Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Publishing Scholarly Editions
  • Cited by 6
    • Reviews and endorsements for this Element
      • Show more authors
      • You may already have access via personal or institutional login
    • Select format
    • Publisher:
      Cambridge University Press
      Publication date:
      05 November 2021
      02 December 2021
      ISBN:
      9781108766739
      9781108720182
      DOI:
      https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108766739
      Dimensions:
      Weight & Pages:
      Dimensions:
      (178 x 127 mm)
      Weight & Pages:
      0.15kg, 148 Pages
      • Subjects:
      Literature, Printing and Publishing History, Literary Theory
      Series:
      Elements in Publishing and Book Culture
    You may already have access via personal or institutional login
    • Selected: Digital
    Add to cart View cart Buy from Cambridge.org
    Subjects:
    Literature, Printing and Publishing History, Literary Theory
    Series:
    Elements in Publishing and Book Culture
    Information

    Book description

    Publishing Scholarly Editions offers new intellectual tools for publishing digital editions that bring readers closer to the experimental practices of literature, editing, and reading. After the Introduction (Section 1), Sections 2 and 3 frame intentionality and data analysis as intersubjective, interrelated, and illustrative of experience-as-experimentation. These ideas are demonstrated in two editorial exhibitions of nineteenth-century works: Herman Melville's Billy Budd, Sailor, and the anti-slavery anthology The Bow in the Cloud, edited by Mary Anne Rawson. Section 4 uses pragmatism to rethink editorial principles and data modelling, arguing for a broader conception of the edition rooted in data collections and multimedia experience. The Conclusion (Section 5) draws attention to the challenges of publishing digital editions, and why digital editions have failed to be supported by the publishing industry. If publications are conceived as pragmatic inventions based on reliable, open-access data collections, then editing can embrace the critical, aesthetic, and experimental affordances of editions of experience.

    Reviews

    ‘In Publishing Scholarly Editions, Christopher Ohge cogently argues for approaching editing in pragmatic terms, explicitly invoking the ideas of William James and John Dewey. Such an approach emphasizes the complexities of writerly acts, publishing exigencies, and readerly interpretations and charts the networks of actions and practices that constitute literary experience. Through a lucid contribution to editorial theory and deftly articulated case studies, Ohge shows the opportunities that scholarly editing and especially digital editing provide for displaying these complexities and networks and opening up, rather than closing down, meaning.’

    Samuel Otter - Professor and Slusser Chair in English at the University of California and author of Melville’s Anatomies

    ‘Ohge foregrounds minimal computing as one way to navigate the dilemma pitting editing against publishing. But his objective in this engaging and thought-provoking book - one necessary for our juncture in time - is to raise questions more than to offer answers (certainly not easy ones). Indeed, the last chapter raises a question that is critical to the future of scholarly editing: ‘What, then, is the meaning and function of the publisher in the digital age?’ (116). In reality, this question is essential to the future of humanistic scholarship generally, and Ohge’s probing exploration of it is one of the most important dimensions of his book.’

