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
van Eemeren, Frans H. and Grootendorst, Rob 1992. Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
van Eemeren, Frans H. and Grootendorst, Rob 1995. “Perelman and the Fallacies,” Philosophy and Rhetoric 28: 122–33.
van Eemeren, Frans H. and Grootendorst, Rob 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge University Press.
van Eemeren, Frans H. and Houtlosser, Peter 1999. “Strategic Manoeuvring in Argumentative Discourse,” Discourse Studies 1 (4): 479–97.
van Eemeren, Frans H. and Houtlosser, Peter 2000. “Rhetorical Analysis within a Pragma-dialectical Framework. The Case of R. J. Reynolds,” Argumentation 14 (3): 293–305.
van Eemeren, Frans H. and Houtlosser, Peter 2002. “Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Maintaining a Delicate Balance,” in van Eemeren, F. H. and Houtlosser, Peter (eds.) Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, pp. 131–60.
van Eemeren, Frans H., et al. 1996. Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ekman, Paul 1992. “An Argument for Basic Emotions,” Cognition and Emotion 6: 169–200.
Eze, Emmanuel Chukwudi 2008. On Reason: Rationality in a World of Cultural Conflict and Racism. Durham: Duke University Press.
Fahnestock, J. 2000. “Aristotle and Theories of Figuration,” in Gross, Alan G. and Walzer, Arthur E. (eds.) Rereading Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, pp. 166–84.
Farrell, Thomas B. 1993. Norms of Rhetorical Culture. New Haven: Vale University Press.
Faulkner, Paul 2000. “The Social Character of Testimonial Knowledge,” The Journal of Philosophy 97: 581–601.
Forster, E. M. 1936. “Roger Fry: An Obituary Note’” from Abinger Harvest, London: Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd., pp. 50–53.
Fortenbaugh, W. W. 1975. Aristotle on Emotion: A Contribution to Philosophical Psychology, Rhetoric, Poetics, Politics and Ethics. London: Duckworth.
Foss, Sonja and Griffin, Cindy 1995. “Beyond Persuasion: A Proposal for an Invitational Rhetoric,” Communication Monographs. 62: 2–18.
Frank, David A. 2004. “Argumentation Studies in the Wake of the New Rhetoric,” Argumentation and Advocacy 40: 267–83.
Fraser, Nancy 1992. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy,” in Calhoun, Craig (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 109–142.
Fraser, Nancy 2001. “Recognition without Ethics,” Theory, Culture and Society 18 (2–3): 21–42.
Freeman, James 2005. Acceptable Premises: An Epistemic Approach to an Informal Logic Problem. Cambridge University Press.
Freese, J. H. 1926. Aristotle: Art of Rhetoric. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fricker, Elizabeth 1987. “The Epistemology of Testimony,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 61 (July). Oxford: Basil Blackwell Publisher: 57–83.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg 1975. Truth and Method. New York: The Crossroad Publishing Company.
Gallagher, Shaun 2009. “Philosophical Antecedents of Situated Cognition,” in Robbins, Philip and Aydede, Murat (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge University Press, pp. 35–51.
Garver, Eugene 2009. “Aristotle on the Kinds of Rhetoric,” Rhetorica 27: 1–18.
Gigerenzer, Gerd 2001. “I Think, Therefore I Err,” Social Research 72 (1): 1–24.
Gigerenzer, Gerd 2007. Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious. New York: Viking.
Gilbert, Michael A. 1997. Coalescent Argumentation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Glover, Jonathan 1988. I: The Philosophy and Psychology of Personal Identity. London: Penguin Books.
Gómez, Carlos Miquel 2012. Interculturality, Rationality and Dialogue: In Search for Intercultural Argumentative Criteria for Latin America. Würzburg: Echter Verlag.
Goodnight, Thomas G. 2003. “Predicaments of Communication, Argument, and Power: Towards a Critical Theory of Controversy,” Informal Logic 23 (2): 119–137.
Goodwin, J. 1995. “Perelman, Adhering, and Conviction,” Philosophy and Rhetoric 28: 215–33.
Govier, Trudy 1997. Social Trust and Human Communities. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Govier, Trudy 1998. Dilemmas of Trust. Ottawa: Carleton University Press.
Govier, Trudy 1999. The Philosophy of Argument. Newport News, VA: Vale Press.
