Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Relationality
  • Cited by 13
      • Show more authors
      • Open Access
      You have digital access to this book
    • Select format
    • Publisher:
      Cambridge University Press
      Publication date:
      23 November 2022
      22 December 2022
      ISBN:
      9781009118996
      9781009113199
      DOI:
      https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009118996
      Creative Commons:
      Creative Common License - CC Creative Common License - BY Creative Common License - NC Creative Common License - ND
      This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0.
      https://creativecommons.org/creativelicenses
      Dimensions:
      Weight & Pages:
      Dimensions:
      (229 x 152 mm)
      Weight & Pages:
      0.15kg, 72 Pages
      • Subjects:
      Political Economy, Politics and International Relations, Comparative Politics
      Series:
      Elements in Public Policy
    Open Access
    You have digital access to this book
    Selected: Digital
    View content
    Add to cart View cart Buy from Cambridge.org
    Subjects:
    Political Economy, Politics and International Relations, Comparative Politics
    Series:
    Elements in Public Policy
    Information

    Book description

    This Element argues that relational policy analysis can provide deeper insights into the career of any policy and the dynamics of any policy situation. This task is all the more difficult as the relational often operates unseen in the backstages of a policy arena. Another issue is the potentially unbounded scope of a relational analysis. But these challenges should not dissuade policy scholars from beginning to address the theme of relationality in public policy. This Element sketches a conceptual framework for the study of relationality and illustrates some of the promise of relational analysis using an extended case study. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.

