Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 7
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
December 2024
Print publication year:
2025
Online ISBN:
9781009180559

Book description

Kant's main work in the philosophy of law – the Doctrine of Right (1797) – is notoriously difficult for modern readers to understand. Kant clearly argues that rightful relations between human beings can only be achieved if we enter into a civil legal condition taking a defined constitutional form. In this Element, we emphasise that Kant considers this claim to be a postulate of practical reason, thus identifying the pure idea of the state as the culmination of his entire practical philosophy. The Doctrine of Right makes sense as an attempt to clarify the content of the postulate of public right and constructively interpret existing domestic and international legal arrangements in the light of the noumenal republic it postulates. Properly understood, Kant's postulate of public right is the epistemological foundation of a non-positivist legal theory that remains of central significance to modern legal philosophy and legal doctrinal method.

Bibliography

Achenwall, G., Natural Law: A Translation of the Textbook for Kant’s Lectures on Legal and Political Philosophy (5th ed. 1763), Kleingeld, P. (ed.), Vermeulen, C. (trans.) with an Introduction by P. Guyer (London: Bloomsbury, 2020).
Alexy, R., The Argument from Injustice (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002).
Alexy, R., ‘Kant’s Non-Positivistic Concept of Law’ (2019) 24 Kantian Review 497512.
Allison, H., Kant’s Theory of Freedom and Kant’s Conception of Freedom: A Developmental and Critical Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020).
Arendt, H., Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1992).
Austin, J., The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (1832), Rumble, W. (ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).
Bacin, S., ‘Kant’s Lectures on Ethics and Baumgarten’s Moral Philosophy’, in Denis, L. and Sensen, O. (eds.), Kant’s Lectures on Ethics: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 1533.
Baumgarten, I. and Kant, I., Baumgarten’s Elements of First Practical Philosophy: A Critical Translation with Kant’s Reflections on Moral Philosophy (1760), Fugate, C. and Hymes, J. (trans.) (London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2020).
Bederman, D., International Law in Antiquity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).
Bentham, J., ‘Nonsense upon Stilts or Pandora’s Box Opened’, in Schofield, P., Pease-Watkin, C. and Blamires, C. (eds.), The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002), 318402.
Brown, S., ‘Has Kant a Philosophy of Law’ (1962) 71 The Philosophical Review 3348.
Burlamaqui, J. J., The Principles of Natural and Politic Law (1747–8), Nugent, T. (trans.) and P. Korkman (ed.) (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 2006).
Byrd, S. and Hruschka, J., Kant’s ‘Doctrine of Right’: A Commentary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).
Capps, P. and Rivers, J., ‘Kant’s Concept of International Law’ (2010) 16 Legal Theory 229–57.
Capps, P. and Rivers, J., ‘Kant’s Concept of Law’ (2018) 63 American Journal of Jurisprudence 259–94.
Capps, P. and Rivers, J., ‘Kant’s Postulate of Public Right and Contemporary Legal Theory’ (2025, forthcoming).
Caranti, L., The Kantian Federation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022).
Cassirer, E., Rousseau, Kant, Goethe: Two Essays (New York: Harper & Row, 1963).
Chignell, A., ‘Belief in Kant’ (2007) 116 The Philosophical Review 323–60.
Clark, C., The Iron Kingdom (London: Penguin, 2006).
de Lolme J. L, . , The Constitution of England (4th ed. 1784), Lieberman, D. (ed.) (Carmel, IN: Liberty Fund, 2007).
Dworkin, R., A Matter of Principle (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985).
Dworkin, R., Law’s Empire (London: Fontana Press, 1986).
Dworkin, R., Justice in Robes (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press, 2006).
Fenve, P., Late Kant: Towards Another Law of the Earth (London: Routledge, 2003).
Flikschuh, K. and Ypi, L. (eds.), Kant and Colonialism: Historical and Critical Perspectives (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).
Gregory, M., ‘Kant’s Naturrecht Feyerabend, Achenwall and the Role of the State’ (2021) 13 Kant Yearbook 4971.
Grotius, H., The Rights of War and Peace, Tuck, R. (ed.) (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2006).
Guyer, P., ‘“Hobbes is of the opposite opinion” Kant and Hobbes on the Three Authorities in the State’ (2012) 25 Hobbes Studies 91119.
Guyer, P., Kant on Freedom, Law and Happiness (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).
Guyer, P., ‘Achenwall, Kant, and the Division of Governmental Powers’, in Ruffing, M., Schlitte, A. and Bordoni, G. Sadun (eds.), Kants Naturrecht Feyerabend (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2020), 201–28.
Haakonssen, K., ‘German Natural Law’, in Goldie, M. and Wokler, R. (eds.), Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 251–90.
Habermas, J., Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Rehg, W. (trans.) (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988).
Hall, J., ‘International Relations’, in Sabin, P., van Wees, H. and Whitby, M. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Warfare Volume 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 87107.
Hart, H., Essays on Bentham: Jurisprudence and Political Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982).
Hart, H., The Concept of Law (3rd ed.) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2012).
Hochstrasser, T. J., Natural Law Theories in the Early Enlightenment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).