Grandy, Richard and Warner, Richard (eds.) 1986. Philosophical Grounds of Rationality: Intentions, Categories, Ends. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Grice, Paul 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Grice, Paul 2001. Aspects of Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Griffiths, Paul and Scarantino, Andrea 2009. “Emotions in the Wild: The Social Perspective on Emotion,” in Robbins and Aydede (eds.), pp. 437–53.
Grimaldi, William 1980. Aristotle, Rhetoric I: A Commentary. New York: Fordham University Press.
Groarke, Leo A. 1996. “Logic, Art and Argument,” Informal Logic 18 (2&3): 105–29.
Gross, Alan G. 2010. “Rhetoric, Narrative, and the Lifeworld: The Constriction of Collective Identity,” Philosophy and Rhetoric 43: 118–38.
Gross, Alan and Dascal, Marcelo 2001. “The Conceptual Unity of Aristotle’s Rhetoric,” Philosophy and Rhetoric 34 (4): 275–291.
Gross, Alan G. and Dearin, Ray D. 2003. Chaim Perelman. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Gross, Daniel 2006. The Secret History of Emotion: From Aristotle’s Rhetoric to Modern Brain Science. University of Chicago Press.
Habermas, Jürgen 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. 2 volumes, Thomas, McCarthy (trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Habermas, Jürgen 1988. On the Logic of the Social Sciences. Shierry Weber, Nicholsen and Stark, Jerry A. (trans.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Habermas, Jürgen 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Thomas, Burger and Frederick, Lawrence (trans.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Habermas, Jürgen 1990. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Christian, Lenhardt and Shierry Weber, Nicholsen (trans.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Habermas, Jürgen 1992. “Further Reflections on the Public Sphere,” in Calhoun, Craig (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 421–61.
Habermas, Jürgen 1993. Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics, Ciaran, Cronin (trans.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Habermas, Jürgen 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, William, Rehg (trans.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Habermas, Jürgen 2000. “From Kant to Hegel: On Robert Brandom’s Pragmatic Philosophy of Language,” European Journal of Philosophy 8 (3): 322–55.
Habermas, Jürgen 2003a. Truth and Justification. Fultner, B. (trans.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Habermas, Jürgen 2003b. The Future of Human Nature. William, Rehg, Hella, Beister and Max, Pensky (trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hall, Stuart 1973. Encoding and Decoding in the Television Discourse. Birmingham: Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies.
Hamblin, C. L. 1970. Fallacies. London: Methuen.
Haraway, Donna 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of the Partial Perspective,” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–99.
Hardin, Russell 2002. Trust and Trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Hardin, Russell 2006. Trust. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hardwig, John 1985. “Epistemic Dependence,” The Journal of Philosophy 82: 335–49.
Hardwig, John 1991. “The Role of Trust in Knowledge,” The Journal of Philosophy 88: 693–708.
Harman, Gilbert 2003. “Aspects of Reason II,” The Philosophical Quarterly 53: 280–84.
Hauser, Gerard A. 2001. “Prisoners of Conscience and the Counterpublic Sphere of Prison Writing: The Stones that Start the Avalanche,” in Asen, Robert and Brouwer, Daniel C. (eds.) Counterpublics and the State. Albany, NY: State University New York Press, pp. 35–58.
Heider, Karl G. 1988. “The Rashomon Effect: When Ethnographers Disagree,” American Anthropologist 90: 73–81.
Hermerén, Göran 1992. “Allusions and Intentions,” in Iseminger, Gary (ed.) Intention and Interpretation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, pp. 203–220.
Hesse, Mary 1995. “Habermas and the Force of Dialectical Argument,” History of European Ideas 21 (3): 367–78.
Hintikka, Jaakko 1986. “Logic of Conversation as a Logic of Dialogue,” in Grandy and Warner (eds.), pp. 259–76.
Hitchcock, David 1995. “Does the Traditional Treatment of Enthymemes Rest on a Mistake?” In Analysis and Evaluation: Proceedings of the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation, vol. 2. van Eemeren, Frans H., et al. (eds.). Amsterdam: Sic Sat, pp. 113–29.
Hitchcock, David 2006. “Informal logic and the Concept of Argument,” in Jacquette, Dale (ed.), Philosophy of Logic, volume 5 of Dov M. Gabbay, Paul Thagard and John Woods (eds.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, Elsevier: pp. 101–29.
