References
Arageorgis, Aristidis, Earman, John, and Ruetsche, Laura. 2003. Fulling non-uniqueness and the Unruh effect: A primer on some aspects of quantum field theory. Philosophy of Science, 70(1):164–202.
Aydemir, Ufuk, Anber, Mohamed M, and Donoghue, John F. 2012. Self-healing of unitarity in effective field theories and the onset of new physics. Physical Review D, 86(1):014025.
Bain, Jonathan. 2013. Effective field theories. In Batterman, Robert W, ed., The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Physics, pages 224–254. Oxford University Press.
Baker, David John. 2009. Against field interpretations of quantum field theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 60(3):585–609.
Barbieri, Riccardo. 2013. Electroweak theory after the first LHC phase. arXiv preprint: 1309.3473.
Batterman, Robert W. 2000. Multiple realizability and universality. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 51(1):115–145.
Batterman, Robert W. 2001. The Devil in the Details: Asymptotic Reasoning in Explanation, Reduction, and Emergence. Oxford University Press.
Batterman, Robert W. 2018. Autonomy of theories: An explanatory problem. Noûs, 52(4):858–873.
Batterman, Robert W. 2019. Universality and RG explanations. Perspectives on Science, 27(1):26–47.
Batterman, Robert W. 2021. A Middle Way: A Non-Fundamental Approach to Many-Body Physics. Oxford University Press.
Benfatto, Giuseppe, and Gallavotti, Giovanni. 1995. Renormalization Group. Princeton University Press.
Blanchard, Thomas. 2020. Explanatory abstraction and the goldilocks problem: Interventionism gets things just right. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 71: 633–663.
Blum, Alexander S. 2017. The state is not abolished, it withers away: How quantum field theory became a theory of scattering. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 60:46–80.
Borrelli, Arianna, and Castellani, Elena. 2019. The practice of naturalness: A historical-philosophical perspective. Foundations of Physics, 49(9):860–878.
Bousso, Raphael. 2005. Cosmology and the S matrix. Physical Review D, 71(6):064024.
Boyd, Nora Mills. 2021. Epistemology of Experimental Physics (Elements in the Philosophy of Physics). Cambridge University Press.
Brivio, Ilaria, and Trott, Michael. 2019. The standard model as an effective field theory. Physics Reports, 793:1–98.
Burgess, Cliff. 2021. Introduction to Effective Field Theory: Thinking Effectively about Hierarchies of Scale (1st ed. ). Cambridge University Press.
Butterfield, Jeremy. 2011. Less is different: Emergence and reduction reconciled. Foundations of Physics, 41(6):1065–1135.
Butterfield, Jeremy. 2014. Reduction, emergence, and renormalization. The Journal of Philosophy, 111(1):5–49.
Butterfield, Jeremy, and Bouatta, Nazim. 2015. Renormalization for philosophers. In Bigaj, Tomasz and Wüthrich, Christian (eds.). Metaphysics in Contemporary Physics, volume 104 of Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, pages 437–485. Brill.
Cardy, John. 1996. Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics. Cambridge University Press.
Chakravartty, Anjan. 2007. A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism: Knowing the Unobservable. Cambridge University Press.
Chen, Lu. 2022. Can we “effectivize” spacetime? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science: 75–83.
Clifton, Rob, and Halvorson, Hans. 2001. Entanglement and open systems in algebraic quantum field theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 32(1):1–31.
Cohen, Timothy. 2020. As scales become separated: Lectures on effective field theory. arXiv preprint: 1903.03622.
Coleman, Sidney. 1985. Aspects of Symmetry: Selected Erice Lectures. Cambridge University Press.
Coleman, Sidney. 2019. Quantum Field Theory: Lectures of Sidney Coleman. World Scientific.
Collins, John C. 1984. Renormalization: An Introduction to Renormalization, the Renormalization Group, and the Operator-Product Expansion. Cambridge University Press.
Contino, Roberto, Falkowski, Adam, Goertz, Florian, Grojean, Christophe, and Riva, Francesco. 2016. On the validity of the effective field theory approach to SM precision tests. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2016(7):1–26.
Crispino, Luis CB, Higuchi, Atsushi, and Matsas, George EA. 2008. The Unruh effect and its applications. Reviews of Modern Physics, 80(3):787–838.
Davidson, Sacha, Gambino, Paolo, Laine, Mikko, Neubert, Matthias, and Salomon, Christophe. 2020. Effective Field Theory in Particle Physics and Cosmology: Lecture Notes of the Les Houches Summer School: Volume 108, July 2017. Oxford University Press.
de Rham, Claudia, Kundu, Sandipan, Reece, Matthew, Tolley, Andrew J, and Zhou, Shuang-Yong. 2022. Snowmass white paper: UV constraints on IR physics. arXiv preprint: 2203.06805.
Delamotte, Bertrand. 2012. An introduction to the nonperturbative renormalization group. In Schwenk, Achim, Polonyi, Janos (eds.). Renormalization Group and Effective Field Theory Approaches to Many-Body Systems, pages 49–132. Springer.