Kaufman, A., Welfare in the Kantian State (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).
Kersting, W., Wohlgeordnete Freiheit (2nd ed.) (Frankfurt a. Main: Suhrkamp, 2016).
Kelsen, H., Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory (1934) Paulson, B. Litschewski and Paulson, S. (trans.) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).
Koskenniemi, M., To the Uttermost Parts of the Earth: Legal Imagination and International Power 1300–1870 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021).
Kramer, M., In Defence of Legal Positivism (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2003).
Kümin, B. and Würgler, A., ‘Petitions, Gravamina and the Early Modern State: Local Influence on Central Legislation in England and Germany (Hesse)’ (1997) 17 Parliaments, Estates & Representation 3960.
Kuehn, M., Kant: Eine Biographie (München: C. H. Beck, 2003).
Kuehn, M., Kant: A Biography (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).
Kuehn, M., ‘Collins: Kant’s Proto-Critical Position’, in Denis, L. and Sensen, O. (eds.), Kant’s Lectures on Ethics: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 5167.
Ladd, J., Metaphysical Elements of Justice (London: MacMillan, 1965).
Locke, J., Two Treatises on Government (1690), Laslett, P. (ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).
Ludwig, B., ‘“The Right of a State” in Immanuel Kant’s Doctrine of Right’ (1990) 28 Journal of the History of Philosophy 403–15.
Ludwig, B., Kants Rechtslehre (2nd ed.) (Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 2005).
Ludwig, B., Immanuel Kant, Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre (4th ed.) (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2018).
Madison, J., Hamilton, A. and Jay, J., The Federalist Papers (1788) (London: Penguin, 1987).
Maliks, R., Kant and the French Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022).
Manfred, K., Kant: Eine Biographie (München: C. H. Beck, 2003).
Marx, K., ‘Difference between the Democritean and Epicurean Philosophy of Nature’, in Cohen, Jack, Comforth, Maurice, Dobb, Maurice, et al. (eds.) and Struik, Dirk J. and Struik, Sally R. (trans.), Karl Marx Frederick Engels Collected Works Volume 1 (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1975).
Montesquieu, C., The Spirit of the Laws, Cohler, A., Miller, B. and Stone, H. (eds.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).
Murphy, M., Natural Law in Jurisprudence and Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).
O’Neill, O., Constructing Authorities: Reason, Politics and Interpretation in Kant’s Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).
O’Neill, O., ‘Kant and the Social Contract Tradition’, in Constructing Authorities: Reason, Politics and Interpretation in Kant’s Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), 170–85.
Neuhouser, F., Foundations of Hegel’s Social Theory: Actualizing Freedom (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000).
Ossipow, W., ‘Research Note: Kant’s Perpetual Peace and Its Hidden Sources: A Textual Approach’ (2008) 14 Swiss Political Science Review 357–89.
Pinkard, T., German Philosophy 1760–1860: The Legacy of Idealism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).
Postema, G., Bentham and the Common Law Tradition (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986).
Rauscher, F., Naturalism and Realism in Kant’s Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).
Raz, J., The Authority of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979).
Raz, J., ‘The Purity of the Pure Theory’ (1983) 37 Revue Internationale de Philosophie 442–59.
Ripstein, A., Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009).
Rivers, J., ‘Natural Law, Human Rights and the Separation of Powers’, in Angier, T., Benson, I. T. and Retter, M. D. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Natural Law and Human Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023), 308–23.
Rosen, A., Kant’s Theory of Justice (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993).
Rousseau, J. J., Discourse on Political Economy (1755), Betts, C. (ed.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994).
Rousseau, J. J., The Social Contract (1762), Betts, C. (ed.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994).
Simmonds, N., Law as a Moral Idea (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).
Stolleis, M., Geschichte des öffentlichen Rechts in Deutschland, Bd. I (1600–1800) (München: C. H. Beck, 2012).
Tierney, B., Liberty & Law: The Idea of Permissive Natural Law, 1100–1800 (Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2014).
Timmermann, J., ‘Mrongovius II: A Supplement to the Groundwork’, in Denis, L. and Sensen, O. (eds.), Kant’s Lectures on Ethics: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014) 6883.
Unruh, P., Die Herrschaft der Vernunft (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2016).
Vorländer, K., Immanuel Kant: Der Mann and das Werk (Leipzig: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1924).
Waldron, J., ‘Kant’s Legal Positivism’ (1996) 109 Harvard Law Review 1535–66.
Warda, A., Immanuel Kant’s Bücher (Berlin: Martin Breslauer Verlag, 1922).
Waxman, W., Kant’s Anatomy of the Intelligent Mind (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).
Westphal, K., ‘A Kantian Justification of Possession’, in Timmons, M. (ed.), Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretive Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), 89110, ch. 4.
Willaschek, M., ‘Why the Doctrine of Right Does Not Belong in the Metaphysics of Morals’ (1997) 5 Jarbuch für Recht und Ethik 205–27.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.