Hitchens, Christopher 2010. Hitch 22: A Memoir. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart Ltd.
Hohendahl, Peter 2001. “Jürgen Habermas: “The Public Sphere” (1964),” New German Critique:45–48.
Holub, Robert C. 1984. Reception Theory: A Critical Introduction. New York: Routledge.
Horn, Laurence 1984. “Toward a New Taxonomy for Pragmatic Inference: Q-based and R-based Implicature,” in Schiffrin, Deborah (ed.), Meaning, Form and Use in Context (GURT ’84). Washington: Georgetown University Press, pp. 11–41.
Horn, Laurence 2005. “Current Issues in Neo-Gricean Pragmatics,” Intercultural Pragmatics 2-2: 191–204.
Hume, David 2000. A Treatise on Human Nature. Norton, David Fate and Norton, Mary (eds.). Oxford University Press.
Hume, David 1977. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Steinberg, Eric (ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett.
Hunter, Richard 2006. “Plato’s Symposium and the Traditions of Ancient Fiction,” in Lesher, James, Nails, Debra and Sheffield, Frisbee (eds.) Plato’s Symposium: Issues in Interpretation and Reception. Cambridge, MA: Center for Hellenic Studies, Harvard University Press. pp. 295–312.
Irwin, William 2001. “What is an Allusion?” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 59 (3): 287–97.
Iser, Wolfgang 1978. The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Isocrates, 2000. “Against the Sophists,” in Isocrates I, Mirhady, David C. and Yun Lee, Too (trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press: 61–6.
Jauss, Hans Robert 1982. Towards an Aesthetic of Reception. Timothy, Bahti (trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Johnson, Ralph H. and Blair, J. Anthony 1980. “The Recent Development of Informal Logic,” in Blair, J. A. and Johnson, R. H. (eds.) Informal Logic: The First International Symposium. Inverness, CA: Edgepress, pp. 3–28.
Johnson, Ralph 2000. Manifest Rationality. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Johnson, Ralph 2009. “Revisiting the Logical/Dialectical/Rhetorical Triumvirate,” in Argument Cultures: Proceedings of OSSA’09. Ritola, Juho (ed.). Windsor, ON: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. CD-ROM, pp. 1–13.
Johnstone, H. W. Jr. 1978. Validity and Rhetoric in Philosophical Argument. University Park, PA: Dialogue Press of Man & World.
Johnstone, Steven 2011. A History of Trust in Ancient Greece. University of Chicago Press.
Jost, Walter and Olmsted, Wendy (eds.) 2006. A Companion to Rhetoric and Rhetorical Criticism. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Kant, Immanuel 1951. Critique of Judgment. Bernard, J. H. (trans.). New York: Hafner.
Karon, Louise A. 1976. “Presence in ‘The New Rhetoric’,” Philosophy and Rhetoric 9 (2): 96–111.
Kasterly, James L. 2006. “Pathos: Rhetoric and Emotion,” in Jost and Olmsted, (eds.), pp. 221–37.
Kauffeld, Fred J. 1986. Accusing, Proposing, and Advising: The Strategic Grounds for Presumption and the Assumption of Probative Responsibilities. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Kauffeld, Fred J. 2009. “Grice’s Analysis of Utterance-Meaning and Cicero’s Catilinarian Apostrophe,” Argumentation 23: 239–57.
Kennedy, George 2007. “Introduction” to On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. Kennedy, George A. (Trans. Introduction, Notes, & Appendices). Oxford University Press.
Kochin, Michael S. 2009. “From Argument to Assertion,” Argumentation 23: 387–96.
Kornprobst, Markus 2008. Irredentism in European Politics: Argumentation, Compromise and Norms. Cambridge University Press.
Korsgaard, Christine M. 1996a. The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge University Press.
Korsgaard, Christine M. 1996b. Creating the Kingdom of Ends. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Korsgaard, Christine M. 2008. The Constitution of Agency: Essays on Practical Reason and Moral Psychology. Oxford University Press.
Korsgaard, Christine M. 2009. Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. Oxford University Press.
Kusch, Martin 2002. Knowledge by Agreement: The Programme of Communitarian Epistemology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Lackey, Jennifer 2008. Learning from Words: Testimony as a Source of Knowledge. Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark 1980. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.