    References

    References

    Akram, S. (2018). Representative bureaucracy and unconscious bias: Exploring the unconscious dimension of active representation. Public Administration, 96(1), 119–133.
    Alta, A., & Mukhtarov, F. (2022). Relationality as a lens for policy analysis: Preserving harmony in a triangular cooperation project to strengthen gender mainstreaming in Fiji. Administration & Society, 54(7): 1283–1304. http://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211073527.
    Araral, E., Pak, A., Pelizzo, R., & Wu, X. (2019). Neo‐patrimonialism and corruption: Evidence from 8,436 firms in 17 countries in Sub‐Saharan Africa. Public Administration Review, 79(4), 580–590.
    Arnold, G., Nguyen Long, L. A., & Gottlieb, M. (2017). Social networks and policy entrepreneurship: How relationships shape municipal decision making about high‐volume hydraulic fracturing. Policy Studies Journal, 45(3), 414–441.
    Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(2), 241–253.
    Arts, B., & Tatenhove, J. V. (2004). Policy and power: A conceptual framework between the “old” and “new” policy idioms. Policy Sciences, 37(3), 339–356.
    Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1995). Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. Oxford University Press, New York.
    Balachandran, M. (2021, January 8). Unsung heroes: ASHA workers, the foot soldiers of battle against Covid-19. Forbes India. www.forbesindia.com/article/the-unsung-heroes-of-covid19/unsung-heroes-asha-workers-the-foot-soldiers-of-battle-against-covid19/65579/1.
    Barbehön, M. (2022).Policy design and constructivism. In Peters, B. G. and Fontaine, Guillaume (eds.), Research Handbook of Policy Design. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 104–119.
    Bartels, K., & Turnbull, N. (2019). Relational public administration: A synthesis and heuristic classification of relational approaches. Public Management Review, 22(9), 1–23.
    Barthes, R. (1974). S/Z (R. Miller, trans.). Noonday, New York.
    Bertelli, A. M., Hassan, M., Honig, D., Rogger, D., & Williams, M. J. (2020). An agenda for the study of public administration in developing countries. Governance, 33(4), 735–748.
    Bertelli, A. M., & Smith, C. R. (2009). Relational contracting and network management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(suppl_1), i21–i40.
    Bertelli, A. M., & Smith, C. R. (2010). Relational contracting and network management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(suppl_1), i21–i40.
    Bevir, M., & Rhodes, R. A. (2010). The State as Cultural Practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
    Bevir, M., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (2022). All you need is … a network: The rise of interpretive public administration. Public Administration, 100, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12817.
    Bodin, Ö., & Crona, B. I. (2009). The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 366–374.
    Bohnet, I., & Frey, B. S. (1999). Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games: Comment. American Economic Review, 89(1), 335–339.
    Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review, 90(1), 166–193.
    Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice (R. Nice, trans.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Routledge, London.
    Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In Richardson, J. (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Greenwood, New York, 241–258.
    Braithwaite, J. (2013). Relational republican regulation. Regulation & Governance, 7, 124–144.
    Brentano, F. (1874). Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
    Brewer, M. B., and Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this “We”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 83.
    Bronfenbrenner, U. (1992). Ecological Systems Theory. Jessica Kingsley, London.
    Brugnach, M., & Ingram, H. (2012). Ambiguity: The challenge of knowing and deciding together. Environmental Science & Policy, 15(1), 60–71.
    Bruner, J. (2003). Self-making narratives. In Fivush, Robyn, Haden, Catherine A. (eds.), Autobiographical Memory and the Construction of a Narrative Self. Psychology Press, East Sussex, 225–242.
    Camerer, C. F., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). Anomalies: Ultimatums, dictators and manners. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), 209–219.
    Capello, R., & Faggian, A. (2005). Collective learning and relational capital in local innovation processes. Regional Studies, 39(1), 75–87.
    Carey, G., Braunack-Mayer, A., & Barraket, J. (2009). Spaces of care in the third sector: Understanding the effects of professionalization. Health, 13(6), 629–646.
    Carstensen, M. B. (2015). Bringing ideational power into the paradigm approach: Critical perspectives on policy paradigms in theory and practice. In Hogan, John and Howlett, Michael (eds.), Policy Paradigms in Theory and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, London, 295–318.
    Carter, D. P., Weible, C. M., Siddiki, S. N., Brett, J., & Chonaiew, S. M. (2015). Assessing policy divergence: How to investigate the differences between a law and a corresponding regulation. Public Administration, 93(1), 159–176.
    Case Management Society of Australia and New Zealand. (2015). What is a case manager?. www.cmsa.org.au/about-us/what-is-a-case-manager.
    Chang, A. (2021). A formal model of street-level bureaucracy. Rationality and Society, 34(1), 6–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/10434631211043205.