Dirac, Paul AM. 1933/2005. The Lagrangian in quantum mechanics. In Brown, Laurie M, ed., Feynman’s Thesis: A New Approach to Quantum Theory, pages 111–119. World Scientific.
Duncan, Anthony. 2012. The Conceptual Framework of Quantum Field Theory. Oxford University Press.
Earman, John. 2011. The Unruh effect for philosophers. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 42(2):81–97.
Earman, John, and Fraser, Doreen. 2006. Haag’s theorem and its implications for the foundations of quantum field theory. Erkenntnis, 64(3):305–344.
Ellis, John, Murphy, Christopher W, Sanz, Verónica, and You, Tevong. 2018. Updated global SMEFT fit to Higgs, diboson and electroweak data. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2018(6):1–34.
Esfeld, Michael. 2009. The modal nature of structures in ontic structural realism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 23(2):179–194.
Feynman, Richard. 1948. Space-time approach to non-relativistic quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 20(2):367–387.
Forgione, Marco. 2020. Path integrals and holism. Foundations of Physics, 50(8):799–827.
Franklin-Hall, Laura. 2016. High-level explanation and the interventionist’s “variables problem.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 67(2):553–577.
Fraser, Doreen. 2008. The fate of “particles” in quantum field theories with interactions. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 39(4):841–859.
Fraser, Doreen. 2009. Quantum field theory: Underdetermination, inconsistency, and idealization. Philosophy of Science, 76(4):536–567.
Fraser, Doreen. 2011. How to take particle physics seriously: A further defence of axiomatic quantum field theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 42(2):126–135.
Fraser, Doreen. 2021. Particles in quantum field theory. In Knox, Eleanor and Wilson, Alistair, eds., The Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Physics, pages 232–336. Routledge.
Fraser, James D. 2018. Renormalization and the formulation of scientific realism. Philosophy of Science, 85(5):1164–1175.
Fraser, James D. 2020. Towards a realist view of quantum field theory. In French, Steven and Saatsi, Juha, eds., Scientific Realism and the Quantum, pages 276–291. Oxford University Press.
Georgi, Howard. 1993. Effective field theory. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 43(1):209–252.
Giudice, Gian F. 2013. Naturalness after LHC8. arXiv preprint: 1307.7879.
Giudice, Gian Francesco. 2017. The dawn of the post-naturalness era. arXiv preprint: 1710.07663.
Haag, Rudolf. 1996. Local Quantum Physics (2nd ed.). Springer.
Halvorson, Hans. 2001. Reeh–Schlieder defeats Newton–Wigner: On alternative localization schemes in relativistic quantum field theory. Philosophy of Science, 68(1):111–133.
Halvorson, Hans, and Clifton, Rob. 2002. No place for particles in relativistic quantum theories? Philosophy of Science, 69(1):1–28.
Henning, Brian, Lu, Xiaochuan, and Murayama, Hitoshi. 2016. How to use the standard model effective field theory. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2016(1):1–97.
Itzykson, Claude, and Zuber, Jean-Bernard. 1980. Quantum Field Theory. McGraw-Hill.
Kaiser, David. 2009. Drawing Theories Apart. University of Chicago Press.
Kitcher, Philip. 1993. The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. Oxford University Press.
Kuhlmann, Meinard. 2010. Why conceptual rigour matters to philosophy: On the ontological significance of algebraic quantum field theory. Foundations of Physics, 40(9–10):1625–1637.
Ladyman, James, Ross, Don, Spurrett, David, and Collier, John. 2007, Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford University Press.
Laudan, Larry. 1981. A confutation of convergent realism. Philosophy of Science, 48:19–49.
Lee, Benjamin W, Quigg, Ch, and Thacker, HB. 1977a. Strength of weak interactions at very high energies and the Higgs boson mass. Physical Review Letters, 38(16):883–885.
Lee, Benjamin W, Quigg, Chris, and Thacker, HB. 1977b. Weak interactions at very high energies: The role of the Higgs-boson mass. Physical Review D, 16(5):1519–1531.
Malament, David. 1996. In defense of dogma: Why there cannot be a relativistic quantum mechanics of (localizable) particles. In Clifton, Rob, ed., Perspectives on Quantum Reality, pages 1–10. Springer.
Manohar, Aneesh. 2020. Introduction to effective field theories. In Davidson, Sacha, Gambino, Paolo, Laine, Mikko, Neubert, Matthias, and Salomon, Christophe, eds., Effective Field Theory in Particle Physics and Cosmology: Lecture Notes of the Les Houches Summer School: Volume 108, July 2017. pages 47–136. Oxford University Press.
Miller, Michael E. 2018. Haag’s theorem, apparent inconsistency, and the empirical adequacy of quantum field theory. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 69(3):801–820.
Mukhanov, Viatcheslav, and Winitzki, Sergei. 2007. Introduction to Quantum Effects in Gravity. Cambridge University Press.
Penco, Riccardo. 2020. An introduction to effective field theories. arXiv preprint: 2006.16285.
Peskin, Michael, and Schroeder, Daniel. 1995. An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory. Westview Press.