    Geoffrey Turnovsky Source: Textual Cultures

    References

    References

    Ahnert, R., Ahnert, S. E., Coleman, C., and Weingart, S. B., The Network Turn (Cambridge University Press, 2020).
    Almas, B., Khazraee, E., Miller, M. T., and Westgard, J., ‘Manuscript Study in Digital Spaces: The State of the Field and New Ways Forward’, Digital Humanities Quarterly 12.2 (2018), http://digitalhumanities.org:8081/dhq/vol/12/2/000374/000374.html.
    Amis, K., Lucky Jim (Penguin, 2000).
    Andrews, T., ‘The Third Way’, Variants 10 (2013), 61–76.
    Anscombe, E., Intention (Oxford University Press, 1957).
    Antonini, A., Benatti, F., and Blackburn-Daniels, S., ‘On Links To Be’, 31st ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (13–15 July 2020), Online, http://oro.open.ac.uk/70781/1/on%20links%20to%20be.pdf.
    Aristotle, Rhetoric, ed. W. D. Ross (Clarendon Press, 1959), accessed on the Perseus Digital Library, ed. G. R. Crane, www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0086.tlg038.
    Audi, R. (ed.), ‘Ontological commitment’, in The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, 1999).
    Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S., and Blythe, M. A. (eds.), Critical Theory and Interaction Design (MIT Press, 2018).
    Barnes, L., and Gatti, R., ‘The Cost of Open Access Books: A Publisher Writes’ (28 May 2020), http://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0173.0143.
    Berners-Lee, T., ‘Hypertext and Our Collective Destiny’ (1995), www.w3.org/Talks/9510_Bush/Talk.html.
    Berners-Lee, T., ‘Linked Data’, www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html.
    Bernstein, R. J., The Pragmatic Turn (Polity Press, 2010).
    Beshero-Bondar, E., and Donovan-Condron, K., ‘Modelling Mary Russell Mitford’s Networks’, in A. O. Winckles and A. Rehbein (eds.), Women’s Literary Networks and Romanticism (Liverpool University Press, 2018).
    Blackburn, S., Truth (Profile, 2017).
    Blackwell, A., ‘What Does Digital Content Mean? Umberto Eco and The Open Work’, in Bardzell, Bardzell, and Blythe (eds.), Critical Theory and Interaction Design, pp. 167–86.
    Blaney, J., Milligan, S., Steer, M., and Winters, J., Doing Digital History: A Beginner’s Guide to Working with Text as Data (University of Manchester Press, 2021).
    Bodard, G., and Stoyanova, S., ‘Epigraphers and Encoders: Strategies for Teaching and Learning Digital Epigraphy’, in G. Bodard and M. Romanello (eds.), Digital Classics Outside the Echo-Chamber (Ubiquity Press, 2016), doi: https://doi.org/10.5334/bat.
    Bodard, G., and Yordanova, P., ‘Publication, Testing and Visualization with EFES: A Tool for All Stages of the EpiDoc XML Editing Process’, Digitalia 65.1 (2020), https://doi.org/10.24193/subbdigitalia.2020.1.02.
    Bode, K., ‘The Equivalence of “Close” and “Distant” Reading; or, Toward a New Object for Data-Rich Literary History’, Modern Language Quarterly 78.1 (2017), 77–106.
    Bode, K., Reading by Numbers (Anthem, 2012).
    Bode, K., ‘Why You Can’t Model Away Bias’, Modern Language Quarterly 81.1 (2020), 95–124.
    Bordalejo, B., ‘Digital versus Analogue Textual Scholarship or The Revolution Is Just in the Title’, Digital Philology: A Journal of Medieval Cultures 7.1 (Spring 2018), 7–28.
    Bowers, F., Bibliography and Textual Criticism (Clarendon, 1964).
    Bowles, P., Conversations with Paul Bowles, ed. Caponi, G. (University Press of Mississippi, 1993).
    Box, G. E. P., and Luceño, A., Statistical Control: By Monitoring and Feedback Adjustment (John Wiley & Sons, 1997).
    Brandom, R., Between Saying and Doing: Toward an Analytic Pragmatism (Oxford University Press, 2008).
