References
Alston, W. P., “Epistemic Desiderata,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (1993): 527–51.
Andersen, H., Barker, P. and Chen, X., The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).
Argamakova, A., “Modeling Scientific Development: Lessons from Thomas Kuhn,” in Mizrahi (ed.), Kuhnian Image, pp. 45–60.
Baghramian, M. and Coliva, A., Relativism (London: Routledge, 2019).
Barnes, B., “Acceptance: Science Studies and the Empirical Understanding of Science,” Science, Technology & Human Values 24 (1999): 376–83.
Barnes, B., “Natural Rationality: A Neglected Concept in the Social Sciences,” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 6 (1976): 115–26.
Barnes, B., “On the Conventional Character of Knowledge and Cognition,” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11 (1981): 303–33.
Barnes, B., “Realism, Relativism and Finitism,” in Raven, D., van Vucht Tijssen, L. and de Wolf, J. (eds.), Cognitive Relativism and Social Science (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1992), pp. 131–47.
Barnes, B., T.S. Kuhn and Social Science (London: Macmillan, 1982).
Barnes, B. and Bloor, D., “Relativism, Rationalism and the Sociology of Knowledge,” in Hollis, M. and Lukes, S. (eds.), Rationality and Relativism (Oxford: Blackwell, 1982), pp. 21–47.
Beall, J. C. and Restall, G., Logical Pluralism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).
Biagioli, M., Galileo, Courtier: The Practice of Science in the Culture of Absolutism (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1993).
Biagioli, M., “The Anthropology of Incommensurability,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 21 (1990): 183–209.
Bird, A., “Incommensurability Naturalized,” in Soler, Sankey and Hoyningen-Huene (eds.), Rethinking Scientific Change, pp. 21–39.
Bird, A., “Kuhn, Naturalism, and the Social Study of Science,” in Kindi and Arabatzis (eds.), Kuhn’s Structure, pp. 205–30.
Bird, A., Thomas Kuhn, (Princeton, MA: Princeton University Press, 2000).
Blackwell, R. J., Galileo, Bellarmine, and the Bible (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, Kindle edition, 1991).
Bloor, D., “Anti-Latour,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30 (1999): 81–112.
Bloor, D., “Durkheim and Mauss Revisited: Classification and the Sociology of Knowledge,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 13 (1982): 267–97.
Bloor, D., “Epistemic Grace,” Common Knowledge 12 (2007): 250–80.
Bloor, D., “Epistemology or Psychology,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 5 (1975): 382–95.
Bloor, D., Knowledge and Social Imagery, 2nd edn (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1991).
Bloor, D., “Relativism and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge,” in Hales (ed.), Companion, pp. 433–55.
Bloor, D., The Enigma of the Aerofoil: Rival Theories in Aerodynamics, 1909–1930 (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2011).
Bloor, D., Wittgenstein: A Social Theory of Knowledge (New York: Columbia University Press, 1983).
Bloor, D., Wittgenstein, Rules and Institutions (London: Routledge, 1997).
Boghossian, P., “Der Relativismus des Normativen,” in Gabriel, M. (ed.), Der Neue Realismus (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2014), pp. 362–95.
Boghossian, P., Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006).
Boghossian, P., “How Are Objective Epistemic Reasons Possible?” Philosophical Studies 106 (2001): 1–40.
Boghossian, P., “Three Kinds of Relativism,” in Hales (ed.), Companion, pp. 53–69.
Carnap, R., The Continuum of Inductive Methods (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1952).
Carnap, R., The Logical Syntax of Language (London, Kegan Paul, 1937).
Carter, J. A., Metaepistemology and Relativism (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016).
Chakravartty, A., Scientific Ontology: Integrating Naturalized Metaphysics and Voluntarist Epistemology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).
Chakravartty, A., “Stance Relativism: Empiricism versus Metaphysics,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 34 (2004): 173–84.
Chang, H., Is Water H2O? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism, (Berlin: Springer, 2012).
Chang, H., “Relativism,” in Kusch (ed.), Relativism, pp. 379–87.
Code, L., Rhetorical Spaces: Essays on Gendered Location (London: Routledge, 1995).