Lawson-Tancred, Hugh 1992. The Art of Rhetoric. London: Penguin Classics.
Lazarus, Richard S. 1984. “On the Primacy of Cognition,” American Psychologist 39 (2): 124–29.
Lazarus, Richard S. 2001. “Relational meaning and Discrete Emotions,” in Scherer, Klaus R., Schorr, Angela, and Johnstone, Tom (eds.) Appraisal Processes in Emotion: Theory, Methods, Research. Oxford University Press, pp. 37–67.
Leff, Michael 1983. “Topical Invention and Metaphoric Interaction,” The Southern Speech Communication Journal 48 (3): 214–29.
Leff, Michael 2000. “Rhetoric and Dialectic in the Twenty-First Century,” Argumentation 14: 241–54.
Leighton, Stephen R. 1982. “Aristotle and the Emotions,” Phronesis 27: 144–74.
Leighton, Stephen R. 1985. “A New View of Emotion,” American Philosophical Quarterly 22: 133–41.
Levinson, Stephen 2000. Presumptive Meanings: A Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Locke, John 1975. Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Nidditch, P. H. (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Lodge, David 1990. After Bakhtin: Essays on Fiction and Criticism. New York: Routledge.
Long, Richard 1983. “The Role of Audience in Chaim Perelman’s New Rhetoric,” Journal of Advanced Composition (4): 107–17.
Lukes, Steven 1982. “Of Gods and Demons,” Habermas – Critical Debates, Thompson, John B. and Held, David (eds.) Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 134–48.
McKay, D. S.et al. 1996. “Search for Past Life on Mars: Possible Relic Biogenic Activity in Martian Meteorite ALH84001,” Science Magazine (August 16).
McKerrow, R. E. 1977. “Rhetorical Validity: An Analysis of Three Perspectives on the Justification of Rhetorical Argument,” Journal of the American Forensic Association 13 (3): 133–41.
Mackenzie, Catriona and Stoljar, Natalie 2000. “Autonomy Refigured,” in Mackenzie, C. and Stoljar, N. (eds.) Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self. Oxford University Press, pp. 3–34.
Makowski, Piotr 2009. “Metaphysics of Practical Philosophy: The Concept of Capacity in Aristotle,” Studies on Supernaturalism. Berlin: Logos Verlag: 59–73.
Malcolm, Norman 1959. Dreaming. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Maneli, M. 1994. Perelman’s New Rhetoric as Philosophy and Methodology for the Next Century. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Manguel, Alberto 2013. The Traveler, the Tower, and the Worm: The Reader as Metaphor. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Mercier, Hugo and Sperber, Dan 2011. “Why do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34: 57–111.
Meyer, Michel 2000. Philosophy and the Passions: Toward a History of Human Nature, Barsky, R. F. (trans.) University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Mickunas, A. 1987. “Perelman on Justice and Political Institutions,” in Golden, J. C. and Pilotta, J. J. (eds.) Practical Reasoning in Human Affairs. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Modrak, Deborah K. 1987. Aristotle: The Power of Perception. The University of Chicago Press.
Morton, Adam 2013. Emotion and Imagination. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Natanson, M. and Johnstone, H. W. Jr. 1965. Philosophy, Rhetoric and Argumentation. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Nightingale, Andrea Wilson 2004. Spectacles of Truth in Classical Greek Philosophy: Theoria in its Cultural Context. Cambridge University Press.
O’Gorman, Ned 2005. “Aristotle’s Phantasia in the Rhetoric: Lexis, Appearance and the Epideictic Function of Discourse,” Philosophy and Rhetoric 38: 16–40.
O’Keefe, Daniel 1990. Persuasion: Theory and research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Olmos, Paula 2006. “Making it Public: Testimony and Socially Sanctioned Common Grounds,” Informal Logic 27: 211–27.
Ovid, 1916. Ovid iii: Metamorphoses, Books i-viii. Frank, Justus Miller (trans.). (Loeb Classical Library, No. 42). Harvard University Press.
Penco, Carlo 2008. “Keeping Track of Individuals: Brandom’s Analysis of Kripke’s Puzzle and the Content of Belief,” in Stekeler-Weithofer (ed.), pp. 163–85.