    Brentano, F., Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt [Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint] (Duncker & Humblot, 1874).
    Brooks, G., To Disembark (Third World Press, 1981).
    Brown, D., ‘William Lloyd Garrison, Transatlantic Abolitionism and Colonisation in the Mid Nineteenth Century: The Revival of the Peculiar Solution?’, Slavery and Abolition 33.2 (2012), 233–50.
    Browne, T., A True and Full Coppy of That Which Was Most Imperfectly and Surreptitiously Printed Before under the Name of: Religio Medici (London, 1643).
    Bryant, J., ‘Editing Melville in Manuscript’, Leviathan 21.2 (June 2019), 107–32.
    Bryant, J., The Fluid Text: A Theory of Revision and Editing for Book and Screen (University of Michigan Press, 2002).
    Bryant, J., Melville Unfolding: Sexuality, Politics, and the Versions of Typee (University of Michigan Press, 2008).
    Bryant, J., Kelley, W., and Ohge, C. (eds.), Versions of Billy Budd, Sailor, Melville Electronic Library (2019), https://melville.electroniclibrary.org/versions-of-billy-budd.html.
    Burrows, J. F., Computation into Criticism (Oxford University Press, 1987).
    Burrows, J. F., ‘Textual Analysis’, in Schreibman, S., Siemens, R., and Unsworth, J. (eds.), A Companion to Digital Humanities (Blackwell, 2004), www.digitalhumanities.org/companion/.
    Bushell, S., Text as Process: Creative Composition in Wordsworth, Tennyson and Emily Dickinson (University of Virginia Press, 2009).
    Carroll, N., ‘Interpretation and Intention: The Debate between Hypothetical and Actual Intentionalism’, Metaphilosophy 31.1–2 (January 2000), 75–95.
    Clement, T., Hagenmaier, W., and Knies, J. L., ‘Toward a Notion of the Archive of the Future: Impressions of Practice by Librarians, Archivists, and Digital Humanities Scholars’, Library Quarterly 83.2 (April 2013), 112–30.
    Craig, E., Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis (Oxford University Press, 1990).
    Cramer, J. S. (ed.), The Portable Emerson (Penguin, 2014).
    Crane, G., Bamman, D., Cerrato, L., Jones, A., Mimno, D., Packel, A., Sculley, D., and Weaver, G., ‘Beyond Digital Incunabula: Modeling the Next Generation of Digital Libraries’, Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Digital Libraries (2006), Perseus Project, Tufts, 353–66, http://hdl.handle.net/10427/36131.
    Crossley-Holland, K. (trs.), The Exeter Book Riddles (Enitharmon Press, 2008).
    Crymble, A., ‘Digital Library Search Preferences amongst Historians and Genealogists: British History Online User Survey’, Digital Humanities Quarterly 10.4 (2016), www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/10/4/000270/000270.html.
    Crymble, A., Technology and the Historian: Transformations in the Digital Age (University of Illinois Press, 2021).
    Cummings, J., ‘Opening the Book: Data Models and Distractions in Digital Scholarly Editing’, International Journal of Digital Humanities (July 2019), 179–93, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42803-019-00016-6.
    Daniels, J., and Thistlethwaite, P., ‘Being a Scholar in the Digital Era’, in J. Daniels and P. Thistlethwaite, Transforming Scholarly Practice for the Public Good (Policy Press, 2016).
    Dasenbrock, R. W. (ed.), Literary Theory after Davidson (Pennsylvania State University Press, 1993).
    Davidson, D., Essential Davidson (Oxford University Press, 2006).
    Davidson, D., Truth, Language, and History (Oxford University Press, 2005).
    Davie, D., Essex Poems: 1963–1967 (Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969).