    Christiansen, T., Follesdal, A., & Piattoni, S. (2004). Informal governance in the European Union: An introduction. In Christiansen, T. & Piattoni, S. (eds.), Informal Governance in the European Union. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 1–21.
    Chui, E. (2011). Consultancy Study on Community Care Services – Final Report. Elderly Commission, Hong Kong SAR.
    Chui, E., & Law, C. K. (2016). Elderly Services Programme Plan: Report on Formulation Stage. Department of Social Work & Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
    Cialdini, R. B., Brown, S. L., Lewis, B. P., Luce, C., & Neuberg, S. L. (1997). Reinterpreting the empathy–altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 481–494.
    Clarke, J., Smith, N., & Vidler, E. (2006). The indeterminacy of choice: Political, policy and organisational implications. Social Policy and Society, 5(3), 327–336.
    Colebatch, H. K. (2006). What work makes policy? Policy Sciences, 39(4), 309–321.
    Cooke, G., & Muir, R. (eds.). (2012). The Relational State: How Recognising the Importance of Human Relationships could Revolutionise the Role of the State. Institute for Public Policy Research, London.
    Craft, J. (2015). Conceptualizing the policy work of partisan advisers. Policy Sciences, 48(2), 135–158.
    Crona, B., & Bodin, Ö. (2006). What you know is who you know? Communication patterns among resource users as a prerequisite for co-management. Ecology and Society, 11(2):1–23.
    Crossley, N. (2011). Towards Relational Sociology. Routledge, Abingdon.
    Debenedetti, L. (2021). Togo’s Novissi Cash Transfer: Designing and Implementing a Fully Digital Social Assistance Program during COVID-19. IPA (Innovations for Poverty Action). www.poverty-action.org/sites/default/files/publications/Togo-Novissi-Cash-Transfer-Brief-August%202021.pdf.
    Dobson, R. (2015). Power, agency, relationality, and welfare practice. Journal of Social Policy, 44(4), 687–705.
    Donati, P. (2011). Relational Sociology: A New Paradigm for the Social Sciences. Routledge, Abingdon.
    Dryzek, J. S., & Ripley, B. (1988). The ambitions of policy design. Review of Policy Research, 7(4), 705–719.
    Dunlop, C. A. (2015). Organizational political capacity as learning. Policy and Society, 34(3–4), 259–270.
    Durose, C., & Richardson, L. (2015). Designing Public Policy for Co-production: Theory, Practice and Change. Policy Press, Bristol.
    Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interoganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.
    Ellis, K. (2011). Street-level bureaucracy revisited: The changing face of frontline discretion in adult social care in England. Social Policy and Administration, 45(3), 221–244.
    Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317.
    Evans, M., & Terrey, N. (2016). Co-design with citizens and stakeholders. In Stoker, Gerry and Evans, Mark (eds.), Evidence-Based Policy Making in the Social Sciences: Methods That Matter. Policy Press, Bristol, UK, 243–262.
    Ferguson, N. (2017). The Square and the Tower: Networks, Hierarchies and the Struggle for Global Power. Allen Lane, London, UK.
    Fernandez, de Castro, F., & Lejano, R. (2018). Program implementation and the invisible hand of community: The experience of the conditional cash transfer program in Northern Mexico. In Mica, A., Wyrzykowska, K., Zielińska, I., & Wiśniewski, R. (eds.), The Sociology of the Invisible Hand. Peter Lang, Berlin, 299–328.
    Fotoukian, Z., Shahboulaghi, F. M., Khoshknab, M. F., & Mohammadi, E. (2014). Barriers to and factors facilitating empowerment in elderly with COPD. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 28, 155–166.
    Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and Punish (A. Sheridan, trans.). Gallimard, Paris.
    Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and Freedom. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
    Frisch-Aviram, N., Cohen, N., & Beeri, I. (2018). Low-level bureaucrats, local government regimes and policy entrepreneurship. Policy Sciences, 51(1), 39–57.
    Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. Basic Books, New York.
    Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
    Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Penguin Random House, New York.
    González, B. J., & Loza, M. (2016). Opening the archives: Legacies of the Bracero program. Diálogo, 19(2), 3–6.
    The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKGSAR). (2021, December 2). Ombudsman examines pilot scheme on community care service voucher for the elderly [Press release]. www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/202112/02/P2021120200295.htm.
    Grindle, M. S. (2017). Policy content and context in implementation. In Grindle, Merilee S. (ed.), Politics and Policy Implementation in the Third World. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 3–34.
    Gunningham, N., Grabosky, P. N., & Sinclair, D. (1998). Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy. Oxford Socio-Legal Studies, Oxford.
    Habermas, J. (1985). The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society (Vol. 1). Beacon Press, Boston, Massachusetts.
    Hajer, M. (1993). Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice: The case of acid rain in Britain. In Fischer, F. & Forester, J. (eds.), The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Duke University Press, Durham, 43–76.
    Hand, L. C. (2021). A virtuous hearer: An exploration of epistemic injustice and an ethic of care in public encounters. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 43(1), 117–133.