Collins, H. M., Gravity’s Shadow: The Search for Gravitational Waves (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2004).
Collins, H. M., Evans, R. and Weinel, M., “STS as Science or Politics?” Social Studies of Science 47 (2007): 580–6.
Collins, H. M. and Yearley, S., “Epistemological Chicken,” in Pickering (ed.), Science, pp. 343–68.
Craig, E., Knowledge and the State of Nature (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999).
Creager, A. N. H., “Paradigms and Exemplars Meet Biomedicine,” in Richards and Daston (eds.), Kuhn’s Structure, pp. 151–66.
Crețu, A.-M. and Massimi, M. (eds.), Knowledge from a Human Point of View (New York: Springer, 2019).
Daston, L., “History of Science without Structure,” in Richards and Daston (eds.), Kuhn’s Structure, 115–32.
Dupre, J., The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995).
Durkheim, E., The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, transl. by K. E. Fields (New York: The Free Press, 1995).
Feyerabend, P., Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge (London: NLB, 1975).
Feyerabend, P., “Classical Empiricism,” in Feyerabend, P., Problems of Empiricism: Philosophical Papers, 2 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), vol. II, pp. 34–51.
Feyerabend, P., Conquest of Abundance: A Tale of Abstraction versus the Richness of Being (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, 1999).
Field, H., “Epistemology without Metaphysics,” Philosophical Studies 143 (2009): 249–90.
Finocchiaro, M. A. (2005), Retrying Galileo, 1633–1992 (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
Frank, P., Wahrheit, relativ oder absolut? (Zurich: Pan-Verlag, 1952).
Friedman, M., Dynamics of Reason (Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, Kindle edn, 2001).
Friedman, M., “Extending the Dynamics of Reason,” Erkenntnis 75 (2011): 431–44.
Friedman, M., “On the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge and Its Philosophical Agenda,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 29 (1998): 239–71.
Fuller, S., Knowledge: The Philosophical Quest in History (London: Routledge, 2015).
Fuller, S., Post-Truth: Knowledge as a Power Game (London: Anthem, Kindle edn, 2018).
Galison, P., “Practice All the Way Down,” in Richards and Daston (eds.), Kuhn’s Structure, pp. 42–70.
Garber, D., “Why the Scientific Revolution Wasn’t a Scientific Revolution,” in Richards and Daston (eds.), Kuhn’s Structure, pp. 133–49.
Giere, R., Scientific Perspectivism (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, Kindle edn, 2006).
Greene, J. C., “The Kuhnian Paradigm and the Darwinian Revolution in Natural History,” in Roller, D. H. D (ed.), Perspectives in the History of Science and Technology (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1971), pp. 3–25.
Haack, S., Manifesto of a Passionate Moderate: Unfashionable Essays (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1998).
Hacking, I., “Introductory Essay,” in Kuhn, Structure, Kindle loc. 59–522.
Hales, S., “Motivations for Relativism as a Solution to Disagreements,” Philosophy 89 (2014): 63–82.
Hales, S. (ed.), The Oxford Companion to Relativism (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011).
Hazlett, A., “Entitlement and Mutually Recognized Reasonable Disagreement,” Episteme 11 (2014): 1–25.
Heidegger, M., Poetry, Language, Thought, transl. by A. Hofstadter (New York: Harper & Row, 1971).
Heilbron, J. L., Galileo (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).
Herbert, C., Victorian Relativity: Radical Thought and Scientific Discovery (Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, 2001).
Herrnstein Smith, B., Practicing Relativism in the Anthropocene: On Science, Belief and the Humanities (London: Open Humanities Press, 2018).
Hesse, M., The Structure of Scientific Inference (London: Macmillan, 1974).
Hoyningen-Huene, P., Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions: Thomas S. Kuhn’s Philosophy of Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993).
Hoyningen-Huene, P., “Thomas Kuhn and the Chemical Revolution,” Foundations of Chemistry 10 (2008): 101–15.
Husserl, E., Logical Investigations (1900), transl. by J. N. Findlay (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1970).
James, W., The Will to Believe and Human Immortality (New York: Dover Publications, 1956).
Johnson, P. E., Darwin on Trial (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, 1991).