    Dekker, R., Bleeker, E., Buitendijk, B., Kulsdom, A., and Birnbaum, D., ‘TAGML: A Markup Language of Many Dimensions’, in Proceedings of Balisage: The Markup Conference 2018 21 (2018), DOI: https://doi.org/10.4242/BalisageVol21.HaentjensDekker01.
    Deppmann, J., Ferrer, D., and Groden, M. (eds.), Genetic Criticism: Texts and Avant-textes (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004).
    Dewey, J., Art as Experience (Penguin, 2005).
    Dewey, J., Human Nature and Conduct (Modern Library, 1922).
    Dewey, J., The Middle Works, 1899–1924, Volume 6: 1910–1911, ed. Boydston, J. A. (Southern Illinois University Press, 1978).
    Dewey, J., The Philosophy of John Dewey, ed. J. McDermott (University of Chicago Press, 1973).
    Drucker, J. ‘Humanities Approaches to Graphical Display’, Digital Humanities Quarterly 5.1 (2011), http://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/5/1/000091/000091.html.
    Earhart, A., Traces of the Old, Uses of the New (University of Michigan Press, 2015).
    Eco, U., ‘The Open Work (1989)’, trans. Cancogni, Anne, in Bardzell, Bardzell, and Blythe (eds.), Critical Theory and Interaction Design, pp. 145–66.
    Edel, L. (ed.) Henry James: The Selected Letters (Harvard University Press, 1987).
    Eggert, P., Securing the Past (Cambridge University Press, 2009).
    Empson, W., Seven Types of Ambiguity (New Directions, 1966).
    Eve, M., Close Reading with Computers: Textual Scholarship,Computational Formalism, and David Mitchell’s Cloud Atlas (Stanford University Press, 2019).
    Ezell, M. J. M., ‘Editing Early Modern Women’s Manuscripts: Theory, Electronic Editions, and the Accidental Copy-Text’, Literature Compass 7.2 (2010), 102–9.
    Fazi, M. B., Contingent Computation: Abstraction, Experience, and Indeterminacy in Computational Aesthetics (Rowman and Littlefield, 2018).
    Felski, R., The Limits of Critique (University of Chicago Press, 2015).
    Ferguson, M., Subject to Others: British Women Writers and Colonial Slavery, 1670–1834 (Routledge, 1992; 2014 reprint).
    Franzini, G., Terras, M., and Mahony, S., ‘Digital Editions of Text: Surveying User Requirements in the Digital Humanities’, Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage (February 2019), https://doi.org/10.1145/3230671.
    Gabler, H. W., Text Genetics and Literary Modernism (OpenBook Publishers, 2018), https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0120.
    Garcia, T. S., ‘Working Together: The Digital World and English Studies’, English Association Blog, 25 February 2019, www2.le.ac.uk/offices/english-association/news-1/working-together-the-digital-world-and-english-studies-by-tiago-sousa-garcia.
    Gaskell, P., A New Introduction to Bibliography (Oak Knoll Press, 1978).
    Gil, A., ‘How (and Why) to Generate a Static Website Using Jekyll, Part 1’, Chronicle of Higher Education, 31 August 2015, www.chronicle.com/blogs/profhacker/jekyll1/60913.
    Gitelman, L. (ed.), “Raw Data” Is an Oxymoron (MIT Press, 2013).
    Goldstone, A., ‘Teaching Quantitative Methods: What Makes It Hard (in Literary Studies)’, Debates in the Digital Humanities (2018), https://doi.org/doi:10.7282/T3G44SKG.
    Grafton, A., Inky Fingers: The Making of Books in Early Modern Europe (Harvard University Press, 2020).
    Greenberg, S., A Poetics of Editing (Palgrave Macmillan, 2018).
    Greetham, D. C. (ed.), Scholarly Editing: A Guide to Research (Modern Language Association of America, 1995).
    Greetham, D. C., ‘Textual Forensics’, PMLA 111.1 (January 1996), 32–51, https://doi.org/10.2307/463132.
    Greetham, D. C., Textual Scholarship: An Introduction (Garland, 1994).
    Greetham, D. C., Theories of the Text (Oxford University Press, 1999).