Perelman, Chaim 1949/2003. “First Philosophies and Regressive Philosophy,” Frank, David A. and Bolduc, Michelle K. (trans.). Philosophy and Rhetoric 36: 189–204.
Perelman, Chaim 1963. The Idea of Justice and the Problem of Argument. John, Petrie (trans.). London: Routledge.
Perelman, Chaim 1967. Justice. New York: Random House.
Perelman, Chaim 1979. New Rhetoric and the Humanities. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Co.
Perelman, Chaim 1982. The Realm of Rhetoric, William, Kluback (trans.). University of Notre Dame Press.
Perelman, Chain 1989. “The New Rhetoric and the Rhetoricians: Remembrances and Comments,” in Dearin, R. D. (ed.) The New Rhetoric of Chaim Perelman: Statement and Response. New York: University Press of America, pp. 239–51.
Perelman, Chaim and Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie 1969. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation, John, Wilkinson and Purcell, Weaver (trans.). University of Notre Dame Press.
Plantinga, A. 1993. Warrant: The Current Debate. Oxford University Press.
Plato, 1986. Phaedrus. Rowe, C. J. (trans.). Oxford: Aris & Phillips.
Putnam, Hilary 2002. The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Quante, Michael 2007. “The Social Nature of Personal Identity,” Journal of Consciousness Studies 14: 56–76.
Quine, W. V. O. 1953. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” in From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 20–46.
Quine, W. V. O. 1966. Ways of Paradox. New York: Random House.
Quintilian, 1980. Institutio Oratoria : Books i-iii. Butler, H. E. (trans.). Harvard University Press.
Ray, John W. 1978. “Perelman’s Universal Audience,” Quarterly Journal of Speech 64: 361–75.
Redding, Paul 1989. “Habermas’ Theory of Argumentation,” Journal of Value Inquiry 23 (1): 15–32.
Rée, Jonathan 1999. I See a Voice: Language, Deafness & the Senses – A Philosophical History. London: Harper Collins Publishers Limited.
Rehg, William 2003. “Habermas, Argumentation Theory, and Science Studies: Toward Interdisciplinary Cooperation,” Informal Logic 23 (2): 161–82.
Rehg, William 2009. Cogent Science in Context: The Science Wars, Argumentation Theory, and Habermas. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Reid, Thomas 1983. Thomas Reid’s Inquiry and Essays. Beanblossom, Ronald E. and Lehrer, Keith (eds.). Indianapolis: Hackett.
Richards, I. A. 1936. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press.
Risse, Thomas 2000. “Let’s Argue! Communicative Action in World Politics,” International Organization 54 (1): 1–39.
Robbins, Philip and Aydede, Murat (eds.) 2009. The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge University Press.
Rotenstreich, Nathan 1972. “Argumentation and Philosophical Clarification,” Philosophy and Rhetoric 5 (1): 12–23.
Roth, Wendy D. and Mehta, Jal D. 2002. “The Rashomon Effect: Combining Positivist and Interpretivist Approaches in the Analysis of Contested Events,” Sociological Methods & Research 31: 131–73.
Rubinelli, S. 2009. Ars Topica The Classical Technique of Constructing Arguments from Aristotle to Cicero. Springer.
Rushdie, Salman 2012. Joseph Anton: A Memoir. Toronto: Alfred A. Knopf Canada.
Ryan, Eugene 1984. Aristotle’s Theory of Rhetorical Argumentation. Montreal: Editions Bellarmin.
Saul, Jennifer M. 2002. “What is Said and Psychological Reality: Grice’s Project and Relevance Theorists’ Criticisms,” Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 347–72.
Schiappa, Edward 1999. The Beginnings of Rhetorical Theory in Classical Greece. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Scult, Allen 1976/1989. “Perelman’s Universal Audience: One Perspective,” Central States Speech Journal 27: 176–80. Reprinted in Ray Dearin (ed.) The New Rhetoric of Chaim Perelman: Statement and Response. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, pp. 153–62.
Searle, John 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.
Sellars, Wilfrid 1997. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sen, Amartya 1999. Reason before Identity. Oxford University Press.
Sen, Amartya 2004. “Capabilities, Lists, and Public Reason: Continuing the Conversation,” Feminist Economics 10: 77–80.
Sen, Amartya 2006. Identity and Violence. New York: W.W. Norton.
Sidgewick, Alfred 1883. Fallacies: A View of Logic from the Practical Side. London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Co.