Kellert, S. H., Longino, H. and Waters, C. K. (eds.), Scientific Pluralism (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2006).
Kindi, V. and Arabatzis, T. (eds.), Kuhn’s “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions” Revisited (New York: Routledge, 2012).
Köhnke, K. C., The Rise of Neo-Kantianism: German Academic Philosophy between Idealism and Positivism, transl. by R. J. Hollingdale (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).
Kölbel, M., “Faultless Disagreement,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, N.S. CIV (2004): 53–74.
Kuhn, T. S., The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1977).
Kuhn, T. S., The Road since Structure: Philosophical Essays, 1970–1993, ed. Conant, J. and Haugeland, J. (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2000).
Kuhn, T. S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 50th edn (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2012).
Kusch, M., “A Primer on Relativism,” in Kusch (ed.), Relativism, pp. 1–7.
Kusch, M., A Sceptical Guide to Meaning and Rules: Defending Kripke’s Wittgenstein (Chesham: Acumen, 2006).
Kusch, M., “Epistemological Anarchism Meets Epistemic Voluntarism: Feyerabend’s Against Method and van Fraassen’s The Empirical Stance,” in Bschir, K. and Shaw, J. (eds.), Paul Feyerabend (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), forthcoming.
Kusch, M., Psychologism: A Case Study in the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge (London: Routledge, 1995).
Kusch, M., “Relativism in the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge Revisited”, in Ashton, N., Kusch, M., McKenna, R. and Sodoma, K. (eds.), Social Epistemology and Epistemic Relativism (New York and London: Routledge, 2020), pp. 184–203.
Kusch, M., “Relativist Stances, Virtues and Vices”, Proceeding of the Aristotelian Society XCIII (2019): 271–91.
Kusch, M., “Review of Latour, Pandora’s Hope and Hacking, The Social Construction of What?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science A33 (2002): 639–47.
Kusch, M., “Review of Latour, We Have Never Been Modern,” British Journal for the History of Science 28 (1995): 125–6.
Kusch, M., “Social Epistemology and Scientific Realism,” in Saatsi (ed.), Scientific Realism, 261–75.
Kusch, M. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Relativism (London and New York: Routledge, 2020).
Ladyman, J., “The Scientistic Stance: The Empirical and the Materialist Stances Reconciled,” Synthese 178 (2011): 87–98.
Lange, M., An Introduction to the Philosophy of Physics (Oxford: Wiley, 2002).
Lange, M., “Review Essay on Dynamics of Reason,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (2004): 702–12.
Latour, B., We Have Never Been Modern, transl. by C. Porter (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993).
Latour, B., “Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Facts to Matters of Concern,” Critical Inquiry 30 (2004): 225–48.
Longino, H., “Values, Heuristics and the Politics of Knowledge,” in Howard, D., Kourany, J. and Carrier, M. (eds.), The Challenge of the Social and the Pressure of Practice (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2008), pp. 68–86.
MacFarlane, J., “Relativism and Disagreement,” Philosophical Studies 132 (2007): 17–31.
Massimi, M., “Perspectivism,” in Saatsi (ed.), Scientific Realism, 164–75.
Massimi, M. and McCoy, C. D. (eds.), Understanding Perspectivism: Scientific Challenges and Methodological Prospects (London: Routledge, 2020).
Mayr, E., “The Nature of Darwinian Revolution,” Science 176 (1972): 981–89.
McIntyre, L., Post-Truth (Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press, Kindle edition, 2018).
McMullin, E., “Rationality and Paradigm Change in Science,” in Horwich, P. (ed.), World Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the Nature of Science. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993), 55–78.
Mizrahi, M., “Kuhn’s Incommensurability Thesis: What’s the Argument?” in Mizrahi (ed.), Kuhnian Image, pp. 25–44.
Mizrahi, M. (ed.), The Kuhnian Image: Time for a Decisive Transformation? (London, New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2018).
Newton-Smith, B. (1981), The Rationality of Science (London: Routledge, 1981).
Okruhlik, K., “Bas van Fraassen’s Philosophy of Science and His Epistemic Voluntarism,” Philosophy Compass 9 (2014): 653–61.