    Greg, W. W., ‘The Rationale of Copy-Text’, Studies in Bibliography 3 (1950–1), 19–36.
    Grice, H. P., Studies in the Way of Words (Harvard University Press, 1989).
    Grimstad, P., Experience and Experimental Writing: Literary Pragmatism from Emerson to the Jameses (Oxford University Press, 2013).
    Hancher, M., ‘Three Kinds of Intention’, Modern Language Notes 87 (December 1972), 827–51.
    Hannon, M., What’s the Point of Knowledge? (Oxford University Press, 2019).
    Hirst, R., ‘The Making of The Innocents Abroad: 1867–1872’ (PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley, 1975).
    Hooks, A. G., and Lesser, Z. (eds.), Shakespeare Census (created 2018). www.shakespearecensus.org.
    Housman, A. E., ‘The Application of Thought to Textual Criticism’, Proceedings of the Classical Association 18 (London, 1921), 67–84.
    Howard-Hill, T. H., ‘W. W. Greg as Bibliographer’, Textual Cultures 4.2 (Autumn 2009), 63–75.
    Huzzey, R., Freedom Burning: Anti-Slavery and Empire in Victorian Britain (Cornell University Press, 2012).
    Hyman, W., ‘The Inner Lives of Renaissance Machines’, in Curran, K. (ed.), Renaissance Personhood: Materiality, Taxonomy, Process (Edinburgh University Press, 2020), 44–61.
    James, W., and McDermott, J. J. (ed.), The Writings of William James: A Comprehensive Edition (University of Chicago Press, 1977).
    Jockers, M., Macroanalysis (University of Illinois Press, 2013).
    Jockers, M., Text Analysis with R for Students of Literature (Springer, 2014).
    Kestenbaum, V., The Grace and Severity of the Ideal: John Dewey and the Transcendent (University of Chicago Press, 2002).
    Lamarque, P., ‘Wittgenstein, Literature, and the Idea of a Practice’, British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (2010), 375–88.
    Lamarque, P., Work and Object (Oxford University Press, 2010).
    Lavagnino, J., ‘Access’, Literary and Linguistic Computing 24.1 (2009), 63–76, https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqn038.
    Maes, H., ‘Intention, Interpretation, and Contemporary Visual Art’, British Journal of Aesthetics 50.2 (April 2010), 121–38.
    Manns, J., ‘Intentionalism in John Dewey’s Aesthetics’, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 23.3 (Summer, 1987), 411–23.
    McCarthy, J., and Wright, P., Technology as Experience (MIT Press, 2004).
    McCarty, W., ‘Modelling the Actual, Simulating the Possible’, in J. Flanders and F. Jannidis (eds.), The Shape of Data in Digital Humanities: Modeling Texts and Text-Based Materials (Routledge, 2018).
    McDaniel, C., The Problem of Democracy in the Age of Slavery: Garrisonian Abolitionists and Transatlantic Reform (Louisiana State University Press, 2013).
    McGann, J., A Critique of Modern Textual Criticism (University of Virginia Press, 1992).
    McGann, J., A New Republic of Letters (Harvard University Press, 2014).
    McGann, J., Radiant Textuality: Literature after the World Wide Web (Palgrave, 2001).
    McKenzie, D. F., Bibliography and the Sociology of Texts (Cambridge University Press, 1999).
    Melville, H., Billy Budd, Sailor and Other Uncompleted Writings, eds., Hayford, H., MacDougall, A. A., R. A. Sandberg, and G. T. Tanselle, Volume 13 of The Writings of Herman Melville (Northwestern University Press and the Newberry Library, 2017).
    Melville, H., The Piazza Tales and Other Prose Pieces, 1839–1860, eds., Hayford, H., MacDougall, A. A., and Tanselle, G. T., Volume 9 of The Writings of Herman Melville (Northwestern University Press and The Newberry Library, 1987).
    Melville, H., Typee: A Peep at Polynesian Life, eds., Hayford, H., Parker, H., and Tanselle, G. T., Volume 1 of The Writings of Herman Melville (Northwestern University Press and the Newberry Library, 1968).