    Haque, U., Hashizume, M., Kolivras, K. N. et al. (2012). Reduced death rates from cyclones in Bangladesh: What more needs to be done? Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 90, 150–156.
    Harris, L. M. (2021). Towards enriched narrative political ecologies. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 5(2) 835–860. https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486211010677.
    Healey, P. (2006). Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for Our Times. Routledge, New York.
    Heide, J. B., & John, G. (1992). Do norms matter in marketing relationships? Journal of Marketing, 56(2), 32–44.
    Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2021). Implementing Public Policy: An Introduction to the Study of Operational Governance. Sage, Thousand Oaks.
    Hoffman, J. (2013). Theorizing power in transition studies: The role of creativity and novel practices in structural change. Policy Sciences, 46(3), 257–275.
    Hornung, J., Bandelow, N. C., & Vogeler, C. S. (2019). Social identities in the policy process. Policy Sciences, 52(2), 211–231.
    Howlett, M., & Mukherjee, I. (2014). Policy design and non-design: Towards a spectrum of policy formulation types. Politics and Governance, 2(2), 57–71.
    Huff, A., & Cooke, A. (2022). Mixed signals: Understanding the democratic work of narratives in pro-immigrant protests across local policy environments. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 0(0) 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544221093154.
    Huising, R., & Silbey, S. S. (2011). Governing the gap: Forging safe science through relational regulation. Regulation & Governance, 5(1), 14–42.
    Husserl, E. (1900/1901). Logical Investigations (Moran, D., ed., 2nd ed., 2 Vols.). Routledge, London.
    Ingram, H., Lejano, R., & Ingram, M. (2014). From discourse coalitions to narrative-networks: Uncovering networks in the deliberative process. In American Political Science Association (APSA) 2014 Annual Meeting. Washington, DC.
    Ingram, H., Schneider, A. L., & DeLeon, P. (2019). Social construction and policy design. In Sabatier, Paul (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process. Routledge, New York, 93–126.
    International Centre for Climate Change and Development (ICCCAD). (2022, February 10). 50 years of cyclone preparedness: Success in saving lives, but not livelihood. www.icccad.net/the-business-standard/50-years-of-cyclone-preparedness-success-in-saving-lives-but-not-livelihood-over-the-past-30-years-the-number-of-cyclone-shelters-have-increased-from-400-to-14000-but-it-is-still-insufficient-for/.
    Jamieson, K. H., & Cappella, J. N. (2008). Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment. Oxford University Press, New York.
    Johnston, K. A., & Lane, A. B. (2018). Building relational capital: The contribution of episodic and relational community engagement. Public Relations Review, 44(5), 633–644.
    Kan, W. S. (2018). Consumer-directed care: Empowerment model of community care service voucher utilisation in Hong Kong. Unpublished HKU Theses Online, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
    Kan, W. S. (2022). Barriers to an effective voucher programme for community-based aged care: A professional perspective. Ageing and Society, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X22000502.
    Kan, W. S., & Chui, E. (2021). Vouchers and consumer-directed care: Implications for community care services in Hong Kong. The British Journal of Social Work, 51(1), 96–113.
    Kenis, P., & Schneider, V. (2019). Analyzing policy-making II: Policy network analysis. In Hilde Van den Bulck, Manuel Puppis, Karen Donders, and Leo Van Audenhove (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Methods for Media Policy Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 471–491.
    Klijn, E. H. (1997). Policy networks: An overview. In Kickert, W. J., Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. (eds.), Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector. Sage, Thousand Oaks, 14–34
    Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler (KPMG). (2012). Evaluation of the Consumer-Directed Care Initiative, Final Report. Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra.
    Lai, A. H. Y., Kuang, Z., Yam, C. H. K., Ayub, S., & Yeoh, E. K. (2018). Vouchers for primary healthcare services in an ageing world? The perspectives of elderly voucher recipients in Hong Kong. Health & Social Care in the Community, 26(3), 374–382.
    Lasswell, H. D. (1958). Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. Meridian Books, New York.
    Lasswell, H. D. (1970). The emerging conception of the policy sciences. Policy Sciences, 1(1), 3–14.
    Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern (P. Catherine, trans.). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
    Legislative Council Secretariat. (2012). Legislative Council Panel on Welfare Services Pilot Scheme on Community Care Service Voucher for the Elderly for Discussion on 13 February 2012. HKSAR Government, Hong Kong.
    Lejano, R. P. (2006). Frameworks for Policy Analysis: Merging Text and Context. Routledge, New York.
    Lejano, R. P. (2008). The phenomenon of collective action: Modeling institutions as structures of care. Public Administration Review, 68(3), 491–504.
    Lejano, R. P. (2021). Relationality: An alternative framework for analysing policy. Journal of Public Policy, 41(2), 360–383.