Petrov, Alexey A, and Blechman, Andrew E. 2016. Effective Field Theories. World Scientific.
Polchinski, Joseph. 1984. Renormalization and effective lagrangians. Nuclear Physics B, 231(2):269–295.
Psillos, Stathis. 1999. Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. Routledge.
Redhead, Michael. 1995. More ado about nothing. Foundations of Physics, 25(1):123–137.
Remmen, Grant N, and Rodd, Nicholas L. 2019. Consistency of the standard model effective field theory. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2019(12):1–52.
Rivat, Sébastien. 2019. Renormalization scrutinized. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 68:23–39.
Rivat, Sébastien, and Grinbaum, Alexei. 2020. Philosophical foundations of effective field theories. The European Physical Journal A, 56(3):1–10.
Roberts, Bryan W. 2011. Group structural realism. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 62(1):47–69.
Rosaler, Joshua, and Harlander, Robert. 2019. Naturalness, Wilsonian renormalization, and “fundamental parameters” in quantum field theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 66:118–134.
Ruetsche, Laura. 2011. Interpreting Quantum Theories. Oxford University Press.
Ruetsche, Laura. 2018. Renormalization group realism: The ascent of pessimism. Philosophy of Science, 85(5):1176–1189.
Ruetsche, Laura. 2020. Perturbing realism. In French, Steven and Saatsi, Juha, eds., Scientific Realism and the Quantum, pages 293–314. Oxford University Press.
Ryder, Lewis H. 1996. Quantum Field Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Saatsi, Juha. 2022. (In)effective realism. European Journal of Philosophy of Science, 12:1–16.
Sachdev, Subir. 2011. Quantum Phase Transitions. Cambridge University Press.
Schwartz, Matthew D. 2014. Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model. Cambridge University Press.
Schweber, Silvan S. 1994. QED and the Men Who Made It: Dyson, Feynman, Schwinger, and Tomonaga. Princeton University Press.
Sebens, Charles. 2022. The fundamentality of fields. Synthese, 200, 380.
Shifman, Mikhail. 2012. Advanced Topics in Quantum Field Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Srednicki, Mark. 2007. Quantum Field Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Streater, Ray F, and Wightman, Arthur S. 1964. PCT, Spin and Statistics, and All That. W. A. Benjamin.
Strocchi, Franco. 2013. An Introduction to Non-Perturbative Foundations of Quantum Field Theory. Oxford University Press.
Swanson, Noel. 2017. A philosopher’s guide to the foundations of quantum field theory. Philosophy Compass, 12(5): e12414.
Swanson, Noel. forthcoming. Philosophy of Quantum Field Theory (Elements in the Philosophy of Physics). Cambridge University Press.
Tan, Peter. 2019. Counterpossible non-vacuity in scientific practice. The Journal of Philosophy, 116(1):32–60.
van Fraassen, Bas. 1980. The Scientific Image. Oxford University Press.
Wald, Robert M. 1994. Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime and Black Hole Thermodynamics. University of Chicago Press.
Weinberg, Steven. 1977. The search for unity: Notes for a history of quantum field theory. Daedalus: Volume 06, 17–35.
Weinberg, Steven. 1983. Why the renormalization group is a good thing. In Guth, Alan, Huang, Kerson, and Jaffe, Robert L, eds., Asymptotic Realms of Physics: Essays in Honor of Francis Low, pages 1–19. The MIT Press.
Weinberg, Steven. 1995. The Quantum Theory of Fields, volume 1: Foundations. Cambridge University Press.
Wells, James D. 2015. The utility of naturalness, and how its application to quantum electrodynamics envisages the standard model and Higgs boson. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 49:102–108.
Williams, Porter. 2015. Naturalness, the autonomy of scales, and the 125 GeV Higgs. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 51:82–96.
Williams, Porter. 2017. Scientific realism made effective. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 70:209–237.
Williams, Porter. 2019. Two notions of naturalness. Foundations of Physics, 49(9):1022–1050.
Wilson, Alastair. 2021. Counterpossible reasoning in physics. Philosophy of Science, 88(5):1113–1124.
Wilson, Kenneth G, and Kogut, John. 1974. The renormalization group and the ɛ expansion. Physics Reports, 12(2):75–199.
Wimsatt, William C. 2007. Re-Engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings: Piecewise Approximations to Reality. Harvard University Press.
Witten, Edward. 2001. Quantum gravity in de Sitter space. arXiv preprint: hep-th/0106109.
Witten, Edward. 2018. APS medal for exceptional achievement in research: Invited article on entanglement properties of quantum field theory. Reviews of Modern Physics, 90(4):045003.
Woodward, James. 2021a. Causation with a Human Face. Oxford University Press.
Woodward, James. 2021b. Explanatory autonomy: The role of proportionality, stability, and conditional irrelevance. Synthese, 198(1):237–265.
Worrall, John. 1989. Structural realism: The best of both worlds? Dialectica, 43:99–124.
Yablo, Stephen. 1992. Mental causation. The Philosophical Review, 101(2):245–280.
Zee, Anthony. 2010. Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