    Menand, L., Discovering Modernism: T. S. Eliot and His Context (Oxford University Press, 2007).
    Menand, L. (ed.), Pragmatism: A Reader (Vintage, 1997).
    Milton, J., ‘Areopagitica (1644)’, in Flannagan, R. (ed.), The Riverside Milton (Houghton Mifflin, 1998).
    Misak, C., Frank Ramsey: A Sheer Excess of Powers (Oxford University Press, 2020).
    Mole, T., What the Victorians Made of Romanticism (Princeton University Press, 2017).
    Nelson, T., ‘A Cosmology for a Different Computer Universe: Data Model, Mechanisms, Virtual Machine and Visualization Infrastructure’, Journal of Digital Information 5.1 (2006). https://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/131/129.
    Ohge, C., ‘Melville Incomplete’, American Literary History 31.1 (Spring 2019), 139–50.
    Ohge, C., ‘Melville’s Late Reading and the Revisions in the Billy Budd Manuscript’, in Yothers, B. (ed.), Critical Insights: Billy Budd (Salem Press, 2017), pp. 93–111.
    Ohge, C., and Olsen-Smith, S., ‘Digital Text Analysis at Melville’s Marginalia Online’, Leviathan: A Journal of Melville Studies 20.2 (2018), 1–16.
    Ohge, C., and Tupman, C., ‘Encoding and Analysis, and Encoding as Analysis, in Textual Editing’, in S. Dunn and K. Schuster (eds.), The Routledge International Handbook to Digital Humanities Research Methods, ch. 17 (Routledge, 2020).
    Ohge, C., Olsen-Smith, S., and Smith, E. B., with Brimhall, A., Howley, B., Shanks, L., and Smith, L., ‘“At the Axis of Reality”: Melville’s Marginalia in the Dramatic Works of William Shakespeare’, Leviathan: A Journal of Melville Studies 20.2 (2018), 37–67.
    Olsen-Smith, S., and Norberg, P. (eds.), Melville’s Marginalia Online. http://melvillesmarginalia.org/.
    Olsen-Smith, S., ‘The Inscription of Walt Whitman’s ‘Live Oak, with Moss’ Sequence: A Restorative Edition’, Scholarly Editing 33 (2012), http://scholarlyediting.org/2012/editions/intro.liveoakwithmoss.html
    Ozment, K., ‘A Rationale for Feminist Bibliography’, Textual Cultures 13.1 (2020), 149–78. DOI: 10.14434/textual.v13i1.30076.
    Pannapacker, W., ‘Digital Humanities Triumphant?’ in Gold, M. K. (ed.), Debates in Digital Humanities (University of Minnesota Press, 2012), https://doi.org/10.5749/9781452963754.
    Parker, H., Flawed Texts and Verbal Icons (Northwestern University Press, 1984).
    Parker, H., Reading Billy Budd (Northwestern University Press, 1990).
    Pierazzo, E., Digital Scholarly Editing: Theories, Models, and Methods (Ashgate, 2015).
    Piper, A., Enumerations: Data and Literary Study (University of Chicago Press, 2018).
    Plato, Parmenides, in H. N. Fowler (ed. and trs.), Plato in Twelve Volumes: With an English Translation, Cratylus, Parmenides, Greater Hippias, Lesser Hippias (W. Heinemann, 1926), accessed on the Perseus Digital Library, ed. G. R. Crane, www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3atext%3a1999.01.0174%3atext%3dParm.
    Poirier, R., Poetry and Pragmatism (Faber and Faber, 1992).
    Poirier, R., ‘Why Do Pragmatists Want to Be Like Poets?’, in Dickstein, M. (ed.), The Revival of Pragmatism (Duke University Press, 1999), pp. 347–61.
    Posner, M., and Klein, L. F., ‘Editor’s Introduction: Data as Media’, Feminist Media Histories 3.3 (2017), 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1525/fmh.2017.3.3.1.
    Price, L., The Anthology and the Rise of the Novel: From Richardson to George Eliot (Cambridge University Press, 2003).
    Putnam, H., ‘Philosophy and Our Mental Life’, in H. Putnam (ed.), Philosophical Papers, Volume 2: Mind, Language and Reality (Cambridge University Press, 1975), pp. 291–303.