    Lejano, R. P. (2022). Empathy and the Commons: A Relational Theory of Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, New York (in press).
    Lejano, R. P., Ingram, M., & Ingram, H. (2013). The Power of Narrative in Environmental Networks. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
    Lejano, R. P., & Shankar, S. (2013). The contextualist turn and schematics of institutional fit: Theory and a case study from Southern India. Policy Sciences, 46(1), 83–102.
    Leung, H. (2020, March 12). Why wearing a face mask is encouraged in Asia, but shunned in the U.S. Time. https://time.com/5799964/coronavirus-face-mask-asia-us/.
    Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
    Longhofer, J., Kubek, P. M., & Floersch, J. (2010). On Being and Having a Case Manager: A Relational Approach to Recovery in Mental Health. Columbia University Press, New York.
    Lou, V. W. Q. (2014). Case management in community-based long-term care: Good practices and challenges in Hong Kong. In Tong, K. W. & Fung, K. N. K. (eds.), Community Care in Hong Kong: Current Practices, Practice-Research Studies and Future Directions. City University of Hong Kong Press, Hong Kong, 17–36.
    Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, trans., Vol. 10). University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
    March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. The Free Press, New York.
    March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1998). The institutional dynamics of international political orders. International Organization, 52(4), 943–969.
    March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2010). Rediscovering Institutions. Simon and Schuster, New York.
    Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (eds.). (1981). Effective Policy Implementation. The Free Press, New York.
    McKelvey, T. (2020, July 20). Coronavirus: Why are Americans so angry about masks? BBC. www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53477121.
    Millar, H., Lesch, M., & White, L. A. (2019). Connecting models of the individual and policy change processes: A research agenda. Policy Sciences, 52(1), 97–118.
    Muir, R., & Parker, I. (2014). Many to Many: How the Relational State Will Transform Public Services. Institute for Public Policy Research, London.
    Mulgan, G. (2012). Government with the people: The outlines of a relational state. In Cooke, G. & Muir, R. (eds.), The Relational State: How Recognising the Importance of Human Relationship Could Revolutionise the Role of the State. Institute for Public Policy Research, London, 20–34.
    Nisar, M. A., & Maroulis, S. (2017). Foundations of relating: Theory and evidence on the formation of street‐level bureaucrats’ workplace networks. Public Administration Review, 77(6), 829–839.
    O’Toole, L. J. Jr. (2000). Research on policy implementation: Assessment and prospects. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 263–288.
    O’Toole, L. J., Hanf, K. I., & Hupe, P. L. (1997). Managing implementation processes in networks. In Kickert, W. J. M, Klijn, E. H, and Koppenjan, J. F. M (eds.), Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector. Sage, Thousand Oaks, 137–151.
    Peake, G., & Forsyth, M. (2022). Street‐level bureaucrats in a relational state: The case of Bougainville. Public Administration and Development, 42(1), 12–21.
    Pertierra, A. C. (2017). Celebrity politics and televisual melodrama in the age of Duterte. In Curato, Nicole (ed.), A Duterte Reader: Critical Essays on Rodrigo Duterte’s Early Presidency, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 219–229.
    Peters, B. G., Capano, G., Howlett, M. et al. (2018). Designing for Policy Effectiveness: Defining and Understanding a Concept. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
    Piaget, J. (1952). The Origins of Intelligence in Children. International University Press, New York.
    Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 707–725.
    Powell, C., & Dépelteau, F. (eds.). (2013). Conceptualizing Relational Sociology: Ontological and Theoretical Issues. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
    Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1984). Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland; Or, Why It’s Amazing that Federal Programs Work at All, This Being a Saga of the Economic Development Administration as Told by Two Sympathetic Observers Who Seek to Build Morals on a Foundation. University of California Press, Berkeley.
    Prgomet, M., Douglas, H. E., Tariq, A. et al. (2017). The work of frontline community aged care staff and the impact of a changing policy landscape and consumer-directed care. British Journal of Social Work, 47(1), 106–124.
    Ramesh, M., Wu, X., & He, A. J. (2014). Health governance and healthcare reforms in China. Health Policy and Planning, 29(6), 663–672.
    Ramírez, V. (2021). Relationships in the implementation of conditional cash transfers: The provision of health in the Oportunidades-Prospera programme in Puebla, Mexico. Social Policy and Society, 20(3), 400–417.
    Rein, M., & Schön, D. (1991). Frame-reflective policy discourse. In Wagner, Peter, Weiss, Carol Hirschon, and Wittrock, Björn (eds.), Social Sciences and Modern States: National Experiences and Theoretical Crossroads. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 262–289. https://doi:10.1017/CBO9780511983993.012.
    Ricoeur, P. (1988). Time and Narrative (Vol. 3). University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