Okruhlik, K., “Science, Sex, and Pictures: Reflections on van Fraassen’s Use of Perspectival Representations,” in Gao, C. and Liu, C. (eds.), Scientific Explanation and Methodology of Science (Singapore: World Scientific, 2014), pp. 156–69.
Patton, L., “Kuhn, Pedagogy, and Practice: A Local Reading of Structure,” in Mizrahi, Kuhnian Image, pp. 113–30.
Pennock, R., “The Postmodern Sin of Intelligent Design Creationism,” Science and Education 19 (2010): 757–78.
Pickering, A. (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1992).
Popper, K., The Logic of Scientific Discovery (London: Routledge, 1959).
Priest, G., Doubt Truth to Be a Liar (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2005).
Richards, R. J. and Daston, L. (eds.), Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions at Fifty: Reflections on a Science Classic (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2016).
Rorty, R., Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1981).
Saatsi, J. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Scientific Realism (London and New York: Routledge, 2018).
Sankey, H., “The Demise of the Incommensurability Thesis,” in Mizrahi, Kuhnian Image, pp. 75–91.
Sankey, H., “Witchcraft, Relativism and the Problem of the Criterion,” Erkenntnis 72 (2010): 1–16.
Scheffler, I., Science and Subjectivity (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1982).
Seidel, M., Epistemic Relativism: A Constructive Critique (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014).
Seidel, M., “Why the Epistemic Relativist Cannot Use the Sceptic’s Strategy: A Comment on Sankey,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44 (2013): 134–9.
Shapin, S., “Here and Everywhere: Sociology of Scientific Knowledge,” Annual Review of Sociology 21 (1995): 289–321.
Shapin, S., “Homo Phrenologicus: Anthropological Perspectives on an Historical Problem,” in Barnes, B. and Shapin, S. (eds.), Natural Order: Historical Studies in Scientific Culture (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1979), pp. 41–71.
Shapin, S., The Scientific Revolution (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1996).
Simmel, G., Essays on Religion, transl. by H. J. Helle (Newhaven: Yale University Press, 2013).
Soler, L., Sankey, H., and Hoyningen-Huene, P. (eds.), Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison: Stabilities, Ruptures, Incommensurabilities (Dordrecht: Springer, 2008).
Spiegelberg, H., The Phenomenological Movement: A Historical Introduction (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1960).
Street, S., “Evolution and the Normativity of Epistemic Reasons,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35 (2011): 213–48.
Teller, P., “Of Course Idealizations Are Incommensurable,” in Soler, Sankey, and Hoyningen-Huene (eds.), Rethinking Scientific Change, pp. 247–64.
Timmins, A., “Between History and Philosophy of Science: The Relationship between Kuhn’s Black-Body Theory and Structure,” HOPOS 9 (2019): 371–87.
van Fraassen, B., “On Stance and Rationality,” Synthese 178 (2011): 155–69.
van Fraassen, B., Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist Approach (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991).
van Fraassen, B., “Replies,” Philosophical Studies 121 (2004): 171–92.
van Fraassen, B., Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, Kindle edition, 2008).
van Fraassen, B., The Empirical Stance (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002).
van Fraassen, B., The Scientific Image (Oxford: Clarendon Press, Kindle edition, 1980).
Veigl, S., “Testing Scientific Pluralism,” unpublished PhD thesis, University of Vienna (2020).
Weber, M., The Protestant Ethic and the “Spirit” of Capitalism and Other Writings, transl. by P. Baehr and G. C. Wells (New York: Penguin, 2002).
Williams, B., “The Truth in Relativism,” in Williams, Moral Luck (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), pp. 132–43.
Wittgenstein, L., Nachlass: The Bergen Electronic Edition (CD-Rom, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).
Wittgenstein, L., Philosophical Investigations, transl. by E. Anscombe (Oxford: Blackwell, 1953).
Wittgenstein, L., Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, 3rd edn (Oxford: Blackwell, 1978).
Wray, K. B., Kuhn’s Evolutionary Social Epistemology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Kindle edition, 2011).
Wright, C., “New Age Relativism,” Philosophical Issues 17 (2006): 262–83.