    Putnam, H., Pragmatism: An Open Question (Blackwell, 1995).
    Putnam, H., Reason, Truth, and History (Cambridge University Press, 1981).
    Quine, W. V. O., From a Logical Point of View: Nine Logico-philosophical Essays, 2nd ed. (Harvard University Press, 1980).
    Quine, W. V. O., Philosophy of Logic (Prentice-Hall, 1970).
    Ramsey, S., ‘The Hermeneutics of Screwing Around’, in Kee, K. (ed.), Pastplay: Teaching and Learning History with Technology (University of Michigan Press, 2014), pp. 111–30.
    Rasmussen, K. S. G., ‘Reading or Using a Digital Edition? Reader Roles in Scholarly Editions’, in M. J. Driscoll and E. Pierazzo (eds.), Digital Scholarly Editing: Theories and Practices (OpenBook, 2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0095.07.
    Ricks, C., Essays in Appreciation (Oxford University Press, 1996).
    Ricks, C., ‘In Theory’, London Review of Books 3.7 (16 April 1981), 3–6.
    Ricks, C., ‘To Criticize the Critic’, Essays in Criticism 69.4 (October 2019), 476, https://doi.org/10.1093/escrit/cgz021.
    Rinard, S., ‘Pragmatic Skepticism’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (in press), www.susannarinard.com/s/Pragmatic-Skepticism-shhn.docx.
    Robinson, P., ‘Toward a Theory of Digital Editions’, Variants 10 (2013), 105–31, https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401209021_009.
    Rockwell, G., and Sinclair, S., Hermeneutica (MIT Press, 2016).
    Rorty, R., Consequences of Pragmatism (University of Minnesota Press, 1982).
    Rorty, R., Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity (Cambridge University Press, 1989).
    Ryle, G., ‘John Locke Re-edited’, Times Literary Supplement (19 September 1975), p. 1043.
    Sá Pereira, M. P., ‘Mixed Methodological Digital Humanities’, in Gold, M. K. and Klein, L. F. (eds.), Debates in Digital Humanities (University of Minnesota Press, 2019).
    Scheinfeld, T., ‘Sunset for Ideology, Sunrise for Methodology?’, in M. K. Gold (ed.), Debates in the Digital Humanities (University of Minnesota Press, 2012), https://doi.org/10.5749/9781452963754.
    Schloen, S., and Schloen, D., ‘Beyond Gutenberg: Transcending the Document Paradigm in Digital Humanities’, Digital Humanities Quarterly 8.4 (2014).
    Searle, J., Intentionality (Cambridge University Press, 1983).
    Searle, J. ‘Reiterating the Differences: A Reply to Derrida’, Glyph 1 (1977), 198–208.
    Shakespeare, W., Henry IV, Part I, The Arden Shakespeare, ed. Humphreys, A. R. (Methuen, 1965).
    Shakespeare, W., Richard III, The Arden Shakespeare, ed. Siemon, J., 3rd ed. (Bloomsbury, 2009).
    Shillingsburg, P., From Gutenberg to Google (Cambridge University Press, 2006).
    Silge, J., and Robinson, D., Text Mining with R: A Tidy Approach (2020), www.tidytextmining.com/.
    Smithies, J., The Digital Humanities and the Digital Modern (Palgrave Macmillan, 2017).
    So, R. J., ‘All Models Are Wrong’, PMLA 132.3 (2017), 668–73.
    Soames, S., ‘Analytic Philosophy of Language’, in K. Becker and I. Thomson (eds.), The Cambridge History of Philosophy, 1945–2015 (Cambridge University Press, 2019). doi:10.1017/9781316779651.
    Sperberg-McQueen, M., ‘Representing Concurrent Document Structures Using Trojan Horse Markup’, Proceedings of Balisage: The Markup Conference, Balisage Series on Markup Technologies, vol. 21 (2018), DOI: https://doi.org/10.4242/BalisageVol21.Sperberg-McQueen01.
    Stockwell, P., and Mahlberg, M., ‘Mind-Modelling with Corpus Stylistics in David Copperfield’, Language and Literature 24. 2 (May 2015), 129–47, doi:10.1177/0963947015576168.