Siegel, Harvey 1997. Rationality Redeemed?: Further Dialogues on an Educational Ideal. New York: Routledge.
Smith, Michael 1987. “The Humean Theory of Motivation,” Mind (96): 36–61.
Sokal, A. and Bricmont, J. 1998. Intellectual Imposters: Postmodern Philosophers’ Abuse of Science. London: Profile Books.
Solomon, Robert C. 1977. The Passions. New York: Anchorage Books.
Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deidre 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Spivey, Michael 2007. The Continuity of the Mind. Oxford University Press.
Stampe, Dennis W. 1967. On the Acoustic Behavior of Rational Animals. Photocopy. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.
Stekeler-Weithofer, Pirmin (ed.) 2008. The Pragmatics of Making it Explicit. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Surowiecki, James 2004. The Wisdom of the Crowds. New York: Anchor Books.
Thagard, Paul 2000. Coherence in Thought and Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Thagard, Paul 2005. “Testimony, Credibility, and Explanatory Coherence,” Erkenntnis 63: 295–316.
Thagard, Paul 2006. Hot Thought: Mechanisms and Applications of Emotional Cognition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Thagard, Paul 2012. The Cognitive Science of Science: Explanation, Discovery, and Conceptual Change. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Tindale, Christopher W. 1999a. Acts of Arguing. New York: State University of New York Press.
Tindale, Christopher W. 1999b. “The Authority of Testimony,” ProtoSociology 13: 96–116.
Tindale, Christopher W. 2004. Rhetorical Argumentation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Tindale, Christopher W. 2006a. “Perelman, Informal Logic and the Historicity of Reason,” Informal Logic 26 (2): 341–57.
Tindale, Christopher W. 2006b. “Constrained Maneuvering: Rhetoric as a Rational Enterprise,” Argumentation 20: 447–66.
Tindale, Christopher W. 2010. Reason’s Dark Champions: Constructive Strategies of Sophistic Argument. Columbia, SC: The University of South Carolina Press.
Tindale, Christopher W. 2011. “Out of the Space of Reasons: Argumentation, Agents, and Persons.” Pragmatics and Cognition 13 (3): 383–98.
Tindale, Christopher W. and Gough, James 1987. “The Use of Irony in Argumentation,” Philosophy and Rhetoric 20: 1–17.
Toulmin, Stephen 1958. The Uses of Argument (2nd edition 2003). Cambridge University Press.
Toulmin, Stephen 1972. Human Understanding. Princeton University Press.
Toulmin, Stephen 1990. Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity. University of Chicago Press.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2004. “A Critique of Levinson’s View of Q- and M-inferences in Historical Pragmatics,” A Journal of Historical Pragmatics 5: 1–26.
Tversky, Amos and Kahneman, Daniel 1974. “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,” Science 185: 1124–31.
Van Gelder, T. 1995. “What might cognition be, if not computation?” Journal of Philosophy 91: 345–81.
Von Radziewsky, Katharina and Tindale, C. W. 2012. “Arguments for Rhetorical Arguments: A Response to Aikin,” Cogency 4 (1): 91–119.
Walton, Douglas 1998. Ad Hominem Arguments. Tuscaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama Press.
Walton, Douglas and Krabbe, Erik 1995. Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Wanderer, Jeremy 2008. Robert Brandom. Stocksfield: Acumen Publishing Limited.
Weidemann, Hermann 1989. “Aristotle on Inferences from Signs,” Phronesis 34: 343–51.
Whately, Richard 1963. Elements of Rhetoric. Ehninger, Douglas (ed.) Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Willard, C. A. 1990. “Authority,” Informal Logic 12: 11–22.
Wilson, Deirdre and Sperber, Dan 1981. “On Grice’s Theory of Conversation,” in Werth, Paul (ed.) Conversation and Discourse: Structure and Interpretation. London: Croom Helm, pp. 155–78.
Wilson, Deirdre and Sperber, Dan 1986. “On Defining Relevance,” in Grandy and Warner (eds.), pp. 243–58.
Wilson, Deirdre and Sperber, Dan 2012. Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, Emily 2007. The Death of Socrates. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Young, Iris Marion 1997. “Difference as a Resource for Democratic Communication,” in Bonham, James and Rehg, William (eds.) Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 383–406.