    Ricoeur, P. (1991). Life in quest of narrative. In Wood, D. (ed.), On Paul Ricoeur. Routledge, London, 20–33.
    Rivera, A. E., Rivera, G., & Carrillo, F. J. (2021). Urban relational capital and new transaction regimes. In Carillo, Francisco Javier and Garner, Cathy (ed.), City Preparedness for the Climate Crisis. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 281–291.
    Rogers, S. H., & Jarema, P. M. (2015). A brief history of social capital research. In Halstead, J. & Deller, S. (eds.), Social Capital at the Community Level. Routledge, New York, 14–30.
    Rothman, J. (1991). A model of case management: Toward empirically based practice. Social Work, 36(6), 520–528.
    Ruggiano, N. (2012). Consumer direction in long-term care policy: Overcoming barriers to promoting older adults’ opportunity for self-direction. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 55(2), 146–159.
    Sabatier, P. A. (1986). Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: A critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy, 6(1), 21–48.
    Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21(2), 129–168.
    Sau Po Centre on Ageing. (2015). Evaluation Study of the First Phase of the Pilot Scheme on Community Care Service Voucher (CSSV) for the Elderly: Mid-term Evaluation Report. The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
    Stewart, J., & Ayres, R. (2001). Systems theory and policy practice: An exploration. Policy Sciences, 34(1), 79–94.
    Stout, M., & Love, J. M. (2015). Relational process ontology: A grounding for global governance. Administration & Society, 47(4), 447–481.
    Stout, M., & Love, J. M. (2017). Integrative governance: A method for fruitful public encounters. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(1), 130–147.
    Stout, M., & Love, J. M. (2018). Integrative Governance: Generating Sustainable Responses to Global Crises. Routledge, New York.
    Trudeau, D. (2008). Towards a relational view of the shadow state. Political Geography, 27(6), 669–690.
    Turnbull, N. (2006). How should we theorise public policy? Problem solving and problematicity. Policy and Society, 25(2), 3–22.
    Unwin, J. (2018). Kindness, Emotions and Human Relationships. Carnegie UK Trust, Dunfermline.
    Van Parys, L., & Struyven, L. (2018). Interaction styles of street-level workers and motivation of clients: A new instrument to assess discretion-as-used in the case of activation of jobseekers. Public Management Review, 20(11), 1702–1721.
    Warne Peters, R., & Mulligan, J. M. (2019). Introduction to a symposium on development implementation: Discipline, deception, and the relational work of development. Critical Policy Studies, 13(4), 370–378.
    Warsen, R., Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. (2019). Mix and match: How contractual and relational conditions are combined in successful public–private partnerships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(3), 375–393.
    Wedel, J. R. (2009). Shadow Elite: How the World’s New Power Brokers Undermine Democracy, Government, and the Free Market. Basic Books, New York.
    Weimer, D. L., & Vining, A. R. (2017). Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice. Routledge, New York.
    Wildavsky, A. (1964). The road to PPB: The stages of budget reform. Public Administration Review, 29, 189–202.
    Wilder, M., & Howlett, M. (2015). Paradigm construction and the politics of policy anomalies. In Hogan, J. & Howlett, M. (eds.), Policy Paradigms in Theory and Practice: Discourses, Ideas and Anomalies in Public Policy Dynamics. Springer, New York, 101–116.
    Wilkins, V. M., & Williams, B. N. (2009). Representing blue: Representative bureaucracy and racial profiling in the Latino community. Administration & Society, 40(8), 775–798.
    Wilshusen, P. R. (2009). Social process as everyday practice: The micro politics of community-based conservation and development in southeastern Mexico. Policy Sciences, 42(2), 137–162.
    Winter, S. C. (2001, November). Reconsidering street-level bureaucracy theory: From identifying to explaining coping behavior. In Annual Research Conference of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management. Washington, DC, 1–3.
    Wolch, J. R. (1990). The Shadow State: Government and Voluntary Sector in Transition. Foundation Center, New York.
    Wu, X., Ramesh, M., & Howlett, M. (2015). Policy capacity: A conceptual framework for understanding policy competences and capabilities. Policy and Society, 34(3–4), 165–171.
    Xin, K. K., & Pearce, J. L. (1996). Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1641–1658.
    Yu, S. W. K., Lo, I. P. Y., & Chau, R. C. M. (2021). Rethinking the residual policy response: Lessons from Hong Kong older women’s responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. International Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208728211036179. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epub/10.1177/00208728211036179

    Metrics

    Altmetric attention score

    Full text views

    Total number of HTML views: 0
    Total number of PDF views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    Book summary page views

    Total views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    * Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

    Usage data cannot currently be displayed.

    Accessibility standard: Unknown

    Why this information is here

    This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

    Accessibility Information

    Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.