    Tanselle, G. T., ‘The Editorial Problem of Final Authorial Intention’, Studies in Bibliography 29 (1976), 167–211.
    Tanselle, G. T., ‘Historicism and Critical Editing’, Studies in Bibliography 39 (1986), 1–46.
    Tanselle, G. T., ‘Print History and Other History’, Studies in Bibliography 48 (1995), 268–89.
    Tanselle, G. T., Rationale of Textual Criticism (University of Pennsylvania Press).
    Taylor, P., Condition: The Ageing of Art (Paul Holberton, 2015).
    Thompson, J. B., Books in the Digital Age: The Transformation of Academic and Higher Education Publishing in Britain and the United States (Polity Press, 2005).
    Thompson, J. B., Book Wars: The Digital Revolution in Publishing (Polity Press, 2021).
    Thorpe, J., Principles of Textual Criticism (Huntington Library, 1972).
    Underwood, T., Distant Horizons (University of Chicago Press, 2019).
    Van Hulle, D., Textual Awareness: A Genetic Study of Late Manuscripts by Joyce, Proust, and Mann (University of Michigan Press, 2004).
    Vinopal, J., and McCormick, M., ‘Supporting Digital Scholarship in Research Libraries: Scalability and Sustainability’, Journal of Library Administration 53.1 (2013), 27–42, https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2013.756689.
    Vinsel, L., and Russell, A., The Innovation Delusion: How Our Obsession with the New Has Disrupted the Work That Matters Most (Currency, 2020).
    Waldman, D. (ed.), Mark Rothko in New York (Guggenheim Museum, 1994).
    Weizenbaum, J., Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgement to Calculation (W. H. Freeman and Company, 1976).
    Wenke, J., ‘Melville’s Indirection: Billy Budd, the Genetic Text, and “the Deadly Space Between”’, in Yannella, D. (ed.), New Essays on Billy Budd (Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp. 114–44.
    Werner, M. (ed.), Writing In Time: Emily Dickinson’s Master Hours (Amherst College Press, 2021), p. 11, https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.12023683.
    Werstine, P., Early Modern Playhouse Manuscripts and the Editing of Shakespeare (Cambridge University Press, 2012).
    Whitman, W., Leaves of Grass (New York, 1891), accessed at the Walt Whitman Archive, eds., M. Cohen, E. Folsom, and K. Price, https://whitmanarchive.org/published/LG/1891/poems/193.
    Williams, S., Data Action: Using Data for Public Good (MIT Press, 2020).
    Williams, W. P., and Abbott, C. S., An Introduction to Bibliographical and Textual Studies, 4th ed. (Modern Language Association of America, 2009).
    Wimsatt, W. K., and Beardsley, M. C., ‘The Intentional Fallacy’, Sewanee Review 54.3 (1946), 468–88.
    Wittgenstein, L., Philosophical Investigations, trans. Anscombe, G. E. M., 2nd ed. (Blackwell, 1997).
    Wittgenstein, L., Remarks on Colour (Blackwell, 1977).
    Wood, M., ‘Radical Publishing’, in M. F. Suarez, S.J. and M. L. Turner (eds.), The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, Volume 5: 1695–1830 (Cambridge University Press, 2009).
    Woudhuysen, H. R. (ed.), Samuel Johnson on Shakespeare (Penguin, 1989).

    Metrics

    Altmetric attention score

    Full text views

    Total number of HTML views: 0
    Total number of PDF views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    Book summary page views

    Total views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    * Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

    Usage data cannot currently be displayed.

    Accessibility standard: Unknown

    Why this information is here

    This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

    Accessibility Information

    Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.